Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1970 Jan;45(1):95–103. doi: 10.1104/pp.45.1.95

Effect of Carbon Dioxide, Osmotic Potential of Nutrient Solution, and Light Intensity on Transpiration and Resistance to Flow of Water in Pepper Plants 1

B E Janes a
PMCID: PMC396362  PMID: 16657285

Abstract

The rate of transpiration, temperature of the leaves, and relative water content of leaves of pepper plants were measured in a small chamber in which the temperature, relative humidity, and carbon dioxide concentration of recirculated air were controlled and measured. The data reported were obtained by noting the response of pepper plants to all combinations of the following treatments: high light, 1.5 × 106 ergs per square centimeter per second; low light, 3.0 × 104 ergs per square centimeter per second; three levels of CO2: 50, 268, and 730 parts per million; nutrient solution osmotic potentials of −0.5, −5.0, −7.5, and −9.5 bars.

The rate of transpiration of pepper plants was reduced by a decrease in osmotic potential of the nutrient solution, an increase in CO2 concentration in the ambient air, and a decrease in light intensity. The response, as measured by transpiration, to the three variables, light, CO2, and osmotic potential indicated that each variable influenced a different and independent mechanism. A change in a single variable produced essentially the same percentage change at all levels of the other variables. The rate of movement of water from roots to leaves was in response to water potential gradient and not the actual potential in the leaves.

The resistance to flow of water through the plants (R) was estimated by dividing the difference between the water potentials of the solution and the leaves by the rate of transpiration. The data indicated an increase in R as the rate of transpiration decreased. The type and size of errors encountered in the estimation of R and location of R within the plant are discussed.

Full text

PDF
95

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brouwer R. Water movement across the root. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1965;19:131–149. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clarke D. D. Production of pectic enzymes by Phytophthora infestans. Nature. 1966 Aug 6;211(5049):649–649. doi: 10.1038/211649a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gardner W. R., Ehlig C. F. Physical Aspects of the Internal Water Relations of Plant Leaves. Plant Physiol. 1965 Jul;40(4):705–710. doi: 10.1104/pp.40.4.705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. MEES G. C., WEATHERLEY P. E. The mechanism of water absorption by roots. II. The role of hydrostatic pressure gradients across the cortex. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1957 Dec 3;147(928):381–391. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1957.0057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Weatherley P. E. The state and movement of water in the leaf. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1965;19:157–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES