Abstract
The Mouse Phenome Database (MPD; phenome.jax.org) was launched in 2001 as the data coordination center for the international Mouse Phenome Project. MPD integrates quantitative phenotype, gene expression and genotype data into a common annotated framework to facilitate query and analysis. MPD contains >3500 phenotype measurements or traits relevant to human health, including cancer, aging, cardiovascular disorders, obesity, infectious disease susceptibility, blood disorders, neurosensory disorders, drug addiction and toxicity. Since our 2012 NAR report, we have added >70 new data sets, including data from Collaborative Cross lines and Diversity Outbred mice. During this time we have completely revamped our homepage, improved search and navigational aspects of the MPD application, developed several web-enabled data analysis and visualization tools, annotated phenotype data to public ontologies, developed an ontology browser and released new single nucleotide polymorphism query functionality with much higher density coverage than before. Here, we summarize recent data acquisitions and describe our latest improvements.
INTRODUCTION
The importance of animal models, and in particular the mouse, has been firmly established for basic and translational research. The laboratory mouse is especially powerful because thousands of inbred and genetically modified strains are currently available and more are being created and phenotyped (1,2); there is a reference genome and several mouse strains are fully sequenced (3,4); commercial genotyping arrays are available; experimental conditions can be precisely controlled; and defined interventions can be performed that cannot be ethically or practically performed on humans.
The past several decades of scientific literature are replete with experiments and findings involving various genetically diverse strains of mice. Phenotype measurements are summarized in publications; however, the primary data are often not typically published or easily accessible. The availability of well-curated standardized measurement data is essential for integrative studies and systems genetics. To support these research efforts, we collect and integrate mouse strain survey data procured from public databases or contributed by members of the scientific community. The Mouse Phenome Database (MPD; phenome.jax.org) serves as a central data repository and houses quantitative phenotype data, gene expression data and genotype data. Data analysis and visualization tools are provided through a web interface. Protocols, experimental conditions and animal environmental history accompany each data set.
Convenient access to annotated and standardized strain data provides essential baseline information and enables investigators to choose appropriate strains for many research applications. For example, a researcher interested in a classical inbred strain such as DBA/2J can use MPD to find typical DBA/2J values for body weight, cholesterol, heart rate or many other phenotypes; to see how DBA/2J responds to alcohol, cocaine or a high-fat diet; to determine the DBA/2J genotype in a region of interest; or to find gene expression probesets where DBA/2J is an outlier.
Our primary activity has been collecting mouse strain survey data sets, where mice from 10 to 40 (or more) strains are tested following a defined protocol under controlled conditions, females and males analyzed separately, with sample sizes as high as feasible. As MPD’s original focus was on collecting baseline measurement data for inbred strains, the database does not yet contain a significant amount of quantitative data on individual mutants, other manipulated lines, or outbred mice. However, we have shifted data acquisition priorities to track with research trends in the community and are starting to accommodate phenotype data from these strain types and emerging panels such as Collaborative Cross (CC) lines and Diversity Outbred (DO) populations. Another vital part of our mission is to provide a home base for data sets supported by investments made by the NIH and other funding sources. Over 270 investigators from 14 countries have contributed data and are supported by ∼130 funding agencies and research foundations worldwide, including all institutes of the NIH. In this manuscript, we present a status report of our current data content, review updates and improvements made since our last NAR update (5) and discuss future plans.
CONTENTS
MPD current contents are shown in Table 1. MPD contains baseline, intervention and aging data for >200 projects involving several genetic reference populations, including inbred, recombinant inbred (RI), chromosome substitution strains, Hybrid Mouse Diversity Panel (HMDP), F1 hybrids, Collaborative Cross lines (CC) and Diversity Outbred mice (DO). The HMDP is a large panel of ∼100 strains (30 classical inbred, 70 RI) (6,7). CC lines are RI strains derived from eight founder inbred strains (including three wild-derived inbred strains) (8,9). DO mice are an outbred population, derived from incipient CC (pre-CC) lines at early stages of breeding (10–12). At the request of the community, MPD is accessioning data from these new strain panels, which are powerful research tools for complex trait analysis and high-resolution mapping (13).
Table 1.
Strains | 1330+ |
Collaborative Cross (emerging lines) | 35% |
Recombinant inbred lines | 25% |
Inbred strains | 23% |
F1 hybrids (including CC diallel) | 10% |
Chromosome substitution strains | 4% |
Other | 3% |
Diversity Outbred population (number of mice) | [283] |
Phenotype (200+projects) | 3500+ |
Baseline measurements | 68% |
Treatment and intervention measurements | 32% |
Gene Expression (13 sources) | |
Number of distinct probe IDs (thousand) | 125+ K |
Number of data points (million) | ∼12 M |
Genotype (18 data sets) | |
SNP calls (billion) | 1.8+ B |
Indel calls (million) | 18+ M |
Structural variant calls (thousand) | ∼600 K |
Total genome-wide locations represented (million) | 60+ M |
Over 1330 strains of mice are represented in MPD where phenotypic, gene expression or genotypic data are available. Table 1 shows the percentage of each strain type (count does not include DO mice). There are significantly more strains than previously reported (at 750 strains) because of the recent inclusion of data from pre-CC lines. MPD houses data for >3500 phenotype measurements. MPD’s genotype database is a consolidation of data from 18 community sources containing strain calls for 1.8 + billion single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), 18 + million indels and 600 000 structural variants. Genotypic variation is represented at 60 + million genome-wide locations. The MPD gene expression sector contains ∼12 million mean data points from 13 projects, representing 125 000 probesets.
In addition to strain data, MPD houses an extensive library of detailed validated protocols, which users can access and use to compare their own experimental results. Most data sets are directly associated with a peer-reviewed publication, providing an important layer of data validation.
DATA UPDATES
Phenotype
Over 70 phenotyping and gene expression projects have been incorporated and released since our last NAR update and more are forthcoming. New data (physiology, 79%; behavior, 18%; and morphology, 3%) are classified by phenotype category and intervention/treatment, as shown in Table 2. New strain panels include HMDP, DO mice and CC lines. MPD houses pre-CC data from five projects covering a wide range of phenotypic domains: behavior, blood chemistry, hematology, body weight, body composition, exercise and endurance, response to viral infection (H1N1), kidney function, energy balance, nociception, reproductive performance and sleep patterns (14–23). We also have a growing collection of F1-diallel data from CC founder strains (15,24–26). Regarding DO data, we recently accessioned the first data set for behavioral and nociception traits (11,27). All phenotype data can be downloaded for custom analyses through the ‘Download data’ link on the homepage (left menu, Figure 1).
Table 2.
MPD Categories with new data | |
Behavior—anxiety-related | |
Behavior—attentional performance | |
Behavior—exploratory | |
Behavior—fear conditioning | |
Behavior—impulsivity | |
Behavior—locomotor activity | |
Behavior—reversal learning | |
Behavior—stress reactivity | |
Blood—clinical chemistry | |
Blood—erythrocyte function | |
Blood—hematology | |
Blood—lipids | |
Blood—serum vitamin D levels | |
Body composition | |
Body weight, size | |
Bone mineral density | |
Cancer | |
Cardiovascular—blood pressure | |
Cardiovascular—ECG | |
Cardiovascular—heart rate | |
Disease susceptibility | |
Drug metabolism | |
Endocrine—thyroxine | |
Energy balance | |
Immune system—peripheral blood lymphocytes | |
Immune system—plasma immunoglobulins | |
Immune system—splenocyte populations | |
Ingestive preference—taste threshold (NaCl) | |
Liver—function | |
Liver—gene expression | |
Macrophage gene expression | |
Nervous system—brain morphology | |
Nervous system—cell proliferation | |
Nervous system—hippocampal microRNA expression | |
Nervous system—infarct volume | |
Nervous system—sensorimotor gating | |
Nervous system—status epilepticus | |
Neurosensory—eye morphology | |
Neurosensory—hearing loss | |
Nociception | |
Pathology | |
Reproduction—gestation | |
Reproduction—performance | |
Respiratory—lung disease | |
Sleep | |
Urinalysis | |
Vesico-uteric reflux (newborns) | |
Treatment and intervention studies with new data | |
Cocaine | |
DB289 (anti-parasitic drug) | |
Dopamine antagonists | |
Ethanol | |
Nicotine | |
Pilocarpine | |
Aging | |
Exercise | |
High-fat diet | |
Influenza A (H1N1) | |
Influenza A (H5N1) | |
Staphylococcus aureus | |
Radiation |
Genotype
Since our last report, the coverage of SNP and variation data (indels and structural variants) for inbred strains has increased from roughly 12–60 million genomic locations due to data released by the Wellcome Trust Sanger Mouse Genomes Project (www.sanger.ac.uk/resources/mouse/genomes/). MPD collects and integrates genotype data; this requires keeping multiple evolving annotation layers and data sets all up-to-date and in sync. Since our last NAR update, new mouse reference assembly build (GRCm38) and dbSNP annotation builds 137 and 138 have been released. MPD is currently up-to-date for all builds.
Gene expression
MPD brings together about a dozen gene expression microarray data sets and provides some related web-based analysis tools (with several data sets and new tools added since our last report). Challenges include accommodating the mixture of platforms and annotation standards, working with static annotation files given the shifting landscape mentioned earlier in the text for genotype data, finding commonality across various complex study designs and dealing with the presence of low-sample sizes as well as other issues commonly encountered in microarray studies. To help alleviate some of these issues, we derive an overall variability metric for each probeset and provide an option that allows instances with too much variance to be omitted from results at users’ discretion.
IMPROVEMENTS
Web site updates
Search, navigation, layout and style updates have been applied to all areas of the web application. See Figure 1 and examples later in the text. Measurement plots and summary table formats have been updated and options reorganized. The ‘Pheno toolbox’ demo and ‘Tutorial videos’ showcase essential MPD functionality; see homepage, left menu (Figure 1). New tutorials include finding data and information about strains, explaining the suite of MPD tools, using the MPD shopping cart to collect a set of measurements of interest, getting the most out of ontologies, understanding gene expression functionality and finding genotype data and using associated tools.
Measurement annotations and ontology implementation
All phenotype measurements in our database have had value-added annotations applied to improve the ability of researchers to find, retrieve and aggregate similar data from across diverse studies. As a result, phenotype data are now more easily located when investigating a specific intervention, phenotyping methodology or ontology term. Data and information can also be found through searches and by browsing. For example, ‘Interventions’ and ‘Methodologies’ can be browsed, as shown in Figure 1. Our interventions page has been restructured and trade name equivalents have been added for all drugs to our existing catalog of synonyms (chemicals, toxic substances, biological factors, etc). Measurements have also been annotated to a controlled vocabulary of methodology (apparatus, platform). The ‘Methodologies’ page is organized by phenotype subject area, as shown in Figure 1.
MPD measurements have been annotated with multiple public ontologies. The Vertebrate Trait Ontology (VT) provides a standardized vocabulary to facilitate comparison of trait data within and across vertebrate species. VT is a hierarchy of terms defined as ‘measurable or observable characteristics’ related to the morphology, physiology or development of an organism (28). The Mammalian Phenotype Ontology (MP) is a tool for classifying and organizing phenotypic information associated with a mammalian species (29). The Adult Mouse Anatomical Dictionary (MA) is used to annotate and integrate data associated with mouse anatomical sites or structures (30). The use of these ontologies provides an effective way to link data from disparate sources and to facilitate convergent integration across species. MPD users can peruse the new ontology browser to locate measurements of interest, as illustrated in Figure 2. The ontology browser can be found under the ‘Phenotype’ button on the homepage (Figure 1).
New visualization tools for Collaborative Cross lines and Diversity Outbred populations
We have extended functionality and developed new tools for CC lines and DO mice. The CC tool renders mean and standard error for all strains tested with founder strains highlighted, as shown in Figure 3. The ability to visualize data from all strains in a single view enables users to select optimal strains for their specific research applications. The DO tool renders a distribution histogram with founder-strain mean and standard error shown above the plot, as shown in Figure 4. For both CC and DO tools, users can access data tables and go deeper for more statistical information, including standard deviation, standard error, range, coefficient of variation and Z-score. Data tables may be downloaded with a single click. A phenotype characterization catalog (representing 600 + measurements) is now available for the eight CC founder strains (which are the same as DO founder strains). This functionality is accessible under the ‘Strains’ button on the homepage (Figure 1) and then through ‘Strain Panels’.
New SNP/genotype variation query and improved gene detail pages
We have replaced MPD’s former SNP functionality with a new genotype variation resource, as illustrated in Figure 5. A number of new data sets are included that can be combined for query. Improvements include the following new features:
Lists of gene symbols, markers or rs numbers are supported in the query
Flanking regions may be selected for queries involving gene symbols, markers or rs numbers
Results tables include a column indicating distance (in bp) offset from gene symbol, marker or rs number used in the query
Indels and structural variants can be queried and displayed in results
SNPs and indels are linked to dbSNP rs numbers and variation-effect annotations
Links are provided to raw data via the Wellcome Trust Sanger Web site and to dbSNP through rs number
The improved SNP/genotype variation application guides users in a multistep process (see Figure 5 legend). From the SNP results page, it is possible to collect a list of genes from the query to help narrow the list of candidates or to perform batch queries in other databases. Users can download any SNP query result. We manually fulfill investigator requests for SNP data sets that are too large to retrieve on the web (contact us phenome@jax.org).
Gene detail pages now provide more information and links to relevant content within the MPD application and to other online resources, as shown in Figure 5. One new feature is that nearby genes and markers are shown directly on gene detail pages with a one-click option to expand the view to ±50 kb and subsequent wider intervals.
INTEGRATION WITH OTHER DATABASES
Data are imported regularly for annotation purposes: mouse strain nomenclature, genome coordinates and gene nomenclature from Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI) (32); ontology terms and structures from MGI and the VT ontology group (28); and variation-effect annotations from NCBI dbSNP (36). MPD provides convenient linkouts to several community resources. See Table 3 for a listing of Web sites that we rely on for authoritative annotations and/or to which we link; see also several examples in Figures 2 and 5. Connectivity enables bioinformatics approaches and facilitates workflows for users across platforms. MPD is also registered with the Neuroscience Information Framework (37) and is participating in a Thomson Reuters initiative to link publications and downloadable data sets (38).
Table 3.
Database | URL | References |
---|---|---|
Genome | ||
Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI) | informatics.jax.org | 31 |
NCBI dbSNP | ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP | 36 |
Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute | sanger.ac.uk/resources/mouse | |
Ensembl | ensembl.org | 39 |
Rat Genome Database | rgd.mcw.edu | 32 |
Knock-out consortia | ||
International Knockout Mouse Consortium (IKMC) | knockoutmouse.org | 2 |
International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium (IPMC) | mousephenotype.org | 1 |
Ontologies | ||
Mammalian Phenotype (MP) | informatics.jax.org/searches/MP_form.shtml | 29 |
Adult Mouse Anatomy (MA) | informatics.jax.org/searches/anatdict_form.shtml | 30 |
Gene Ontology (GO) | informatics.jax.org/searches/GO_form.shtml | 40 |
Vertebrate Trait (VT) | bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/1659 | 28 |
Other Biological | ||
International Mouse Strain Resource (IMSR) | findmice.org | 41 |
Mouse Tumor Biology Database (MTB) | tumor.informatics.jax.org | 42 |
QTL Archive (Churchill Group at JAX) | qtlarchive.org | |
GeneWeaver | geneweaver.org | 33 |
BioGPS | biogps.org | 43 |
NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) | ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo | 36 |
Pathbase | pathbase.net | |
UCLA ZARLAB for EMMA analysis | whap.cs.ucla.edu/mpd | |
Strains | ||
JAXMice | jaxmice.jax.org | |
Charles River Laboratories | criver.com | |
Harlan Laboratories | harlan.com | |
Taconic | taconic.com | |
Mouse Genetic Resource (Japan) | shigen.nig.ac.jp | |
RIKEN BioResource Center (Japan) | brc.riken.jp/lab/animal | |
Animal Resources Center (Australia) | arc.wa.gov.au |
FUTURE PLANS
The original focus of MPD on a diverse set of several dozen commonly used inbred strains is still seen as valuable but over time is being superseded by other genetic reference populations, such as RI panels, chromosome substitution strains and most recently the emerging CC lines and DO mice. We will continue to collect data from these genetic reference populations. In addition, we plan to accommodate quantitative phenotype data for mutant strains. Characterization activities (phenotyping, genotyping, expression studies) are in progress by several groups in the community, and we are working to collect these data and provide analysis tools and strain–panel-specific navigation modes.
DATA SUBMISSION
We invite investigators to submit their mouse strain data for evaluation; send inquiries to us at phenome@jax.org. Measurement descriptions and units are required along with a detailed protocol (a publication describing the experiment and procedures will suffice). Phenotyping projects are evaluated and loaded into a password-protected area for investigator preview. We work with investigators to best present their projects, and data are slated for public release soon thereafter. Note that it is not a prerequisite that a study be published in a peer-reviewed journal before posting data on the MPD Web site; however, a publication provides a valuable layer of data validation for MPD users. Contributing investigators are encouraged to mention MPD in their publications, stating that MPD is a public repository for their primary data, and to provide MPD accession numbers in their articles. See ‘Contributing data’ on the homepage, left menu (Figure 1). Contact us if you are interested in contributing data (phenome@jax.org)
USER SUPPORT AND DEVELOPER NOTES
We have made access to the MPD help desk more visible throughout the application and continue our commitment to a one-business day response. We offer user support via email (phenome@jax.org) and provide a suggestion box (can be used anonymously); see homepage, left menu (Figure 1). Our collection of tutorials has been updated with a new set of instructional videos to help users with basic functions; see homepage, left menu (Figure 1).
CITING MPD
For general citations of MPD or the Mouse Phenome Project, this NAR article may be referenced. In addition, the following citation format is preferred when referring to specific data sets:
Investigator(s) name (year project posted) Project title. MPD project symbol (e.g. Collins1) and/or accession number (MPD:XXX). Mouse Phenome Database Web site. The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor ME, USA. URL: phenome.jax.org. Date of download or access.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank participating investigators for contributing their data for worldwide access. The authors appreciate the critical review of this manuscript by Dale Begley and Debbie Krupke.
FUNDING
National Institutes of Health [DA028420, AG038070, CA034196]. Funding for open access charge: NIH [DA028420].
Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
REFERENCES
- 1.Brown SD, Moore MW. The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium: past and future perspectives on mouse phenotyping. Mamm. Genome. 2012;23:632–640. doi: 10.1007/s00335-012-9427-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ringwald M, Iyer V, Mason JC, Stone KR, Tadepally HD, Kadin JA, Bult CJ, Eppig JT, Oakley DJ, Briois S, et al. The IKMC web portal: a central point of entry to data and resources from the International Knockout Mouse Consortium. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:D849–D855. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yalcin B, Adams DJ, Flint J, Keane TM. Next-generation sequencing of experimental mouse strains. Mamm. Genome. 2012;23:490–498. doi: 10.1007/s00335-012-9402-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wong K, Bumpstead S, Van Der Weyden L, Reinholdt LG, Wilming LG, Adams DJ, Keane TM. Sequencing and characterization of the FVB/NJ mouse genome. Genome Biol. 2012;13:R72. doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-8-r72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Maddatu TP, Grubb SC, Bult CJ, Bogue MA. Mouse Phenome Database (MPD) Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D887–D894. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ghazalpour A, Rau CD, Farber CR, Bennett BJ, Orozco LD, van Nas A, Pan C, Allayee H, Beaven SW, Civelek M, et al. Hybrid mouse diversity panel: a panel of inbred mouse strains suitable for analysis of complex genetic traits. Mamm. Genome. 2012;23:680–692. doi: 10.1007/s00335-012-9411-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.van Nas A, Pan C, Ingram-Drake LA, Ghazalpour A, Drake TA, Sobel EM, Papp JC, Lusis AJ. The systems genetics resource: a web application to mine global data for complex disease traits. Front. Genet. 2013;4:84. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2013.00084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Collaborative Cross Consortium. The genome architecture of the Collaborative Cross mouse genetic reference population. Genetics. 2012;190:389–401. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.132639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Welsh CE, Miller DR, Manly KF, Wang J, McMillan L, Morahan G, Mott R, Iraqi FA, Threadgill DW, de Villena FP. Status and access to the Collaborative Cross population. Mamm. Genome. 2012;23:706–712. doi: 10.1007/s00335-012-9410-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Churchill GA, Gatti DM, Munger SC, Svenson KL. The Diversity Outbred mouse population. Mamm. Genome. 2012;23:713–718. doi: 10.1007/s00335-012-9414-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Logan RW, Robledo RF, Recla JM, Philip VM, Bubier JA, Jay JJ, Harwood C, Wilcox T, Gatti DM, Bult CJ, et al. High-precision genetic mapping of behavioral traits in the diversity outbred mouse population. Genes Brain Behav. 2013;12:424–437. doi: 10.1111/gbb.12029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Svenson KL, Gatti DM, Valdar W, Welsh CE, Cheng R, Chesler EJ, Palmer AA, McMillan L, Churchill GA. High-resolution genetic mapping using the Mouse Diversity outbred population. Genetics. 2012;190:437–447. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.132597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Flint J, Eskin E. Genome-wide association studies in mice. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012;13:807–817. doi: 10.1038/nrg3335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chesler EJ, Philip VM, Voy BH. Multi-System Assessment of 8 Inbred Founder Strains and 380+ Emerging Lines (pre-CC) of the Collaborative Cross. 2011 MPD:Chesler3, Mouse Phenome Database, Bar Harbor, ME. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Philip VM, Sokoloff G, Ackert-Bicknell CL, Striz M, Branstetter L, Beckmann MA, Spence JS, Jackson BL, Galloway LD, Barker P, et al. Genetic analysis in the Collaborative Cross breeding population. Genome Res. 2011;21:1223–1238. doi: 10.1101/gr.113886.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Collins FS. Hematological Parameters in 8 Inbred Founder Strains and 130+ Emerging Lines (pre-CC) of the Collaborative Cross. 2012 MPD:Collins1, Mouse Phenome Database, Bar Harbor, ME. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kelada SN, Aylor DL, Peck BC, Ryan JF, Tavarez U, Buus RJ, Miller DR, Chesler EJ, Threadgill DW, Churchill GA, et al. Genetic analysis of hematological parameters in incipient lines of the Collaborative Cross. G3 (Bethesda) 2012;2:157–165. doi: 10.1534/g3.111.001776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.DiPetrillo K. Urine Albumin and Creatinine in Males of 7 Inbred Founder Strains and 150+ Emerging Lines (pre-CC) of the Collaborative Cross. 2012 MPD:DiPetrillo1, Mouse Phenome Database, Bar Harbor, ME. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Thaisz J, Tsaih SW, Feng M, Philip VM, Zhang Y, Yanas L, Sheehan S, Xu L, Miller DR, Paigen B, et al. Genetic analysis of albuminuria in collaborative cross and multiple mouse intercross populations. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 2012;303:F972–F981. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00690.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ferris MT, Bottomly D, McWeeney SK, Heise MT. Host Response to Influenza A in 8 Inbred Founder Strains and 150+ Emerging Lines (pre-CC) of the Collaborative Cross. 2012 MPD:Ferris1, Mouse Phenome Database, Bar Harbor, ME. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ferris MT, Aylor DL, Bottomly D, Whitmore AC, Aicher LD, Bell TA, Bradel-Tretheway B, Bryan JT, Buus RJ, Gralinski LE, et al. Modeling host genetic regulation of influenza pathogenesis in the collaborative cross. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003196. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mathes WF. Energy Balance Traits in 8 Inbred Founder Strains and 170+ Emerging Lines (pre-CC) of the Collaborative Cross. 2011 doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00707.2010. MPD:Mathes1, Mouse Phenome Database, Bar Harbor, ME. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mathes WF, Aylor DL, Miller DR, Churchill GA, Chesler EJ, de Villena FP, Threadgill DW, Pomp D. Architecture of energy balance traits in emerging lines of the Collaborative Cross. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011;300:E1124–E1134. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00707.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chesler EJ, Philip VM, Voy BH. Multi-System Assessment of 8 Inbred Founder Strains and 54 F1 Hybrids of the Collaborative Cross. 2011 MPD:Chesler2, Mouse Phenome Database, Bar Harbor, Maine USA. Accessed September 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Svenson KL, Lenarcic AB, Churchill GA, Valdar W. Multi-System Survey of Mouse Physiology in 8 Inbred Founder Strains and 54 F1 Hybrids of the Collaborative Cross. 2012 MPD: CGDpheno3, Mouse Phenome Database, Bar Harbor, ME. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lenarcic AB, Svenson KL, Churchill GA, Valdar W. A general Bayesian approach to analyzing diallel crosses of inbred strains. Genetics. 2012;190:413–435. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.132563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Logan RW, Robledo RF, Recla JM, Chesler EJ. Behavioral and Nociception Traits in a Diversity Outbred (DO) Mouse Population and 8 Founder Inbred Strains. 2013 doi: 10.1111/gbb.12029. MPD:Chesler4, Mouse Phenome Database, Bar Harbor, ME. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Park CA, Bello SM, Smith CL, Hu ZL, Munzenmaier DH, Nigam R, Smith JR, Shimoyama M, Eppig JT, Reecy JM. The Vertebrate Trait Ontology: a controlled vocabulary for the annotation of trait data across species. J. Biomed. Semantics. 2013;4:13. doi: 10.1186/2041-1480-4-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Smith CL, Eppig JT. The Mammalian Phenotype Ontology as a unifying standard for experimental and high-throughput phenotyping data. Mamm. Genome. 2012;23:653–668. doi: 10.1007/s00335-012-9421-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hayamizu TF, Mangan M, Corradi JP, Kadin JA, Ringwald M. The Adult Mouse Anatomical Dictionary: a tool for annotating and integrating data. Genome Biol. 2005;6:R29. doi: 10.1186/gb-2005-6-3-r29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bult CJ, Eppig JT, Blake JA, Kadin JA, Richardson JE. The Mouse Genome Database: genotypes, phenotypes, and models of human disease. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D885–D891. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Laulederkind SJ, Hayman GT, Wang SJ, Smith JR, Lowry TF, Nigam R, Petri V, de Pons J, Dwinell MR, Shimoyama M, et al. The Rat Genome Database 2013: data, tools and users. Brief Bioinform. 2013;14:520–526. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbt007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Baker EJ, Jay JJ, Bubier JA, Langston MA, Chesler EJ. GeneWeaver: a web-based system for integrative functional genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D1067–D1076. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Portugal GS, Gould TJ. Drug Study: Effects of Acute and Chronic Nicotine on Fear Conditioning and Other Behaviors in Males of 8 Inbred Mouse Strains. 2011 MPD:Gould2, Mouse Phenome Database, Bar Harbor, ME. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Portugal GS, Wilkinson DS, Kenney JW, Sullivan C, Gould TJ. Strain-dependent effects of acute, chronic, and withdrawal from chronic nicotine on fear conditioning. Behav. Genet. 2012;42:133–150. doi: 10.1007/s10519-011-9489-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.NCBI Resource Coordinators. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D8–D20. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cachat J, Bandrowski A, Grethe JS, Gupta A, Astakhov V, Imam F, Larson SD, Martone ME. A survey of the neuroscience resource landscape: perspectives from the neuroscience information framework. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2012;103:39–68. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-388408-4.00003-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Torres-Salinas D, Martin-Martin A, Fuente-Gutierrez E. An introduction to the coverage of the Data Citation Index (Thomson-Reuters): disciplines, documents types and repositories. EC3. 2013;11 [Google Scholar]
- 39.Flicek P, Ahmed I, Amode MR, Barrell D, Beal K, Brent S, Carvalho-Silva D, Clapham P, Coates G, Fairley S, et al. Ensembl 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D48–D55. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gene Ontology Consortium. Gene Ontology annotations and resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D530–D535. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Eppig JT, Blake JA, Bult CJ, Kadin JA, Richardson JE. The Mouse Genome Database (MGD): comprehensive resource for genetics and genomics of the laboratory mouse. Nucleic Acids Re. 2012;40:D881–D886. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Krupke DM, Begley DA, Sundberg JP, Bult CJ, Eppig JT. The Mouse Tumor Biology database. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2008;8:459–465. doi: 10.1038/nrc2390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wu C, Macleod I, Su AI. BioGPS and MyGene.info: organizing online, gene-centric information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D561–D565. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]