Skip to main content
BMJ Case Reports logoLink to BMJ Case Reports
. 2014 Mar 19;2014:bcr2014203792. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2014-203792

A case of asymptomatic renal pseudoaneurysm post partial nephrectomy treated successfully

Rozh Jalil 1, Omar Mohamed 2, Jeff Webster 2
PMCID: PMC3962965  PMID: 24648479

Abstract

Pseudoaneurysm remains one of the rare complications of partial nephrectomy with reported rates of 0.4–1.4%. We add to the literature a case of asymptomatic pseudoaneurysm post laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) that was successfully treated with embolisation.

Background

Pseudoaneurysm post laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is a rare complication and in majority of cases patients present with symptoms of pain, haematuria and dysuria.1 2 In our reported case, the patient had no symptoms and was found to have a mass on follow-up CT scan that was confirmed later to be a pseudoaneurysm on ultrasonography (US).

Case presentation

We present a 60-year-old man with an incidental finding of a small left renal mass on abdominal US to investigate an abnormality in his liver function tests. He underwent partial nephrectomy through transperitoneal three ports approach. Histopathology confirmed this to be a grade 1 clear cell carcinoma with clear margins. A follow-up CT scan detected a mass in the lower pole of the left kidney which was confirmed by US to be a pseudoaneurysm. At this stage, the patient remains asymptomatic. Other medical history included cirrhosis.

Investigations

A follow-up CT scan was performed 6 months postsurgery and a 5×4 cm mixed cystic and solid mass in the lower pole of the left kidney was detected (figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

CT scan showing a mass in the lower pole of the left kidney post partial nephrectomy.

A Doppler US was arranged and once again a non-echoic lesion is seen within the cortex of the inferior pole of the left kidney with a turbulent Doppler flow within the centre in keeping with blood flow that was consistent with the appearances of a pseudoaneurysm (figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

An ultrasound scan showing turbulent flow in the mass confirming the diagnosis of pseudoaneurysm.

Differential diagnosis

  • Postoperative haematoma and/or collection.

  • Recurrence of tumour. However, after discussion with the urology multidisciplinary team meeting, this was excluded in our case.

Treatment

The patient underwent percutaneous selective coil angioembolisation. The approach was through ultrasound-guided retrograde right common femoral artery puncture (figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Embolisation of the pseudoaneurysm.

Postprocedure, a Doppler US showed a well-defined, 4×4×4 cm, slightly heterogenous, moderately echogenic mass with no Doppler colour flow (figure 4). This was consistent with a successful embolised pseudoaneurysm.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Postemobolisation ultrasonography showing no flow in the pseudoaneurysm.

Outcome and follow-up

The patient was discharged with no immediate complications and to be followed up in the outpatient department with follow-up imaging and blood investigations.

Discussion

As aforementioned, pseudoaneurysm is a rare sequela post partial nephrectomy but a potentially life-threatening one. There have been some reported cases in the literature about presentation and management of pseudoaneurysm post partial nephrectomy.35 It has been reported that first symptom presentation was observed at a median of 12.5 days (range 6–36) after surgery.6 Early identification and proper management can help reduce the potential morbidity associated with pseudoaneurysms.

Learning points .

  • We reemphasise on regular follow-ups of all patients who had partial nephrectomy.

  • Early identification and proper management can help reduce the potential morbidity associated with pseudoaneurysms.

  • Minimal invasive treatment should be considered as the first line of management in these cases.

  • Despite that pseudoaneurysm is associated with symptoms in most of the cases; symptoms should not be the only indicator to carry out follow-up imaging.

Footnotes

Contributors: RJ was involved in data collection, analysis, literature review and drafting the abstract. OM helped with data collection, imaging and design the abstract. JW helped with drafting, the operating surgeon and final review of the abstract.

Competing interests: None.

Patient consent: Obtained.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

  • 1.Albani JM, Novick AC. Renal artery pseudoaneurysm after partial nephrectomy: three case reports and a literature review. Urology 2003;62:227–31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Singh D, Gill IS. Renal artery pseudoaneurysm following laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2005;174:2256–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shapiro EY, Hakimi AA, Hyams ES, et al. Renal artery pseudoaneurysm following laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Urology 2009;74:819–23 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kavouras A, Sfoungaristos S, Perimenis P. Renal artery pseudoaneurysm after partial nephrectomy. Hippokratia 2011;15:284–5 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cohenpour M, Strauss S, Gottlieb P, et al. Pseudoaneurysm of the renal artery following partial nephrectomy: imaging findings and coil embolization. Clin Radiol 2007;62:1104–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Netsch C, Bruning R, Bach T, et al. Management of renal artery pseudoaneurysm after partial nephrectomy. World J Urol 2010;28:519–24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ Case Reports are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES