The Supporting Figures are currently provided as CDR files and the Supporting Tables and Protocol are provided as WPD documents. For any readers unable to access these files types, the authors have provided PDF files of all Supporting Information files.
Supporting Information
Quantifying Potential Bias in the Magnitude of Selection Gradients Caused by Pseudoreplication. Mean sexual selection gradients on eight logcontrast male CHCs from three geographic populations are presented. For each population, mean selection gradients were estimated from 1,000 bootstrap replicates each of two subpopulations composed of 128 males (64 chosen, 64 rejected) randomly sampled from the population of 256 males. In subpopulation A, 64 trials were randomly selected, and both the chosen and rejected males were used. In subpopulation B, a single male (chosen or rejected) was sampled from each of the 128 trials. The line is a one-to-one line.
doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030368.sg001
Quantifying Potential Bias in the Significance Level of Selection Gradients Caused by Pseudoreplication. Mean significance levels for the sexual selection gradients on eight logcontrast male CHCs from three geographic populations estimated from 1,000 bootstrap replicates of subpopulations A and B as described in Figure S1. The line is a one-to-one line.
doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030368.sg002
Standardized Linear and Nonlinear Sexual Selection Gradients on the Eight Male CHCs for Each of the 12 Populations.
doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030368.st001
Media Recipes for the Three Treatment Environments.
doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030368.st002
Pseudoreplication and Multiple-Choice Mating Trials.
doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030368.sd001
Reference
- 1. Rundle HD, Chenoweth SF, Doughty P, Blows MW (2005) Divergent Selection and the Evolution of Signal Traits and Mating Preferences. PLoS Biol 3(11): e368 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Quantifying Potential Bias in the Magnitude of Selection Gradients Caused by Pseudoreplication. Mean sexual selection gradients on eight logcontrast male CHCs from three geographic populations are presented. For each population, mean selection gradients were estimated from 1,000 bootstrap replicates each of two subpopulations composed of 128 males (64 chosen, 64 rejected) randomly sampled from the population of 256 males. In subpopulation A, 64 trials were randomly selected, and both the chosen and rejected males were used. In subpopulation B, a single male (chosen or rejected) was sampled from each of the 128 trials. The line is a one-to-one line.
doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030368.sg001
Quantifying Potential Bias in the Significance Level of Selection Gradients Caused by Pseudoreplication. Mean significance levels for the sexual selection gradients on eight logcontrast male CHCs from three geographic populations estimated from 1,000 bootstrap replicates of subpopulations A and B as described in Figure S1. The line is a one-to-one line.
doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030368.sg002
Standardized Linear and Nonlinear Sexual Selection Gradients on the Eight Male CHCs for Each of the 12 Populations.
doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030368.st001
Media Recipes for the Three Treatment Environments.
doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030368.st002
Pseudoreplication and Multiple-Choice Mating Trials.
doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030368.sd001