Skip to main content
PMC home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1994 Jun 1;13(11):2708–2713. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06561.x

Yeast Kar3 is a minus-end microtubule motor protein that destabilizes microtubules preferentially at the minus ends.

S A Endow 1, S J Kang 1, L L Satterwhite 1, M D Rose 1, V P Skeen 1, E D Salmon 1
PMCID: PMC395145  PMID: 7912193

Abstract

Mutants of the yeast Kar3 protein are defective in nuclear fusion, or karyogamy, during mating and show slow mitotic growth, indicating a requirement for the protein both during mating and in mitosis. DNA sequence analysis predicts that Kar3 is a microtubule motor protein related to kinesin, but with the motor domain at the C-terminus of the protein rather than the N-terminus as in kinesin heavy chain. We have expressed Kar3 as a fusion protein with glutathione S-transferase (GST) and determined the in vitro motility properties of the bacterially expressed protein. The GST-Kar3 fusion protein bound to a coverslip translocates microtubules in gliding assays with a velocity of 1-2 microns/min and moves towards microtubule minus ends, unlike kinesin but like kinesin-related Drosophila ncd. Taxol-stabilized microtubules bound to GST-Kar3 on a coverslip shorten as they glide, resulting in faster lagging end, than leading end, velocities. Comparison of lagging and leading end velocities with velocities of asymmetrical axoneme-microtubule complexes indicates that microtubules shorten preferentially from the lagging or minus ends. The minus end-directed translocation and microtubule bundling of GST-Kar3 is consistent with models in which the Kar3 protein crosslinks internuclear microtubules and mediates nuclear fusion by moving towards microtubule minus ends, pulling the two nuclei together. In mitotic cells, the minus end motility of Kar3 could move chromosomes polewards, either by attaching to kinetochores and moving them polewards along microtubules, or by attaching to kinetochore microtubules and pulling them polewards along other polar microtubules.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Full text

PDF
2708

Images in this article

2709Image
on p.2709
2710Image
on p.2710
2710Image
on p.2710

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chandra R., Endow S. A. Expression of microtubule motor proteins in bacteria for characterization in in vitro motility assays. Methods Cell Biol. 1993;39:115–127. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60165-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chandra R., Salmon E. D., Erickson H. P., Lockhart A., Endow S. A. Structural and functional domains of the Drosophila ncd microtubule motor protein. J Biol Chem. 1993 Apr 25;268(12):9005–9013. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hackney D. D. Kinesin ATPase: rate-limiting ADP release. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Sep;85(17):6314–6318. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.17.6314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Huang J. C., Salt T. E., Voaden M. J., Marshall J. Non-competitive NMDA-receptor antagonists and anoxic degeneration of the ERG B-wave in vitro. Eye (Lond) 1991;5(Pt 4):476–480. doi: 10.1038/eye.1991.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hyman A. A., Middleton K., Centola M., Mitchison T. J., Carbon J. Microtubule-motor activity of a yeast centromere-binding protein complex. Nature. 1992 Oct 8;359(6395):533–536. doi: 10.1038/359533a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hyman A. A., Mitchison T. J. Two different microtubule-based motor activities with opposite polarities in kinetochores. Nature. 1991 May 16;351(6323):206–211. doi: 10.1038/351206a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hyman A., Drechsel D., Kellogg D., Salser S., Sawin K., Steffen P., Wordeman L., Mitchison T. Preparation of modified tubulins. Methods Enzymol. 1991;196:478–485. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)96041-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lockhart A., Cross R. A. Origins of reversed directionality in the ncd molecular motor. EMBO J. 1994 Feb 15;13(4):751–757. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06317.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McDonald H. B., Stewart R. J., Goldstein L. S. The kinesin-like ncd protein of Drosophila is a minus end-directed microtubule motor. Cell. 1990 Dec 21;63(6):1159–1165. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90412-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Meluh P. B., Rose M. D. KAR3, a kinesin-related gene required for yeast nuclear fusion. Cell. 1990 Mar 23;60(6):1029–1041. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90351-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mitchison T. J., Salmon E. D. Poleward kinetochore fiber movement occurs during both metaphase and anaphase-A in newt lung cell mitosis. J Cell Biol. 1992 Nov;119(3):569–582. doi: 10.1083/jcb.119.3.569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mitsui H., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K., Shinozaki K., Nishikawa K., Takahashi H. Identification of a gene family (kat) encoding kinesin-like proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana and the characterization of secondary structure of KatA. Mol Gen Genet. 1993 Apr;238(3):362–368. doi: 10.1007/BF00291995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. O'Connell M. J., Meluh P. B., Rose M. D., Morris N. R. Suppression of the bimC4 mitotic spindle defect by deletion of klpA, a gene encoding a KAR3-related kinesin-like protein in Aspergillus nidulans. J Cell Biol. 1993 Jan;120(1):153–162. doi: 10.1083/jcb.120.1.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Page B. D., Satterwhite L. L., Rose M. D., Snyder M. Localization of the Kar3 kinesin heavy chain-related protein requires the Cik1 interacting protein. J Cell Biol. 1994 Feb;124(4):507–519. doi: 10.1083/jcb.124.4.507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Polaina J., Conde J. Genes involved in the control of nuclear fusion during the sexual cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet. 1982;186(2):253–258. doi: 10.1007/BF00331858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Roof D. M., Meluh P. B., Rose M. D. Multiple kinesin-related proteins in yeast mitosis. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1991;56:693–703. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1991.056.01.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rose M. D. Nuclear fusion in yeast. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1991;45:539–567. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.45.100191.002543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sadhu A., Taylor E. W. A kinetic study of the kinesin ATPase. J Biol Chem. 1992 Jun 5;267(16):11352–11359. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Saunders W. S., Hoyt M. A. Kinesin-related proteins required for structural integrity of the mitotic spindle. Cell. 1992 Aug 7;70(3):451–458. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90169-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sawin K. E., Mitchison T. J., Wordeman L. G. Evidence for kinesin-related proteins in the mitotic apparatus using peptide antibodies. J Cell Sci. 1992 Feb;101(Pt 2):303–313. doi: 10.1242/jcs.101.2.303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Skibbens R. V., Skeen V. P., Salmon E. D. Directional instability of kinetochore motility during chromosome congression and segregation in mitotic newt lung cells: a push-pull mechanism. J Cell Biol. 1993 Aug;122(4):859–875. doi: 10.1083/jcb.122.4.859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Smith D. B., Johnson K. S. Single-step purification of polypeptides expressed in Escherichia coli as fusions with glutathione S-transferase. Gene. 1988 Jul 15;67(1):31–40. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90005-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Stewart R. J., Thaler J. P., Goldstein L. S. Direction of microtubule movement is an intrinsic property of the motor domains of kinesin heavy chain and Drosophila ncd protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jun 1;90(11):5209–5213. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.11.5209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Studier F. W., Rosenberg A. H., Dunn J. J., Dubendorff J. W. Use of T7 RNA polymerase to direct expression of cloned genes. Methods Enzymol. 1990;185:60–89. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(90)85008-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Vale R. D., Schnapp B. J., Mitchison T., Steuer E., Reese T. S., Sheetz M. P. Different axoplasmic proteins generate movement in opposite directions along microtubules in vitro. Cell. 1985 Dec;43(3 Pt 2):623–632. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90234-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Vale R. D., Toyoshima Y. Y. Rotation and translocation of microtubules in vitro induced by dyneins from Tetrahymena cilia. Cell. 1988 Feb 12;52(3):459–469. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(88)80038-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Vallen E. A., Hiller M. A., Scherson T. Y., Rose M. D. Separate domains of KAR1 mediate distinct functions in mitosis and nuclear fusion. J Cell Biol. 1992 Jun;117(6):1277–1287. doi: 10.1083/jcb.117.6.1277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Walker R. A., O'Brien E. T., Pryer N. K., Soboeiro M. F., Voter W. A., Erickson H. P., Salmon E. D. Dynamic instability of individual microtubules analyzed by video light microscopy: rate constants and transition frequencies. J Cell Biol. 1988 Oct;107(4):1437–1448. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.4.1437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Walker R. A., Salmon E. D., Endow S. A. The Drosophila claret segregation protein is a minus-end directed motor molecule. Nature. 1990 Oct 25;347(6295):780–782. doi: 10.1038/347780a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES