Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1994 Aug 15;13(16):3902–3908. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06701.x

A mutational analysis of the two motifs common to adenine methyltransferases.

D F Willcock 1, D T Dryden 1, N E Murray 1
PMCID: PMC395303  PMID: 8070417

Abstract

All methyltransferases that use S-adenosyl methionine as the methyl group donor contain a sequence similar to (D/E/S)XFXGXG which has been postulated to form part of the cofactor binding site. In N6-adenine DNA methyltransferases there is a second motif, (D/N)PP(Y/F), which has been proposed to play a role similar to the catalytically essential PC motif conserved in all C5-cytosine DNA methyltransferases. We have made a series of amino acid changes in these two motifs in the EcoKI N6-adenine DNA methyltransferase. The mutant enzymes have been purified to homogeneity and characterized by physical biochemical methods. The first G is the most conserved residue in motif I. Changing this G to D completely abolished S-adenosyl methionine binding, but left enzyme structure and DNA target recognition unaltered, thus documenting the S-adenosyl methionine binding function of motif I in N6-adenine methyltransferases. Substitution of the N with D, or F with either G or C, in motif II abolished enzyme activity, but left S-adenosyl methionine and DNA binding unaltered. Changes of F to Y or W resulted in partial enzyme activity, implying that an aromatic residue is important for methylation. The substitution of W for F greatly enhanced UV-induced cross-linking between the enzyme and S-adenosyl methionine, suggesting that the aromatic residue is close in space to the methyl-group donor.

Full text

PDF
3902

Images in this article

3903Image
on p.3903
3904Image
on p.3904
3905Image
on p.3905

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Appleyard R K. Segregation of New Lysogenic Types during Growth of a Doubly Lysogenic Strain Derived from Escherichia Coli K12. Genetics. 1954 Jul;39(4):440–452. doi: 10.1093/genetics/39.4.440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barras F., Marinus M. G. The great GATC: DNA methylation in E. coli. Trends Genet. 1989 May;5(5):139–143. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(89)90054-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bickle T. A., Krüger D. H. Biology of DNA restriction. Microbiol Rev. 1993 Jun;57(2):434–450. doi: 10.1128/mr.57.2.434-450.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bird A. P. CpG-rich islands and the function of DNA methylation. Nature. 1986 May 15;321(6067):209–213. doi: 10.1038/321209a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen L., MacMillan A. M., Chang W., Ezaz-Nikpay K., Lane W. S., Verdine G. L. Direct identification of the active-site nucleophile in a DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase. Biochemistry. 1991 Nov 19;30(46):11018–11025. doi: 10.1021/bi00110a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cheng X., Kumar S., Posfai J., Pflugrath J. W., Roberts R. J. Crystal structure of the HhaI DNA methyltransferase complexed with S-adenosyl-L-methionine. Cell. 1993 Jul 30;74(2):299–307. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90421-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cooper L. P., Dryden D. T. The domains of a type I DNA methyltransferase. Interactions and role in recognition of DNA methylation. J Mol Biol. 1994 Mar 4;236(4):1011–1021. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(94)90008-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Degtyarev Skh, Prikhod'ko E. A., Prikhod'ko G. G., Krasnykh V. N. Vspl methylase belongs to m6A-gamma class of adenine methylases. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Apr 25;21(8):2015–2015. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.8.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dryden D. T., Cooper L. P., Murray N. E. Purification and characterization of the methyltransferase from the type 1 restriction and modification system of Escherichia coli K12. J Biol Chem. 1993 Jun 25;268(18):13228–13236. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fürste J. P., Pansegrau W., Frank R., Blöcker H., Scholz P., Bagdasarian M., Lanka E. Molecular cloning of the plasmid RP4 primase region in a multi-host-range tacP expression vector. Gene. 1986;48(1):119–131. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(86)90358-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gough J. A., Murray N. E. Sequence diversity among related genes for recognition of specific targets in DNA molecules. J Mol Biol. 1983 May 5;166(1):1–19. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80047-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Guyot J. B., Grassi J., Hahn U., Guschlbauer W. The role of the preserved sequences of Dam methylase. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Jul 11;21(14):3183–3190. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.14.3183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hattman S., Wilkinson J., Swinton D., Schlagman S., Macdonald P. M., Mosig G. Common evolutionary origin of the phage T4 dam and host Escherichia coli dam DNA-adenine methyltransferase genes. J Bacteriol. 1985 Nov;164(2):932–937. doi: 10.1128/jb.164.2.932-937.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Heitman J. On the origins, structures and functions of restriction-modification enzymes. Genet Eng (N Y) 1993;15:57–108. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-1666-2_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kan N. C., Lautenberger J. A., Edgell M. H., Hutchison C. A., 3rd The nucleotide sequence recognized by the Escherichia coli K12 restriction and modification enzymes. J Mol Biol. 1979 May 15;130(2):191–209. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(79)90426-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kelleher J. E., Daniel A. S., Murray N. E. Mutations that confer de novo activity upon a maintenance methyltransferase. J Mol Biol. 1991 Sep 20;221(2):431–440. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)80064-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Klimasauskas S., Kumar S., Roberts R. J., Cheng X. HhaI methyltransferase flips its target base out of the DNA helix. Cell. 1994 Jan 28;76(2):357–369. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90342-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Klimasauskas S., Timinskas A., Menkevicius S., Butkienè D., Butkus V., Janulaitis A. Sequence motifs characteristic of DNA[cytosine-N4]methyltransferases: similarity to adenine and cytosine-C5 DNA-methylases. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Dec 11;17(23):9823–9832. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.23.9823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kossykh V. G., Schlagman S. L., Hattman S. Conserved sequence motif DPPY in region IV of the phage T4 Dam DNA-[N-adenine]-methyltransferase is important for S-adenosyl-L-methionine binding. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Jul 25;21(15):3563–3566. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.15.3563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kramer B., Kramer W., Fritz H. J. Different base/base mismatches are corrected with different efficiencies by the methyl-directed DNA mismatch-repair system of E. coli. Cell. 1984 Oct;38(3):879–887. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90283-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kumar S., Cheng X., Klimasauskas S., Mi S., Posfai J., Roberts R. J., Wilson G. G. The DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferases. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Jan 11;22(1):1–10. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Loenen W. A., Daniel A. S., Braymer H. D., Murray N. E. Organization and sequence of the hsd genes of Escherichia coli K-12. J Mol Biol. 1987 Nov 20;198(2):159–170. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90303-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Midgley C. A., Murray N. E. T4 polynucleotide kinase; cloning of the gene (pseT) and amplification of its product. EMBO J. 1985 Oct;4(10):2695–2703. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb03989.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Murray N. E., Brammar W. J., Murray K. Lambdoid phages that simplify the recovery of in vitro recombinants. Mol Gen Genet. 1977 Jan 7;150(1):53–61. doi: 10.1007/BF02425325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Noyer-Weidner M., Trautner T. A. Methylation of DNA in prokaryotes. EXS. 1993;64:39–108. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-9118-9_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Powell L. M., Dryden D. T., Willcock D. F., Pain R. H., Murray N. E. DNA recognition by the EcoK methyltransferase. The influence of DNA methylation and the cofactor S-adenosyl-L-methionine. J Mol Biol. 1993 Nov 5;234(1):60–71. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pósfai J., Bhagwat A. S., Pósfai G., Roberts R. J. Predictive motifs derived from cytosine methyltransferases. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Apr 11;17(7):2421–2435. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.7.2421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sain B., Murray N. E. The hsd (host specificity) genes of E. coli K 12. Mol Gen Genet. 1980;180(1):35–46. doi: 10.1007/BF00267350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sharp P. M., Kelleher J. E., Daniel A. S., Cowan G. M., Murray N. E. Roles of selection and recombination in the evolution of type I restriction-modification systems in enterobacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Oct 15;89(20):9836–9840. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.20.9836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sugisaki H., Kita K., Takanami M. The FokI restriction-modification system. II. Presence of two domains in FokI methylase responsible for modification of different DNA strands. J Biol Chem. 1989 Apr 5;264(10):5757–5761. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Suri B., Bickle T. A. EcoA: the first member of a new family of type I restriction modification systems. Gene organization and enzymatic activities. J Mol Biol. 1985 Nov 5;186(1):77–85. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90258-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Tabor S., Richardson C. C. DNA sequence analysis with a modified bacteriophage T7 DNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Jul;84(14):4767–4771. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.14.4767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Vidgren J., Svensson L. A., Liljas A. Crystal structure of catechol O-methyltransferase. Nature. 1994 Mar 24;368(6469):354–358. doi: 10.1038/368354a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wilke K., Rauhut E., Noyer-Weidner M., Lauster R., Pawlek B., Behrens B., Trautner T. A. Sequential order of target-recognizing domains in multispecific DNA-methyltransferases. EMBO J. 1988 Aug;7(8):2601–2609. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03110.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wilson G. G., Murray N. E. Restriction and modification systems. Annu Rev Genet. 1991;25:585–627. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.25.120191.003101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Yanisch-Perron C., Vieira J., Messing J. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene. 1985;33(1):103–119. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(85)90120-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zoller M. J., Smith M. Oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis of DNA fragments cloned into M13 vectors. Methods Enzymol. 1983;100:468–500. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)00074-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES