Skip to main content

Some NLM-NCBI services and products are experiencing heavy traffic, which may affect performance and availability. We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience. For assistance, please contact our Help Desk at info@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1994 May 15;13(10):2378–2387. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06521.x

Operator-constitutive mutations in a DNA sequence recognized by a yeast homeodomain.

D L Smith 1, A D Johnson 1
PMCID: PMC395102  PMID: 7910796

Abstract

Homeodomain proteins regulate transcription in organisms as diverse as yeasts, mammals and plants, often effecting key decisions in development. Although homeodomains can selectively recognize certain DNA sequences, a question has arisen as to how specific this interaction is and how much it contributes to the ability of these proteins to properly select target genes in the cell. This question is particularly an issue in cases where the homeodomain proteins recognize DNA cooperatively with other DNA-binding proteins. In this paper, we examine the issue of DNA binding specificity for the homeodomain of the yeast alpha 2 protein (which recognizes the a-specific gene operator cooperatively with the MCM1 protein) by examining both in vivo and in vitro the effects of point mutations in its recognition sequence. We found that most changes in the homeodomain recognition sequence produced only small effects on both homeodomain affinity as measured in vitro (with and without the helper protein MCM1) and operator function as determined in vivo. This tolerance for operator mutations illustrates in a systematic way the modest DNA-binding specificity of the alpha 2 homeodomain and contrasts with the behavior of many of the bacterial and phage repressors where single point mutations in the operator can have dramatic effects on affinity. This tolerance for different sequences may arise from the fact that most of the interactions made between the alpha 2 homeodomain and the DNA occur through long amino acid side chains; we suggest that these side chains can reconfigure in order to create surfaces complementary to many different DNA sequences. The relaxed DNA-binding specificity of homeodomain proteins such as alpha 2 may be an important feature that permits new regulatory circuits to evolve rapidly from existing components.

Full text

PDF
2378

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Affolter M., Percival-Smith A., Müller M., Leupin W., Gehring W. J. DNA binding properties of the purified Antennapedia homeodomain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jun;87(11):4093–4097. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.11.4093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ammerer G. Identification, purification, and cloning of a polypeptide (PRTF/GRM) that binds to mating-specific promoter elements in yeast. Genes Dev. 1990 Feb;4(2):299–312. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.2.299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bender A., Sprague G. F., Jr Pheromones and pheromone receptors are the primary determinants of mating specificity in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 Mar;121(3):463–476. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.3.463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berg O. G., von Hippel P. H. Selection of DNA binding sites by regulatory proteins. II. The binding specificity of cyclic AMP receptor protein to recognition sites. J Mol Biol. 1988 Apr 20;200(4):709–723. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90482-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Betz J. L., Sasmor H. M., Buck F., Insley M. Y., Caruthers M. H. Base substitution mutants of the lac operator: in vivo and in vitro affinities for lac repressor. Gene. 1986;50(1-3):123–132. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(86)90317-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Billeter M., Qian Y., Otting G., Müller M., Gehring W. J., Wüthrich K. Determination of the three-dimensional structure of the Antennapedia homeodomain from Drosophila in solution by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Mol Biol. 1990 Jul 5;214(1):183–197. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90155-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Desplan C., Theis J., O'Farrell P. H. The sequence specificity of homeodomain-DNA interaction. Cell. 1988 Sep 23;54(7):1081–1090. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90123-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dolan J. W., Fields S. Cell-type-specific transcription in yeast. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991 Feb 16;1088(2):155–169. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(91)90051-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ebright R. H. Evidence for a contact between glutamine-18 of lac repressor and base pair 7 of lac operator. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Jan;83(2):303–307. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.2.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ekker S. C., Young K. E., von Kessler D. P., Beachy P. A. Optimal DNA sequence recognition by the Ultrabithorax homeodomain of Drosophila. EMBO J. 1991 May;10(5):1179–1186. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb08058.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Florence B., Handrow R., Laughon A. DNA-binding specificity of the fushi tarazu homeodomain. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Jul;11(7):3613–3623. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.7.3613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hanes S. D., Brent R. DNA specificity of the bicoid activator protein is determined by homeodomain recognition helix residue 9. Cell. 1989 Jun 30;57(7):1275–1283. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90063-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Herskowitz I. A regulatory hierarchy for cell specialization in yeast. Nature. 1989 Dec 14;342(6251):749–757. doi: 10.1038/342749a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jobe A., Sadler J. R., Bourgeois S. lac Repressor-operator interaction. IX. The binding of lac repressor to operators containing Oc mutations. J Mol Biol. 1974 May 15;85(2):231–248. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90362-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Johnson A. D., Herskowitz I. A repressor (MAT alpha 2 Product) and its operator control expression of a set of cell type specific genes in yeast. Cell. 1985 Aug;42(1):237–247. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80119-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Keleher C. A., Goutte C., Johnson A. D. The yeast cell-type-specific repressor alpha 2 acts cooperatively with a non-cell-type-specific protein. Cell. 1988 Jun 17;53(6):927–936. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(88)90449-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Keleher C. A., Passmore S., Johnson A. D. Yeast repressor alpha 2 binds to its operator cooperatively with yeast protein Mcm1. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Nov;9(11):5228–5230. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.11.5228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Keleher C. A., Redd M. J., Schultz J., Carlson M., Johnson A. D. Ssn6-Tup1 is a general repressor of transcription in yeast. Cell. 1992 Feb 21;68(4):709–719. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90146-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kissinger C. R., Liu B. S., Martin-Blanco E., Kornberg T. B., Pabo C. O. Crystal structure of an engrailed homeodomain-DNA complex at 2.8 A resolution: a framework for understanding homeodomain-DNA interactions. Cell. 1990 Nov 2;63(3):579–590. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90453-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lehming N., Sartorius J., Niemöller M., Genenger G., v Wilcken-Bergmann B., Müller-Hill B. The interaction of the recognition helix of lac repressor with lac operator. EMBO J. 1987 Oct;6(10):3145–3153. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02625.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Maniatis T., Ptashne M., Maurer R. Control elements in the DNA of bacteriophage lambda. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1974;38:857–868. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1974.038.01.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Miller A. M., MacKay V. L., Nasmyth K. A. Identification and comparison of two sequence elements that confer cell-type specific transcription in yeast. Nature. 1985 Apr 18;314(6012):598–603. doi: 10.1038/314598a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Otting G., Qian Y. Q., Billeter M., Müller M., Affolter M., Gehring W. J., Wüthrich K. Protein--DNA contacts in the structure of a homeodomain--DNA complex determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in solution. EMBO J. 1990 Oct;9(10):3085–3092. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07505.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pabo C. O., Sauer R. T. Transcription factors: structural families and principles of DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 1992;61:1053–1095. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.005201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Passmore S., Elble R., Tye B. K. A protein involved in minichromosome maintenance in yeast binds a transcriptional enhancer conserved in eukaryotes. Genes Dev. 1989 Jul;3(7):921–935. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.7.921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Phillips C. L., Vershon A. K., Johnson A. D., Dahlquist F. W. Secondary structure of the homeo domain of yeast alpha 2 repressor determined by NMR spectroscopy. Genes Dev. 1991 May;5(5):764–772. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.5.764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Qian Y. Q., Billeter M., Otting G., Müller M., Gehring W. J., Wüthrich K. The structure of the Antennapedia homeodomain determined by NMR spectroscopy in solution: comparison with prokaryotic repressors. Cell. 1989 Nov 3;59(3):573–580. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90040-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sauer R. T., Smith D. L., Johnson A. D. Flexibility of the yeast alpha 2 repressor enables it to occupy the ends of its operator, leaving the center free. Genes Dev. 1988 Jul;2(7):807–816. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.7.807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Schier A. F., Gehring W. J. Functional specificity of the homeodomain protein fushi tarazu: the role of DNA-binding specificity in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Feb 15;90(4):1450–1454. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.4.1450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Scott M. P., Tamkun J. W., Hartzell G. W., 3rd The structure and function of the homeodomain. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1989 Jul 28;989(1):25–48. doi: 10.1016/0304-419x(89)90033-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Siliciano P. G., Tatchell K. Transcription and regulatory signals at the mating type locus in yeast. Cell. 1984 Jul;37(3):969–978. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90431-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Smith D. L., Johnson A. D. A molecular mechanism for combinatorial control in yeast: MCM1 protein sets the spacing and orientation of the homeodomains of an alpha 2 dimer. Cell. 1992 Jan 10;68(1):133–142. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90212-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sprague G. F., Jr Combinatorial associations of regulatory proteins and the control of cell type in yeast. Adv Genet. 1990;27:33–62. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2660(08)60023-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Tan S., Richmond T. J. DNA binding-induced conformational change of the yeast transcriptional activator PRTF. Cell. 1990 Jul 27;62(2):367–377. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90373-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tatchell K., Nasmyth K. A., Hall B. D., Astell C., Smith M. In vitro mutation analysis of the mating-type locus in yeast. Cell. 1981 Nov;27(1 Pt 2):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90357-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Treisman J., Gönczy P., Vashishtha M., Harris E., Desplan C. A single amino acid can determine the DNA binding specificity of homeodomain proteins. Cell. 1989 Nov 3;59(3):553–562. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90038-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Vershon A. K., Johnson A. D. A short, disordered protein region mediates interactions between the homeodomain of the yeast alpha 2 protein and the MCM1 protein. Cell. 1993 Jan 15;72(1):105–112. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90054-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wolberger C., Vershon A. K., Liu B., Johnson A. D., Pabo C. O. Crystal structure of a MAT alpha 2 homeodomain-operator complex suggests a general model for homeodomain-DNA interactions. Cell. 1991 Nov 1;67(3):517–528. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90526-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES