Skip to main content
Health Promotion Perspectives logoLink to Health Promotion Perspectives
. 2013 Jun 30;3(1):124–128. doi: 10.5681/hpp.2013.014

Religiosity and Subjective Well-Being amongst Institutionalized Elderly in Pakistan

Fouzia Gull 1,*, Saima Dawood 1
PMCID: PMC3963692  PMID: 24688960

Abstract

Background: In Pakistan, the issue of institutionalized elderly is a neglected area and little is known about their subjective conditions. The present study was conducted in 2012 which examined the relationship between religiosity and subjective well being amongst institutionalized elderly people.

Methods: Data was collected from 100 adults above the age of 60 years in Lahore,Pakistan, through purposive sampling strategy. Religiosity was measured through Religiosity Index, while Trait Well Being Inventory was used to assess subjective well being.

Results: Pearson product moment correlation coefficient and regression analysis were used for the analysis of the data, which revealed that religiosity has a significant positive relationship with life satisfaction. However, no association was found between religiosity and mood level. Moreover, regression analysis indicated that religiosity positively predicted life satisfaction among elderly.

Conclusion: The current research would create awareness and urge the policy makers to look into this social issue and provide better long term care to the residents of old homes.

Keywords: Subjective well being, Life Satisfaction, Happiness, Religiosity, Elderly

Introduction

The aging process is biological reality and definitely beyond human control. The beginning of old age is 60 or 65 years which is roughly equal to retirement ages in many developed and developing countries1. However, “there is no single age at which we can say that people cross the threshold into old age. Old age does not have a biological definition, only a social one (P.40)2.” Keeping the aforesaid quotation in view, we may tend to consider a relationship between old age and purpose in life. Pakistan is a socially cohesive society and elders are valued and respected. It is normally considered to be the responsibility of the eldest son to take care of their parents. In spite of a socially cohesive society in Pakistan, in some segments, norms have been changing and recently, one can notice a clear turn down of the extended family system3. Children leave their parents and there is no one who could look after their needs. Consequently, the abandoned parents land up in old homes. Additionally, another observable change is the tendency of increasing number of old homes across the country. Old homes do deliver services and amenities which help the elderly people to live in a better condition. However, they do not provide a solution to all their related problems because they require a thorough care constantly. Elderly people come across a variety of problems which are psychological, social and physical in nature4. Moreover, they face issues relating to well being. Many researchers have focused on religiosity as a factor in the well being of elderly. Mochon, Norton and Ariely explained that religion has a positive association with higher levels of subjective well-being5. Similarly, evidence suggested that religious people are almost twice happy than those who are least involved with the religion6. Religious beliefs, practices and spirituality were positively related to subjective well being7. Likewise, positive relationship was found between religiosity and life satisfaction8. In recent years, the trend to give attention to the problems of older persons is on the increase in developed countries. Sadly speaking, in Pakistan, it is still a neglected segment and it is very obvious that little attention is being paid to the older persons especially those living in institutions or old homes. The disciplines such as mental health profession, social work, psychiatry and clinical psychology need to focus on the issues of elderly. In the institutionalized aged, the assessment of religiosity and subjective well-being may offer vital information on the way they cope up with the challenges of life related to aging.

The present study was conducted to see the relationship of religiosity and subjective well being (life satisfaction and mood level) amongst institutionalized elderly in Lahore, Pakistan.

Materials and Methods

Participant and Procedure

An ex post facto research design was used in the present study. This study was performed on sample of 100 individuals, collected from six different old homes located in the city of Lahore, Pakistan in 2012. Moreover, samples were collected through purposive sampling strategy. Participants of age 60 years and above, living in old homes were included in this study. Moreover, participants with intact cognitive functioning were included. The researcher asked questions about time, place and person orientation, to check the cognitive functioning of the residents. The mean age of the sample was 69.29 (SD=10). The sample comprised of 64 men and 36 women.

The pilot study was conducted to see the understanding and conceptual clarity and to assess the feasibility of the research regarding the sample. All old homes of Lahore City Pakistan were approached and permission was taken from the concerned authorities. Pilot study was conducted on 15 participants. After conducting the pilot study, data for the main study was collected. The nature and purpose of research was explained to the participants. Forms were orally administered to the illiterate participants. Confidentiality was ensured concerning their identity and information obtained. Their participation was voluntary. Their consent was obtained prior to the administration.

Measures

Demographic form

Demographic form was devised by the researcher. Through demographic form, the details related to age, gender, education, residential area, information about spouse, information about children and reason for coming to old home were taken.

Religiosity

Indigenously developed scale Religiosity Index (Farooq, 1997)9 was used in the present study to assess the religious beliefs and practices. The scale consists of 27 items which are to be rated on 3 point Likert scale ranged from “Not at All” to “Always”. After the reverse scoring of few items, scores on all items were added to have a composite score of religiosity. The scale is adequate enough in terms of internal consistency and validity. The reported Cronbach alpha reliability is 0.649. However, Cronbach’s Alpha for present study was 0.70.

Trait Well-being Inventory

This scale was originally developed by Delbart in 1998, translated and adapted by Fatima (2004)10. The Urdu version of Trait Well Being Inventory was used in present study to assess subjective well being. It has two scales: Life Satisfaction Scale (7 items) and Mood Level Scale (6 items). The reported alpha reliability of Life Satisfaction Scale and for Mood Level Scale is .89 & .79, respectively. The items are measured on four point Likert Scales where ‘1’ mean ‘Strongly Disagree’ and ‘4’ means, ‘Strongly Agree’. The scale score range from 1 to 4 and high scores indicating the high endorsement of the construct.

Statistical analysis

Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient was employed to assess the relatio-nship between the variables of interest. Further, life satisfaction and mood level were treated as a dependent variable in this research so regre-ssion analysis was used to determine the amou-nt to which religiosity predicts life satisfaction and mood level.

Results

Descriptive statistics of the data revealed that as far education was concerned, considerable number of the participants fall in the illiterate and primary group. Moreover, it explained that men were mostly having small business whereas, majority of the women participants were house wives. 91% of the participants were from urban area and 76% belonged to nuclear family system (Table 1).

Table 1. Frequency of Participant’s demographic characteristics (N=100) .

Characteristics Men
n(%)
Women
n(%)
Education
Illiterate 12(18.8) 15(41.7)
Primary 15(23.4) 7(19.4)
Middle 5(7.8) 1(2.8)
Matric 14(21.9) 4(11.1)
Intermediate 7(10.9) 1(2.8)
Graduation 8(12.5) 5(13.9)
Masters & above 3(4.7) 3(8.4)
Occupation
Professional 8(12.5) 3(8.3)
Skilled jobs 9(14.1) 1(2.8)
Farming 5(7.8) -
Small business 16(25) -
Unemployed 8(12.5) -
Governmental job 4(6.3) 1(2.8)
Private job 4(6.3) 1(2.8)
House wife - 26(72.2)
Labourer 293.1) 1(2.8)
Other 8(12.5) 3(8.3)
Residential Area
Urban 59(92.2) 32(88.9)
Rural 5(7.8) 4(11.1)
Family System
Joint Family System 9(14.1) 15(41.7)
Nuclear Family System 55(85.9) 21(58.3
Marital Status
Married 17(26.6) 4(11.1)
Unmarried 17(26.6) 7(19.4)
Divorced 2(3.1) 3(8.3)
Widow 28(43.8) 22(61.1)

As it is shown in Table 2 it was found significant and positive correlation between religiosity and life satisfaction ( P=.005) which revealed that participants who had higher scores on religiosity had better life satisfaction. However, religiosity was not related to mood level (a dimension of subjective well being).

Table 2. Summary of Intercorrelations, Means and Standard Deviation for Scores on the Religiosity and Trait Well Being (N=100) .

Measure 1 2 3
1.RI -
2.TWB_LS .277** -
3.TWB_ML .140 .706** -

Note: RI= Religiosity Index; TWB_LS= Trait Well Being Life Satisfaction; TWB= Trait

Well Being Mood Level; M= Mean; SD= Standard Deviation; ** P<.01

Table 3 shows the standardized and unstandardized coefficients for the variables entered into the model. The standardized Beta gives a measure of the contribution of each variable to the model.

Table 3. Predictors for Life Satisfaction: A Dimension of Subjective well bein .

Variables B SEB β P
Religiosity .02 .00 .27 .005

Note: B= Unstandardized Coefficient; SEB= Standard Error of Unstandardized Co-efficient;

β= Standardized Coefficient; * C<.05; ** P<.01.

The value of R Square (.077) indicated the proportion of variance in the criterion variable which was accounted for by the model and the adjusted R square was .067.

Here the model explained 6% variance. Moreover, it revealed that by using the enter method, a significant model was emerged: F (99, 8.13). Results revealed that religiosity was positive and significant predictors for life satisfaction ( P=.005). So it could be said that the higher religiosity would result in a better life satisfaction.

For mood level, the second dimension of subjective well being, all the variables were entered into regression model using the enter method. Table 4 indicates that a non-significant model was emerged: F (99, 1.97).

Table 4. Predictors for Mood Level: A Dimension of Subjective well being .

Variables B SEB β P
Religiosity .01 .01 .14 .16

Note: B= Unstandardized Coefficient; SEB= Standard Error of Unstandardized Co-efficient; β= Standardized Coefficient.

Religiosity explained 2% in mood level which revealed that religiosity did not predict mood level. In nutshell, result of the present study revealed that religiosity was positively related to and a predictor for life satisfaction.

Discussion

The current research revealed that religiosity was a significant positive predictor for life satisfaction. The present results are consistent with the findings of earlier researches. Fry found that religiosity was significant predictor for wellbeing in elderly. However, for institutionalized elders this relation was much stronger11. Similar results revealed that religiosity was significant predictors for subjective well being12. Moreover, the same results have been revealed in another study that religiosity was positively related to life satisfaction13.

In the present research, no significant relationship was found between religiosity and mood level (the second subscale of subjective well being). Similar results were reported in another study which revealed a non-significant relationship between religiosity and happiness14. Moreover, the dissimilarity of the results may be attributed to the cultural differences as most of the researches were being carried out in European countries. The present study entails the participants from an Asian country with a specific background (institutionalized elders).

On the basis of the above discussion, it could be concluded that religiosity was significantly related to subjective well being among elderly.

This research has highlighted important relationships between religiosity and subjective well being in a sample of institutionalized elders. This type of research would help the concerned authorities to plan and develop an intervention strategy that would in turn enhance the subjective well being of the old home residents. Further research is needed in this area to counter the limitations faced in this study. The present study showed the relationship between the religiosity and life satisfaction but the model was not extended to examine the causal path way. Moreover, longitudinal research is needed in order to determine the long-term patterns and differences in these patterns over the years with the environmental change.

Conclusion

The present research explained that religiosity positively predict life satisfaction. From these results we can further conclude that more a person is religious, the higher his life satisfaction would be. Further studies should be under taken to evaluate the effects of religiosity on life satisfaction with the passage of time.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the administration and residents of the old homes for their cooperation.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

Citation: Gull F, Dawood S. Religiosity and Subjective Well-Being amongst Institutionalised Elderly in Pakistan.Health Promot Perspect 2013; 3(1): 124-128

References

  • 1. Gorman M. Development and the rights of older people. In: Randel J, German T, Ewing D (Eds.), The ageing and development report: poverty, independence and the world’s older people. London Earthscan Publications Ltd, UK, pp. 3:21; 1999.
  • 2. Albert SM. Public health and aging: An in-troduction to maximizing function and well-being. New York: Springer Publishing Com-pany; 2004.
  • 3.Itrat A, Taqui AM, Qazi F, Qidwai W. Family systems: perceptions of elderly patients and their attendents presenting at a university hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc. 2007;57:106–109. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Salman N. The situation of elderly population In Pakistan: Problems and Prospects. Pakistan J Special Edu. 2008;9:57–71. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mochon D, Norton MI, Ariely D. Who Benefits from Religion? Social Indices Res. 2011;101:1–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Myers DG. The funds, friends, and faith of happy people. Am Psychol. 2000;55:56–67. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sreekumar R. The pattern of association of religious factors with subjective well being: A path analysis model. J Indian Academy Appl Psychol. 2008;34:119–125. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bargan A, McConatha JT. Religiosity and Life Satisfaction. Activ Adapt Aging. 2001;24:23–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Farooq N, Imam S. The effect of religiosity on locus of control. (Unpublished Masters thesis). Dept of Psychology, Govt College University, Lahore, Pakistan; 1997.
  • 10. Fatima I, Khalid R. Belief in just world and subjective well being in mothers of normal and down syndrome children.( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Dept of Psychology, Govt College University, Lahore, Pakistan; 2010.
  • 11.Fry PS. Religious involvement, spirituality and personal meaning for life: Existential predictors of psychological wellbeing in community-residing and institutional care elders. Aging Ment Health. 2001;4:375–387. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Suhail K, Chaudhary HR. Predictors of subjective well-being in an eastern muslim culture. J Social Clinical Psychol. 2004;23:359–376. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Gull F, Dawood S. Religiosity, social support, coping strategies and subjective well being among people living in old homes. (Unpu-blished Mphil thesis). Center for Clinical Psych-ology, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan; 2012.
  • 14.Lewis CA, Maltby J, Day L. Religious orientation, religious coping and happiness among UK adults. Personal Individual Diff. 2005;38:1193–1202. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Health Promotion Perspectives are provided here courtesy of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES