Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cancer. 2013 Oct 31;134(9):2199–2210. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28535

Interaction of allergy history and antibodies to specific Varicella zoster virus proteins on glioma risk

Seung-Tae Lee 1,2, Paige Bracci 1, Mi Zhou 1, Terri Rice 3, John Wiencke 3, Margaret Wrensch 3, Joseph Wiemels 1,*
PMCID: PMC3951480  NIHMSID: NIHMS532389  PMID: 24127236

Abstract

Glioma is the most common cancer of the central nervous system but with few confirmed risk factors. Glioma has been inversely associated with chicken pox, shingles, and seroreactivity to varicella virus (VZV), as well as to allergies and allergy-associated IgE. The role of antibody reactivity against individual VZV antigens has not been assessed. Ten VZV-related proteins, selected for high immunogenicity or known function, were synthesized and used as targets for antibody measurements in the sera of 143 glioma cases and 131 healthy controls selected from the San Francisco Bay Area Adult Glioma Study. Glioma cases exhibited significantly reduced seroreactivity compared to controls for six antigens, including proteins IE63 (OR = 0.26, 95%CI:0.12-0.58, comparing lowest quartile to highest), and the VZV-unique protein ORF2p (OR = 0.44, 95%CI:0.21-0.96, lowest quartile to highest). When stratifying the study population into those with low and high self-reported allergy history, VZV protein seroreactivity was only associated inversely with glioma among individuals self-reporting more than two allergies. The data provide insight into both allergy and VZV effects on glioma: strong anti-VZV reactions in highly allergic individuals is associated with reduced occurrence of glioma. This result suggests a role for specificity in the anti-VZV immunity in brain tumor suppression for both individual VZV antigens and in the fine-tuning of the immune response by allergy. Anti-VZV reactions may also be a biomarker of effective CNS immunosurveillance due to the tropism of the virus.

Keywords: glioma, varicella, serology, case-control, allergy

Introduction

Glioma was diagnosed in over 237,000 people in the world in 2008.1 Glioma has relatively few known risk factors, apart from ionizing radiation and a small number of confirmed inherited genetic variants.2 Infections and immune factors are thought to impact gliomagenesis; the brain hosts certain types of immune reactions and microglia cells are the resident macrophages in the brain.3

A potential viral etiology for brain tumors has long been suggested, starting with the investigation of the Simian polyomavirus SV40 which was a contaminant of polio vaccinations.4 While little evidence for polyomaviruses like SV40 has emerged, more recent studies imply a role for herpesviruses, primarily cytomegalovirus (CMV) and varicella virus (VZV). CMV is present as an active virus in most human gliomas and has some biological characteristics suggesting that it may contribute to the malignant phenotype.5 CMV remains under investigation as a tumor-promoting virus; however, the serological response to CMV is not significantly different in glioma patients compared to healthy controls.6 Anti-VZV IgG, on the other hand, was reported to have lower levels among glioma cases compared to controls, providing support that a serological response to VZV may be protective.6-8 Although the nature of this protective effect is not yet known, a recent study showed that the VZV virus can infect glioma cells, and this infection enhances T-cell mediated cytotoxicity.9 This suggests that VZV antigen(s) may produce protein epitopes which are cross-reactive with glioma antigen(s).9 The presence of VZV viral particles within human gliomas has not been reported.

VZV is a DNA-based alphaherpesvirus containing 71 open reading frames, 68 of which encode proteins and thus may provide immune targets.10 Like Herpes simplex 1 and 2, VZV infects mucoepithelial cells and following the clearing of disease (for VZV, chicken pox), VZV establishes latency in neurons. Individuals are typically exposed to VZV in early childhood, and the virus establishes long-term latency in dorsal root nerve ganglia. Reactivation of the virus often occurs in their fifth and sixth decades, leading to zoster (shingles).11

Along with viruses, increasing interest has focused on immune factors centered on allergies, which have been consistently reported to be less common in individuals who develop glioma compared to controls [reviewed in 12, 13]. Further, allergy-associated IgE and other allergy-related biomarkers also are inversely associated with glioma, even when assessed years prior to diagnosis.14-17 Our current study follows-up on our and others VZV and allergy-related IgE findings with a focus on two concepts: (i) Are their specific anti-VZV antibodies that are associated with a reduced risk to glioma? (ii) Is there a joint effect between prevalence of anti-VZV antibodies and history of allergy on glioma risk? To address these questions we used a panel of serological targets to VZV and the biological and data resources of the San Francisco Bay Area Adult Glioma Study (SFBAGS).

Materials and Methods

Study participants

Histologically confirmed glioma patients (International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, morphology codes 9380-9481) diagnosed from November 1991 to September 1999 (before the widespread introduction of temozolomide chemotherapy) were identified using the Northern California Rapid Case Ascertainment program. Eligible cases for the current analysis were aged 20 or older, white, no history of temozolomide exposure, and resided in the 6 county San Francisco Bay Area, (Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, San Mateo, San Francisco, and Santa Clara), and had a blood specimen. All glioma diagnoses were reviewed by an academic neuropathologist as previously described.18 Controls aged 20 years or older from the same residential area as cases were identified using random digit dialing and were frequency matched to cases by age (five year groupings), gender and ethnicity. In-person interviews were conducted with cases (or their proxies) and controls, and allergy history assessment questions were asked as detailed in our earlier manuscript on the association between allergies and glioma risk in the same study population.18 This allergy assessment was a detailed history collected in tabular form on 6 questionnaire pages. Prevalence of allergy (respiratory, dermal, and food) was 85% among controls as described previously 18; true allergies are likely to be present in those who exhibit multiple allergies.

Blood and sera were collected either at the time of interview or at a later time; on average about 4 months post-surgery for cases. At the time of venipuncture, participants were asked about currently used medications and recent chemo- and radiation therapy. Three hundred and forty-seven cases and 347 frequency-matched controls met the criteria for this sub-study with 143 cases and 131 controls randomly selected for these analyses. Data available for these individuals included serum IgE level, total serum anti-VZV level [assessed previously by ELISA assay using total VZV antigen 6], specific SNPs in chr9 that have been associated with allergies and glioma risk (rs1063192, rs1412829, rs2157719 and rs4977756), tumor IDH1/2 mutation status and allergy history.

Antigen Selection and Protein Synthesis

We selected VZV antigens with reportedly high seroprevalence in general population 19 and/or those with well-established biological functions 20, 21 from among the 68 known VZV proteins. Target proteins include glycoproteins E, H, I and K (gE, gH, gI and gK, respectively) and orf2, orf9, orf12, orf20, orf24, and orf26 proteins (ORF2p, ORF9p, ORF12p, ORF20p, ORF24p, and ORF26p, respectively) and two immediate early proteins, IE62 and IE63. The names and roles of ten VZV antigens successfully analyzed are presented in Table 1. Three proteins, gE, ORF9p and ORF26p were purchased from Fitzgerald Industries, Inc. (Concord, MA). For the remaining 9 proteins, gene synthesis and protein expression were performed through the Assembly PCR and cell free in vitro Wheat Germ Protein Expression System from Abnova (Taipei City, Taiwan).22

Table 1.

Ten open reading frame (ORF) antigens and related protein role; selected from among 71 open reading frames that encode 68 genes in the VZV genome for analysis in 143 glioma patients and 131 frequency-matched controls, San Francisco Bay Area, Adult Glioma Study. “Essential” means that this protein is required for that function, “Dispensable” means that it is not.

VZV antigen Gene HSV-1 homolog Name/role Viral replication Establishment of latency Reference
gK orf5 UL53 (gK) Glycoprotein K Essential - 45
gH orf37 UL22 (gH) Glycoprotein H - -
gI orf67 US7 (gI) Glycoprotein I Dispensable Dispensable 35, 44
gE orf68 US8 (gE) Glycoprotein E Essential - 35-37
ORF2p orf2 None Membrane phosphoprotein Dispensable Dispensable 46, 47
ORF12p orf12 UL46 (VP11/12) Tegument protein/transactivator Dispensable - 48
ORF20p orf20 UL38 (VP19C) Capsid protein - -
ORF24p orf24 UL34 Membrane protein - -
ORF26p orf26 UL32 Virion/packaging protein - -
IE63 orf63 US1 (ICP22) Tegument protein/transactivator Essential Essential 26-28

Luminex VZV Antibody Assay

Serum samples collected from each participant and stored in −70°C were tested for their antibodies against the different VZV antigens using the Luminex assays, a sandwich capture method.23 All experiments were done using the Bio-Plex™ Amine Coupling Kit and Bio-Plex Pro™ Magnetic COOH Beads (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA). Briefly, synthesized VZV antigens were coupled to carboxylated microspheres (beads) by using a two-step carbodiimide reaction. For multiplexing, the microspheres were designed to have different internal fluorescent dyes matched to different VZV antigens. Test sera sets were used to determine the titer and optimal dilution of sera. Antibody titers ranged from 1:1000 to 1:10,000, and a 1:100 dilution sufficed for all antigens except for two. Bead sets were incubated in pairs, triplex, and with all bead sets together with test sera to determine whether any assay interacted or affected the result of other assays when used in combination. Interactions were not demonstrated, and all bead sets were used together.

Serum samples were diluted 1:100 in duplex in a diluent made of PBS, 10% fetal bovine serum, and 2.5% CBS-K (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA). The diluted sera and coupled microspheres were co-incubated for 2 hours at room temperature on a shaker. After washing, a secondary antibody (Goat anti human IgG (H+L)-biotin, Southern Biotech 2085-08) was added and incubated for 30 minutes. The solution was then treated with streptavidin-conjugated R-phycoerythrin. After 10-minute incubation, microspheres were resuspended in 105 μL of assay buffer. The amount of antibodies bound to the microspheres was determined by the median fluorescence intensity of the reporter molecule, phycoerythrin, using the Bio-plex 200 plate reader system (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA). Cases and controls were randomized prior to analysis, and each plate was assayed with no more than 10% difference in numbers of cases and controls. All samples were assayed in duplicate (technical duplicate) and when coefficient of variation was more than 20% the assay repeated. Duplicates were averaged for further analysis.

Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS v9.3 (Research Triangle Park, NC). Continuous measures (log transformed anti-VZV analytes, VZV antibody and IgE levels) also were analyzed grouped in quantiles based on the distribution among controls. Preliminary analyses of the association among analytes, covariate factors and disease status were assessed using Wilcoxon rank sum for continuous variables, and Fisher's exact or Chi-square statistics for categorical data. Correlation between analytes and other covariates also were determined by disease status using Spearman's rank correlation. Analyte levels were evaluated in age and sex adjusted logistic regression models that used cluster methods to account for between plate differences. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for VZV analytes were computed from these models as estimates of the relative risk. Effect modification was evaluated in analyses stratified by sex, allergy history, median number of allergies, median IgE level, and median VZV level with formal tests of statistical interaction based on the Wald chi-square statistic for the cross-product term of a specific analyte and covariate of interest. Potential confounders including education, smoking status, history of allergies, median number of allergies, previously measured total VZV antibody level, current dexamethasone use, and IgE level were included in the final parsimonious models if they altered the odds ratio estimate by >10%. Analyses also were conducted for a composite analyte score that was computed as the sum of the number of analytes that were greater than the median for each individual. Independence of analyte effects were assessed in an adjusted logistic regression model that conditioned on all analytes.

Results

Examination of the distribution of analyte values showed good performance with the exception of two analytes, ORF9p and IE62, where results suggested “over-saturation” with most values clustered at fluorescent values at the upper limits of photomultiplier detection. Therefore we excluded these two analytes from further analyses. The distribution of all other anti-VZV antibody measures were right tailed, and approximately normal when log-transformed.

As shown in Table 2, cases and controls were similar for age, years of education, percent men, and cigarette smoking status (Table 1). Total serum anti-VZV levels (to the whole virus) was previously assessed in these participants 6. In this small participant sample, cases had lower median value than controls, but the difference was not significant (Table 2). Antibodies to Cytomegalovirus, Herpes Simplex I, and Epstein-Barr viruses were also assessed in these participants previously, and in the current sample (like the larger published dataset, 6), these measurements did not differ between cases and controls (P = 0.8, 0.2, and 0.2 for the three viruses, respectively, when comparing positive to negative measurements by χ2 test). A greater proportion of controls reported a history of allergies and controls were more likely to have higher IgE level than cases [as previously shown, 15].

Table 2.

Demographic characteristics and descriptive factors of white glioma cases and controls, San Francisco Bay Area Adult Glioma Study (AGS)

Factor controls N=131 cases N=143 p-valuea
Age in yrs (mean, standard error) 53.2, 1.30 52.8, 1.27
ln IgE (median, IQRb) 3.52, 2.04 2.80, 2.12 0.001
ln VZV (median, IQRb,c) 0.41, 1.28 0.31, 1.44 0.16
n (%) n (%)

Sex
    Women 52 40 58 41
    Men 79 60 85 59
Education Highest Degree
    HS 39 30 50 35
    Jr College 18 14 23 16
    College 48 37 42 29
    Graduate Degree 26 18 28 20
0.59
Cigarette smoking
    Never 54 42 59 41
    Past 52 40 58 41
    Current 24 18 25 18
0.98
Any allergy
    no 22 17 43 30
    yes 108 83 100 70
0.01
Median # of allergies
    ≤2 66 51 89 69
    >2 64 49 40 31
0.003
Median VZVc (raw level)
    <1.5 65 50 80 56
    1.5+ 66 50 63 34
0.29
Median IgE (raw level)
    <33.9 65 50 92 64
    33.9+ 66 50 51 36
0.01
Histology
    Glioblastoma 89 62
    Non-GBM (Grade II & III) 60 38
IDH1
    WT 82 70
    Mutated 34 29
    Inconclusive 1 1

Numbers may not sum to total due to missing values

a

p-value from Wilcoxon test (IgE and VZV), from Fisher's exact (any allergy) and from Chi-square (education, smoking); not presented for age and sex as these were matching factors

b

IQR - Interquartile range. Ln(IGE) and ln(VZV) levels were previously determined (reference #9 and 4 respectively).

c

Total VZV measured by ELISA and was previously assayed and reported 6.

Interestingly total anti-VZV (assessed previously, 6) was correlated with only two out of ten of the individual anti-VZV analytes, gI (rho=0.28, controls only) and ORF24p (cases, rho=0.20; controls, rho=0.18) (Supplemental Table 1). A number of analytes were correlated with any allergy history as well as with number of self-reported allergies. These correlations were generally inverse between cases and controls: negative among cases and positive in controls. Also, correlations were more likely to be statistically significant among controls than cases although statistically significant correlations between number of allergies and IE63 were observed both for cases (rho=-0.18, p=0.046) and controls (rho=0.35, p<0.0001, Supplementary Table 1).

IDH1/2 mutation status was available for 116 of the 143 cases in our VZV analyte assessment. Only one analyte was associated with IDH status; a positive correlation was observed with ORF12p (p=0.007) (Supplement Table 1). For the four chr9 SNPs evaluated, no associations with anti-VZV analytes were observed among controls. Several borderline (p<0.10) positive correlations were observed in cases although only the positive correlation between rs1063192 and ORF26p was statistically significant (rho=0.17, p=0.04).

Analyte levels were grouped into quartiles based on the distribution in control participants. Regardless of level or of specific analyte, increasing levels were associated with decreased occurrence of glioma (Table 3) and the trends were statistically significant for 6 of the 10 analytes (gH, IE63, gE, ORF26p, ORF2p, ORF20p; all p for trend <=0.05). Monotone trends were exhibited for anti-ORF20p and IE63. There was a borderline decreased risk observed for a seventh (ORF12p, p for trend=0.07). Median number of reported allergies (≤2, >2) and smoking status attenuated the associations of glioma to specific analytes and therefore are included in the final parsimonious models as appropriate (noted in footnote in Table 3). Overall, those with analyte levels in the highest quartile were 45-84% (depending on the specific analyte) less likely to have glioma than were those with levels in the lowest quartile (Table 3).

Table 3.

Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for glioma associated with levels of specific VZV analytes grouped by quartiles, San Francisco Bay Area Adult Glioma Study

Quartile Groups Cases (N=143) Controls (N=131) OR, 95%CIa
gKc
<8.03 56 (39) b 33 (25) ref
8.03-<8.67 23 (16) 33 (25) 0.35, 0.17-0.72
8.67-<9.66 25 (17) 31 (24) 0.46, 0.20-1.08
9.66+ 39 (27) 34 (26) 0.66, 0.40-1.09
P for trend 0.23
gHc
<7.88 58 (40) 33 (25) ref
7.88-<8.12 27 (19) 33 (25) 0.39, 0.25-0.59
8.12-<8.89 46 (32) 32 (24) 0.67, 0.35-1.30
8.89+ 12 (8) 33 (25) 0.16, 0.08-0.32
P for trend 0.0003
gId
<8.15 39 (27) 33 (25) ref
8.15-,9.06 43 (30) 32 (24) 1.08, 0.74-1.58
9.06 - ,9.98 32 (22) 33 (25) 0.79, 0.48-1.32
9.98+ 29 (20) 33 (25) 0.71, 0.31-1.64
P for trend 0.36
gEc
<8.16 51 (36) 31 (24) ref
8.16-<8.6 31 (22) 34 (26) 0.59, 0.34-1.05
8.6-<9.1 26 (18) 33 (25) 0.44, 0.26-0.72
9.1+ 35 (24) 33 (25) 0.55, 0.33-0.90
P for trend 0.0002
ORF2pc
<7.52 59 (41) 33 (25) ref
7.52-,7.96 34 (24) 33 (25) 0.56, 0.32-0.98
7.96 -<8.41 19 (13) 32 (24) 0.30, 0.21-0.42
8.41+ 31 (22) 33 (25) 0.44, 0.21-0.96
P for trend 0.001
ORF12pe
<7.33 45 (31) 33 (25) ref
7.33-<7.88 42 (29) 32 (24) 1.04, 0.40-2.69
7.88-<8.57 29 (20) 34 (26) 0.56, 0.31-1.02
8.57+ 27 (19) 32 (24) 0.47, 0.15-1.46
P for trend 0.07
ORF20pc
<7.29 55 (38) 33 (25) ref
7.29-<7.61 32 (22) 32 (24) 0.56, 0.28-1.13
7.61 -<8.12 28 (20) 33 (25) 0.44, 0.23-0.85
8.12+ 28 (20) 33 (25) 0.42, 0.23-0.79
P for trend 0.0009
ORF24pa
<8.03 48 (34) 33 (25) ref
8.03-<8.42 29 (20) 33 (25) 0.60, 0.38-0.95
8.42 -9.04 31 (22) 32 (24) 0.66, 0.36-1.21
9.04+ 35 (24) 33 (25) 0.73, 0.35-1.51
P for trend 0.46
ORF26pe
<8.40 53 (37) 33 (25) ref
8.40-<8.68 30 (21) 32 (24) 0.50, 0.20-1.26
8.68-<8.94 30 (21) 33 (25) 0.55, 0.30-0.98
8.94+ 30 (21) 33 (25) 0.41, 0.15-1.13
P for trend 0.05
IE63e
<7.07 54 (38) 33 (25) ref
7.07-<7.50 38 (26) 33 (25) 0.54, 0.34-0.86
7.50-<8.08 30 (21) 32 (24) 0.44, 0.23-0.81
8.08+ 21 (15) 33 (25) 0.26, 0.12-0.58
P for trend <.0001
a

adjusted for age, sex, clustered by plate

b

Number of participants in category and (percent)

c

adjusted for ≤ 2 allergies vs. >2 allergies, age, sex clustered by plate

d

adjusted for smoking (never, current, former), age and sex, clustered by plate

e

adjusted for ≤ 2 allergies vs. >2 allergies, smoking, age and sex clustered by plate

In age and sex adjusted logistic regression analyses that included clustering by plate, mutual adjustment for analytes as log transformed continuous variables showed that ORF2p, IE63, gH and ORF12p were independently associated with glioma (all p <0.02, data not tabled). Consistent with main effect results, increased levels of ORF2p, IE63, and gH were associated with decreased glioma occurrence; however, the odds of glioma increased 27% for each unit increase of ORF12p. Analysis of glioma associations by sum of the number of analytes above the median yielded an OR = 0.91 (95% CI 0.86-0.95, P < 0.0001, data not tabled).

Results of analyses by sex (Table 4A) demonstrate significant interactions. Decreased occurrence of glioma with increased levels of analytes was observed for gI and gK among women and IE63 and ORF12p among men (p interaction: <0.0001, 0.04, 0.003, 0.01 respectively). This result was not driven by gender differences among controls, as there were no significant differences in anti-VZV antibody levels between genders in controls (Wilcoxon rank test, P values range from 0.11 to 0.99).

Table 4A.

Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for quartiles of log transformed VZV analyte levels associated with glioma stratified by sex, San Francisco Bay Area Adult Glioma Study.

VZV analyte quartiles Sex
Women Men
gK
ctrl/ca OR 95% CI ctrl/ca OR 95% CI pintxa
0 16/27 ref 17/29 ref
1 9/16 1.05, 0.57-1.93 24/7 0.17, 0.05-0.55
2 15/7 0.28, 0.12-0.65 16/18 0.66, 0.29-1.51
3 12/8 0.40, 0.16-0.99 22/31 0.85, 0.44-1.64
P for trend 0.006 0.72 0.04
gH
0 18/27 ref 14/31 ref
1 13/9 0.46, 0.33-0.64 21/18 0.38, 0.16-0.91
2 6/19 2.11, 0.60-7.52 26/27 0.46, 0.25-0.83
3 15/3 0.13, 0.04-0.44 18/9 0.22, 0.08-0.56
0.01 0.0009 0.42
gI
0 14/20 ref 19/19 ref
1 12/22 1.28, 0.66-2.49 20/21 1.0, 0.71-1.55
2 12/8 0.46, 0.18-1.22 21/24 1.14, 0.76-1.69
3 14/8 0.40, 0.17-0.93 19/21 1.09, 0.42-2.83
0.02 0.80 <0.0001
gE
0 12/24 ref 19/27 ref
1 15/11 0.36, 0.16-0.83 19/20 0.74, 0.46-1.22
2 15/12 0.40, 0.23-0.69 18/14 0.55, 0.24-1.24
3 10/11 0.55, 0.19-1.57 23/24 0.74, 0.58-0.94
0.15 <.0001 0.44
ORF2p
0 14/25 ref 19/34 ref
1 13/14 0.59, 0.32-1.10 20/20 0.56, 0.35-0.89
2 10/10 0.56, 0.26-1.18 22/9 0.23, 0.14-0.36
3 15/9 0.33, 0.17-0.64 18/22 0.67, 0.32-1.43
0.0001 0.04 0.25
ORF12p
0 17/19 ref 16/26 ref
1 12/16 1.17, 0.29-4.7 20/26 0.80, 0.38-1.67
2 12/10 0.73, 0.35-1.52 22/19 0.52, 0.27-1.01
3 11/13 1.04, 0.27-4.01 21/14 0.39, 0.20-0.75
0.86 0.001 0.01
ORF20p
0 17/25 ref 16/30 ref
1 11/12 0.74, 0.37-1.48 21/20 0.49, 0.20-1.20
2 10/11 0.74, 0.29-1.89 23/17 0.38, 0.18-0.84
3 14/10 0.48, 0.29-0.82 19/18 0.49, 0.26-0.95
<.0001 0.001 0.73
ORF24p
0 13/19 ref 20/29 ref
1 13/12 0.63, 0.26-1.51 20/17 0.59, 0.25-1.39
2 13/15 0.79, 0.36-1.72 19/16 0.57, 0.35-0.93
3 13/12 0.63, 0.25-1.58 20/23 0.79, 0.30-2.05
0.49 0.64 0.86
ORF26p
0 11/20 ref 22/33 ref
1 15/18 0.47, 0.17-1.30 17/17 0.67, 0.22-2.06
2 12/12 0.54, 0.34-0.86 22/18 0.55, 0.19-1.57
3 14/13 0.51, 0.18-1.49 18/17 0.63, 0.23-1.69
0.21 0.27 0.95
IE63
0 16/21 ref 17/33 ref
1 15/12 0.61, 0.22-1.63 18/26 0.72, 0.33-1.58
2 8/13 1.22, 0.67-2.22 24/17 0.35, 0.11-1.05
3 13/12 0.69, 0.32-1.51 20/9 0.21, 0.08-0.53
0.58 0.0001 0.003
a

P-value for the interaction between sex in the association between each VZV antigen and glioma case status.

We chose a cutoff of “3 or more” allergies to describe an allergic person. This choice was motivated by our previous results which indicate that the strongest case-control odds ratios were achieved with more than 2 allergies.18 Also, our allergy “prevalence” is about 85% among controls, which is much higher than the 30-40% commonly found in formal studies on allergy prevalence. This high prevalence is likely due to our 6-page extensive questionnaire on allergy symptoms, which are supplied by self-report rather than physician diagnosis. Results by median number of allergies (Table 4B) also demonstrate significant interactions. For gE, ORF2p, ORF12p, ORF20p, ORF24p and IE63, decreasing association with increased analyte levels were observed only among those with >2 allergies, all p interaction ≤0.02). For total serum anti-VZV IgG, a decreased trend was observed only among those with higher median total anti-VZV IgG and only for two specific analytes (gI, p interaction=0.03; gH, p interaction=0.02, data not shown). There was no evidence of an interaction between median IgE level and any analyte (data not shown).

Table 4B.

Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for quartiles of log transformed VZV analyte levels associated with glioma stratified by median number of allergies, San Francisco Bay Area Adult Glioma Study.

VZV analyte quartiles Number of Allergies (median split)
≤ 2 allergies >2 allergies
gK ctrl/ca OR 95% CI ctrl/ca OR 95% CI pintxa
0 19/35 ref 13/17 ref
1 14/13 0.51, 0.31-0.84 19/5 0.21, 0.04-1.03
2 15/17 0.35, 0.22-1.87 16/6 0.30, 0.08-1.08
3 18/24 0.72, 0.35-1.48 16/12 0.60, 0.25-1.43
0.48 0.32 0.74
gH
0 19/35 ref 12/21 ref
1 15/15 0.54, 0.32-0.94 19/8 0.25, 0.14-0.44
2 15/30 1.08, 0.57-2.05 17/10 0.33, 0.12-0.86
3 17/9 0.28, 0.13-0.61 16/1 0.04, .003-0.41
0.01 <.0001 0.006
gI
0 17/27 ref 15/9 ref
1 13/24 1.14, 0.90-1.43 19/14 1.18, 0.44-3.17
2 20/20 0.62, 0.34-1.14 13/9 1.27, 0.46-3.54
3 16/18 0.69, 0.26-1.84 17/8 0.80, 0.24-2.71
0.27 0.71 0.67
gE
0 19/26 ref 11/20 ref
1 15/22 1.11, 0.58-2.11 19/9 0.26, 0.14-0.48
2 17/17 0.74, 0.45-1.22 16/6 0.20, 0.05-0.84
3 15/24 1.24, 0.61-2.50 18/5 0.15, 0.04-0.59
0.81 0.003 0.02
ORF2p
0 22/35 ref 10/21 ref
1 14/25 1.12, 0.52-2.37 19/7 0.18, 0.07-0.43
2 15/11 0.47, 0.26-0.83 17/5 0.14, 0.06-0.33
3 15/18 0.75, 0.34-1.66 18/7 0.19, 0.08-0.44
0.14 0.0001 0.01
ORF12p
0 21/28 ref 11/14 ref
1 14/25 1.32, 0.35-4.90 18/15 0.66, 0.42-1.06
2 19/20 0.77, 0.23-2.56 15/7 0.38, 0.11-1.25
3 12/16 0.98, 0.29-3.27 20/4 0.16, 0.05-0.53
0.76 <.0001 0 007
ORF20p
0 23/32 ref 9/21 ref
1 16/22 0.97, 0.29-3.22 16/8 0.22, 0.08-0.60
2 14/19 0.96, 0.46-1.99 19/5 0.11, 0.04-0.32
3 13/16 0.88, 0.31-2.54 20/6 0.13, 0.09-0.18
0.79 <.0001 <0.0001
ORF24p
0 24/28 ref 8/17 ref
1 12/18 1.28, 0.58-2.82 21/8 0.17, 0.09-0.32
2 14/21 1.27, 0.54-2.97 18/7 0.18, 0.07-0.49
3 16/22 1.18, 0.43-3.20 17/8 0.22, 0.08-0.55
0.74 0.01 0.005
ORF26p
0 17/32 ref 15/18 ref
1 18/21 0.60, 0.28-1.33 14/7 0.41, 0.11-1.55
2 13/17 0.69, 0.38-1.24 21/11 0.43, 0.16-1.15
3 18/19 0.58, 0.20-1.69 14/4 0.24, 0.06-0.97
0.33 0.03 0.24
IE63
0 21/29 ref 11/22 ref
1 22/27 0.84, 0.56-1.27 11/9 0.41, 0.10-1.71
2 15/21 0.98, 0.41-2.39 17/6 0.17, 0.05-0.60
3 8/12 1.05, 0.46-2.40 25/3 0.06, 0.02-0.17
0.87 <.0001 <0.0001
a

P-value for the interaction between number of allergies in the association between each VZV antigen and glioma case status.

Dexamethosone is commonly used in glioma treatment, and 43% of this case group (59 of 136 patients) was under current treatment with dexamethasone at the time of blood draw. Only one control was taking the drug. Dexamethosone was significantly inversely associated with several anti-VZV targets including ORF2p, ORF20p, ORF24p, and ORF26p (P = 0.003, 0.01, 0.01, and 0.01 respectively) when comparing numbers of case participants in quartile levels of anti-VZV antibodies among those who were taking, and not taking, dexamethosone (by χ2 test). To account for this, we calculated case-control odds ratios stratifying the case group into those who did and did not take dexamethasone, and comparing both to the overall control group (Supplementary Table 2). Tertiles were used due to the smaller sample sizes in the two strata. Odds ratios were slightly attenuated by dexamethosone treatment, indicating either that the drug or the indication for the drug might have an effect on anti-VZV antibody levels; however, confidence intervals still excluded 1 for several anti-VZV antibodies in the non-dexamethosone group including those for gE, gH, and ORF12p (Supplementary Table 2). Odds ratios for most other analytes were in a similar direction in the dexamethasone strata compared to those not currently treated with dexamethasone, though not significant for the latter.

Discussion

In addition to the well-established inverse correlation between allergy or immunoglobulin E levels and glioma risk,12-16, 24 anti-VZV immunity is also clearly associated in the similar inverse direction. In a comprehensive analysis of familial and personal medical histories in adults with glioma, we previously showed that history of chickenpox and/or shingles was inversely correlated with case status.25 Subsequent serologic studies for four neurotropic herpesviruses, herpes simplex virus (HSV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), VZV and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), showed that only VZV-specific immunoglobulin levels were significantly and inversely associated with glioma risk.6-8 To obtain more detailed biological insights, the current study analyzed glioma patients’ serological responses against 10 different VZV proteins. Accordingly, antibodies to viral proteins showed strong inverse yet individually variable correlations with glioma risk, suggesting a connection of anti-VZV immunity to cancer development. Associations to individual proteins did not specify a single immunodominant epitope when assessed over our study population; but rather, several particularly strong associations to key VZV proteins and strong interactions of anti-VZV responses with self-reported allergy but not IgE levels.

In our final model, antibodies to IE63 was the most significant marker associated with glioma status (P<0.0001). The biological function of this or any other individual VZV protein is not implied to be linked to their immunogenicity, but may help instruct mechanisms behind the different immune responses of glioma patients from controls. IE63, an immediate early protein related to transcriptional activation during viral entry and replication, is the only protein proven to be essential for the establishment of latency, among the many VZV proteins studied so far.20, 26-29 It is required for viral immune evasion by suppression of interferon-α induced host antiviral response.30 Interestingly, IE63 also suppresses apoptosis of neurons.31 We also observed strong correlations of gE and gH with glioma, especially in men and in patients who reported more than 2 allergies. Of the seven membrane glycoproteins, gE is most abundantly expressed and thus highly immunogenic.32 Expressed in infected host cell membranes, gE plays a key role in cell fusion and viral propagation 33, 34 and is indispensible for viral infectivity and growth.35-37 VZV gH is also a major VZV fusogen required for endocytosis of viral particles.38, 39 Furthermore, gH contains an immunodominant complement-independent neutralization epitope, where directed antibodies can effectively block viral entry and spread.40-42

We could not find any significant association of gI, except for a borderline association in women. VZV gI forms a heterodimer with gE, enhancing its activity,43 but is found to be dispensable for viral growth or establishing latency.35, 44 Another glycoprotein, gK was insignificant in the parsimonious model but was significantly associated in women. This protein is less well studied, but one investigation found that gK may be essential for viral syncytia formation and growth.45 ORF2p and ORF20p were significant both in the parsimonious model and stratified analyses, while ORF12p was significant only in stratified analyses. While ORF2p and ORF12p are dispensable for in vitro growth;46-48 more relevantly, the high seroprevalence of antibodies to these proteins 19 suggests a possible link to host immune response. For the other less-well characterized proteins, ORF24p and ORF26p, negative to borderline levels of significance were reached, suggesting possible additive or bystander roles in immune responses.

This study has several weaknesses as well as strengths. First, we have assayed glioma cases after diagnosis, and gliomas and treatments for gliomas are known to suppress the immune system. We do note however that antibody levels other herpesviruses (anti-CMV, HSV1, and EBV) were not reduced in cases compared to controls. Also, our previous studies on other antibody markers did not detect effects on antibody levels from chemotherapies, comorbidities, time of day, season, or time since surgery.15 We did however detect effects of temozolomide treatment here,24 and therefore we excluded cases treated as such for the current analysis. Since temozolomide was introduced as “standard of care” over 10 years ago, our samples tested were older samples (pre-2000), with possibly some degradation of antibodies. We were however unable to detect differences in antibody levels by age of sample (data not shown). Dexamethosone here was also shown to affect specific antibody levels, an effect which was not detected in prior studies on other antibodies.6, 7 This affect attenuated some case-control differences, suggesting that prediagnostic or at least pre-treatment sera would be a better medium for assessing viral antibodies. Another potential weakness is related to sample sizes which are not large, leading to potentially spurious results particularly in subgroup analysis. For this reason, we cannot make any firm conclusions about gender effects despite many strong interactions. The consistency of the allergy/anti-VZV antibody interaction results, as well as clear variability among the various antigens, argues in favor of these results not being explained by glioma- or treatment-related effects or spurious variation. Another potential weakness is the apparent lack of interaction with IGE levels while self-reported allergy interaction is strong. While IGE levels are correlated with one type of allergy pathology, i.e., atopy, IGE levels are not an accurate assessment of allergy or a more definitive marker of the allergic pathology that affects glioma risk when compared to self-reported allergy.15, 24 Self-reported allergy may better capture a lifetime exposure to allergic pathologies that are relevant to glioma risk. Finally, our study was only able to capture a single blood sample from cases and controls, and did not establish the longitudinal variability of antibody measurements. While some variability is certain to be the case, varicella antigens are internally sourced and likely somewhat constant immune stimulants. Also, the relative differences between groups of people should be valid even if the absolute titers in individuals will vary over time.

Several hypotheses and issues could be raised for the underlying mechanisms of the association between anti-VZV immunity and glioma development. As a latent virus, VZV has an intrinsic potential to modulate tumor development through chronic infection and inflammation.11, 22 Cross-reactiveness between VZV and glioma cells was also suggested because VZV-stimulated cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) selectively kill glioma cells.9 Our results may favor the former hypothesis, i.e. tumor predisposition from chronic infection and inflammation, because the most significantly associated antigens are those critical for virulence. The varied response to VZV antigens is also likely to be related to individual variability in epitope presentation based on HLA variability. Future studies should consider anti-VZV antibody and T-cell responses in concert with the presentation of specific epitopes by HLA status.

VZV shares many homologous proteins with other herpes viruses, especially HSV. One protein, ORF2p, is unique to VZV with no homology to other HSV proteins (Table 2).21 This protein is strongly associated with case status, confirming a true association of VZV rather than other cross-reacting viruses. While we cannot rule out specific proteins as glioma epitopes, anti-VZV antibodies measured here could serve as a biomarker of the presence of strong CNS immunosurveillance mechanisms, a kind of immunologic beacon based on VZV's tropism to the CNS. The attraction of immune activity to the CNS by VZV may impart collateral protection from brain cancer, especially in persons with strong allergic phenotype-biased immune systems.

Cellular immunity by anti-VZV CTL (which kill infected cells) is known to play a principal role in the defense against viruses. Humoral immunity, which the current antibody study is directed, appears to play a minor role in controlling the virus.11, 20 We found significant associations only in hyper-allergic individuals (defined as number of allergies >2) whose humoral immunity is much enhanced.49 So it could be postulated that VZV antibodies are more effective and have a synergistic role in these “humorally-skewed,” individuals. We note that the brain is an immune-privileged site where immune mechanisms differ from peripheral tissues. The dominant mechanisms of viral clearance in brain appear not to be CTL-dependent cytolysis; but rather, mediated by complement-independent neutralizing antibodies or T cell cytokines such as interferon suppressing viral replication, to reduce inflammation and parenchymal damage.50 The humoral dominance of immune reactions in the brain could favor anti-tumor immunity in individuals with a T-helper-2 type immune dominance, a hypothesis suggested by ours and other's observations that individuals with strong allergies have lower brain cancer risk.12, 13 CTL-dependent cytolysis is still important as a first-line defense against VZV viral entry and propagation in skin mucosa and blood lymphocytes,11, 20 but increased VZV antibodies and enhanced humoral immunity may be more beneficial for long-term anti-glioma effects.

We also observed different associations according to gender. Antibodies to IE63, gE, gH and ORF12p were very significant in men, whereas those to gK, ORF2p and ORF20p were so in women (Table 4). The reason is unclear but it might be from the inherent differences in immune systems between men and women; both cellular and antibody-mediated immune responses are typically higher in women than men.51 Furthermore, women are more prone to T-helper-2 cytokine profiles related to humoral immunity.52 Such different immune profiles might lead to the gender differences in antigen recognition and effectiveness.

In summary, we studied associations of antibody levels to specific VZV proteins with glioma. Antibodies to proteins important for VZV virulence including IE63, gE and gH were among the most significantly associated with glioma case status, as well as ORF2p and ORF20p, suggesting a pivotal role of humoral immunities to these proteins. Such associations were only prominent in hyper-allergic patients whose humoral immunity is higher than in less allergic people. We also found a gender difference in associated antigens suggesting that different immune mechanisms may underlie differences in glioma risk among men and women. Our results require confirmation in additional larger studies with more anti-VZV markers but provide intriguing and compelling evidence on the relationship between anti-VZV immunity and glioma.

Supplementary Material

Supp Table S1-S2

Acknowledgments

We thank the participants of the San Francisco Bay Area Glioma Study. Funding: NIH/NCI: R01CA052689 (MRW, JKW), R01CA109745 (JLW), and a UCSF Brain SPORE developmental project to JLW (P50CA097257).

Funding: NIH/NCI: R01CA052689 (MRW), R01CA109745 (JLW)

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: None to report.

References

  • 1.Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893–917. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Liu Y, Shete S, Hosking FJ, Robertson LB, Bondy ML, Houlston RS. New insights into susceptibility to glioma. Arch Neurol. 2010;67:275–8. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rivest S. Regulation of innate immune responses in the brain. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9:429–39. doi: 10.1038/nri2565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shah KV. Does SV40 infection contribute to the development of human cancers? Rev Med Virol. 2000;10:31–43. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1654(200001/02)10:1<31::aid-rmv260>3.0.co;2-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dziurzynski K, Chang SM, Heimberger AB, Kalejta RF, McGregor Dallas SR, Smit M, Soroceanu L, Cobbs CS. Hcmv, Gliomas S. Consensus on the role of human cytomegalovirus in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2012;14:246–55. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nor227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wrensch M, Weinberg A, Wiencke J, Miike R, Sison J, Wiemels J, Barger G, DeLorenze G, Aldape K, Kelsey K. History of chickenpox and shingles and prevalence of antibodies to varicella-zoster virus and three other herpesviruses among adults with glioma and controls. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161:929–38. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wrensch M, Weinberg A, Wiencke J, Miike R, Barger G, Kelsey K. Prevalence of antibodies to four herpesviruses among adults with glioma and controls. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154:161–5. doi: 10.1093/aje/154.2.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sjostrom S, Hjalmars U, Juto P, Wadell G, Hallmans G, Tjonneland A, Halkjaer J, Manjer J, Almquist M, Melin BS. Human immunoglobulin G levels of viruses and associated glioma risk. Cancer Causes Control. 2011;22:1259–66. doi: 10.1007/s10552-011-9799-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Canniff J, Donson AM, Foreman NK, Weinberg A. Cytotoxicity of glioblastoma cells mediated ex vivo by varicella-zoster virus-specific T cells. J Neurovirol. 2011;17:448–54. doi: 10.1007/s13365-011-0048-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Davison AJ, Scott JE. The complete DNA sequence of varicella-zoster virus. J Gen Virol. 1986;67(Pt 9):1759–816. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-67-9-1759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gilden D, Mahalingam R, Nagel MA, Pugazhenthi S, Cohrs RJ. Review: The neurobiology of varicella zoster virus infection. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2011;37:441–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2011.01167.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chen C, Xu T, Chen J, Zhou J, Yan Y, Lu Y, Wu S. Allergy and risk of glioma: a meta-analysis. Eur J Neurol. 2011;18:387–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03187.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Linos E, Raine T, Alonso A, Michaud D. Atopy and risk of brain tumors: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:1544–50. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schwartzbaum J, Ding B, Johannesen TB, Osnes LT, Karavodin L, Ahlbom A, Feychting M, Grimsrud TK. Association between prediagnostic IgE levels and risk of glioma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:1251–9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wiemels JL, Wiencke JK, Patoka J, Moghadassi M, Chew T, McMillan A, Miike R, Barger G, Wrensch M. Reduced immunoglobulin E and allergy among adults with glioma compared with controls. Cancer Res. 2004;64:8468–73. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Schlehofer B, Siegmund B, Linseisen J, Schuz J, Rohrmann S, Becker S, Michaud D, Melin B, Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita H, Peeters PH, Vineis P, Tjonneland A, et al. Primary brain tumours and specific serum immunoglobulin E: a case-control study nested in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort. Allergy. 2011;66:1434–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02670.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhou M, Wiemels JL, Bracci PM, Wrensch MR, McCoy LS, Rice T, Sison JD, Patoka JS, Wiencke JK. Circulating levels of the innate and humoral immune regulators CD14 and CD23 are associated with adult glioma. Cancer Res. 2010;70:7534–42. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wiemels JL, Wiencke JK, Sison JD, Miike R, McMillan A, Wrensch M. History of allergies among adults with glioma and controls. Int J Cancer. 2002;98:609–15. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ceroni A, Sibani S, Baiker A, Pothineni VR, Bailer SM, LaBaer J, Haas J, Campbell CJ. Systematic analysis of the IgG antibody immune response against varicella zoster virus (VZV) using a self-assembled protein microarray. Mol Biosyst. 2010;6:1604–10. doi: 10.1039/c003798b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Quinlivan M, Breuer J. Molecular studies of Varicella zoster virus. Rev Med Virol. 2006;16:225–50. doi: 10.1002/rmv.502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cohen JI. The varicella-zoster virus genome. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2010;342:1–14. doi: 10.1007/82_2010_10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Takai K, Sawasaki T, Endo Y. Practical cell-free protein synthesis system using purified wheat embryos. Nat Protoc. 2010;5:227–38. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kellar KL, Kalwar RR, Dubois KA, Crouse D, Chafin WD, Kane BE. Multiplexed fluorescent bead-based immunoassays for quantitation of human cytokines in serum and culture supernatants. Cytometry. 2001;45:27–36. doi: 10.1002/1097-0320(20010901)45:1<27::aid-cyto1141>3.0.co;2-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wiemels JL, Wilson D, Patil C, Patoka J, McCoy L, Rice T, Schwartzbaum J, Heimberger A, Sampson JH, Chang S, Prados M, Wiencke JK, et al. IgE, allergy, and risk of glioma: update from the San Francisco Bay Area Adult Glioma Study in the temozolomide era. Int J Cancer. 2009;125:680–7. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wrensch M, Lee M, Miike R, Newman B, Barger G, Davis R, Wiencke J, Neuhaus J. Familial and personal medical history of cancer and nervous system conditions among adults with glioma and controls. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;145:581–93. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cohen JI, Krogmann T, Bontems S, Sadzot-Delvaux C, Pesnicak L. Regions of the varicella-zoster virus open reading frame 63 latency-associated protein important for replication in vitro are also critical for efficient establishment of latency. J Virol. 2005;79:5069–77. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.8.5069-5077.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sommer MH, Zagha E, Serrano OK, Ku CC, Zerboni L, Baiker A, Santos R, Spengler M, Lynch J, Grose C, Ruyechan W, Hay J, et al. Mutational analysis of the repeated open reading frames, ORFs 63 and 70 and ORFs 64 and 69, of varicella-zoster virus. J Virol. 2001;75:8224–39. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.17.8224-8239.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Baiker A, Fabel K, Cozzio A, Zerboni L, Fabel K, Sommer M, Uchida N, He D, Weissman I, Arvin AM. Varicella-zoster virus infection of human neural cells in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:10792–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404016101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Azarkh Y, Gilden D, Cohrs RJ. Molecular characterization of varicella zoster virus in latently infected human ganglia: physical state and abundance of VZV DNA, Quantitation of viral transcripts and detection of VZV-specific proteins. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2010;342:229–41. doi: 10.1007/82_2009_2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ambagala AP, Cohen JI. Varicella-Zoster virus IE63, a major viral latency protein, is required to inhibit the alpha interferon-induced antiviral response. J Virol. 2007;81:7844–51. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00325-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hood C, Cunningham AL, Slobedman B, Arvin AM, Sommer MH, Kinchington PR, Abendroth A. Varicella-zoster virus ORF63 inhibits apoptosis of primary human neurons. J Virol. 2006;80:1025–31. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.2.1025-1031.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Montalvo EA, Parmley RT, Grose C. Structural analysis of the varicellazoster virus gp98-gp62 complex: posttranslational addition of N-linked and O-linked oligosaccharide moieties. J Virol. 1985;53:761–70. doi: 10.1128/jvi.53.3.761-770.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Maresova L, Pasieka TJ, Grose C. Varicella-zoster Virus gB and gE coexpression, but not gB or gE alone, leads to abundant fusion and syncytium formation equivalent to those from gH and gL coexpression. J Virol. 2001;75:9483–92. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.19.9483-9492.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Berarducci B, Rajamani J, Reichelt M, Sommer M, Zerboni L, Arvin AM. Deletion of the first cysteine-rich region of the varicella-zoster virus glycoprotein E ectodomain abolishes the gE and gI interaction and differentially affects cell-cell spread and viral entry. J Virol. 2009;83:228–40. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00913-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mallory S, Sommer M, Arvin AM. Mutational analysis of the role of glycoprotein I in varicella-zoster virus replication and its effects on glycoprotein E conformation and trafficking. J Virol. 1997;71:8279–88. doi: 10.1128/jvi.71.11.8279-8288.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ali MA, Li Q, Fischer ER, Cohen JI. The insulin degrading enzyme binding domain of varicella-zoster virus (VZV) glycoprotein E is important for cell-to-cell spread and VZV infectivity, while a glycoprotein I binding domain is essential for infection. Virology. 2009;386:270–9. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2009.01.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zerboni L, Berarducci B, Rajamani J, Jones CD, Zehnder JL, Arvin A. Varicella-zoster virus glycoprotein E is a critical determinant of virulence in the SCID mouse-human model of neuropathogenesis. J Virol. 2011;85:98–111. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01902-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Duus KM, Hatfield C, Grose C. Cell surface expression and fusion by the varicella-zoster virus gH:gL glycoprotein complex: analysis by laser scanning confocal microscopy. Virology. 1995;210:429–40. doi: 10.1006/viro.1995.1359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pasieka TJ, Maresova L, Grose C. A functional YNKI motif in the short cytoplasmic tail of varicella-zoster virus glycoprotein gH mediates clathrin-dependent and antibody-independent endocytosis. J Virol. 2003;77:4191–204. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.7.4191-4204.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Montalvo EA, Grose C. Neutralization epitope of varicella zoster virus on native viral glycoprotein gp118 (VZV glycoprotein gpIII). Virology. 1986;149:230–41. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(86)90124-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Vleck SE, Oliver SL, Reichelt M, Rajamani J, Zerboni L, Jones C, Zehnder J, Grose C, Arvin AM. Anti-glycoprotein H antibody impairs the pathogenicity of varicellazoster virus in skin xenografts in the SCID mouse model. J Virol. 2010;84:141–52. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01338-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rodriguez JE, Moninger T, Grose C. Entry and egress of varicella virus blocked by same anti-gH monoclonal antibody. Virology. 1993;196:840–4. doi: 10.1006/viro.1993.1543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kimura H, Straus SE, Williams RK. Varicella-zoster virus glycoproteins E and I expressed in insect cells form a heterodimer that requires the N-terminal domain of glycoprotein I. Virology. 1997;233:382–91. doi: 10.1006/viro.1997.8625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Grinfeld E, Sadzot-Delvaux C, Kennedy PG. Varicella-Zoster virus proteins encoded by open reading frames 14 and 67 are both dispensable for the establishment of latency in a rat model. Virology. 2004;323:85–90. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2004.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mo C, Suen J, Sommer M, Arvin A. Characterization of Varicella-Zoster virus glycoprotein K (open reading frame 5) and its role in virus growth. J Virol. 1999;73:4197–207. doi: 10.1128/jvi.73.5.4197-4207.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sato H, Pesnicak L, Cohen JI. Varicella-zoster virus open reading frame 2 encodes a membrane phosphoprotein that is dispensable for viral replication and for establishment of latency. J Virol. 2002;76:3575–8. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.7.3575-3578.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhang Z, Rowe J, Wang W, Sommer M, Arvin A, Moffat J, Zhu H. Genetic analysis of varicella-zoster virus ORF0 to ORF4 by use of a novel luciferase bacterial artificial chromosome system. J Virol. 2007;81:9024–33. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02666-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Che X, Reichelt M, Sommer MH, Rajamani J, Zerboni L, Arvin AM. Functions of the ORF9-to-ORF12 gene cluster in varicella-zoster virus replication and in the pathogenesis of skin infection. J Virol. 2008;82:5825–34. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00303-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Joos L, Carlen Brutsche IE, Laule-Kilian K, Crawen M, Tamm M, Brutsche MH. Systemic Th1- and Th2-gene signals in atopy and asthma. Swiss Med Wkly. 2004;134:159–64. doi: 10.4414/smw.2004.10309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Binder GK, Griffin DE. Immune-mediated clearance of virus from the central nervous system. Microbes Infect. 2003;5:439–48. doi: 10.1016/s1286-4579(03)00047-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bouman A, Heineman MJ, Faas MM. Sex hormones and the immune response in humans. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11:411–23. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmi008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Giron-Gonzalez JA, Moral FJ, Elvira J, Garcia-Gil D, Guerrero F, Gavilan I, Escobar L. Consistent production of a higher TH1:TH2 cytokine ratio by stimulated T cells in men compared with women. Eur J Endocrinol. 2000;143:31–6. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1430031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp Table S1-S2

RESOURCES