Dr P. Katsinelos’ letter contributes substantially to the discussion on the safety of injection sclerotherapy for peptic ulcer bleeding. Although sclerosant-induced vascular thrombosis can lead to wall necrosis and free perforation, previously published series as well as our study, do not report any occurrence of free perforation with the use of ethanolamine [1-3]. In our Department, one perforation has occurred after the completion of more than 200 procedures. This case was a second attempt to treat recurrent bleeding from a large duodenal ulcer with increased volumes of ethanolamine. Thus we could advise against the use of large ethanolamine volumes (>2 mL) for hemostasis of duodenal ulcers. Taken together, the above data indicate that perforation probably occurs in much lower frequencies than the 3-4%, reported with the use of multipolar electrocoagulation and heater probe [4,5].
The efficacy of combination injection regimens has been challenged by a small number of early studies that included inadequate numbers of patients to establish superiority over epinephrine monotherapy [2]. However, the superiority of combination injection regiments has been highlighted by a number of meta-analyses [6,7], and acknowledged in the most recent consensus recommendation on the management of patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding [8]. Our work is the first to have included enough patients to demonstrate superiority of the combination of ethanolamine and epinephrine injection therapy over the injection of epinephrine alone for at least one of the study outcomes [3].
Since awareness is considered the cornerstone of safety, Dr Katsinelos’ case report has already served its purpose. However, existing literature data as well as our presented study indicate that ethanolamine with epinephrine injection therapy represents a safe and efficacious alternative whenever safer methods like APC or hemoclips are either unavailable or difficult to apply [3,9].
Biography
“G. Gennimatas” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest: None
References
- 1.Rajgopal C, Palmer KR. Endoscopic injection sclerosis: effective treatment for bleeding peptic ulcer. Gut. 1991;32:727–729. doi: 10.1136/gut.32.7.727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Choudari CP, Palmer KR. Endoscopic injection therapy for bleeding peptic ulcer; a comparison of adrenaline alone with adrenaline plus ethanolamine oleate. Gut. 1994;35:608–610. doi: 10.1136/gut.35.5.608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Konstantinidis A, Valatas V, Ntelis V, et al. Endoscopic treatment for high-risk bleeding peptic ulcers: a comparison of epinephrine alone with epinephrine plus ethanolamine. Ann Gastroenterol. 2011;24:101–107. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Laine L. Multipolar electrocoagulation versus injection therapy in the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers. A prospective, randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 1990;99:1303–1306. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(90)91154-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chung SC, Leung JW, Sung JY, et al. Injection or heat probe for bleeding ulcer. Gastroenterology. 1991;100:33–37. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(91)90579-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Marmo R, Rotondano G, Piscopo R, et al. Dual therapy versus monotherapy in the endoscopic treatment of high-risk bleeding ulcers: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:279–289. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.01023.x. quiz 469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Vergara M, Calvet X, Gisbert JP. Epinephrine injection versus epinephrine injection and a second endoscopic method in high risk bleeding ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;18:CD005584. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005584.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Barkun AN, Bardou M, Kuipers EJ, et al. International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:101–113. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-2-201001190-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Peng YC, Chen SY, Tung CF, et al. Factors associated with failure of initial endoscopic hemoclip hemostasis for upper gastrointestinal bleeding. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40:25–28. doi: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000190754.25750.c0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]