Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 4.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Commun (Camb). 2014 Feb 4;50(9):1104–1106. doi: 10.1039/c3cc47705c

Orbital Contributions to CO Oxidation in Mo-Cu Carbon Monoxide Dehydrogenase

Benjamin W Stein a, Martin L Kirk a,*
PMCID: PMC3959894  NIHMSID: NIHMS555084  PMID: 24322538

Abstract

A molecular orbital analysis provides new insight into the mechanism of Mo/Cu carbon monoxide dehydrogenase, and reveals electronic structure contributions to reactivity that are remarkably similar to the structurally related molybdenum hydroxylases. A calculated reaction barrier of ~12 kcal/mol is in excellent agreement with experiment.


The carbon monoxide dehydrogenase (CODH) from Oligotropha carboxidovorans and Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava possess a μ-sulfido bridged heterobinuclear Mo/Cu active site.15 This unique Mo/Cu CODH is a member of the xanthine oxidase (XO) family of pyranopterin molybdenum enzymes that typically catalyse the oxidative hydroxylation of N-heterocyle and aldehyde substrates6, 7. In marked contrast to XO, CODH catalysesthe oxidation of CO to CO2 according to

CO+H2OCO2+2e-+2H+

with the Mo ion cycling between the Mo(VI) and Mo(IV) oxidation states. The Cu ion remains at the Cu(I) oxidation level throughout the catalytic sequence2. A recent kinetic study of CODH2 showed that the activation energy for CO oxidation is 11.4 kcal/mol at pH 7. Of particular note is the lack of a CO concentration dependence on the kinetic parameters. This suggests that CO binding to the enzyme is rapid, followed by a slower substrate oxidation step. Support for CO binding directly to the Cu(I) center derives from recent 13C and 63,65Cu ENDOR studies of a paramagnetic Mo(V)/Cu(I) intermediate state trapped during reduction of the enzyme by CO.8

DFT computations 9, 10 suggest that the CO carbon present in the Mo(VI)/Cu(I)-CO complex formed after substrate binding is susceptible to nucleophilic attack by a metal activated water (Mo=O/Mo-OH) to yield a cyclic μ22 CO2 bridged intermediate (1) (Figure 1). Intermediate 1 has been proposed to undergo a large geometric rearrangement to form a very stable C-S bonded intermediate (2) (Figure 1). The stability of 2 leads to large computed reaction barriers for the formation of the reduced Mo(IV)/Cu(I) cluster and oxidized product9. Support for intermediate 2 in the catalytic cycle is based upon x-ray crystallographic studies of an n-butylisocyanide inhibited form of CODH3 that also possesses a C-S bond. Interestingly, EPR and ENDOR spectroscopic studies of the related XO enzyme reveal the presence of an enzyme-substrate C-S bond in an inhibited XO enzyme form (aldehyde inhibited XO) obtained under turnover conditions with certain aldehydes.6, 11, 12 In light of the inhibitory nature of C-S bond formation in both XO and CODH, we wondered whether the formation of highly covalent enzyme-substrate C-S bonds is a necessary condition for catalysis in CODH. We thought it possible that the elimination of stable C-S bonded structures such as 2 (Figure 1) would lead to reduced activation barriers for CO oxidation and minimal geometric changes at the active site during catalysis. We begin with an electronic description of the cyclic μ22 CO2 bridged intermediate 1, which is believed to occur prior to C-S bond formation and is common to all currently proposed mechanisms. This provides a convenient starting point for understanding electronic structure contributions to catalysis in CODH, particularly with respect to small molecule activation and the avoidance of stable intermediates that possess covalent C-S bonds.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

a) Cyclic μ22 CO2 bridged intermediate, 1, suggested by computational studies probing the reaction coordinate of CODH. b) Inhibited-type structure with stable C-S bond, 2.

The structure of putative intermediate 1 possesses a bent μ22 CO2 molecule that bridges the Mo and Cu ions. This structure is remarkably similar to that proposed for the transmetallated product of Aresta’s complex using organozinc reagents13, where a bent CO2 molecule is bound μ22 to a heterobinuclear transition metal cluster and activated for nucleophilic attack at carbon. While the CO2 oxygens are weak Lewis bases, the carbon center is electrophilic. Thus, Cu(I) → CO2 charge donation (back bonding) results in partial occupation of the degenerate CO2 LUMOs (Figure 2), and this will drive a Renner-Teller14 (R-T) distortion to a bent (C2v), geometry. Structural changes that result from orbital charge transfer between small molecules and transition metals have recently been shown to be a key component in the activation of these ligands15. With respect to intermediate 1, the effect of the R-T distortion is to break the degeneracy of the CO2 LUMOs leading to the in-plane (ip; a1) LUMO being stabilized relative to the out-of-plane (b1) LUMO. This bending also results in a LUMO(a1) orbital with a directional sp hybridized carbon center. Thus, R-T induced bending of CO2 in 1 may activate the coordinated CO2 in 1 for nucleophilic attack at carbon.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

LUMOs of linear (left) and bent (right) CO2. Note the stabilization of the in-plane a1 MO upon bending.

Both the HOMO and LUMO of 1 possess CO2 LUMO(a1) character, highlighting the importance of the CO2 LUMO(a1) in the reactivity of 1 (Figure 3). These highly delocalized orbitals are consistent with the results of EPR and computational studies on CODH models, which show a high degree of Mo-S-Cu covalency.16 The HOMO of 1 clearly shows the key Cu(I) → CO2 σ-type charge donation that leads to CO2 bending and activation for nucleophilic attack. The CO2 LUMO(a1) character present in the LUMO of 1 indicates that 1 possesses an activated CO2 molecule that is subject to nucleophilic attack by a water or hydroxide at the active site. The LUMO of 1 also has considerable Mo-S π* character that demonstrates that the Mo ion is not fully reduced. In fact, the occupied Mo character in the HOMO is only ~30%, compared to ~60% for the computed fully reduced Mo(IV) form, vide infra. A natural bond orbital (NBO17, 18) analysis of 1 supports this partially reduced character, and further reveals 1 to be an approximate 1:1 resonance hybrid of Mo(VI) and Mo(IV) structures arising from C-Cu σ → Mo-S π* charge donation and Mo-S π → C-Cu σ* donation (Figure 4 A–D). The NBO description of the bonding in 1 is remarkably similar to what we previously observed in CODH related XO11 (Figure 4). Specifically, the XO intermediate formed by nucleophillic attack of a metal activated water on the carbonyl carbon of aldehyde substrates possesses an analogous combination of C-H σ → Mo-S π* and Mo-S π → C-H σ* charge donations. These two donor-acceptor interactions in XO lead to the resonance structures in Figure 4B. The similar donor-acceptor interactions in these XO and CODH intermediates underscore their importance in C-H and CO2 activation, respectively.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

DFT calculated frontier molecular orbitals of 1. Left: HOMO, right: LUMO. Note the CO2 LUMO(ip) character in both of these orbitals.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(A) Resonance structures that contribute to the ground state of cyclic intermediate 1. (B) Resonance structures that contribute to the ground state of the corresponding XO intermediate. (C) Principle NBOs involved in Cu-C σ -> Mo-S π* delocalization. (D) Principal NBOs involved in Mo-S π → Cu-C σ * delocalization.

The x-ray structure of CODH shows a water molecule weakly associated with the Cu(I) ion at a Cu(I)-O distance of 2.4Å3. With respect to the potential for Cu(I) to activate a water molecule by lowering its pKa, we computed the reaction coordinate for nucleophilic attack of hydroxide and water on the activated μ22 CO2 carbon centre of 1-OH and 1-OH2. Hydroxide attack proceeds through a single TS to yield a fully reduced Mo(IV)-product complex with a low activation barrier (ΔG of 12 kcal/mol), and the Mo(IV)-bicarbonate product complex (1-P) is stabilized relative to 1-OH with a ΔG of -2 kcal/mol. Water attack on the μ22 CO2 carbon centre of 1-OH2 results in the formation of carbonic acid with a ΔG of 22 kcal/mol. Thus, activation of a water molecule may contribute up to 10 kcal/mol toward TS stabilization in this process. The CODH active site contains an active site glutamate residue (Glu 763) that is rigorously conserved in XO. Glu 763 is only 3.7Å from the Cu(I) site, and may further activate a water molecule associated with Cu(I) for nucleophilic attack on the μ22 CO2 carbon centre to yield the Mo-bound bicarbonate product species. Glu 763 may also play an important role in the coupled electron-proton transfer steps necessary to convert Mo(IV)-OH2 to Mo(VI)=O in the electron transfer (oxidative) half reaction of the catalytic cycle19.

Conclusions

A reaction mechanism (Figure 5) may now be proposed for CODH that initially involves nucleophilic attack of a Mo=O oxo on the carbon center of Cu(I)-CO, resulting in a 5-membered cyclic intermediate (1) that can bind HO/H2O to yield 1-OH. This is followed by a second nucleophilic attack on the activated μ22 CO2 carbon centre of 1-OH to yield a Mo(IV)-bicarbonate product complex, 1-P. This second nucleophilic attack is suggested based on our electronic structure description of intermediate 1, which possesses a bent and activated CO2 bound to the Mo and Cu ions. The low energy barrier (ΔG = 12 kcal/mol) calculated for hydroxide attack on 1-OH is in excellent agreement with the experimentally determined value of 11.4 kcal/mol. Previous computational work9, 10 based on the x-ray structure an n-butylisocyanide inhibited form of the enzyme3 suggested the presence of a very stable intermediate (structure 2 in Figure 1) that possesses a C-S bond. These earlier calculations showed that breakdown of intermediate structure 2 occurs with a larger activation energy, and this is likely due to the inhibitory nature of C-S bond formation in XO family enzymes11.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Proposed catalytic cycle for CODH that avoids formation of a stable C-S bonded intermediate.

Although CODH and XO oxidize very different substrates (CO vs. purine heterocycles and aldehydes), we observe a remarkable electronic structure similarity for proposed intermediates that directly contribute to CO2 and C-H bond activation, respectively. In XO, the combination of C-H σ → Mo-S π* and Mo-S π → C-H σ* charge donation contributes to lowering the activation barrier for C-H bond cleavage that is coupled to Mo reduction11. In CODH we have shown that strikingly similar donor-acceptor interactions are operative, with C-Cu σ → Mo-S π* charge donation and Mo-S π → C-Cu σ* donation contributing to CO2 activation and partial reduction of Mo. We anticipate that this work will stimulate further discussion and provide the impetus for new experimental studies directed toward unravelling the remarkable chemistry associated with this unique CODH heterobimetallic active site.

Supplementary Material

ESI

Acknowledgments

M.L.K. acknowledges the National Institutes of Health (GM 057378) for generous support of this work.

Footnotes

Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: Details regarding molecular orbital, natural bond orbital, and transition state calculations. See DOI: 10.1039/c000000x/

Notes and references

  • 1.Kirk ML, Stein B. In: Comprehensive Inorganic Chemistry II. 2. Reedijk J, Poeppelmeier K, editors. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 2013. pp. 263–293. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhang B, Hemann CF, Hille R. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:12571. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.076851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dobbek H, Gremer L, Kiefersauer R, Huber R, Meyer O. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:15971–15976. doi: 10.1073/pnas.212640899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dobbek H, Gremer L, Meyer O, Huber R. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:8884–8889. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.16.8884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dobbek H. Coord Chem Rev. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hille R. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2005;433:107–116. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2004.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hille R. Chem Rev. 1996;96:2757–2816. doi: 10.1021/cr950061t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shanmugam M, Wilcoxen J, Habel-Rodriguez D, Cutsail GE, III, Kirk ML, Hoffman BM, Hille R. J Am Chem Soc. 2013 doi: 10.1021/ja406136f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hofmann M, Kassube JK, Graf T. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2005;10:490–495. doi: 10.1007/s00775-005-0661-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Siegbahn PEM, Shestakov AF. J Comput Chem. 2005;26:888–898. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sempombe J, Stein B, Kirk ML. Inorg Chem. 2011;50:10919–10928. doi: 10.1021/ic201477n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shanmugam M, Zhang B, McNaughton RL, Kinney RA, Hille R, Hoffman BM. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:14015–14017. doi: 10.1021/ja106432h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yeung CS, Dong VM. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:7826–7827. doi: 10.1021/ja803435w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bersuker IB. Electronic Structure and Properties of Transition Metal Compounds: Introduction to the Theory. Wiley; Hoboken, NJ: 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gorinchoy NN, Balan II, Bersuker IB. Comp Theor Chem. 2011;976:113–119. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gourlay C, Nielsen DJ, White JM, Knottenbelt SZ, Kirk ML, Young CG. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:2164–2165. doi: 10.1021/ja056500f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Weinhold F, Landis CR. Valency and bonding: a natural bond orbital donor-acceptor perspective. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK; New York: 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Weinhold F, Landis CR. Chem Educ Res Pract. 2001;2:91–104. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wilcoxen J, Hille R. J Biol Chem. 2013 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.522441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ESI

RESOURCES