Abstract
Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris HPT has been widely used in studies of the metabolism of lactococcal dairy starter cultures. A comparison of the draft HPT genome with those from other strains of L. lactis subsp. cremoris will aid our understanding of the domestication and evolution of these important industrial cultures.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris HP (NCDO 607, ATCC 19257, DSM 20069, formerly Streptococcus cremoris) is the type strain of L. lactis subsp. cremoris (1) and the first defined-strain dairy starter culture bacterium used for cheddar cheese production. It was isolated from a mixed-strain starter in 1935 and used in most of the early observations on bacteriophages as a cause of starter culture failure (2). The HP designation originates from the Hopelands and Papatawa dairy factories in New Zealand, where it was first isolated (3). Subsequently, HPT has been used in many studies focused on lactococcal dairy starters, particularly the characterization of the cell envelope proteinase (4), although its tendency to produce bitter-flavored cheese means that other strains are now favored for industrial use (5). HPT is unable to deaminate arginine and fails to grow in 4% NaCl or at 40°C, giving it the subspecies cremoris phenotype (1). Its carbohydrate utilization profile is much more limited than that of wild-type L. lactis subsp. cremoris strains (6), with acid only being produced from N-acetyl glucosamine, cellobiose, fructose, galactose, glucose, lactose, and mannose. HPT harbors several plasmids, and the one encoding the cell envelope proteinase (pHP003, 13.4 kb) has been sequenced (5). The HPT chromosome has undergone rearrangement so that the positions of the rRNA operons differ from those found in most L. lactis strains (7).
The draft genome sequence of HPT was determined using pyrosequencing of 3-kb mate paired-end sequence libraries on a 454 GS FLX platform with Titanium chemistry (Macrogen, South Korea). Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler version 2.5.3 (Roche 454 Life Sciences, USA), resulting in 213 contigs, the largest of which is 104,897 bp. Protein-coding genes were identified by Glimmer (8), and a GAMOLA/ARTEMIS software suite (9, 10) was used to manage genome annotation. The assignment of protein functions to open reading frames (ORFs) was performed manually using results from BLASTp and the COG (Clusters of Orthologous Groups), Pfam, and TIGRFAM databases (11–13).
The draft genome sequence of L. lactis subsp. cremoris HPT is 2,276,325 bp, with a G+C content of 36.7% and 2,374 predicted coding sequences. The gene content is very similar to those of other L. lactis subsp. cremoris dairy starter strains, but the genes for starch/maltose breakdown, tryptophan metabolism, and tolerance to osmotic stress are missing, as has been reported previously (14). It is likely that the high contig number results from the presence of numerous transposases that are characteristic of these dairy starter strains. The genome also contains ~120 ORFs that match various lactococcal phages.
A comparison of the HPT genome with those from three other industrially used L. lactis subsp. cremoris strains, A76, SK11, and UC509.9 (15–17), shows a clear relationship between the strains and will help in understanding the origins, domestication, and evolution of these important industrially used dairy starter bacteria.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession no. JAUH00000000. The version described in this paper is version JAUH01000000.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by the AgResearch Curiosity Fund.
Footnotes
Citation Lambie SC, Altermann E, Leahy SC, Kelly WJ. 2014. Draft genome sequence of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris HPT, the first defined-strain dairy starter culture bacterium. Genome Announc. 2(2):e00107-14. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00107-14.
REFERENCES
- 1. Schleifer KH, Kraus J, Dvorak C, Kilpper-Bälz R, Collins MD, Fischer W. 1985. Transfer of Streptococcus lactis and related streptococci to the genus Lactococcus gen. nov. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 6:183–195. 10.1016/S0723-2020(85)80052-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Whitehead HR, Cox GA. 1936. Phage phenomena in cultures of lactic streptococci. J. Dairy Res. 7:55–62. 10.1017/S0022029900001655 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Whitehead HR, Briggs CAE, Garvie EI, Newland LGM. 1956. The influence of cultural conditions on the characteristics of Streptococcus cremoris, strain HP. J. Dairy Res. 23:315–318. 10.1017/S0022029900008359 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Exterkate FA, Alting AC, Bruinenberg PG. 1993. Diversity of cell envelope proteinase specificity among strains of Lactococcus lactis and its relationship to charge characteristics of the substrate-binding region. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59:3640–3647 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Christensson C, Pillidge CJ, Ward LJ, O’Toole PW. 2001. Nucleotide sequence and characterization of the cell envelope proteinase plasmid in Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris HP. J. Appl. Microbiol. 91:334–343. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01390.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Fernández E, Alegría A, Delgado S, Martín MC, Mayo B. 2011. Comparative phenotypic and molecular genetic profiling of wild Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis strains of the L. lactis subsp. lactis and L. lactis subsp. cremoris genotypes, isolated from starter-free cheeses made from raw milk. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77:5324–5335. 10.1128/AEM.02991-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kelly WJ, Ward LJ, Leahy SC. 2010. Chromosomal diversity in Lactococcus lactis and the origin of dairy starter cultures. Genome Biol. Evol. 2:729–744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL. 1999. Improved microbial gene identification with Glimmer. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:4636–4641. 10.1093/nar/27.23.4636 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Altermann E, Klaenhammer TR. 2003. GAMOLA: a new local solution for sequence annotation and analyzing draft and finished prokaryotic genomes. Omics 7:161–169. 10.1089/153623103322246557 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Rutherford K, Parkhill J, Crook J, Horsnell T, Rice P, Ranjandream M-A, Barrell B. 2000. Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation. Bioinformatics 16:944–945. 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.10.944 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA, Koonin EV. 2000. The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:33–36. 10.1093/nar/28.1.33 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Punta M, Coggill PC, Eberhardt RY, Mistry J, Tate J, Boursnell C, Pang N, Forslund K, Ceric G, Clements J, Heger A, Holm L, Sonnhammer EL, Eddy SR, Bateman A, Finn RD. 2012. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:D290–D301. 10.1093/nar/gkr1065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Haft DH, Selengut JD, Richter RA, Harkins D, Basu MK, Beck E. 2013. TIGRFAMs and genome properties in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 41:D387–D395. 10.1093/nar/gks1234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Siezen RJ, Bayjanov JR, Felis GE, van der Sijde MR, Starrenburg M, Molenaar D, Wels M, van Hijum SA, van Hylckama Vlieg JE. 2011. Genome-scale diversity and niche adaptation analysis of Lactococcus lactis by comparative genome hybridization using multi-strain arrays. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 4:383–402. 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2011.00247.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Bolotin A, Quinquis B, Ehrlich SD, Sorokin A. 2012. Complete genome sequence of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris A76. J. Bacteriol. 194:1241–1242. 10.1128/JB.06629-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Makarova K, Slesarev A, Wolf Y, Sorokin A, Mirkin B, Koonin E, Pavlov A, Pavlova N, Karamychev V, Polouchine N, Shakhova V, Grigoriev I, Lou Y, Rohksar D, Lucas S, Huang K, Goodstein DM, Hawkins T, Plengvidhya V, Welker D, Hughes J, Goh Y, Benson A, Baldwin K, Lee JH, Díaz-Muñiz I, Dosti B, Smeianov V, Wechter W, Barabote R, Lorca G, Altermann E, Barrangou R, Ganesan B, Xie Y, Rawsthorne H, Tamir D, Parker C, Breidt F, Broadbent J, Hutkins R, O’Sullivan D, Steele J, Unlu G, Saier M, Klaenhammer T, Richardson P, Kozyavkin S, Weimer B, Mills D. 2006. Comparative genomics of the lactic acid bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103:15611–15616. 10.1073/pnas.0607117103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Ainsworth S, Zomer A, de Jager V, Bottacini F, van Hijum SA, Mahony J, van Sinderen D. 2013. Complete genome of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris UC509.9, host for a model lactococcal P335 bacteriophage. Genome Announc. 1(1):e00119-12. 10.1128/genomeA.00119-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]