Abstract
We report on a high-dimensional method to globally profile glycoproteins that are modified with sialyl Lewis A or Lewis X glycans. Specifically, glycoproteins in serum or plasma are fractionated on a high-density antibody microarray (i.e., each are localized to their specific antibody spot) and are specifically detected via fluorescently labeled anti-sialyl Lewis A or anti- Lewis X antibodies with quantification in a microarray scanner. Non-glycosylated proteins or glycoproteins with other glycan motifs do not interfere with this assay. The whole process is very rapid and applicable for high-throughput screening without the need for purification of glycoproteins from the samples. Using these methods, sialyl Lewis A or Lewis X moieties were found to be expressed on many previously unreported secreted or membrane associated proteins. Furthermore, the combination of sialyl Lewis A or Lewis X content with protein level increased the ability of certain glycoproteins to distinguish 30 patients with stage III and IV colon cancer from 60 control samples. Thus, this highly sensitive method is capable of discovering novel specific glycan modifications on proteins, many of which will likely be useful for disease detection and monitoring.
Keywords: glycoproteins, glycans, sialyl Lewis A, Lewis X, cancer biomarker, antibody array
Most current clinical cancer biomarkers are specific for glycoproteins (e.g., CA125, CA15-3, PSA and CEA for ovarian, breast, prostate and colon cancer, respectively) or carbohydrate structures (e.g., CA19-9 for pancreas cancer). Approximately 50% of all proteins are estimated to be glycosylated [1] and glycan abundance and their micro- and macro-heterogeneity can be changed in a disease-specific manner [2]. This change in carbohydrate structure can have independent diagnostic value as well as supplemental benefit to known markers for better specificity and sensitivity [3–5]. Previously most glycoprotein screening studies have relied on immunoprecipitation or lectin affinity capture of whole glycoproteins and mass spectrometry identification of the de-glycosylated protein portion [6–8]. In a few cases, protein classes such as the mucins for pancreas cancer have been probed with lectins in an array format containing up to a few hundred antibodies [9–11]. A recent study used 58 different antibodies to a variety of serum proteins including mucins, matrix proteins, adhesion proteins, and cytokines on an array to capture potential CA19-9 antigen carrying proteins from sera of pancreas cancer patients [12]. In this report, glycoproteins in blood or tissue samples are specifically captured by over 3000 antibodies on an array, and the glycan moieties on proteins are detected by two different fluorescently-labeled anti-carbohydrate-specific antibodies. This approach allows us to discern how widespread a specific carbohydrate modification was across a significant portion of the plasma proteome.
We selected sialyl Lewis A and sialyl Lewis X for our prototypical glycoproteomic analyses. Sialyl Lewis A is the antigen for serological biomarker CA19-9 [13] which has been used for diagnosis and follow-up of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers [14, 15]. Reported CA19-9 carrying glycoproteins include MUC1, MUC5AC, MUC16, apolipoproteins and kininogen [7]. CA19-9 detection on MUC5AC or MUC16 showed improved sensitivity over the standard CA19-9 alone assay for pancreas cancer [12]. The anti-sialyl Lewis-A antibody used in this study (clone SLE121) has been reported to be highly specific for sialyl Lewis A in a monomeric form or as a part of elongated carbohydrate structures at non-reducing ends [25, 26]. Sialyl Lewis X is another cancer specific carbohydrate markers sometimes used for cancer staging, prognosis [16] and progression [17]. Reported sialyl-Lewis X carrying proteins include alpha 1-acid glycoprotein [18], CD66 [19] and MUC7 [20]. The specificity of the anti-sialyl Lewis X antibody (clone 258-12767) we used for this study had not been tested so we examined it using carbohydrate microarray profiling on over 200 glycan ligands and several abundant serum proteins. The antibody displayed binding affinity to its sialyl Lewis-X antigen but showed 29x higher reactivity to dimeric Lewis X, 12x for Lewis A-Lewis X, 6x for lacto-N-hexose (Gal-GlcNAc) and 4x for Lewis A (see supplemental figure). Since its specificity is not limited to the sialylated form, we refer to the antibody as Lewis X specific but caution that any glycoproteins identified with this antibody would need to be further validated.
Detection of sialyl Lewis A and Lewis X on affinity captured proteins by high density antibody array
Each array contained approximately 3600 human-protein specific antibodies to ~3000 different proteins printed in triplicate (10800 total spots) on N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS)-ester reactive 3-D thin film surface slides (Nexterion H slide, Schott) as previously described [21, 22]. Microarray slides were blocked with 0.3% (v/v) ethanolamine in 50 mM sodium borate pH 8, washed, dried and incubated with sample. To detect levels of proteins in the plasma samples, we depleted albumin and IgG and 200 μg of the remaining protein from either the case or control sample was labeled with Cy5 and analyzed as previously described [21, 23]. To detect sialyl Lewis A or Lewis X carrying proteins, 10 μl of undepleted human plasma was diluted 1:8 in 0.05% Tween 20 in PBS, pipetted onto the slide at the microarray/coverslip (mSeries Lifter Slips, 22×25×1 mm, Thermo Scientific) junction and incubated for 60 min. Then, the slides were washed two times with 0.5% Tween 20 in PBS. Bound sialyl Lewis A or Lewis X carrying proteins were simultaneously detected after incubation with Cy3-anti-sialyl Lewis A and Cy3- or Cy5-anti-Lewis X monoclonal antibodies (US Biological; diluted to 5 μg/ml in 0.05% Tween 20 in PBS) for 60 min. The arrays were washed twice each with PBS/0.5% Tween 20, PBS and water followed by drying by centrifugation. Finally, the slides were scanned on a GenePix 4200A microarray scanner (Axon Instruments) to produce green (Cy3) and red (Cy5) images. Spot intensities of the scanned array images are obtained using Genepix Pro 6.0 image analysis software. As a control to determine background levels of signal, the arrays were incubated with just Cy3- and Cy5-labled anti-sialyl Lewis A and Lewis X specific antibodies (no plasma added), and the resulting signals were used for background subtraction. Our choice of sialyl Lewis A and Lewis X structures, which are rarely expressed on antibodies, helped keep the background low even without chemical derivatization of the arrayed antibodies (normally required for lectin based analyses) [24].
Over half of the arrayed antibodies were directed to secreted and transmembrane proteins which are usually glycosylated. We analyzed the protein, sialyl Lewis A and Lewis X content of a colon cancer and an undiseased control plasma sample to test the specificity and utility of this glycoprotemic array in profiling glycan carrying proteins (the completely de-identified plasma samples used were collected prior to colonoscopy under an Institutional Review Board approved protocol and diagnosis was confirmed by colonoscopy/pathology review). As expected, antibodies to MUC1 and MUC5AC bound protein with sialyl Lewis A moieties (spot intensities 1619 and 539 after background subtraction, respectively), and MUC1 was detected with the Lewis X antibody (spot intensity 970 after background subtraction). In addition to the mucin proteins, a significant number of other proteins with, to our knowledge previously unreported, sialyl Lewis A and Lewis X modifications were detected as potential glycoprotein biomarkers. If we define a protein as positive by requiring at least 500 intensity value (a very clear spot) after background subtraction and sample/background signal ratio greater than two at all 3 spots of the triplicate, we obtain a total of 42 and 112 sialyl Lewis A and Lewis X modified proteins, respectively. Of these, 29 antibodies bound proteins with both glycan modifications. We suggest that the presence of both modifications on a protein might even be a better indication than either modification singularly or the protein alone and this technology can detect these proteins. Fig. 1 shows magnified proteomic (lower two rows) and glycan (upper two rows) signals from different array regions emphasizing three examples of sialyl Lewis A or Lewis X carrying proteins that showed much higher levels for glycan than proteomic changes in a case and control sample. Examining the protein signal, CD44, CTSL2 and PDGFA showed 1.6-, 1.1- and 1.6-fold changes, respectively, between the cancer and control samples (Fig. 1B). In contrast, their glycoproteomic changes detected by anti-sialyl Lewis A were more striking. CD44, CTSL2 and PDGFA proteins showed 7.4-, 2.7- and 3.5-fold increases, respectively (Fig. 1A). Fig. 1C–D shows DCD, HBEGF and VWF have 1.8-, 2.2- and 1.2-fold changes in protein levels, respectively (Fig. 1D), but Lewis X changes of 4.1-, 6.0- and 7.5-fold, respectively (Fig. 1C). By taking a ratio of the change in sialyl Lewis and protein levels, all 6 of these proteins show more cancer-specific glycosylation changes in the colon cancer sample. This result confirms that being able to detect the specific glycan content of proteins could increase their utility as biomarkers.
Figure 1. Protein and sialyl Lewis A and Lewis X expression in control and colon cancer plasma samples.
Specific regions of the array are shown that include CD44, CTSL2, PDGFA, DCD, HBEGF and VWF proteins (boxed spots). (A, C) Glycan expression on proteins was profiled on the array with Cy3 labeled anti-sialyl Lewis A or Lewis X antibodies (shown as green). (B, D) The level of Cy-5 arrayed proteins for each sample at each spot is shown in red. Glycoproteins in the solid-outlined boxed regions show 1.1–2.2 fold change in colon cancer, but their sialyl Lewis A or Lewis X expression shows 2.7–7.5 fold higher levels in this specific cancer case than the healthy control.
Since sialyl Lewis A and X are both fucosylated tetrasaccharides that only differ in the position of the fucose linkages (Fig. 2A), we had to test for antibody specificity and cross-reactivity. Thus, the colon cancer plasma sample was incubated on our antibody array and sialyl Lewis A and Lewis X on the captured proteins were simultaneously detected with scanning parameters set to yield 1:1 total spot intensity count ratio between the two wavelengths. The overlaid array image displayed a mixture of green, red and yellow spots suggesting the two antibodies detected their carbohydrate antigens independently (Fig. 2B). For example, FGFBP1 predominantly expressed sialyl Lewis A (spot intensity 3605) without detectable Lewis X and appeared as a green spot in the overlaid image (Fig. 2C). FBLN2 was detected with predominately Lewis X expression and appeared as a red spot in the overlay (spot intensity 34346). Some proteins expressed both glycans as exemplified by the yellow NPY spot in the overlay (Fig. 2D, sialyl Lewis A spot intensity; 5160 and Lewis X intensity; 19476). To confirm that the two dyes do not indirectly bind to the carbohydrate structures and cause spectral bias, a plasma sample from the cancer patient used in Fig. 1 was incubated on array and Lewis X expression on the captured proteins was simultaneously detected with equal amounts of anti-Lewis X antibody each labeled with either Cy3 or Cy5, respectively. The resulting overlay image of the two dyes showed that virtually all the detected spots appeared yellow (not shown). When spots greater than 3000 intensity were examined, a plot of log2 transformed Cy5/Cy3 intensity ratios for each of the spots showed an average ratio of 1.01 ± 0.04 (mean ± std deviation), clearly verifying there is no spectral bias from Cy dyes using our approach.
Figure 2. Performance of anti-sialyl Lewis A and Lewis X antibodies in multiplex array assays and detection of the higher abundance glycoproteins.
(A) Sialyl Lewis A and X antigens are assembled from the same four monosaccharides and differ only in the position of their terminal fucose branches. The Lewis X portion of the structure is shown in the box. (B–D) A multiplex assay distinctively detected proteins expressing predominantly sialyl Lewis A (green spot), Lewis X (red spot) or both (yellow spots). (E,F) Plasma (10 μl) from a colon cancer patient was incubated on antibody array. Sialyl Lewis A and Lewis X expression on the captured proteins were measured and the 30 proteins with the highest glycan expression are presented after background subtraction. (G) Immunoprecipitated protein C2 (83 kDa) from a colon cancer patient plasma was detectable by anti-sialyl Lewis A and anti-Lewis X antibodies. As controls, proteins immunoprecipitated with other antibodies (PODXL and FIGF; generated in the same host and by the same manufacturer) and without any antibody (protein A resin only) were subjected to the same Western detection. No bands were detectable at the C2 protein size range. (H) PODXL protein (58 kDa) which showed no sign of sialyl-Lewis A and Lewis X modification by our microarray was not detectable by the same anti-sialyl Lewis A and anti-Lewis X antibodies. The similar control experiments as above were performed.
Next, we assessed the reproducibility of the glycoproteomic array by calculating coefficient of variation after incubation with plasma from the colon cancer patient. Triplicate spots within the same array proved highly reproducible for both sialyl Lewis A and Lewis X expression with 94% and 93% of the spots, respectively, showing coefficients of variation (CV) of less than 10%. When three independent arrays were incubated with the same plasma sample, 60% and 71% of the spots showed less than 10% CV for sialyl Lewis A and Lewis X, respectively and over 94% showed CVs of less than 20% for detection of both glycans. These levels of reproducibility are certainly acceptable for discovery purposes.
Fig. 2C and F show the top 30 proteins with the highest sialyl Lewis A or Lewis X glycan content. Some proteins carry one carbohydrate structure dominantly over another, and 4 (C2, CD59, F5 and SPARC) had higher levels of both glycan structures. Proteins detected mainly with Sialyl Lewis A modifications include A2M, ADAM9, AFP, B3GNT5, CD44, CSF3, CTBS, CTSL2, EFNB3, EPHA3, FGFBP1, IGFBP5, IL18RAP, INHBC, MSLN, MUC1, NPY, PDGFA, PROM1, RAF1, S100A7, TFF3, TGFB2, TNFRSF10A, WISP1 and WNT9B. Proteins with dominant Lewis X expression include C4B/C4A, CD27, CD97, COL18A1, COL1A1, COL4A3, CTSD, DCD, DEFA1, EFNA5, FBLN2, FCGR2A, IL10, IL2RA, KRAS, LAMB1, LIFR, NPY, PDIA3, SERPINE1, SHBG, SPARC, TFRC, TGFA, VWF, WISP2 and WNT7B.
To determine whether microarray-discovered glycan modifications of the proteins could be validated via alternative methods, we immunoprecipitated proteins from a colon cancer patient plasma and detected the presence of their putative glycans by anti-sialyl Lewis A and Lewis X antibodies via Western blotting. We chose to examine C2 protein, which gave ~3500 and ~9500 spot intensities in sialyl Lewis A and Lewis X profiling microarrays, and PODXL which did not show any sialyl Lewis A and Lewis X carrier by microarray (as a negative control) because both proteins gave reasonable bands at the expected molecular size in Western immunoblot. As expected, immunoprecipitated C2 protein showed bands at 83 kDa both via immunoblot and when blotting with anti-sialyl Lewis A and anti-Lewis X antibodies (Fig. 2G). Immunoprecipitated POXDL protein gave a nice band via immunoblot but no signal from the anti-glycan antibodies (Fig. 2H). Negative controls with an additional antibody raised in the same host as the others and a no antibody control also showed no anti-glycan, C2 or PODXL signal (Fig. 2G & H).
Given the high dimensionality of this assay, biomarker candidates would need to be tested in multiple sample sets prior to drawing any conclusions about their performance. However, we have performed a small study with plasmas from 30 late stage CRC patients (6 IIIa, 10 IIIb, 5 IIIc and 9 IV stages) and 60 healthy controls that were collected by the Great Lakes and New England Clinical Validation Center funded by the National Cancer Institute, Early Detection Research Network. Of the 30 patients, 20 were male with a median age of 59.5±10.6 years old and 10 were female at 62.0±13.3 years old. The analyses showed that there are glycoproteins that show statistically different protein, sialyl Lewis A and/or Lewis X content when the plasma of late stage colorectal cancer (CRC) patients was compared to the controls (Table).
Table.
Top 29 glycoproteins showing statistical significance for differences in 30 patients with late-stage colorectal cancers compared to 60 healthy controls.
Sialyl Lewis A comparison | Lewis X comparison | Protein comparison | Combination markers
|
||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Protein+SLeA | Protein+LeX | Protein +SLeA+ LeX | |||||||||||||||||||
Gene name | Coef | p-value | q-value | AUC | * Sen | Coef | p-value | q-value | AUC | * Sen | Coef | p-value | q-value | AUC | * Sen | AUC | * Sen | AUC | * Sen | AUC | * Sen |
ANXA2 | 0.328 | 0.003 | 0.165 | 0.730 | 0.433 | 0.447 | <0.001 | 0.036 | 0.829 | 0.633 | −0.410 | 0.035 | 0.055 | 0.724 | 0.482 | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d |
B3GNT5 | n /s | n/ s | n/ s | n /s | n/s | 0.807 | 0.001 | 0.047 | 0.843 | 0.455 | 0.807 | <0.001 | 0.008 | 0.796 | 0.467 | 0.811 | 0.500 | 0.895 | 0.727 | 0.914 | 0.773 |
CD44 (Ab 1) | 0.525 | 0.003 | 0.165 | 0.755 | 0.310 | 1.083 | <0.001 | 0.036 | 0.862 | 0.552 | 0.165 | 0.197 | 0.146 | 0.639 | 0.100 | 0.767 | 0.414 | 0.868 | 0.517 | 0.874 | 0.517 |
CD44 (Ab 2) | 0.490 | 0.004 | 0.172 | 0.725 | 0.357 | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | 0.370 | 0.103 | 0.101 | 0.615 | 0.207 | 0.792 | 0.481 | 0.734 | 0.370 | 0.791 | 0.519 |
CD46 | 0.364 | 0.004 | 0.172 | 0.749 | 0.429 | 0.418 | 0.001 | 0.036 | 0.778 | 0.464 | −0.447 | 0.001 | 0.008 | 0.787 | 0.273 | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d |
CEACAM1 | 0.613 | 0.005 | 0.178 | 0.732 | 0.333 | 0.685 | 0.004 | 0.071 | 0.800 | 0.476 | −0.612 | 0.021 | 0.044 | 0.714 | 0.333 | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d |
CRB3 | n /s | n/ s | n/ s | n /s | n/s | 0.311 | 0.003 | 0.062 | 0.762 | 0.444 | −1.051 | 0.006 | 0.023 | 0.805 | 0.436 | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d |
CST6 | n /s | n/ s | n/ s | n /s | n/s | 0.801 | 0.003 | 0.057 | 0.712 | 0.414 | 0.253 | 0.313 | 0.195 | 0.575 | 0.115 | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d |
CTSE | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | 0.502 | <0.001 | 0.036 | 0.840 | 0.607 | −0.567 | 0.018 | 0.038 | 0.685 | 0.203 | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d |
DCD | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | 0.561 | 0.003 | 0.060 | 0.740 | 0.241 | −0.666 | 0.033 | 0.055 | 0.723 | 0.405 | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d |
HSP90AB1 | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | 0.472 | 0.001 | 0.039 | 0.778 | 0.483 | 0.637 | 0.003 | 0.016 | 0.757 | 0.233 | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d |
HSPG2 | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | 0.719 | 0.002 | 0.052 | 0.771 | 0.379 | 0.644 | 0.012 | 0.031 | 0.755 | 0.214 | 0.822 | 0.393 | 0.862 | 0.500 | 0.862 | 0.536 |
IL1B | 0.630 | 0.001 | 0.085 | 0.698 | 0.241 | 0.829 | <0.001 | 0.036 | 0.816 | 0.414 | −0.376 | 0.113 | 0.107 | 0.619 | 0.143 | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d |
IL6 | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | 0.676 | 0.002 | 0.057 | 0.760 | 0.379 | 0.457 | 0.072 | 0.081 | 0.658 | 0.172 | 0.685 | 0.250 | 0.774 | 0.464 | 0.773 | 0.464 |
INHBC | 0.482 | 0.004 | 0.174 | 0.757 | 0.233 | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | 0.600 | 0.008 | 0.026 | 0.714 | 0.267 | 0.844 | 0.467 | 0.787 | 0.300 | 0.844 | 0.533 |
MARCO | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | 0.454 | <0.001 | 0.036 | 0.796 | 0.483 | −0.324 | 0.158 | 0.129 | 0.617 | 0.293 | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d |
MUC1 | 0.620 | 0.002 | 0.155 | 0.744 | 0.345 | 0.620 | <0.001 | 0.036 | 0.844 | 0.621 | −0.332 | 0.203 | 0.149 | 0.608 | 0.226 | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d |
NOTCH2 | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | 0.618 | 0.003 | 0.062 | 0.734 | 0.367 | 0.098 | 0.697 | 0.319 | 0.547 | 0.000 | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d |
NOTCH4 | 0.538 | 0.005 | 0.178 | 0.744 | 0.259 | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | 0.453 | 0.034 | 0.055 | 0.688 | 0.103 | 0.809 | 0.385 | 0.804 | 0.385 | 0.809 | 0.346 |
OAS1 | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | 0.507 | 0.004 | 0.071 | 0.705 | 0.433 | −0.156 | 0.410 | 0.229 | 0.561 | 0.255 | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d |
PECAM1 | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | 0.693 | <0.001 | 0.036 | 0.844 | 0.500 | 0.290 | 0.473 | 0.249 | 0.602 | 0.200 | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d |
PTPRC | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | 0.460 | 0.001 | 0.045 | 0.773 | 0.407 | -0.370 | 0.109 | 0.104 | 0.637 | 0.241 | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d |
PZP | 0.802 | 0.004 | 0.172 | 0.732 | 0.333 | 0.642 | 0.003 | 0.063 | 0.707 | 0.333 | 0.056 | 0.823 | 0.351 | 0.472 | 0.103 | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d |
TIMP2 | 0.553 | <0.001 | 0.074 | 0.810 | 0.517 | 0.676 | <0.001 | 0.036 | 0.829 | 0.552 | 0.266 | 0.225 | 0.158 | 0.430 | 0.000 | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d |
TLR2 | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | 0.313 | 0.004 | 0.064 | 0.772 | 0.483 | −0.353 | 0.083 | 0.090 | 0.668 | 0.214 | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d |
TNFSF9 | 0.615 | <0.001 | 0.074 | 0.823 | 0.607 | 0.627 | <0.001 | 0.036 | 0.806 | 0.571 | −0.221 | 0.248 | 0.169 | 0.595 | 0.193 | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d |
VIL2 | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | 0.622 | <0.001 | 0.036 | 0.840 | 0.586 | −0.096 | 0.744 | 0.331 | 0.499 | 0.160 | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d |
VWF | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | 0.588 | <0.001 | 0.036 | 0.855 | 0.741 | 0.298 | 0.168 | 0.133 | 0.606 | 0.214 | 0.787 | 0.360 | 0.900 | 0.720 | 0.884 | 0.680 |
WNT7B | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | n/s | 0.640 | <0.001 | 0.036 | 0.790 | 0.429 | −0.113 | 0.620 | 0.297 | 0.515 | 0.175 | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d |
Sensitivity at 90% specificity, n/s: not
signficant, n/d: not determined.
The table presents the top 29 glycoproteins that showed increased expression of either sialyl Lewis A or Lewis X in the cancer samples with p-values of ≤ 0.005. The q-value takes into account a correction for multiple comparison testing, and the coefficient is log2 of the intensity ratio between case and control samples. Of the 29 proteins with elevated glycan markers, only 5 were in our two lists of 30 most abundant glycoproteins shown in 2E and F indicating that most of the viable biomarkers might be from lower abundance glycoproteins. Of the 29, 15 showed decreases in protein level in cases, 6 of which were significant at p-value <0.05. The other 14 proteins showing increased protein included 8 sialyl Lewis A-modified proteins (CD44, CD46, CEACAM1, IL1B, INHBC, NOTCH4, PZP and TIMP2) and 11 Lewis X-modified proteins (B3GNT5, CD44, CST6, HSP90AB1, HSPG2, IL6, NOTCH2, PECAM1, PZP, TIMP2 and VWF). However, among them, only five proteins (B3GNT5, HSP90AB1, HSPG2, INHBC and NOTCH4) showed protein abundance changes with statistical significance at p<0.05. This demonstrates that our glycomic microarray could be used for biomarker discovery as a stand-alone-tool, but combinations of proteomic and glycomic levels of a protein might yield even better biomarker candidates. In the Table, we illustrate this point by examining the AUC for B3GNT5, CD44, HSPG2, IL6, INHBC, NOTCH4 and VWF each individually with sialyl Lewis A and/or Lewis X and then combined with protein levels. For example, VWF protein showed an AUC of 0.606 that increased to 0.900 when combined with Lewis X, and B3GNTS protein had an AUC of 0.796 that increased to 0.914 when combined with both sialyl Lewis A and Lewis X. Although this data is preliminary and any potential markers would have to be confirmed in multiple validation sample sets, it shows that colon cancer patients carry specific sialyl-Lewis A and/or Lewis X modified proteins and this array technique is capable of detecting them.
It should be noted that Lewis antigen production is controlled genetically and Lewis-negative individuals (10% in the Caucasian population [27]) do not produce sialylated Lewis antigens even when a large tumor is present [28]. The concentration of the marker is influenced by the patient’s secretor status (FUT2 gene) and Lewis genotype (FUT3 gene) [29]. Despite this limitation, sialyl Lewis A (CA19-9) is the primary biomarker used for surveillance of gastrointestinal cancers. Identification of the specific protein carriers of CA19-9 in pancreas and colon cancer samples will allow us to test whether determination of the concentration and extent of modification of specific sialylated proteins will show improved biomarker sensitivity and specificity over the class as a whole as suggested previously for some mucins [9]. This method could also be applied to other interesting cancer-associated glycans to study including T (Thomsen-Friedenreich, Galβ1-3α-Ser/Thr), Tn (GalNAcα-Ser/Thr) and sialyl Tn (sialylα2-6GalNAcα-Ser/Thr) for O-glycan antigens [30] and, increased β1-6 branching and sialylation for N-glycan antigens [2].
In conclusion, we describe a method that allows rapid screening for the levels of modified carbohydrate in potential cancer modified glycoproteins with high dimensionality and throughput. This method confirmed known glycoproteins to contain sialyl Lewis A (CA19-9) and Lewis X moieties and identified many additional ones that could be potential cancer biomarkers.
Linkers
Supplementary Material
The antigen binding specificity of the anti sialyl Lewis-X antibody used in this study was evaluated by high throughput carbohydrate microarray (see below for experimental details and the full list of the tested antigens). The bar graph presents 26 ligands that showed binding affinity with at least 100 spot intensity out of 65000 after background signal subtraction. Ligands with >500 spot intensity are marked with blue dots on the graph bars. The target antigen (sialyl Lewis X) listed by the antibody manufacturer was one of the high affinity ligands (ligand 8), however, much higher levels of reaction to Lewis X containing structures (ligands 1, 4 and 5), Gal-GlcNAc disaccharides (Lacto-N-Hexose, ligands 2, 6 and 7) and Lewis A were observed. Experimental procedure: microarray analysis was performed as previously described [26]. Briefly, the printed array slides were incubated with blocking buffer (3% BSA in PBS) for 2 h, followed by incubation with anti-sialyl Lewis X antibody (1 μg/mL) for 2 h at 37°C. The arrays were washed with PBS and incubated with DyLight 649 anti-mouse IgM (diluted 1:250 in PBS). The slides were washed with PBS and scanned on a GenePix 4000B scanner. Lewis A antibodies (clones 7LE and T174) and Lewis X antibody (clone 15C02) were incubated on separated array slides as positive controls.
Significance.
In this paper, we show that we can detect cancer-specific glycan modifications on thousands of proteins using a high-density antibody array paired with a glycan specific antibody to probe the bound glycoproteins. To our knowledge, our array is by far the largest and densest that has ever been used for global profiling of specific glycan modification on proteins. Analysis of colon cancer patient plasma for sialyl Lewis A and Lewis X modifications revealed previously unknown protein carriers of these modifications and significant increases in these specific glycans on some proteins in people with cancer versus healthy controls, suggesting this method could be used to discover novel biomarkers.
Highlights.
We use high density antibody arrays to detect cancer specific glycans on proteins.
Sialyl Lewis A and Lewis X carrying proteins were profiled from human plasma.
35 proteins showed overexpression of Lewis antigens in colon cancer.
Acknowledgments
This work was funded in part by grants U01 CA152746 (PDL) and U01CA086400 (DEB) from the National Institutes of Health as part of the Early Detection Research Network, grant P50 CA130810 (GI SPORE (DEB)), the Kutsche Family Memorial Chair in Internal Medicine (DEB) and the GRECC at the Ann Arbor VA Medical Center. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Abbreviations
Carbohydrates
- 3′SLacNAc
Sialylα2-3Galβ1-4GlcNAc – BSA
- 3′Sia-3-FL
Siaα2-3Galβ1-4(Fucα1-3)Glc -BSA
- 3′-sulpho-LeA
3-SO3-Galβ1-3[Fucα1-4)GlcNAc-BSA
- 3′-sulpho-LeX
3-SO3-Galβ1-4[Fucα1-3)GlcNAc-BSA
- 6′Slac
Sialylα2-6Galβ1-4Glc-APD-HSA
- 6′-sulpho-LeA
6-SO3-Galβ1-3[Fucα1-4)GlcNAc-BSA
- 6′-sulpho-LeX
6-SO3-Galβ1-4[Fucα1-3)GlcNAc-BSA
- 2′FucLac
Fucα1-2Galβ1-4Glc-BSA (BG-H5)
- Adi - 04
GalNAcα1-3Galβ-BSA (4/BSA)
- Adi - 17
GalNAcα1-3Galβ-BSA (17/BSA)
- A-LeB hexa
GalNAcα1-3(Fucα1-2)Galβ1-3(Fucα1-4)GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-BSA
- alphaGal
Galα1-3Galβ1-4GlcNAc-BSA
- alphaGal-6-deoxy
Galα1-3Galβ1-4(6deoxy-GlcNAc)-HSA (alphaGal)
- Ara5
Araα1-5Araα1-5Araα1-5Araα1-5Araα1-BSA
- Bdi
Galα1-3Gal – BSA
- BG-A
GalNAcα1-3(Fucα1-2)Galβ- -BSA
- BG-A1
GalNAcα1-3(Fucα1-2)Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-4(Glc)-APD-HSA
- BG-B (Dextra)
Galα1-3(Fucα1-2)Galβ-BSA from Dextra
- BG-B (EMD)
Galα1-3(Fucα1-2)Galβ-BSA from EMD
- BG-H1
Fucα1-2Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-4Glcβ APD-HSA
- BG-H2
Fucα1-2Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ-HSA
- Cellobiose
Glcβ1-4Glcβ-BSA
- Cellotriose
Glcβ1-4Glcβ1-4Glcβ-BSA
- Chito 3
GlcNAcβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-4GlcNAcβ-BSA (8/BSA)
- Chito 3 - 20
GlcNAcβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-4GlcNAcβ-BSA (20/BSA)
- DSLNT
Siaα2-3Galβ1-3(Siaα2-6)GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-BSA
- Forssman Di - 04
GalNAcα1-3GalNAcβ1-BSA (4/BSA)
- Forssman Di - 21
GalNAcα1-3GalNAcβ1-BSA (21/BSA)
- Forssman Di - 31
GalNAcα1-3GalNAcβ1-BSA (31/BSA)
- Fuc-a - 22
Fuc-α - BSA (22/BSA)
- Fuc-a - 04
Fuc-α - BSA (4/BSA)
- Fuc-b - 04
Fuc-β - BSA (4/BSA)
- Fuc-b - 22
Fuc-β - BSA (22/BSA)
- Fuc, Sia-LNnH-APD-HSA
Galβ1-4[Fucα1-3]GlcNAcβ1-6[Neu5Acα2-6Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-3]Galβ1-APD-HSA
- G2M4
Manβ1-4(Galα1-6)Manβ1-4(Galα1-6)Manβ1-4Manβ1-BSA
- GA1 - 06
Galβ1-3GalNAcβ1-4Galβ1-BSA (GA1tri or asialo-GM1; 6/BSA)
- GA1 - 20
Galβ1-3GalNAcβ1-4Galβ1-BSA (GA1tri or asialo-GM1; 20/BSA)
- GA1di
Galβ1-3GalNAcβ – HSA
- GA2di - 04
GalNAcβ1-4Galβ - BSA (GA2di or asialo-GM2; 4/BSA)
- GA2di - 16
GalNAcβ1-4Galβ - BSA (GA2di or asialo-GM2; 16/BSA)
- GA2di - 37
GalNAcβ1-4Galβ - BSA (GA2di or asialo-GM2; 37/BSA)
- GA2di - accurate
GalNAcβ1-4Galβ - BSA (from accurate chemicals)
- Gal3
Galα1-3Galβ1-4Galα-BSA (Gal3)
- Gal-a
Gal-α - BSA
- Gala1-2Gal
Galα1-2Gal-BSA
- Gala1-4Galb
Galα1-4Galβ-CETE-BSA
- Galα3-type1
Galα1-3Galβ1-3GlcNAc-BSA
- Gal-b
Gal-β - BSA
- Galb1-6Man-a
Galβ1-6Man-α - BSA
- Galilli
Galα1-3Galβ1-4Glc-BSA
- GalNAc-a - 04
GalNAc-α - BSA (4/BSA)
- GalNAc-a - 22
GalNAc-α - BSA (22/BSA)
- GalNAca1-6Galb - 04
GalNAcα1-6Galβ-BSA (4/BSA)
- GalNAca1-6Galb - 22
GalNAcα1-6Galβ-BSA (22/BSA)
- GalNAc-b
GalNAc-β - BSA
- Gb4
GalNAcβ1-3Galα1-4Galβ1-BSA
- Glc-a
Glc-α - BSA
- Glca1-6Glca1-4Glca1-4Glcb
Glcα1-6Glcα1-4Glcα1-4Glcβ-CETE-BSA
- Glc-b
Glc-β - BSA
- GlcNAca1-4Galb
GlcNAcα1-4Galβ-BSA (20/BSA)
- GlcNAca1-4Galb - 03
GlcNAcα1-4Galβ-BSA (3/BSA)
- GlcNAc-b
GlcNAc-β - BSA
- GlcNAc-Man3
Manα1-6(GlcNAcβ1-2Manα1-3)Manβ1-4GlcNAcβ-BSA
- GlcNAc-Man5
Manα1-6(Manα1-3)Manα1-6(GlcNAcβ1-2Manα1-3)Manβ1-4GlcNAcβ-BSA
- GM1
Galβ1-3GalNAcβ1-4(Siaα2-3)Galβ-4(Glc)-HSA
- GM3
Sialylα2-3Galβ1-4Glc-APD-HSA
- Hep-N-acetylated
fully N-acetylated heparin polysaccharide-BSA
- Hep-5000
heparin polysaccharide-BSA (MW ~5000)
- Hya8
(GlcNAcβ1-4GlcAβ1-3)4β1-BSA
- Hya9
(GlcAβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-4)4β1-3GlcAβ1-BSA
- Hybrid-M5N4B
GlcNAcβ1-2Manα1-3[Manα1-3(Manα1-6)Manα1-6](GlcNAcβ1-4)Manβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-BSA
- iLNO
Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-6 (Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-3)Galβ1-BSA
- Isomaltose
Glcα1-6Glcβ-BSA
- LacNAc
Galβ1-4GlcNAc – BSA
- LacNAc (trimeric)
Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ-APE-HSA
- LacNAc-Man5
Manα1-6(Manα1-3)Manα1-6(Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-2Manα1-3)Manβ1-4GlcNAcβ-BSA
- Lactose
Galβ1-4Glcβ – BSA
- LeA
Galβ1-3[Fuca1-4)GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-4Glcβ- BSA
- LeA-LeX
Galb1-3(Fuca1-4)GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4(Fuca1-3)GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-APD-HSA
- LeB
Fucα1-2Galβ1-3[Fucα1-4)GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-4Glcβ-BSA
- LeC
Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ – BSA
- LeX (dimeric)
Galβ1-4[Fucα1-3)GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-4(Fucα1-3)GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-APE-BSA
- LeX (monomeric)
Galβ1-4[Fucα1-3)GlcNAc-APD-HSA
- LeY
Fucα1-2Galβ1-4[Fucα1-3)GlcNAc – HSA
- LNH - 13
Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-6(Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-3)Galβ1-BSA (13/BSA)
- LNnH - 11
Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-6(Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-3)Galβ1-BSA (11/BSA)
- LNnT - 14
Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-BSA (14/BSA)
- LNnT - 04
Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-BSA (4/BSA)
- LNT - 05
Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ-BSA (5/BSA)
- LNT - 20
Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ-BSA (20/BSA)
- LSTa
Siaα2-3Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-BSA
- LSTb
Galβ1-3(Siaα2-6)GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-BSA
- LSTc
Siaα2-6Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-BSA
- Maltopentaose
Glcα1-4Glcα1-4Glcα1-4Glcα1-4Glcα-BSA
- Maltose
Glcα1-4Glcβ-BSA
- Man3
Manα1-6(Manα1-3)Manβ1-4GlcNAc -BSA
- Man5
Manα1-6(Manα1-3)Manα1-6(Manα1-3)Manβ1-4GlcNAc-BSA
- Man6 - II
Manα1-2Manα1-3Manα1-6(Manα1-2Manα1-3)Manβ1-BSA
- Man6 - I
Manα1-6(Manα1-3)Manα1-6(Manα1-2Manα1-3)Manβ1-BSA
- Man7D1
Manα1-6(Manα1-3)Manα1-6(Manα1-2Manα1-2Manα1-3)Manβ1-4GlcNAc-BSA
- Man7D3
Manα1-2Manα1-6(Manα1-3)Manα1-6(Manα1-2Manα1-3)Manβ1-4GlcNAc-BSA
- Man8D1D3
Manα1-2Manα1-6(Manα1-3)Manα1-6(Manα1-2Manα1-2Manα1-3)Manβ1-4GlcNAc-BSA
- Man9
Manα1-2Manα1-6(Manα1-2Manα1-3)Manα1-6(Manα1-2Manα1-2Manα1-3)Manβ1-4GlcNAc-BSA
- Man-a
Man-α - BSA
- Mana1-6Man-a
Manα1-6Man-α - BSA
- Manb4
Manβ1-4Manβ1-4Manβ1-4Manβ1-BSA
- ManT
Manα1-6[Manα1-3]Manβ -BSA
- MFLNH I
Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-6 (Fucα1-2Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-3)Galβ1-BSA
- MFLNH III
Galβ1-4(Fucα1-3)GlcNAcβ1-6 (Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-3)Galβ1-BSA
- MSMFLNH I
Siaa2-6Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-6 (Fuca1-2Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-3)Galβ1-BSA
- MSMFLnNH
Galβ1-4(Fucα1-3)GlcNAcβ1-6 (Siaα2-6Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-3)Galβ1-BSA
- NA2
Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-2Manα1-6[Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-2Manα1-3]Manβ1-4GlcNAc -BSA
- NA3
Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-2Manα1-6[Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-2(Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-2)Manα1-3]Manβ1-4GlcNAc -BSA
- NA4
Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-2(Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-6)Manα1-6[Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-2(Galb1-4GlcNAcb1- 4)Manα1-3]Manβ1-4GlcNAc -BSA
- NGA2
GlcNAcβ1-2Manα1-6(GlcNAcb1-2Manα1-3)Manβ1-4GlcNAc -BSA
- NGA2B
GlcNAcβ1-2Manα1-6(GlcNAcb1-2Manα1-3)(GlcNAcb1-4)Manβ1-4GlcNAc -BSA
- NGA3
GlcNAcβ1-2Manα1-6[GlcNAcb1-2(GlcNAcb1-4)Manα1-3]Manβ1-4GlcNAc -BSA
- NGA3B
GlcNAcβ1-2Manα1-6[GlcNAcb1-2(GlcNAcb1-4)Manα1-3](GlcNAcβ1-4)Manβ1-4GlcNAc-BSA
- NGA4
GlcNAcβ1-2(GlcNAcβ1-6)Manα1-6[GlcNAcb1-2(GlcNAcb1-4)Manα1-3]Manβ1-4GlcNAc-BSA
- NGA4(B)2
GlcNAcβ1-2(GlcNAcβ1-4)(GlcNAcβ1-6)Manα1-6[GlcNAcb1-2Manα1-3](GlcNAcβ1-4)Manβ1- 4GlcNAc -BSA
- NGA5B
GlcNAcβ1-2(GlcNAcβ1-4)(GlcNAcβ1-6)Manα1-6[GlcNAcb1-2(GlcNAcb1-4)Manα1-3](GlcNAcβ1- 4)Manβ1-4GlcNAc -BSA
- P1
Galα1-4Galβ1-4GlcNAc-BSA
- Pk or Gb3
Galα1-4Galβ1-4Glc-HSA
- pLNH
Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-BSA (21/BSA)
- pLNH - 07
Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-BSA (7/BSA)
- Rha-a
Rha-α – BSA
- Rha-b
Rha-β - BSA
- Sialyl LeA
Siaα2-3Galβ1-3[Fucα1-4)GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-APD-HSA
- Sialyl LeX
Sialylα2-3Galβ1-4[Fucα1-3)GlcNAc – BSA
- TFiLNO(1-2,1-2,1-3)
Fuca1-2Galb1-3GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4(Fuca1-3)GlcNAcb1-6(Fuca1-2Galb1-3GlcNAcb1-3)Galb- BSA
- Sia-LNnT
Siaα2-3Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-APD-HSA
- Sia-LNF V
Fucα1-2Galβ1-3[Neu5Acα2-6]GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-APD-HSA
- X3Glc3
Xylα1-6Glcβ1-4(Xylα1-6)Glcβ1-4(Xylα1-6)Glcβ1-BSA
- Xylβ4
Xylβ1-4Xylβ1-4Xylβ1-4Xylβ1-BSA
Glycoproteins
- AGE30
Advanced glycation endproducts- Glucose + BSA on day 30 (AGE30)
- AGE60
Advanced glycation endproducts- Glucose + BSA on day 60 (AGE60)
- AGE90
Advanced glycation endproducts- Glucose + BSA on day 90 (AGE90)
- Alpha-1-acid glycoprotein
alpha1 Acid Glycoprotein
- Alpha-fetoprotein
alpha fetoprotein
- BSM
Bovine submaxillary mucin (STn, STF, S-GlcNAcβ1-3, ~20% of Sia is acetylated at 7,8, or 9)
- BSM (asialo)
Asialo-Bovine submaxillary mucin (aBSM, Tn, TF, GlcNAcβ1-3GalNAc)
- BSM (deacetylated)
Deacetylated-Bovine submaxillary mucin
- BSM (ox)
periodate oxidized bovine submaxillary mucin
- CEA
carcinoembryonic antigen
- FABP
Fatty Acid Binding Protein
- fetuin
fetuin (Sia2-3LacNAc, Sia2-6LacNAc, SiaLeC, STF)
- fetuin (asialo)
asialofetuin (Galb1-4GlcNAc, Galb1-3GlcNAc, Galb1-3GalNAc)
- Fetuin (ox)
periodate oxidized fetuin
- glycophorin (asialo)
asialo-glycophorin A
- Glycophorin A
Glycophorin A
- hsp90
Heat Shock Protein 90
- KLH
Keyhole limpet hemocyanin
- KLH (oxidized)
periodate oxidized Keyhole limpet hemocyanin
- OSM
Ovine submaxillary mucin (94% STn, 4% TF, 2% Fuca1-2Galβ1-3GalNAc)
- OSM (asialo)
asialo-Ovine submaxillary mucin
- OSM (asialo, enzym)
enzyme treated asialo-OSM (almost all Tn)
- OSM (enzym)
enzyme treated Ovine submaxillary mucin (almost all STn)
- OSM (ox)
periodate oxidized ovine submaxillary mucin
- ovalbumin
ovalbumin (56% Man5+Man6)
- Ovalbumin (ox)
periodate oxidized ovalbumin
- PSA
Prostate Specific Antigen; human seminal fluid
- Tgl
Thyroglobulin
Peptides
- Ac-A-Tn(Thr)-S-G - 05
Ac-Ala-(GalNAcα)Thr-Ser-Gly-Hex (5/BSA)
- Ac-A-Tn(Thr)-S-G - 08
Ac-Ala-(GalNAcα)Thr-Ser-Gly-Hex (8/BSA)
- Ac-A-Tn(Thr)-S-G - 23
Ac-Ala-(GalNAcα)Thr-Ser-Gly-Hex (23/BSA)
- Ac-G-V-Tn(Thr)-S-A-G - 04
Ac-Gly-Val-(GalNAcα)Thr-Ser-Ala-Gly-Hex (muc1) (4/BSA)
- Ac-G-V-Tn(Thr)-S-A-G - 21
Ac-Gly-Val-(GalNAcα)Thr-Ser-Ala-Gly-Hex (muc1) (21/BSA)
- Ac-P-Tn(Thr)-T-G - 05
Ac-Pro-(GalNAcα)Thr-Thr-Gly-Hex (muc2) (5/BSA)
- Ac-P-Tn(Thr)-T-G - 08
Ac-Pro-(GalNAcα)Thr-Thr-Gly-Hex (muc2) (8/BSA)
- Ac-P-Tn(Thr)-T-G - 22
Ac-Pro-(GalNAcα)Thr-Thr-Gly-Hex (muc2) (22/BSA)
- Ac-S-S-S-G
Ac-Ser-Ser-Ser-Gly-BSA (24/BSA)
- Ac-S-TF(Ser)-S-G - 04
AcSer-(Galβ1-3GalNAcα)Ser-Ser-Gly-Hex-BSA (4/BSA)
- Ac-S-TF(Ser)-S-G - 16
AcSer-(Galβ1-3GalNAcα)Ser-Ser-Gly-Hex-BSA (16/BSA)
- Ac-S-TF(Ser)-S-G - 28
AcSer-(Galβ1-3GalNAcα)Ser-Ser-Gly-Hex-BSA (28/BSA)
- Ac-S-Thr-S-A-G - 18
Ac-Ser-Thr-Ser-Gly-Hex -BSA
- Ac-S-Tn(Ser)-S-G - 04
AcSer-(GalNAcα)Ser-Ser-Gly-Hex-BSA (4/BSA)
- Ac-S-Tn(Ser)-S-G - 22
AcSer-(GalNAcα)Ser-Ser-Gly-Hex-BSA (22/BSA)
- Ac-S-Tn(Ser)-S-G - 33
AcSer-(GalNAcα)Ser-Ser-Gly-Hex-BSA (33/BSA)
- Ac-S-Tn(Thr)-A-G - 04
Ac-Ser-(GalNAcα)Thr-Ala-Gly-Hex (4/BSA)
- Ac-S-Tn(Thr)-A-G - 08
Ac-Ser-(GalNAcα)Thr-Ala-Gly-Hex (8/BSA)
- Ac-S-Tn(Thr)-A-G - 22
Ac-Ser-(GalNAcα)Thr-Ala-Gly-Hex (22/BSA)
- Ac-S-Tn(Thr)-G-G - 03
Ac-Ser-(GalNAcα)Thr-Gly-Gly-Hex (3/BSA)
- Ac-S-Tn(Thr)-G-G - 07
Ac-Ser-(GalNAcα)Thr-Gly-Gly-Hex (7/BSA)
- Ac-S-Tn(Thr)-G-G - 19
Ac-Ser-(GalNAcα)Thr-Gly-Gly-Hex (19/BSA)
- Ac-S-Tn(Thr)-S-G - 04
AcSer-(GalNAcα)Thr-Ser-Gly-Hex-BSA (4/BSA)
- Ac-S-Tn(Thr)-S-G - 24
AcSer-(GalNAcα)Thr-Ser-Gly-Hex-BSA (24/BSA)
- Ac-S-Tn(Thr)-S-G HSA -04
AcSer-(GalNAcα)Thr-Ser-Gly-Hex-HSA (4/HSA)
- Ac-S-Tn(Thr)-S-G HSA -23
AcSer-(GalNAcα)Thr-Ser-Gly-Hex-HSA (23/HSA)
- Ac-S-Tn(Thr)-Tn(Thr)-G - 05
Ac-Ser-(GalNAcα)Thr-(GalNAcα)Thr-Gly-Hex (muc2) (5/BSA)
- Ac-S-Tn(Thr)-Tn(Thr)-G - 09
Ac-Ser-(GalNAcα)Thr-(GalNAcα)Thr-Gly-Hex (muc2) (9/BSA)
- Ac-S-Tn(Thr)-Tn(Thr)-G - 22
Ac-Ser-(GalNAcα)Thr-(GalNAcα)Thr-Gly-Hex (muc2) (22/BSA)
- Ac-S-Tn(Thr)-V-G - 04
Ac-Ser-(GalNAcα)Thr-Val-Gly-Hex (4/BSA)
- Ac-S-Tn(Thr)-V-G - 22
Ac-Ser-(GalNAcα)Thr-Val-Gly-Hex (22/BSA
- Ac-TF(Ser)-G - 04
Ac(Galβ1-3GalNAcα)Ser-Gly-Hex-BSA (4/BSA)
- Ac-TF(Ser)-G - 24
Ac(Galβ1-3GalNAcα)Ser-Gly-Hex-BSA (24/BSA)
- Ac-Tn(Ser)-Tn(Ser)-Tn(Ser)-G-03
Ac(GalNAcα)Ser-(GalNAcα)Ser-(GalNAcα)Ser-Gly-Hex-BSA (3/BSA)
- Ac-Tn(Ser)-Tn(Ser)-Tn(Ser)-G-16
Ac(GalNAcα)Ser-(GalNAcα)Ser-(GalNAcα)Ser-Gly-Hex-BSA (16/BSA)
- Ac-Tn(Ser)-Tn(Ser)-Tn(Ser)-G-27
Ac(GalNAcα)Ser-(GalNAcα)Ser-(GalNAcα)Ser-Gly-Hex-BSA (27/BSA)
- Ac-Tn(Thr)-G - 21
Ac(GalNAcα)Thr-Gly-Hex-BSA (21/BSA)
- Ac-T-Tn(Thr)-P-G - 04
Ac-Thr-(GalNAcα)Thr-Pro-Gly-Hex (4/BSA)
- Ac-T-Tn(Thr)-P-G - 08
Ac-Thr-(GalNAcα)Thr-Pro-Gly-Hex (8/BSA)
- Ac-T-Tn(Thr)-P-G - 21
Ac-Thr-(GalNAcα)Thr-Pro-Gly-Hex (21/BSA)
- Ac-Tn(Thr)-Tn(Thr)-Tn(Thr)-G -05
Ac-(GalNAcα)Thr-(GalNAcα)Thr-(GalNAcα)Thr-Gly-Hex (muc2) (5/BSA)
- Ac-Tn(Thr)-Tn(Thr)-Tn(Thr)-G -08
Ac-(GalNAcα)Thr-(GalNAcα)Thr-(GalNAcα)Thr-Gly-Hex (muc2) (8/BSA)
- Ac-Tn(Thr)-Tn(Thr)-Tn(Thr)-G -20
Ac-(GalNAcα)Thr-(GalNAcα)Thr-(GalNAcα)Thr-Gly-Hex (muc2) (20/BSA)
- Ac-V-Tn(Thr)-S-G - 04
Ac-Val-(GalNAcα)Thr-Ser-Gly-Hex (4/BSA)
- Ac-V-Tn(Thr)-S-G - 08
Ac-Val-(GalNAcα)Thr-Ser-Gly-Hex (8/BSA)
- Ac-V-Tn(Thr)-S-G - 19
Ac-Val-(GalNAcα)Thr-Ser-Gly-Hex (19/BSA)
- GTSSASTF(Thr)GHATPLPTD
G-T-S-S-A-S-TF(Thr)-G-H-A-T-P-L-P-T-D-BSA
- GTSSATF(Ser)TF(Thr)GHATPLPTD
G-T-S-S-A-TF(Ser)-TF(Thr)-G-H-A-T-P-L-P-T-D-BSA
- GTSSASTGHATPLPTD
G-T-S-S-A-S-T-G-H-A-T-P-L-P-T-D-BSA
- GTSSATF(Ser)TGHATPLPTD
G-T-S-S-A-TF(Ser)-T-G-H-A-T-P-L-P-T-D-BSA
- GTSSASTGHATF(Thr)PLPTD
G-T-S-S-A-S-T-G-H-A-TF(Thr)-P-L-P-T-D-BSA
Controls
- BSA
Bovine serum albumin
- Cy3
Cy3-BSA (20μg/mL + BSA, 125μg/mL total)
- Cy5
Cy5-BSA (30μg/mL+ BSA, 125μg/mL total)
- HSA
Human serum albumin (isolated from serum)
- HSA (recomb)
human serum albumin (recombinant)
- PEG-linker
HO-(CH2)2-NH-Gly-CO-PEG7-NH-(CO)Hept-SH-Mal-Cychex-CO-BSA
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Apweiler R, Hermjakob H, Sharon N. On the frequency of protein glycosylation, as deduced from analysis of the SWISS-PROT database. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999;1473:4–8. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4165(99)00165-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Varki A, Kannagi R, Toole BP. Glycosylation Changes in Cancer. In: Varki A, Cummings RD, Esko JD, Freeze HH, Stanley P, Bertozzi CR, Hart GW, Etzler ME, editors. Essentials of Glycobiology. 2. Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 2009. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Adamczyk B, Tharmalingam T, Rudd PM. Glycans as cancer biomarkers. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1820:1347–53. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2011.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Reis CA, Osorio H, Silva L, Gomes C, David L. Alterations in glycosylation as biomarkers for cancer detection. J Clin Pathol. 63:322–9. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2009.071035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Drake PM, Cho W, Li B, Prakobphol A, Johansen E, Anderson NL, et al. Sweetening the pot: adding glycosylation to the biomarker discovery equation. Clin Chem. 2009;56:223–36. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.136333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wada Y, Azadi P, Costello CE, Dell A, Dwek RA, Geyer H, et al. Comparison of the methods for profiling glycoprotein glycans--HUPO Human Disease Glycomics/Proteome Initiative multi-institutional study. Glycobiology. 2007;17:411–22. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwl086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yue T, Partyka K, Maupin KA, Hurley M, Andrews P, Kaul K, et al. Identification of blood-protein carriers of the CA 19-9 antigen and characterization of prevalence in pancreatic diseases. Proteomics. 2011;11:3665–74. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201000827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hashii N, Kawasaki N, Itoh S, Nakajima Y, Harazono A, Kawanishi T, et al. Identification of glycoproteins carrying a target glycan-motif by liquid chromatography/multiple-stage mass spectrometry: identification of Lewis x-conjugated glycoproteins in mouse kidney. Journal of proteome research. 2009;8:3415–29. doi: 10.1021/pr9000527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Haab BB, Yue T. High-throughput studies of protein glycoforms using antibody-lectin sandwich arrays. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;785:223–36. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-286-1_15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yue T, Goldstein IJ, Hollingsworth MA, Kaul K, Brand RE, Haab BB. The prevalence and nature of glycan alterations on specific proteins in pancreatic cancer patients revealed using antibody-lectin sandwich arrays. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2009;8:1697–707. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M900135-MCP200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wu YM, Nowack DD, Omenn GS, Haab BB. Mucin glycosylation is altered by pro-inflammatory signaling in pancreatic-cancer cells. Journal of proteome research. 2009;8:1876–86. doi: 10.1021/pr8008379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yue T, Maupin KA, Fallon B, Li L, Partyka K, Anderson MA, et al. Enhanced discrimination of malignant from benign pancreatic disease by measuring the CA 19-9 antigen on specific protein carriers. PLoS One. 2011;6:e29180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Magnani JL, Nilsson B, Brockhaus M, Zopf D, Steplewski Z, Koprowski H, et al. A monoclonal antibody-defined antigen associated with gastrointestinal cancer is a ganglioside containing sialylated lacto-N-fucopentaose II. J Biol Chem. 1982;257:14365–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Steinberg W. The clinical utility of the CA 19-9 tumor-associated antigen. Am J Gastroenterol. 1990;85:350–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kouri M, Pyrhonen S, Kuusela P. Elevated CA19-9 as the most significant prognostic factor in advanced colorectal carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 1992;49:78–85. doi: 10.1002/jso.2930490204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Iwata T, Nishiyama N, Nagano K, Izumi N, Tsukioka T, Chung K, et al. Preoperative serum value of sialyl Lewis X predicts pathological nodal extension and survival in patients with surgically treated small cell lung cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2012;105:818–24. doi: 10.1002/jso.23002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Remmers N, Anderson JM, Linde EM, Dimaio DJ, Lazenby AJ, Wandall HH, et al. Aberrant expression of mucin core proteins and o-linked glycans associated with progression of pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:1981–93. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Croce MV, Salice VC, Lacunza E, Segal-Eiras A. Alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (AGP): a possible carrier of sialyl lewis X (slewis X) antigen in colorectal carcinoma. Histol Histopathol. 2005;20:91–7. doi: 10.14670/HH-20.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Stocks SC, Kerr MA. Neutrophil NCA-160 (CD66) is the major protein carrier of selectin binding carbohydrate groups LewisX and sialyl lewisX. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993;195:478–83. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1993.2068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Karlsson NG, Thomsson KA. Salivary MUC7 is a major carrier of blood group I type O-linked oligosaccharides serving as the scaffold for sialyl Lewis x. Glycobiology. 2009;19:288–300. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwn136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Loch CM, Ramirez AB, Liu Y, Sather CL, Delrow JJ, Scholler N, et al. Use of high density antibody arrays to validate and discover cancer serum biomarkers. Mol Oncol. 2007;1:313–20. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2007.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rho JH, Lampe PD. High-Throughput Screening for Native Autoantigen-Autoantibody Complexes Using Antibody Microarrays. Journal of proteome research. 2013 doi: 10.1021/pr4001674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ramirez AB, Loch CM, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Wang X, Wayner EA, et al. Use of a single-chain antibody library for ovarian cancer biomarker discovery. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2010;9:1449–60. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M900496-MCP200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chen S, Haab BB. Analysis of glycans on serum proteins using antibody microarrays. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;520:39–58. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-811-9_4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Online database: specificity of anti-sialyl Lewis A glycolipids (CA19-9) antibody, clone 121SLE. CFG functional glycomics gateway. 2011 ( http://www.functionalglycomics.org/glycomics/HServlet?operation=view&sideMenu=no&psId=primscreen_5465)
- 26.Manimala JC, Roach TA, Li Z, Gildersleeve JC. High-throughput carbohydrate microarray profiling of 27 antibodies demonstrates widespread specificity problems. Glycobiology. 2007;17:17C–23C. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwm047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Goonetilleke KS, Siriwardena AK. Systematic review of carbohydrate antigen (CA 19-9) as a biochemical marker in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33:266–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Locker GY, Hamilton S, Harris J, Jessup JM, Kemeny N, Macdonald JS, et al. ASCO 2006 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:5313–27. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.2644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Vestergaard EM, Hein HO, Meyer H, Grunnet N, Jorgensen J, Wolf H, et al. Reference values and biological variation for tumor marker CA 19-9 in serum for different Lewis and secretor genotypes and evaluation of secretor and Lewis genotyping in a Caucasian population. Clin Chem. 1999;45:54–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Brockhausen I. Mucin-type O-glycans in human colon and breast cancer: glycodynamics and functions. EMBO Rep. 2006;7:599–604. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
The antigen binding specificity of the anti sialyl Lewis-X antibody used in this study was evaluated by high throughput carbohydrate microarray (see below for experimental details and the full list of the tested antigens). The bar graph presents 26 ligands that showed binding affinity with at least 100 spot intensity out of 65000 after background signal subtraction. Ligands with >500 spot intensity are marked with blue dots on the graph bars. The target antigen (sialyl Lewis X) listed by the antibody manufacturer was one of the high affinity ligands (ligand 8), however, much higher levels of reaction to Lewis X containing structures (ligands 1, 4 and 5), Gal-GlcNAc disaccharides (Lacto-N-Hexose, ligands 2, 6 and 7) and Lewis A were observed. Experimental procedure: microarray analysis was performed as previously described [26]. Briefly, the printed array slides were incubated with blocking buffer (3% BSA in PBS) for 2 h, followed by incubation with anti-sialyl Lewis X antibody (1 μg/mL) for 2 h at 37°C. The arrays were washed with PBS and incubated with DyLight 649 anti-mouse IgM (diluted 1:250 in PBS). The slides were washed with PBS and scanned on a GenePix 4000B scanner. Lewis A antibodies (clones 7LE and T174) and Lewis X antibody (clone 15C02) were incubated on separated array slides as positive controls.