Abstract
IscU from Escherichia coli, the scaffold protein for iron-sulfur cluster biosynthesis and delivery, populates a complex energy landscape. IscU exists as two slowly interconverting species: one (S) is largely structured with all four peptidyl–prolyl bonds trans; the other (D) is partly disordered but contains an ordered domain that stabilizes two cis peptidyl–prolyl peptide bonds. At pH 8.0, the S-state is maximally populated at 25 °C, but its population decreases at higher or lower temperatures or at lower pH. The D-state binds preferentially to the cysteine desulfurase (IscS), which generates and transfers sulfur to IscU cysteine residues to form persulfides. The S-state is stabilized by Fe–S cluster binding and interacts preferentially with the DnaJ-type co-chaperone (HscB), which targets the holo-IscU:HscB complex to the DnaK-type chaperone (HscA) in its ATP-bound from. HscA is involved in delivery of Fe–S clusters to acceptor proteins by a mechanism dependent on ATP hydrolysis. Upon conversion of ATP to ADP, HscA binds the D-state of IscU ensuring release of the cluster and HscB. These findings have led to a more complete model for cluster biosynthesis and delivery.
Keywords: Conformational equilibrium, Protein–protein interaction, Protein evolution, Iron–sulfur cluster, Peptidyl–prolyl peptide bond isomerization, Metamorphic protein
1. Introduction
Iron–sulfur (Fe–S) clusters are among the most ancient and ubiquitous protein prosthetic groups. They function in electron transport, enzymatic catalysis, chemical sensing reactions, or as structural units [1]. Cells have evolved elaborate mechanisms for producing iron–sulfur clusters so as to minimize exposure to their toxic constituents, iron and sulfur ions [2,3]. The biosynthesis of iron–sulfur clusters utilizes machinery that emerged very early in evolution and has remained highly conserved throughout biology. Humans and other eukaryotes utilize the ISC (iron–sulfur cluster) system as the essential Fe–S cluster assembly mechanism in mitochondria [4], and defects in this system have been linked to a large number of human diseases [5,6]. The prokaryotic ISC system has served as a useful model for understanding Fe–S cluster assembly and delivery [7,8]. The best-studied iron–sulfur cluster biosynthetic system is the ISC system of Escherichia coli (Fig. 1), which is highly homologous to the ISC system found in mammalian mitochondria. The IscU protein acts as a scaffold on which the Fe–S clusters are assembled and from which the clusters are delivered to various apoproteins. IscS is a PLP-dependent cysteine desulfurase that forms a heterotetrameric complex with IscU and transfers sulfane sulfur generated from the conversion of cysteine to alanine to the cluster ligand cysteines of IscU [9]. HscA and HscB, the DnaK-like chaperone and the DnaJ-like co-chaperone proteins, respectively, facilitate the Fe–S cluster delivery mechanism in an ATP-dependent manner [10]. Much of our understanding of these proteins has come from X-ray structures that have given a largely static view of the processes involved. We review here our recent studies by NMR spectroscopy and other biophysical approaches that show the importance of dynamic processes affecting these proteins, most notably IscU which we have found to populate two different conformations that interconvert on a second time scale: one conformation (S-state) is largely structured and the other (D-state) is partially dynamically disordered [11].
Fig. 1.

Representation of the Escherichia coli ISC operon and the proteins it encodes [7]. IscR is the homodimeric repressor protein [43] (34.6 kDa), which represses the operon when it contains a bound [2Fe–2S] cluster. IscS is the PLP-dependent cysteine desulfurase, which forms a homodimer (90.2 kDa) [44]. IscU is the scaffold protein for cluster assembly and transfer (13.8 kDa). The role of the IscA protein (11.6 kDa) remains controversial, although its X-ray crystal structure has been determined [45]. HscB is the DnaJ-type co-chaperone protein (20.1 kDa) that binds to holo-IscU and contains a J-domain with a conserved HPD amino acid motif that binds to the nucleotide-binding domain of HscA. HscA is the DnaK-type chaperone (65.7 kDa) that is involved in ATP-hydrolysis-driven cluster transfer. Fdx is ferredoxin (12.3 kDa) which binds a [2Fe–2S] cluster.
IscU is a highly conserved protein (Fig. 2). Conserved features include the cluster ligands and the site recognized by the chaperone (HscA). An early NMR study of Thermotoga maritime IscU suggested that it has features similar to a fluid molten globule and populates more than one state [12]. A subsequent publication revealed that T. maritime IscU exists “in a dynamic equilibrium between two or more distinct conformations, possibly existing in a molten globule state,” with the data “not fully consistent with a rigid protein fold, a molten globule state, or a completely unstructured fold” [13]. Later NMR studies reported structural heterogeneity that could be resolved by adding Zn2+ [14]. Another study characterized IscU as a ‘complex-orphan protein’ that is prone to unfolding if not stabilized by a co-factor or a protein partner [15]. We showed that apo-IscU exists in equilibrium between a structured (S) and disordered (D) state [11]. Our recent studies have revealed that the D-state consists of dynamically disordered and ordered domains, with the ordered domain stabilizing two high-energy cis peptidyl–prolyl bonds, which are trans in the S-state [16]. Thus, IscU can be classified as a metamorphic protein [17], a protein that can adopt two different folds. This raises the questions: why has IscU evolved to be metamorphic, and do the two different conformations play physiologically important roles? We have found that single-site substitutions of conserved residues perturb the equilibrium between these two states, either favoring the S- or D-state [18]. We have further found that these substitutions interfere with the rate of cluster assembly or the stability of the assembled clusters [18]. The D-state of apo-IscU is the substrate for IscS [18]. Once the cluster is assembled, the IscU-[2Fe–2S] complex adopts the S-state conformation [19]. The co-chaperone (HscB), which targets IscU-[2Fe–2S] to the chaperone (HscA), binds preferentially to the S-state of IscU [11,20]. HscA and HscA(ADP) both bind preferentially the D-state, whereas HscA(ATP) does not bind tightly to either the D- or S-state [20]. Thus, our studies show that both states of IscU are physiologically important, and we have devised a working model for iron–sulfur cluster assembly and delivery that incorporates these findings (Fig. 3) [16]. We describe the evidence for features of this model in the following sections.
Fig. 2.

Alignment of the sequences of IscU proteins from major representative species. Note that the eukaryotic IscU proteins contain an N-terminal extension that targets the protein to mitochondria. Black indicates identically conserved residues, blue conserved residues, and yellow semi-conserved residues. The orange arrows point to the conserved cysteine residues that ligate the Fe-S cluster, and the pink arrow points to the conserved histidine residue that has been shown to be the fourth ligand to a [2Fe–2S] cluster in holo-IscU [19]. The IscU residues that form the HscA recognition site [37,46] are indicated by the horizontal red arrow.
Fig. 3.
Working model for the role of IscU conformational states in the cycle of iron–sulfur cluster assembly and transfer [16,18,20]. (1) The free scaffold protein (IscU) exists in equilibrium between its two conformational states: a more structured state (S) with trans N13–P14 and P100–P101 peptide bonds and a partially disordered state (D) with cis N13–P14 and P100–P101 peptide bonds. (2) The PLP-dependent cysteine desulfurase (IscS), which catalyzes the conversion of cysteine to alanine to produce sulfane sulfur [47], preferentially binds to the D-state of IscU [18]. (3) Sulfur atoms are transferred from IscS to the cysteine side chains of IscU to form persulfides [9]; iron is then added. (4) The atoms rearrange to form a [2Fe–2S] cluster which stabilizes the S-state of IscU. (5) HscB, which preferentially binds the S-state of IscU, competes the holo-IscU off the cysteine desulfurase to form the HscB:holo-IscU complex. (6) The HPD motif in the J-domain of the co-chaperone (HscB), represented by the round knob, targets the HscB:holo-IscU complex to the nucleotide binding domain of HscA [38]. (7) An acceptor protein, represented by the blue trapezoid with four cysteinyl–SH groups approaches the complex. (8) Attack of cluster iron atoms by one or two (as shown) –SH groups liberates one or two (as shown) of the IscU cluster ligands, leading to a conformational change in HscB that activates the ATPase activity of HscA. (9) Cleavage of ATP bound to HscA to ADP leads to a conformational change [48,49] that opens up a binding site on the ligand binding domain of HscA that binds the D-state of IscU. Conversion of IscU from the S- to the D-state by binding to HscA(ADP), releases the cluster to the acceptor protein, and HscB. (9–1) Finally, exchange of bound ADP for ATP releases IscU, which then takes part in the next cycle.
2. Characterization of the two interconverting states of IscU
The initial indication for the existence of two interconverting conformational states came from the detection of two 1H–15N HSQC peaks from the side-chain 1Hε1–15Nε1 of the single Trp residue (W76) of [U-15N]-IscU (Fig. 4a). When Zn2+ was added, the Trp peak at lower frequency disappeared as did the set of largely undispersed signals (Fig. 4b). The single-site variant IscU(D39A), which is known to stabilize the cluster in holo IscU, also yielded a set of signals (Fig. 4c) similar to those of the Zn2+ complex (Fig. 4d). Thus we assigned the higher frequency Trp peak and the set of more dispersed peaks to the structured state (S) and the other set of peaks to the disordered state (D). Evidence for the interconversion of the two states came from the appearance of exchange peaks between the two states in the 1H–15N Nz-exchange spectrum (Fig. 4e) [11]. Assignments of signals from the two states indicated that the largest chemical shift differences [11] between the S- and D-states were in residues corresponding to the two N-terminal β-strands and the C-terminal α-helix of the S-state of apo-IscU [21], the Zn2+ complex [14], or the [2Fe–2S] complex [19]. We found that the D-state lacks most of the secondary structure found in the S-state [18].
Fig. 4.

Evidence from 2D 1H–15N HSQC NMR spectra that E. coli IscU exists in solution as two slowly interconverting conformational states and that the equilibrium is shifted either by zinc ion binding or by the single-site mutation D39A. (a) Spectrum of E. coli IscU. Because IscU contains only a single Trp (W76), the presence of two cross-peaks in the boxed spectral region indicates the existence of two different conformations. (b) Spectrum of E. coli IscU in the presence of 3 mM ZnCl2 (red) overlaid with the spectrum of IscU (black). Zinc binding to IscU results in the disappearance of the minor Trp side chain peak as well as the cluster of broad peaks present in the central region of the spectrum of IscU. (c) Spectrum of E. coli IscU(D39A) (green) overlaid with the spectrum of IscU (black). As with zinc binding, the D39A substitution leads to the disappearance of the minor W76 side chain signal and the cluster of broad and overlapped peaks in the central region of the spectrum of IscU. (d) Spectrum of E. coli IscU in the presence of 3 mM ZnCl2 (red) overlaid with the spectrum of E. coli IscU(D39A) (green). The close correspondence between two spectra indicates that Zn-IscU and IscU(D39A) are structurally similar. (e) Two-dimensional 1H–15N Nz-exchange spectrum of IscU. Cross-peaks assigned to W76 (green) are connected by exchange cross-peaks (red). This result demonstrates that these two peaks originate not from two covalently distinct protein species but from two interchanging conformations. Figure adapted from [11].
3. Structure of the S-state of IscU
We were able to determine the solution structure of the S-state of E. coli IscU under conditions (pH 8.0, 25 °C, 20 mM Tris buffer) where the protein is 80% S and 20% D (pdb 2L4X) [21] (Fig. 5a and b). We also determined the solution structure of IscU(D39A), which is predominantly in the S-state, (pdb 2KQK) [21] (Fig. 5c and d). The two structures are very similar except for the loops containing the residues that ligate the cluster, which are less disordered in IscU(D39A) and closer to the configuration seen in holo-IscU [19]. The fold of the S-state is similar to those of the zinc complexes of Haemophilus influenza IscU (pdb 1R9P) [14] and Mus musculus IscU (pdb 1WFZ) [22] and the structure of Aquifex aeolicus [2Fe2S]-IscU(D39A) (pdb 2Z7E) [19].
Fig. 5.
Three dimensional solution structures of the S-state of IscU and IscU(D39A) determined by NMR spectroscopy. (a) Structure of the S-state of IscU determined in the presence of ~20% D-state. The locations of the three cysteines that ligate the cluster are shown. (b) Family of models that represent the solution structure of IscU in the S-state. The N terminus is disordered as are the loops containing the cysteine cluster ligands. (c) Structure of IscU(D39A), a variant of IscU that is nearly 100% in the S-state. (d) Family of models that represent the solution structure of IscU(D39A). Note that the loops containing the cysteine cluster ligands are more ordered than in wild-type IscU. Figure adapted from [21].
4. Effects of pH and temperature on the D⇆S equilibrium
The position of the D⇆S equilibrium depends on the solution conditions. In solutions containing 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0), 0.5 mM EDTA, 5 mM DTT, 150 mM NaCl, 10% D2O, 50 μM DSS, and 50 μM NaN3, the highest level of the S-state, %S = ([S]/([S] + [D])) × 100, occurs at 25 °C (Fig. 6a) [23]. Raising or lowering the temperature leads to increased levels of the D-state. At 45 °C, the population of the S-state is near zero [16]. As the temperature is raised above 45 °C, the signals from the D-state diminish in intensity, and signals from unfolded protein increase. By 70 °C the protein is fully unfolded. These temperature-dependent conformational changes observed by NMR spectroscopy have been confirmed by differential scanning calorimetry and small angle X-ray scattering studies (J.R. Bothe and J.L. Markley, unpublished).
Fig. 6.

Temperature- and pH-dependence of the percent structured form of E. coli IscU, %S = ([S]/([S] + [D])) × 100. (a) Dependence of %S on temperature. The solution contained 1 mM IscU in a buffer consisting of 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0), 0.5 mM EDTA, 5 mM DTT, 150 mM NaCl, 10% D2O, 50 μM DSS, and 50 μM NaN3. (b) Dependence of %S on pH. The NMR sample contained 1 mM IscU, 0.5 mM EDTA, 5 mM DTT, 150 mM NaCl, 10% D2O, 50 μM DSS, and 50 μM NaN3. Figure adapted from [23].
The position of the D⇆S equilibrium also depends on pH. The S-state is favored at high pH, and the D-state is favored at low pH (Fig. 6b) [23]. The plot of log ([S]/[D]) as a function of pH has a slope of about 0.5 indicating that two protons are added in going from the S- to D-state. These results imply that two titratable residues have higher pKa values in the D-state than in the S-state. Given the midpoint of the pH dependence, we suspected that the imidazole side chains of the two histidine residues, H10 and H105, might be involved. These suspicions were confirmed by following the chemical shifts of signals from these residues as a function of pH. Signals from both H10 and H105 in the S-state showed only small chemical shift changes between pH 7 and 9, whereas signals assigned to the D-state yielded pKa values of 6.9 (H10) and 6.5 (H105) [23]. These results are particularly interesting given that H105 likely is a cluster ligand [19]. Deprotonation of H105 is required for iron binding, and conversion to the S-state puts the imidazole in the deprotonated form. Conversely, protonation of H105 in the D-state leads to release of the iron ligand. In line with these ideas, the addition of Zn2+ converts IscU fully to the S-state [11] as does the addition of Fe2+ [18].
5. Single-site amino acid substitutions perturb the D⇆S equilibrium
It has been reported that substitutions corresponding to D39A in IscU proteins from Azotobacter vinelandii [24], Aquifex aeolicus [25], Schizosaccharomyces pombe [26], and Homo sapiens [27] stabilize the cluster-coordinating complex of IscU. This substitution was used to achieve the X-ray structure of A. aeolicus [2Fe–2S]-IscU [19]. This stabilization has been attributed to a decrease in solvent accessibility of the cluster [28,29]. As noted above, we explain the effect of the mutant in terms of stabilization of the S-state of the protein which binds the cluster. We have found other substitutions that stabilize either the S-state or the D-state (Table 1). As discussed below, these mutations provide useful ways of perturbing the D⇆S equilibrium so that the distinct functional properties of the two states can be evaluated.
Table 1.
Effects of single site amino acid substitutions on the D ⇆ S equilibrium of IscU from E. coli at pH 8.0 and 25 °C.
6. Evidence for difference in peptide bond isomerizations in the S- and D-states
Given the slow interconversion rate between the S- and D-states, which both have lifetimes on the order of one second [11], we suspected that the two states might differ by the cis–trans isomerization of a peptidyl–prolyl peptide bond. E. coli IscU has prolyl residues at positions 14, 35, 100, and 101. To investigate this, we prepared a sample of E. coli IscU labeled selectively with [U-13C,15N]-proline. To aid in the assignment of the NMR signals, we also incorporated [15N]-alanine. Given identities of the residues preceding proline (N13–P14, A34–P35, and L99–P100–P101), the labeled proline served to identify signals from P100 to P101 and the labeled alanine in addition to the labeled proline served to identify P35. Signals from P14 were assigned by exclusion [16]. We used two strategies to determine the configurations of the four peptidyl–prolyl peptide bonds in the S- and D-states: analysis of chemical shifts and NOEs. Previous studies of peptidyl–prolyl cis–trans isomerization have shown that prolyl residues with cis peptide bonds typically have 13Cβ signals around 25 ppm and 13Cγ signals near 35 ppm, with (δ13Cγ − δ13Cβ) ≈ 10 ppm; conversely, prolyl residues with trans peptide bonds typically have 13Cβ signals around 27 ppm and 13Cγ signals near 32 ppm, with (δ13Cγ − δ13Cβ) ≈ 5 ppm [30–34]. In the S-state, the chemical shift difference (δ13Cγ − δ13Cβ) for all four prolyl residues was ~5 ppm, indicating that they are all trans (Fig. 7a). However, in the D-state, this chemical shift difference was ~5 ppm for P35 and P100, showing that they remain trans, but ~10 ppm for P14a and P14b (the two signals assigned to P14) and P101, indicating that they have become cis (Fig. 7b). In addition, we utilized the Promega program, which determines the statistical probability of a cis Xaa–Pro peptide bond from the sequence of the protein, the prolyl chemical shifts, and the backbone chemical shifts of neighboring residues [33]. The Promega analysis confirmed the assigned configurations for the prolyl peptide bonds at normalized likelihood values of greater than or equal to 0.99 [16]. The D-state itself exhibits local conformational heterogeneity in that two sets of signals were observed for cis P14 (P14a and P14b). The structural basis for this peak doubling currently is under investigation.
Fig. 7.
Evidence from 13C chemical shifts that all four peptidyl–prolyl peptide bonds in the S-state of IscU (stabilized by forming the Zn2+ complex at 25 °C) are trans, but that two peptidyl–prolyl peptide bonds (N13–P14 and P100–P101) are cis in the D-state (stabilized by raising the temperature to 45 °C). Shown are two-dimensional strips, taken at the chemical shifts of the prolyl 1Hα as indicated at the top of each strip, from 3D (H)CCH-TOCSY spectra of IscU acquired at 600 MHz (1H). The NMR sample contained 1 mM [U-13C, 15N-Pro]-IscU, 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0), 5 mM DTT, 150 mM NaCl, 50 μM DSS, and 50 μM NaN3 in 10% D2O. (a) Spectrum of the S-state of IscU stabilized as the Zn2+ complex at 25 °C. (b) Spectra of the D-state of IscU acquired at 45 °C. Figure from publication [16].
NOEs are also diagnostic for the configuration of a peptidyl–prolyl peptide bond. In a trans peptide bond the Hα of the preceding residue is close to the prolyl Hδ2 and Hδ3, whereas in a cis peptide bond the Hα of the preceding residue is close to the prolyl Hα. NOE studies of IscU also confirmed that the N13–P14 and P100–P101 peptide bonds are both trans in the S-state and both cis in the D-state [16].
7. Evidence for preferential protein interactions with the S- and D-states
Given that apo-IscU exists in equilibrium between two states, S and D, it was of interest to determine whether one of these states interacts preferentially with the three different proteins it encounters during cluster assembly and delivery: IscS, HscB, and HscA. We used three NMR approaches to investigate the interaction of the two states of IscU with the cysteine desulfurase (IscS) [18]: (i) we measured the effect of adding a sub-stoichiometric quantity of IscS on the S→D and D→S rates, (ii) we investigated the effect of added IscS on deuterium exchange at protected sites in the S-state of apo-IscU, and (iii) we determined the conformational state of apo-IscU in the complex with IscS. We determined the S→D and D→S rates by using two-dimensional Nz-exchange spectroscopy to measure the intensity of the exchange cross peak as a function of the exchange mixing time [35] and found that the addition of IscS increased the S→D rate and decreased the D→S rate for apo-IscU [17] (Fig. 8a). We measured the exchange of protected amide groups in IscU (both S- and D-states) by transferring 15N-labeled protein from H2O into D2O and following the decrease in intensity of two-dimensional (2D) NMR 1H–15N cross peaks as a function of time. The SOFAST NMR approach [36] enabled rapid recording of 2D spectra immediately after the solvent transfer. We found that the exchange rates of signals from IscU increased in the presence of a small amount of added IscS. In addition, when we added unlabeled E. coli IscS to [U-15N]-IscU, the 1H–15N HSQC spectrum changed to one indicative of the disordered state [18] (Fig. 8b). By repeating this experiment with variants with differing stabilities of the D and S states, we found that higher concentrations of IscS were required to convert apo-IscU variants favoring the S-state than those favoring the D-state. Taken together, these results indicate that IscS binds preferentially to the D-state of IscU. We have shown that Zn2+ binding to IscU inhibits cluster formation (Fig. 9a) and that variants that favor the S-state assemble clusters more slowly than wild-type IscU [18] (Fig. 9b). By selecting the D-state, IscS ensures that the cysteine residues of IscU are unligated by metals and available to react with the sulfur generated by the catalytic conversion of cysteine to alanine to form persulfides. With cluster formation, IscU converts to the S-state, which has a lower affinity for IscS and minimizes product inhibition.
Fig. 8.

Evidence showing that IscS binds preferentially to and stabilizes the D-state of apo-IscU. (a) Volume of the S→D (left and center for Asn26 and Glu95, respectively) or D→S (Right for Asn26) Nz-exchange cross peak divided by the volume of the diagonal S or D peak, respectively, as a function of the mixing time in a two-dimensional NMR Nz-exchange experiment. Blue symbols are for IscU alone; green symbols are for IscU plus 0.1 equiv. of IscS. From the initial slopes, the S→D exchange rate increased from 0.77 s−1 for IscU alone to 1.1 s−1 for IscU in the presence of IscS; the D→S exchange rate decreased from 2.0 s−1 for IscU alone to 1.5 s−1 for IscU in the presence of IscS. The D⇆S equilibrium constant for apo-IscU from these measurements (0.24) is consistent with the relative populations of the S and D species determined from the 2D 1H–15N HSQC peak volumes under these conditions. (b) Two-dimensional 1H–15N NMR spectrum of apo-IscU labeled uniformly with nitrogen-15 (left; red) and the spectrum of the same sample mixed with a stoichiometric amount of unlabeled IscS (Right; blue) overlaid on the spectrum of IscU alone (right, red). Figure adapted from [18].
Fig. 9.

Time course of iron–sulfur cluster assembly as monitored by absorbance at 456 nm at room temperature in an anaerobic chamber (Coy Laboratory) filled with 90% N2 and 10% H2. The cluster assembly reaction contained 50 μM apo-IscU, 1 μM IscS, 250 μM ferrous ammonium sulfate, 0.1 M Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 5 mM DTT. The reaction was initiated by adding L-cysteine to achieve a concentration of 250 μM. (a) Cluster assembly with wild-type IscU (black). Reaction in the absence of IscS (orange) showing that iron–sulfur cluster was not assembled in the absence of the cysteine desulfurase. Cluster assembly in the presence 250 μM Zn(Cl)2 (scarlet) showing that added Zn2+ inhibits cluster assembly. (b) Comparison of the time course of cluster assembly on IscU variants. Wild-type (WT) IscU assembled clusters more efficiently than the other five variants studied. The more structured variants (E111A, S107A, and N90A) assembled clusters following an initial lag and at a slower rate than WT. Like WT, the less structured variants (K89A and N90D) did not exhibit an initial lag, but they assembled clusters at rates intermediate between WT and the more structured variants. The decay of intensity after its highest point arises from the instability of the cluster once formed. Figure adapted from [18].
Addition of the cochaperone (HscB) to IscU shifts the D⇆S equilibrium to the S-state [11,20]. This property ensures that HscB selectively recognizes holo-IscU, which is in the S-state, and is not tied up binding to the D-state. The J-protein domain of HscB binds to the ATPase domain of the chaperone protein (HscA), which is involved in cluster delivery to an acceptor protein by an ATPase-dependent process. We found that, whereas addition of HscA(ATP) to IscU failed to perturb the D⇆S equilibrium, HscA(ADP) shifted the equilibrium to the D-state [20] (Fig. 10). These observations suggest that binding of the D-state requires that HscA be capable of undergoing the conformational change induced by ATP hydrolysis (Fig. 10). Our experiments were carried out with IscU, rather than holo-IscU; however, it appears clear that the binding of HscA(ADP) to the D- rather than the S-state ensures that the cluster is released irreversibly from holo-IscU. The nonapeptide of IscU that is specific for binding to the substrate binding domain of HscA (ELPPVKIHC) contains two of the cluster ligands (H105 and C106), and the X-ray structure of the complex between this peptide and the substrate binding domain showed that the cluster ligands are not in a configuration where they could bind the cluster [37].
Fig. 10.
Conformational states of IscU under conditions mimicking various steps in the iron–sulfur cluster transfer mechanism. (Left) Backbone 1H–15N NMR peaks assigned to K128 in the D- and S-states of IscU. In each panel the peak from the D-state is on the left and that from the S-state is on the right. (Top panel) [U-15N]-IscU alone; (second panel) equimolar [U-15N]-IscU and HscB; (third panel) equimolar [U-15N]-IscU, HscB and HscA(T212 V) in the presence of excess ADP; (bottom panel) equimolar [U-15N]-IscU, HscB and HscA(T212 V) in the presence of excess ATP. (Right) To the right of each panel is a schematic figure representing the step being mimicked. Figure adapted from [20].
8. Working model for iron–sulfur cluster assembly and delivery
Our model for Fe–S cluster assembly (Fig. 3) has the D-state of IscU binding to the cysteine desulfurase (IscS) and sulfur transfer to cysteine residues of IscS to form persulfides prior to the addition of iron [18]. Upon the addition of iron, the atoms arrange to form a cluster which stabilizes the S-state of IscU [19]. The co-chaperone (HscB) then competes holo-IscU off of IscS (which does not bind the S-state of IscU strongly), and the His-Pro-Asp motif of its J-domain, which binds to the nucleotide binding domain of the chaperone (HscA) [38], is responsible for forming the HscA(ATP):HscB:holo-IscU complex. Our data indicate that the HscA(ATP) complex does not have an affinity for IscU [20]. Instead, we have speculated that the trigger that initiates ATP hydrolysis and cluster release under physiological conditions, most likely is the attack of one or more free sulfhydryl groups from the acceptor proteins on the iron atoms of the cluster bound to IscU [20]. Attack of one sulfhydryl group would displace one of the IscU ligands, and the weakest ligand (H105) could be the first to be displaced. H105 could serve as an acceptor for the proton released by the attacking –SH. Protonation of H105, which favors conversion of the S- to D-state [23], could initiate a change in the conformation of the HscB:IscU complex that activates the ATPase through a change in the conformation of the bound J-domain. The change in conformation of HscA attending conversion of its bound ATP to ADP, generates the site that binds the D-state of IscU. The cluster would then be released from IscU to be bound fully by the ligands of the acceptor protein.
9. Outstanding questions and future prospects
Many questions remain concerning the detailed mechanism of iron–sulfur biosynthesis and delivery to acceptor proteins. Although the chemical exchange experiments described above suggest that the D⇆S interchange is first order, recent unpublished results from our laboratory suggest that the two prolyl peptide bond interconversions may be sequential rather than concerted. This issue requires further examination. Electrons must be donated to the sulfur produced by the cysteine desulfurase in order to reduce the sulfur to produce the persulfide bound to IscU. We are currently investigating the potential role of the ferredoxin encoded by the isc operon (Fig. 1) as the electron donor. The physiological iron donor remains a mystery to be solved. Frataxin has been suggested as the iron donor [39], but the bacterial frataxin homologue, CyaY, has been found to inhibit cluster formation [40], whereas in the human system frataxin is required for optimal cluster assembly [41,42]. Although the hypothesis that cluster delivery is triggered by attack of one or more cysteine side chains of the acceptor protein appears reasonable because it would ensure that transfer occurs only when an acceptor protein is at hand, it requires experimental verification. We also are studying yeast and human ISC proteins to determine whether they utilize similar mechanisms for iron–sulfur cluster assembly and delivery. Our preliminary investigations of the human homolog of IscU, ISCU, suggest that it is metamorphic like the E. coli protein (Kai C. and Markley J.L., unpublished).
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by US National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants R01 GM58667 and U01 GM94622 in collaboration with the National Magnetic Resonance Facility at Madison which is funded by NIH grants from the National Center for Research Resources (5P41RR002301-27 and RR02301-26S1) and the National Institute for General Medical Sciences (8P41 GM103399-27).
Abbreviations
- ADP
adenosine diphosphate
- ATP
adenosine triphosphate
- IscU
scaffold protein for Fe–S cluster biosynthesis and delivery
- HscA
DnaK-type chaperone
- HscB
DnaJ-type co-chaperone
- IscS
cysteine desulfurase
- IscU
apoform of the iron–sulfur scaffold protein
- NMR
nuclear magnetic resonance
- PLP
pyridoxal 5′-phosphate
References
- 1.Beinert H. Iron–sulfur proteins: ancient structures, still full of surprises. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2000;5:2–15. doi: 10.1007/s007750050002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Johnson DC, Dean DR, Smith AD, Johnson MK. Structure, function, and formation of biological iron–sulfur clusters. Annu Rev Biochem. 2005;74:247–281. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.082803.133518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bandyopadhyay S, Chandramouli K, Johnson MK. Iron–sulfur cluster biosynthesis. Biochem Soc Trans. 2008;36:1112–1119. doi: 10.1042/BST0361112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lill R, Muhlenhoff U. Maturation of iron–sulfur proteins in eukaryotes: mechanisms, connected processes, and diseases. Annu Rev Biochem. 2008;77:669–700. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.052705.162653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sheftel A, Stehling O, Lill R. Iron–sulfur proteins in health and disease. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2010;21:302–314. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2009.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rouault TA, Tong WH. Iron–sulfur cluster biogenesis and human disease. Trends Genet. 2008;24:398–407. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2008.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Py B, Barras F. Building Fe–S proteins: bacterial strategies. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8:436–446. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Py B, Moreau PL, Barras F. Fe–S clusters, fragile sentinels of the cell. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2011;14:218–223. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2011.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Urbina HD, Silberg JJ, Hoff KG, Vickery LE. Transfer of sulfur from IscS to IscU during Fe/S cluster assembly. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:44521– 44526. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M106907200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chandramouli K, Johnson MK. HscA and HscB stimulate [2Fe–2S] cluster transfer from IscU to apoferredoxin in an ATP-dependent reaction. Biochemistry. 2006;45:11087–11095. doi: 10.1021/bi061237w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kim JH, Füzéry AK, Tonelli M, Ta DT, Westler WM, Vickery LE, Markley JL. Structure and dynamics of the iron–sulfur cluster assembly scaffold protein IscU and its interaction with the cochaperone HscB. Biochemistry. 2009;48:6062–6071. doi: 10.1021/bi9002277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bertini I, Cowan JA, Del Bianco C, Luchinat C, Mansy SS. Thermotoga maritima IscU. Structural characterization and dynamics of a new class of metallochaperone. J Mol Biol. 2003;331:907–924. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00768-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mansy SS, Wu SP, Cowan JA. Iron–sulfur cluster biosynthesis: biochemical characterization of the conformational dynamics of Thermotoga maritima IscU and the relevance for cellular cluster assembly. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:10469–10475. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M312051200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ramelot TA, Cort JR, Goldsmith-Fischman S, Kornhaber GJ, Xiao R, Shastry R, Acton TB, Honig B, Montelione GT, Kennedy MA. Solution NMR structure of the iron–sulfur cluster assembly protein U (IscU) with zinc bound at the active site. J Mol Biol. 2004;344:567–583. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.08.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Prischi F, Pastore C, Carroni M, Iannuzzi C, Adinolfi S, Temussi P, Pastore A. Of the vulnerability of orphan complex proteins: the case study of the E. coli IscU and IscS proteins. Protein Expr Purif. 2010;73:161–166. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2010.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dai Z, Tonelli M, Markley JL. Metamorphic protein IscU changes conformation by cis–trans isomerizations of two peptidyl–prolyl peptide bonds. Biochemistry. 2012;51:9595–9602. doi: 10.1021/bi301413y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Murzin AG. Biochemistry – metamorphic proteins. Science. 2008;320:1725– 1726. doi: 10.1126/science.1158868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kim JH, Tonelli M, Markley JL. Disordered form of the scaffold protein IscU is the substrate for iron–sulfur cluster assembly on cysteine desulfurase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:454–459. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1114372109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shimomura Y, Wada K, Fukuyama K, Takahashi Y. The asymmetric trimeric architecture of [2Fe–2S] IscU: implications for its scaffolding during iron–sulfur cluster biosynthesis. J Mol Biol. 2008;383:133–143. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kim JH, Tonelli M, Frederick RO, Chow DC, Markley JL. Specialized Hsp70 chaperone (HscA) binds preferentially to the disordered form, whereas J-protein (HscB) binds preferentially to the structured form of the iron–sulfur cluster scaffold protein (IscU) J Biol Chem. 2012;287:31406–31413. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.352617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kim JH, Tonelli M, Kim T, Markley JL. three-dimensional structure and determinants of stability of the iron–sulfur cluster scaffold protein IscU from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry. 2012;51:5557–5563. doi: 10.1021/bi300579p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nakanishi T, Tomizawa T, Koshiba S, Inoue M, Kigawa T, Yokoyama S. Solution structure of iron–sulfur cluster protein U (IscU) 2004 doi: f102210/pdb1wfz/pdb. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dai Z. PhD Thesis. University of Wisconsin-Madison; Madison, WI, USA: 2012. NMR studies of conformational states of proteins involved in biosynthesis of iron–sulfur clusters. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Unciuleac MC, Chandramouli K, Naik S, Mayer S, Huynh BH, Johnson MK, Dean DR. In vitro activation of apo-aconitase using a [4Fe–4S] cluster-loaded form of the IscU [Fe–S] cluster scaffolding protein. Biochemistry. 2007;46:6812–6821. doi: 10.1021/bi6026665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shimomura Y, Kamikubo H, Nishi Y, Masako T, Kataoka M, Kobayashi Y, Fukuyama K, Takahashi Y. Characterization and crystallization of an IscU-type scaffold protein with bound [2Fe–2S] cluster from the hyperthermophile Aquifex aeolicus. J Biochem. 2007;142:577–586. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvm163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wu G, Mansy SS, Hemann C, Hille R, Surerus KK, Cowan JA. Iron-sulfur cluster biosynthesis: characterization of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Isa1. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2002;7:526–532. doi: 10.1007/s00775-001-0330-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Foster MW, Mansy SS, Hwang J, Penner-Hahn JE, Surerus KK, Cowan JA. A mutant human IscU protein contains a stable [2Fe–2S](2+) center of possible functional significance. J Am Chem Soc. 2000;122:6805–6806. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wu SP, Wu G, Surerus KK, Cowan JA. Iron–sulfur cluster biosynthesis. Kinetic analysis of [2Fe–2S] cluster transfer from holo ISU to apo Fd: role of redox chemistry and a conserved aspartate. Biochemistry. 2002;41:8876–8885. doi: 10.1021/bi0256781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mansy SS, Cowan JA. Iron–sulfur cluster biosynthesis: toward an understanding of cellular machinery and molecular mechanism. Acc Chem Res. 2004;37:719–725. doi: 10.1021/ar0301781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dorman DE, Torchia DA, Bovey FA. Carbon-13 and proton nuclear magnetic resonance observations of the conformation of poly(L-proline) in aqueous salt solutions. Macromolecules. 1973;6:80–82. doi: 10.1021/ma60031a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Howarth OW, Lilley DMJ. Carbon-13NMR of peptides and proteins. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 1978;12:1–40. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schubert M, Labudde D, Oschkinat H, Schmieder P. A software tool for the prediction of Xaa–Pro peptide bond conformations in proteins based on 13C chemical shift statistics. J Biomol NMR. 2002;24:149–154. doi: 10.1023/a:1020997118364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shen Y, Bax A. Prediction of Xaa–Pro peptide bond conformation from sequence and chemical shifts. J Biomol NMR. 2010;46:199–204. doi: 10.1007/s10858-009-9395-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Siemion IZ, Wieland T, Pook KH. Influence of the distance of the proline carbonyl from the β and γ carbon on the 13C chemical shifts. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 1975;14:702–703. doi: 10.1002/anie.197507021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Montelione GT, Wagner G. 2D chemical-exchange NMR-spectroscopy by proton-detected heteronuclear correlation. J Am Chem Soc. 1989;111:3096–3098. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Schanda P, Brutscher B. Very fast two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy for real-time investigation of dynamic events in proteins on the time scale of seconds. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:8014–8015. doi: 10.1021/ja051306e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cupp-Vickery JR, Peterson JC, Ta DT, Vickery LE. Crystal structure of the molecular chaperone HscA substrate binding domain complexed with the IscU recognition peptide ELPPVKIHC. J Mol Biol. 2004;342:1265–1278. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.07.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Tsai J, Douglas MG. A conserved HPD sequence of the J-domain is necessary for YDJ1 stimulation of Hsp70 ATPase activity at a site distinct from substrate binding. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:9347–9354. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.16.9347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Layer G, Ollagnier-de Choudens S, Sanakis Y, Fontecave M. Iron–sulfur cluster biosynthesis: characterization of Escherichia coli CyaY as an iron donor for the assembly of [2Fe–2S] clusters in the scaffold IscU. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:16256–16263. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M513569200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Adinolfi S, Iannuzzi C, Prischi F, Pastore C, Iametti S, Martin SR, Bonomi F, Pastore A. Bacterial frataxin CyaY is the gatekeeper of iron–sulfur cluster formation catalyzed by IscS. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009;16:390–396. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bridwell-Rabb J, Iannuzzi C, Pastore A, Barondeau DP. Effector role reversal during evolution: the case of frataxin in Fe–S cluster biosynthesis. Biochemistry. 2012;51:2506–2514. doi: 10.1021/bi201628j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tsai CL, Barondeau DP. Human frataxin is an allosteric switch that activates the Fe–S cluster biosynthetic complex. Biochemistry. 2010;49:9132–9139. doi: 10.1021/bi1013062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lazazzera BA, Beinert H, Khoroshilova N, Kennedy MC, Kiley PJ. DNA binding and dimerization of the Fe–S-containing FNR protein from Escherichia coli are regulated by oxygen. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:2762–2768. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.5.2762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cupp-Vickery JR, Urbina H, Vickery LE. Crystal structure of IscS, a cysteine desulfurase from Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 2003;330:1049–1059. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00690-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Cupp-Vickery JR, Silberg JJ, Ta DT, Vickery LE. Crystal structure of IscA, an iron–sulfur cluster assembly protein from Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 2004;338:127–137. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.02.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hoff KG, Cupp-Vickery JR, Vickery LE. Contributions of the LPPVK motif of the iron–sulfur template protein IscU to interactions with the Hsc66–Hsc20 chaperone system. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:37582–37589. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M305292200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Schwartz CJ, Djaman O, Imlay JA, Kiley PJ. The cysteine desulfurase IscS, has a major role in in vivo Fe–S cluster formation in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:9009–9014. doi: 10.1073/pnas.160261497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Silberg JJ, Hoff KG, Tapley TL, Vickery LE. The Fe/S assembly protein IscU behaves as a substrate for the molecular chaperone Hsc66 from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:1696–1700. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M009542200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Silberg JJ, Tapley TL, Hoff KG, Vickery LE. Regulation of the HscA ATPase reaction cycle by the co-chaperone HscB and the iron-sulfur cluster assembly protein IscU. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:53924–53931. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M410117200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




