Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 24.
Published in final edited form as: Fertil Steril. 2012 Jan;97(1):154–159. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.005

Relationship Between Reproductive History, Anthropometrics, Lifestyle Factors, and the Likelihood of Persistent Chemotherapy-Related Amenorrhea in Women with Premenopausal Breast Cancer

Mary E Abusief 1, Stacey A Missmer 1,2,3, Elizabeth S Ginsburg 1, Jane C Weeks 4, Ann H Partridge 4
PMCID: PMC3963606  NIHMSID: NIHMS476658  PMID: 22192139

Abstract

Objective

To determine the association between patient characteristics at diagnosis of premenopausal breast cancer including gravidity, parity, age at menarche, age at first birth, alcohol use, smoking history, weight, height, and body mass index (BMI) with the development of persistent chemotherapy-related amenorrhea (CRA) in follow-up.

Design

Retrospective Cohort

Setting

Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) and Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH)

Patients

Premenopausal women with breast cancer

Methods

We identified all premenopausal women who received standard adjuvant chemotherapy from 1997-2005 for whom menstrual data were available. Multivariable logistic regression models evaluating persistent amenorrhea at ≥ 6 month after completing chemotherapy were conducted.

Results

431 women met eligibility criteria and had ≥ 6 month follow-up. Women with older (age >13 years) versus younger (12-13 years) age at menarche were more than twice as likely to remain amenorreheic (p-value, test for linear trend = 0.03). Current smokers had 2.4 greater odds of CRA versus never smokers, although this association was not statistically significant (95% CI=0.86-6.75).

Discussion

Few identifiable factors contribute to the variability in CRA among premenopausal women following adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Further research to improve the prediction of CRA, premature menopause and infertility in young breast cancer survivors is warranted.

Keywords: Chemotherapy-related amenorrhea, breast cancer, gravidity, parity, lifestyle factors, premature menopause

INTRODUCTION

Disruption of menstrual function and loss of reproductive potential in breast cancer survivors is a frequent side effect of breast cancer treatment(1-9) Of the nearly 180,000 new cases of breast cancer diagnosed annually in the United States, approximately 25% occur in premenopausal women(10, 11). Adjuvant chemotherapy, while clearly beneficial to survival(12), may result in short or long term CRA, early menopause and loss of reproductive potential leading to profound physical and emotional ramifications.(3) In some settings, however, CRA may be a welcome event, given evolving evidence for its association with survival in this population.(13) Thus, improved understanding of the risk of CRA may have important implications for women with breast cancer.

Although previous studies have evaluated the association between reproductive history, anthropometrics, lifestyle factors and timing of natural menopause(14-24), the relation of these factors to CRA has not been evaluated, with the exception of one study that exploring CRA and weight gain during chemotherapy.(25) We sought to evaluate whether reproductive history (gravidity, parity, age at menarche, age at first birth), anthropometrics (weight, height, BMI), or lifestyle factors (alcohol use and smoking history) at the time of diagnosis are associated with CRA in premenopausal women with breast cancer.

MATERIALS and METHODS

Study Population

Newly diagnosed breast cancer patients treated at DFCI are asked to participate in a disease registry that includes baseline and longitudinal information regarding clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes (90% participation). The registry and this analysis, were approved by the IRB of Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center. Eligibility criteria for this analysis included: premenopausal status at time of diagnosis of early stage breast cancer; no prior chemotherapy; treatment with adjuvant adriamycin/cyclophosphamide (AC) chemotherapy without ovarian ablation at DFCI between 1997 and 2005; menstrual function information; and an intact uterus for a minimum of 6 months following treatment cessation. AC chemotherapy included doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2 every 2 (dose-dense, or DD) or 3 weeks (q3wk) for four cycles, with or without paclitaxel (T) (4 cycles of at 175 mg/m2 administered weekly at 80 mg/m2 [AC-T]) or T and trastuzumab (H) (12 weeks of weekly T at 80 mg/m2 and weekly H (at 2mg/kg with an initial loading dose of 4mg/kg), (T + H). Eligible subjects could receive adjuvant tamoxifen (TAM) but not other hormonal agents.

The primary source of menstrual status at diagnosis was patient survey, confirmed through directed chart review. Patients were considered to be premenopausal at diagnosis if they reported menses within the prior six months and were not on hormone replacement therapy. Patients with absent or conflicting information on menstrual status at diagnosis from survey and chart review were classified as postmenopausal if they were 50 years of age or older.

Directed medical record reviews were conducted to determine menstrual status during follow-up. Persistent chemotherapy-related amenorrhea was defined as lack of return of cyclic menstrual bleeding after chemotherapy during the follow-up intervals under consideration (≤6 months, between 6-12 months, >12 months after the completion of chemotherapy). A single, isolated episode of bleeding was not considered as a resumption of menstrual function. Also, a patient who resumed menses at any point during follow-up was not considered as having persistent CRA. Patients who developed cancer recurrence were censored at the time of recurrence. Patients who underwent oophorectomy or hysterectomy in follow-up were censored at that time.

Statistical Methods

The distribution of patient characteristics was quantified among all women and stratified by amenorrheic status throughout follow-up. Unconditional multivariable logistic regression – adjusted for available covariates including age at diagnosis, age at menarche, weight, gravidity, parity, smoking, alcohol consumption, type and regimen of chemotherapy, use of TAM or H and length of follow-up- was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). (74) To evaluate heterogeneous associations with age at diagnosis, we also applied these models to the study population stratified at age 40. Linear trend was evaluated via two-sided Wald test for all ordinal variables with continuous or count structure as is standard epidemiologic practice to assess a “dose-response” association for these variables. Power for intracategory pair-wise comparisons is reduced when evaluating categorical associations while linear trend is evaluated utilizing the entire study population. Therefore, it is often observed that a trend across effect estimates is apparent and the test for linear trend is statistically significant even when individual categorical comparisons include 1.0 within the 95% confidence intervals.

All multivariable Wald statistic p-values are based on two-sided tests. The SAS statistical software (version 9.1, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) was used for all analyses.

RESULTS

Patient Characteristics

We identified 431 premenopausal breast cancer patients who met eligibility criteria. (Table 1) Eight hundred and ninety-one premenopausal women had received AC chemotherapy. However, 460 were excluded for the following reasons: 346 received chemotherapy that deviated from the study criteria, 64 had undergone hysterectomy and/or removal of bilateral ovaries before treatment, 10 underwent hysterectomy after completing chemotherapy but before 6 months of follow-up, 26 had insufficient menstrual status information after follow-up, and 14 received leuprolide or aromatase inhibitors during and/or after chemotherapy.

Table 1.

Study population characteristics by amenorrhea status at end of follow-up after chemotherapy among premenopausal women diagnosed with breast cancer (n = 431).

Variables Na Median Minimum Maximum
Total follow-up time (months) 431 33 6 114
Age at diagnosis (years) 431 43 25 56
Gravidity 429 2 0 12
Parity 425 2 0 12
Age at Menarche (years) 427 13 9 18
Age at first birth (years) 310 29 15 45
Weight (kg) 415 65 42.3 119
Height (inches) 373 163 145 180
BMI (kg/m2) 370 23.9 15.1 46.6

N %

BMI
 Underweightb 47 13
 Overweight/obeseb 145 39
Race
 Caucasian 361 94
Cigarette smoking status
 Never 228 53
 Past 165 38
 Current 38 9
Alcohol consumption (drinks per week)
 <1 130 45
  1-4 109 38
  5-9 34 12
 10-19 14 5
Treatment
 AC 228 53
 AC-T
   4 doses 170 39
  12 doses 33 8
 ACT+H
  12 doses 15 4
  52 doses 24 6
 DD 120 28
 TAM 303 70
a

Totals may not = 431 due to missing data

b

underweight = BMI<20.0 kg/m2; overweight/obese = BMI >24.9 kg/m2

Among the 431 women included in our analysis of persistence of CRA at 6 months or greater from completion of chemotherapy (Table 1), all participants received AC chemotherapy; some also received H and TAM. The median follow-up time was 33 months (range 6-114 months). There was minimal loss to follow-up due to missing menstrual cycle data; data were available for 100% of patients at the 6-month, 97% at the 6-12, and 96% at the >12 month intervals, respectively. Menses resumed for 192 women (45%) after completion of chemotherapy. Among the women who reported menses, 119 of 192 (62%) menstruated within 6 months of treatment cessation, 60 (31%) resumed menses between 6-12 months, and 13 (7%) resumed menses more than 12 months after chemotherapy cessation.

Associations with CRA

Table 2 presents the unadjusted and adjusted models of the relation between patient characteristics and likelihood of persistent CRA. The proportion of obese women among those who remained amenorrheic was slightly higher than the proportion among those whose menses returned following treatment cessation (p=0.02). Women who consumed more alcohol also appeared to have an increased odds of CRA (p=0.08, test for linear trend). However, both of these relations were attenuated after adjustment for potential confounders.

Table 2.

Likelihood of persistent CRA by personal characteristics among premenopausal women diagnosed with breast cancer (N=431).

Variable Unadjusted Multivariablea

OR 95% CI p-value OR 95% CI p-value
Reproductive History
Nulliparity
No 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent
Yes 0.72 0.46-1.13 0.15 1.34 0.69-2.62 0.39
Nulligravidity
No Referent 1.00 Referent
Yes 0.78 0.47-1.27 0.32 1.15 0.55-2.43 0.71
Age at Menarche
<12 1.02 0.60-1.76 0.95 0.80 0.36-1.78 0.58
12-13 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent
>13 1.31 0.81-2.13 0.27 2.22 1.06-4.64 0.03
p-value, test for trend = 0.76 p-value, test for trend = 0.03
Age at first birth
<25 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent
25-29 1.36 0.73-2.55 0.34 1.60 0.60-4.21 0.35
30-34 0.57 0.33-0.99 0.04 0.67 0.30-1.50 0.32
≥35 1.29 0.56-2.99 0.55 1.13 0.33-3.84 0.84
p-value, test for trend = 0.80 p-value, test for trend = 0.60
Lifestyle Factors
Alcohol (drinks per week)
<1 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent
1-4 1.15 0.72-1.84 0.55 0.99 0.49-1.97 0.97
5-9 1.30 0.62-2.71 0.49 0.83 0.28-2.46 0.73
10-19 3.33 0.90-12.3 0.07 2.04 0.31-13.3 0.46
p-value, test for trend = 0.08 p-value, test for trend = 0.74
Cigarette Smoking
Never 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent
Past 1.04 0.70-1.56 0.84 1.33 0.72-2.45 0.37
Current 1.42 0.70-2.89 0.33 2.41 0.86-6.75 0.09
Anthropometry
Weight (kg) 1.01 1.00-1.02 0.22 1.01 0.98-1.03 0.66
Height (inches) 1.00 0.97-1.03 0.92 1.02 0.98-1.07 0.32
BMI (kg/m2) 1.03 0.99-1.07 0.22 1.00 0.94-1.06 0.99
Underweightb 0.91 0.48-1.73 0.77 1.19 0.45-3.11 0.73
Healthy 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent
Overweight/obeseb 1.69 1.09-2.64 0.02 1.52 0.79-2.93 0.21

OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval,

a

Multivariable model adjusted for patient age at diagnosis, type and regimen of chemotherapy including AC, T, H, DD and Tam, follow-up time, weight, gravidity, parity, age at menarche, smoking status, and alcohol consumption.

b

underweight = BMI<20.0 kg/m2; overweight/obese = BMI >24.9 kg/m2

After adjusting for age, weight, gravidity, parity, age at menarche, smoking, alcohol use, TAM use, type and regimen of chemotherapy, the multivariable model revealed that the likelihood of remaining amenorrheic during follow-up was not significantly associated with nulligravity, nulliparity, or age at first birth. No suggestion of a linear trend was evident. Women whose age at menarche had been after13 years of age were twice as likely to experience CRA compared to those whose first menstrual period was at age 12 or 13 (odds ratio (OR)=2.22, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.06-4.64; p-value, test for linear trend = 0.03). When analyses of the association with age at menarche were restricted to women aged 40 or older at diagnosis, the observed relation was similar with a slightly stronger linear relation (p-value, test for linear trend = 0.01) (data not shown).

The likelihood of remaining amenorrheic was not related to the woman’s anthropometry – height, weight, or BMI (whether evaluated as a linear relation or categorized as underweight or overweight/obese relative to a healthy BMI). However, while no clear trend across alcohol consumption per week was observed, the data did suggest that current cigarette smokers may be at increased odds of CRA compared to women who never smoked (OR=2.41, 95% CI=0.86-6.75). When analyses of the association with cigarette smoking were restricted to women aged 40 or older at diagnosis, the observed relation increased in magnitude with current smokers observed to be six times more likely to remain amenorrheic compared to never smokers (OR=5.54, 95% CI=1.43-21.5) (data not shown).

A subset analysis of women with at least 12 months of follow-up (N=399), was performed. Only 32 participants were excluded to meet this new restriction. Findings were similar, with cigarette smoking and late age of menses significantly associated with risk of CRA in multivariable analysis. Women age > 13 at menarche were at increased odds of CRA compared with women who underwent menarche at 12-13 (OR=2.55, 95% 1.14-5.70). Current smokers were nearly 4 times more likely to remain amenorrheic compared to never smokers (OR=3.69, 95% 1.18-11.6)(Table 3). Other variables remained non-significant.

Table 3.

Likelihood of persistent CRA by personal characteristics among premenopausal women diagnosed with breast cancer with greater than 12 months follow-up (N=399).

Variable Unadjusted Multivariable1

OR 95% CI p-value OR 95% CI p-value
Reproductive History
Nulliparity
No 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent
Yes 0.68 0.42-1.08 0.10 1.42 0.69-2.94 0.34
Nulligravidity
No Referent 1.00 Referent
Yes 0.78 0.46-1.31 0.35 1.19 0.53-2.69 0.68
Age at Menarche
<12 1.09 0.62-1.90 0.78 0.91 0.39-2.14 0.83
12-13 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent
>13 1.25 0.76-2.06 0.38 2.55 1.14-5.70 0.02
p-value, test for trend = 0.90 p-value, test for trend = 0.02
Age at first birth
<25 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent
25-29 1.28 0.68-2.43 0.45 1.47 0.52-4.14 0.47
30-34 0.59 0.33-1.05 0.07 0.67 0.27-1.68 0.40
≥35 1.37 0.58-3.23 0.47 1.01 0.27-3.68 0.99
p-value, test for trend = 0.72 p-value, test for trend = 0.66
Lifestyle Factors
Alcohol (drinks per week)
<1 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent
1-4 1.15 0.71-1.87 0.57 0.74 0.34-1.60 0.44
5-9 1.33 0.62-2.86 0.47 0.55 0.17-1.79 0.32
10-19 2.88 0.76-11.0 0.12 2.19 0.30-16.0 0.44
p-value, test for trend = 0.12 p-value, test for trend = 0.74
Cigarette Smoking
Never 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent
Past 1.16 0.76-1.76 0.50 1.70 0.86-3.34 0.13
Current 1.63 0.79-3.41 0.19 3.69 1.18-11.6 0.03
Anthropometry
Weight (kg) 1.01 1.00-1.03 0.14 1.01 0.99-1.03 0.33
Height (inches) 1.00 0.97-1.03 0.90 1.03 0.98-1.09 0.24
BMI (kg/m2) 1.03 1.00-1.08 0.13 1.02 0.95-1.08 0.64
Underweight2 0.87 0.45-1.70 0.68 1.21 0.43-3.44 0.72
Healthy 1.00 Referent 1.00 Referent
Overweight/obese2 1.88 1.18-3.00 0.01 1.88 0.91-3.90 0.09

DISCUSSION

The average age of natural menopause in the Western World is 50-51.(20, 21, 23, 26) However, premenopausal breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy are at risk for persistent CRA and early menopause. Although further research is needed to understand the endocrinological relationship between persistent CRA and menopause, symptoms are similar and include side effects of estrogen deficiency and loss of reproductive function. While not all patients receiving chemotherapy experience CRA, the psychological ramifications of early menopause can be devastating, especially for younger breast cancer survivors.(3, 4) Ovarian dysfunction is a well recognized side effect of cytoxic chemotherapeutic agents for breast cancer.(1, 2, 9, 25, 27) While exact mechanisms remain unknown, ovarian function is thought to be compromised by an agent and dose dependent decrease in the number of primordial follicles (9, 25, 28-32) leading to the disruption of normal menstrual cycles and CRA.

Given the important implications of CRA and premature menopause in premenopausal women with breast cancer, improved prediction of this late effect is needed. Unfortunately, we found few additional predictors of persistent CRA. However, the novel finding that women who had later age at menarche and smokers had an increased odds of CRA clearly warrant replication and evaluation of potential mechanisms.

In contrast to our findings, prior population studies demonstrated an increased risk for earlier natural menopause among nulliparous versus parous women or a trend towards a delay in menopause with increasing number of live births.(16, 17, 21, 23, 33-37) Women with continuous ovulatory cycles, uninterrupted by pregnancy, have been hypothesized to experience earlier depletion of their follicular pool leading to earlier menopause.(15) While an interruption in ovulatory cycles may cause a delay in natural menopause, this subtle change in the number of primoridial follicles may not be apparent in women whose reproductive lifespan is truncated by chemotherapeutic agents powerful enough to deplete their entire follicular pool.

The reason for the association between later menarche and CRA is unclear and warrants further investigation. While it is possible that some women with a later onset of menarche may have a smaller original pool of ovarian follicles, increasing their risk of CRA, this has not been supported in the literature. In studies of predictive factors in natural menopause, age at menarche was found to be associated in one study,(38) but not in others(16, 17, 19, 20, 34, 36, 37, 39). It may also be possible that confounding factors, not accounted for in the present study, were present such as menstrual cycle length and oral contraceptive use.

Assessment of lifestyle factors revealed no clear relation between alcohol consumption per week and CRA. However, cigarette smokers were observed to have greater odds of CRA compared to women who never smoked. These findings are consistent with studies of natural menopause in which cigarette smoking is one of the strongest predictors of early menopause.(16, 19, 22, 40-51) Benzopyrene and other polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons contained in cigarette smoke have been linked to destruction of primordial follicles in animal models.(52)

The odds of CRA was not found to be related to a woman’s anthropometry – height, weight, or BMI (whether evaluated as a linear relation or categorized as underweight or overweight/obese relative to a healthy BMI). While some prior studies have similarly observed no association between timing of natural menopause and BMI(21, 22), others observed a delayed(48-50, 53), and another observed earlier onset(37)in obese women. One study demonstrated an association between decreased weight as a predictor of earlier menopause(16). In the only prior study assessing the risk of BMI with timing of CRA, baseline weight was not predictive of CRA, however, weight gain during the year after diagnosis was found to be correlated with CRA(25). In many prior studies, confounders such as smoking history were not taken into account and therefore, further study of the relation between BMI and timing of both natural menopause and CRA is warranted.

Limitations of the current study include its retrospective design. Information about oral contraceptive use and post-treatment anthropometrics were not available. Details of alcohol use were also limited. In an ongoing study, prospectively collected data will limit both potential recall bias and errors in data entry.

Our findings may assist in the counseling of premenopausal women with breast cancer. Validation of our findings in additional cohorts of young survivors and future studies using endocrine biomarkers such as follicle stimulation hormone, estradiol, inhibin, and anti-mullerian hormone levels as well and antral follicle counts are warranted to further understand the relation between CRA and ovarian reserve. Such research may improve our ability to more accurately predicting a patient’s ovarian function and reproductive capacity post-treatment.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Del Mastro L, Venturini M, Sertoli MR, Rosso R. Amenorrhea induced by adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer patients: prognostic role and clinical implications. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1997;43:183–90. doi: 10.1023/a:1005792830054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Collichio F, Pandya K. Amenorrhea following chemotherapy for breast cancer: effect on disease-free survival. Oncology (Williston Park) 1994;8:45–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ganz PA, Rowland JH, Desmond K, Meyerowitz BE, Wyatt GE. Life after breast cancer: understanding women’s health-related quality of life and sexual functioning. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:501–14. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.2.501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Partridge AH, Gelber S, Peppercorn J, Sampson E, Knudsen K, Laufer M, et al. Web-based survey of fertility issues in young women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4174–83. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.01.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Parulekar WR, Day AG, Ottaway JA, Shepherd LE, Trudeau ME, Bramwell V, et al. Incidence and prognostic impact of amenorrhea during adjuvant therapy in high-risk premenopausal breast cancer: analysis of a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study--NCIC CTG MA.5. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6002–8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.The FIGO Manual of Human Reproduction. New Jersey: The Parthenon Publishing Group; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Moore HC. Fertility and the impact of systemic therapy on hormonal status following treatment for breast cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2000;2:587–93. doi: 10.1007/s11912-000-0114-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Padmanabhan N, Wang DY, Moore JW, Rubens RD. Ovarian function and adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1987;23:745–8. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(87)90272-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bines J, Oleske DM, Cobleigh MA. Ovarian function in premenopausal women treated with adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:1718–29. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.5.1718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:43–66. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.57.1.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ries L, Eisner M, Kosary C, editors. SEER Cancer Statistics Review. 1975-2001;2007 [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jemal A, Clegg LX, Ward E, Ries LA, Wu X, Jamison PM, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2001, with a special feature regarding survival. Cancer. 2004;101:3–27. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Swain SM, Jeong JH, Wolmark N. Amenorrhea from breast cancer therapy--not a matter of dose. N Engl J Med. 363:2268–70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1009616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gold EB, Bromberger J, Crawford S, Samuels S, Greendale GA, Harlow SD, et al. Factors associated with age at natural menopause in a multiethnic sample of midlife women. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;153:865–74. doi: 10.1093/aje/153.9.865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cramer DW, Xu H, Harlow BL. Does “incessant” ovulation increase risk for early menopause? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172:568–73. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90574-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Willett W, Stampfer MJ, Bain C, Lipnick R, Speizer FE, Rosner B, et al. Cigarette smoking, relative weight, and menopause. Am J Epidemiol. 1983;117:651–8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Whelan EA, Sandler DP, McConnaughey DR, Weinberg CR. Menstrual and reproductive characteristics and age at natural menopause. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;131:625–32. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Harlow BL, Signorello LB. Factors associated with early menopause. Maturitas. 2000;35:3–9. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5122(00)00092-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kato I, Toniolo P, Akhmedkhanov A, Koenig KL, Shore R, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A. Prospective study of factors influencing the onset of natural menopause. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1271–6. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00119-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.van Noord PA, Dubas JS, Dorland M, Boersma H, te Velde E. Age at natural menopause in a population-based screening cohort: the role of menarche, fecundity, and lifestyle factors. Fertil Steril. 1997;68:95–102. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81482-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bromberger JT, Matthews KA, Kuller LH, Wing RR, Meilahn EN, Plantinga P. Prospective study of the determinants of age at menopause. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;145:124–33. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Brambilla DJ, McKinlay SM. A prospective study of factors affecting age at menopause. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42:1031–9. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90044-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cramer DW, Harlow BL, Xu H, Fraer C, Barbieri R. Cross-sectional and case-controlled analyses of the association between smoking and early menopause. Maturitas. 1995;22:79–87. doi: 10.1016/0378-5122(95)00928-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Frisch RE. Body fat, menarche, fitness and fertility. Hum Reprod. 1987;2:521–33. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Goodwin PJ, Ennis M, Pritchard KI, Trudeau M, Hood N. Risk of menopause during the first year after breast cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2365–70. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.8.2365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.McKinlay S, Jefferys M, Thompson B. An investigation of the age at menopause. J Biosoc Sci. 1972;4:161–73. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000008464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Walshe J. Amenorrhea in Premenopausal Women After Adjuvant Chemotherpy for Breast Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2006;24:5769–79. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.2793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Meirow D, Lewis H, Nugent D, Epstein M. Subclinical depletion of primordial follicular reserve in mice treated with cyclophosphamide: clinical importance and proposed accurate investigative tool. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1903–7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.7.1903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Warne GL, Fairley KF, Hobbs JB, Martin FI. Cyclophosphamide-induced ovarian failure. N Engl J Med. 1973;289:1159–62. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197311292892202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chapman RM, Sutcliffe SB, Malpas JS. Cytotoxic-induced ovarian failure in women with Hodgkin’s disease. I. Hormone function. Jama. 1979;242:1877–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sonmezer M, Oktay K. Fertility preservation in female patients. Hum Reprod Update. 2004;10:251–66. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmh021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nicosia SV, Matus-Ridley M, Meadows AT. Gonadal effects of cancer therapy in girls. Cancer. 1985;55:2364–72. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19850515)55:10<2364::aid-cncr2820551011>3.0.co;2-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jeune B. Parity and age at menopause in a Danish sample. Maturitas. 1986;8:359–65. doi: 10.1016/0378-5122(86)90044-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Stanford JL, Hartge P, Brinton LA, Hoover RN, Brookmyer R. Factors influencing age at natural menopause. J Chron Dis. 1987;40:995–1002. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90113-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Soberon J, Calderon JJ, Goldzieher JW. Relation of parity to age at menopause. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1966;96:96–100. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)34647-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Harlow BL, Signorello LB. Factors associated with early menopause. Maturitas. 2000;35:3–9. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5122(00)00092-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Beser E, Aydemir V, Bozkaya H. Body mass index and age at natural menopause. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1994;37:40–2. doi: 10.1159/000292518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cramer DW, Xu H. Predicting age at menopause. Maturitas. 1996;23:319–26. doi: 10.1016/0378-5122(96)00992-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Parazzini F, Negri E, La Vecchia C. Reproductive and general lifestyle determinants of age at menopause. Maturitas. 1992;15:141–9. doi: 10.1016/0378-5122(92)90248-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kaufman DW, Slone D, Rosenberg L, Miettinen OS, Shapiro S. Cigarette smoking and age at natural menopause. Am J Public Health. 1980;70:420–2. doi: 10.2105/ajph.70.4.420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.McKinlay SM, Bifano NL, McKinlay JB. Smoking and age at menopause in women. Ann Intern Med. 1985;103:350–6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-103-3-350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Everson RB, Sandler DP, Wilcox AJ, Schreinemachers D, Shore DL, Weinberg C. Effect of passive exposure to smoking on age at natural menopause. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986;293:792. doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6550.792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bailey A, Robinson D, Vessey M. Smoking and age of natural menopause. Lancet. 1977;2:722. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(77)90538-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Andersen FS, Transbol I, Christiansen C. Is cigarette smoking a promotor of the menopause? Acta Med Scand. 1982;212:137–9. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1982.tb03185.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jick H, Porter J. Relation between smoking and age of natural menopause. Report from the Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program, Boston University Medical Center. Lancet. 1977;1:1354–5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(77)92562-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kato I, Tominaga S, Suzuki T. Factors related to late menopause and early menarche as risk factors for breast cancer. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1988;79:165–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1988.tb01573.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Baron JA. Smoking and estrogen-related disease. Am J Epidemiol. 1984;119:9–22. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Daniell HW. Smoking, obesity, and the menopause. Lancet. 1978;2:373. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)92970-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Adena MA, Gallagher HG. Cigarette smoking and the age at menopause. Ann Hum Biol. 1982;9:121–30. doi: 10.1080/03014468200005591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lindquist O, Bengtsson C. The effect of smoking on menopausal age. Maturitas. 1979;1:171–3. doi: 10.1016/0378-5122(79)90005-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lindquist O, Bengtsson C. Menopausal age in relation to smoking. Acta Med Scand. 1979;205:73–7. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1979.tb06006.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mattison DR, Thorgeirsson SS. Smoking and industrial pollution, and their effects on menopause and ovarian cancer. Lancet. 1978;1:187–8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)90617-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sherman B, Wallace R, Bean J, Schlabaugh L. Relationship of body weight to menarcheal and menopausal age: implications for breast cancer risk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1981;52:488–93. doi: 10.1210/jcem-52-3-488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES