Abstract
Tendrils may be said to possess a sense of touch, and the direction and amplitude of the coiling response can be used to define the characteristics of this sense. These characteristics are, first, that the tendril will coil only in response to ventral mechanical stimulation, that this coiling can be inhibited by subsequent dorsally presented stimulation, and that dorsal stimulation alone causes no coiling. This phenomenon seems to be due to some asymmetry in the response system. Second, the nature of the response is always determined by the location (i.e., dorsal or ventral) of the last stimulation the tendril experienced. Third, the ability of dorsally presented stimulation to reverse ventrally stimulated coiling is gradually lost. Complete escape from reversibility is attained if the interval between ventral and dorsal stimulation reaches 9 minutes. Fourth, the magnitude of response is determined by both the number and the frequency of the stimuli. Both ventrally stimulated coiling and dorsally stimulated inhibition of coiling can be temporarily stopped by a 9-minute cold break at 10 C, given immediately after stimulation. As soon as the tendrils are restored to room temperature, they proceed to respond to the stimulus.
The pulling ability of the tendrils generated by contact coiling, as measured by an electronic monitoring system, is of the order of 6 milligrams per minute. Whenever these two factors have been compared, pulling weight parallels contact coiling, regardless of treatment.
The relationship between the stimulus and the response appears to follow rules very similar to those followed by various sensory response systems in animals. It is therefore proposed that many of these systems may have functional characteristics in common.
Full text
PDF
Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Ebrey T. G., Clayton R. K. Phycomyces: stimulus storage in light-initiated reactions. Science. 1969 Apr 25;164(3878):427–428. doi: 10.1126/science.164.3878.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- GRAY J. A., SATO M. Properties of the receptor potential in Pacinian corpuscles. J Physiol. 1953 Dec 29;122(3):610–636. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1953.sp005025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- JIELOF R., SPOOR A., DE VRIES H. The microphonic activity of the lateral line. J Physiol. 1952 Feb;116(2):137–157. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jaffe M. J., Galston A. W. Physiological Studies on Pea Tendrils. II. The Role of Light and ATP in Contact Coiling. Plant Physiol. 1966 Sep;41(7):1152–1158. doi: 10.1104/pp.41.7.1152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jaffe M. J., Galston A. W. Physiological Studies on Pea Tendrils. III. ATPase Activity and Contractility Associated with Coiling. Plant Physiol. 1967 Jun;42(6):845–847. doi: 10.1104/pp.42.6.845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jaffe M. J., Galston A. W. Physiological Studies on Pea Tendrils. IV. Flavonoids and Contact Coiling. Plant Physiol. 1967 Jun;42(6):848–850. doi: 10.1104/pp.42.6.848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jaffe M. J., Galston A. W. Physiological studies on pea tendrils. I. Growth and coiling following mechanical stimulation. Plant Physiol. 1966 Jun;41(6):1014–1025. doi: 10.1104/pp.41.6.1014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jaffe M. J., Galston A. W. Physiological studies on pea tendrils. V. Membrane changes and water movement associated with contact coiling. Plant Physiol. 1968 Apr;43(4):537–542. doi: 10.1104/pp.43.4.537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]