Abstract
The prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV)–associated head and neck cancers is increasing, but the prevalence of oral HPV infection in the wider community remains unknown. We sought to determine the prevalence of, and identify risk factors for, oral HPV infection in a sample of young, healthy Australians. For this study, we recruited 307 Australian university students (18–35 years). Participants reported anonymously about basic characteristics, sexual behaviour, and alcohol, tobacco and illicit drugs use. We collected oral rinse samples from all participants for HPV testing and typing. Seven of 307 (2.3%) students tested positive for oral HPV infection (3 HPV-18, one each of HPV-16, -67, -69, -90), and six of them were males (p = 0.008). Compared to HPV negative students, those with oral HPV infection were more likely to have received oral sex from more partners in their lifetime (p = 0.0004) and in the last year (p = 0.008). We found no statistically significant associations with alcohol consumption, smoking or numbers of partners for passionate kissing or sexual intercourse. In conclusion, oral HPV infection was associated with male gender and receiving oral sex in our sample of young Australians.
Introduction
The incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC), more specifically of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), is increasing. Sites particularly affected are those of the tonsils and base of tongue [1]–[3]. While previously most of these cancers could be attributed to tobacco and alcohol, it appears that recently fewer patients have been presenting with these classical risk factors. During the last decade there has been a sizeable increase in the numbers of OPSCCs associated with human papillomavirus (HPV), and these patients are more often non-smokers, and often somewhat younger than those with HPV negative OPSCC [2]–[7]. This is believed to reflect an increasing prevalence of oral HPV infections due to changing sexual practices [4], [5]. HPV-16 is the most common high-risk HPV type identified in oral samples from the general population as well as in HNSCC tumours [5], [8]–[10]. Oral HPV infection has been strongly implicated as being responsible for the increase in HNSCC and is the likely causative factor of the increasing subset of HNSCC among young non-smokers, but very little is known about the epidemiology of oral HPV infections. Previous studies have shown varying oral α-HPV prevalence in different populations, ranging from 0.6% (4/662) in a Japanese study of a sample of the population of Miyako Island up to 25% (29/117) in an American study of older men [10]–[14]. The largest study to date reported an overall oral HPV prevalence of 6.9% among 5,579 men and women, aged 14 to 69 years in the United States [10]. The prevalence of oral infection in the general population of Australia remains unknown. We analysed α-HPV DNA prevalence and HPV types together with life-style factors and sexual behaviour in a sample of young, healthy Australians, and herewith report the findings.
Materials and Methods
Study population and samples
We recruited 307 students (ages 18 to 35 yrs) from an Australian university. Students were informed about our study by emailing flyers, posting on social media through student organisations and providing information in lectures. Students were approached after lectures as well as at campus where our data collection room was set up. Participants were asked to self-complete a paper-based 4-page questionnaire. Potential participants were informed that the investigators would not record any identifying details, and that their anonymity would be preserved. Students who agreed to participate were given a questionnaire and a tube for collection of oral rinse sample, both labelled with the same unique identification number. The questionnaire covered basic demographics (age, gender, education etc), sexual behaviour (passionate kissing, giving and receiving oral sex, and sexual intercourse, numbers of partners, recency of various sexual activities and sexual orientation), and alcohol, tobacco and illicit drugs use as well as history of genital infections, abnormal pap smears and Gardasil vaccination (the quadrivalent HPV vaccine that protects against HPV types HPV-6, -11, -16 and -18 and for which Australia launched a national program in 2007). It also included two questions about knowledge of protection from contracting a sexually transmitted infection from engaging in oral sex. In the questionnaire we included the following descriptions: ‘one drink’ = a glass of wine, middy of beer or nip of spirits; ‘Non-smoker’ - You have smoked 100 or fewer cigarettes in your life-time; An ‘illicit drug’ refers to illegal or controlled substances; ‘Recreational drug’ refers to drugs used for non-medical purposes, not including cigarettes or alcohol; ‘Passionate kissing’ refers to open-mouthed kissing; ‘Oral sex’ refers to a man's or woman's mouth on a partner's genital area; ‘Sexual intercourse’ refers to vaginal intercourse and anal intercourse only and does not refer to oral sex; and ‘Mouth jewellery’ refers to jewellery worn on the lips or tongue requiring piercing of the skin.
Participants rinsed their mouth with 7 ml sterile saline (0.9%) for 30 seconds. All oral rinse specimens were frozen at −20°C within 3 hours of collection. Specimens were later thawed at ambient room temperature, vortexed and 3 ml was used for DNA extraction. DNA was extracted in batches of 24 samples at a time, using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit following the QIAGEN supplementary protocol for Isolation of genomic DNA from saliva and mouthwash (QA19v Jul-10).
Ethics Statement
All participants were given a copy of the Study Information Sheet; consent was obtained by completing the anonymous questionnaire. The study was approved by the human research ethics committees of the Queensland University of Technology (1200000292) and the QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (P1508).
HPV DNA analysis
The DNA samples extracted from the participants' oral rinse specimens were analysed by PCR for the presence of HPV with the general mucosal HPV primer GP5+/GP6+ [15]. β-globin PCR with the primers PCO3 and PCO4 [16] was carried out on all samples to ensure that no PCR inhibiting agents were present and that they contained human DNA. The final volume of PCR solution (25 μl) contained 5 μl of extracted sample DNA, 0.5 μM of the GP5+ and GP6+ primers or PCO3 and PCO4 primers (Sigma-Aldrich), dNTPs at concentrations of 0.2 mM each (Roche), 1 U of AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase, 1× PCR Gold buffer and 2.0 mM MgCl2 (Applied Biosystems). Forty cycles of amplification was performed on an Eppendorf Mastercycler Gradient PCR machine after an initial step of 10 minutes denaturation at 94°C. Each cycle for the GP+ PCR consisted of 94°C for 1 min, 40°C for 2 min and 72°C for 1.5 min, plus a final elongation step at 72°C for 4 min. Each amplification cycle for the β-globin PCR consisted of 94°C for 1.5 min, 50°C for 1.5 min and 72°C for 1.5 min, plus a final elongation step at 72°C for 4 min. In each batch of tests, H2O was used as a negative control. HeLa cells (HPV-18 positive cervical cell line) were used as a positive control in both PCR reactions. PCR amplicons were analysed by electrophoresis (1.5% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide; SeaKem, FMC bioproducts and Sigma) and identified under UV light. To minimize the risk for contamination we used different pipettes and rooms for DNA extraction, preparing the PCR solution, adding DNA samples to PCR solution and electrophoresis analysis.
HPV Type Determination
The HPV positive PCR products were purified with the Agencourt® AMPure PCR purification kit (Agencourt Bioscience) in a magnetic 96-ring SPRIplate®. The sequencing reaction contained the purified PCR products together with 3.25 μM of primer and BigDye Terminator (Applied Biosystems). The sequencing reaction was performed in an Eppendorf Mastercycler Gradient PCR machine. After an initial step of 96°C for 2 min, 20 cycles followed, each with 96°C for 10 s, 50°C for 5 s and 60°C for 2 minutes. The sequence reactions were purified with the Agencourt® CleanSEQ dye-terminator removal kit (Agencourt Bioscience) in a magnetic 96-ring SPRIplate®, and purified sequence reactions were analysed with an automated DNA sequencer (ABI model 3100). The DNA sequences obtained were compared with available sequences in GenBank through the BLAST server (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).
Statistical Analysis
We conducted a sample size calculation for this study, and concluded that a sample of 300 would be sufficient to detect a prevalence of 5% with 80% power (expected to observe 15 events, and would have 95% confidence that the true population prevalence would be between 2.5 and 7.5%).
We compared HPV positive with HPV negative individuals to identify characteristics associated with HPV positivity. For comparisons, we used the t-test for normally distributed continuous variables and for categorical variables we used the χ2 test (or Fischer's exact test when the expected number in any cell was <5). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained using logistic regression models. For some exposures, categories were combined to permit effects to be estimated. All significance tests were two-sided tests at α = 0.05. We used SAS (version 9.2) for all analyses.
Results
Characteristics of the study population
The mean age of the 307 participants was 22.0 years (range 18–35) and 62% were female. The majority of students (90%; n = 275) had had some type of sexual contact (including passionate kissing, oral sex and sexual intercourse) in their lifetime. Of the students who reported prior sexual activity, 82% (n = 225) had engaged in oral sex, and 78% (n = 214) had had sexual intercourse. Thirty-two percent of the participants (n = 98, 95 females, 3 males) had received at least one dose of the Gardasil® vaccine. Table 1 presents characteristics of the study population in detail.
Table 1. Selected characteristics of the 307 participants.
| Characteristics | N (%) | |
| Gender | Male | 116 (37.8%) |
| Female | 191 (62.2%) | |
| Age | 18–19 yrs | 98 (31.9%) |
| 20–21 | 80 (26.1%) | |
| 22–24 | 66 (21.5%) | |
| 25–35 | 63 (20.5%) | |
| Born in Australia | No | 83 (27.0%) |
| Yes | 224 (73.0%) | |
| Number of alcoholic drinks per week | Less than 1 | 162 (52.8%) |
| 2 or more | 145 (47.2%) | |
| Smoking status | Current | 19 (6.2%) |
| Former | 34 (11.1%) | |
| Non | 254 (82.7%) | |
| Illicit drug use in the last 12months | Never | 219 (71.3%) |
| Less than monthly | 65 (21.2%) | |
| More than monthly | 23 (7.5%) | |
| Ever had any type of sexual contact (including passionate kissing) | No | 31 (10.1%) |
| Yes | 276 (89.9%) | |
| Ever kissed another person passionately | No | 31 (10.1%) |
| Yes | 276 (89.9%) | |
| Ever engaged in oral sex | No | 51 (18.5%) |
| Yes | 224 (81.5%) | |
| Gender of oral sex partner | Same sex only | 20 (8.9%) |
| Opposite sex only | 193 (85.8%) | |
| Both sexes | 12 (5.3%) | |
| Ever given oral sex | No | 9 (4.0%) |
| Yes | 216 (96.0%) | |
| Use of condom when giving oral sex | Never | 182 (83.9%) |
| Seldom | 15 (6.9%) | |
| Occasionally | 16 (7.4%) | |
| Frequently | 2 (0.9%) | |
| Very frequently | 2 (0.9%) | |
| Ever received oral sex | No | 11 (4.9%) |
| Yes | 214 (95.1%) | |
| Ever had sexual intercourse | No | 62 (22.5%) |
| Yes | 214 (77.5%) | |
| Gender of sexual intercourse partners | Same sex only | 14 (6.5%) |
| Opposite sex only | 190 (88.4%) | |
| Both sexes | 11 (5.1%) | |
| Have you ever received the Gardasil vaccine | No | 199 (65.0%) |
| Yes | 98 (32.0%) | |
| Don't know | 9 (3.0%) |
HPV prevalence and HPV types
Seven of the 307 (prevalence 2.3%; 95% confidence interval 0.6–4.0%) students tested positive for oral HPV infection. All the positive samples had single HPV types detected. The most prevalent HPV type was HPV-18 which was identified in three of the seven oral HPV positive individuals (43%). HPV-16, -67, -69 and -90 were identified in one sample each. All samples tested positive for β-globin.
Characteristics and behaviour associated with oral HPV infection
Table 2 shows characteristics and behaviour for HPV positive and HPV negative individuals in detail. Six of the seven oral HPV positive individuals were males (p = 0.008). The mean age of the oral HPV positive group was 23.0 (SD 1.6) and 22.0 (SD 4.0) for the HPV negative. One of the seven oral HPV positive individuals reported to have kissed passionately, but had never engaged in oral sex or had sexual intercourse. Students with oral HPV infection reported having received oral sex from more partners in their lifetime (p = 0.0004) as well as in the past year (p = 0.008) compared to HPV negative subjects. Self-reported diagnosis of HIV was significantly associated with oral HPV infection (p = 0.023). The following factors were not statistically significantly associated with oral HPV infection in this sample: age, county of birth, language spoken at home, secondary school education, alcohol consumption, illicit drug use, smoking, tonsillectomy, braces, mouth jewellery, age at first passionate kiss, giving/receiving oral sex or sexual intercourse, number of partners for passionate kissing, giving oral sex and sexual intercourse, partners of same, opposite or mixed sex, previous history of genital chlamydia, gonorrhoea, HPV or herpes simplex, and use of condom or dental dam while giving or receiving oral sex. None of the oral HPV positive subjects reported having had an abnormal pap smear or had a partner with an abnormal pap smear. None of the seven students with oral HPV infection had been vaccinated with Gardasil®.
Table 2. Characteristics of HPV negative and HPV positive individuals.
| Characteristics | HPV- | HPV+ | Crude OR | ||
| N (%) | N (%) | (95% CI) | P value | ||
| Gender | Male | 110 (36.7%) | 6 (85.7%) | 1.00 (ref) | 0.008 |
| Female | 190 (63.3%) | 1 (14.3%) | 0.10 (0.01–0.81) | ||
| Age | 18–19 yrs | 96 (32.0%) | 2 (28.6%) | 1.00 (ref) | |
| 20–21 | 79 (26.3%) | 1 (14.3%) | 0.61 (0.05–6.82) | ||
| 22–24 | 65 (21.7%) | 1 (14.3%) | 0.74 (0.07–8.31) | ||
| 25–35 | 60 (20.0%) | 3 (42.9%) | 2.40 (0.39–14.78) | 0.508 | |
| Born in Australia | No | 80 (26.7%) | 3 (42.9%) | 1.00 (ref) | 0.340 |
| Yes | 220 (73.3%) | 4 (57.1%) | 0.48 (0.11–2.21) | ||
| Number of alcoholic drinks per week | Less than 1 | 159 (53.0%) | 3 (42.9%) | 1.00 (ref) | 0.595 |
| 2 or more | 141 (47.0%) | 4 (57.1%) | 1.50 (0.33–6.83) | ||
| Smoking status | Non | 250 (83.3%) | 4 (57.1%) | 1.00 (ref) | 0.191 |
| Current | 18 (6.0%) | 1 (14.3%) | 3.47 (0.37–32.71) | ||
| Former | 32 (10.7%) | 2 (28.6%) | 3.91 (0.69–22.18) | ||
| Illicit drug use in the last 12months | Never | 216 (72.0%) | 3 (42.9%) | 1.00 (ref) | 0.072 |
| Less than monthly | 63 (21.0%) | 2 (28.6%) | 2.29 (0.37–13.98) | ||
| More than monthly | 21 (7.0%) | 2 (28.6%) | 6.86 (0.37–13.98) | ||
| Ever had any type of sexual contact (including passionate kissing) | No | 31 (10.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | – | 0.370 |
| Yes | 269 (89.7%) | 7 (100%) | – | ||
| Number of kissing partners in a lifetime | 1 | 21 (7.9%) | 1 (14.3%) | 1.00 (ref) | 0.504 |
| 2–3 | 55 (20.6%) | 1 (14.3%) | 0.38 (0.02–6.39) | ||
| 4–7 | 59 (22.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | – | ||
| 8–15 | 52 (19.5%) | 1 (14.3%) | 0.40 (0.02–6.76) | ||
| 16–28 | 31 (11.6%) | 1 (14.3%) | 0.68 (0.04–11.44) | ||
| 29 or more | 49 (18.4%) | 3 (42.9%) | 1.29 (0.13–13.09) | ||
| Ever engaged in oral sex | No | 50 (18.7%) | 1 (14.3%) | 1.00 (ref) | 0.769 |
| Yes | 218 (81.3%) | 6 (85.7%) | 1.38 (0.16–11.69) | ||
| Gender of oral sex partner | Same sex only | 19 (8.7%) | 1 (16.7%) | 1.00 (ref) | |
| Opposite sex only | 188 (85.8%) | 5 (83.3%) | 0.50 (0.06–4.55) | ||
| Both sexes | 12 (5.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | - | 0.686 | |
| Ever given oral sex | No | 9 (4.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | - | 0.612 |
| Yes | 210 (95.9%) | 6 (100%) | - | ||
| Number of partners given oral sex to in lifetime | 1–7 | 169 (80.5%) | 3 (50.0%) | 1.00 (ref) | 0.068 |
| 8 or more | 31 (19.5%) | 3 (50.0%) | 4.12 (0.80–21.17) | ||
| Number of partners given oral sex to in last year | None | 22 (10.4%) | 1 (16.7%) | 1.00 (ref) | 0.262 |
| 1 | 130 (61.6%) | 2 (33.3%) | 0.34 (0.03–3.89) | ||
| 2–3 | 38 (18.0%) | 1 (16.7%) | 0.58 (0.03–9.72) | ||
| 4 or more | 21 (10.0%) | 2 (33.3%) | 2.10 (0.18–24.87) | ||
| Use of condom when giving oral sex | Never | 176 (83.4%) | 6 (100%) | - | 0.880 |
| Seldom | 15 (7.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | - | ||
| Occasionally | 16 (7.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | - | ||
| Frequently | 2 (0.9%) | 0 (0.0%) | - | ||
| Very frequently | 2 (0.9%) | 0 (0.0%) | - | ||
| Ever received oral sex | No | 10 (4.6%) | 1 (16.7%) | 1.00 (ref) | 0.175 |
| Yes | 209 (95.4%) | 5 (83.3%) | 0.24 (0.03–2.24) | ||
| Number of partners received oral sex from in lifetime | 1 | 55 (25.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | - | 0.0004 |
| 2–3 | 66 (31.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | - | ||
| 4–7 | 50 (23.5%) | 1 (20.0%) | 1.00 (ref) | ||
| 8–15 | 29 (13.6%) | 1 (20.0%) | 1.72 (0.10–28.62) | ||
| 16–28 | 8 (3.8%) | 2 (40.0%) | 12.50 (1.01–154.40) | ||
| 29 or more | 5 (2.3%) | 1 (20.0%) | 10.00 (0.54–185.46) | ||
| Number of partners received oral sex from last year | None | 25 (11.7%) | 1 (20.0%) | 1.00 (ref) | 0.008 |
| 1 | 133 (62.4%) | 1 (20.0%) | 0.19 (0.01–3.10) | ||
| 2–3 | 31 (14.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | - | ||
| 4 or more | 24 (11.3%) | 3 (60.0%) | 3.12 (0.30–32.16) | ||
| Ever had sexual intercourse | No | 61 (22.7%) | 1 (14.3%) | 1.00 (ref) | 0.599 |
| Yes | 208 (77.3%) | 6 (85.7%) | 1.76 (0.21–14.90) | ||
| No | 300 (100%) | 6 (85.7%) | - | ||
| Ever diagnosed with or treated for HIV/AIDS | Yes | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (14.3%) | - | |
| No | 300 (100%) | 6 (85.7%) | - | 0.023 | |
| Have you ever received the Gardasil vaccine | No | 192 (64.2%) | 7 (100%) | - | 0.146 |
| Yes | 98 (32.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | - | ||
| Don't know | 9 (3.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | - | ||
We asked if the participants thought it was possible to get HPV from engaging in oral sex and 58% answered yes, 3% no, 8% not impossible, but rare, and 31% were not sure. We also investigated the knowledge of protection from STIs when engaging in oral sex and the majority of students (91%) thought that use of male condom would be protective. Table 3 presents the results of all means of protection that were included in the questionnaire.
Table 3. Proportion of positive responses to nominated measures against STI when engaging in oral sex.
| Means of protection | yes n (%) |
| Male condom | 279 (91) |
| Female condom | 126 (41) |
| Cling wrap | 15 (5) |
| Spermicide | 5 (2) |
| Oral sex, not involving ejaculation | 18 (6) |
| Contraceptive patch | 5 (2) |
| Dental dam | 72 (23) |
| Contraceptive pill | 7 (2) |
| Intrauterine device | 3 (1) |
Discussion
Here we investigated the prevalence and determinants of oral HPV infections in a sample of young Australians. We obtained DNA samples from oral rinse samples and used PCR primers (GP+) to detect a wide spectrum of α-papillomaviruses [15], and found an oral HPV prevalence of 2.3% in our sample. Previous reports of oral HPV prevalence have varied greatly between different geographic areas. The largest study on oral HPV prevalence in the United States, performed by Gillison et al on 5,579 individuals, reported an overall prevalence of 6.9% [10]. In our study the age group 18–24 years had an oral HPV prevalence of 1.6% (4/244) and the US study 5.6%, and the age group 25–35 years 5.0% (3/60) compared to 7.1% and 7.3% for the US study's age groups 25–29 years and 30–34 years, respectively [10]. The oral HPV prevalence was lower in our study, but both studies showed an increasing prevalence with age. The oral α-HPV prevalences in several American studies have ranged from 3.3% to 25%, but were performed on different populations (16–20 year olds only, men only and the general population) [10], [11], [14], [17]. One of these studies was conducted in men in Washington (USA) with a similar age range to our study (18–24 years), and found an oral HPV prevalence of 7.5% [17]. The oral α-HPV prevalence in three Scandinavian studies has been lower (1.0%–2.8%), with the exceptions of one performed at a sexual health clinic for youths, where it was much higher [7], [13], [18], [19]. Reasons for the different HPV prevalences reported could be due to different sampling methods used (rinse with mouthwash or saline, using varying volumes, as well as using a cytobrush) and some differences in HPV detection methods used (different PCR primer pairs and methods for HPV typing (sequencing or arrays)). Aside from these methodological differences, there may also be true differences in HPV prevalence between the different populations investigated.
The most commonly detected HPV type in our study was HPV-18 detected in three of the seven positive samples. HPV-16, -67, -69 and -90 were isolated in one sample each. HPV-16 and -18 are both common high-risk HPV types, while HPV-67, -69 and -90 are less commonly reported types isolated from vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia and cervicovaginal cells [20]–[22]. The reason for HPV-67, -69 and -90 being less commonly reported could be because these types are not included in standard HPV assays; it does not necessarily mean that actual infection is less common.
We found that oral HPV infection was significantly associated with male gender. This has also been reported in the largest oral HPV infection population-based study to date, with 10.1% in men and 3.6% in women [10]. A Swedish study on adolescents found that the oral HPV prevalence was higher in young women (3.1%) compared to men (0.6%) [13], although this difference was not statistically significant. Male gender has previously been associated with higher HPV prevalence in HNSCCs [2].
Receiving oral sex was strongly associated with oral HPV infection in our population, but we found no associations with passionate kissing, giving oral sex or sexual intercourse (number or partners or frequency). Several other studies have found oral HPV infection to be associated with oral sex behaviours, number of partners as well as frequency [4], [14], [17], [23]. One multi-national study, of men from U.S., Brazil and Mexico, reported no association with oral sex and oral HPV prevalence [24].
Self-reported HIV diagnosis was found to be associated with oral HPV infection. HIV infection has previously been linked with increased odds ratio of prevalent oral HPV infection [25].
Some U.S studies have reported strong associations between marijuana use and oral HPV infection, both in healthy populations and HNSCC patients [4], [10], but we found no association with ever having used illicit drugs and oral HPV status.
About one third of the participants of our study had received one or more doses of the Gardasil® vaccine, and the great majority of these students were females (95/98). Only one study has evaluated the effect HPV vaccination has on oral HPV prevalence, using the bivalent HPV-16/-18 Cervarix® in a Costa Rican population and found that oral HPV prevalence was much lower in the vaccinated population after 4 years follow-up [26]. None of the oral HPV positive individuals in our sample were Gardasil® vaccinated. Four of the oral HPV positive students had infections with HPV-16 and -18, which potentially could have been prevented by HPV vaccination.
Strengths of the current study include the collection of detailed lifestyle and sexual behaviour information from all participants. Also, a sensitive technique was used for determining the presence of α-HPV DNA in the oral rinse samples. However, while the sample was relatively large, the prevalence of oral HPV was low, and our study was underpowered to fully explore associations with all possible explanatory factors. While few of the associations were statistically significant, the magnitude and direction of the associations are plausible with current knowledge, and should be examined in larger datasets or through meta-analysis. In addition, our sample was recruited from a single tertiary education institution, and thus while our findings cannot be generalised to all Australians in the same age group, we believe they are likely to reflect the experiences of those in similar settings.
In conclusion, we found that oral HPV prevalence was low in this sample of young Australians. Oral HPV infection was found to be associated with male gender, receiving oral sex and self-reported diagnosis of HIV. Given the low HPV DNA prevalence in this study, larger studies are required both in Australia and internationally to determine oral HPV infection in the general population.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the participants of this study.
Funding Statement
This project was funded by NHMRC program grant 552429. Annika Antonsson is funded by a Research Fellowship from the Garnett Passe and Rodney Williams Memorial Foundation. David C. Whiteman is funded by a Future Fellowship (FT0990987) from the Australian Research Council. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the funding bodies.
References
- 1. Attner P, Nasman A, Du J, Hammarstedt L, Ramqvist T, et al. (2012) Survival in patients with human papillomavirus positive tonsillar cancer in relation to treatment. Int J Cancer 131: 1124–1130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Chaturvedi AK, Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM, Hernandez BY, Xiao W, et al. (2011) Human papillomavirus and rising oropharyngeal cancer incidence in the United States. J Clin Oncol 29: 4294–4301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Nasman A, Attner P, Hammarstedt L, Du J, Eriksson M, et al. (2009) Incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV) positive tonsillar carcinoma in Stockholm, Sweden: an epidemic of viral-induced carcinoma? Int J Cancer 125: 362–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Gillison ML, D'Souza G, Westra W, Sugar E, Xiao W, et al. (2008) Distinct risk factor profiles for human papillomavirus type 16-positive and human papillomavirus type 16-negative head and neck cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 100: 407–420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Gillison ML, Koch WM, Capone RB, Spafford M, Westra WH, et al. (2000) Evidence for a causal association between human papillomavirus and a subset of head and neck cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 92: 709–720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Hong AM, Grulich AE, Jones D, Lee CS, Garland SM, et al. (2010) Squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx in Australian males induced by human papillomavirus vaccine targets. Vaccine 28: 3269–3272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Du J, Nordfors C, Ahrlund-Richter A, Sobkowiak M, Romanitan M, et al. (2012) Prevalence of oral human papillomavirus infection among youth, Sweden. Emerg Infect Dis 18: 1468–1471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. D'Souza G, Kreimer AR, Viscidi R, Pawlita M, Fakhry C, et al. (2007) Case-control study of human papillomavirus and oropharyngeal cancer. N Engl J Med 356: 1944–1956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Kreimer AR, Clifford GM, Boyle P, Franceschi S (2005) Human papillomavirus types in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas worldwide: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14: 467–475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Gillison ML, Broutian T, Pickard RK, Tong ZY, Xiao W, et al. (2012) Prevalence of oral HPV infection in the United States, 2009–2010. JAMA 307: 693–703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Bottalico D, Chen Z, Dunne A, Ostoloza J, McKinney S, et al. (2011) The oral cavity contains abundant known and novel human papillomaviruses from the Betapapillomavirus and Gammapapillomavirus genera. J Infect Dis 204: 787–792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Kurose K, Terai M, Soedarsono N, Rabello D, Nakajima Y, et al. (2004) Low prevalence of HPV infection and its natural history in normal oral mucosa among volunteers on Miyako Island, Japan. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 98: 91–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nordfors C, Grun N, Haeggblom L, Tertipis N, Sivars L, et al.. (2013) Oral human papillomavirus prevalence in high school students of one municipality in Sweden. Scand J Infect Dis. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 14. Pickard RK, Xiao W, Broutian TR, He X, Gillison ML (2012) The prevalence and incidence of oral human papillomavirus infection among young men and women, aged 18–30 years. Sex Transm Dis 39: 559–566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. de Roda Husman AM, Walboomers JM, van den Brule AJ, Meijer CJ, Snijders PJ (1995) The use of general primers GP5 and GP6 elongated at their 3' ends with adjacent highly conserved sequences improves human papillomavirus detection by PCR. J Gen Virol 76: 1057–1062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. de Roda Husman AM, Walboomers JM, Hopman E, Bleker OP, Helmerhorst TM, et al. (1995) HPV prevalence in cytomorphologically normal cervical scrapes of pregnant women as determined by PCR: the age-related pattern. J Med Virol 46: 97–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Edelstein ZR, Schwartz SM, Hawes S, Hughes JP, Feng Q, et al. (2012) Rates and determinants of oral human papillomavirus infection in young men. Sex Transm Dis 39: 860–867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Forslund O, Johansson H, Madsen KG, Kofoed K (2013) The nasal mucosa contains a large spectrum of human papillomavirus types from the Betapapillomavirus and Gammapapillomavirus genera. J Infect Dis 208: 1335–1341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Hansson BG, Rosenquist K, Antonsson A, Wennerberg J, Schildt EB, et al. (2005) Strong association between infection with human papillomavirus and oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a population-based case-control study in southern Sweden. Acta Otolaryngol 125: 1337–1344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Kino N, Sata T, Sato Y, Sugase M, Matsukura T (2000) Molecular cloning and nucleotide sequence analysis of a novel human papillomavirus (Type 82) associated with vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 7: 91–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Kirii Y, Matsukura T (1998) Nucleotide sequence and phylogenetic classification of human papillomavirus type 67. Virus Genes 17: 117–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Terai M, Burk RD (2002) Identification and characterization of 3 novel genital human papillomaviruses by overlapping polymerase chain reaction: candHPV89, candHPV90, and candHPV91. J Infect Dis 185: 1794–1797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. D'Souza G, Agrawal Y, Halpern J, Bodison S, Gillison ML (2009) Oral sexual behaviors associated with prevalent oral human papillomavirus infection. J Infect Dis 199: 1263–1269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Kreimer AR, Villa A, Nyitray AG, Abrahamsen M, Papenfuss M, et al. (2011) The epidemiology of oral HPV infection among a multinational sample of healthy men. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 20: 172–182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Beachler DC, Weber KM, Margolick JB, Strickler HD, Cranston RD, et al. (2012) Risk factors for oral HPV infection among a high prevalence population of HIV-positive and at-risk HIV-negative adults. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21: 122–133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Herrero R, Quint W, Hildesheim A, Gonzalez P, Struijk L, et al. (2013) Reduced Prevalence of Oral Human Papillomavirus (HPV) 4 Years after Bivalent HPV Vaccination in a Randomized Clinical Trial in Costa Rica. PLoS One 8: e68329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]