Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1969 May;44(5):623–630. doi: 10.1104/pp.44.5.623

Changes in Photosensitive Stem Growth in Intact Peas Following Irradiation 1

William M Elliott a,2, John H Miller a
PMCID: PMC396137  PMID: 16657112

Abstract

Etiolated pea seedlings given a short red-light pretreatment followed by 30 hr of darkness no longer showed a typical red-light inhibition of internode elongation. The induction of phytochrome-insensitive growth was itself mediated by phytochrome, since far-red light reversed the effect of the short red-light pretreatment. Peas grown in white light showed a similar insensitivity to red light. However, in this instance the phytochrome system exerted some control over internode elongation since far-red light promoted growth slightly, and this effect was red-reversible.

The loss of sensitivity to red light was correlated with a decrease in the amount of spectrophotometrically assayable phytochrome. However, the loss of phytochrome occurred in a relatively short time compared to the period necessary to attain maximal insensitive growth (2 hr versus about 30 hr). Also, after the red-light and dark pretreatment, although 40% of the original amount of phytochrome remained, red light had no effect on elongation. Neither loss of phytochrome nor loss of red-light sensitive growth was observed at 0 to 1°.

Full text

PDF
623

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Briggs W. R., Chon H. P. The physiological versus the spectrophotometric status of phytochrome in corn coleoptiles. Plant Physiol. 1966 Sep;41(7):1159–1166. doi: 10.1104/pp.41.7.1159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Butler W. L., Lane H. C. Dark Transformations of Phytochrome in vivo. II. Plant Physiol. 1965 Jan;40(1):13–17. doi: 10.1104/pp.40.1.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Butler W. L., Lane H. C., Siegelman H. W. Nonphotochemical Transformations of Phytochrome in Vivo. Plant Physiol. 1963 Sep;38(5):514–519. doi: 10.1104/pp.38.5.514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clarkson D. T., Hillman W. S. Stable concentrations of phytochrome in pisum under continuous illumination with red light. Plant Physiol. 1968 Jan;43(1):88–92. doi: 10.1104/pp.43.1.88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fox L. R., Hillman W. S. Differences in Photoresponse and Phytochrome Spectrophotometry Between Etiolated and De-etiolated Pea Stem Tissue. Plant Physiol. 1968 Nov;43(11):1799–1804. doi: 10.1104/pp.43.11.1799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lockhart J. A. REVERSAL OF THE LIGHT INHIBITION OF PEA STEM GROWTH BY THE GIBBERELLINS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1956 Nov;42(11):841–848. doi: 10.1073/pnas.42.11.841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lockhart J. A. Studies on the Mechanism of Stem Growth Inhibition by Visible Radiation. Plant Physiol. 1959 Jul;34(4):457–460. doi: 10.1104/pp.34.4.457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES