Abstract
TAK-701 is a humanized antibody that binds hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), thus suppressing c-Met transduced signaling and c-Met dependent proliferation and migration of tumor cells. Six childhood solid tumor xenografts were selected for evaluating TAK-701 based on immunochemical detection of HGF/c-Met autocrine signaling [i.e., pMet(Tyr1349) and HGF positive]. TAK-701 was tested using a dose of 30 mg/kg administered by the intraperitoneal (IP) route twice weekly for 4 weeks. TAK-701 did not induce significant differences in EFS distribution in treated tumors compared to control tumors. Objective responses were not observed in any of the tested solid tumor xenografts.
Keywords: Preclinical Testing, Developmental Therapeutics, c-Met inhibition
INTRODUCTION
Increased expression of the c-Met receptor or its ligand (hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor; HGF) occurs frequently in human cancer, and increases with tumor progression in some malignancies [1]. Ligand activation of c-Met results in phosphorylation of GAB1 which, in turn, recruits a number of signaling effectors, including PI3K, SHP2, and PLC-γ [2]. GAB1 phosphorylation by MET results in a sustained signal that mediates most of the downstream signaling pathways including PI3 kinase and Ras. There is evidence that HGF/c-Met may be involved in several childhood cancers. For example, MET has been shown to be highly overexpressed in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS) [3-5], and was detected in all of 68 rhabdomyosarcoma specimens. Of these 62 percent of tumors co-expressed HGF, however, neither high MET or HGF expression correlated with metastatic disease [6]. Simultaneous loss of Ink4a/Arf function and disruption of c-Met signaling in Ink4a/Arf−/− mice transgenic for HGF/SF induces rhabdomyosarcoma with extremely high penetrance and short latency [7]. Neuroblastoma cell lines express HGF, but require exogenous ligand to stimulate c-Met phosphorylation [8], and PHA665752, a small-molecule inhibitor of c-Met, inhibited ligand-induced migration and proliferation of c-Met-positive neuroblastoma cells [9].
Modeling the HGF/MET pathway in mice with xenografts is difficult because murine HGF does not activate human c-Met [10]. One approach to evaluating the role of inhibitors of HGF/MET signaling is use of immunocompromised mice transgenic for human HGF or use of other strategies for expressing human HGF in mice [11,12]. We have taken an alternative approach of identifying a series of pediatric solid tumor xenografts in the Pediatric Preclinical Testing Program (PPTP) panels that exhibit c-Met activation, presumably as a result of autocrine stimulation via secreted HGF. TAK-701 is a humanized monoclonal antibody (MAb) that is derived from the murine MAb L2G7 and that has high affinity for HGF [13-15]. TAK-701 inhibits the binding of HGF to c-Met and inhibits the intra-cellular phosphorylation of c-Met and its downstream factors, Gab1, AKT, and ERK1/2, in a concentration-dependent manner [15]. TAK-701 shows in vivo antitumor activity against various adult cancer preclinical models that have autocrine dependence on HGF [14]. We have evaluated TAK-701 in a limited series of pediatric in vivo models with autocrine stimulation of HGF/MET signaling.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In vivo tumor growth inhibition studies
CB17SC scid−/− female mice (Taconic Farms, Germantown NY), were used to propagate subcutaneously implanted kidney/rhabdoid tumors, sarcomas (osteosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma), and neuroblastoma, while BALB/c nu/nu mice were used for glioma models, as previously described [16,17]. Female mice were used irrespective of the patient gender from which the original tumor was derived. All mice were maintained under barrier conditions and experiments were conducted using protocols and conditions approved by the institutional animal care and use committee of the appropriate consortium member. Ten mice were used in each control or treatment group. Tumor volumes (cm3) for solid tumor xenografts were determined as previously described [16]. Responses were determined using three activity measures as previously described [16]. An in-depth description of the analysis methods is included in the Supplemental Response Definitions section.
Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis for pMET, MET, and HGF
IHC was performed on paraffin-embedded formalin fixed xenograft tissues. The following antibodies were used: anti-pMet Tyr1349 antibody rom Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA); anti-c-Met antibody from Zymed (Carlsbad, CA); anti-HGF antibody from IBL (Minneapolis, MN); mouse IgG isotype control antibody from Dako; and rabbit IgG isotype control antibody from Dako. Stained slides were scanned using an Aperio ScanScope CS system (Vista, CA) to produce whole slide images. Staining was evaluated on a semi-quantitative scale, and the percentage of cancer cells staining at each of the following four levels was recorded: 0 (unstained), 1+ (weak staining), 2+ (moderate staining) and 3+ (strong staining). An H-score was calculated based on the summation of the product of percent of cells stained at each intensity.
Statistical Methods
The exact log-rank test, as implemented using Proc StatXact for SAS®, was used to compare event-free survival distributions between treatment and control groups. P-values were two-sided and were not adjusted for multiple comparisons given the exploratory nature of the studies.
Drugs and Formulation
TAK-701 was provided to the Pediatric Preclinical Testing Program by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, through the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (NCI). TAK-701 was diluted in sterile saline and stored at 4°C, protected from light, and was administered intraperitoneally (IP) using a twice-weekly schedule for 4 weeks at a dose of 30 mg/kg. TAK-701 was provided to each consortium investigator in coded vials for blinded testing.
RESULTS
In vivo testing
Tumors were selected for evaluation against TAK-701 based on immunohistochemical detection of activated c-Met(Tyr1349) and detection of HGF in sections from tumor xenografts (Figure 1 and Supplemental Figure 1). All 6 xenograft models studied were considered evaluable for efficacy. A complete summary of results is provided in Supplemental Table I. TAK-701 administered twice-weekly at 30 mg/kg failed to induced significant differences in EFS distribution compared to control in any of the 6 evaluable solid tumor xenografts, Table I.
Figure 1.

Photomicrographs (20×) of IHC staining in xenografts.
Table I.
Summary of in Vivo Activity of TAK-701
| Xenograft Line | Histology | Median Time to Event | P-value | EFS T/C | Median Final RTV | T/C | T/C Activity | EFS Activity | Response Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rh18 | Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma | 12.7 | 0.856 | 1.3 | >4 | 0.88 | Low | Low | Low |
| BT-39 | Glioblastoma | 14.5 | 0.421 | 1.1 | >4 | 0.79 | Low | Low | Low |
| NB-EBc1 | Neuroblastoma | 4.7 | 0.603 | 1.0 | >4 | 0.99 | Low | Low | Low |
| CHLA-79 | Neuroblastoma | 7.9 | 0.430 | 1.1 | >4 | 0.72 | Low | Low | Low |
| OS-1 | Osteosarcoma | 27.6 | 0.269 | 1.1 | >4 | 0.83 | Low | Low | Low |
| OS-2 | Osteosarcoma | 18.6 | 0.201 | 1.1 | >4 | 0.91 | Low | Low | Low |
DISCUSSION
HGF and the c-Met receptor are overexpressed together in many solid tumors, including some childhood cancers. In humans, HGF can act as both an autocrine and as a paracrine growth factor, inducing signals resulting in increased cancer cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and drug resistance. MET has been shown to be highly overexpressed in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS) [3-5], but while the gene is not mutated or amplified the expression level at the RNA level was found to be significantly higher in patients who died of disease [18]. MET is highly expressed in cell lines derived from ARMS [5], and HGF induces motility and confers drug resistance in rhabdomyosarcoma cells [19].
We selected 6 xenograft models that exhibited robust phosphorylation of c-Met as well as HGF expression by immunohistochemistry. As murine HGF does not activate the human receptor, these data imply autocrine activation, at least under conditions of growth in the mouse. TAK-701 is a humanized monoclonal antibody with high affinity to HGF that blocks various HGF-induced biological activities as well as inhibits tumor growth in an autocrine HGF-MET–driven xenograft model [14,15]. In a previous study [13] it was shown that TAK-701 administered IP biweekly (5 mg/kg) effectively reversed gefitinib resistance in a NSCLC xenograft model engineered to overexpress HGF. In the current experiments TAK-701 was administered IP at 30 mg/kg biweekly for a planned 4 week treatment period but failed to significantly retard growth of any of the PPTP tumor models evaluated. Failure to inhibit growth may have several reasons, although this dose and schedule of TAK-701 effectively stabilized growth of several adult cancer preclinical models including U87MG (glioblastoma), IM95 (gastric), KP4 (pancreatic) and MC-10 (breast cancer) [14]. While several studies have used IV administration of TAK-701, the antibody has been shown effective when administered IP [13], thus it seems unlikely that the route of administration used influenced the negative activity in our study. Our results indicate that while HGF/c-Met signaling may be important for maintaining certain malignant characteristics (e.g., invasion and metastasis), TAK-701, an antibody known to block HGF binding to its receptor, was not able to significantly inhibit growth of the childhood cancer preclinical models studied.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NO1-CM-42216, CA21765, and CA108786 from the National Cancer Institute TAK-701 was provided by Millennium Pharmaceuticals. We thank members of the MPI Molecular Pathology group for immunohistochemical staining. In addition to the authors, the study represents work contributed by the following: Sherry Ansher, Joshua Courtright, Edward Favours, Henry S. Friedman, Melissa Sammons, Charles Stopford, Chandra Tucker, Catherine Billups, Joe Zeidner, Ellen Zhang, and Jian Zhang.
Footnotes
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT: The authors consider that there are no actual or perceived conflicts of interest.
Reference List
- 1.Longati P, Comoglio PM, Bardelli A. Receptor tyrosine kinases as therapeutic targets: the model of the MET oncogene. Current drug targets. 2001;2(1):41–55. doi: 10.2174/1389450013348920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bardelli A, Longati P, Gramaglia D, et al. Gab1 coupling to the HGF/Met receptor multifunctional docking site requires binding of Grb2 and correlates with the transforming potential. Oncogene. 1997;15(25):3103–3111. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ginsberg JP, Davis RJ, Bennicelli JL, et al. Up-regulation of MET but not neural cell adhesion molecule expression by the PAX3-FKHR fusion protein in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancer research. 1998;58(16):3542–3546. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ferracini R, Olivero M, Di Renzo MF, et al. Retrogenic expression of the MET proto-oncogene correlates with the invasive phenotype of human rhabdomyosarcomas. Oncogene. 1996;12(8):1697–1705. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Epstein JA, Shapiro DN, Cheng J, et al. Pax3 modulates expression of the c-Met receptor during limb muscle development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1996;93(9):4213–4218. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.9.4213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rees H, Williamson D, Papanastasiou A, et al. The MET receptor tyrosine kinase contributes to invasive tumour growth in rhabdomyosarcomas. Growth factors (Chur, Switzerland) 2006;24(3):197–208. doi: 10.1080/08977190600759923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sharp R, Recio JA, Jhappan C, et al. Synergism between INK4a/ARF inactivation and aberrant HGF/SF signaling in rhabdomyosarcomagenesis. Nat Med. 2002;8(11):1276–1280. doi: 10.1038/nm787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hecht M, Papoutsi M, Tran HD, et al. Hepatocyte growth factor/c-Met signaling promotes the progression of experimental human neuroblastomas. Cancer research. 2004;64(17):6109–6118. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Crosswell HE, Dasgupta A, Alvarado CS, et al. PHA665752, a small-molecule inhibitor of c-Met, inhibits hepatocyte growth factor-stimulated migration and proliferation of c-Met-positive neuroblastoma cells. BMC cancer. 2009;9:411. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jeffers M, Rong S, Woude GF. Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor-Met signaling in tumorigenicity and invasion/metastasis. J Mol Med (Berl) 1996;74(9):505–513. doi: 10.1007/BF00204976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhang YW, Su Y, Lanning N, et al. Enhanced growth of human met-expressing xenografts in a new strain of immunocompromised mice transgenic for human hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor. Oncogene. 2005;24(1):101–106. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Francone TD, Landmann RG, Chen CT, et al. Novel xenograft model expressing human hepatocyte growth factor shows ligand-dependent growth of c-Met-expressing tumors. Molecular cancer therapeutics. 2007;6(4):1460–1466. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Okamoto W, Okamoto I, Tanaka K, et al. TAK-701, a humanized monoclonal antibody to hepatocyte growth factor, reverses gefitinib resistance induced by tumor-derived HGF in non-small cell lung cancer with an EGFR mutation. Molecular cancer therapeutics. 2010;9(10):2785–2792. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-10-0481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hori A, Kitahara O, Ito Y, et al. Monotherapeutic and combination antitumor activities of TAK-701, a humanized anti-hepatocyte growth factor neutralizing antibody, against multiple types of cancer. Proceedings of the 100th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kitahara O, Nishizawa S, Ito Y, et al. In vitro profiles of TAK-701, a humanized anti-hepatocyte growth factor neutralizing antibody, and the antitumor activity against U-87MG GBM with anti-angiogenic activity. Proceedings of the 100th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Houghton PJ, Morton CL, Tucker C, et al. The pediatric preclinical testing program: Description of models and early testing results. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006 doi: 10.1002/pbc.21078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Keir ST, Morton CL, Billups C, et al. Initial testing of VNP40101M (Cloretazine) by the pediatric preclinical testing program. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008;51(3):439–441. doi: 10.1002/pbc.21620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chen Y, Takita J, Mizuguchi M, et al. Mutation and expression analyses of the MET and CDKN2A genes in rhabdomyosarcoma with emphasis on MET overexpression. Genes, chromosomes & cancer. 2007;46(4):348–358. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jankowski K, Kucia M, Wysoczynski M, et al. Both hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and stromal-derived factor-1 regulate the metastatic behavior of human rhabdomyosarcoma cells, but only HGF enhances their resistance to radiochemotherapy. Cancer research. 2003;63(22):7926–7935. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
