ABSTRACT
The V proteins of paramyxoviruses control the innate immune response. In particular, the V protein of the genus Morbillivirus interferes with the signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1), STAT2, and melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (mda5) signaling pathways. To characterize the contributions of these pathways to canine distemper virus (CDV) pathogenesis, we took advantage of the knowledge about the mechanisms of interaction between the measles virus V protein with these key regulators of innate immunity. We generated recombinant CDVs with V proteins unable to properly interact with STAT1, STAT2, or mda5. A virus with combined STAT2 and mda5 deficiencies was also generated, and available wild-type and V-protein-knockout viruses were used as controls. Ferrets infected with wild-type and STAT1-blind viruses developed severe leukopenia and loss of lymphocyte proliferation activity and succumbed to the disease within 14 days. In contrast, animals infected with viruses with STAT2 or mda5 defect or both STAT2 and mda5 defects developed a mild self-limiting disease similar to that associated with the V-knockout virus. This study demonstrates the importance of interference with STAT2 and mda5 signaling for CDV immune evasion and provides a starting point for the development of morbillivirus vectors with reduced immunosuppressive properties.
IMPORTANCE The V proteins of paramyxoviruses interfere with the recognition of the virus by the immune system of the host. For morbilliviruses, the V protein is known to interact with the signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) and STAT2 and the melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (mda5), which are involved in interferon signaling. Here, we examined the contribution of each of these signaling pathways to the pathogenesis of the carnivore morbillivirus canine distemper virus. Using viruses selectively unable to interfere with the respective signaling pathway to infect ferrets, we found that inhibition of STAT2 and mda5 signaling was critical for lethal disease. Our findings provide new insights in the mechanisms of morbillivirus immune evasion and may lead to the development of new vaccines and oncolytic vectors.
INTRODUCTION
Morbilliviruses, including measles virus (MeV), which infects humans and certain nonhuman primates, and the carnivore morbillivirus canine distemper virus (CDV), cause a severe acute disease characterized by rash, fever, and respiratory and gastrointestinal symptoms, followed by generalized immunosuppression (1–3). This rapid and profound immunosuppression facilitates secondary infections, which make important contributions to morbillivirus-associated morbidity and mortality (4, 5). The morbillivirus V protein is the primary viral immune interference protein, targeting the innate host response at multiple levels (6–8). The V-protein mRNA is transcribed from the phosphoprotein (P) gene by insertion of a nontemplated guanosine at an editing site located in the middle of the gene (9, 10). Consequently, V shares its amino-terminal part with P, but has a unique carboxy terminus. The latter contains a cysteine-rich domain, which binds two atoms of zinc (11, 12) and is highly conserved among morbilliviruses and other paramyxoviruses (13).
The shared amino-terminal domain and the unique carboxyl-terminal domain contribute to the innate immunity-interfering functions of morbillivirus V protein. The P/V shared domain alone can block type I and type II interferon (IFN) responses. This activity has been mapped to amino acids 110 to 130, with tyrosine 110 being essential for binding the signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) molecule (14–16). Inactivation of the zinc-binding domains in the V-protein unique region results in a 70% loss of its type I IFN inhibitory activity (8), and this region can directly inhibit beta interferon (IFN-β) synthesis by interacting with the double-stranded RNA sensor melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (mda5) (7, 17, 18). Systematic mutagenesis of the entire region revealed that aspartic acid at position 248 and, to a lesser extent, phenylalanine 246 are important for the inhibition of STAT2 nuclear translocation (6, 8). Similarly, it was demonstrated that a conserved arginine at position 235 is required for mda5 interference in several paramyxoviruses (19). The STAT2 and mda5 interaction sites of the MeV carboxyl-terminal domain are thus located at opposite sides of the first zinc-binding domain, which is formed between histidine at position 232 and the first conserved cysteine at position 251.
Relevance of morbillivirus V proteins for virulence has been demonstrated in different susceptible hosts. Rhesus macaques infected with a V-knockout (Vko) wild-type MeV experienced shorter viremia and less immunosuppression (20), and infection with a STAT1blind virus resulted in a similar phenotype (21). In ferrets, a Vko derivative of a lethal wild-type CDV strain caused only a very mild disease and no longer triggered the inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation upon nonspecific stimulation that is indicative of immunosuppression (22). To assess the contributions of the different V-protein interactions to the control of innate immunity, we first validated the residues involved in V-protein interactions with STAT2 and mda5 in the CDV context. A panel of STAT1-, STAT2-, mda5-, and combined STAT2/mda5-blind derivatives of the 5804P wild-type CDV strain was generated, and their growth phenotypes were characterized in vitro. The virulence and extent of immunosuppression were then assessed in ferrets, and the extent of IFN induction was quantified.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cells and viruses.
VerodogSLAMtag cells (23) and Huh7 cells (JCRB0403) were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Life Technologies, Burlington, ON, Canada) with 5% fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies). CDV strains 5804PeH (24) and 5804PeH Vko (22), and all recombinant viruses produced were grown in VerodogSLAMtag cells.
Luciferase reporter gene assays.
The 5804P V gene was cloned into the mammalian expression plasmid pCG, and the respective mutations and the individual mutations W246G, I247L, D248Y, and K249E were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis. For each V-protein mutant, triplicate wells of Huh7 cells seeded in black 96-well plates (Greiner Bio-One, Monroe, NC, USA) were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Burlington, ON, Canada) with 0.08 μg of the respective V-gene expression plasmid or empty vector control, 0.04 μg of pRL-TK (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) as an internal control for transfection efficiency, and 0.08 μg of either pISRE-Luc (Luc stands for luciferase) (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA) to assess type I IFN-mediated transcriptional activation, pGAS-luc (Stratagene) for IFN-γ-mediated activation, or p125-luc together with mda5 or RIG-I (retinoic acid-inducible gene I product) expression plasmids for IFN-β promoter activation. At 40 h after pISRE-Luc transfection, the medium was replaced with fresh medium supplemented with 1,000 U/ml of universal type I IFN-α (PBL Interferon Source, Piscataway, NJ, USA). To assess pGAS-luc-mediated or IFN-β promoter activation, the medium was replaced 24 h after transfection with fresh medium supplemented with 100 ng/ml of human IFN-γ (PBL Interferon Source) or 1 μg/ml of poly(I·C) (LyoVec; InvivoGen, San Diego, CA, USA), respectively. Cells were harvested 8 h after IFN-α stimulation, 18 h after IFN-γ stimulation, or 20 h after poly(I·C) stimulation in Dual-Glo luciferase assay lysis buffer (Promega), and luciferase activity was measured using a luminometer (Infinite 200 PRO microplate reader; Tecan Asia Ptd. Ltd., Singapore). Values for firefly luciferase activity were normalized to Renilla luciferase activity, and results were expressed as a percentage of the empty vector control stimulated value. Each luciferase assay was performed at least three times.
Antibodies and indirect immunofluorescence.
CDV V protein was detected with a polyclonal rabbit antipeptide serum raised against amino acids 18 to 39 of the shared P/V domain (25). STAT1 and STAT2 were detected using commercially available monoclonal antibodies (C-111 and A-7, respectively; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Alexa Fluor 568-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit (Life Technologies) and Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated goat anti-mouse (Life Technologies) secondary antibodies were used. For immunofluorescence analysis, 4 × 104 Huh7 cells were grown in Nunc Lab-Tek II 8-chamber slide system (Thermo Fisher, Langenselbold, Germany) and transfected with 0.2 μg of empty vector or V-expressing plasmids using Lipofectamine 2000 according to the manufacturer's instructions. At 36 h posttransfection, cells were stimulated with 1,000 U/ml IFN-α2b (Essex Pharma GmbH, Munich, Germany) or 2,000 U/ml of human IFN-γ (Preprotech, Hamburg, Germany) for 30 min. The cells were then washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Life Technologies), fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 10 min at room temperature, and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 min at 4°C. Samples were blocked with 2% fetal bovine serum for 1 h followed by sequential incubation with the respective primary and secondary antibodies for 45 min and 30 min at room temperature, respectively. Finally, cell nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for 1 min at room temperature. Images were obtained using a confocal microscope (Olympus FluoView 1000) during 405-nm, 561-nm, and 633-nm laser stimulation using an UOlanSApo 60×/1.35 oil objective. Colocalization was analyzed using the ImageJ software Intensity correlation analysis plugin (National Institutes of Health). Pearson's coefficients were calculated for every cell individually by manually defining the region of interest. Values −1 to 0 indicate no colocalization, values around zero represent random distribution (no correlation), and values 0 to 1 indicate colocalization. The higher the Pearson's coefficient, the stronger the degree of colocalization.
Western blot analysis.
VerodogSLAMtag cells were plated at a density of 5 × 105 cells per well in a 6-well plate, infected with the respective viruses at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.1, and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. For the analysis of viral protein expression, cells were lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, 150 mM NaCl), and proteins were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by transfer to polyvinyl difluoride membranes (Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). P and V proteins were detected using the CDV P/V-specific rabbit antipeptide antiserum against the P/V shared domain (25) in combination with a peroxidase-coupled donkey anti-rabbit secondary antiserum and visualized using ECL Plus Western blotting detection system (GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and an ImageQuant LAS 4000 chemiluminescent image analyzer (GE Healthcare).
Generation of recombinant viruses.
The mutations resulting in the amino acid substitution Y110H, E235A, WI246/7GL, and C255S (Fig. 1A) were introduced into a subcloned P gene fragment flanked by the unique restriction sites KpnI and SacII. The fragment was then transferred into the 5804PeH genomic cDNA containing the enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) in an additional transcriptional unit between the hemagglutinin (H) and polymerase (L) genes. Recombinant viruses were recovered using the reverse genetics system described in reference 25. Briefly, 293 cells were transfected with expression plasmids encoding the MeV nucleoprotein (N), phosphoprotein (P), and polymerase (L) protein and the T7 polymerase, together with the respective genomic 5804PeH plasmid. Two days after transfection, the cells were transferred onto VerodogSLAMtag cells, and individual syncytia were picked and expanded on fresh VerodogSLAMtag cells to produce virus stocks. Virus titers were quantified by the limited dilution method and expressed as 50% tissue culture infectious doses (TCID50).
Animal experiments and assessment of virulence.
All animal experiments were approved by the INRS-Institut Armand-Frappier or SingHealth Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees. Groups of at least six CDV-seronegative male ferrets (Mustela putorius furo) were infected intranasally with 105 TCID50 of each virus as described previously (22). Rash, fever, and weight loss were assessed daily and graded on a scale from 0 to 2 (scored as 0, 1, and 2). The total white blood cell count was determined from fresh EDTA-treated blood diluted 1:100 in 3% acetic acid, and the viremia and lymphocyte proliferation activity were quantified. Briefly, the erythrocytes in the EDTA-treated blood were lysed in ACK lysing buffer (Life Technologies). The white blood cells were then counted, and 10-fold dilution steps were transferred onto VerodogSLAMtag cells. Titers were expressed as TCID50/106 cells. At the last time point of virus detection in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), RNA was isolated from the remaining cells stored in RNAlater (Life Technologies), and the region of the P gene containing the mutation was amplified by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and sequenced.
Ficoll (GE Healthcare) density gradient centrifugation was used to isolate PBMCs from heparinized blood. The proliferation of PBMCs after stimulation with 15 μg/ml of phytohemagglutinin (PHA) (Life Technologies) was quantified using a chemiluminescence immunoassay based on the measurement of 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation during DNA synthesis (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN). The in vitro proliferation activity was expressed as the ratio between PHA-stimulated and nonstimulated cells.
IFN mRNA analysis.
Relative IFN-α, IFN-β, and IFN-γ mRNA levels were analyzed by semiquantitative real-time PCR analysis as described previously (26). Briefly, mRNA was isolated from PBMCs of infected ferrets using the RNeasy minikit (Qiagen, Mississauga, ON, Canada). Ten ng of RNA together with specific primers against ferret IFN-α, -β, or -γ was mixed with the QuantiTect SYBR green RT-PCR master mix (Qiagen) following the manufacturer's instructions. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA transcription was used as an internal control, and mRNA levels were normalized to day 0 values. The relative change in transcription levels was calculated using the formula fold change = 2−ΔΔCt to evaluate fold transcription (26, 27).
RESULTS
The STAT1, STAT2, and mda5 interaction sites in the V protein are conserved between MeV and CDV.
Morbilliviruses interfere with IFN activation by preventing the nuclear translocation of STAT1 and STAT2 (28) as well as downstream signaling through the intracellular pattern recognition receptor mda5 (7, 29). The V-protein residues involved in these functions have been mapped for MeV (8, 19), and the importance of Y110H for STAT1 binding and the region for STAT2 and mda5 interactions has been demonstrated for other morbilliviruses (16, 30). To investigate the roles of the different signaling pathways in morbillivirus pathogenesis, we selectively generated STAT1-, STAT2-, or mda5-blind CDV V proteins and a V protein with a disrupted zinc-binding domain (ZBDko) in the genetic background of the wild-type strain 5804P.
To specifically abolish STAT2 binding while maintaining the P open reading frame, the combination of the two point mutations W246G and I247L in the STAT2-binding region covering residues 240 to 250 identified in MeV V (8) was required (Fig. 1A and 2A and B). The WI246/7GL protein was STAT2blind but continued to block STAT1 signaling and IFN-β promoter activation (Fig. 1B to D). To generate a STAT1blind derivative, the Y110H mutation was introduced into the P/V shared amino-terminal part of the V protein, and the E235A and C255S mutations were introduced into the V-protein unique region (Fig. 2B) to obtain the mda5 and ZBDko derivatives, respectively (Fig. 2A).
The interference of the parental V protein and the four mutant V proteins with IFN signaling activation was evaluated using luciferase reporter gene assays. After transfection in Huh7 cells, all V proteins were expressed at similar levels (data not shown). Reporter plasmids carrying firefly luciferase under the control of either the IFN-γ-activated sequence (GAS) to evaluate STAT1-mediated type II IFN signaling activation, repetitive sequences of the IFN-stimulated response element (ISRE) to evaluate STAT1/STAT2 heterodimer-dependent type I signaling, or the IFN-β promoter in combination with mda5 or RIG-I expression plasmids were used. While the wild-type V protein strongly inhibited the induction of all these pathways, the respective signaling activity was selectively restored for the STAT1blind, STAT2blind, and mda5blind V protein mutants (Fig. 2C to E). However, in contrast to the type II IFN- and mda5-dependent signaling pathways, which were fully inhibited by all other mutants (Fig. 2C and E), a partial but significant (P < 0.001) loss of type I IFN signaling inhibition was also observed for the STAT1blind V protein and even more for the mda5blind V protein. Disruption of the zinc-binding domain in the V-protein carboxy terminus, which is highly conserved among all paramyxoviruses, prevented interference with the STAT2 and mda5 signaling pathways at levels close to the respective individual STAT2blind and mda5blind mutants (Fig. 2D and E). Consistent with previous reports (7), RIG-I overexpression prevented the CDV V-protein-mediated inhibition of IFN-β promoter activation (data not shown).
STAT1blind and STAT2blind CDV V proteins selectively lose their ability to prevent nuclear translocation of the respective STAT protein.
Morbillivirus V proteins prevent type I and II IFN signaling by retaining STAT1 and STAT2 in the cytoplasm (16, 28). To evaluate the extent of STAT1 and STAT2 nuclear translocation inhibition associated with the different mutants, the intracellular distribution of the respective proteins was quantified by confocal microscopy after stimulation with IFN-γ and IFN-α, respectively. As reported previously (16), the wild-type CDV V protein efficiently blocked STAT1 and STAT2 nuclear translocation, while the STAT1blind mutant was no longer able to prevent STAT1 translocation (Fig. 3). The STAT2blind mutant no longer affected STAT2 distribution, while the mda5blind and ZBDko mutants retained their ability to block STAT1 and STAT2 nuclear translocation, albeit to a lesser extent than the wild-type CDV V protein (Fig. 4). The complete loss of type I IFN signaling inhibition seen for the ZBDko mutant (Fig. 2D) may thus be due to an additive effect of partial STAT2 cytoplasmic retention and the lack of mda5-mediated signaling (Fig. 2D) associated with this mutant.
Viruses carrying mutant V proteins replicate efficiently in IFN signaling-deficient cells.
To evaluate V-protein interference with the different IFN signaling pathways in the viral context, we introduced the respective mutations into the genome of 5804PeH, which expresses eGFP from an additional open reading frame inserted between the H and L genes (24). The Vko virus from a previous study was included as a control for complete loss of V-protein function (22). Western blot analysis revealed that all mutant V proteins were efficiently expressed and that the P-to-V ratios remained around 1:1 (Fig. 5A and data not shown). Time course analysis of cell-associated and cell-free virus production revealed similar replication efficiencies during early infection stages (Fig. 5B and C). While the replication kinetics of the STAT1blind virus were similar to that of the parental wild-type virus throughout, the cell-associated virus titers of the STAT2blind virus and to a lesser extent the mda5blind virus were significantly lower at later time points (P < 0.05 to 0.01), even though the cytopathic effects were similar (Fig. 5B and D). These viruses and the Vko and ZBDko mutants also yielded significantly (P < 0.05 to 0.001) lower cell-free virus titers at the latest time point (Fig. 5C), suggesting that the V-protein unique region may influence directly or indirectly virus replication. However, the peak titers reached and the overall replication kinetics were within the range observed for different wild-type viruses.
CDV virulence requires inhibition of STAT2 and mda5 signaling.
To assess the importance of the V-protein-mediated inhibition of the different IFN signaling pathways in vivo, groups of six to eight ferrets were infected intranasally with each mutant virus, the wild-type virus, and the Vko virus. All animals infected with the wild-type or STAT1blind viruses developed a severe rash, high fever, and substantial weight loss and ultimately succumbed to the disease within 2 weeks after infection (Fig. 6A). In contrast, only a mild and transient disease was observed in the groups of ferrets infected with Vko or ZBDko virus. Ferrets infected with mda5blind and STAT2blind viruses presented an intermediate disease phenotype with clinical signs of various intensities. However, all animals ultimately survived the infection. Consistent with the clinical course, cell-associated viremia levels observed for the STAT1blind virus were similar to those observed for the wild-type strain (Fig. 6B). In contrast, all other V-protein mutants reached a hundred-fold-lower peak titer, and the viremia was cleared within 3 weeks. None of the viruses reverted to the wild-type sequence or accumulated additional changes in the region surrounding the original mutation (data not shown).
All viruses resulted in severe leukopenia within 7 days after infection, which resolved rapidly in animals infected with Vko, mda5/STAT2blind, or STAT2blind viruses, while progressively worsening in animals infected with lethal STAT1blind or wild-type strains (Fig. 6C). Despite the survival of all animals infected with the mda5blind virus, leukocyte numbers remained reduced until the end of this study at 35 days postinfection. Similarly, an inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation was observed in all groups during the acute infection stages, with the exception of the Vko-infected animals (Fig. 6D). The values remained low in the animals infected with the lethal viruses and recovered only slowly in the mda5 and combined STAT2/mda5blind groups. In contrast, lack of interference with STAT2-mediated IFN signaling resulted in a rapid recovery of proliferation activity.
STAT1blind virus remains virulent despite reduced control of type I IFN responses in vivo.
Lethal CDV infections in ferrets are characterized by complete inhibition of cytokine responses (26). To assess whether the loss of type I and II IFN signaling interference observed in vitro alters the IFN induction profile in vivo, we analyzed the IFN mRNA levels in PBMCs 3 days after infection. Consistent with our previous findings, ferrets infected with the parental wild-type strain were unable to upregulate type I and II IFN mRNAs, while the group infected with Vko virus mounted a vigorous response (22) (Fig. 7A to C, WT and Vko columns). All viruses that carried V proteins with mutations that selectively abolished their ability to interfere with one of the IFN signaling pathways resulted in an intermediate phenotype (Fig. 7A to C). IFN-γ induction in these animals was less homogeneous, with some animals responding strongly and others showing inhibition similar to that of the group infected with wild-type virus (Fig. 7C). While the STAT1blind mutant retained wild-type virulence despite its reduced ability to prevent IFN induction in PBMCs 3 days postinfection, the STAT2blind, mda5blind, and ZBDko viruses that also had reduced ability to prevent IFN induction were attenuated. This suggests that virus-host interactions in other cells, or downstream IFN signaling events, must influence disease outcome.
DISCUSSION
Morbillivirus V-protein-mediated interference with innate immune activation has been the focus of intense study over the last years. It is now clear that V protein inhibits the nuclear translocation of STAT1 and STAT2, thereby interfering with type I and II IFN-mediated transcriptional activation (16, 28, 30). In addition, V protein inhibits mda5 signaling (19). Naturally occurring mutations and systematic screening have identified the region around residue Y110 as essential for STAT1 interactions (6, 14, 31) and have highlighted the importance of regions R233-E235 and W240-W250 in the V-protein unique region for mda5 signaling interference and STAT2 binding, respectively (6, 8). Independent of these in vitro mechanistic analyses, the importance of the V protein for virulence has been demonstrated in different animal models (20, 22, 32), and a STAT1blind virus displayed a Vko phenotype in rhesus macaques (21). However, the relative importance of the V-protein interactions with the different IFN signaling pathways for virulence and innate immune response control remained to be determined. We present here such an analysis based on infection of ferrets with a lethal CDV strain. Surprisingly, we found that loss of the ability to interfere with STAT1 signaling had no effect on the severity of immunosuppression and the outcome of the infection in ferrets, even though this virus was unable to prevent activation of type I and II IFN transcription in PBMCs.
Control of STAT2 and mda5-mediated signaling is critical for morbillivirus virulence.
RNA virus infections are first detected by the intracellular RNA sensors RIG-I and mda5, triggering the transcription of IFN-β, which in turn initiates a signaling cascade that ultimately leads to phosphorylation of tyrosine residues in STAT molecules and their nuclear translocation (33). The best-characterized IFN signaling pathway involves the binding of phosphorylated STAT1/2 molecules to interferon regulatory factor 9 (IRF9), which leads to the formation of interferon-stimulated gene factor 3 (ISGF3) and subsequent transcription of ISRE-controlled genes (34). In addition, other mechanisms of signaling exist, and there is increasing evidence that STAT1, STAT3, STAT4, STAT5, and STAT6 homodimers, as well as STAT1/3, STAT1/4, STAT1/5, STAT2/3 and STAT5/6 heterodimers also engage in signal transduction (35, 36). Furthermore, interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) cannot be induced upon stimulation with IFN in an ISRE-dependent manner in the presence of p38 inhibitors (37), indicating that STAT-independent signaling via p38 and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) contributes significantly to IFN-mediated transcription initiation (35). Altogether, these in vitro and knockout mouse studies suggest that several different pathways of interferon signaling are operative, but it is not yet known which are more relevant for the control of virulence in natural hosts. We observed that functional inactivation of V-protein-meditated inhibition of STAT2- or mda5-mediated signaling results in attenuation, demonstrating that interference at several key points in the innate immune recognition pathway is necessary for the virus to achieve full control.
Minor role of STAT1 signaling in host response to CDV.
The increased susceptibility of STAT1ko mice, and of patients with genetic defects in STAT1, to many viral diseases illustrates its importance in the activation of the host response to infections (38, 39). Together with an earlier report that MeV inhibits the maturation of SLAM-expressing STAT2ko but not STAT1ko murine dendritic cells (40), our observation that the inhibition of STAT1-mediated signaling has little effect on CDV virulence in ferrets indicates that the STAT1 signaling pathway plays only a minor role in the control of these infections in a natural host. However, a similarly constructed STAT1blind measles virus was attenuated in rhesus macaques (21). The relative importance of the interactions of the V proteins of morbilliviruses with the immune defenses of different hosts may thus vary.
V-protein interference with additional signaling or effector proteins and disease severity.
We observed that all viruses with IFN signaling interference-deficient V proteins partially lost their competence to control IFN activation in ferret PBMCs, but only the STAT1blind CDV retained wild-type virus-like virulence. It is conceivable that early CDV interactions with macrophages and dendritic cells of the respiratory tract determine disease outcome, as these cells were found to be infected during early MeV infection stages (41). These professional antigen-presenting cells rapidly express high levels of type I IFNs upon exposure of Toll-like receptors to single-stranded RNA (42). The MeV V protein inhibits this pathway by competing with IRF7 for phosphorylation (43), and high structural and functional conservation suggests that the CDV V protein has similar activity.
Differences in the interference of the mutants with downstream IFN signaling may also contribute to disease outcome. While small amounts of type I or II IFN can be sufficient to trigger the expression of ISGs (33), there are several positive- and negative-feedback loops to adapt the level of expression to the respective situation (44, 45). It is conceivable that V protein interacts with certain groups of ISGs in a yet unknown manner and that these interactions may modulate virulence. Identification and characterization of these candidate additional V-protein targets may thus be needed to fully understand the multifaceted interaction between morbilliviruses and the host's immune system.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The p125-Luc plasmid was a kind gift of Georg Kochs at the Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Freiburg, Germany, and the mda5 and RIG-I expression plasmids were generously provided by Manoj Krishnan at the Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School. We thank all laboratory members for continuing support and lively discussions.
This work was supported by CIHR grant MOP66989, funding from the German Ministry of Health, and a Duke-NUS Signature Research Program start-up grant (funded by the Agency for Science, Technology and Research of Singapore and the Ministry of Health of Singapore) to V.V.M., NIH grant R01 AI063476 to R.C., Armand-Frappier Foundation fellowships to N.S. and C.G., a postdoctoral fellowship by the German Research Foundation (DFG; GE2325/1-1) to I.G., funding from the Helmholtz-Alberta Initiative-Infectious Diseases Research (HAI-IDR) to E.G., and funding from the Helmholtz Virtual Institute VISTRIE (Viral Strategies of Immune Evasion) to M.D.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print 26 December 2013
REFERENCES
- 1.Schneider-Schaulies S, Schneider-Schaulies J. 2009. Measles virus-induced immunosuppression. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 330:243–269 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.von Pirquet CE. 1908. Das Verhalten der kutanen Tuberkulinreaktion während der Masern. Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr. 30:1297–1300 [Google Scholar]
- 3.Moss WJ, Griffin DE. 2006. Global measles elimination. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4:900–908. 10.1038/nrmicro1550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Abramson O, Dagan R, Tal A, Sofer S. 1995. Severe complications of measles requiring intensive care in infants and young children. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 149:1237–1240. 10.1001/archpedi.1995.02170240055008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dollimore N, Cutts F, Binka FN, Ross DA, Morris SS, Smith PG. 1997. Measles incidence, case fatality, and delayed mortality in children with or without vitamin A supplementation in rural Ghana. Am. J. Epidemiol. 146:646–654. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009330 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Caignard G, Bourai M, Jacob Y, Tangy F, Vidalain PO. 2009. Inhibition of IFN-alpha/beta signaling by two discrete peptides within measles virus V protein that specifically bind STAT1 and STAT2. Virology 383:112–120. 10.1016/j.virol.2008.10.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Childs K, Stock N, Ross C, Andrejeva J, Hilton L, Skinner M, Randall R, Goodbourn S. 2007. mda-5, but not RIG-I, is a common target for paramyxovirus V proteins. Virology 359:190–200. 10.1016/j.virol.2006.09.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ramachandran A, Parisien JP, Horvath CM. 2008. STAT2 is a primary target for measles virus V protein-mediated alpha/beta interferon signaling inhibition. J. Virol. 82:8330–8338. 10.1128/JVI.00831-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Thomas SM, Lamb RA, Paterson RG. 1988. Two mRNAs that differ by two nontemplated nucleotides encode the amino coterminal proteins P and V of the paramyxovirus SV5. Cell 54:891–902. 10.1016/S0092-8674(88)91285-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cattaneo R, Kaelin K, Baczko K, Billeter MA. 1989. Measles virus editing provides an additional cysteine-rich protein. Cell 56:759–764. 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90679-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Li T, Chen X, Garbutt KC, Zhou P, Zheng N. 2006. Structure of DDB1 in complex with a paramyxovirus V protein: viral hijack of a propeller cluster in ubiquitin ligase. Cell 124:105–117. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.10.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Paterson RG, Leser GP, Shaughnessy MA, Lamb RA. 1995. The paramyxovirus SV5 V protein binds two atoms of zinc and is a structural component of virions. Virology 208:121–131. 10.1006/viro.1995.1135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lamb RA, Parks GD. 2013. Paramyxoviridae: the viruses and their replication, p 957–995 In Knipe DM, Howley PM. (ed), Fields virology, 6th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ohno S, Ono N, Takeda M, Takeuchi K, Yanagi Y. 2004. Dissection of measles virus V protein in relation to its ability to block alpha/beta interferon signal transduction. J. Gen. Virol. 85:2991–2999. 10.1099/vir.0.80308-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Devaux P, von Messling V, Songsungthong W, Springfeld C, Cattaneo R. 2007. Tyrosine 110 in the measles virus phosphoprotein is required to block STAT1 phosphorylation. Virology 360:72–83. 10.1016/j.virol.2006.09.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rothlisberger A, Wiener D, Schweizer M, Peterhans E, Zurbriggen A, Plattet P. 2010. Two domains of the V protein of virulent canine distemper virus selectively inhibit STAT1 and STAT2 nuclear import. J. Virol. 84:6328–6343. 10.1128/JVI.01878-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Andrejeva J, Childs KS, Young DF, Carlos TS, Stock N, Goodbourn S, Randall RE. 2004. The V proteins of paramyxoviruses bind the IFN-inducible RNA helicase, mda-5, and inhibit its activation of the IFN-beta promoter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101:17264–17269. 10.1073/pnas.0407639101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Childs KS, Andrejeva J, Randall RE, Goodbourn S. 2009. Mechanism of mda-5 inhibition by paramyxovirus V proteins. J. Virol. 83:1465–1473. 10.1128/JVI.01768-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ramachandran A, Horvath CM. 2010. Dissociation of paramyxovirus interferon evasion activities: universal and virus-specific requirements for conserved V protein amino acids in MDA5 interference. J. Virol. 84:11152–11163. 10.1128/JVI.01375-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Devaux P, Hodge G, McChesney MB, Cattaneo R. 2008. Attenuation of V- or C-defective measles viruses: infection control by the inflammatory and interferon responses of rhesus monkeys. J. Virol. 82:5359–5367. 10.1128/JVI.00169-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Devaux P, Hudacek AW, Hodge G, Reyes-Del Valle J, McChesney MB, Cattaneo R. 2011. A recombinant measles virus unable to antagonize STAT1 function cannot control inflammation and is attenuated in rhesus monkeys. J. Virol. 85:348–356. 10.1128/JVI.00802-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.von Messling V, Svitek N, Cattaneo R. 2006. Receptor (SLAM [CD150]) recognition and the V protein sustain swift lymphocyte-based invasion of mucosal tissue and lymphatic organs by a morbillivirus. J. Virol. 80:6084–6092. 10.1128/JVI.00357-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.von Messling V, Springfeld C, Devaux P, Cattaneo R. 2003. A ferret model of canine distemper virus virulence and immunosuppression. J. Virol. 77:12579–12591. 10.1128/JVI.77.23.12579-12591.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.von Messling V, Milosevic D, Cattaneo R. 2004. Tropism illuminated: lymphocyte-based pathways blazed by lethal morbillivirus through the host immune system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101:14216–14221. 10.1073/pnas.0403597101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Anderson DE, von Messling V. 2008. Region between the canine distemper virus M and F genes modulates virulence by controlling fusion protein expression. J. Virol. 82:10510–10518. 10.1128/JVI.01419-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Svitek N, von Messling V. 2007. Early cytokine mRNA expression profiles predict Morbillivirus disease outcome in ferrets. Virology 362:404–410. 10.1016/j.virol.2007.01.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schmittgen TD, Zakrajsek BA, Mills AG, Gorn V, Singer MJ, Reed MW. 2000. Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction to study mRNA decay: comparison of endpoint and real-time methods. Anal. Biochem. 285:194–204. 10.1006/abio.2000.4753 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Palosaari H, Parisien JP, Rodriguez JJ, Ulane CM, Horvath CM. 2003. STAT protein interference and suppression of cytokine signal transduction by measles virus V protein. J. Virol. 77:7635–7644. 10.1128/JVI.77.13.7635-7644.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Parisien JP, Bamming D, Komuro A, Ramachandran A, Rodriguez JJ, Barber G, Wojahn RD, Horvath CM. 2009. A shared interface mediates paramyxovirus interference with antiviral RNA helicases MDA5 and LGP2. J. Virol. 83:7252–7260. 10.1128/JVI.00153-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chinnakannan SK, Nanda SK, Baron MD. 2013. Morbillivirus V proteins exhibit multiple mechanisms to block type 1 and type 2 interferon signalling pathways. PLoS One 8:e57063. 10.1371/journal.pone.0057063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bankamp B, Fontana JM, Bellini WJ, Rota PA. 2008. Adaptation to cell culture induces functional differences in measles virus proteins. Virol. J. 5:129. 10.1186/1743-422X-5-129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Valsamakis A, Schneider H, Auwaerter PG, Kaneshima H, Billeter MA, Griffin DE. 1998. Recombinant measles viruses with mutations in the C, V, or F gene have altered growth phenotypes in vivo. J. Virol. 72:7754–7761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Haller O, Kochs G, Weber F. 2006. The interferon response circuit: induction and suppression by pathogenic viruses. Virology 344:119–130. 10.1016/j.virol.2005.09.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.van Boxel-Dezaire AH, Rani MR, Stark GR. 2006. Complex modulation of cell type-specific signaling in response to type I interferons. Immunity 25:361–372. 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.08.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Platanias LC. 2005. Mechanisms of type-I- and type-II-interferon-mediated signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 5:375–386. 10.1038/nri1604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kallal LE, Biron CA. 2013. Changing partners at the dance: variations in STAT concentrations for shaping cytokine function and immune responses to viral infections. JAKSTAT 2(1):e23504. 10.4161/jkst.23504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Uddin S, Majchrzak B, Woodson J, Arunkumar P, Alsayed Y, Pine R, Young PR, Fish EN, Platanias LC. 1999. Activation of the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase by type I interferons. J. Biol. Chem. 274:30127–30131. 10.1074/jbc.274.42.30127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Najjar I, Fagard R. 2010. STAT1 and pathogens, not a friendly relationship. Biochimie 92:425–444. 10.1016/j.biochi.2010.02.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Boisson-Dupuis S, Kong XF, Okada S, Cypowyj S, Puel A, Abel L, Casanova JL. 2012. Inborn errors of human STAT1: allelic heterogeneity governs the diversity of immunological and infectious phenotypes. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 24:364–378. 10.1016/j.coi.2012.04.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hahm B, Trifilo MJ, Zuniga EI, Oldstone MB. 2005. Viruses evade the immune system through type I interferon-mediated STAT2-dependent, but STAT1-independent, signaling. Immunity 22:247–257. 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.01.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lemon K, de Vries RD, Mesman AW, McQuaid S, van Amerongen G, Yuksel S, Ludlow M, Rennick LJ, Kuiken T, Rima BK, Geijtenbeek TB, Osterhaus AD, Duprex WP, de Swart RL. 2011. Early target cells of measles virus after aerosol infection of non-human primates. PLoS Pathog. 7:e1001263. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001263 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bao M, Liu YJ. 2013. Regulation of TLR7/9 signaling in plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Protein Cell 4:40–52. 10.1007/s13238-012-2104-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pfaller CK, Conzelmann KK. 2008. Measles virus V protein is a decoy substrate for IkappaB kinase alpha and prevents Toll-like receptor 7/9-mediated interferon induction. J. Virol. 82:12365–12373. 10.1128/JVI.01321-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Marié I, Durbin JE, Levy DE. 1998. Differential viral induction of distinct interferon-alpha genes by positive feedback through interferon regulatory factor-7. EMBO J. 17:6660–6669. 10.1093/emboj/17.22.6660 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sato M, Hata N, Asagiri M, Nakaya T, Taniguchi T, Tanaka N. 1998. Positive feedback regulation of type I IFN genes by the IFN-inducible transcription factor IRF-7. FEBS Lett. 441:106–110. 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)01514-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]