Abstract
Purpose
Radiotherapy (RT) is an integral component in the management of many abdominal and pelvic malignancies. Imaging follow-up in patients who have received RT is performed to assess for treatment response, evaluate for tumour recurrence and to diagnose complications related to treatment. The purpose of this pictorial review is to depict the expected imaging findings and potential complications following RT in the genitourinary (GU) tract using an organ-based approach and to review the diagnosis of locally recurrent tumour in the GU tract following RT.
Conclusions
Some GU malignancies, namely cervical and prostatic carcinoma, can be treated with radical RT with intent to cure. More frequently, the GU tract is indirectly treated as a result of RT to adjacent cancers. Expected imaging findings, RT-related complications and the diagnosis of recurrent tumour following RT in the GU tract often necessitate a multi-modality imaging approach, the incorporation of functional imaging techniques and an organ-based approach for diagnosis.
Keywords: Genitourinary tract, Imaging, Radiotherapy, Tumour
Introduction
Radiotherapy (RT) is commonly used for the treatment of various malignancies in the abdomen and pelvis. RT can be delivered using external (three-dimensional [3D] conformal, intensity modulated, stereotactic radiosurgery, proton therapy) or internal (brachytherapy) delivery systems which target the primary tumour/organ, attempting to minimise damage to adjacent structures. The genitourinary (GU) system is often involved when RT is administered in the abdomen and pelvis. GU involvement can be direct (if treatment is given for a primary GU malignancy) or indirect (when the primary target is in close proximity to adjacent organs of the GU tract). In the upper abdomen, RT is not the primary radical treatment option for the management of renal, adrenal or upper tract urothelial tumours [1–3]. These organs are commonly involved indirectly when RT is used to treat adjacent tumours in the spine, liver and pancreas for example. In the pelvis, the cervix and vulva in woman and the prostate gland in men, are frequently treated with radical RT [4, 5]. These organs, in addition to the urinary bladder, uterus and ovaries, are also involved indirectly during the treatment of other pelvic malignancies such as rectal cancer.
In the last decade there have there have been significant improvements in RT treatment and delivery techniques that should help to minimise the risk of early and late RT toxicity. Improvements in imaging allow radiation oncologists to better define tumour tissue versus organs at risk. Modern RT techniques including intensity modulated (IM) RT and proton beam RT help minimise doses to critical normal tissues. In addition, modern linear accelerators have cone-beam technology for daily image guided treatment delivery (image-guided [IG] RT). IGRT allows oncologists to use tight RT treatment margins around tumours helping minimise the risk of collateral normal tissue damage. Early recognition of RT toxicity is important for effective conservative and surgical management strategies. It is critical to distinguish radiation toxicity from recurrence as the treatment strategy and prognosis is quite different.
The purpose of this review is to depict the expected imaging findings following RT to the GU tract, using an organ-based approach. The importance of imaging for the diagnosis of RT-induced complications and recurrent tumour is also reviewed, emphasising the role of multi-modality imaging for diagnosis.
Kidneys
In adults, RT is rarely given for the radical treatment of renal tumours, but may be given in the setting of salvage therapy or palliation [1]. In paediatric patients, RT is commonly used for the treatment of Wilms’ tumour [6, 7]. When RT is administered to the upper abdomen for other cancers, portions of the kidneys frequently also receive radiation dose. Radiation-induced renal injury (radiation nephropathy) was first recognised in 1906, although it only became well understood after a case series of men treated with RT for seminoma was reported in 1952 [8]. The kidney is a radiosensitive organ with a whole organ tolerance dose (5 % complication rate in 5 years) of 20 Gy [8]. The accepted threshold dose of irradiation that will cause radiation nephropathy is a total dose of 28 Gy, fractionated in 5 weeks or less [8]. Clinically, patients present with azotaemia, hypertension and anaemia, which can progress to renal failure[8]. In order to minimise the risk of radiation nephritis, advanced RT planning techniques, such as IMRT, can be used to decrease the volume of kidney receiving significant radiation dose.
The imaging findings of radiation nephropathy are well described. The kidneys may appear normal in acute radiation nephropathy [9]. In the acute setting, the kidneys may show decreased or absent function, resulting in a delayed or persistent nephrogram [10]. The imaging findings of radiation nephropathy have not, to our knowledge, been described using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Decreased T1 and increased T2 signal intensity in that portion of the affected kidney is commonly observed. These areas may also demonstrate restricted diffusion, which is of uncertain aetiology but may be on basis of cell death and cytotoxic oedema (Fig. 1). In the chronic setting, radiation nephropathy results in atrophy and scarring of the renal cortex with a smooth contour (Fig. 2) [10]; imaging findings indicative of irreversible damage. The proportion of patients with imaging findings of acute radiation nephropathy that progress to irreversible renal damage is, to our knowledge, unknown.
Adrenal glands
RT is rarely given for the salvage or palliative treatment of adrenal tumours, with surgery (for primary) and chemotherapy (for secondary) tumours representing the preferred treatment options [2]. RT can be given to treat or palliate high risk and aggressive neuroblastoma in children [11]. We previously reported the first case of acute adrenal injury following external beam RT of the spine [12], in which the patient developed adrenal insufficiency during the course of disease. The adrenal glands are reported to be radio-resistant, thought to be protected by the adrenal medulla and by their proximity to adjacent organs [13]. RT-induced adrenal injury may result in bilateral, symmetric, diffuse low-density thickening of the adrenal glands on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) with co-existing imaging findings of radiation nephropathy (Fig. 3) [12]. The imaging findings of chronic radiation-induced adrenal injury are not known.
Ureters
RT is rarely given for upper tract urothelial tumours, but can be used in adjuvant or salvage therapy [3]. The ureters are relatively radio-resistant [9]. Ureteral strictures are uncommon complications of RT, occurring most commonly in patients treated for pelvic malignancy with reported frequencies between 1 and 3 % [9; 10]. Strictures can be focal but are usually long with characteristically smooth and tapered margins (Figs. 4 and 5) [9]. The most common location of radiation-induced ureteric stricture is at or just above the uretero-vesicular junction [14]. Strictures can occur acutely (within 6 months of RT) but are more commonly seen in the chronic setting with latency periods reported up to 10 years after treatment [9, 14]. In contrast to radiation-induced strictures, malignant strictures are irregular and tend to have abrupt and shouldered margins with an associated mass [14]. Other manifestations of ureteric injury following RT are rare and include fistula formation and reflux due to incompetence of the intramural portion of the ureter related to bladder fibrosis [15].
Urinary bladder and urethra
The definitive treatment option for urinary bladder tumours is surgery. A recent review concluded that RT for superficial tumours and in the routine pre/post-operative setting is not indicated [16]. Combined RT and chemotherapy is an option for selected cases of bladder cancer in patients opting for bladder preservation. RT alone should only be considered for palliation or in non-operative patients who cannot also receive chemotherapy [16].
Radiation-induced bladder injury is often related to RT of other pelvic malignancies. The bladder is the most radiosensitive organ in the urinary tract [9]with the incidence of radiation cystitis ranging from 3 % to 12 %, depending on total dose and volume of bladder treated [15]. Doses of 30 Gy over 3–4 weeks can result in mild injury with doses of 60–70 Gy, resulting in more severe injury and possible long-term complications [9]. Radiation cystitis is often separated into an acute phase (<3–6 months), where pathologically there is oedema and hyperaemia of the mucosa and submucosa with lymphocytic infiltration and a chronic phase (>6 months) where there is fibrosis, mucosal atrophy, radiation telangiectasia and rarely fistula formation [9].
Fluoroscopic images demonstrate reduced capacity, elevation of the bladder from the pelvic floor, variable degrees of wall thickening and a characteristic rounded appearance (Fig. 6) [9, 10]. Calcifications of the bladder wall may be seen [9]. CT shows similar findings with bladder wall thickening and decreased size [9]. Peri-vesical stranding (in the acute setting) and increased fatty deposition (in the chronic setting) may be seen. With haemorrhagic cystitis, high density can be seen in the bladder lumen [9]. Imaging findings with MRI are similar, although early changes of RT-induced cystitis are better depicted with T2-weighted sequences, which demonstrate variable degrees of increased signal in the bladder wall depending on the severity of the injury [9, 14]. Mild cystitis affects primarily the mucosa and submucosa, and severe toxicity results in transmural involvement (Fig. 7) [9]. MRI can demonstrate preferential involvement of the posterior bladder wall and trigone, with later involvement of the entire bladder [14]. Increased mucosal enhancement may be observed with contrast-enhanced CT or MRI [14]. A severe complication of radiation cystitis is development of fistula to the bowel or reproductive organs, which is discussed later. Differentiation of residual or recurrent tumour from post-RT changes in the bladder is difficult and imaging findings, to our knowledge, have not been described. If there is clinical concern in this setting, cystoscopy is likely indicated for tissue sampling.
Radiation-induced urethral injury is typically related to brachytherapy treatment of prostatic carcinoma [17]. Brachytherapy complications include urethral strictures and, rarely, urorectal fistulas [17]. Urethral strictures can develop in up to 5 % of patients treated with brachytherapy and are dependent on dose. Urethral strictures involve the posterior membranous urethra and are treated with dilation/incision [17]. Urorectal fistulas (Fig. 8) are rare serious complications. Fistulas are managed initially with urinary diversion and later in some patients primary repair can be attempted [18].
Uterus, cervix, ovaries and vulva
RT for gynaecological malignancies varies by site and stage; however, it is most commonly used for the management of locally advanced cervical [4] and vulvar [5] cancers and less commonly used in the treatment of other uterine and ovarian malignancies [4, 5, 19].
Post-RT findings in the female reproductive organs and pelvis are non-specific. In the early post-RT setting, increased T2 signal intensity with MRI may be seen in the cervix and vagina due to inflammatory cervicitis and vaginitis (Fig. 7). These findings can occur in conjunction with other findings of acute radiation injury in other pelvic organs such as the urinary bladder and bowel (Fig. 7). Other non-specific findings seen after acute pelvic RT include inflammatory stranding, oedema and free fluid in the pelvis. In the chronic setting, the uterus, cervix and ovaries atrophy. Low signal intensity within these organs on T2-weighted sequences is commonly observed (Figs. 9, 10 and 11) [20]. Thickening (without nodularity) and low T2 signal of the uterosacral ligaments and pelvic sidewall are also common [20]. In younger patients the ovaries may be intentionally transposed out of the pelvis prior to RT to preserve fertility. The normal ovaries in this instance should not be mistaken for lymphadenopathy or peritoneal implants.
Of the gynaecological malignancies, cervical carcinoma is most commonly treated with RT. Patients with Stage IB or IIA tumour may be treated with surgery or RT [20], while patients with advanced disease (Stages IB, III and IVA) are usually treated with RT combined with chemotherapy [4]. Optimal cure rates are achieved by combined external beam and intracavitary RT [21]. Brachytherapy devices vary in shape and configuration, but the applicator and the intracavitary component should always be positioned at the level of the tumour within the cervix (Figs. 9 and 10) [21]. Probe tip, if present, should pass through the cervix into the endometrial cavity (Fig. 9) [21]. Interstitial brachytherapy needles are used in conjunction with the intracavitary device in selected cases of cervical cancer [21]. Intracavitary brachytherapy devices are MRI compatible and are best evaluated on fast/turbo spin echo sequences which minimise susceptibility artefacts that can render the use of gradient echo sequences prohibitive. Complications from brachytherapy placement are common (up to 8 %) and are mostly related to perforation (usually at the uterine fundus and posterior vaginal fornix) [21]. Direct trauma to adjacent bowel from perforation is uncommon but increased local dose can lead to long term fistula and stricture formation [21].
Patients undergoing RT for the treatment of cervical cancer are not commonly imaged in the early post-RT setting [20]; however, a widened endocervical canal and non-specific increased T2 signal in the cervical stroma and vagina may be observed [20]. An early (<3 months) decrease in signal intensity and tumour volume indicates a favourable response to treatment [4]. Recently, using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), an increase in the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of the tumour has been described with RT response [22]. Later, there is an expected linear decrease in uterus and cervical volume as well as T2 signal intensity (Figs. 9, 10 and 11) [4]. Areas of parametrial invasion will be replaced by low T2 signal intensity fibrosis (Fig. 9) [4]. Reconstitution of the normal cervical zonal anatomy with homogeneous low signal intensity of the cervical stroma is a reliable indicator of complete response and absence of tumour in the post-irradiation cervix (Figs. 9 and 11) [4]. Positron emission tomography (PET)-CT has been described as early as 2–4 weeks after chemo-RT for the assessment of treatment response, but is typically performed after at least 3 months following the initiation of therapy [23].
Cervical stenosis following RT is common (Fig. 10) [20]. It is important to differentiate benign hydrometra due to RT-induced cervical stenosis from locally recurrent tumour, which can also cause obstruction at the cervical os (Fig. 12). Absence of an obstructing mass and lack of intermediate T2 signal intensity are reliable differentiating features. Functional imaging techniques such as DWI and dynamic contrast enhancement (discussed later) may also increase diagnostic accuracy in this setting. Other complications associated with RT of cervical carcinoma (and pelvic RT in general) include ureteral stenosis, radiation enteritis/colitis and development of fistulous disease to the urinary bladder and bowel [4, 20]. Fistulous disease can occur decades after pelvic RT and often necessitates a multi-modality approach for diagnosis (Figs. 6, 13 and 14) [20]. RT-induced fistula can be difficult to differentiate from malignant fistulous disease caused by locally recurrent tumour and tissue sampling is often required for accurate diagnosis [4, 24, 25].
Patients treated with RT for cervical cancer are often followed clinically and with imaging to detect recurrences. Recurrent cervical cancer is defined as local tumour re-growth or the development of distant metastases at least 6 months after the lesion has regressed [4, 25]. Most relapses occur in the first 2 years after treatment [24]. Thirty percent of patients treated with radical RT will die from recurrent disease [4, 26]. Risk factors for recurrence include histological features, depth of invasion and nodal status [4, 26]. The most frequent sites of recurrence in the pelvis are in the central (cervix, uterus, vagina, parametria, ovaries, bladder or rectum) or lateral (pelvic side wall) compartments [4, 24–27]. After RT, 70 % of recurrences occur in the treated cervix [28]. Recurrences can also occur systemically in lymph nodes or visceral organs and bone. Imaging diagnosis of locally recurrent tumour varies by institution but is primarily performed with MRI and PET-CT [24]. Whole-body DWI is an emerging diagnostic tool which could be applied for the detection of systemic or locally recurrent tumour in cervical carcinoma [29]. The sensitivity of detecting pelvic recurrence is 90 % in both MRI and PET-CT with superior depiction of extra pelvic disease using PET-CT [28, 30]. Central compartment recurrence may be recognised on CT as soft tissue masses with variable necrosis or cystic change [4, 26, 27]. Evaluation of locally recurrent tumour is better with MRI when compared with CT [4, 24, 27]. Recurrent tumour demonstrates intermediate T2 signal intensity with MRI (Figs. 12 and 15) [4, 20, 27]. Interval change over serial examinations with development of intermediate T2 signal is the most reliable finding of locally recurrent tumour [28]. Within 6 months of therapy increased T2 signal intensity in the cervix can be seen from RT induced inflammation (Figs. 7 and 10) [4, 24]. Recurrent tumour enhances heterogeneously with variable degrees of necrosis (Fig. 12) [4, 20, 26, 27]. PET-CT reveals a heterogeneous mass in the central or lateral compartments with increased FDG uptake (Figs. 12 and 15) [28, 30].
Distinguishing between post-RT fibrosis and locally recurrent tumour can be challenging (Fig. 15) [4]. Dynamic-contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI and DWI are functional sequences that improve specificity [20, 24, 28, 31]. Recurrent tumour enhances earlier and to a greater extent than fibrosis [28, 32]. Recurrent tumour may demonstrate restricted diffusion, whereas radiation fibrosis often does not [28]. PET-CT is typically also performed in this setting, showing uptake in areas of recurrent tumour [30].
Prostate, seminal vesicles and testicles
RT has no role in the primary treatment of non-seminomatous testicular tumours. Adjuvant retroperitoneal RT in seminoma is associated with increased risk of late second malignancies. Because of this risk, Stage I seminoma patients are offered active surveillance and radical RT is reserved for Stage 2 disease and for patients who relapse on surveillance [33]. Testicular atrophy may be seen following pelvic RT.
The treatment of prostate carcinoma varies depending on patient age, health status, clinical stage, prostate serum antigen (PSA) level and Gleason score at biopsy. Many patients are treated with RT. Internal RT (brachytherapy) is typically used in patients with low-risk prostate cancer and requires the transperineal insertion of radioactive seeds into the prostate gland. Post-procedural imaging will depict the seeds as radiodensities using radiography/CT and as areas of susceptibility artefact with MRI. Seed migration is common, occurring in up to 25 % of patients with migration sites such as the lungs, pelvis and mediastinum most often involved [34, 35]. Movement of seeds may result in inadequate dosimetry and possible morbidity in distant organs. Less common sites of migration include the liver, inguinal region and heart (Fig. 16) [34, 35]. Image-guided external RT techniques require the placement of fiducial markers (gold or platinum seeds) or other guidance systems in the prostate gland.
Morphological changes in the prostate and seminal vesicles are observed after both external RT and brachytherapy. The prostate gland and seminal vesicle atrophy and diffuse low signal intensity on T2-weighted sequences is observed (Figs. 17 and 18) [36]. Loss of the normal zonal anatomy due to chronic inflammation, glandular atrophy and fibrosis is common [36]. The normal peripheral zone glandular tissue actively secretes citrate and sparingly uses choline for cell membrane synthesis, resulting in high citrate and low choline levels [36]. In the irradiated peripheral zone, glandular tissue metabolism converts to citrate oxidising and utilises more choline for cell membrane synthesis. An increased choline + creatinine/citrate ratio is therefore observed in the normal irradiated prostate using MR spectroscopy [36]. The normal peripheral zone is composed of large amounts of glandular tissue with free diffusion of water molecules resulting in high apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values using DWI [36]. In the irradiated peripheral zone, ADC values decrease due to destroyed glandular function and reduced secretions in the acute setting and fibrosis in the chronic setting [37]. Treatment changes are also depicted within the primary tumour when imaged with serial MRI examinations with an expected decrease in T2 and an increase in ADC values [38]. Complications of pelvic RT for the treatment of prostate cancer are similar to pelvic RT complications in general and discussed earlier, but include mainly radiation cystitis, urethral or urinary bladder fistula formation and radiation proctitis.
The diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer is based mainly on PSA kinetics [36]. Biochemical relapse or failure after RT is defined according to the Houston criterion, which is a nadir PSA level + 2 ng/ml within 5 years of completing therapy [36, 37]. Biochemical relapse can be on the basis of local recurrence or metastatic disease. Systemic recurrences are typically to lymph nodes and bone, and diagnosis can be achieved with CT and bone scan [39]. Whole-body DWI has also been described for the diagnosis of systemic disease in prostatic carcinoma [29]. 18F-Fluorocholine PET-CT or PET-MR is a variably available imaging modality that can also be used in the setting of biochemical relapse, mostly for the detection of systemic disease if salvage therapy for local recurrences is contemplated [40]. Approximately 30 % of patients treated with RT will suffer biochemical failure and this will typically occur at the site of the primary tumour [37, 41]. Intermediate T2 signal intensity at the site of the prior tumour may represent local recurrence. T2-weighted imaging alone lacks specificity and is insufficient to reliably diagnose local recurrence [36, 37, 41–43]. Multi-parametric MRI (two or more functional imaging tests) is better than T2-weighted imaging alone for the diagnosis of local recurrence [36, 37, 41–43]. Comparison of the three functional imaging tests (DWI, DCE and MR spectroscopy ) in the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer is beyond the scope of this manuscript, but has been described in detail elsewhere. Locally recurrent tumour shows more restricted diffusion (lower ADC values) with DWI, earlier onset and greater magnitude of enhancement with rapid washout of contrast material as well as larger quantitative perfusion (Ktrans, Kep and ve) parameters with DCE and higher choline + citrate/creatinine ratios using MR spectroscopy when compared with the normal post-irradiated peripheral zone (Figs. 17 and 18) [36, 37, 41–43].
Conclusion
In conclusion, imaging changes following RT treatment in the GU tract are common and should be recognised in the post-RT setting. RT related complications in the GU tract are variant and often necessitate a multi-modality approach for diagnosis. The diagnosis of locally recurrent tumour after RT is complex and often requires the application of advanced functional imaging techniques for diagnosis.
Acknowledgments
None.
Contributor Information
Nicola Schieda, Phone: 1-613-7590958, FAX: 1-613-7378830, Email: nschieda@toh.on.ca.
Shawn Christopher Malone, Phone: 1-613-7377700, FAX: 1-613-7378830, Email: smalone@ottawahospital.on.ca.
Omran Al Dandan, Phone: 1-613-7985555, FAX: 1-613-7378830, Email: oaldandan@toh.on.ca.
Parvati Ramchandani, Phone: 1-215-6623278, FAX: 1-613-6627011, Email: ramchand@rad.upenn.edu.
Evan S. Siegelman, Phone: 1-215-6623034, FAX: 1-215-6623013, Email: evan.siegelman@uphs.upenn.edu
References
- 1.Siva S, Pham D, Gill S, Corcoran NM, Foroudi F. A systematic review of stereotactic radiotherapy ablation for primary renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int. 2012;110:E737–E743. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11550.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Almaghrabi MY, Supiot S, Paris F, Mahe MA, Rio E. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for abdominal oligometastases: a biological and clinical review. Radiat Oncol. 2012;7:126. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Latchamsetty KC, Porter CR. Treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a review of surgical and adjuvant therapy. Rev Urol. 2006;8:61–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jeong YY, Kang HK, Chung TW, Seo JJ, Park JG. Uterine cervical carcinoma after therapy: CT and MR imaging findings. Radiographics. 2003;23:969–981. doi: 10.1148/rg.234035001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.de Hullu JA, van der Zee AG. Surgery and radiotherapy in vulvar cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2006;60:38–58. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2006.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Paulino AC. Relapsed Wilms tumor: is there a role for radiation therapy? Am J Clin Oncol. 2001;24:408–413. doi: 10.1097/00000421-200108000-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Paulino AC, Wen BC, Brown CK, et al. Late effects in children treated with radiation therapy for Wilms’ tumor. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;46:1239–1246. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00534-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cohen EP, Robbins ME. Radiation nephropathy. Semin Nephrol. 2003;23:486–499. doi: 10.1016/S0270-9295(03)00093-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Capps GW, Fulcher AS, Szucs RA, Turner MA. Imaging features of radiation-induced changes in the abdomen. Radiographics. 1997;17:1455–1473. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.17.6.9397458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Libshitz HI, DuBrow RA, Loyer EM, Charnsangavej C. Radiation change in normal organs: an overview of body imaging. Eur Radiol. 1996;6:786–795. doi: 10.1007/BF00240672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.McHugh K. Renal and adrenal tumours in children. Cancer Imaging. 2007;7:41–51. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2007.0007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schieda N RP, Siegelman ES (2013) Computed tomographic findings of radiation induced acute adrenal injury with associated radiation nephropathy: a case report. Acta Radiol Short Rep (in press) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 13.Fajardo LF, Berthrong M. Radiation injury in surgical pathology. Part I. Am J Surg Pathol. 1978;2:159–199. doi: 10.1097/00000478-197806000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ganeshan DM, Salem U, Viswanathan C, et al. Complications of oncologic therapy in the abdomen and pelvis: a review. Abdom Imaging. 2013;38:1–21. doi: 10.1007/s00261-012-9899-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Johnson RJ, Carrington BM. Pelvic radiation disease. Clin Radiol. 1992;45:4–12. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9260(05)81458-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Marta GN, Hanna SA, Gadia R, Correa SF, Silva JL, de Andrade CH. The role of radiotherapy in urinary bladder cancer: current status. Int Braz J Urol. 2012;38:144–153. doi: 10.1590/S1677-55382012000200002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Merrick GS, Butler WM, Tollenaar BG, Galbreath RW, Lief JH. The dosimetry of prostate brachytherapy-induced urethral strictures. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;52:461–468. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01811-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lane BR, Stein DE, Remzi FH, Strong SA, Fazio VW, Angermeier KW. Management of radiotherapy induced rectourethral fistula. J Urol. 2006;175:1382–1387. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00687-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fujiwara K, Suzuki S, Yoden E, Ishikawa H, Imajo Y, Kohno I. Local radiation therapy for localized relapsed or refractory ovarian cancer patients with or without symptoms after chemotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2002;12:250–256. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.2002.01096.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Engin G. Cervical cancer: MR imaging findings before, during, and after radiation therapy. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:313–324. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-2804-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Beddy P, Rangarajan RD, Sala E. Role of MRI in intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: what the radiologist needs to know. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:W341–W347. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kim HS, Kim CK, Park BK, Huh SJ, Kim B. Evaluation of therapeutic response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer using diffusion-weighted MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;37:187–193. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kidd EA, Thomas M, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Grigsby PW. Changes in cervical cancer FDG uptake during chemoradiation and association with response. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;85:116–122. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.02.056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liyanage SH, Roberts CA, Rockall AG. MRI and PET scans for primary staging and detection of cervical cancer recurrence. Womens Health (Lond Engl) 2010;6:251–267. doi: 10.2217/whe.10.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Babar S, Rockall A, Goode A, Shepherd J, Reznek R. Magnetic resonance imaging appearances of recurrent cervical carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007;17:637–645. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00849.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fulcher AS, O’Sullivan SG, Segreti EM, Kavanagh BD. Recurrent cervical carcinoma: typical and atypical manifestations. Radiographics. 1999;19(Spec No):S103–S116. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.19.suppl_1.g99oc19s103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Choi JI, Kim SH, Seong CK, Sim JS, Lee HJ, Do KH. Recurrent uterine cervical carcinoma: spectrum of imaging findings. Korean J Radiol. 2000;1:198–207. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2000.1.4.198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sala E, Rockall A, Rangarajan D, Kubik-Huch RA. The role of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the female pelvis. Eur J Radiol. 2010;76:367–385. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Padhani AR, Koh DM, Collins DJ. Whole-body diffusion-weighted MR imaging in cancer: current status and research directions. Radiology. 2011;261:700–718. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Son H, Kositwattanarerk A, Hayes MP, et al. PET/CT evaluation of cervical cancer: spectrum of disease. Radiographics. 2010;30:1251–1268. doi: 10.1148/rg.305105703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sahdev A. Cervical tumors. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2010;31:399–413. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2010.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hawighorst H, Knapstein PG, Schaeffer U, et al. Pelvic lesions in patients with treated cervical carcinoma: efficacy of pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic MR images in distinguishing recurrent tumors from benign conditions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:401–408. doi: 10.2214/ajr.166.2.8553955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shin YS, Kim HJ. Current management of testicular cancer. Korean J Urol. 2013;54:2–10. doi: 10.4111/kju.2013.54.1.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Miyazawa K, Matoba M, Minato H, et al. Seed migration after transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy with I-125 free seeds: analysis of its incidence and risk factors. Jpn J Radiol. 2012;30:635–641. doi: 10.1007/s11604-012-0102-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sugawara A, Nakashima J, Kunieda E, et al. Incidence of seed migration to the chest, abdomen, and pelvis after transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy with loose (125)I seeds. Radiat Oncol. 2011;6:130. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-6-130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.De Visschere PJ, De Meerleer GO, Futterer JJ, Villeirs GM. Role of MRI in follow-up after focal therapy for prostate carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:1427–1433. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Morgan VA, Riches SF, Giles S, Dearnaley D, deSouza NM. Diffusion-weighted MRI for locally recurrent prostate cancer after external beam radiotherapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:596–602. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Foltz WD, Wu A, Chung P, et al. Changes in apparent diffusion coefficient and T2 relaxation during radiotherapy for prostate cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;37:909–916. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Verma S, Rajesh A. A clinically relevant approach to imaging prostate cancer: review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:S1–S10. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.7196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cimitan M, Bortolus R, Morassut S, et al. [18F]fluorocholine PET/CT imaging for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer at PSA relapse: experience in 100 consecutive patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:1387–1398. doi: 10.1007/s00259-006-0150-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Arrayeh E, Westphalen AC, Kurhanewicz J, et al. Does local recurrence of prostate cancer after radiation therapy occur at the site of primary tumor? Results of a longitudinal MRI and MRSI study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82:e787–e793. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.11.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Akin O, Gultekin DH, Vargas HA, et al. Incremental value of diffusion weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in the detection of locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation treatment: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:1970–1978. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2130-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Daskivich TJ, Chamie K, Kwan L, et al. Improved prediction of long-term, other cause mortality in men with prostate cancer. J Urol. 2011;186:1868–1873. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]