Abstract
Cytochrome c6, (cyt c6) a soluble monoheme electron transport protein, was isolated and characterized from the chlorophyll d-containing cyanobacterium Acaryochoris marina, the type strain MBIC11017. The protein was purified using ammonium sulfate precipitation, ion exchange and gel filtration column chromatography, and fast performance liquid chromatography. Its molecular mass and pI have been determined to be 8.87 kDa and less than 4.2, respectively, by mass spectrometry and isoelectrofocusing (IEF). The protein has an alpha helical structure as indicated by CD (circular dichroism) spectroscopy and a reduction midpoint potential (Em) of +327 mV versus the normal hydrogen electrode (NHE) as determined by redox potentiometry. Its potential role in electron transfer processes is discussed.
Keywords: Acaryochloris marina, Cyanobacteria, Cytochrome c6, Photosynthesis, Chlorophyll d
Introduction
Acaryochloris marina, a unicellular marine cyanobacterium, is unique among oxygenic phototrophs in the fact that it uses chlorophyll d as its primary photosynthetic pigment. Compared to other chlorophyll species, chlorophyll d absorbs light at longer wavelengths (Miyashita et al. 1996; Hu et al. 1998; Schenderlein et al. 2008; Swingley et al. 2005; Tomo et al. 2008). In the environments in which A. marina grows, including associations with ascidians (sea squirts) and eukaryotic macro-algae and as a part of microbial mats in the Salton Sea, a California salt lake, other chlorophyll-containing species absorb most of the shorter wavelength light. This leaves unused near infrared light from 700 to 740 nm, which A. marina can absorb efficiently with its unique chlorophyll d pigment (Miller et al. 2005; Bailleul et al. 2008; Cser et al. 2008; Ohasi et al. 2008; Renger and Schlodder 2008; Swingley et al. 2005; Swingley et al. 2008). The presence of this unusual pigment has made A. marina a species of interest for evolutionary analysis and possibly for bioenergy applications, and so we have begun investigating the proteins and complexes involved in its photosynthetic apparatus. One such protein is cytochrome c6, (cyt c6) which is involved in A. marina’s photosynthetic electron transport chain (Bailleul et al. 2008).
Cyt c6, a small soluble monoheme protein, is responsible for transfer of electrons between the cytochrome b6f complex to Photosystem I (PSI) in cyanobacterial and algal species (Bialek et al. 2008; Chida et al. 2007; Cho et al. 1999; De la Cerda et al. 1999; Inda et al. 1999; Proux-Delrourye et al. 2003; Steiner et al. 2000). The protein is categorized as a class I cytochrome with histidine and methionine serving as its fifth and sixth ligands (Diaz-Quintana et al. 2003; Marcaida et al. 2006; Medina et al. 1993; Worrall et al. 2007). It is a small protein, usually less than 100 amino acid residues in length and less than 10 kDa in molecular mass (Bialek et al. 2008; Campos et al. 1993; Steiner et al. 2000). The pI of the protein can vary widely among species; typically it is acidic in algae and unicellular cyanobacteria and basic in filamentous cyanobacteria (Inda et al. 1999; Medina et al. 1993). Among cytochromes, it has a high midpoint potential (Em) ranging between 300 and 390 mV versus the normal hydrogen electrode (NHE; Bialek et al. 2008; Campos et al. 1993; Inda et al. 1999; Steiner et al. 2000). The difference in pI and Em among species is thought to be due to changes in the charged residues that dock with cytochrome f, which hints at a possible co-evolution of cyt c6 and cytochrome f (Diaz-Quintana et al. 2008; Kerfeld and Krogman 1998).
Different isoforms of cyt c6 have been found during purification of various cyanobacterial species (Kerfeld and Krogman 1998). The genome of A. marina has been sequenced and shows two possible cyt c6 isoforms annotated as petJ genes: AM1_2756 having 121 amino acids with a theoretical molecular weight of 10,759 Daltons for the gene product and a pI of 8.0 for the mature protein and AM1_3887 having 109 amino acids with a theoretical molecular weight of 10,819 Daltons for the gene product and a pI of 4.2 for the mature protein (Swingley et al. 2008).
In many cyanobacterial and algal species, plastocyanin (PC) a small blue copper protein, can functionally replace cyt c6 in its electron transfer role (Bailleul et al. 2008; Chida et al. 2007; Cho et al. 1999; De la cerda 1999; Diaz-Quintana et al. 2003; Steiner et al. 2000). The sequenced A. marina genome also shows the presence of plastocyanin annotated as the petE gene: AM1_3369 (Swingley et al. 2008). When both proteins are present in a species, PC is typically the dominant protein expressed while cyt c6 is progressively expressed under increasingly copper deficient conditions (Bialek et al. 2008; Campos et al. 1993; Cho et al. 1999; Diaz-Quintana et al. 2003; Inda et al. 1999; Worrall et al. 2007). In addition, PC and cyt c6 are usually of similar size, pI, and Em when both occur in the same species (Kerfeld and Krogman 1998; Medina et al. 1993). The predicted pI for the PC of A. marina is 4.34, which is very similar to the predicted value for the cyt c6 gene product of AM1_3887. It has been suggested that the presence of these two unrelated proteins performing the same function in the same species has implications in photosynthetic evolution. When the Earth was still under anaerobic conditions, reduced iron was more soluble and readily available than reduced copper and cyt c6 evolved first. However, when oxygen became plentiful, soluble oxidized copper was more readily available than oxidized iron and PC became the main electron transfer protein (Marcaida et al. 2006). This hypothesis is supported by the fact that only PC is present in this role in higher plants (Campos et al. 1993; Chida et al. 2007; De la Cerda et al. 1999; Diaz-Quintana et al. 2003, 2008; Inda et al. 1999; Kerfeld and Krogman 1998; Medina et al. 1993).
In addition, other modified cyt c6 forms have recently been discovered in higher plants and the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 (Bialek et al. 2008; Marcaida et al. 2006; Worrall et al. 2007). The form in higher plants has been designated cytochrome c6A and differs from the typical cyt c6 by the presence of a 12 residue loop and a lower redox potential. The lower potential precludes it from serving as an effective electron transfer agent between cytochrome b6f and PSI and its function remains unclear (Marcaida et al. 2006; Worrall et al. 2007). Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 has two genes petJ1 and petJ2, which code for two different isoforms of cyt c6. The gene product of petJ1 is a typical cyt c6, while that of petJ2 has a substantially lower redox potential and its function is also unclear. It has been tentatively designated as a cytochrome c6c form (Bialek et al. 2008).
Materials and methods
Growth conditions
The type strain MBIC 11017 of A. marina was grown in 16 L of culture in carboys for two weeks in Marine BG-11 media, a modified form of Blue–Green-11 media with 3.5% sea salt and enriched iron content equaling 0.016 g/L. Copper was present in the media as a trace metal at a concentration of 80 µg/L. The cultures were grown aerobically with air bubbling through a sterile filter at room temperature under a light intensity of 15–17 µmol/m2 s. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 7,000 rpm. The resulting pellets weighed typically between 8 and 10 g.
Purification protocol
The harvested cell pellets were re-suspended in 50 ml of 0.75 M phosphate buffer pH = 7. The high salt concentration was required to stabilize phycobillisome proteins that were being isolated simultaneously with cyt c6. The proteinase inhibitor PMSF was added to 1 mM concentration to the buffer. In addition, DNAse and magnesium chloride were added to 50 µM and 10 mM concentration, respectively, to the buffer. The cells were then broken using a bead beater (Biospec Products) with silicon carbide beads. The beads were added in a 1:2 ratio to the cell solution by volume. The bead beater was run in 20 s intervals and then placed on ice for 5 min to cool. The breaking and cooling steps were repeated for a total of six times.
Following the breakage step, the cells were centrifuged at low speed (3,850 rpm) at 15°C to remove beads and cellular debris. After low speed centrifugation, the resulting supernatant liquid was ultra-centrifuged at 44,000 rpm at 15°C for 2 h. The supernatant liquid from the ultra-centrifugation step was dialyzed overnight against 20 mM HEPES buffer pH = 7 at 4°C to exchange buffers before proceeding with further purification.
The dialyzed solution was then brought to 60% ammonium sulfate saturation by slowing adding ammonium sulfate while stirring. After all ammonium sulfate was dissolved, the solution was left to stir at 4°C for 30 min to ensure equilibrium had been reached. The solution was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm at 4°C for 15 min. The resulting supernatant liquid, which contained the cyt c6 fraction, was then extensively dialyzed against 20 mM HEPES pH = 7 to remove the ammonium sulfate.
After dialysis, the solution was filtered successively with 0.45 and 0.22 µm filters before being loaded onto a QSFF anion exchange column (GE Healthcare). After washing with binding buffer, the target protein was eluted with a step gradient of 0.1 M NaCl in 20 mM HEPES buffer pH = 7 at a flow rate of 2.5 ml/min. The fraction containing cyt c6 appeared as a light pink band on the column. As the band moved near the end of the column, the eluent was monitored for cyt c6 by measuring the UV–Vis spectra and looking for the characteristic cytochrome peak at 415 nm. Collection of the eluent began once this characteristic peak appeared and ended when the UV–Vis spectra no longer showed any presence of this peak. The collected fraction totaled near 25 ml and was stored at 4°C.
The purification to this point was repeated over three harvests. The collected fractions from the 1st ion exchange chromatography (IEC) column were then pooled and concentrated with a 10-kDa cutoff Amicon filter to a final volume of 0.25 ml.
After concentration, the pooled fractions were loaded onto a Sephacryl-100 HR gel filtration column (GE Healthcare). The cyt c6 fraction appeared as a pink band on the column as the sample was eluted at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min with 20 mM HEPES buffer pH = 7. When the pink band neared the end of the column, the eluent was collected in 3 ml fractions. The fractions were monitored for cyt c6 presence by measuring their UV–Vis spectra and monitoring the characteristic 415 nm peak. Peak fractions were collected and pooled together.
For the final purification step, the pooled fractions were loaded onto a high resolution 2nd IEC UNO Q1 column (Bio-Rad). The sample was eluted by a 1 ml/min flow rate of a linear gradient from 0–0.5 M NaCl in 20 mM HEPES buffer controlled using a Biologic DuoFlow System (Bio-Rad). The eluent was collected in 1 ml fractions and cyt c6 presence was monitored by UV–Vis Spectroscopy.
UV–Vis spectroscopy
The UV–Vis spectra of the samples were taken during purification and of the final product with a Perkin Elmer Lambda 950 UV–Vis spectrophotometer and analyzed by Perkin Lambda UV WinLab Explorer software. The spectrum of the purified protein in its native reduced state was taken in 20 mM HEPES pH = 7. The spectrum of the oxidized species was taken by adding potassium ferricyanide to 1 mM to the purified protein sample.
SDS-PAGE
SDS-PAGE analysis was performed on the peak fraction collected from the 2nd IEC column to determine purity of the sample. The sample and Polypeptide Molecular Weight Standards (Biorad) were run on a 10–20% acrylamide gradient precast tris-tricine SDS-PAGE gel (Biorad) designed for peptides and small proteins at 30 V for 1 h and 100 V for 1 h using a Criterion Cell (Biorad) and an EC 150 power supply (EC Apparatus Corporation).
Isoelectrofocusing
The pI of cyt c6 was determined by isoelectrofocusing (IEF). Purified cyt c6 sample was run on an IEF gel (Bio-Rad) with a pH gradient 3–10 with IEF standards (Bio-Rad). The gel was run at 100 V for 1 h with IEF cathode and anode buffer (Bio-Rad). The theoretical pI of the protein was calculated from the amino acid sequence using the compute pI/MW tool (http://a.expasy.org/tools/pi_tool.html.
Mass spectrometry
MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry was performed on the undigested purified cyt c6 using a 4700 Proteomics Analyzer and Science Explorer Software (Applied Bio-systems). For the undigested protein, a sample was taken directly from the purified cyt c6 and analyzed with the instrument to determine the mass of the intact protein. In addition, cytochrome c (cyt c) from equine heart (Sigma) was used as an internal standard to calibrate the instrument to determine the experimental error for the molecular mass.
LC-MS/MS was used to confirm the identity of the purified protein as cyt c6 from A. marina using a reverse phase C18 column custom packed with silica media (Microohm Bioresources) and a LTQ-orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermoscientific). The purified protein was tryptic digested following an in-solution protocol. The protein was first denatured by boiling, after which trypsin protease digestion solution (Sigma) was added to the sample. The sample was then digested overnight at 37°C. After digestion, the sample was analyzed by the mass spectrometer following a protocol previously established in our lab (Wen et al. 2009).
The theoretical mass of the intact protein and tryptic peptides was calculated using compute pI/MW tool and FindPept tool (http://ca.expasy.org/tools/pi_tool.html; http://ca.expasy.org/tools/findpept.html). Signal peptide prediction was performed using SignalP 3.0 Server to aid in the comparison of the experimental and theoretical masses (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/). The MASCOT program was used to search the NCBI database for matches with the product ions from the MS/MS analysis (http://www.matrixscience.com/).
Circular dichroism spectroscopy
The circular dichroism (CD) spectrum of cyt c6 at a concentration of 0.1 mg/ml in 10 mM phosphate buffer pH = 7 was determined with a JASCO J-815 CD spectrometer. The raw data were converted to molar ellipiticity using Spectra Manager II software. Secondary structure analysis was performed using CD PRO Software and its analysis programs SELCON3, CDSSTR, and CONTIN (http://lamar.colostate.edu/~sreeram/CDPro/main.html).
Redox titration
A redox titration was performed to determine the Em of cyt c6. Potential was controlled using a CH 620 C potentiostat (CH Instruments) and spectral changes of cyt c6 upon reduction and oxidation were monitored at 553 nm in a Perkin Elmer Lambda 950 UV–Vis spectrophotometer. The electrodes used were a platinum gauze working electrode, Ag/AgCl reference electrode, and platinum wire auxiliary electrode. 0.1 M NaCl was added as the supporting electrolyte to the cyt c6 sample in 20 mM HEPES buffer pH = 7. Potassium ferricyanide, dimethyl phenylene diamine, Fe(III) EDTA, and phenazine ethosulfate were all added at 20 µM to serve as redox mediators.
The fraction of cyt c6 reduced at each potential was determined by the changes in absorbance according to Eq. 1 where χ is the fraction reduced at the respective potential, A is the absorbance at 553 nm at the respective potential, Ao is the absorbance of the fully oxidized species at 553 nm, and Ar is the absorbance of the fully reduced species at 553 nm.
| (1) |
The fraction reduced was then plotted against potential (vs. NHE) in ORIGIN and fitted to a modified Nernst equation given in Eq. 2 where χ is the fraction reduced at a given potential, E is the given potential, and Em is the midpoint potential. These equations were derived using the method developed by Dutton (1978). A best fit for the midpoint potential parameter was obtained using ORIGIN’s iterative nonlinear regression analysis.
| (2) |
Results
UV–Vis spectroscopy
UV–Vis spectra of the purified sample in both its native reduced state and oxidized state are shown in Fig. 1. The reduced species showed the characteristic Soret band at 415 nm, alpha band at 553 nm, beta band at 520 nm, and delta band at 316 nm along with a band at 275 nm representing total protein. The ratio of the absorbance at the 275 nm band versus at the 415 nm band is 0.23. Upon oxidation, the alpha and beta bands disappear and are replaced with a broader band with a peak at 527 nm. The Soret band decreases in intensity and blue-shifts to 409 nm. Finally, the band at 316 disappears and a new band appears at 357 nm.
Fig. 1.
UV–Vis Spectra of purified cyt c6 from A. marina with the solid line representing the reduced form and the dashed line representing the oxidized form
SDS-PAGE
The SDS-PAGE of the peak fraction from the 2nd IEC column showed only one clearly distinct band between the 14 and 6.5 kDa markers indicating a highly pure protein (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
10–20% Gradient SDS-PAGE Gel of cyt c6 from A. marina. Lane 1 cyt c6 sample from 2nd IEC; Lane 2 Polypeptide Molecular Weight Standards
Isoelectric focusing
The pI of cyt c6 was determined to be less than 4.2 based on the IEF gel run with standards (Fig. 3). The predicted pI’s for the two different cyt c6 isoforms encoded by the AM1_2756 and AM1_3887 genes are 8.0 and 4.2, respectively indicating the gene product of AM1_3887 is the isoform expressed under our growth conditions.
Fig. 3.
IEF Gel of purified cyt c6 from A. marina. Lane1 IEF Standards; Lanes 2 and 3 purified cyt c6
Mass spectrometry
The MALDI-TOF spectrum of the whole protein showed peaks at 12360, 8868, 6180, and 4435 Da (Fig. 4). The set of peaks at 8,868 and 4,435 Da represent the masses of the singly charged cyt c6 plus the mass of a proton and of the double charged cyt c6 plus the mass of two protons, respectively, while the set of peaks at 12,360 Da and 6180 Da represent the masses of the singly charged cyt c plus the mass of a proton and of the double charged cyt c plus the mass of twp protons, respectively. The known mass for the internal standard cytochrome c from equine heart is 12,362 Da giving an experimental error in the mass accuracy of ± 4 Da. Therefore, the experimentally determined mass of cyt c6 is 8,867 ± 4 Da.
Fig. 4.
MALDI-TOF Spectrum of isolated whole mass cyt c6 from A. marina with cyt c from equine heart as an internal standard
The signal peptide analysis predicted a signal sequence cleaved between Ala 25 and Ala 26 residues. After subtracting the mass of this sequence and adding the mass of a c type heme (616 Da), the theoretical mass of the protein is predicted to be 8,867 Daltons. Thus the experimental and theoretical mass of the protein are in agreement.
The predicted peptide fragments of the AM1_3887 isoform from tryptic digestion are 2276, 2673, and 2807 Da, while those from the AM1_2756 isoform are 5321, 4255, 763, 629, and 503 Da. A peak at 2276 Da representing the tryptic digested peptide of ADALSANGMDSADAIINQVTNGK from the AM1_3887 isoform was found with the Orbi-trap mass spectrometer which was then further analyzed by MS/MS using the ion trap part of the instrument. The product ions from the MS/MS analysis (Fig. 5) were then used in MASCOT to search for matches from the NCBI database. The first hit retrieved by MASCOT matched the A. marina cyt c6 protein encoded by the AM1_3887 gene with a probability based mowse score of 2,096. The other hits retrieved by MASCOT were matches from other bacteria all with less significant mowse scores of lower than 100. This confirms that the purified protein is cyt c6 from A. marina and indicates that the isoform isolated during our purification is the one coded by the AM1_3887 gene, which is also in agreement with the IEF data.
Fig. 5.
LC-MS/MS Product ions from (a) Tryptic digested peptide ADALSANGMDSADAIINQVTNGK and (b) and their ms/ms Mass spectra from purified cyt c6 from A. marina
CD spectroscopy
The CD spectrum of cyt c6 was measured at 0.1 mg/ml concentration in 10 mM phosphate buffer pH = 7 (Fig. 6). Two peaks appear near 209 and 222 nm which is characteristic of an alpha helical structure. Secondary structure analysis predicted the overall structure to be alpha helical. The average structure given by the CD PRO analysis was a 66.1% alpha helical structure with most of the remaining structure constituted from undetermined or random folds at 25.6%. The analysis indicated a small amount of beta sheets (3%) and turns (4%) present in the sample.
Fig. 6.
CD spectrum of purified cyt c6 from A. marina
Redox titration
The Em for cyt c6 as determined by a redox titration was +327 mV versus NHE. The standard error in the midpoint potential is ±2 mV obtained by the ORIGIN fitting analysis. The redox titration plot shows a reversible Nernstian behavior corresponding to a one electron oxidation/reduction reaction (Fig. 7).
Fig. 7.
Redox titration of purifed cyt c6 from A. marina oxidative titration (black squares), reductive titration (white triangles), and Nernst fit (straight line)
Discussion
Cyt c6 from A. marina has been purified using ammonium sulfate fractionation, column chromatography including ion exchange and gel filtration, and FPLC. Only one cyt c6 isoform, corresponding to the AM1_3887 gene, was detected during the purification. In addition, no plastocyanin was detected during the purification. This result is in contrast with the recent analysis performed by Bailleul et al. (2008) in which they concluded that plastocyanin, not cyt c6, was the majority soluble electron carrier between cytochrome b6f and PSI in A. marina. In their study, they found that after a series of actinic flashes that absorbance of A. marina whole membrane samples were photo-bleached at 554 nm, where cyt c species absorb strongly. They concluded that this bleaching could be due to the oxidation of the cytochrome b6f complex alone or oxidation of both the complex and cyt c6. Since, 75% of the bleaching occurred after the first flash corresponding to one charge separation, it was concluded that the pool of electron donors to PSI associated with the bleaching was not in excess with PS I. Therefore, cyt c6 was considered unlikely to be the soluble electron carrier because the carrier is typically in an excess of 3:1 to PSI. However, this evidence against the presence of cyt c6 is indirect and no direct evidence for plastocyanin was presented in their analysis since its absorption spectrum is weak and broad and overlaps that of PSI (Bailleul et al. 2008).
The detection of only cyt c6 during our purification protocol suggests that in fact the cytochrome species is a major soluble electron carrier. This conclusion would suggest along with the findings of Bailleul et al. (2008), an unusual case of an electron carrier being present in a substoichometric amount relative to PSI. However, A. marina was grown in media with a higher concentration of iron in our study than that of the Bailleul et al. (2008) study. Quantitative measurements of the levels of plastocyanin and cyt c6 under different growth conditions would help clarify this situation.
While A. marina is unique among cyanobacteria in using chlorophyll d as its primary pigment, its cyt c6 appears to be more typical of other unicellular cyanobacteria. It is a small acidic protein with molecular mass of 8.85 kDa and a pI near 4. As indicated by CD Spectroscopy, it has an overall alpha helical structure with an estimated 66.1% percentage of its secondary structure being alpha helical. This percentage is slightly higher compared to those of cyt c6 from other organisms with known crystal structures. Cyt c6 from Acaryochloris maxima, Poryphora yeozensis, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Cladophora glomera, and Scenedesmus obliquus have alpha helical secondary structure percentages of 59, 61, 57, 59, and 57%, respectively (http://www.pdb.org/pdb/home/home.do). In addition, it has a high midpoint potential as indicated by redox titrations with an Em equal to +327 ± 2 mV, which is similar to the value found in other cyanobacteria. This similarity has some bearing on the recent debate of the value of the Em of PSI from A. marina.
Hu et al. (1998) reported the Em for P740 in PSI in A. marina to be +335 mV, substantially lower (~100 mV) than PSI of other cyanobacteria. The value was determined by monitoring flash-induced absorbance changes at 740 nm of purified PSI complexes held at different potentials by means of chemical titration. Since the PSI of A. marina absorbs light at a 0.1 eV lower quantum energy than the PSI of chlorophyll a containing cyanobacteria and plants (absorption at 740 nm compared to 700 nm), there may be a decrease in the thermodynamic driving force for the primary electron transfer steps in A. marina compared to chlorophyll a containing species (Hu et al. 1998). The finding of Hu’s study (1998) suggested that the decrease in Em for the PSI of A. marina may compensate for this apparent decrease in the driving force.
However, recent studies by other research groups have determined the Em of P740 in PSI of A. marina to be much higher ranging from +425 to +450 mV, similar to that found in other cyanobacteria (Schelenderin et al. 2008; Bailleul et al. 2008; Tomo et al. 2008). Schelenderin et al. 2008 found the Em to be +450 mV by following flash-induced absorbance changes at 824 nm at varying potential by chemical titration. Bailleul et al. 2008 followed absorbance changes at 740 nm by both chemical and electrochemical titration and reported a value of +425 mV. Finally, Tomo et al. (2008) determined a value of +439 mV by following absorbance changes at different wavelengths including 740 nm by electrochemical titration. Since the primary electron acceptor is not known for A. marina, it has been suggested that it could be a chlorophyll a instead of d and that changes in the Em of the primary acceptor species could compensate for the difference in the energy of light absorbed (Bailleul et al. 2008; Tomo et al. 2008). Furthermore, it could be more important to maintain the high Em for PSI to make it thermodynamically favorable for electron transfer between it and its soluble electron donor, cyt c6 or plastocyanin (Bailleul et al. 2008; Tomo et al. 2008). While it could be possible there is a shift in the Em of the donor as well, this is not the case found in our study where the Em of cyt c6 was determined to be +327 mV, within range of the Em of other cyanobacteria cyt c6 (Bialek et al. 2008; Campos et al. 1993; Diaz-Quintana et al. 2008; Inda et al. 1999; Kerfeld and Krogman 1998; Steiner et al. 2000). This value would be too positive for a favorable transfer between it and PSI if the Hu et al. value is correct, but would have a similar difference in potential to PSI of other cyanobacteria, +324 mV (cyt c6) and +423 mV (PSI) for Themoynechoccous elongates and +320 mV (cyt c6) and +450 mV (PSI) for Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, if the +425 to 450 mV range for A. marina PSI is correct (Cho et al. 1999; Hou and Mauzerall 2006; Nakamura et al. 2005; Proux-Delrouyre et al. 2003).
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the Washington University Mass Spectrometry Resource Center supported by NIH NCRR Grant No. 2P41RR000954 for their assistance. In addition, we would like to thank Jianzhong Wen for his help with the mass spectrometry and Aaron Collins for his help with the CD spectroscopy. This research was supported by a grant from the Exobiology program from NASA.
Abbreviations
- cyt c6
Cytochrome c6
- FPLC
Fast protein liquid chromatography
- IEF
Isoelectrofocusing
- CD
Circular dichroism
- Em
Midpoint potential
- NHE
Normal hydrogen electrode
- A. marina
Acaryochloris marina
- PSI
Photosystem I
- PC
Plastocyanin
- IEC
Ion exchange chromatography
- MALDI-TOF
Matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight
- LC-MS/MS
Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry
- χ
Fraction reduced
- A
Absorbance
- Ao
Absorbance of fully oxidized species
- Ar
Absorbance of fully reduced species
- E
potential
Contributor Information
Patrick D. Bell, Department of Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, Campus Box 1137, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899, USA
Yueyong Xin, Department of Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, Campus Box 1137, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899, USA.
Robert E. Blankenship, Email: blankenship@wustl.edu, Department of Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, Campus Box 1137, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899, USA; Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, Campus Box 1137, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899, USA.
References
- Bailleul B, Johnson X, Finazzi G, Barber J, Rappaport F, Telfer A. The thermodynamics and kinetics of electron transfer between cytochrome b6f and photosystem I in the chlorophyll d-dominated cyanobacterium, Acaryochloris marina. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:25218–25226. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M803047200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bialek W, Nelson M, Tamiola K, Kallas T, Szczepaniak A. Deeply branching c6-like cytochromes of cyanobacteria. Biochemistry. 2008;47:5515–5522. doi: 10.1021/bi701973g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campos A, Aguiar A, Hervas M, Regalla M, Navarro J, Ortega J, Xavier A, De la Rosa M, Texiera M. Cytochrome c6 from Monoraphidium braunii: a cytochrome with an unusual heme axial coordination. Eur J Biochem. 1993;216:329–341. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb18150.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chida H, Nakazawa A, Akazaki H, Hirano T, Suruga K, Ogawa M, Satoh T, Kadokura K, Yamada S, Hakamata W, Isobe K, Ito T, Ishii R, Nishio T, Sonoike K, Oku T. Expression of the algal cytochrome c6 gene in Arabidopsis enhances photosynthesis and growth. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007;48:948–957. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcm064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cho Y, Wang Q, Krogman D, Whitmarsh J. Extinction coefficients and midpoint potentials of cytochrome c6 from the cyanobacteria Arthrospira maxima, Microcystis aeruginosa, and Synechocystis 6803. Biochimica et Biophysica acta. 1999;1413:92–97. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2736(99)00124-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cser K, Deak Z, Telfer A, Barber J, Vass I. Energetics of photosystem II charge recombination in Acaryochloris marina studied by thermoluminescence and flash-induced chlorophyll fluorescence measurements. Photosynth Res. 2008;98:131–140. doi: 10.1007/s11120-008-9373-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De la Cerda B, Diaz-Quintana A, Navarro J, Hervas M, De la Rosa M. Site-directed mutagenesis of cytochrome c6 from Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. The heme protein possesses a negatively charged area that may be isofunctional with the acidic patch of plastocyanin. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:13292–13297. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.19.13292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Diaz-Quintana A, Navarro J, Hervas M, Molina-Heredia F, De la Cerda B, De la Rosa M. A comparative structural and functional analysis of cyanobacterial plastocyanin and cytochrome c6 as alternative electron donors to photosystem I. Photosynth Res. 2003;75:97–110. doi: 10.1023/A:1022841513592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Diaz-Quintana A, Hervas M, Navarro J, De la Rosa M. Plastocyanin and cytochrome c6: the soluble electron carriers between the cytochrome b6f complex and photosystem I. In: Fromme P, editor. Photosytnethic protein complexes: a structural approach. GaA, Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmBH & Co K; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Dutton P. Redox potentiometry: determination of midpoint potentials of oxidation-reduction components of biological electron-transfer systems. Methods Enzymol. 1978;54:411–435. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(78)54026-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hou H, Mauzerall D. The A-Fx to FA/B step in Synechostis 6803 photosystem I is entropy driven. JACS. 2006;128:1580–1586. doi: 10.1021/ja054870y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu Q, Miyashita H, Iwasaki I, Kurano N, Miyachi S, Iwaki M, Itoh S. A photosystem I reaction center driven by chlorophyll d in oxygenic photosynthesis. PNAS. 1998;95:13319–13323. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.22.13319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Inda L, Erdner D, Peleato M, Anderson D. Cytochrome c6 isolated from the marine diatom Thalassiosira weissflogi. Phytochemistry. 1999;51:1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Kerfeld C, Krogman D. Photosynthetic cytochromes c in cyanobacteria, algae, and plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol. 1998;49:397–425. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marcaida M, Schlarb-Ridley B, Worrall J, Wastl J, Evans T, Bendall D, Luisi B, Howe C. Structure of cytochrome c6A, a novel dithio-cytochrome of Arabidopsis thaliana, and its reactivity with plastocyanin: implications for function. J Mol Biol. 2006;360:968–977. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.05.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Medina M, Diaz A, Hervaz M, Navarro J, Gomez-Marino C, de la rosa M, Tollin G. A comparative laser-flash absorption spectroscopy study of Anabaena PCC 7119 plastocyanin and cytochrome c6 photooxidation by photosystem I particles. Eur J Biochem. 1993;213:1133–1138. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb17863.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller S, Augustine S, Olson T, Blankenship R, Selker J, Wood A. Discovery of a free-living chlorophyll d- producing cyanobacterium with a hybrid proteobacterial/cyanobacterial subunit rRNA gene. PNAS. 2005;102:850–855. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405667102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miyashita H, Ikemoto H, Kurano N, Adachi K, Chihara M, Miyachi S. Chlorophyll d as a major pigment. Nature. 1996;383:402. [Google Scholar]
- Nakamura A, Suzawa T, Kato Y, Watanbe T. Significant species dependence of P700 redox potential as verified by spectroelectrochemistry: comparison of spinach and Thermosynnechoccus elongatus. FEBS Lett. 2005;579:2273–2276. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.02.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ohashi S, Miyashita H, Okada N, Iemura T, Watanabe T, Kobayashi M. Unique photosystems in Acaryochloris marina. Photosynth Res. 2008;98:141–149. doi: 10.1007/s11120-008-9383-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Proux-Delrourye V, Demaille C, Leibl W, Setif P, Bottin H, Bourdillon C. Electrocatalytic investigation of lightinduced electron transfer between cytochrome c6 and photosystem I. JACS. 2003;125:13686–13692. doi: 10.1021/ja0363819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Renger T, Schlodder E. The primary electron donor of photosystem II of the cyanobacterium Acaryochloris marina is a chlorophyll d and the water oxidation is driven by a chlorophyll a/chlorophyll d heterodimer. J Phys Chem B. 2008;112:7351–7354. doi: 10.1021/jp801900e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schlenderin M, Cetin M, Schlodder E, Benson S, Sharma P, Barber J, Telfer A. Reassessment of the redox potential of P740: the primary electron donor in photosystem I of the chlorophyll d containing cyanobacterium Acaryochloris marina. In: Allen J, Gantt E, Golbeck J, Osmond B, et al., editors. Photosynthesis: energy from the Sun: 14th International Congress on Photosynthesis; Springer, New York. 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Steiner J, Serrano A, Allmaeir G, Jakowitsch J, Loffelhardt W. Cytochrome c6 from Cyanophora paradoxa Characterization of the protein and the cDNA of the precursor and import into isolated cyanelles. Eur J Biochem. 2000;267:4232–4241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Swingley W, Hohmann-Marriot M, Olsen T, Blankenship R. Effects of iron on growth and ultrastructure of Acaryochloris marina. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:8606–8610. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.12.8606-8610.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Swingley W, Chen M, Cheung C, Conrad A, Dejesa L, Hao J, Honchak B, Karbach L, Kurdoglu A, Lahiri S, Mastrian D, Miyashita H, Page L, Ramakrishna P, Satoh S, Sattley W, Shimada Y, Taylor H, Tomo T, Tsuchiya T, Wang Z, Raymond J, Mimuro M, Blankenship R. Niche adaptation and genome expansion in the chlorophyll d-producing cyanobacterium Acaryochloris marina. PNAS. 2008;105:2005–2010. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709772105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tomo T, Kato Y, Suzuki T, Akimoto S, Okubo T, Noguchi T, Hasewaga K, Tohru T, Tanaka K, Michitaka Fukuya, Naoshi Dohmae, Watanbe T, Mimuro M. Characterization of highly purified photosystem I complexes from the chlorophyll d-dominated cyanobacterium Acaryochloris MBIC 11017. JBC. 2008;283:18198–18209. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M801805200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wen J, Zhang H, Gross M, Blankenship R. Membrane orientation of the FMO antenna protein from Chlorobaculum tepidum as determined by mass spectrometry-based footprinting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901691106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Worrall J, Schlarb-Ridley B, Reda T, Maracaida M, Moorlen R, Wastl J, Hirst J, Bendall D, Luisi B, Howe C. Modulation of heme redox potential in the cytochrome c6 family. JACS. 2007;129:9468–9475. doi: 10.1021/ja072346g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]







