Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1994 Dec 15;13(24):5984–5993. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06944.x

Sequences required for enhancer blocking activity of scs are located within two nuclease-hypersensitive regions.

J Vazquez 1, P Schedl 1
PMCID: PMC395574  PMID: 7813436

Abstract

The Drosophila 87A7 heat shock locus is bordered, on the proximal and distal sides, by two special chromatin structures, scs and scs'. Each structure is characterized by two sets of nuclease-hypersensitive sites, located within moderately G/C-rich DNA, flanking an A/T-rich nuclease-resistant region. scs and scs' have been shown to insulate a white reporter gene from position effects and to prevent enhancer-promoter interactions. These and other properties suggest scs and scs' might function as chromatin domain boundaries. To identify the DNA sequences which are essential for the insulating activity of scs we used an enhancer blocking assay based on the white gene. Sequences capable of suppressing activation of white by its upstream enhancer elements reside within a 900 bp DNA fragment corresponding to the scs chromatin structure. Within this region, DNA fragments associated with the two nuclease-hypersensitive regions are essential for full enhancer blocking activity, while the central A/T-rich region is dispensable. Deletions which remove part of the hypersensitive regions result in intermediate levels of white activity. Insulating activity can, however, be reconstituted by multimerizing DNA fragments from either hypersensitive region. Our results suggest that the scs boundary is assembled from a discrete number of functionally redundant DNA sequences located within both hypersensitive regions and that boundaries act by decreasing the frequency of enhancer-promoter interactions. We also show that certain types of position effects, like those involved in dosage compensation, are not efficiently blocked by scs.

Full text

PDF
5984

Images in this article

5986Image
on p.5986
5988Image
on p.5988
5989Image
on p.5989
5990Image
on p.5990
5991Image
on p.5991

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Benyajati C., Worcel A. Isolation, characterization, and structure of the folded interphase genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell. 1976 Nov;9(3):393–407. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90084-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bone J. R., Lavender J., Richman R., Palmer M. J., Turner B. M., Kuroda M. I. Acetylated histone H4 on the male X chromosome is associated with dosage compensation in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 1994 Jan;8(1):96–104. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.1.96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brennan M. D., Weiner A. J., Goralski T. J., Mahowald A. P. The follicle cells are a major site of vitellogenin synthesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol. 1982 Jan;89(1):225–236. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(82)90309-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chung J. H., Whiteley M., Felsenfeld G. A 5' element of the chicken beta-globin domain serves as an insulator in human erythroid cells and protects against position effect in Drosophila. Cell. 1993 Aug 13;74(3):505–514. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)80052-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Davison D., Chapman C. H., Wedeen C., Bingham P. M. Genetic and physical studies of a portion of the white locus participating in transcriptional regulation and in synapsis-dependent interactions in Drosophila adult tissues. Genetics. 1985 Jul;110(3):479–494. doi: 10.1093/genetics/110.3.479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dorsett D. Distance-independent inactivation of an enhancer by the suppressor of Hairy-wing DNA-binding protein of Drosophila. Genetics. 1993 Aug;134(4):1135–1144. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.4.1135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Farkas G., Udvardy A. Sequence of scs and scs' Drosophila DNA fragments with boundary function in the control of gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 May 25;20(10):2604–2604. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.10.2604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fjose A., Polito L. C., Weber U., Gehring W. J. Developmental expression of the white locus of Drosophila melanogaster. EMBO J. 1984 Sep;3(9):2087–2094. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02095.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. GALL J. G., CALLAN H. G. H3 uridine incorporation in lampbrush chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1962 Apr 15;48:562–570. doi: 10.1073/pnas.48.4.562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. GALL J. G. On the submicroscopic structure of chromosomes. Brookhaven Symp Biol. 1956 Feb;(8):17–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Garabedian M. J., Hung M. C., Wensink P. C. Independent control elements that determine yolk protein gene expression in alternative Drosophila tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Mar;82(5):1396–1400. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.5.1396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Garabedian M. J., Shepherd B. M., Wensink P. C. A tissue-specific transcription enhancer from the Drosophila yolk protein 1 gene. Cell. 1986 Jun 20;45(6):859–867. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90560-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Geyer P. K., Corces V. G. DNA position-specific repression of transcription by a Drosophila zinc finger protein. Genes Dev. 1992 Oct;6(10):1865–1873. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.10.1865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Geyer P. K., Green M. M., Corces V. G. Mutant gene phenotypes mediated by a Drosophila melanogaster retrotransposon require sequences homologous to mammalian enhancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Nov;85(22):8593–8597. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.22.8593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Goldschmidt-Clermont M. Two genes for the major heat-shock protein of Drosophila melanogaster arranged as an inverted repeat. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980 Jan 25;8(2):235–252. doi: 10.1093/nar/8.2.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Han S., Udvardy A., Schedl P. Transcriptionally active chromatin is sensitive to Neurospora crassa and S1 nucleases. J Mol Biol. 1984 Nov 5;179(3):469–496. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90076-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hazelrigg T., Levis R., Rubin G. M. Transformation of white locus DNA in drosophila: dosage compensation, zeste interaction, and position effects. Cell. 1984 Feb;36(2):469–481. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90240-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Holdridge C., Dorsett D. Repression of hsp70 heat shock gene transcription by the suppressor of hairy-wing protein of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Apr;11(4):1894–1900. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.4.1894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ish-Horowicz D., Pinchin S. M., Schedl P., Artavanis-Tsakonas S., Mirault M. E. Genetic and molecular analysis of the 87A7 and 87C1 heat-inducible loci of D. melanogaster. Cell. 1979 Dec;18(4):1351–1358. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90245-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Judd B. H., Shen M. W., Kaufman T. C. The anatomy and function of a segment of the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1972 May;71(1):139–156. doi: 10.1093/genetics/71.1.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kellum R., Schedl P. A group of scs elements function as domain boundaries in an enhancer-blocking assay. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 May;12(5):2424–2431. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.5.2424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kellum R., Schedl P. A position-effect assay for boundaries of higher order chromosomal domains. Cell. 1991 Mar 8;64(5):941–950. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90318-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Klemenz R., Weber U., Gehring W. J. The white gene as a marker in a new P-element vector for gene transfer in Drosophila. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 May 26;15(10):3947–3959. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.10.3947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kuroda M. I., Kernan M. J., Kreber R., Ganetzky B., Baker B. S. The maleless protein associates with the X chromosome to regulate dosage compensation in Drosophila. Cell. 1991 Sep 6;66(5):935–947. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90439-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Levis R., Hazelrigg T., Rubin G. M. Separable cis-acting control elements for expression of the white gene of Drosophila. EMBO J. 1985 Dec 16;4(13A):3489–3499. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb04108.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu L. F., Wang J. C. Supercoiling of the DNA template during transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Oct;84(20):7024–7027. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.20.7024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. O'Hare K., Murphy C., Levis R., Rubin G. M. DNA sequence of the white locus of Drosophila melanogaster. J Mol Biol. 1984 Dec 15;180(3):437–455. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90021-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Peifer M., Bender W. Sequences of the gypsy transposon of Drosophila necessary for its effects on adjacent genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Dec;85(24):9650–9654. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.24.9650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pirrotta V., Steller H., Bozzetti M. P. Multiple upstream regulatory elements control the expression of the Drosophila white gene. EMBO J. 1985 Dec 16;4(13A):3501–3508. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb04109.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ptashne M. How eukaryotic transcriptional activators work. Nature. 1988 Oct 20;335(6192):683–689. doi: 10.1038/335683a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Reuter G., Spierer P. Position effect variegation and chromatin proteins. Bioessays. 1992 Sep;14(9):605–612. doi: 10.1002/bies.950140907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Roseman R. R., Pirrotta V., Geyer P. K. The su(Hw) protein insulates expression of the Drosophila melanogaster white gene from chromosomal position-effects. EMBO J. 1993 Feb;12(2):435–442. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05675.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Scholnick S. B., Morgan B. A., Hirsh J. The cloned dopa decarboxylase gene is developmentally regulated when reintegrated into the Drosophila genome. Cell. 1983 Aug;34(1):37–45. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90134-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Smith P. A., Corces V. G. The suppressor of Hairy-wing binding region is required for gypsy mutagenesis. Mol Gen Genet. 1992 May;233(1-2):65–70. doi: 10.1007/BF00587562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Southern E. M. Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol. 1975 Nov 5;98(3):503–517. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(75)80083-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Spradling A. C., Rubin G. M. The effect of chromosomal position on the expression of the Drosophila xanthine dehydrogenase gene. Cell. 1983 Aug;34(1):47–57. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90135-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Spradling A. C., Rubin G. M. Transposition of cloned P elements into Drosophila germ line chromosomes. Science. 1982 Oct 22;218(4570):341–347. doi: 10.1126/science.6289435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Steller H., Pirrotta V. Expression of the Drosophila white gene under the control of the hsp70 heat shock promoter. EMBO J. 1985 Dec 30;4(13B):3765–3772. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb04146.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Thomas G. H., Elgin S. C. Protein/DNA architecture of the DNase I hypersensitive region of the Drosophila hsp26 promoter. EMBO J. 1988 Jul;7(7):2191–2201. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03058.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tomlinson A., Kimmel B. E., Rubin G. M. rough, a Drosophila homeobox gene required in photoreceptors R2 and R5 for inductive interactions in the developing eye. Cell. 1988 Dec 2;55(5):771–784. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90133-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Tsao Y. P., Wu H. Y., Liu L. F. Transcription-driven supercoiling of DNA: direct biochemical evidence from in vitro studies. Cell. 1989 Jan 13;56(1):111–118. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90989-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Turner B. M., Birley A. J., Lavender J. Histone H4 isoforms acetylated at specific lysine residues define individual chromosomes and chromatin domains in Drosophila polytene nuclei. Cell. 1992 Apr 17;69(2):375–384. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90417-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Udvardy A., Schedl P. Chromatin organization of the 87A7 heat shock locus of Drosophila melanogaster. J Mol Biol. 1984 Feb 5;172(4):385–403. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(84)80013-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Udvardy A., Schedl P. The dynamics of chromatin condensation: redistribution of topoisomerase II in the 87A7 heat shock locus during induction and recovery. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Dec;13(12):7522–7530. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.12.7522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Vazquez J., Farkas G., Gaszner M., Udvardy A., Muller M., Hagstrom K., Gyurkovics H., Sipos L., Gausz J., Galloni M. Genetic and molecular analysis of chromatin domains. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1993;58:45–54. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1993.058.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wu H. Y., Shyy S. H., Wang J. C., Liu L. F. Transcription generates positively and negatively supercoiled domains in the template. Cell. 1988 May 6;53(3):433–440. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90163-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES