Abstract
Objective
Oesophagitis might result from the effects of chemokines produced by oesophageal cells in response to gastro-oesophageal reflux, and not solely from the direct, caustic effects of refluxed gastric juice. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can block chemokine production through mechanisms independent of their antisecretory effects. We studied omeprazole effects on chemokine production by oesophageal epithelial cells exposed to acidic bile salts.
Design
Human primary and telomerase-immortalised oesophageal squamous cells were exposed to acidic bile salt medium with or without omeprazole pretreatment. Interleukin (IL)-8 expression was determined by RT-PCR and ELISA. IL-8 promoter activity was measured by luciferase reporter assay. Binding of NF-κB and AP-1 subunits to the IL-8 promoter was assessed by ChIP assay. Immune cell migration induced by conditioned medium was determined by a double-chamber migration assay system.
Results
Acidic bile salt medium caused oesophageal epithelial cells to express IL-8 mRNA and protein by activating the IL-8 promoter through NF-κB and AP-1 binding. Omeprazole inhibited that acidic bile salt-stimulated IL-8 expression by blocking the nuclear translocation of p65 (an NF-κB subunit) and by blocking the binding of p65, c-jun and c-fos (AP-1 subunits) to the IL-8 promoter. Omeprazole also blocked the ability of conditioned medium from cells exposed to acidic bile salts to induce immune cell migration.
Conclusions
In oesophageal squamous epithelial cells, omeprazole inhibits IL-8 expression through effects on NF-κB and AP-1 that are entirely independent of effects on gastric acid secretion. These previously unrecognized PPI effects might contribute to the healing of reflux oesophagitis.
Introduction
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most effective medications available for the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), and PPIs are considered the medical therapy of choice for erosive reflux oesophagitis.1 The proton pump inhibitors are so named because they inhibit H+,K+ ATPase, the “proton pump” of the parietal cell that is responsible for gastric acid secretion. It has been assumed widely that gastric acid inhibition is the only important beneficial action of the PPIs. According to this prevailing notion, PPIs heal reflux oesophagitis solely because they decrease the production of gastric acid, which reduces acid reflux, which prevents acid-peptic damage to the oesophagus. However, PPIs have been found to have a number of anti-inflammatory actions that are independent of their effects on gastric acid secretion.2 In human gastric cancer cells and human umbilical vein epithelial (HUVEC) cells, for example, PPIs inhibit the production of chemokines including interleukin (IL)-8, which is a major mediator of inflammation.3 PPIs also decrease adhesion molecule production by endothelial and inflammatory cells4–7 and, in oesophageal squamous cells from patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis, we have shown that PPIs inhibit the production of eotaxin-3 (a chemokine that attracts eosinophils) stimulated by exposure to Th2 cytokines.8;9 Conceivably, such anti-inflammatory effects of PPIs might contribute to their beneficial actions in GORD.
Another traditional notion about GORD that might be incorrect is that reflux oesophagitis is the direct result of a caustic, chemical injury inflicted on the oesophagus by refluxed gastric acid. According to this traditional notion, reflux oesophagitis begins with acid and pepsin attacking and destroying squamous cells at the oesophageal luminal surface, progressing later to deeper mucosal layers as acid burns through the lining of the oesophagus.10 Our recent studies using a rat model of reflux oesophagitis have challenged this concept of GORD pathogenesis, however.11 After the surgical induction of reflux by oesophago-duodenostomy in the rat, we have shown that reflux oesophagitis starts with a lymphocytic infiltration in the oesophageal submucosa, which progresses over the course of weeks to involve the mucosal surface. We also have found that human oesophageal squamous cells exposed to an acidic bile salt medium (similar in composition to gastric juice) secrete chemokines, including IL-8, which can induce the migration of inflammatory cells.11 Based on these findings, we have proposed a new hypothesis for the development of reflux oesophagitis in which the reflux of gastric juice stimulates oesophageal squamous cells to secrete chemokines that attract inflammatory cells. According to this hypothesis, it is chemokine-mediated inflammation, not an acid burn, that initially damages the oesophageal mucosa in patients with GORD.
Noting that oesophagitis might be mediated by chemokines (like IL-8) produced by the oesophagus in response to gastro-oesophageal reflux, and that PPIs can block chemokine production through acid-independent mechanisms, we hypothesized that PPIs might interfere with reflux-stimulated chemokine production by oesophageal epithelial cells, and that this acid-independent mechanism might contribute to the efficacy of PPI therapy in GORD. To explore this hypothesis, we studied the effects of omeprazole on IL-8 secretion induced by exposure to acidic bile salts in primary oesophageal squamous epithelial cells and in telomerase-immortalised, non-neoplastic oesophageal squamous cell lines.
Materials and Methods
Patients Providing Oesophageal Biopsy Specimens for Primary Cell Cultures
These studies were approved by the Institutional Review Board on Human Studies of the Dallas VA Medical Center. Study subjects were patients scheduled for elective endoscopy who provided written, informed consent for participation. Six patients with GORD (5 men, average age 56.4±4.6 years) and 3 control subjects (all men, average age 54.3±5.4 years) who had no symptoms or endoscopic signs of oesophageal disease had biopsies taken from the distal, squamous-lined oesophagus to establish primary cell cultures as previously described.8 Briefly, primary cell cultures are established by placing oesophageal biopsy specimens essentially unaltered into culture medium. The diagnosis of GORD was based on one or any combination of the following: 1) heartburn (defined as an uncomfortable, retrosternal burning sensation relieved by acid suppression) for at least 3 months, 2) the endoscopic finding of erosive oesophagitis (Los Angeles grades A–C) and 3) long-segment Barrett’s oesophagus (defined as >3 cm of biopsy-confirmed oesophageal specialized intestinal metaplasia).
Cell Lines
We used non-neoplastic, telomerase-immortalised oesophageal squamous (NES) cell lines created from endoscopic biopsy specimens of the distal oesophagus from two patients who had GORD with Barrett’s oesophagus (NES-B3T, NES-B10T) and from two who had GORD without Barrett’s oesophagus (NES-G2T, NES-G4T).12;13 All experiments involved only oesophageal squamous cells, not Barrett’s columnar cells. We also used immune cell lines, which included a human T-cell line (Jurkat) and a human neutrophil line (HL-60 promyelocytic leukemia cells differentiated with dimethyl sulfoxide) (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) as previously described (Supplemental Methods).11;14;15
Acidic Bile Salt Exposure and Omeprazole Treatment
For individual experiments, NES cell lines and primary oesophageal squamous cells were cultured either in neutral medium (pH 7.2) alone or in neutral medium with periodic exposures to acidic medium (pH 4.0) containing a mixture of conjugated bile acids (glycocholic acid, glycodeoxycholic acid [both from Calbiochem, San Diego, CA], taurocholic acid, glycochenodeoxycholic acid, taurochenodeoxycholic acid, and taurodeoxycholic acid [Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO] in a 20:6:3:15:3:1 molar concentration, total concentration 400 µM) designed to simulate gastric refluxate found in patients with GORD and Barrett’s oesophagus.16;17 Neutral or acidic bile salt medium was added for 10 minutes, three times a day, for a total of 5 days unless otherwise indicated. These exposure durations were chosen to simulate typical episodes of gastro-oesophageal reflux.18 We used omeprazole at a concentration of 35 µM (gift of AstraZenca R&D, Molndal, Sweden and also purchased commercially from Sigma8;9, St. Louis, MO), which was added to the medium overnight after the third and the fourth day of acidic bile salt treatment.
For experiments using chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and IL-8 promoter activity assays to evaluate subunit binding to the IL-8 promoter, cell lines were treated with acidic bile salt or control medium for 24 hours, with or without 24 hours of pretreatment by omeprazole in neutral pH medium. After pretreatment, the neutral medium was removed and replaced with either control medium (with omeprazole) or acidic bile salt medium (pH 5.5 with omeprazole) for the duration of the experiment.
Semi-quantitative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
Semiquantitative PCR was performed for IL-8 and GAPDH mRNAs in NES cell lines and primary esophageal squamous cells after day 5 of acidic bile salt exposure (Supplemental Methods).
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for IL-8
We performed ELISA of conditioned medium from NES cells collected the morning after each day of exposure for 5 days, using commercially available ELISA kits (R&D Systems) to assess production of IL-8 (Supplemental Methods).
IL-8 Promoter Activity Assays
For transfection studies, we used plasmid constructs containing the −162/+44 fragment of the human IL-8 promoter cloned into pGL3 upstream of a luciferase reporter (−162/+44 hIL-8/Luc), and −162/+44 hIL-8/Luc containing point mutations in the NF-κB and AP-1 DNA binding sites (ΔNF-κB 162/+44 hIL-8/Luc and ΔAP-1 162/+44 hIL-8/Luc; all plasmids were the generous gift of Dr. Marc Hershenson, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI); pGL-3 Basic Luciferase Vector (Promega, Madison, WI) lacking the IL-8 promoter insert served as a control.19 The renilla reporter pRL (Promega) plasmid was used to equalize for transfection efficiency. Data were expressed as relative light units for firefly luciferase normalized to renilla luciferase (Supplemental Methods).
Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Fractionation and Western Blot
For p65, c-jun, and c-fos, NES cell lines were exposed to acidic bile salt or control medium for 2 hours with or without omeprazole pretreatment for 24 hours. The medium was removed and the cells were washed in cold phosphate-buffered saline. Nuclear extracts were isolated from cell lines using the NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL) per the manufacturer’s instructions. Proteins were separated by SDS- polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and incubated with primary antibodies to total and phospho-p65, c-jun, c-fos, tubulin, and TF-IID (Supplemental Methods).
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) Assay
NES cell lines were treated with acidic bile salt or control medium for 24 hours with or without omeprazole pretreatment, and a ChIP assay was performed as previously described (Supplemental Methods).12
Immune Cell Migration
We used a transwell system in which immune cells loaded into one chamber were observed to migrate into another. For each cell line, 5× 105 cells were placed in the upper chamber of 24-well dual chamber culture plates separated by a polycarbonate coated membrane with 5.0 µm pores (Corning, Lowell, MA). The immune cell lines were serum starved overnight. Conditioned media from NES-G4T and NES-B10T cells treated with 4 or 5 days of neutral or acidic bile salt medium with and without omeprazole were added to the lower chamber as a chemotactic reagent. Immune cells were loaded into the upper chamber. After a 3-hour incubation at 37°C, the upper chamber was removed and cells in the lower chamber were collected and counted.
Data Analyses
Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical analyses were performed using a paired or unpaired Student’s t-test with the Instat for Windows statistical software package (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). For multiple comparisons, an ANOVA and the Student-Newman-Keuls multiple-comparisons test was performed using the Instat for Windows statistical software package (GraphPad). P values ≤ 0.05 were considered significant for all analyses.
Results
Acidic Bile Salts Induce IL-8 Secretion in Oesophageal Squamous Cell Lines from GORD Patients with and without Barrett’s Oesophagus
In earlier studies, we had demonstrated that acidic bile salts increased IL-8 secretion in NES-B3T and NES-B10T oesophageal squamous cell lines, which are derived from patients with Barrett’s oesophagus.11 Now, we exposed the NES-G2T and NES-G4 squamous cell lines (derived from patients who had GORD without Barrett’s oesophagus) to acidic bile salts, and determined IL-8 secretion over 5 days. As in the NES-B3T and NES-B10T cell lines11, we found minimal baseline secretion of IL-8 in NES-G2T and NES-G4T (Figure 1). Also like the squamous cells from Barrett’s patients, acidic bile salt exposure significantly increased IL-8 secretion after 1 and 2 days in NES-G2T and NES-G4T, respectively, and IL-8 secretion continued to increase through day 5 (Figure 1). Thus, acidic bile salts induce IL-8 secretion in oesophageal squamous cell lines from GORD patients, irrespective of whether they have Barrett’s oesophagus.
Figure 1.

Oesophageal squamous cell lines from patients who have GORD without Barrett’s esophagus (NES-G2T and NES-G4T) increase IL-8 protein secretion following exposure to acidic bile salt medium. The bar graphs depict the mean + SEM of at least 2 individual experiments. (*, p<0.05 compared to corresponding control; **, p<0.01 compared to corresponding control; ***, p<0.001 compared to corresponding control)
Acidic Bile Salts Induce IL-8 Secretion in Primary Oesophageal Squamous Cells from GORD Patients
We next studied IL-8 secretion in response to acidic bile salt exposure in primary oesophageal squamous cells from 2 patients who had GORD without Barrett’s oesophagus (NES-G1, NES-G2), and from 4 patients who had GORD with Barrett’s oesophagus (NES-B3, NES-B6, NES-B7, NES-B10). We found that acidic bile salt exposure significantly increased IL-8 secretion in all of the primary cells up to day 5, with wide variation among cells in IL-8 secretion levels (Figure 2). These finding suggest that acidic bile salts increase IL-8 secretion in oesophageal squamous cells from patients with GORD, with considerable variation among individuals in their levels of stimulated IL-8 secretion.
Figure 2.

Primary oesophageal squamous (NES) cells from 6 GORD patients all demonstrate increases in IL-8 protein secretion following exposure to acidic bile salt medium. The bar graphs depict the mean + SEM of at least 2 individual experiments. (&, p<0.05 compared to corresponding control; ++, p<0.01 compared to corresponding control; ***, p<0.001 compared to corresponding control)
Omeprazole Blocks Acidic Bile Salt-Induced IL-8 Secretion in Oesophageal Squamous Cells and Cell Lines from GORD Patients
We next explored effects of omeprazole on IL-8 protein secretion in oesophageal squamous cell lines and primary squamous cell cultures. In preliminary studies, we found that treatment with omeprazole alone had no apparent effect on the low levels of baseline secretion of IL-8 in oesophageal squamous cells (data not shown). We treated cells with acidic bile salt medium alone for 3 days, and then added omeprazole to the acidic bile salt medium for days 4 and 5. In all four NES cell lines, omeprazole significantly decreased IL-8 secretion in conditioned media on days 4 and 5 (Figure 3 A–D). In the primary oesophageal squamous cells, omeprazole caused a decrease in the mean level of IL-8 secretion on days 4 and 5, but the decrease achieved statistical significance only on day 4 (Figure 3 E&F).
Figure 3.

Omeprazole (Ome) blocks IL-8 protein secretion induced by acidic bile salt medium in NES cell lines and primary NES cells. (A) NES-B10T, (B) NES-B3T, (C) NES-G4T, and (D) NES-G2T were exposed to acidic bile salt medium (A&B) for 4 or 5 days in the presence or absence of omeprazole. Data are the mean +SEM of 2 separate experiments. (***, p≤ 0.001 compared to corresponding control;###, p≤ 0.001 compared to corresponding A&B stimulation alone) (E) Primary NES cells from 6 patient with GORD exposed to A&B for 4 days or (F) for 5 days in the presence or absence of omeprazole. Horizontal line in each column represents the mean for all 6 patients.
Omeprazole Blocks Acidic Bile Salt-Induced IL-8 Secretion in Oesophageal Squamous Cells from Control Subjects without Oesophageal Disease
To determine if PPI inhibition of acidic bile salt-stimulated cytokine production is a feature limited to the diseased oesophagus of GORD patients, we studied the effects of omeprazole on IL-8 protein secretion in primary oesophageal squamous cells from 3 control subjects without oesophageal disease (NES-N1, NES-N2, NES-N3). As in the GORD cells, exposure to acidic bile salts significantly increased IL-8 secretion at days 4 and 5 in all 3 control cells, and omeprazole significantly decreased that IL-8 secretion (Figure 4).
Figure 4.

Omeprazole (Ome) blocks IL-8 protein secretion induced by acidic bile salt medium in primary oesophageal squamous cells from control subjects without oesophageal disease. (A) NES-N1, (B) NES-N2, and (C) NES-N3 were exposed to acidic bile salt medium (A&B) for 4 or 5 days in the presence or absence of omeprazole. Data are the mean +SEM of 2 separate experiments. (*, p<0.05 compared to corresponding control; ***, p≤ 0.001 compared to corresponding control;##, p≤ 0.01 compared to corresponding A&B stimulation alone;###, p≤ 0.001 compared to corresponding A&B stimulation alone)
Omeprazole Suppresses Acidic Bile Salt-Stimulated IL-8 mRNA Expression and Promoter Activation in Oesophageal Squamous Cells and Cell Lines from GORD Patients
We next explored the mechanisms underlying how omeprazole blocks acidic bile salt-stimulated IL-8 protein secretion. To determine whether omeprazole affected acidic bile salt-induced IL-8 transcriptional regulation, RT-PCR was performed to evaluate IL-8 mRNA expression in all 4 NES cell lines and in the 5 primary cell cultures that demonstrated decreased IL-8 protein secretion with omeprazole in acidic bile salt medium. Compared to cells stimulated with acidic bile salts alone, omeprazole caused a significant decrease in IL-8 mRNA levels for all NES cell lines (Figure 5A) and primary cells (Figure 5B).
Figure 5.


Omeprazole (Ome) decreases IL-8 mRNA expression induced by acidic bile salt medium in (A) NES cell lines and (B) primary NES cells. NES cell lines and primary NES cells were exposed to acidic bile salt media (A&B) for 5 days in the presence or absence of omeprazole (35 µM). Numbers represent normalized densitometric values. Depicted is of one of 2 separate experiments.
Using cell lines, we next determined whether acidic bile salts activate the IL-8 promoter in NES cells. We transiently transfected the cells using the −162/+44 hIL-8/Luc promoter. After stimulation with acidic bile salts for 24 hours, all 4 NES cells exhibited significantly increased IL-8 promoter activity (Figure 6 A–D). We next treated NES-B10T and NES-G4T cells with acidic bile salts in the presence of omeprazole. We found that omeprazole alone had no effect on IL-8 promoter activity. Compared to cells stimulated with acidic bile salts alone, we found a significant decrease in IL-8 promoter activity in NES cell lines treated with omeprazole (Figure 6 E&F).
Figure 6.


Acidic bile salt medium (A&B) increases IL-8 promoter activity by activating NF-κB and AP-1 binding sites in NES cell lines. (5A–D) Site-directed mutagenesis of the NF-κB binding site (ΔNF-κB hIL-8) or the AP-1 binding site (ΔAP-1 hIL-8) within the reporter construct pGL3-162/+44 hIL-8/Luc prevents activation of the IL-8 promoter in all 4 cell lines. (5E–F) Omeprazole (Ome) decreases activation of the IL-8 promoter by exposure to acidic bile salt media in (E) NES-G4T and (F) NES-B10T cells. The bar graphs depict the mean + SEM of at least 2 individual experiments. (***, p<0.001 compared with corresponding controls;+++, p<0.001 compared with corresponding acidic bile salt media-treated controls) RLU, relative light units.
The NF-κB and AP-1 DNA Binding Sites Are Necessary for Acidic Bile Salt-Stimulated IL-8 Promoter Activation in Oesophageal Squamous Cell Lines
A number of studies have demonstrated that the NF-κB DNA binding site in the IL-8 promoter is essential for transcriptional regulation of the gene (Reviewed in20). The core IL-8 promoter also contains an activating protein (AP)-1 binding site that is not needed for transcriptional activation in some cells, but that contributes importantly to IL-8 promoter activation in others.20 We have previously shown that acidic bile salts induce signaling via the NF-κB and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways in oesophageal squamous cells.12;21 Therefore, we sought to determine the contribution of NF-κB and AP-1 transcription factors in the acidic bile salt-induced expression of IL-8. The −162/+44 fragment of the IL-8 promoter contains DNA binding sites for NF-κB and AP-1. To determine if the NF-κB and the AP-1 sites are necessary for IL-8 transcriptional activation in response to acidic bile salts, we transfected NES cell lines with ΔNF-κB 162/+44 hIL-8/Luc, which contains a point mutation in the NF-κB site, or with ΔAP-1 162/+44 hIL-8/Luc, which contains a point mutation in the AP-1 site. Point mutation of the NF-ΔB or AP-1 binding sites abolished IL-8 promoter activation in response to acidic bile salts (Figure 6A–D). These findings suggest that NF-κB and AP-1 binding are essential for IL-8 promoter induction in response to acidic bile salts in oesophageal squamous cells.
Omeprazole Decreases Acidic Bile Salt-Stimulated Nuclear Translocation of p65, and Decreases the Binding of p65, c-jun, and c-fos to the IL-8 Promoter in Oesophageal Squamous Cell Lines
Nuclear translocation and DNA binding are essential for transcription factors to activate the IL-8 promoter.20 Therefore, we explored whether omeprazole interfered with the ability of p65 (an NF-κB subunit), c-jun and c-fos (both AP-1 subunits) to undergo nuclear translocation and binding to the IL-8 promoter in acidic bile salt-stimulated NES cells. In untreated control cells, phospho- and total p65 is found predominantly in the cytoplasm, with lesser amounts in the nucleus (Figure 7A). ChIP assay demonstrates that the p65 protein binds to the IL-8 promoter (Figure 7B). Omeprazole alone had minimal effects on baseline cytoplasmic and nuclear levels of phospho- and total p65 (Figure 7A). Stimulation with acidic bile salts decreased cytoplasmic levels of phospho-and total p65 and markedly increased both nuclear levels and binding of p65 to the IL-8 promoter; these effects were decreased markedly by treatment with omeprazole (Figure 7 A&B). In untreated control cells, c-jun and c-fos are located both in the cytoplasm and nucleus, with baseline binding to the IL-8 promoter demonstrated by ChIP assay (Figure 7 A&B). Omeprazole alone had minimal effects on baseline cytoplasmic and nuclear expression of c-jun and c-fos (Figure 7A). Stimulation with acidic bile salts decreased cytoplasmic levels of c-jun and c-fos, and increased the nuclear levels and binding of both of these AP-1 subunits to the IL-8 promoter (Figure 7 A&B). Western blot revealed no differences in acidic bile salt-induced cytoplasmic and nuclear expression of c-jun and c-fos between omeprazole treated and untreated NES cells (Figure 7A). In contrast, omeprazole reduced binding of acidic bile salt-stimulated c-jun and c-fos to the IL-8 promoter to control levels (Figure 7B). These findings suggest that omeprazole inhibits nuclear translocation of p65, but not c-jun or c-fos, and prevents binding of p65, c-jun, and c-fos to the IL-8 promoter in oesophageal squamous cells.
Figure 7.


Omeprazole (Ome) decreases acidic bile salt-induced (A&B) nuclear translocation of p65, but not of c-jun or c-fos in NES cells. Representative experiments of Western blotting for (A) phospho- and total p65 and c-jun and c-fos in cytoplasmic lysates and in nuclear lysates in NES-G4T and NES-B10T cells. Tubulin and TF-IID served as controls for the cytoplasmic and nuclear lysates, respectively. (B) Omeprazole (Ome) decreases acidic bile salt-induced p65, c-jun, and c-fos binding to the endogenous IL-8 promoter in NES-G4T and NES-B10T cells. Panels show representative experiments of ChIP assays for p65, c-jun, and c-fos. Isotype matched IgG served as a negative control. Numbers represent normalized densitometric values. C, untreated control cells
Omeprazole Treatment of Oesophageal Squamous Cell Lines Exposed to Acidic Bile Salts Blocks the Ability of the Cells’ Conditioned Medium to Induce Immune Cell Migration
In earlier studies, we demonstrated that conditioned medium of oesophageal squamous cells treated with acidic bile salts induced migration of neutrophils and T cells, and that IL-8 in the conditioned medium contributed to that migration.11 In the present study, we found that omeprazole significantly decreased IL-8 secretion into conditioned medium of oesophageal squamous cells exposed to acidic bile salts. We also determined whether omeprazole treatment of NES cells exposed to acidic bile salts affected the ability of conditioned medium to induce immune cell migration. As in our earlier studies, we found that conditioned medium from NES-B10T cells exposed to acidic bile salts for 4 and 5 days significantly increased migration rates of T cells and neutrophils (Figure 8 A&B). Treatment with omeprazole significantly decreased that acidic bile salt-induced rise in immune cell migration rates (Figure 8 A&B).
Figure 8.

Migration rate of (A) T cells and (B) Neutrophils after exposure to conditioned medium (CM) collected from NES-B10T cells on day 4 in controls and on days 4 and 5 after exposure to acidic bile salt medium (A&B) in the presence or absence of omeprazole. The bar graphs depict the mean + SEM of at least 2 individual experiments. (***, p<0.001 compared to corresponding control; +, p<0.05 compared to corresponding CM day 4 A&B without omeprazole;++, p<0.01 compared to corresponding CM day 4 A&B without omeprazole;&&, p<0.01 compared to corresponding CM day 5 A&B without omeprazole;&&&, p<0.001 compared to corresponding CM day 5 A&B without omeprazole)
Discussion
We have shown that exposure to acidic bile salt medium causes primary oesophageal squamous cells and telomerase-immortalised oesophageal squamous cell lines to secrete IL-8, a chemokine that is a major mediator of inflammation. We have found that omeprazole blocks this IL-8 secretion by suppressing activation of the IL-8 promoter, which decreases IL-8 mRNA expression stimulated by acidic bile salts. We have demonstrated that acidic bile salts activate the IL-8 promoter through NF-κB and AP-1 DNA binding sites, and that omeprazole both blocks nuclear translocation of p65 (an NF-κB subunit) and decreases binding of p65, c-jun and c-fos (AP-1 subunits) to the IL-8 promoter. Finally, we have shown that omeprazole treatment of oesophageal squamous cells exposed to acidic bile salts blocks the ability of the cells’ conditioned medium to induce immune cell migration. These previously unknown PPI actions, which are entirely independent of effects on gastric acid secretion, might contribute to the beneficial effects of PPIs in the treatment of GORD. Further studies will be needed to establish that this acid-independent, anti-inflammatory effect can be achieved with the lower concentrations of omeprazole typically found in the blood of patients who take the drug.
Oesophageal mucosal biopsies from patients with reflux oesophagitis exhibit elevated levels of a number of pro-inflammatory cytokines in addition to IL-8 (e.g. IL-1β, interferon-γ, IL-6, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, RANTES),22–24 and it is possible that PPIs might interfere with the oesophageal expression of these other cytokines. We chose to focus on IL-8 (also called CXCL8)25 because it is known to be an important mediator of acute and chronic inflammation in a number of organs26–28, and because IL-8 appears to play a key role in mediating reflux oesophagitis.11;29 Studies have documented IL-8 production by oesophageal epithelial cells in animal models of reflux oesophagitis11;30, in human oesophageal cell lines3;11, and in oesophageal mucosal biopsy specimens from patients with erosive and non-erosive reflux disease.23;31;32
IL-8 functions to attract and activate polymorphonuclear cells and lymphocytes, and oesophageal levels of IL-8 correlate with the severity of reflux oesophagitis.23;31;32 GORD treatment with PPIs causes a decrease in oesophageal mucosal IL-8 expression levels23;31, but it is not clear whether those levels decline merely because PPIs cause the healing of oesophagitis through their well-known antisecretory effects, or because PPIs exert direct suppressive effects on oesophageal IL-8 production. The observation that oesophageal mucosal IL-8 levels fall after successful anti-reflux surgery (without PPIs) suggests that the healing of oesophagitis alone can cause IL-8 levels to decline.24 Our study showing that PPIs can block reflux-induced activation of the IL-8 promoter in oesophageal epithelial cells suggests that this acid-independent effect of PPIs, along with their antisecretory effects, might contribute to the healing of reflux oesophagitis.
Pro-inflammatory stimuli known to increase IL-8 production also are known to activate protein kinases that modulate the activities of nuclear factor (NF)-κB and activator protein (AP)-1.20 These transcription factors regulate a number of key biological processes and, interestingly, NF-κB and AP-1 also appear to modulate each other’s expression.33 Yoshida et al. reported that human oesophageal epithelial cells transfected with luciferase expression vectors bearing mutations at the binding sites for either NF-κB or AP-1 exhibited suppression of bile salt-stimulated IL-8 gene transcription by 100% and 70%, respectively.34 Handa et al. found that omeprazole and lansoprazole blocked the stimulated secretion of IL-8 by human gastric cancer and HUVEC cells, in part by preventing NF-κB activation.3
To explore effects of acidic bile salts on IL-8 promoter activity, we transfected oesophageal cell lines using IL-8 promoters with or without mutations at the NF-κB or AP-1 binding sites. We confirmed that the acidic bile salt-induced increase in IL-8 promoter activity is dependent on NF-κB and AP-1 activation. We found that omeprazole blocked nuclear translocation of the p65 subunit of NF-κB, and reduced its binding to the IL-8 promoter. Omeprazole also interfered with binding of AP-1 subunits (c-jun and c-fos) to the IL-8 promoter. Taken together, these findings suggest that PPIs prevent acidic bile salt-induced, pro-inflammatory stimuli from increasing IL-8 secretion in oesophageal epithelial cells by blocking nuclear translocation of p65, and by preventing binding of p65, c-jun, and c-fos to the IL-8 promoter. Gene promoter blocking effects of omeprazole are not unprecedented. In our recent studies using oesophageal epithelial cells from patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis, we found that omeprazole inhibited Th2 cytokine-stimulated secretion of eotaxin-3 by blocking STAT6 binding to the eotaxin-3 promoter through effects on chromatin remodeling.9
To explore possible functional effects of omeprazole-induced inhibition of chemokine production on the inflammatory response to gastrooesophageal reflux, we used a double-chamber migration assay system to determine the ability of conditioned medium from oesophageal cells treated with acidic bile salts (with and without omeprazole pretreatment) to induce immune cell migration. We found that conditioned medium from oesophageal squamous cells exposed to acidic bile salts caused a significant increase in migration of neutrophils and T cells, and that this increased immune cell migration was blocked by treating the oesophageal squamous cells with omeprazole. It is not clear whether this resulted solely from the omeprazole-induced decrease in secretion of IL-8 by the oesophageal squamous cells, or from effects of omeprazole on cell secretion of other chemokines.
In conclusion, we have shown that omeprazole inhibits IL-8 secretion stimulated by exposure to acid and bile salts in oesophageal epithelial cells. We have demonstrated that acidic bile salts activate the IL-8 promoter through NF-κB and AP-1 DNA binding sites, and that omeprazole inhibits IL-8 production by blocking nuclear translocation of p65 and by decreasing binding of p65, c-jun and c-fos to the IL-8 promoter. All of these omeprazole effects are entirely independent of effects on gastric acid secretion. Thus, we have demonstrated a novel mechanism that might contribute to the beneficial effects of PPIs in the healing of GORD.
Supplementary Material
Significance of the study.
What is already known about this subject?
It has been assumed widely that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) heal gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) solely because they inhibit gastric acid secretion.
Recent studies suggest that reflux oesophagitis might not result solely from the direct, caustic effects of refluxed acid on oesophageal epithelial cells, but rather from the effects of chemokines such as interleukin (IL)-8 produced by those cells in response to the gastro-oesophageal reflux of acid and bile.
PPIs have a number of potential anti-inflammatory actions that are independent of their effects on gastric acid secretion, including the ability to inhibit chemokine production in certain epithelial cells.
What are the new findings?
Cultures of primary and telomerase-immortalised, non-neoplastic oesophageal squamous cells exposed to acidic bile salts secrete IL-8, which is a major mediator of inflammation.
Omeprazole blocks that acidic bile salt-stimulated IL-8 secretion in oesophageal squamous cells by blocking nuclear translocation of p65 (an NF-κB subunit) and by decreasing binding of p65, c-jun and c-fos (AP-1 subunits) to the IL-8 promoter.
Omeprazole pretreatment blocks the ability of conditioned medium from oesophageal squamous cells exposed to acidic bile salts to induce immune cell migration.
How might it impact on clinical practice in the foreseeable future?
We have demonstrated anti-inflammatory effects of PPIs that are entirely independent of their effects on gastric acid secretion, and that might contribute to the beneficial effects of PPIs in the treatment of GORD.
These findings suggest a potential role for chemokine-directed therapies in the treatment of GORD.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Office of Medical Research, Departments of Veterans Affairs (R.F.S., S.J.S., D.H.W.), VISN 17 Start-Up Award (Q.Z.), the National Institutes of Health (R01-DK63621 to R.F.S., R01-CA134571 to R.F.S. and S.J.S., K12 HD-068369-01 to E.C.), the American Gastroenterological Association Institute (Fellow to Faculty Transition Award to E.C.) and NASPGHAN Foundation/AstraZeneca Award (E.C.)
Abbreviations
- IL-8
Interleukin-8
- NF-κB
Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells
- AP-1
Activating protein -1
- NES
Normal oesophageal squamous
- GORD
Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease
- PCR
Polymerase chain reaction
- ELISA
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
- ChIP
Chromatin immunoprecipitation
- SEM
Standard error of the mean
Footnotes
Financial Disclosures: No conflicts of interest exist for any of the authors.
Contributorship Statement:
All authors included on this paper fulfill the criteria of authorship and have approved the submission of this manuscript. Specific contributions are as follows:
Huo: study design; technical and material support; analysis and interpretation of data; critical revision of manuscript; important intellectual content; drafting of manuscript
X Zhang, X: study design; technical and material support; analysis and interpretation of data; important intellectual content
Yu: technical and material support; important intellectual content
Q Zhang: technical and material support; important intellectual content
Cheng: technical and material support; important intellectual content
Wang: technical and material support; important intellectual content
Pham: technical and material support; important intellectual content
Spechler: study concept; analysis and interpretation of data; critical revision of manuscript; important intellectual content
Souza: study concept/design; analysis and interpretation of data; critical revision of manuscript; important intellectual content; drafting of manuscript
The Corresponding Author has the right to grant on behalf of all authors and does grant on behalf of all authors, a non-exclusive licence (government employees) on a worldwide basis to the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and its Licensees to permit this article (if accepted) to be published in Gut editions and any other BMJPGL products to exploit all subsidiary rights, as set out in our licence.
Reference List
- 1.Katz PO, Gerson LB, Vela MF. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:308–328. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kedika RR, Souza RF, Spechler SJ. Potential anti-inflammatory effects of proton pump inhibitors: a review and discussion of the clinical implications. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54:2312–2317. doi: 10.1007/s10620-009-0951-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Handa O, Yoshida N, Fujita N, et al. Molecular mechanisms involved in anti-inflammatory effects of proton pump inhibitors. Inflamm Res. 2006;55:476–480. doi: 10.1007/s00011-006-6056-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yoshida N, Yoshikawa T, Tanaka Y, et al. A new mechanism for anti-inflammatory actions of proton pump inhibitors--inhibitory effects on neutrophilendothelial cell interactions. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;14(Suppl 1):74–81. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2000.014s1074.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yoshida K, Kyo E, Tsuda T, et al. EGF and TGF-alpha, the ligands of hyperproduced EGFR in human esophageal carcinoma cells, act as autocrine growth factors. Int J Cancer. 1990;45:131–135. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910450124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sasaki T, Yamaya M, Yasuda H, et al. The proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole inhibits rhinovirus infection in cultured human tracheal epithelial cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 2005;509:201–210. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2004.12.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ohara T, Arakawa T. Lansoprazole decreases peripheral blood monocytes and intercellular adhesion molecule-1-positive mononuclear cells. Dig Dis Sci. 1999;44:1710–1715. doi: 10.1023/a:1026604203237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cheng E, Zhang X, Huo X, et al. Omeprazole blocks eotaxin-3 expression by oesophageal squamous cells from patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis and GORD. Gut. 2013;62:824–832. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang X, Cheng E, Huo X, et al. Omeprazole blocks STAT6 binding to the eotaxin-3 promoter in eosinophilic esophagitis cells. PLoS One. 2012;7:e50037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Livstone EM, Sheahan DG, Behar J. Studies of esophageal epithelial cell proliferation in patients with reflux esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 1977;73:1315–1319. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Souza RF, Huo X, Mittal V, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux might cause esophagitis through a cytokine-mediated mechanism rather than caustic acid injury. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:1776–1784. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.07.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Huo X, Zhang HY, Zhang XI, et al. Acid and bile salt-induced CDX2 expression differs in esophageal squamous cells from patients with and without Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:194–203. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.03.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang HY, Zhang X, Chen X, et al. Differences in activity and phosphorylation of MAPK enzymes in esophageal squamous cells of GERD patients with and without Barrett's esophagus. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2008;295:G470–G478. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.90262.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hauert AB, Martinelli S, Marone C, et al. Differentiated HL-60 cells are a valid model system for the analysis of human neutrophil migration and chemotaxis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2002;34:838–854. doi: 10.1016/s1357-2725(02)00010-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ohsaka A, Hirota-Komatsu S, Shibata M, et al. Specific association of increased vascular endothelial growth factor expression and its receptors with macrophage differentiation of HL-60 leukemia cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;368:543–549. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.01.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Liu T, Zhang X, So CK, et al. Regulation of Cdx2 expression by promoter methylation, and effects of Cdx2 transfection on morphology and gene expression of human esophageal epithelial cells. Carcinogenesis. 2007;28:488–496. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgl176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kauer WK, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, et al. Composition and concentration of bile acid reflux into the esophagus of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surgery. 1997;122:874–881. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6060(97)90327-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Richter JE, Bradley LA, DeMeester TR, et al. Normal 24-hr ambulatory esophageal pH values. Influence of study center, pH electrode, age, gender. Dig Dis Sci. 1992;37:849–856. doi: 10.1007/BF01300382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shimotake TK, Izhar FM, Rumilla K, et al. Interleukin (IL)-1 beta in tracheal aspirates from premature infants induces airway epithelial cell IL-8 expression via an NF-kappa B dependent pathway. Pediatr Res. 2004;56:907–913. doi: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000145274.47221.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hoffmann E, Dittrich-Breiholz O, Holtmann H, et al. Multiple control of interleukin-8 gene expression. J Leukoc Biol. 2002;72:847–855. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Souza RF, Shewmake KL, Shen Y, et al. Differences in ERK Activation in Squamous Mucosa in Patients Who Have Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease with and without Barrett's Esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:551–559. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41122.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fitzgerald RC, Onwuegbusi BA, Bajaj-Elliott M, et al. Diversity in the oesophageal phenotypic response to gastro-oesophageal reflux: immunological determinants. Gut. 2002;50:451–459. doi: 10.1136/gut.50.4.451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Isomoto H, Wang A, Mizuta Y, et al. Elevated levels of chemokines in esophageal mucosa of patients with reflux esophagitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:551–556. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07303.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Oh DS, DeMeester SR, Vallbohmer D, et al. Reduction of interleukin 8 gene expression in reflux esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus with antireflux surgery. Arch Surg. 2007;142:554–559. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.142.6.554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bacon K, Baggiolini M, Broxmeyer H, et al. Chemokine/chemokine receptor nomenclature. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2002;22:1067–1068. doi: 10.1089/107999002760624305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Luster AD. Chemokines--chemotactic cytokines that mediate inflammation. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:436–445. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199802123380706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Furie MB, Randolph GJ. Chemokines and tissue injury. Am J Pathol. 1995;146:1287–1301. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mukaida N. Pathophysiological roles of interleukin-8/CXCL8 in pulmonary diseases. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2003;284:L566–L577. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00233.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Naito Y, Yoshida N, Yoshikawa T. Pro-inflammatory chemokine IL-8 in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Nihon Rinsho. 2004;62:1447–1453. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yamaguchi T, Yoshida N, Tomatsuri N, et al. Cytokine-induced neutrophil accumulation in the pathogenesis of acute reflux esophagitis in rats. Int J Mol Med. 2005;16:71–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Isomoto H, Saenko VA, Kanazawa Y, Nishi Y, et al. Enhanced expression of interleukin-8 and activation of nuclear factor kappa-B in endoscopy-negative gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:589–597. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04110.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Monkemuller K, Wex T, Kuester D, Fry LC, et al. Interleukin-1beta and interleukin-8 expression correlate with the histomorphological changes in esophageal mucosa of patients with erosive and non-erosive reflux disease. Digestion. 2009;79:186–195. doi: 10.1159/000211714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fujioka S, Niu J, Schmidt C, et al. NF-kappaB and AP-1 connection: mechanism of NF-kappaB-dependent regulation of AP-1 activity. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:7806–7819. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.17.7806-7819.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yoshida N, Imamoto E, Uchiyama K, et al. Molecular mechanisms involved in interleukin-8 production by normal human oesophageal epithelial cells. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24:219–226. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

