Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Entomol. 2014 Jan;51(1):278–282. doi: 10.1603/me12273

Detection of Lyme Borrelia in Questing Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) and Small Mammals in Louisiana

BRIAN F LEYDET Jr 1,1, FANG-TING LIANG 1
PMCID: PMC3955005  NIHMSID: NIHMS554912  PMID: 24605479

Abstract

Lyme borreliosis is caused by spirochetes from the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato species complex. In the United States, B. burgdorferi sensu stricto (s.s.; Johnson, Schmid, Hyde, Steigerwalt, and Brenner) is the most common cause of human Lyme borreliosis. With >25,000 cases reported annually, it is the most common vector-borne disease in the United States. Although approximately 90% of cases are contained to the northeastern and Great Lake states, areas in Canada and some southern states are reporting rises in the number of human disease cases. Louisiana records a few cases of Lyme each year. Although some are most certainly the result of travel to more endemic areas, there exists evidence of locally acquired cases. Louisiana has established populations of the vector tick, Ixodes scapularis (Say), and a wide variety of potential reservoir animals, yet Lyme Borrelia has never been described in the state. Using culture and polymerase chain reaction, we investigated the presence of Lyme Borrelia in both mammals and questing ticks at a study site in Louisiana. Although culture was mostly unsuccessful, we did detect the presence of B. burgdorferi s.s. DNA in 6.3% (11 of 174) of ticks and 22.7% (five of 22) of animal samples. To our knowledge, this is among the first evidence documenting B. burgdorferi s.s. in Louisiana. Further investigations are required to determine the significance these findings have on human and animal health.

Keywords: Lyme disease, Borrelia, tick, LA, small mammal


With >25,000 human cases reported annually, Lyme borreliosis is the most common vector-borne disease in the United States (Bacon et al. 2008). It is caused by spirochetes from the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (s.l.) species complex (collectively referred to as Lyme Borrelia). In the United States, B. burgdorferi sensu stricto is the most common Lyme Borrelia spirochete implicated in human disease, its main vectors being Ixodes scapularis (Say) and Ixodes pacificus (Cooley and Khols) (Radolf et al. 2012). The nymphal life stage of these ticks is overwhelmingly responsible for the majority of reported human cases (Barbour and Fish 1993). Lyme borreliosis is a zoonotic disease, and humans are considered dead-end hosts; therefore, reservoir hosts like mice, chipmunks, and shrews are essential in perpetuating the spirochetes’ enzootic transmission cycle (Fish 1995).

Although the majority of Lyme borreliosis cases occur in northeastern and Great Lakes states (Bacon et al. 2008), areas not historically considered Lyme endemic are starting to report more cases. For example, researchers in Canada have mapped the encroachment of I. scapularis and subsequently Lyme Borrelia spirochetes over the past two decades (Ogden et al. 2006, 2010). On the southern side of this expansion, states like Virginia are becoming Lyme “hotspots,” with a reported 1,300% increase in cases from 1997 to 2007 (Anonymous 2011a, Levi et al. 2012). Louisiana reported 133 cases of Lyme borreliosis from 1998 to 2011; however, for many of these cases, it is impossible to determine whether the patient had actually acquired the infection in Louisiana or from travel to more Lyme-endemic areas (Anonymous 2011b). In 2012, a young child was diagnosed with Lyme borreliosis by physicians associated with Tulane Medical Center. This case met the Centers for Disease Control’s surveillance definition and had no history of travel outside the state (Black 2012; B. F. Leydet, personal communication). Like most other states in the southern United States, the lower incidence of Lyme borreliosis in Louisiana is likely multifactorial. Although Lyme Borrelia spirochetes are endemic to many states in the South, differences from the traditional northeastern Lyme Borrelia ecology probably play a significant role in human exposure and disease diagnosis. For example, host diversity in the South is higher, leading to more refractory hosts and changes in the vector’s ecology; multiple complex cryptic Lyme Borrelia cycles involving nonhuman biting ticks exist; and the population and overlap of Amblyomma americanum (L.), the vector of southern tick–associated rash illness, further complicate the situation (LoGiudice et al. 2003, Oliver et al. 2003, Goddard and Piesman 2006, Pepin et al. 2012). These reasons among others likely play an integral role in the lower infection prevalence and significantly reduced human encounters with nymphal I. scapularis across the southern United States (Felz et al. 1996, Oliver 1996).

The spread of Lyme borreliosis highlights the importance of surveillance in areas once considered low risk. Surprisingly, even with established state-wide populations of I. scapularis (Mackay and Foil 2005), a plethora of potential reservoir hosts (Lowery and Life 1974), and evidence that Louisiana populations of I. scapularis are competent vectors of B. burgdorferi (Jacobs et al. 2003), almost nothing exists in the literature regarding the presence of Lyme Borrelia in Louisiana. Therefore, this study investigated the presence of Lyme Borrelia in ticks and mammals at a site in Louisiana.

Materials and Methods

The study area chosen was Tunica Hills Wildlife Management Area in West Feliciana Parish, LA. Forest cover was categorized as upland hardwood rolling bluff land, which supports a large population of animals, including species of small rodents, birds, wild turkey, and white-tailed deer. Questing ticks were collected by flagging with 1-m2 white felt cloth flags along defined hiking paths and animal trails. Flagging was conducted once or twice a week for 2–3 h throughout the year (2009–2010), but only I. scapularis populations were used in this study. Animal trapping was conducted when I. scapularis nymphs were expected to be feeding on hosts (from spring to early fall in 2010). Animals were trapped using Tomahawk live traps (Tomahawk Live Trap Co., Tomahawk, WI) placed along animal tracks and trails. In total, 33 traps were set at night at least once a week during the aforementioned trapping period. This resulted in 1,056 trap nights. Captured animals were anesthetized with a combination of ketamine and dexmedetomidine, measured, weighed, and sexed. Ectoparasites were removed and placed in tubes alive for later processing and identification by using a standard key (Diamant and Strickland 1965). Two 2-mm ear-punch biopsies (EPB) were taken, and blood was drawn for culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. Animals were released at capture site after recovery from anesthesia. Borrelia culture isolation attempts were performed on blood, EPB, and questing ticks in BSK-H complete media (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) supplemented with rifampin (50 μg/ml), phosphomycin (50 μg/ml), and amphotericin B (2.5 μg/ml) as described previously (Barbour 1984, Sinsky and Piesman 1989). An indirect immunofluorescence assay was performed on cultures with evidence of spirochete growth by using monoclonal antibodies specific for B. burgdorferi (H5332) as described previously (Barbour et al. 1983). DNA extractions were performed on 2-mm EPBs from small mammals and half of each adult blacklegged tick (I. scapularis) by using the GeneElute Genomic DNA Miniprep kit (Sigma). EPBs and tick halves were minced using single-use sterile scalpels, and DNA was extracted as directed by the manufacturer. PCR and thermocycling were performed with a nested primer set targeting a 389-bp portion of the chromosomally located flaB gene as described previously (Clark et al. 2005). Borrelia flaB PCR has been successful in the sensitive detection and delineation of B. burgdorferi s.l. species by sequence analysis of PCR products, from both field and culture samples (Wodecka et al. 2010, Wodecka 2011, Yang et al. 2012). Environmental controls used for detection of DNA contamination in all experiments included simultaneous extraction tubes with no tissue added for all DNA extractions, and molecular biology– grade water used as a negative template in all downstream PCRs. PCR products were visualized by electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. PCR products were purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) following manufacturer’s instructions. PCR products were bidirectionally sequenced by the GeneLab division of the BioMMED core facility at Louisiana State University’s School of Veterinary Medicine. Sequences were aligned using CustalX and compared with existing sequences in the National Center for Biotechnology Information Genebank using the Basic Local Alignment Tool (Altschul et al. 1990, Thompson et al. 1997). In all aforementioned testing, appropriate positive controls included a culture of clonal B. burgdorferi B31 (5A11) and extracted genomic DNA from the culture. Negative controls as described previously in the text repeatedly showed no evidence of contamination throughout this study.

