Abstract
Population analysis was performed for 42 Escherichia coli isolates to determine whether heterogeneity of resistance was a factor in piperacillin-tazobactam category differences between agar dilution and broth microdilution. Of 20 isolates discordant between methods, 80% were heterogeneous. Of 22 isolates in agreement, 59% were homogeneous. Heterogeneity and homogeneity rates for those in agreement were significantly different from those that were discordant (P value, 0.010). Heterogeneity of resistance expression appears to be an important factor in category differences observed between broth microdilution and agar dilution for piperacillin-tazobactam.
TEXT
Interpretation of antimicrobial susceptibility tests can be subjective, even for established reference methods. Various in vitro methods to assess susceptibility have been developed, and conditions can vary widely during measurements. This diversity can cause differences in the metabolic status of bacterial cells and thus their reactivity to antibiotics, implying that results from different methods can vary per strain, as was recently seen in a multicenter study of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1). Methodological differences can lead to very major errors (VMEs) (reference method resistant and comparator susceptible), which may lead to treatment failure. Major errors (MEs) (reference method susceptible and comparator resistant) can also occur and, although less serious therapeutically, can lead to disqualification of otherwise useful antimicrobials. The frequency of VMEs and MEs depends on the methods used and organism/antimicrobial combinations. However, certain drugs (especially combinations) are often problematic. Root causes for such differences are usually unknown, but clear differences between piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) broth microdilution (BMD) and agar dilution (AD) results were observed for isolates of several species (2–5). Although differences between BMD and AD have been observed for other species, the population analysis discussed here was limited to Escherichia coli. We recently demonstrated that this aberrant phenotype can be clonal in E. coli (5). In this study, isolates were tested by population analysis (PA) in order to determine whether heterogeneity of resistance expression was a factor in the category differences observed between BMD and AD for TZP.
A subset of 42 E. coli isolates was selected from a larger set of Enterobacteriaceae obtained for the purpose of studying TZP susceptibility (5). The isolates were obtained globally from as many geographically diverse locations as possible. Isolates in agreement as well as those in disagreement between BMD and AD were included. Strain characteristics are included in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Tally | Stock no. | Isolate origin | β-Lactamase(s) | Composite BMD (μg/ml) | Composite AD (μg/ml) | CAT between BMD and AD? | Population analysis interpretation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 904944 | Canada | blaTEM-1 | 128 | 8 | N | HET |
2 | 907357 | Austria | blaTEM-1 | 128 | 8 | N | HET |
3 | 907442 | Scotland | blaTEM-1 | 128 | 16 | N | HET |
4 | 907672 | United States | blaTEM-1 | >256 | 64 | N | HET |
5 | 907700 | United States | blaTEM-1 | >256 | 8 | N | HET |
6 | 907710 | United States | blaTEM-1, blaCTX-M | >256 | 8 | N | HET |
7 | 907892 | United States | blaTEM-1 | >256 | 8 | N | HET |
8 | 908519 | United States | blaTEM-1 | 128 | 64 | N | HET |
9 | 908521 | United States | blaTEM-1 | 128 | 32 | N | HET |
10 | 908522 | United States | blaTEM-1 | 256 | 64 | N | HET |
11 | 908555 | Italy | blaTEM-1 | 64 | 16 | N | HET |
12 | 908585 | Spain | blaTEM-1 | >256 | 64 | N | HET |
13 | 908675 | U.K. | blaTEM-1 | 256 | 64 | N | HET |
14 | 908691 | South Korea | blaTEM-1, blaCTX-M | 64 | 8 | N | HET |
15 | 907355 | Austria | blaTEM-1 | 256 | 16 | N | HET |
16 | 907402 | Scotland | blaTEM-1 | 256 | 8 | N | HET |
17 | 907035 | United States | blaTEM-1,blaCIT | 128 | 64 | N | HOM |
18 | 907715 | United States | blaTEM-1 | 256 | 32 | N | HOM |
19 | 907889 | United States | blaTEM-1 | 64 | 1 | N | HOM |
20 | 908632 | Thailand | blaCTX-M | 32 | 16 | N | HOM |
21 | 905162 | Canada | blaTEM-1 | 2 | 4 | Y | HET |
22 | 907163 | Germany | blaTEM-1 | >256 | >256 | Y | HET |
23 | 907446 | Scotland | blaTEM-1 | 4 | 2 | Y | HET |
24 | 907701 | United States | blaTEM-1 | >256 | >256 | Y | HET |
25 | 907713 | United States | blaTEM-1 | 2 | 2 | Y | HET |
26 | 908541 | Germany | blaTEM-1 | >256 | >256 | Y | HET |
27 | 908573 | China | blaTEM-1, blaCTX-M, blaSHV | >256 | >256 | Y | HET |
28 | 908616 | Hong Kong | blaTEM-1 | >256 | 256 | Y | HET |
29 | 908624 | South Africa | blaTEM-1 | 256 | 128 | Y | HET |
30 | 904942 | Canada | blaTEM-1 | >256 | >256 | Y | HOM |
31 | 907075 | United States | blaTEM-40 | >256 | >256 | Y | HOM |
32 | 907149 | Germany | blaTEM-1 | >256 | >256 | Y | HOM |
33 | 907268 | Germany | blaSHV | >256 | >256 | Y | HOM |
34 | 907374 | Austria | blaOXA-1 | 2 | 4 | Y | HOM |
35 | 907384 | Scotland | blaTEM-1, blaCIT | 128 | 128 | Y | HOM |
36 | 907578 | United States | blaTEM-1, blaFOX | >256 | >256 | Y | HOM |
37 | 907606 | United States | blaTEM-1, blaCIT | >256 | 256 | Y | HOM |
38 | 907608 | United States | blaCTX-M | >256 | >256 | Y | HOM |
39 | 907720 | United States | blaSHV | >256 | >256 | Y | HOM |
40 | 908524 | United States | blaTEM-1 | >256 | >256 | Y | HOM |
41 | 908525 | United States | blaTEM-1, blaOXA-1, blaCTX-M | >256 | >256 | Y | HOM |
42 | 103934 | QC ATCC 35218 | blaTEM-1 | 1 | 2 | Y | HOM |
CAT, categorical agreement (i.e., susceptible, intermediate, or resistant); Y, yes; N, no; HET, heterogeneous; HOM, homogeneous; QC, quality control strain.
BMD and AD TZP susceptibility testing was performed according to CLSI guidelines (6) and was done in triplicate. MICs were determined by examining the growth for each of the three replicates for each isolate and method. The lowest concentration that completely inhibited visible growth as detected by the unaided eye was recorded as the MIC. If two of three results were the same, that MIC was used as the composite (“voted”) result. If three results differed, the middle result was used. CLSI breakpoints (7) were applied to determine category interpretations (susceptible, intermediate, or resistant) (6). BMD and AD category interpretations were determined and compared for each isolate.
PA was performed by testing each isolate on a series of agar dilution plates, prepared without drug (growth control), and with piperacillin in serial doubling dilutions between 1 and 256 μg/ml plus tazobactam at a fixed concentration of 4 μg/ml (8, 9). Plates were inoculated with 100 μl of a 0.5 McFarland suspension (in 0.45% saline), and the inoculum was spread using a disposable bent inoculator and a manual plate spinner. Plates were incubated for 16 to 20 h at 35°C. The number of colonies on each plate in the series per isolate was recorded. Results were interpreted as follows: if MICs of the population spanned more than three concentrations, the population was considered to be heterogeneous; if MICs spanned no more than three concentrations, the population was considered to be homogeneous.
Chi-square analysis was used to determine statistical significance. A P value of ≤0.05 was considered significant.
Molecular testing was performed using crude lysates, and PCR was performed to determine the presence of blaTEM, blaSHV, the blaOXA-1 group, blaCTX-M, and plasmid-mediated blaAMP-C. PCR products for blaTEM were sequenced. The PCR assay for plasmid-mediated blaAMP-C was able to detect six different families of plasmid ampC forms (5, 10).
DiversiLab (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) strain typing was performed on all isolates according to the manufacturer's instructions. DiversiLab uses repetitive sequence-based PCR, which allows for the amplification of many differently sized fragments (amplicons) representing the DNA within noncoding, repetitive sequences in the genome. The arrangement of these fragments shows specific genotypic differences and therefore can be used to discriminate bacteria at the strain level.
A summary of results is shown in Table 1.
Of 42 total isolates, 22 were in categorical agreement between BMD and AD and 20 were not. Of the 22 in agreement, 13 (59.1%) were homogeneous and 9 (40.1%) were heterogeneous. Of the 20 not in agreement, 16 (80%) were heterogeneous and 4 (20%) were homogeneous. The rates of heterogeneity for those in agreement compared to those in disagreement were significantly different (P = 0.010). The rates of homogeneity were also significantly different (P = 0.010) between those in agreement and those in disagreement. Higher MICs were observed for BMD when BMD and AD were discordant. Excluding one-dilution differences between BMD and AD (which were within essential agreement), there were 18 isolates with TZP MICs more resistant by BMD and no isolates more resistant by AD. It cannot be determined with certainty whether BMD or AD correlates better with clinical outcome; these data have not been recorded. The conservative approach was to consider BMD less risky regarding patient safety since BMD MICs are higher when the two methods are discordant.
The majority of E. coli isolates studied (28/42; 66.7%) harbored only the blaTEM-1 gene; 22 of 24 heterogeneous isolates harbored only blaTEM-1. The homogeneous isolates contained a wider variety of β-lactamases, some in combination with blaTEM-1, blaSHV alone, or the blaOXA-1 group alone. The remaining two heterogeneous isolates harbored blaTEM-1 and blaCTX-M. Sequencing was done only on blaTEM isolates. Since an E. coli isolate with a basal level of blaTEM-1 is not expected to be TZP resistant, further investigation of the resistance mechanism for these isolates was initiated. Possible explanations for the observed resistant phenotype include hyperproduction of β-lactamase, higher overall β-lactamase level due to the number of β-lactamases present per isolate, variation in periplasmic concentration of β-lactamase, efflux alterations, and/or porin mutations (11–15).
DiversiLab strain typing showed that although there were similarities between some strains, there was no unique clone responsible for either heterogeneity of resistance or discordant results (data not shown).
Data were also analyzed with the application of EUCAST breakpoints (data not shown). TZP EUCAST breakpoints are lower than CLSI breakpoints, and more isolates were in category agreement between BMD and AD with EUCAST breakpoints than with CLSI breakpoints. For those in category agreement with EUCAST breakpoints, there was an even split between heterogeneous and homogeneous isolates (15 of each). However, for those that were discordant between BMD and AD, a higher percentage were heterogeneous (10/12, or 83.3%) than homogeneous (2/12, or 16.7%). Therefore, the trend toward a higher percentage of heterogeneity for isolates discordant between BMD and AD was still present with EUCAST breakpoints.
The data presented support that TZP resistance differences between BMD and AD are at least in part due to heterogeneity of resistance expression. The exact mechanism of differences observed requires further investigation, although delayed growth of the resistant subpopulation may be responsible.
It was recently shown that a factor in the outcome of bacteremia episodes was the TZP MIC of the causative strains of E. coli (16), thus underscoring the importance of accurate MICs. We showed that population heterogeneity is correlated to TZP susceptibility variability between reference methods, thereby demonstrating that susceptibility testing can be confounded by basic biological characteristics of the microbial cells. It is important to be aware that for some specific strains, even highly valued susceptibility reference methods may generate conflicting results.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print 16 December 2013
REFERENCES
- 1.Juan C, Conejo MC, Tormo N, Gimeno C, Pascual Á, Oliver A. 2013. Challenges for accurate susceptibility testing, detection and interpretation of β-lactam resistance phenotypes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: results from a Spanish multicentre study. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 68:619–630. 10.1093/jac/dks439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Traczewski M, Jorgensen J, Wanger A. 2012. Multi-laboratory comparison of three reference methods for determination of piperacillin and piperacillin-tazobactam susceptibility of Gram-negative organisms, poster 2566. Abstr. 112th Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
- 3.Thomson KS, Black J, Moland ES, Reuben J, Wiles T, Brasso W. 2008. Irreproducible piperacillin/tazobactam minimum inhibitory concentrations in microdilution tests with Escherichia coli strains. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 31:83–85. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.08.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hung KH, Wang MC, Huang AH, Yan JJ, Wu JJ. 2012. Heteroresistance to cephalosporins and penicillins in Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50:721–726. 10.1128/JCM.05085-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Creely D, Zambardi G, van Belkum A, Dunne WM, Jr, Peyret M, Gayral JP, Shortridge D, Shubert C. 2013. International dissemination of Escherichia coli strains with discrepant behavior in phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility tests. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 32:997–1002. 10.1007/s10096-013-1837-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2012. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 9th ed. M07-A9 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA [Google Scholar]
- 7.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2013. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 23rd informational supplement. M100-S23 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ikonomidis A, Neou E, Gogou V, Vrioni G, Tsakris A, Pournaras S. 2009. Heteroresistance to meropenem in carbapenem-susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47:4055–4059. 10.1128/JCM.00959-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tato M, Morosini M, Garcia L, Albertí S, Coque MT, Cantón R. 2010. Carbapenem heteroresistance in VIM-1-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates belonging to the same clone: consequences for routine susceptibility testing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48:4089–4093. 10.1128/JCM.01130-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Perez-Perez FJ, Hanson ND. 2002. Detection of plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamase genes in clinical isolates by using multiplex PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:2153–2162. 10.1128/JCM.40.6.2153-2162.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Waltner-Toews R, Paterson D, Qureshi Z, Sidjabat H, Adams-Haduch J, Shutt K, Jones M, Tian G, Pasculle A, Doi Y. 2011. Clinical characteristics of bloodstream infections due to ampicillin-sulbactam resistant, non-extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and the role of TEM-1 hyperproduction. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55:495-501. 10.1128/AAC.00797-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lartique M, Leflon-Guibout V, Poirel L, Nordmann P, Nicolas-Chanoine M. 2002. Promoters P3, Pa/Pb, and P5 upstream from blaTEM genes and their relationship to β-lactam resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:4035–4037. 10.1128/AAC.46.12.4035-4037.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Poole K. 2005. Efflux-mediated antimicrobial resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 56:20–51. 10.1093/jac/dki171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Webber M, Piddock L. 2003. The importance of efflux pumps in bacterial antibiotic resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 51:9–11. 10.1093/jac/dkg050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Reguera J, Baquero F, Perez-Diaz J, Martinez J. 1991. Factors determining resistance to β-lactam combined with β-lactamase inhibitors in Escherichia coli. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 27:569–575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Retamar P, López-Cerero L, Muniain MA, Pascual A, Rodríguez-Baño J, ESBL-REIPI/GEIH Group 2013. Impact of the MIC of piperacillin-tazobactam on the outcome of patients with bacteremia due to extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57:3402–3404. 10.1128/AAC.00135-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]