Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2013 Nov 1;87:242–251. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.041

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Average single-trial EEG discrimination performance across subjects (N = 12) with 30ms training window. Bands represent standard error across subjects. For each subject, only discrimination components passing p < 0.05 were used for further analysis. Az values for phase coherences 20% and 25% are not shown since their EEG discrimination performance was worse than that of 30% coherence and never above the p < 0.05 significance level. Topographies represent the group averaged forward models of early (left) and late (right) components at time of peak discrimination (referred to as optimal discriminating components).