Skip to main content
PMC home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1994 Oct 17;13(20):4856–4862. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06812.x

The transactivation domain of Pho4 is required for nucleosome disruption at the PHO5 promoter.

J Svaren 1, J Schmitz 1, W Hörz 1
PMCID: PMC395425  PMID: 7957055

Abstract

The chromatin structure of the PHO5 promoter is disrupted when the promoter is derepressed by phosphate starvation. The transactivator, Pho4, is primarily responsible for this change. We have used deletion mutations of Pho4 in order to determine which protein domains are involved in nucleosome dissolution. Our results show that the DNA binding domain by itself is not sufficient to trigger chromatin disruption, even when overexpressed. In vivo footprinting reveals that Pho4 derivatives lacking the N-terminal activation domain can bind to UASp1, which resides in a constitutively nucleosome-free region, but not to UASp2, which lies within a nucleosome in the repressed PHO5 promoter. The acidic activation domain of Pho4 appears to be involved in nucleosome disruption. Substitution of the native transactivation domain of Pho4 with that from VP16 results in substantial chromatin disruption. In every case, the ability of the Pho4 mutants to activate transcription correlates with their ability to disrupt nucleosome structure in the PHO5 promoter. Therefore, we conclude that the Pho4 activation domain has at least two roles: (i) to trigger disruption of nucleosome structure over the promoter, thereby facilitating the binding of transcription factors, and (ii) to interact with the transcriptional apparatus at the proximal promoter.

Full text

PDF
4856

Images in this article

4857Image
on p.4857
4858Image
on p.4858
4859Image
on p.4859
4859Image
on p.4859
4860Image
on p.4860
4861Image
on p.4861

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams C. C., Workman J. L. Nucleosome displacement in transcription. Cell. 1993 Feb 12;72(3):305–308. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90109-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Almer A., Hörz W. Nuclease hypersensitive regions with adjacent positioned nucleosomes mark the gene boundaries of the PHO5/PHO3 locus in yeast. EMBO J. 1986 Oct;5(10):2681–2687. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04551.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Almer A., Rudolph H., Hinnen A., Hörz W. Removal of positioned nucleosomes from the yeast PHO5 promoter upon PHO5 induction releases additional upstream activating DNA elements. EMBO J. 1986 Oct;5(10):2689–2696. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04552.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Axelrod J. D., Reagan M. S., Majors J. GAL4 disrupts a repressing nucleosome during activation of GAL1 transcription in vivo. Genes Dev. 1993 May;7(5):857–869. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.5.857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barbarić S., Fascher K. D., Hörz W. Activation of the weakly regulated PHO8 promoter in S. cerevisiae: chromatin transition and binding sites for the positive regulatory protein PHO4. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Mar 11;20(5):1031–1038. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.5.1031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Berger S. L., Piña B., Silverman N., Marcus G. A., Agapite J., Regier J. L., Triezenberg S. J., Guarente L. Genetic isolation of ADA2: a potential transcriptional adaptor required for function of certain acidic activation domains. Cell. 1992 Jul 24;70(2):251–265. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90100-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen H., Li B., Workman J. L. A histone-binding protein, nucleoplasmin, stimulates transcription factor binding to nucleosomes and factor-induced nucleosome disassembly. EMBO J. 1994 Jan 15;13(2):380–390. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06272.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cousens D. J., Greaves R., Goding C. R., O'Hare P. The C-terminal 79 amino acids of the herpes simplex virus regulatory protein, Vmw65, efficiently activate transcription in yeast and mammalian cells in chimeric DNA-binding proteins. EMBO J. 1989 Aug;8(8):2337–2342. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08361.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cress W. D., Triezenberg S. J. Critical structural elements of the VP16 transcriptional activation domain. Science. 1991 Jan 4;251(4989):87–90. doi: 10.1126/science.1846049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dalrymple M. A., McGeoch D. J., Davison A. J., Preston C. M. DNA sequence of the herpes simplex virus type 1 gene whose product is responsible for transcriptional activation of immediate early promoters. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 Nov 11;13(21):7865–7879. doi: 10.1093/nar/13.21.7865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fascher K. D., Schmitz J., Hörz W. Role of trans-activating proteins in the generation of active chromatin at the PHO5 promoter in S. cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1990 Aug;9(8):2523–2528. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07432.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fascher K. D., Schmitz J., Hörz W. Structural and functional requirements for the chromatin transition at the PHO5 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae upon PHO5 activation. J Mol Biol. 1993 Jun 5;231(3):658–667. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Felsenfeld G. Chromatin as an essential part of the transcriptional mechanism. Nature. 1992 Jan 16;355(6357):219–224. doi: 10.1038/355219a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fisher F., Goding C. R. Single amino acid substitutions alter helix-loop-helix protein specificity for bases flanking the core CANNTG motif. EMBO J. 1992 Nov;11(11):4103–4109. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05503.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Haguenauer-Tsapis R., Hinnen A. A deletion that includes the signal peptidase cleavage site impairs processing, glycosylation, and secretion of cell surface yeast acid phosphatase. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Dec;4(12):2668–2675. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.12.2668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hahn S. Structure(?) and function of acidic transcription activators. Cell. 1993 Feb 26;72(4):481–483. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90064-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jayaraman P. S., Hirst K., Goding C. R. The activation domain of a basic helix-loop-helix protein is masked by repressor interaction with domains distinct from that required for transcription regulation. EMBO J. 1994 May 1;13(9):2192–2199. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06496.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kaffman A., Herskowitz I., Tjian R., O'Shea E. K. Phosphorylation of the transcription factor PHO4 by a cyclin-CDK complex, PHO80-PHO85. Science. 1994 Feb 25;263(5150):1153–1156. doi: 10.1126/science.8108735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Morse R. H. Nucleosome disruption by transcription factor binding in yeast. Science. 1993 Dec 3;262(5139):1563–1566. doi: 10.1126/science.8248805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Myers A. M., Tzagoloff A., Kinney D. M., Lusty C. J. Yeast shuttle and integrative vectors with multiple cloning sites suitable for construction of lacZ fusions. Gene. 1986;45(3):299–310. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(86)90028-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ogawa N., Oshima Y. Functional domains of a positive regulatory protein, PHO4, for transcriptional control of the phosphatase regulon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 May;10(5):2224–2236. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.5.2224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Okada H., Toh-e A. A novel mutation occurring in the PHO80 gene suppresses the PHO4c mutations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet. 1992 Feb;21(2):95–99. doi: 10.1007/BF00318466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Perlmann T., Wrange O. Specific glucocorticoid receptor binding to DNA reconstituted in a nucleosome. EMBO J. 1988 Oct;7(10):3073–3079. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03172.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pham T. A., Hwung Y. P., McDonnell D. P., O'Malley B. W. Transactivation functions facilitate the disruption of chromatin structure by estrogen receptor derivatives in vivo. J Biol Chem. 1991 Sep 25;266(27):18179–18187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Piña B., Brüggemeier U., Beato M. Nucleosome positioning modulates accessibility of regulatory proteins to the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter. Cell. 1990 Mar 9;60(5):719–731. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90087-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rose A. B., Broach J. R. Propagation and expression of cloned genes in yeast: 2-microns circle-based vectors. Methods Enzymol. 1990;185:234–279. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(90)85024-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sarkar G., Sommer S. S. The "megaprimer" method of site-directed mutagenesis. Biotechniques. 1990 Apr;8(4):404–407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schmid A., Fascher K. D., Hörz W. Nucleosome disruption at the yeast PHO5 promoter upon PHO5 induction occurs in the absence of DNA replication. Cell. 1992 Nov 27;71(5):853–864. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90560-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sikorski R. S., Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):19–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Straka C., Hörz W. A functional role for nucleosomes in the repression of a yeast promoter. EMBO J. 1991 Feb;10(2):361–368. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07957.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Svaren J., Chalkley R. The structure and assembly of active chromatin. Trends Genet. 1990 Feb;6(2):52–56. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(90)90074-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Svaren J., Hörz W. Histones, nucleosomes and transcription. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1993 Apr;3(2):219–225. doi: 10.1016/0959-437x(93)90026-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Taylor I. C., Workman J. L., Schuetz T. J., Kingston R. E. Facilitated binding of GAL4 and heat shock factor to nucleosomal templates: differential function of DNA-binding domains. Genes Dev. 1991 Jul;5(7):1285–1298. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.7.1285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Uesono Y., Tokai M., Tanaka K., Tohe A. Negative regulators of the PHO system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: characterization of PHO80 and PHO85. Mol Gen Genet. 1992 Feb;231(3):426–432. doi: 10.1007/BF00292712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Venter U., Hörz W. The acid phosphatase genes PHO10 and PHO11 in S. cerevisiae are located at the telomeres of chromosomes VIII and I. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Feb 25;17(4):1353–1369. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.4.1353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Venter U., Svaren J., Schmitz J., Schmid A., Hörz W. A nucleosome precludes binding of the transcription factor Pho4 in vivo to a critical target site in the PHO5 promoter. EMBO J. 1994 Oct 17;13(20):4848–4855. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06811.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Vogel K., Hörz W., Hinnen A. The two positively acting regulatory proteins PHO2 and PHO4 physically interact with PHO5 upstream activation regions. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 May;9(5):2050–2057. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.5.2050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Winston F., Carlson M. Yeast SNF/SWI transcriptional activators and the SPT/SIN chromatin connection. Trends Genet. 1992 Nov;8(11):387–391. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(92)90300-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Workman J. L., Buchman A. R. Multiple functions of nucleosomes and regulatory factors in transcription. Trends Biochem Sci. 1993 Mar;18(3):90–95. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(93)90160-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Workman J. L., Kingston R. E. Nucleosome core displacement in vitro via a metastable transcription factor-nucleosome complex. Science. 1992 Dec 11;258(5089):1780–1784. doi: 10.1126/science.1465613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Workman J. L., Taylor I. C., Kingston R. E. Activation domains of stably bound GAL4 derivatives alleviate repression of promoters by nucleosomes. Cell. 1991 Feb 8;64(3):533–544. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90237-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Yoshida K., Ogawa N., Oshima Y. Function of the PHO regulatory genes for repressible acid phosphatase synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet. 1989 May;217(1):40–46. doi: 10.1007/BF00330940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES