Abstract
Loss of vital functions in the somatic motor and sensory nervous systems can be induced by severe peripheral nerve transection with a long gap following trauma. In such cases, autologous nerve grafts have been used as the gold standard, with the expectation of activation and proliferation of graft-concomitant Schwann cells associated with their paracrine effects. However, there are a limited number of suitable sites available for harvesting of nerve autografts due to the unavoidable sacrifice of other healthy functions. To overcome this problem, the potential of skeletal muscle-derived multipotent stem cells (Sk-MSCs) was examined as a novel alternative cell source for peripheral nerve regeneration. Cultured/expanded Sk-MSCs were injected into severely crushed sciatic nerve corresponding to serious neurotmesis. After 4 weeks, engrafted Sk-MSCs preferentially differentiated into not only Schwann cells, but also perineurial/endoneurial cells, and formed myelin sheath and perineurium/endoneurium, encircling the regenerated axons. Increased vascular formation was also observed, leading to a favorable blood supply and waste product excretion. In addition, engrafted cells expressed key neurotrophic and nerve/vascular growth factor mRNAs; thus, endocrine/paracrine effects for the donor/recipient cells were also expected. Interestingly, skeletal myogenic capacity of expanded Sk-MSCs was clearly diminished in peripheral nerve niche. The same differentiation and tissue reconstitution capacity of Sk-MSCs was sufficiently exerted in the long nerve gap bridging the acellular conduit, which facilitated nerve regeneration/reconnection. These effects represent favorable functional recovery in Sk-MSC-treated mice, as demonstrated by good corduroy walking. We also demonstrated that these differentiation characteristics of the Sk-MSCs were comparable to native peripheral nerve-derived cells, whereas the therapeutic capacities were largely superior in Sk-MSCs. Therefore, Sk-MSCs can be a novel/suitable alternative cell source for healthy nerve autografts.
Introduction
Traumatic peripheral nerve injury can be caused by mechanical trauma such as penetration, crush, traction and lacerations, and may also be associated with long bone fractures, such as those occurring in traffic accidents [1], [2]. Generally, these injuries are classified according to two international standards: the Seddon and the Sunderland [3], [4]. The most serious of these injuries is Seddon’s neurotmesis, equivalent to Sunderland’s fifth degree, which represents complete transection of the nerve, and appropriate surgical treatment is absolutely imperative. For simple transection of the nerve, direct end-to-end suture is possible. In many cases, however, the distance between the proximal and distal stumps is too large to allow direct suture. In such cases, autologous nerve grafts have been used as the gold standard [5], with the expectation of proliferation and activation of nerve graft-associated Schwann cells, which then produce a variety of neurotrophic factors and cytokines, leading to cell adhesion and axonal regeneration [6]. However, the use of autologous nerve grafts for bridging defects requires the sacrifice of healthy nerves, and there are a limited number of suitable sites available for harvesting. Therefore, in the development of alternative sources for nerve autografts, scaffold bridging, which could be of synthetic or biological origin or be resorbable or non-resorbable, has been studied. However, it appears clear that acellular conduits do not facilitate nerve regeneration across long gaps [5].
Acellular conduits are associated with several cell sources, such as Schwann cells and/or Schwann-like cells induced from cultivated bone morrow stromal cells [7], olfactory ensheathing cells [8] and adipose tissue-derived cells [9], and have been investigated as alternatives to autografts, but it is unlikely that these could match or exceed the performance of autografts. Although Schwann cells play a central role in peripheral nerve regeneration, the formation of the endoneurium and/or perineurium by endoneurial fibroblasts and perineurial cells are also important because of their protective role in axons with Schwann cells and the myelin sheath. In particular, the perineurium plays an important role in preventing the passing of large molecules from the epineurium into perineurial fascicles, which is also known as the “blood-nerve-barrier” system [10]. Reconstitution of vascular networks is an inevitable factor in tissue reconstruction. In this regard, cell sources that can give rise to Schwann cells are associated with the capacity to form perineurium/endoneurium, and blood vessels are considered to be the best source for peripheral nerve regeneration.
We previously reported that skeletal muscle interstitium contained multipotent stem cells, as they were Sk-34 (CD34+/45−) and Sk-DN (CD34−/45−) cells [11], [12]. These cells were able to differentiate into mesodermal cells (skeletal muscle cells, vascular smooth muscle cells, pericytes and endothelial cells) and ectodermal cells (Schwann cells and perineurial cells) in vivo, and typically exerted synchronized reconstitution of the muscular, vascular and peripheral nervous system in severely damaged skeletal muscle [13]–[15]. This multipotency was confirmed by clonal cell culture and transplantation [11], [12], [15], and the hierarchy of these cells is such that Sk-DN cells are situated upstream of Sk-34 cells in the same lineage [16],[17]. These capacities of skeletal muscle-derived multipotent stem cells (Sk-MSCs) wholly match the demands in peripheral nerve regeneration, except for skeletal myogenesis.
In the present study, we used mixed cell populations isolated from skeletal muscle, which were mainly containing Sk-34and Sk-DN cells, with the aim of assessing their therapeutic utility. We also used the “severe nerve crush injury model” to simulate Seddon’s axonotmesis and/or the Sunderland’s fourth degree, which involves loss of axons, endoneurial tubes, perineurial fasciculi and vascular networks, while continuity of the epineurium is maintained. Therefore, multiple stimulation for peripheral nerves and vascular lineage cells (such as Schwann, endoneurial/perineurial cells and vascular cells) and synergistic effects of transplanted cells are expected. Using this model, we examined the differentiation capacity and contributions of Sk-MSCs in peripheral nerve regeneration. We also applied Sk-MSCs to transected long nerve gap therapy bridging via an acellular conduit. We found that Sk-MSCs differentiated into all of the peripheral nerve support cells, and reconstituted about 94% of transected axons in the long nerve gap, representing the most suitable stem cells for long nerve gap therapy. Experiments using bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), sciatic nerve-derived cells (SNDCs) and healthy nerve grafts were also performed as comparative studies.
Results
Evaluation of Nerve Crush Injury Model
The validity of the present severe nerve crush injury model was first evaluated in detail ( Fig. 1 ). We applied crush damage along a 7-mm section using forceps ( Fig. 1A, B ) and confirmed several intermittent and complete disruptions of nerve fibers ( Fig. 1C, D ), whereas continuous epineurium (envelope surrounding the entire nerve) was evident in this crush model (arrows in Fig. 1E ), meeting the criteria for Sunderland’s fourth degree. At 4 weeks after transplantation, engrafted Sk-MSCs, BMSCs and SNDCs were detectable as GFP+ tissues under fluorescence stereomicroscopy. Stronger and widespread emissions could be seen after Sk-MSC transplantation than in BMSC and SNDC, with the expectation of greater engraftment ability as a constant trend throughout the experiment ( Fig. 1F–H ).
In the present study, we performed 7 types of transplantation in the sciatic nerve crush injury model; 3 types of Sk-MSC (freshly isolated, and -3d- and -7d cultured), 2 types of BMSC (freshly isolated and -7d cultured) and 2 types of SNDC (freshly isolated from intact and 4-day post-damaged nerves). The results of successful engraftments and total number of animal usage are summarized in Table 1 . Typically, unsuccessful engraftments were observed with freshly isolated BMSC and fresh-intact SNDC. These results correspond to the previously reported impaired nerve regeneration by undifferentiated BMSCs [18], [19], and also suggest that the regeneration capacity of non-stimulated cells in the sciatic nerve is impaired. Therefore, these two groups were subsequently excluded. In addition, unexpected cell fusion following Sk-MSCs transplantation was not fully detected in the confirmation experiment using the Cre-loxP system.
Table 1. Summary of transplanted cells into nerve crush injury model, and engraftment results.
Cell type | Condition (the number of animal usage) | Result |
Skeletal muscle-derived multipotent stem cells(Sk-MSC) | Freshly isolated (n = 41) | Success |
3 day cultured (Sk-MSC-3d) (n = 73) | Success | |
7 day cultured (Sk-MSC-7d) (n = 59) | Success | |
Bone marrow stromal cells (BMSC) | Freshly isolated (n = 5) | Non-success |
7 day cultured (BMSC-7d) (n = 16) | Success | |
Sciatic nerve-derived cells (SNDC) | Freshly isolated from non-damaged (intact) nerve (n = 5) | Non-success |
Freshly isolated from damaged (crashed) nerve (n = 11) | Success | |
Cre-loxp mice (Sk-MSC) | 3 day cultured (Sk-MSC-3d) (n = 10, one for donor and 4 for recipientswith respect to one another) | Non-success |
Successful engraftments were determined by the fluorescence stereomicroscope and with the following histological analysis. As results, successful engraftments could be obtained in all three types of Sk-MSC (fleshly isolated, 3d cultured, and 7d cultured), 7d cultured BMSC, and SNDC isolated from 4d post-damaged sciatic nerve. Note that sufficient expansion of the BMSC could not obtained within 3 days, and SNDC was not able to culture under normal plane condition as used in the Sk-MSC and BMSC, thus, there were excluded from the experimental setting.
Cellular Engraftment and Quantitative Analysis of Regenerated Axons, Myelin and Blood Vessels in Sk-MSC, BMSC and SNDC Transplanted Nerves
In order to evaluate the contributions of transplanted cells to damaged nerve recovery, relative engraftment ratio and number of regenerated axons, myelin and blood vessels in the damaged portion was counted in each cross-section ( Fig. 2 ). Comparisons were performed among Sk-MSC-7d (n = 9) and BMSC-7d (n = 7), SNDC-D (n = 6) and medium control (MC, n = 5) groups based on the values in intact controls (n = 5, dotted lines in Fig. 2M–P ). Sk-MSC-7d showed a significantly greater engraftment ratio when compared to the BMSC-7d and SNDC-D groups, and the values in latter two groups were similar (see Fig. 2A–C, M ). The number of axons and myelin signals were similar in all four groups ( Fig. 2N, O ), and were largely the same as the levels seen in intact controls, thus suggesting natural/spontaneous recovery occurs within 4 weeks. Therefore, donor cell engraftments were considered to work together with recipient cells during natural healing. Importantly, all four groups showed a significantly higher number of blood vessels than intact controls in the following order: Sk-MSC>DNDC-D>BMSC-7d>MC, with the values of Sk-MSC-7d and SNDC-D being significantly greater when compared with the other two groups ( Fig. 2P ). Taken together, it is likely that natural/spontaneous nerve regeneration is basically induced following increases in the number of blood vessels within the 4-wk recovery period in the present crush injury model, and this trend was most prominent in the Sk-MSC group. Increased blood vessel formation may contribute sufficient oxygen and nutrition supply, as well as removal of waste products, and lead to faster recovery of damaged nerve fibers.
Cellular Differentiation of Sk-MSCs, BMSCs and SNDCs in Damaged Nerve Niche
At 4 week after transplantation, transplanted sciatic nerves in the three groups in Fig. 2 were histologically analyzed by higher magnifications ( Fig. 3 and 4 ). Vigorous formation of GFP+ perineurium/endoneurium encircling single and/or multiple axons and myelin were evident as typical characteristics of Sk-MSC-7d transplantation ( Fig. 3A, B ). Several claudin+ reactions were located on GFP+ perineurium showing formation of tight junctions [20], [21] by donor-derived cells ( Fig. 3C ). Double positive reactions for GFP/MBP were also observed as proof of myelin formation by donor-derived Schwann cells ( Fig. 3D ). In addition, incorporation of donor-derived GFP+ endothelial (CD31+) cells with blood vessels inside of nerve bundle ( Fig. 3E ) were frequently observed (but not all cases). Similar contributions were also observed in the large conduit blood vessels located outside the nerve bundle ( Fig. 3F ), and GFP+ tissues extended from the tunica media to the adventitia in this case. These multiple contributions for the vascular system correspond to the original reported function of Sk-MSCs exerted in damaged skeletal muscle niche [13] – [15] . Thus, transplanted donor-derived Sk-MSC-7d actively differentiated into Schwann and perineurial/endoneurial cells, in addition to vascular-related cells and contributed to nerve and vascular reconstitution. All of these trends were consistently observed in Sk-MSC-3d (described below) and Sk-MSC-7d transplantation.
After SNDC-D transplantation, the same characteristics of the above Sk-MSC-7d were observed ( Fig. 4A–C ). However, the expansion was apparently smaller than with Sk-MSC-7d as a result of the significantly lower engraftment ratio in SNDC-D (see Fig. 2M ). Therefore, the differentiation capacities of Sk-MSCs and SNDCs were basically the same in the damaged peripheral nerve niche, but the engraftment capacity was significantly higher in Sk-MSCs.
After BMSC-7d transplantation, the trend was apparently different from the other two groups ( Fig. 4D–F ). There was no definitive formation of perineurium/endoneurium or incorporation into CD31+ blood vessels. Instead, axons with very small diameter and thin/weak reactions for MBP were prominent. In addition, hollow cavity-like structures around engrafted GFP+ tissues (cells) were frequently observed. Interestingly, some osteogenesis was observed in one case ( Fig. 4G, H ).
The differentiation of engrafted Sk-MSC-7d and SNDC-D into Schwann cells, as well as the formation of perineurium, was also strictly assessed by immunoelectron microscopy ( Fig. 5A–B and E–F ). However, after BMSC-7d transplantation, fibroblast-like structures located between Schwann cells and perineuriums with no other assertive characteristics were detected ( Fig. 5C–D ). Therefore, the cause-and-effect relationship of BMSC transplantation was unclear in the present study, in contrast to other Sk-MSC-7d and SNDC-D.
Expression of mRNAs Specific to Peripheral Nerve, Vascular and Skeletal Muscle Lineages Before and After Transplantation
Relative expression of specific mRNAs in Sk-MSCs was compared to that in native SNDCs before and after transplantation. Thirty-six markers were selected in relation to cellular commitment, growth and regeneration of peripheral nerves, blood vessels, skeletal muscle and common factors ( Fig. 6 , and Table S1).
No clear expression was detected in freshly isolated SNDCs from intact sciatic nerve; thus, this was considered to be the normal state ( Fig. 6C ). However, uniform and strong expression of three categories other than skeletal muscle lineage were observed in freshly isolated SNDC from 4 days after damage, and was considered to be the regenerative response of native peripheral nerve tissue ( Fig. 6C ). Based on these responses, freshly isolated Sk-MSCs showed expression in the above 4 categories, and this was consistently enhanced to maximum during expansion culture (-3d to -7d in Fig. 6A ), except for GFAP. This clearly indicates that Sk-MSCs are suitable for nerve regeneration rescue, while skeletal myogenic marker expression is strong. As a comparative control, freshly isolated BMSCs showed relatively strong expression of vascular-related factors, but the remaining factors were enhanced after 7 days of culture, except for skeletal muscle factors and Sox10 ( Fig. 6B ). In this regard, it was likely that preliminary expression of specific mRNAs and actual cell differentiation after transplantation did not always correspond, as was observed in BMSC-7d. Importantly, the supportive paracrine effects of these transplanted cells were indicated by the increased number of vascular supplies in the damaged nerve ( Fig. 2P ).
We also analyzed expression in re-isolated Sk-MSC-3d and -7d at 7, 12, 17 days and 4 weeks after transplantation in order to follow differentiation during nerve regeneration ( Fig. 6D, E ). Strong expression of skeletal myogenic mRNAs, which was observed before transplantation, diminished gradually after transplantation ( Fig. 6A vs. D, E ). These decreases were relatively fast at Sk-MSC-7d, as compared to -3d cultured cells ( Fig. 6D vs. E ). Therefore, longer culture periods may induce preferential attenuation of the myogenic potential of Sk-MSCs after transplantation, while expression of the remaining 3 categories was consistently/continuously maintained in both -3d and -7d preparations. In addition, the pattern of Sk-MSC-7d at 17 days closely resembled that of SNDC-D ( Fig. 6C vs. E ). These results suggest that ideal milieu-dependent cell differentiations and paracrine effects occur in Sk-MSCs following transplantation. Five mice were used for analysis at each stage in both groups.
In Vivo Differentiation Potential of Re-isolated Sk-MSC-3d After “2nd Transplantation” Into Damaged Skeletal Muscle and Sciatic Nerve
In order to further confirm the results of previous RT-PCR analysis ( Fig. 6 ), re-isolated Sk-MSC-3d were re-transplanted (hereinafter, 2nd transplantation) into the damage skeletal muscle and sciatic nerve to analyze the retention differentiation potential in vivo ( Fig. 7 ).
In damaged skeletal muscle, when Sk-MSC-3d were directly transplanted into the damaged muscle (as the 1st transplantation), there was a large number of GFP+ muscle fibers near the N-200+ nerve bundles ( Fig. 7E ), representing vigorous skeletal myogenesis. However, in the 2nd transplantation of 7d-re-isolated Sk-MSC-3d, few GFP+ muscle fibers were detected, whereas contributions to vascular and peripheral nerve tissues were observed ( Fig. 7A–C ). There was no donor cell-derived muscle fiber formation in the rest of the re-isolated cells thereafter, and engraftment capacity itself also apparently reduced in the case of 4wk-re-isolated cells ( Fig. 7D ). This was similar to the case when original SNDC-D were directly transplanted into damaged skeletal muscle niche ( Fig. 7F ). These results supported the above RT-PCR data ( Fig. 6 ). It is therefore likely that the capacity of Sk-MSCs in skeletal muscle niche is reduced after the 1st transplantation into the damaged sciatic nerve.
In contrast, the reverse trend was observed after the 2nd transplantation into damaged sciatic nerve niche, as diminished engraftment capacity was observed for 7d re-isolated Sk-MSC-3d ( Fig. 7G ). This subsequently recovered gradually ( Fig. 7H ) and vigorous engraftment was observed in the 4wk-re-isolated cells ( Fig. 7I ). The trends for engrafted re-isolated Sk-MSC-3d ( Fig. 7J–L ) were similar to those for the 1st transplantation (see Figs. 2 and 3 ) and SNDC-D transplantation ( Fig. 4A–C ). Thus, cellular instability of Sk-MSCs is apparently induced in the first 2 weeks after transplantation, and after losing their original myogenic differentiation capacity, suspended cells may be discarded. However, cellular adaptation of transplanted Sk-MSCs progresses gradually and is largely accomplished within 4 weeks, resulting in activated peripheral nerve cells such as in SNDC-D. Note, the engraftment capacity of re-isolated Sk-MSCs was apparently higher than that of the original SNDC-D (compare Fig. 7I vs. Fig. 4A–C ), but the reasons are unclear.
Disappearance of Skeletal Myogenic Cells in Damaged Sciatic Nerve
In order to follow up the results in Fig. 6 and Fig. 7 , disappearance of skeletal myogenesis in Sk-MSC-3d in damaged nerve niche was successively analyzed from 7 days to 4 weeks after transplantation using immunohistochemistry and immunoelectron microscopy ( Fig. 8 ). The results clearly indicated that SkMA+ cells were present at 7 days after transplantation ( Fig. 8A ). At 17 days, however, the number of SkMA+ cells decreased markedly, with weak reactions for anti-SkMA and attenuation of GFP emission observed ( Fig. 8B, C ), probably due to the degenerative phase of myogenic cells. Degenerative features were also confirmed by immunoelectron microscopy at 17 days after transplantation, including central nuclei with fewer myofibrils, even after sufficient time for differentiation ( Fig. 8D, E ). Interestingly, when freshly isolated Sk-MSCs were transplanted into the damaged nerve, there were numerous cells that were strongly positive for SkMA, even at 4 weeks after injection ( Fig. 5E ). This suggests that the myogenic potential of freshly isolated Sk-MSCs was too strong to be eliminated by the damaged nerve niche. We also performed the same analysis for Sk-MSC-7d, and compared the residual ratio of SkMA+ cells at 17 days after transplantation among the three groups. The results were as follows: freshly isolated (100%, 8/8)>-3d culture (50%, 9/18)>-7d culture (33%, 7/21). SkMA+ cells remained present even after 4 weeks in the case of freshly isolated cells, but had disappeared completely in the other two groups. Based on the results in Fig. 6 , 7 and 8 , it was clear that the myogenic potential of Sk-MSC in vivo is affected by culture conditions before transplantation; thus, the myogenic potential of Sk-MSC is controllable before transplantation.
Characterization of Sk-MSC-3d and SNDC-D Before Transplantation by FACS
As described above, Sk-MSCs and SNDCs showed similar differentiation/contribution patterns in damaged nerve niche; therefore, the characteristics of these cells were analyzed using several surface cell markers and FACS ( Fig. 9A and E ). Typical differences were observed in the distributions of cells positive for CD31, CD34 and CD44. Sk-MSC-3d showed fewer CD31+ and abundant CD34+ cells, and no CD44−/p75+ cells, as compared with SNDC-D (compare Fig. 9A and E ). In addition, bipolar p75+ cells independent of myogenic cells were observed, thus suggesting the presence of Schwann-progenitor cells in the muscle ( Fig. 9B–D ). However, when Sk-MSC-3d were sorted into 4 fractions as 34+/p75−, 34+/p75+, 34−/p75+ and 34−/p75− cells (upper-left of Fig. 9A ), and were transplanted into the damaged sciatic nerve, the same differentiation/contribution was observed at 4 weeks post-surgery (data not shown). This suggests that Schwann and perineurial/endoneurial progenitor cells are equally distributed in the p75+/− and/or CD34+/− fractions, as well as vascular-related progenitor cells. Therefore, surface marker characteristics of the Sk-MSC did not show any specific patterns in the present case. In this regard, total cell expansion/transplantation is able to more accurately assess cell number for therapy.
Therapeutic Capacity of Sk-MSC-7d Vs. Healthy Nerve Grafts for Transected Long Nerve Gap with Acellular Conduit
In order to test the therapeutic efficacy of Sk-MSC for the transected long nerve gap, a 7-mm nerve gap was bridged using an acellular conduit into which Sk-MSC-7d were injected (Fig. S1A–C). The healthy nerve graft was also set into a central portion of the conduit as a control experiment (Fig. S1D–F).
After 4 weeks, engrafted GFP+ donor cells/tissues stretched back to the proximal portion of the recipient nerve ( Fig. 10A ). In the immunohistochemical analysis, the conduit was filled with GFP+ cells/tissues, and counts for N200 (axon), MBP (myelin) and CD31 (blood vessels) in the central portion of conduit were 1847±578 (40% recovery compared to normal intact nerve), 993±413 (31%) and 68±18 (252%, 2.5-fold increase), respectively (n = 4). These values were less than those in normal intact nerve (4625±470, 3179±760 and 27±4; see legend of Fig. 2 ) at this time point. Importantly, the most axons were encircled by GFP+ perineurium associated with a 2.5-fold increase in the number of blood vessels in the central portion of the conduit ( Fig. 10B–D ). This trend suggests that axonal elongation and myelination require a precursive perineurial/endoneurial guide and blood vessel supply. These properties were exerted in the distal half of the conduit, as represented in the longitudinal sections ( Fig. 10E–H ), and the regenerated/extended axons in the conduit reached the distal donor-recipient junction ( Fig. 10F ). A delay in myelin formation, as compared to the axon, in the junctional portion was also indicated, whereas uniform vascular formation throughout the conduit could be seen ( Fig. 10G, H ). Thus, a favorable supply of oxygen and nutrition with disposal of waste products could be expected.
After 8 weeks, the above properties were further enhanced ( Fig. 11 ). Engrafted donor derived GFP+ cells showed the exactly same profiles as in the former injection experiment ( Fig. 11A–I vs. Fig. 3 ). Therefore, Sk-MSCs fully exerted the same potential observed in crushed nerve niche, even in the nerveless bridging conduit. In addition, spreading of GFP+ cells/tissue beyond the conduit portion and subsequent introduction into the retaining recipient nerve portions on both the proximal and distal sides was observed during expansion from 4 to 8 weeks ( Fig. 10A vs. 11A ). Therefore, it is likely that donor cell proliferation/differentiation continuously occurred during 4 to 8 weeks after surgery. Mean number of axons, myelin signals and blood vessels in the conduit were N200 = 4328±2026, MBP = 1886±1666 and CD31 = 245±55, which indicated 94%, 60% recovery and 907% (9.1 fold increase) vs. intact nerve, respectively (n = 5).
At 8 weeks after nerve graft transplantation, some GFP+ cells/tissues were observed around the central portion of the conduit ( Fig. 12A ), indicating the limited spread of donor cells. Importantly, donor-derived formation of perineurium/endoneurium and blood vessels was scarcely observed except for myelin; thus, the contribution of nerve grafts was limited by Schwann cell supply ( Fig. 12B–K ). Mean numbers of axons, myelin signals and blood vessels in the conduit were N200 = 1663±564 (36% recovery vs. intact nerve), MBP = 824±365 (26% recovery) and CD31 = 145±46 (550%, as 5.5 fold increase, n = 4).
In addition, when surgery was performed using the conduit only (medium+conduit), counts were N200 = 977±771 (21% vs. intact), MBP = 722±585 (23%) and CD31 = 47±14 (177%, 1.7 fold, n = 5). If no conduit was used, the transected nerve gap (7 mm) was scarcely bridged. Therefore, based on the results of nerve graft and medium, the efficacy of the nerve graft was not so large.
These morphological and quantitative data were clearly representative of in vivo behavioral functions, such as narrow corduroy walking at 8 weeks after complete nerve transection with a 7-mm gap. The narrow corduroy walking scores among three groups were 4.3±0.6 in Sk-MSCs (n = 10), 3.4±0.5 in nerve graft (n = 3) and 1.6±0.6 in media only (n = 5). Representative results are shown as Movies S1 and S2 (available at URL). As a whole, Sk-MSCs treated mice showed good body balanced locomotion with stable walking (Movie S1, grade 5), whereas non-treated (conduit+media) mice tended to limp with every step and had poor balance (Movie S2, grade 1). The significance of the above quantitative and functional data for the long nerve gap model at 8 weeks after surgery is summarized in Figure 13.
Discussion
The first main finding of the present study is that expanded Sk-MSCs preferentially/sufficiently exert their original nerve-blood vessel reconstitution potential, even in damaged peripheral nerve niche with dissolved skeletal myogenic potential. Engrafted donor-derived Sk-MSCs differentiated into all of the main component cells of peripheral nerve support tissues in the severely crushed nerve niche, and enhanced formation of large and small blood vessels was also observed inside/outside the nerve fascicles. Therefore, there were no disadvantages with regard to axonal regrowth resulting from this transplantation. A 10-fold increase in the number of blood vessels appeared in/around the damaged portion when with the intact nerve. This is considered to be a beneficial effect for nerve regeneration, as invasive tissue constructs need to be one step ahead of vascular regeneration in order to ensure adequate delivery of oxygen and nutrients and removal of waste products during regeneration. In addition, the cellular behaviors of engrafted Sk-MSCs were basically the same as those of freshly isolated cells from damaged sciatic nerve (SNDC-D). To the best of our knowledge, stem cells showing suitable multipotency in damaged nerve-specific niche have never been reported. Therefore, it is possible that the Sk-MSCs are the best alternative cell source for peripheral nerve regeneration therapy.
The perineurium plays a very important role as a protective barrier for endoneurial content against the possible noxious influence of external forces and various macromolecules to maintain the neural microenvironment [22], [23]. The perineurium is composed connective tissues, which prevent the passage of large molecules from the epineurium into the nerve fascicle, constituting the “blood-nerve-barrier” system. As expected, donor-derived GFP+ perineurium had claudin+ tight-junctions, which played a key role in the “blood-nerve-barrier” system, representing functional reconstitution. In nerve fascicles, each individual nerve fiber is further surrounded by the endoneurium. The endoneurium is a thin layer of connective tissue that forms a tubular structure containing the components of nerve fibers such as axons, the myelin sheath and Schwann cells. Thus, the endoneurium is stronger than the axons, and separates and protects them to maintain signal (action potentials) isolation and to establish a delicate communication system within the neuron.
For the above reasons, the second main finding of the present study is that expanded Sk-MSC-7d sufficiently exerts their multiple nerve reconstitution capacity in the bridging acellular conduit for long nerve gaps. In contrast to the nerve crush injury model, inside the bridging conduit is empty space. Nevertheless, transplanted Sk-MSCs developed all peripheral nerve support tissues associated with vigorous induction of blood vessel formation in the conduit. Apparently greater axonal regrowth and myelin formation compared to healthy nerve graft transplantation (about 2.5-hold) was then observed in the conduit, and the transected nerve gap was reconnected within 8 weeks (about 94% recovery vs. intact nerve). The reasons for this difference between Sk-MSCs and nerve graft are thought to be as follows: the nerve graft derived cells showed 1) a lack of contribution to perineurium/endoneurium construction, and blood vessel formation, and 2) a lower migration capacity (see Fig. 12 ). Although nerve graft transplantation showed active contributions to myelin formation, it was insufficient for regenerating the transected nerves. In addition, dedifferentiated Schwann cells in the graft tend to show less mobility in the conduit, because some axonal support can be limitedly observed around the graft portion. Thus, active migration capacity of the Sk-MSCs in and over the conduit (see Fig. 10 and 11 ) also benefits long nerve gap regeneration. According to several reports, perineurial cells are the first cells to reconnect the proximal and distal stumps after the experimental peripheral nerve lesion, and thereby form a guiding structure for re-growing Schwann cells and axons [23]–[27]. It is therefore possible that the capacity to form perineurium/endoneurium is a major advantage of Sk-MSC transplantation vs. other methods. The present results for the number of regenerative axons in the conduit bridging the long nerve gap are far superior to the results for iPS-derived neurospheres+bioabsorbable conduit transplantation (about 4328 at 8 weeks after implantation vs. 200 at 12 weeks) [28].
Synthesis and expression of several neurotrophic, nerve and vascular growth factors by engrafted Sk-MSCs may also play an important supplemental role in nerve regeneration. The present mRNA analysis clearly indicated that Sk-MSC-d7 actively expressed various key factors for axonal re-growth, Schwann cell growth, myelination and total nerve regeneration before and after transplantation (see Table S1 and Fig. 6 ). In particular, NGF [29], BDNF [30], GDNF [31], Galectin-1 [32], Ninjurin [33], CNTF [34], LIF [35] and Sox10 [36]–[38] are important for nerve regeneration, while VGEF [39] and HGF [40] are important for blood vessels. Some of these are redundant and/or primarily involved in the nerve regeneration process [41]. Sufficient expression of these factors in Sk-MSC-7d before and after transplantation may induce paracrine effects on recipient cells around transplanted sites and engrafted donor cells as an adjuvant for long gap nerve regeneration. The expression pattern of Sk-MSCs at 17 days after transplantation was similar to that in cells in the damaged nerve (freshly isolated damaged SNDC, see Fig. 6 ).
On autologous cell transplantation, easier access to the cell source is another important issue. In this regard, nestin-expressing hair follicle stem cells were reported as a source to treat injured sciatic nerve [42], [43], and it has also been reported that the same type of stem cells are readily isolated from the human scalp [44]. Significant functional recovery when compared to the non-transplanted group was demonstrated using the severed sciatic nerve model after 2 months of mouse-to-mouse transplantation [43]. However, distance in nerve gap and degrees of morphological and functional recovery rate against the normal mice were unclear; thus, it is difficult to perform direct comparisons with the results of the present study. It is clear that these cells tended to show the limited differentiation into Schwann cells in vivo with fewer perineurium/endoneurium formations, and this is a typical difference in the abilities of the present Sk-MSCs. Therefore, it is likely that hair follicle stem cells have superiority over Sk-MSCs with regard to ease of access. We also believe that severe long gap nerve injury is generally associated with large open scarring of skin and muscles. Thus, donor muscle may be accessible from the injured region.
Finally, the above favorable effects of Sk-MSCs for peripheral nerve regeneration were demonstrated based on the differences between treated and non-treated mice with long nerve gap (good narrow corduroy walking in Fig. 13 , and Movie S1 vs. S2). In addition, whether the above Sk-MSC functions in mice are present in human-Sk-MSCs is the most important issue for translational research. For this purpose, we are currently obtaining the same type of Sk-MSCs from human skeletal muscle. Therefore, this method may be highly practical for human nerve repair therapy.
Conclusion
The present expanded Sk-MSCs exhibited comprehensive and preferential reconstitution of severely damaged sciatic nerve, following cellular differentiation into all peripheral nerve support cells, such as Schwann cells and perineurial/endoneurial cells, and formed myelin sheath and perineurium/endoneurium, as well as associated blood vessels composed of donor-derived endothelial cells, pericytes and fibroblasts. This represents a potentially useful tool for nerve regeneration therapy. Skeletal muscle is the largest organ in the body, comprising approximately 40–50% of total body mass, and it presumably allows donor cells to be obtained with relative ease and safety. Therefore, Sk-MSCs are potentially a practical source for autologous stem cell therapy for severe nerve injury.
Materials and Methods
Animals
Green fluorescent protein transgenic mice (GFP-Tg mice; C57BL/6 TgN[act EGFP]Osb Y01, provided by Dr. M. Okabe, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan) [45] were used as donor mice in cell transplantation (age, 3–8 weeks, n = 80), and wild-type mice (C57BL/6N) were used as recipients (age, 8–12 weeks, n = 210). Cre- and loxP-mice [B6. Cg-Tg (CAG-cre, CZ-M020sc; BRC 01828) and (CAG-floxed Neo-EGFP, REP080sb; BRC 02096)] provided by RIKEN BRC, which is participating in the National Bio-Resource Project of MEXT, Japan (age, 3–8 weeks, n = 10), were used for confirmation studies of cell fusion after transplantation. All experimental procedures were approved by the Tokai University School of Medicine Committee on Animal Care and Use.
Purification and Preparation of Transplanted Cells
Skeletal muscle-derived multipotent stem cells (Sk-MSCs) were extracted as follows. Whole muscles from the thigh and lower leg (tibialis anterior, extensor digitorum longus, soleus, plantaris, gastrocnemius and quadriceps femoris) of GFP mice (n = 1–2/experiment) were treated with 0.1% collagenase type IA (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing 7.5% fetal calf serum (FCS) with gentle agitation for 2 hours at 37°C and interstitial cells were extracted. Extracted cells were filtered through 70-µm, 40-µm and 20-µm nylon strainers in order to remove muscle fibers and other debris, and were then washed and resuspended in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM) containing 10% FCS, yielding enzymatically extracted cells. The enzymatically extracted mixed cell population (freshly isolated Sk-MSCs), which included both Sk-34 and Sk-DN cell populations, was cultured in 20% FCS/IMDM for 3 or 7 days and achieved about 15–20-fold cell expansion. Therefore, freshly isolated and 3d- and 7d-cultured Sk-MSCs were transplanted for primary studies. On the other hand, in order to confirm whether spontaneous cell fusion occurs, we performed the same transplantation using Cre and loxp mice in the same manner as above.
Whole bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) were obtained by flushing the tibias and femurs of GFP mice (n = 2–3/experiment). After elimination of red blood cells, freshly isolated BMSCs were obtained. For the expanded BMSCs, obtained whole marrow cells were cultured in 20%FCS/DMEM for 48 hours, and then floating cells were eliminated, with the remaining adhesive cells being cultured for 5 further days (total of 7 days). Thus, freshly isolated and 7d-cultured BMSCs were transplanted in the same manner as Sk-MSCs (comparative study-I). Medium was changed every 2 days for both cultures. We did not use any cytokines or specific-coating plates for both Sk-MSC and BMSC culture in order to compare their native cell differentiation and tissue reconstructive potential without any modification.
Similarly, freshly isolated sciatic nerve-derived cells (SNDCs) were transplanted (comparative study-II). For this purpose, intact and damaged (4 days after crush injury, see below) sciatic nerves on both sides were excised from GFP mice (n = 5/experiment) and minced, and then SNDCs were extracted enzymatically in the same manner as Sk-MSCs, and were transplanted into damaged sciatic nerves. Note that SNDCs are difficult to culture under the same conditions as Sk-MSCs and BMSCs above, and thus were not studied.
In addition, we performed re-transplantation of re-isolated Sk-MSC-3d into both the damaged skeletal muscle and sciatic nerve models (referred to as the 2nd transplantation) to confirm the changes in original differentiation capacity of Sk-MSCs after the 1st transplantation into damaged nerve niche. For this purpose, after transplanted and engrafted GFP+ Sk-MSC-3d were enzymatically re-isolated and sorted by GFP, they were transplanted into damaged skeletal muscle (as described previously [13], [14] and the sciatic nerve. The 2nd transplantation was performed using re-isolated Sk-MSC-3d at 7, 14, and 17 days and at 4 weeks, and re-isolated Sk-MSC-7d at 12 and 17 days after the 1st transplantation.
Nerve Crush Injury Model and Summary of Transplantation Studies
Under inhalation anesthesia (Isoflurane; Abbot, Osaka, Japan), the right sciatic nerve was exposed through a gluteal muscle incision. The sciatic nerve was then repeatedly crushed with forceps for 7 mm along the longitudinal axis ( Fig. 1A ). Complete nerve crush was confirmed by the appearance of translucent bands across the nerve ( Fig. 1B ). In this case, most of the peripheral nerve support tissues were destroyed, except the epineurium, which is the outermost layer of the nerve ( Fig. 1C ). All transplanted cells were suspended in culture media at a concentration of 1×106 cells/6 µl, and 0.5 µl/nerve was injected into the destroyed hollow portion of the nerve through the remaining epineurium using a fine tip glass pipette. The same amounts of media without cells were also injected as a control.
As a whole, the transplantation study was performed as follows: 1) 3 cases of primary studies using Sk-MSCs (freshly isolated, and 3d- and 7d-cultured); 2) 2 cases of BMSC comparative study-I (freshly isolated and 7d-cultured); 3) 2 cases of SNDC comparative study-II (freshly isolated from non-damaged and damaged nerve); 4) media control comparative study-III; and 5) cell fusion confirmation study using Cre-loxp system. The number of animals used in each experiment is summarized in Table 1.
The nerve crush injury model was also used in the 2nd transplantation experiment (see above), as well as the severe muscle damage model described previously [13], [14].
Complete Nerve Transection Model with Long Gap (7 mm)
Furthermore, 3 therapeutic transplantation experiments for transected sciatic nerve regeneration were performed using Sk-MSC-7d, intact nerve graft and medium only. For this purpose, the sciatic nerve was transected, and a 7-mm nerve gap was bridged using an acellular conduit made from 70% ethanol dehydrated (3 days) esophageal submucous membrane (mainly longitudinal muscle layer) from wild-type mice. Separation of submucous membrane was performed after dehydration. Then, the bridging conduit was filled by injection of Sk-MSC-7d, and/or medium. Healthy nerve graft (3.5 mm) was obtained from the GFP mouse, and was set in the central portion of the conduit (Fig. S1). Surgically treated nerves were analyzed at 4 and 8 weeks after surgery in the same manner as the crush injury model above. Functional recovery was assessed by narrow corduroy walking, and these behaviors were recorded as movies. Behavioral status of surgically treated mice was classified into 5 grades (1 = poor, 2 = fair, 3 = average, 4 = good and 5 = excellent) and averaged as narrow corduroy walking scores. Grade 5 also refers to normal control levels.
Macroscopic Observation, Immunostaining and Immunoelectron Microscopy
At the end of each transplantation period, recipient mice were given an overdose of pentobarbital (60 mg/kg, i.p.), and engraftment of donor-derived GFP+ cells into sciatic nerves was confirmed by fluorescence stereomicroscopy (SZX12; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan; as shown in Fig. 1F–H ). Mice were then perfused with warm 0.01 M PBS through the left ventricle, followed by fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde/0.1 M phosphate buffer (4% PFA/PB). Nerves (and/or TA muscles, in some cases) were removed and fixed overnight in 4% PFA/PB, washed with graded sucrose (0–25%)/0.01 M PBS series, embedded in optimum-compound (O.C.T compound; Tissue-Tek, Sakura Finetechnical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and frozen at −80°C. For muscles, samples were quick frozen in isopentane pre-cooled with liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C until use. Subsequently, several 7-µm cross- and longitudinal sections were obtained. Localization of nerve fibers (axons) was detected by rabbit polyclonal anti-Neurofilament 200 (N-200, 1∶1000, room temperature for 1 hour; Sigma, Saint Louis, MO). Myelin formations were detected by rabbit polyclonal anti-myelin basic protein (MBP; 1∶200, room temperature for 2 hours; Millipore, Billerica, MA). Blood vessels were detected using rat anti-mouse CD31 (1∶500, 4°C overnight; BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) monoclonal antibody. Immature Schwann cells were detected using rabbit anti-p75 (1∶400, 4°C overnight; CST, Boston, MA) polyclonal antibody, and rabbit anti-claudin-1 (1∶50, 4°C overnight; Zymed, South San Francisco, CA) was used for identification of tight-junctions in the perineurium and endoneurium (blood-nerve-barrier). Myogenic cells were detected with rabbit polyclonal anti-skeletal muscle actin (1∶300, room temperature for 1 hour; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) in histochemistry, and monoclonal anti-MyoD (1∶50, 4°C overnight; Dako, Carpinteria, CA) in culture. Reactions were visualized using Alexa Fluor-594-conjugated goat anti-rabbit and anti-rat antibodies (1∶500, room temperature for 2 hours; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Nuclei were counter-stained with DAPI (4,6-diamino-2-phenylindole).
For immunoelectron microscopy, sections were stained using rabbit anti-GFP antibody (1∶300, 4°C overnight; Molecular Probes) and HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody (1∶200, 4°C overnight; Dako, Carpinteria, CA). Reactions were visualized with DAB after fixation in 1% glutaraldehyde/0.1M phosphate buffer. Visualized sections were then fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide/0.05M phosphate buffer, and were prepared for electron microscopic analysis. Details of immunoelectron microscopy were as described previously [13], [14].
RT-PCR
In order to test the expression of specific markers for skeletal muscle, peripheral nerve and vascular cell lineages, as well as neurotrophic and vasculogenic factors, bulk cell RT-PCR was performed. Specific primers and analyzed materials are summarized in Table S1. Cells were lysed and total RNA was purified using a QIAGEN RNeasy micro kit. First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed with an Invitrogen SuperScript III system using dT30-containing primer (see above), and specific PCR (35 cycles of 30 seconds at 94°C, 30 seconds at 60–65°C and 2 minutes at 72°C) was performed in a 15-µl volume containing Ex-Taq buffer, 0.8 U of ExTaq-HS-polymerase, 0.7 µM specific sense and antisense primers, 0.2 mM dNTPs and 0.5 µl of cDNA. Analysis was performed on Sk-MSCs, BMSCs, SNDCs before transplantation and re-isolated Sk-MSC-3d and -7d (after transplantation). For cells after transplantation, engraftment of GFP+ cells into sciatic nerves was first confirmed by fluorescence stereomicroscopy ( Fig. 1F–H ), and nerves were detached at almost 15 mm in length, including the GFP+ and GFP- portions. Cells were then extracted by the same procedure as for SNDC preparation, and were sorted into GFP+ and GFP- cell fractions using FACSAria (Becton Dickinson Japan, Tokyo). Cells were then analyzed by specific mRNA expression. Analysis was performed for 4–7 samples in each group and for each set of conditions, and relative expression intensity was classified into 3 levels based on housekeeping control gene levels, and were averaged.
Flow Cytometric Characterization of Sk-MSC-3d and SNDC-D Before Transplantation
Cultured Sk-MSC-3d cells were suspended by trypsin-EDTA (0.05% trypsin, 0.53 mM EDTA; Life Technologies, Tokyo, Japan) and labeled with rat monoclonal anti-mouse CD31 (FITC conjugated, BD or eFluor450 conjugated; eBioscience, San Diego, CA), CD44 (PE-Cy7; BioLegend, San Diego, CA), CD73 (PE, BD or eFluor450; eBioscience), CD105 (PE-Cy7; BioLegend) and CD271 (p75; rabbit polyclonal anti-p75, CST, Boston, MA; and anti-rabbit IgG Dylight 649 or PE, BioLegend, were used as secondary antibodies). Live cells were counted after cells positive for propidium iodide (PI) were excluded as dead cells. All cell analyses and sorting procedure in this study were carried out using FACSAria (Becton Dickinson Japan, Tokyo, Japan). Experiments were repeated three times using 3 mice/experiment in each cell type.
Quantitative Analysis
Relative engraftment ratio and immunohistochemically detected regenerated axons, myelin and blood vessels in the damaged portion were assessed in each whole cross-section ( Fig. 2 ). Relative engraftment ratio was calculated by the percentage of mean GFP+ area/total area on whole nerve cross-sections. Regenerated axons, myelin and blood vessels was also determined in whole cross-sections as the number of positive reactions to ant-N-200, -MBP and -CD31, respectively. Reactions were counted using Stereo-investigator (mbf Bioscience, MicroBrightField, Inc. Williston, VT). Analysis was performed in 4–5 sections per sample, and values were averaged. Values are expressed as means ± SD. The narrow corduroy walking score, which was determined for evaluation of functional recovery after transplantation of Sk-MSC-7d, intact nerve graft and medium only in the long nerve gap model were also compared as means ± SD. Differences between groups were tested by parametric Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test. The level of significance accepted a priori was set at p<0.05.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to our mentor, Mr. A. Akatsuka, for his helpful contributions to our studies.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the grant 2013 Tokai University School of Medicine, Project Research. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Robinson LR (2000) Traumatic injury to peripheral nerves. Muscle Nerve 23: 863–873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Robinson PP, Boissonade FM, Loescher AR, Smith KG, Yates JM, et al. (2004) Peripheral mechanisms for the initiation of pain following trigeminal nerve injury. J Orofac Pain 18: 287–292. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Seddon HJ, Medawar PB, Smith H (1943) Rate of regeneration of peripheral nerves in man. J Physiol 102: 191–215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Sunderland S (1990) The anatomy and physiology of nerve injury. Muscle Nerve 13: 771–784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Pfister BJ, Gordon T, Loverde JR, Kochar AS, Mackinnon SE, et al. (2011) Biomedical engineering strategies for peripheral nerve repair: surgical applications, state of the art, and future challenges. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 39: 81–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Dubovy P (2004) Schwann cells and endoneurial extracellular matrix molecules as potential cues for sorting of regenerated axons: a review. Anat Sci Int 79: 198–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Dezawa M, Ishikawa H, Hoshino M, Itokazu Y, Nabeshima Y (2005) Potential of bone marrow stromal cells in applications for neuro-degenerative, neuro-traumatic and muscle degenerative diseases. Curr Neuropharmacol 3: 257–266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Radtke C, Wewetzer K, Reimers K, Vogt PM (2011) Transplantation of olfactory ensheathing cells as adjunct cell therapy for peripheral nerve injury. Cell Transplant 20: 145–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Kingham PJ, Kalbermatten DF, Mahay D, Armstrong SJ, Wiberg M, et al. (2007) Adipose-derived stem cells differentiate into a Schwann cell phenotype and promote neurite outgrowth in vitro. Exp Neurol 207: 267–274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Weerasuriya A, Mizisin AP (2011) The blood-nerve barrier: structure and functional significance. Methods Mol Biol 686: 149–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Tamaki T, Akatsuka A, Ando K, Nakamura Y, Matsuzawa H, et al. (2002) Identification of myogenic-endothelial progenitor cells in the interstitial spaces of skeletal muscle. J Cell Biol 157: 571–577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Tamaki T, Akatsuka A, Okada Y, Matsuzaki Y, Okano H, et al. (2003) Growth and differentiation potential of main- and side-population cells derived from murine skeletal muscle. Exp Cell Res 291: 83–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Tamaki T, Uchiyama Y, Okada Y, Ishikawa T, Sato M, et al. (2005) Functional recovery of damaged skeletal muscle through synchronized vasculogenesis, myogenesis, and neurogenesis by muscle-derived stem cells. Circulation 112: 2857–2866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Tamaki T, Okada Y, Uchiyama Y, Tono K, Masuda M, et al. (2007) Synchronized reconstitution of muscle fibers, peripheral nerves and blood vessels by murine skeletal muscle-derived CD34(-)/45 (-) cells. Histochem Cell Biol 128: 349–360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Tamaki T, Okada Y, Uchiyama Y, Tono K, Masuda M, et al. (2007) Clonal multipotency of skeletal muscle-derived stem cells between mesodermal and ectodermal lineage. Stem Cells 25: 2283–2290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Tamaki T, Okada Y, Uchiyama Y, Tono K, Masuda M, et al. (2008) Skeletal muscle-derived CD34+/45- and CD34−/45- stem cells are situated hierarchically upstream of Pax7+ cells. Stem Cells Dev 17: 653–667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Tamaki T, Uchiyama Y, Akatsuka A (2010) Plasticity and physiological role of stem cells derived from skeletal muscle interstitium: contribution to muscle fiber hyperplasia and therapeutic use. Curr Pharm Des 16: 956–967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Dezawa M, Takahashi I, Esaki M, Takano M, Sawada H (2001) Sciatic nerve regeneration in rats induced by transplantation of in vitro differentiated bone-marrow stromal cells. Eur J Neurosci 14: 1771–1776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Dezawa M (2002) Central and peripheral nerve regeneration by transplantation of Schwann cells and transdifferentiated bone marrow stromal cells. Anat Sci Int 77: 12–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Billings SD, Walsh SV, Fisher C, Nusrat A, Weiss SW, et al. (2004) Aberrant expression of tight junction-related proteins ZO-1, claudin-1 and occludin in synovial sarcoma: an immunohistochemical study with ultrastructural correlation. Mod Pathol 17: 141–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Pummi KP, Aho HJ, Laato MK, Peltonen JT, Peltonen SA (2006) Tight junction proteins and perineurial cells in neurofibromas. J Histochem Cytochem 54: 53–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Popovic M, Bresjanac M, Sketelj J (1994) Regenerating axons enhance differentiation of perineurial-like cells involved in minifascicle formation in the injured peripheral nerve. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 53: 590–597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Schroder JM, May R, Weis J (1993) Perineurial cells are the first to traverse gaps of peripheral nerves in silicone tubes. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 95 Suppl: S78–83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Popovic M, Bresjanac M, Sketelj J (2000) Role of axon-deprived Schwann cells in perineurial regeneration in the rat sciatic nerve. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 26: 221–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Scaravilli F (1984) Regeneration of the perineurium across a surgically induced gap in a nerve encased in a plastic tube. J Anat 139 (Pt 3): 411–424. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Thomas PK, Jones DG (1967) The cellular response to nerve injury. II. Regeneration of the perineurium after nerve section. J Anat 101: 45–55. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Weis J, May R, Schroder JM (1994) Fine structural and immunohistochemical identification of perineurial cells connecting proximal and distal stumps of transected peripheral nerves at early stages of regeneration in silicone tubes. Acta Neuropathol 88: 159–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Uemura T, Takamatsu K, Ikeda M, Okada M, Kazuki K, et al. (2012) Transplantation of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurospheres for peripheral nerve repair. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 419: 130–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Tosaki T, Kamiya H, Yasuda Y, Naruse K, Kato K, et al. (2008) Reduced NGF secretion by Schwann cells under the high glucose condition decreases neurite outgrowth of DRG neurons. Exp Neurol 213: 381–387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Zhang JY, Luo XG, Xian CJ, Liu ZH, Zhou XF (2000) Endogenous BDNF is required for myelination and regeneration of injured sciatic nerve in rodents. Eur J Neurosci 12: 4171–4180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Gordon T (2010) The physiology of neural injury and regeneration: The role of neurotrophic factors. J Commun Disord 43: 265–273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Horie H, Inagaki Y, Sohma Y, Nozawa R, Okawa K, et al. (1999) Galectin-1 regulates initial axonal growth in peripheral nerves after axotomy. J Neurosci 19: 9964–9974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Araki T, Milbrandt J (1996) Ninjurin, a novel adhesion molecule, is induced by nerve injury and promotes axonal growth. Neuron 17: 353–361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Dubovy P, Raska O, Klusakova I, Stejskal L, Celakovsky P, et al. (2011) Ciliary neurotrophic factor promotes motor reinnervation of the musculocutaneous nerve in an experimental model of end-to-side neurorrhaphy. BMC Neurosci 12: 58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Wang L, Lee HK, Seo IA, Shin YK, Lee KY, et al. (2009) Cell type-specific STAT3 activation by gp130-related cytokines in the peripheral nerves. Neuroreport 20: 663–668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Bremer M, Frob F, Kichko T, Reeh P, Tamm ER, et al. (2011) Sox10 is required for Schwann-cell homeostasis and myelin maintenance in the adult peripheral nerve. Glia 59: 1022–1032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Britsch S, Goerich DE, Riethmacher D, Peirano RI, Rossner M, et al. (2001) The transcription factor Sox10 is a key regulator of peripheral glial development. Genes Dev 15: 66–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Finzsch M, Schreiner S, Kichko T, Reeh P, Tamm ER, et al. (2010) Sox10 is required for Schwann cell identity and progression beyond the immature Schwann cell stage. J Cell Biol 189: 701–712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Ferrara N (2004) Vascular endothelial growth factor: basic science and clinical progress. Endocr Rev 25: 581–611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Schroder K, Schutz S, Schloffel I, Batz S, Takac I, et al. (2011) Hepatocyte growth factor induces a proangiogenic phenotype and mobilizes endothelial progenitor cells by activating Nox2. Antioxid Redox Signal 15: 915–923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Campbell WW (2008) Evaluation and management of peripheral nerve injury. Clin Neurophysiol 119: 1951–1965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Li L, Mignone J, Yang M, Matic M, Penman S, et al. (2003) Nestin expression in hair follicle sheath progenitor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 9958–9961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Amoh Y, Li L, Campillo R, Kawahara K, Katsuoka K, et al. (2005) Implanted hair follicle stem cells form Schwann cells that support repair of severed peripheral nerves. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 17734–17738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Amoh Y, Kanoh M, Niiyama S, Hamada Y, Kawahara K, et al. (2009) Human hair follicle pluripotent stem (hfPS) cells promote regeneration of peripheral-nerve injury: an advantageous alternative to ES and iPS cells. J Cell Biochem 107: 1016–1020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Okabe M, Ikawa M, Kominami K, Nakanishi T, Nishimune Y (1997) ‘Green mice’ as a source of ubiquitous green cells. FEBS Lett 407: 313–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.