Results

In total, 174 adult blacklegged ticks (I. scapularis), 7 mice (Peromyscus spp.), 6 eastern woodrats (Neotoma floridana Ord), 4 raccoons [Procyon lotor (L.)], 4 eastern gray squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis Gmelin), and 1 North American opossum (Didelphis virginiana Kerr) were screened by PCR and culture for evidence of Lyme Borrelia. PCR testing of ticks produced 11 (6.3%) Borrelia sequences. Five (22.7%) of the animals had PCR-positive EPBs; this included two mice (28.6%), a woodrat (16.7%), a raccoon (25%), and a squirrel (25%). No I. scapularis nymphs were collected from trapped animals. The 11 positive questing I.scapularis had identical sequences (Table 1). Animal sequences shared some similarity with the ticks in one polymorphic site; however, other single nucleotide polymorphisms differed among samples. All sequences generated in this study had nucleotide differences from B. burgdorferi strain B31, yet were 99% homologous when aligned (Table 1). One tick and one squirrel sample produced spirochetes in primary culture isolates; however, on multiple passages, the samples were lost to bacterial contamination. Aliquots of these cultures were subjected to immunofluorescence assay, in which they reacted to B. burgdorferi–specific OspA H5332 antibodies. These two cultures were also positive by PCR and had identical sequences to their respective tick half and EPB, which were subjected only to PCR as described previously.

Table 1.

B. burgdorferi flaB sequences amplified from mammalian and tick gDNA samples in this study

Organism sampled Common name Homology to B. burgdorferi B31 (NC_001318.1) Nucleotide differences from B31 (base pair site of polymorphism)
N. floridana Woodrat 99% T→C (738)
P. lotor Raccoon 99% T→C (738)
Peromyscus spp. Field mouse 99% T→C (51); T→A (687) and T→C (738)
Peromyscus spp. Field mouse 99% T→C (738)
S. carolinesis Gray squirrel 99% T→C (510); T→A (687) and T→C (738)
I. scapularis (questing) Blacklegged tick 99% T→C (738)

Sequence results aligned to the full (1,011 base pairs) flaB portion of the B31 chromosome (positions 147649–148659).

Discussion

Since 1998, Louisiana has recorded 133 cases of human Lyme borreliosis (Anonymous 2011b). Although a proportion of these certainly are acquired from travel to more Lyme-endemic parts of the country, there is evidence for locally acquired cases. The enzootic cycle of B. burgdorferi has been well studied in areas of the Northeast, yet many states in the South continue to be understudied. Large-scale U.S. surveys have concluded that the prevalence of infected I. scapularis nymphs in the South is minuscule. However, these conclusions were based on very low numbers of ticks (Pepin et al. 2012), and in Louisiana, almost no work has been conducted investigating the presence of Lyme Borrelia. Conversely, tick surveys across other southern states have identified B. burg-dorferi infection in many populations of I. scapularis (Levine et al. 1991, Luckhart et al. 1991, Teltow et al. 1991, Rawlings and Teltow 1994, Sonenshine et al. 1995, Oliver et al. 2000, Clark et al. 2002, Clark 2004, Fryxell et al. 2012). In addition to natural cycles of B. burgdorferi involving I. scapularis, cryptic cycles of Lyme Borrelia have been documented in southern states, involving Ixodes affinis (Neumann), Ixodes minor (Neumann), and Ixodes dentatus (Neumann) transmitting multiple B. burgdorferi s.l. species (Oliver et al. 2003, Maggi et al. 2010). Competent reservoir animals dispersed across the southern United States have been shown to be infected with multiple species of Lyme Borrelia (Sonenshine et al. 1995, Oliver et al. 2003). Several ecological surveys conducted in southern states have led to the discovery of new Lyme Borrelia species, vectors, and reservoirs that have expanded our understanding of Lyme Borrelia ecology (Clark et al. 2002, Clark 2004, Lin et al. 2004).

Along with a recent survey of ticks collected off black bears in Louisiana (Leydet and Liang 2013), these are the first records of B. burgdorferi in Louisiana ticks and wildlife. This discovery, although novel, was not unexpected. Like other southern states, the prevalence of B. burgdorferi in Louisiana ticks at our study site is lower (6.3%) than the more endemic areas in the Northeast, where prevalence rates can be as high as 30 –50% (Adelson et al. 2004, Schulze et al. 2006, Pepin et al. 2012). The lack of nymphal I. scapularis collected from animals and by flagging during this study is also consistent with reports from states across the southern United States (Diuk-Wasser et al. 2006). The decreased success in cultivating Borrelia from ticks and mammals in this study is a phenomenon seen in other studies outside areas of higher endemicity. Could this be due to a lower detection sensitivity of culture versus molecular methods (Xu et al. 2013)? Or are Lyme Borrelia spirochetes in the South less likely to grow in traditional media (Clark 2004)? Although this remains unknown, further studies are warranted.

Because Louisiana consistently reports cases of human Lyme borreliosis each year, the detection of B. burgdorferi DNA in both vector ticks and competent reservoir hosts is significant. I. scapularis nymphs are the main vector for B. burgdorferi in the eastern United States, and although not detected in this study, can be found questing and attached to humans in Louisiana (B.F.L., unpublished data). It is also important to note that DNA evidence of bacteria does not confirm viability of the organism, and because cultures in this study were mostly unsuccessful, caution must be taken in the interpretation of these results. Still, molecular surveys demonstrating presence of a pathogen in known vectors and reservoirs are the critical first steps in our understanding of vector-borne disease agents in different geographical areas. More importantly, studies like this ultimately help relay new information to researchers and healthcare providers, who, in turn, help educate the public. Evidence from this study should prompt further state-wide surveys investigating the prevalence of Lyme Borrelia in Louisiana ticks and wildlife.

Acknowledgments

Brian Leydet, Jr. is a recipient of a Louisiana Board of Regent’s Fellowship. This work was in part supported by the National Institutes of Health (AI077733). The collection of ticks and sampling of animals were done under Protocol 10-047 approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Louisiana State University and Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Scientific Permit LNHP-10-075.

References Cited

  1. Adelson ME, Rao RV, Tilton RC, Cabets K, Eskow E, Fein L, Occi JL, Mordechai E. Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi, Bartonella spp., Babesia microti, and Anaplasma phagocytophilainIxodes scapularis ticks collected in Northern New Jersey. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:2799–2801. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.6.2799-2801.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anonymous. Ten year trend in number of reported cases of notifiable diseases, Virginia, 2002–2011. Virginia Department of Health, VA; 2011a. [Google Scholar]
  4. Anonymous. Lyme annual report. Louisiana Office of Public Health, Infectious Disease section; New Orleans, LA: 2011b. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bacon RM, Kugeler KJ, Mead PS. Surveillance for Lyme disease–United States, 1992–2006. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2008;57:1–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barbour AG. Isolation and cultivation of Lyme disease spirochetes. Yale J Biol Med. 1984;57:521–525. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barbour AG, Fish D. The biological and social phenomenon of Lyme disease. Science. 1993;260:1610–1616. doi: 10.1126/science.8503006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Barbour AG, Tessier SL, Todd WJ. Lyme disease spirochetes and ixodid tick spirochetes share a common surface antigenic determinant defined by a monoclonal antibody. Infect Immun. 1983;41:795–804. doi: 10.1128/iai.41.2.795-804.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Clark K. Borrelia species in host-seeking ticks and small mammals in northern Florida. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:5076–5086. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.11.5076-5086.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Clark K, Hendricks A, Burge D. Molecular identification and analysis of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in lizards in the southeastern United States. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:2616–2625. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.5.2616-2625.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Clark KL, Oliver JH, Jr, James AM, Durden LA, Banks CW. Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato infection among rodents and host-seeking ticks in South Carolina. J Med Entomol. 2002;39:198–206. doi: 10.1603/0022-2585-39.1.198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Diamant G, Strickland RK. Manual on livestock ticks for Animal Disease Eradication Division personnel. USDA ARS 91–49; 1965. [Google Scholar]
  13. Diuk-Wasser MA, Gatewood AG, Cortinas MR, Yaremych-Hamer S, Tsao J, Kitron U, Hickling G, Brownstein JS, Walker E, Piesman J, et al. Spatiotemporal patterns of host-seeking Ixodes scapularis nymphs (Acari: Ixodidae) in the United States. J Med Entomol. 2006;43:166–176. doi: 10.1603/0022-2585(2006)043[0166:spohis]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Felz MW, Durden LA, Oliver JH., Jr Ticks parasitizing humans in Georgia and South Carolina. J Parasitol. 1996;82:505–508. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fish D. Environmental risk and prevention of Lyme disease. Am J Med. 1995;98:2S–8S. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)80038-2. discussion 8S–9S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fryxell RT, Steelman CD, Szalanski AL, Kvamme KL, Billingsley PM, Williamson PC. Survey of Borreliae in ticks, canines, and white-tailed deer from Arkansas, U.S.A. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:139. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-5-139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Goddard J, Piesman J. New records of immature Ixodes scapularis from Mississippi. J Vector Ecol. 2006;31:421–422. doi: 10.3376/1081-1710(2006)31[421:nroiis]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jacobs MB, Purcell JE, Philipp MT. Ixodes scapularis ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) from Louisiana are competent to transmit Borrelia burgdorferi, the agent of Lyme borreliosis. J Med Entomol. 2003;40:964–967. doi: 10.1603/0022-2585-40.6.964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Levi T, Kilpatrick AM, Mangel M, Wilmers CC. Deer, predators, and the emergence of Lyme disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:10942–10947. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1204536109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Levine JF, Sonenshine DE, Nicholson WL, Turner RT. Borrelia burgdorferi in ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) from coastal Virginia. J Med Entomol. 1991;28:668– 674. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/28.5.668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Leydet BF, Jr, Liang FT. Detection of human bacterial pathogens in ticks collected from Louisiana black bears (Ursus americanus luteolus) Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2013;4:191–196. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2012.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lin T, Oliver JH, Jr, Gao L. Molecular characterization of Borrelia isolates from ticks and mammals from the southern United States. J Parasitol. 2004;90:1298– 1307. doi: 10.1645/GE-195R1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. LoGiudice K, Ostfeld RS, Schmidt KA, Keesing F. The ecology of infectious disease: effects of host diversity and community composition on Lyme disease risk. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:567–571. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0233733100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lowery GH, Life LW. The mammals of Louisiana and its adjacent waters. Louisiana State University Press; Baton Rouge, LA: 1974. [Google Scholar]
  25. Luckhart S, Mullen GR, Wright JC. Etiologic agent of Lyme disease, Borrelia burgdorferi, detected in ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) collected at a focus in Alabama. J Med Entomol. 1991;28:652–657. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/28.5.652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mackay A, Foil L. Seasonal and geographical distribution of adult Ixodes scapularis say (Acari: Ixodidae) in Louisiana. J Vector Ecol. 2005;30:168–170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Maggi RG, Reichelt S, Toliver M, Engber B. Borrelia species in Ixodesaffinis and Ixodesscapularis ticks collected from the coastal plain of North Carolina. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2010;1:168–171. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2010.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ogden NH, Trudel L, Artsob H, Barker IK, Beau-champ G, Charron DF, Drebot MA, Galloway TD, O’Handley R, Thompson RA, et al. Ixodes scapularis ticks collected by passive surveillance in Canada: analysis of geographic distribution and infection with Lyme borreliosis agent Borrelia burgdorferi. J Med Entomol. 2006;43:600– 609. doi: 10.1603/0022-2585(2006)43[600:ISTCBP]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ogden NH, Bouchard C, Kurtenbach K, Margos G, Lindsay LR, Trudel L, Nguon S, Milord F. Active and passive surveillance and phylogenetic analysis of Borrelia burgdorferi elucidate the process of Lyme disease risk emergence in Canada. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118:909–914. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Oliver JH., Jr Lyme borreliosis in the southern United States: a review. J Parasitol. 1996;82:926–935. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Oliver JH, Jr, Clark KL, Chandler FW, Jr, Tao L, James AM, Banks CW, Huey LO, Banks AR, Williams DC, Durden LA. Isolation, cultivation, and characterization of Borrelia burgdorferi from rodents and ticks in the Charleston area of South Carolina. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:120–124. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.1.120-124.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Oliver JH, Jr, Lin T, Gao L, Clark KL, Banks CW, Durden LA, James AM, Chandler FW., Jr An enzootic transmission cycle of Lyme borreliosis spirochetes in the southeastern United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:11642–11645. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1434553100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Pepin KM, Eisen RJ, Mead PS, Piesman J, Fish D, Hoen AG, Barbour AG, Hamer S, Diuk-Wasser MA. Geographic variation in the relationship between human Lyme disease incidence and density of infected host-seeking Ixodes scapularis nymphs in the eastern United States. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;86:1062–1071. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Radolf JD, Caimano MJ, Stevenson B, Hu LT. Of ticks, mice and men: understanding the dual-host lifestyle of Lyme disease spirochaetes. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10:87–99. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rawlings JA, Teltow GJ. Prevalence of Borrelia (Spirochaetaceae) spirochetes in Texas ticks. J Med Entomol. 1994;31:297–301. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/31.2.297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Schulze TL, Jordan RA, Healy SP, Roegner VE, Meddis M, Jahn MB, Guthrie DL., Sr Relative abundance and prevalence of selected Borrelia infections in Ixodes scapularis and Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae) from publicly owned lands in Monmouth County, New Jersey. J Med Entomol. 2006;43:1269–1275. doi: 10.1603/0022-2585(2006)43[1269:raapos]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sinsky RJ, Piesman J. Ear punch biopsy method for detection and isolation of Borrelia burgdorferi from rodents. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27:1723–1727. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.8.1723-1727.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sonenshine DE, Ratzlaff RE, Troyer J, Demmerle S, Demmerle ER, Austin WE, Tan S, Annis BA, Jenkins S. Borrelia burgdorferi in eastern Virginia: comparison between a coastal and inland locality. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995;53:123–133. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1995.53.123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Teltow GJ, Fournier PV, Rawlings JA. Isolation of Borreliaburgdorferi from arthropods collected in Texas. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1991;44:469– 474. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1991.44.469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:4876– 4882. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wodecka B. flaB gene as a molecular marker for distinct identification of Borrelia species in environmental samples by the PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism method. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:7088–7092. doi: 10.1128/AEM.05437-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wodecka B, Leonska A, Skotarczak B. A comparative analysis of molecular markers for the detection and identification of Borrelia spirochaetes in Ixodes ricinus. J Med Microbiol. 2010;59:309–314. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.013508-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Xu G, Wesker J, White C, Campbell J, Reich NG, Rich SM. Detection and heterogeneity of Borrelia burgdorferi in Ixodes ticks by culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:615–617. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03009-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yang J, Liu Z, Guan G, Che R, Niu Q, Li Y, Liu J, Ma M, Ren Q, Liu A, et al. Evaluation of molecular methods for detection of Borrelia burgdorferi senso lato in ticks. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;73:80– 83. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES