Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013 Nov 27;1841(3):353–361. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2013.11.009

Role of cholesterol sulfate in epidermal structure and function: Lessons from X-linked ichthyosis

Peter M Elias a,*, Mary L Williams b, Eung-Ho Choi c, Kenneth R Feingold d
PMCID: PMC3966299  NIHMSID: NIHMS544744  PMID: 24291327

Abstract

X-linked ichthyosis is a relatively common syndromic form of ichthyosis most often due to deletions in the gene encoding the microsomal enzyme, steroid sulfatase, located on the short area of the X chromosome. Syndromic features are mild or unapparent unless contiguous genes are affected. In normal epidermis, cholesterol sulfate is generated by cholesterol sulfotransferase (SULT2B1b), but desulfated in the outer epidermis, together forming a ‘cholesterol sulfate cycle’ that potently regulates epidermal differentiation, barrier function and desquamation. In XLI, cholesterol sulfate levels my exceed 10% of total lipid mass (≈1% of total weight). Multiple cellular and biochemical processes contribute to the pathogenesis of the barrier abnormality and scaling phenotype in XLI. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled The Important Role of Lipids in the Epidermis and their Role in the Formation and Maintenance of the Cutaneous Barrier. Guest Editors: Kenneth R. Feingold and Peter Elias.

Keywords: Epidermal barrier function, Epidermal lipid metabolism, Cholesterol sulfate, Corneodesmosomes, Steroid sulfatase, X-linked ichthyosis

1. Introduction

X-linked ichthyosis (XLI) (OMIM #308100) is due to loss-of-function mutations in the gene that encodes the microsomal enzyme, steroid sulfatase (SSase; STS) [15]. Female carriers rarely exhibit a skin phenotype [6,7], probably because the region of the X chromosome where STS resides escapes X-inactivation. Affected males present at birth, or shortly thereafter, with generalized peeling or exaggerated neonatal desquamation, although some may exhibit a collodion membrane [8,9].

2. Clinical features

After the neonatal period, fine scaling persists on the trunk and extremities, but over time, scales often become coarser and darker. While scaling is generalized, it typically spares the anticubital and popliteal fossae, palms, soles, and the mid-face, but the lateral face, axillae and the neck always remain involved.

The clinical features of XLI bear some similarities to ichthyosis vulgaris (IV), a common, autosomal semi-dominant trait caused by mutations in the filaggrin gene. However, the darker color of the scale and its more ‘centripetal’ distribution, as well as the sparing of the palms and soles, point to a clinical diagnosis of XLI [9]. Yet, in the absence of an X-linked pedigree, phenotypic overlap with other mild-to-moderate ichthyosis requires further studies to definitively establish the diagnosis of XLI. Moreover, because IV and the xerosis associated with atopic dermatitis (AD) are both quite common, the two disorders may co-exist, producing a more severe phenotype in affected patients [1012]. Indeed, both of these disorders are relatively-common (XLI occurs in 1:1,800; filaggrin mutations occur in up to 10% of the European population). In a recent series of 11 Korean XLI patients, 7 had a prior history of atopic disease, while only one displayed flexural involvement, a reliable clinical marker of AD. Thus, filaggrin represents a genetic modifier of the XLI phenotype.

Routine histopathology in XLI typically shows moderate hyperkeratosis with mild acanthosis and partial accentuation of the granular cell layer. While these features are nonspecific, they can help to exclude IV or filaggrin-deficient AD, which should instead display decreased keratohyalin granules. Measurement of substrate accumulation in skin (cholesterol sulfate) or blood (cholesterol sulfate or other sulfated steroid hormones) is diagnostic, as is the assay of SSase activity in epidermis [13,14], cultured fibroblasts, or leukocytes [15,16]. Serum lipoprotein electrophoresis is also diagnostic, demonstrating more rapid mobility of the LDL (beta) and pre-LDL (pre-beta) fractions due to an increase in sulfated sterol content [15,17]; however, this assay is no longer widely available. Because most XLI cases arise from deletion of the STS gene [1826], fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis is commonly employed for diagnosis of XLI and its carrier state [27], but FISH testing provides false negatives in XLI patients who have point mutations (≈10% of affected XLI subjects).

3. Syndromic features of XLI

XLI is considered a systemic, albeit usually mild, syndromic disorder [28]. Placental sulfatase deficiency syndrome (PSD), which occurs in pregnancies of XLI fetuses, can manifest as failure of labor either to initiate or to progress, defective cervical softening, and a poor response to exogenous pitocin. PSD syndrome can be detected prior to the development of these complications by low maternal urinary and blood estriol levels due to the placenta’s (a largely fetal structure) failure to desulfate estrone sulfate [19,29,30]. Since maternal estriol levels are part of the so-called ‘triple screen’ employed to detect pregnancies at risk for trisomies 18/21, Smith–Lemli–Opitz syndrome, and neural tube defects, many XLI fetuses are now detected in this manner [3134].

In contrast to earlier estimates, the incidence of cryptorchidism (testicular maldescent) does not appear to exceed 5–10% [35,36]. Moreover, earlier reports of testicular cancer in a few XLI patients with normally descended testes [37] have not been confirmed as a true association. These associations instead could be due to a contiguous gene syndrome, with loss of pseudouridine-phosphate phosphatase [38]. Small, entirely asymptomatic, comma-shaped corneal opacities develop in the posterior capsule of Descemet’s membrane in ≈ 25% of adult XLI patients, but these often are not present in affected children. But when present, these opacities are diagnostic, and some female carriers display similar opacities [9,36]. A small number of XLI patients have developed nephrotic syndrome, attributable to the deleterious effects of excessive cholesterol sulfate on glomerular cell function [38]. Finally, in recent reports, as many as 40% of XLI patients demonstrated cognitive behavioral abnormalities, such as attention-deficit disorder [39,40], but the actual incidence may be closer to 25%. These abnormalities have been attributed to altered sterol metabolism in the central nervous system [4042]. Inactivation of SSase increases aggressive behavior in rodents [43], providing some further support for this new association.

Because the STS locus lies on the distal tip of the short arm of the X chromosome, deletion of this locus is often accompanied by additional deletions of flanking regions, resulting in a series of in contiguous gene syndromes. In these instances, XLI males present with an ichthyosiform phenotype in the setting of multisystem disease [4447]. One commonly reported association is with Kallman’s syndrome, displaying anosmia, hypogonadism. Mental retardation, linked to deletions in the neighboring VCX gene has also been observed [4850], as have contiguous gene syndromes with chondrodysplasia punctata, autism cerebellar ataxia, and albinism. In one large series, 8% of STS-deficient fetuses exhibited deletions of additional contiguous genes [51].

4. Molecular Biology and Regulation of SSase

SSase (EC 3.1.6.2, arylsulfatase-C) is a member of a superfamily of 12 different mammalian sulfatases that hydrolyze alkyl steroid sulfates (e.g., dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate [DHEAs]) and aryl steroid sulfates (e.g., estrone sulfate) to their unconjugated forms (Fig. 1). The STS gene that encodes SSase, which is located distally on the short arm of the X chromosome, consists of 10 exons that span 146 kb, while the cDNA encodes a protein with 583 amino acids, as well as four potential glycosylation sites [52]. The promoter region of the SSase gene is unusual in that it resembles neither a housekeeping gene nor other tightly-regulated genes, and also lacks binding sites for Sp1 and other common transcription factors [53]. It is located proximal to the portion of the gene that encodes enzyme expression, but the promoter sequence varies in a tissue-specific fashion [54]. While cytokines such as TNFα and IL-6 upregulate enzyme activity, IL-1β instead reportedly downregulates SSase activity [55], although IL-1β (as well as interferon γ) reportedly down-regulate SSase expression by inhibiting NFkB, while activating the glucocorticoidreceptor [55]. Finally, both retinoids and 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D3 induce both SSase activity and expression [56].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Steroid sulfatase desulfates cholesterol sulfate and other sulfated steroid hormones (modified from Elias, et al., 2010.).

5. Enzyme characteristics and epidermal localization

SSase is a 65 kDa microsomal enzyme that localizes to the endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi, and endosomal membranes, including coated pits (but not in lysosomes) of placenta and several other tissues [52,57,58]. A key feature of SSase is that exogenous substrates, such as estrone sulfate [59] and cholesterol sulfate [60], induce enzyme activity. In addition, specific, high-affinity sterol sulfate transporters can be activated by their substrates [61].

In normal epidermis, SSase protein and enzyme activity are low in the basal and lower spinous layers, but both increase in the outer nucleated cell layers, where they peak in the granular layer [14]. Enzyme activity persists into the stratum corneum, where it continues to desulfate cholesterol sulfate, contributing to the pool of cholesterol available to form the extracellular lamellar bilayers (Figs. 2 & 3). In ultra-structural cytochemical studies, SSase activity localizes not only within the cytosol, but also within lamellar bodies, followed by its exocytosis from lamellar bodies into the interstices of the lower stratum corneum [62] (Fig. 3). Thus, SSase, like other lipid hydrolases that are involved in the processing of polar lipids to more hydrophobic species in the stratum corneum, utilizes the lamellar body secretory system to reach the extracellular domain, where it can participate in the regulation of permeability barrier homeostasis and desquamation [63]. In contrast to SSase, cholesterol sulfate exploits its extreme amphilicity to diffuse into the extracellular domains from the cytosol of granular cells ([64]; see also below). Finally, while we are focusing here on cholesterol sulfate, epidermal SSase also could increase the bioavailability of androgens not only in epidermis, but also in hair follicles [65,66], where it has been implicated in the pathogenesis of androgenetic alopecia [67].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Epidermal Functions Impacted by Cholesterol Sulfate Cycle (modified from Elias, et al., 2004, 2010).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Steroid sulfatase (SSase) activity in lamellar bodies (B) in stratum granulosum (SG) and within the extracellular spaces of the stratum corneum (SC) (A, arrows). Method for cytochemical detection of SSase activity can be found in Ref. #62, Elias, et al., 2004).

6. Cholesterol sulfotransferase

Cytosolic sulfotransferases (SULTs) represent a superfamily of enzymes that catalyze the sulfoconjugation of hormones, neurotransmitters, drugs, xenobiotics, and sterols [68,69]. The SULT superfamily of enzymes is composed of five families, of which the SULT2 family is primarily responsible for the sulfation of endogenous steroids and sterols. The SULT2 family is further divided into SULT2A1 and SULT2B1. SULT2A1 catalyzes the conversion of DHEA to DHEA sulfate and is commonly referred to as DHEA sulfotransferase. The SULT2B1 subfamily consists of two isoforms, SULT2B1a and SULT2B1b, derived from the same gene via differential splicing. The SULT2B1a isoform preferentially sulfonates pregnenolone, but not cholesterol, while SULT2B1b preferentially catalyzes the conversion of cholesterol to cholesterol sulfate. Thus, the SULT2B1b isoform accounts for the majority of cholesterol sulfotransferase activity. The human SULT2B1b gene is localized to chromosome 19, where it encodes a protein that contains 365 amino acids [69].

In the epidermis and in keratinocytes SULT2B1b is expressed, while neither SULT2B1a nor SULT2A1 is observed by either PCR or Western blotting [70]. The expression of SULT2B1b and cholesterol sulfotransferase activity increases in keratinocytes subjected to calcium-induced differentiation [70]. Using immunocytochemistry, SULT2B1b is observed in both the basal and suprabasal layers of the epidermis [70,71]. Retinoic acid, which inhibits differentiation, also inhibits cholesterol sulfotransferase activity, while PPARα, PPARβ/d, PPARg, and LXR activators, which stimulate differentiation, instead increase SULT2Blb expression and cholesterol sulfotransferase activity [7274]. Similarly, TPA and TNF, which also stimulate keratinocyte differentiation, increase cholesterol sulfotransferase activity [7476]. Finally, both EGF and IGF-1 have been shown to increase cholesterol sulfotransferase activity in keratinocytes [75].

Cholesterol sulfotransferase (SULT2B1b) activity generates cholesterol sulfate in the lower nucleated cell layers of the epidermis, while in contrast SSase peaks in the outer epidermis (stratum corneum) (Fig. 2). Hence, Epstein et al. [77] proposed that an ‘epidermal cholesterol sulfate cycle’ exists in the epidermis in which cholesterol is first sulfated in the lower epidermis, and then desulfated back to cholesterol in the outer epidermis. Thus, the epidermal content of cholesterol sulfate increases from 1% to 5% of total lipid as nucleated epidermal cells move from the basal to the granular layer and then declines again to 1% as corneocytes move, from inner to outer stratum corneum (SC) [78,79] (Fig. 2). Disruption of this cholesterol sulfate cycle accounts for both the abnormal desquamation, as well as the permeability barrier abnormality in XLI (see below).

7. ‘Cholesterol sulfate cycle’ and its regulatory significance

Cholesterol sulfotransferase (SULT2B1b) activity generates cholesterol sulfate predominately in the lower nucleated cell layers of the epidermis, while in contrast SSase peaks in the outer epidermis (Fig. 2). Epstein et al. (1984) proposed an ‘epidermal cholesterol sulfate cycle’ in which cholesterol is first sulfated in the lower epidermis, and then desulfated back to cholesterol in the outer epidermal nucleated layers. Thus, cholesterol sulfate increases from 1% to 5% of the total lipid content as nucleated epidermal cells move from the basal to the granular layer and then declines again to 1% as corneocytes move, from inner to outer stratum corneum (SC) [78,79] (Fig. 2). Disruption of this cholesterol sulfate cycle accounts for both the abnormal desquamation, as well as the permeability barrier abnormality, in XLI (see below).

Sulfation of cholesterol by cholesterol sulfotransferase (SULT2B1b) is intimately linked to epidermal differentiation [79,80,81] and formation of the stratum corneum [70,72,82]. Not only does the content of cholesterol sulfate and the activity of cholesterol sulfotransferase increase with keratinocyte differentiation (vide supra), levels of cholesterol sulfate are much higher in keratinizing vs. mucosal epithelia [81]. Conversely, reversal of keratinization (through induction of mucous metaplasia in keratinizing epithelia, following application of exogenous retinoids) dramatically reduces tissue cholesterol sulfate levels [72,83]. Moreover, both SULT2B16 expression and cholesterol sulfate levels increase late in epidermal development in utero [84,85], in parallel with the formation of a functionally-competent stratum corneum [86].

The increase in cholesterol sulfate that occurs in conjunction with keratinocyte differentiation may not be just a marker of differentiation but may in fact be a signaling molecule that plays a role in inducing keratinocyte differentiation. Adding cholesterol sulfate to keratinocytes in culture or overexpressing SULT2B1b, which increases cholesterol sulfate formation, stimulates keratinocyte differentiation [87,88]. Cholesterol sulfate is a potent transcriptional regulator in both cutaneous and extracutaneous tissues [68,69], stimulating epidermal differentiation by several mechanisms (Fig. 4): 1) It activates the η isoform of protein kinase C (PKC) [8991], which in turn stimulates the phosphorylation of epidermal structural proteins, while also increasing cornified envelope formation. 2) it is a transcriptional regulator of several proteins involved in cornified envelope formation, such as transglutaminase 1 (TGM1) and involucrin, operating through an AP-1 binding site in the promoter region of these proteins [92,93]. Hanley et al demonstrated that cholesterol sulfate increased the expression of Fra-1, Fra-2, and Jun D, members of the AP-1 family of transcription factors. It is likely that these two mechanisms are linked, because PKC activation by cholesterol sulfate could phosphorylate AP-1 transcription factors, leading to enhanced transcriptional regulation of differentiation-linked proteins, such as TG-1 and involucrin [94] (Fig. 4). 3) recent studies have shown that cholesterol sulfate induces the expression of filaggrin through the induction of RORα [88]. Cholesterol sulfate both increases the expression of RORα and serves as a ligand for RORα increasing its transcriptional activity. Together, these observations provide biochemical and molecular mechanisms whereby cholesterol sulfate could impact epidermal differentiation.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Potential Pathogenetic Mechanisms In X-linked Ichthyosis (modified from Elias, et al., 2004, 2010).

While the above studies demonstrate that the addition of cholesterol sulfate stimulates keratinocyte differentiation recent studies have further shown a physiologic role for cholesterol sulfate formation in regulating keratinocyte differentiation. Shimada and colleagues used shRNA to down regulate the expression of SULT2B1b in keratinocytes in culture demonstrated that concomitant with a decrease in cholesterol sulfate levels there was a decrease in involucrin expression. Furthermore, using shRNA they were able to demonstrate that decreasing SULT2B1b expression in mouse epidermis also reduced involucrin expression [87]. As described above TPA treatment of keratinocytes or mouse skin stimulates both SULT2B1b and involucrin expression. If keratinocytes in culture or mouse skin are treated with shRNA to prevent the TPA induced increase in SULT2B1b the ability of TPA to increase involucrin expression is markedly blunted. Together these observations suggest that the formation of cholesterol sulfate in the epidermis may not only be a marker of differentiation but may also be an important signaling molecule.

8. Basis for the phenotype in XLI

Likely because cholesterol sulfate levels are an order of magnitude higher in epidermis than in blood [15,16], that the skin phenotype in XLI is more prominent than that in other organs [95]. Whereas in normal stratum corneum, cholesterol sulfate levels decline from ≈5% to abou ≈1% of lipid mass in the outer SC [14,78,96] (Fig. 2), in XLI, cholesterol sulfate is 10–12% of the lipids in the stratum corneum [14,95]. Because lipids as a group account for ≈10% of the dry weight of stratum corneum, ≈1% of tissue mass in XLI is cholesterol sulfate!

While most extracellular lipids and enzymes in the SC are delivered via the secretion of lamellar body contents, cholesterol sulfate is not concentrated in lamellar bodies [62,97]. Its mode of delivery to the stratum corneum interstices is uncertain, but it is likely that this highly amphiphilic molecule can move across cell membranes by simple diffusion, preferentially partitioning into the lipid-enriched extracellular domains [64].

Alternatively, cholesterol sulfate could be actively delivered from the stratum granulosum cells into the extracellular space by specific transporters that are known to transport sulfated conjugates of lipophilic compounds (ABCC1, ABCC3, and/or ABCC4 [MRP1, MRP3, MRP4]) [98]. These transporters are expressed in keratinocytes and the level of expression has been shown to increase with differentiation [99].

Lamellar body density and content appear normal in XLI, as are the corneodesmosomes in the lower stratum corneum. The key ultrastructural features that explain the ichthyosiform phenotype in XLI include: i) the persistence of “pristine” corneodesmosomes, with little evidence of degradation in the outer layer of the stratum corneum (Figs. 4 & 5), leading to an abnormally cohesive SC and secretion, while ii) disruption of the lamellar bilayers opens a pathway for the outward diffusion of water. The presence of frequent, focal sites of electron-dense, non-lamellar material disorganizes the extracellular lamellae [62,100] (Fig. 6). A defective permeability barrier would in turn stimulate epidermal hyperplasia, resulting in the formation of additional layers of corneocytes. These two processes together likely explain the hyperker-atotic phenotype in XLI.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Pathogenesis of X-Linked Ichthyosis (modified from Elias, et al., 2010).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Extracellular Matrix Abnormalities in XLI. A: Ruthenium tetroxide postfixation, which revels lamellar/non-lamellar (electron-dense) phase separation; and B: Ca ++ leakage into the SC interstices (consistent with barrier abnormality) where it localizes to the external faces of corneodesmosomes (pyroantimonate precipitation method for Ca++ detection). Mag bars = 0.2 μm (A) and 0.1 μm (B). (Modified from Elias, et al., 2010.)

9. Basis for the permeability barrier abnormality in XLI

While patients with XLI display only a mild barrier abnormality under basal conditions [101103], the kinetics of barrier recovery slow significantly following acute perturbations [100], suggesting that the excess cholesterol sulfate in the stratum corneum in XLI destabilizes permeability barrier homeostasis. In support of this hypothesis, excess cholesterol sulfate forms non-lamellar domains in both model lipid mixtures [104,105], and in XLI scale [106] (Fig. 6). Yet, the barrier abnormality in XLI could also be due in part to the decreased cholesterol content of the stratum corneum in XLI (reduced by approximately 50%) [95] (Fig. 5). In experimental animals, a comparable decrease in cholesterol results in formation of abnormal extracellular lamellar membranes, producing a barrier abnormality [107]. This decrease in cholesterol content of XLI SC may be due to a reduced generation of cholesterol from cholesterol sulfate [100,108], and/or to cholesterol sulfate-mediated inhibition of HMGCoA reductase, the rate-limiting enzyme of cholesterol synthesis [108] (Fig. 5). In summary, the dominant mechanisms that account for the barrier abnormality in XLI appear to be: 1) lamellar/non-lamellar phase separation due to excess cholesterol sulfate; and 2) reduced cholesterol content of the stratum corneum lamellar membranes [62]. While more severe barrier defects in other ichthyoses result in marked epidermal hyperplasia and inflammation, the lesser abnormality in XLI provokes little epidermal hyperplasia or inflammation. This minimal pathology is supported by molecular assay studies that show very few genes are altered in the epidermis of XLI patients [103].

10. Cellular mechanisms account for abnormal desquamation in XLI

Kinetic studies have demonstrated that the hyperkeratosis in XLI largely reflects delayed desquamation [109]. The basis for this classic, retention-type of ichthyosis is persistence of corneodesmosomes at all levels of the SC (Fig. 5). Two key serine proteases, kallikrein 7 (Klk 7, SC chymotryptic enzyme [SCCE]) and kallikrein 5 (Klk 5, SC tryptic enzyme [SCTE]) mediate the initial stages of corneodesmosome degradation [110]. Cholesterol sulfate increases SC retention through its known function as a serine protease inhibitor [62,111,112] (Fig. 5). Moreover, while the acidic pH of stratum corneum inhibits Klk 5 and 7 activities [113115], the pH of the stratum corneum in XLI is even more acidic than normal [116], further reducing Klk activity in the SC of patients with XLI [62].

The stratum corneum in XLI demonstrates abundant Ca++ in extracellular domains, which preferentially localizes along the external faces of opposing corneodesmosomes [62] (Fig. 6). Thus, the delayed degradation of corneodesmosomes in XLI could be due in part to leakage of Ca++ into the lower SC (due to the barrier defect), with formation of Ca++ bridges between adjacent corneodesmosomes [62]. If Ca++ is present in sufficient quantities, it could stabilize the highly-anionic sulfate groups (from persistent cholesterol sulfate) in the extracellular lipids [77]. Indeed, cholesterol sulfate-containing liposomes aggregate avidly in the presence of Ca++ [117,118]. Thus, multiple mechanisms likely contribute to the abnormal desquamation in XLI (Fig. 5).

11. Conclusions

X-linked ichthyosis is an inherited syndromic disorder in which an ichthyosiform phenotype predominates. A broad array of extracutaneous tissue may be affected, but these features are often unapparent or extremely mild, except when continuous genes are affected. The cutaneous clinical phenotype can be explained by the impact of excess cholesterol sulfate on epidermal differentiation and lipid synthesis, as well as on the organization of the lamellar lipids that provide the permeability barrier, and the ability of this lipid to inhibit corneodesmosomes proteolysis. One of the paradoxes about XLI that is still not fully understood is the multiplicity of biological roles and pathological effects of cholesterol sulfate vs. the relative mildness of the clinical phenotype.

Acknowledgments

Ms. Joan Wakefield provided superb editing, organizational and graphics skills for this manuscript. This work was supported by NIH grant AR061106, and by the Medical Research Service, Department of Veterans Affairs.

Abbreviations

CSO4

cholesterol sulfate

FISH

fluorescence in situ hybridization

IV

ichthyosis vulgaris

Klk

kallikreins

PSD

placental sulfatase syndrome

SC

stratum corneum

SCCE

stratum corneum chymotryptic enzyme

SCTE

stratum corneum tryptic enzyme

SSase

STS, steroid sulfatase

SULT2B1b

cholesterol sulfotransferase

XLI

x-linked ichthyosis

Footnotes

This article is part of a Special Issue entitled The Important Role of Lipids in the Epidermis and their Role in the Formation and Maintenance of the Cutaneous Barrier. Guest Editors: Kenneth R. Feingold and Peter Elias.

These contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIAMS or NIH.

References

  • 1.Koppe G, Marinkovic-Ilsen A, Rijken Y, De Groot WP, Jobsis AC. X-linked icthyosis. A sulphatase deficiency. Arch Dis Child. 1978;53:803–806. doi: 10.1136/adc.53.10.803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Webster D, France JT, Shapiro LJ, Weiss R. X-linked ichthyosis due to steroid-sulphatase deficiency. Lancet. 1978;1:70–72. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)90005-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jobsis AC, De Groot WP, Tigges AJ, De Bruijn HW, Rijken Y, Meijer AE, Marinkovic-Ilsen A. X-linked ichthyosis and X-linked placental sulfatase deficiency: a disease entity. Histochemical observations. Am J Pathol. 1980;99:279–289. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tiepolo L, Zuffardi O, Rodewald A. Nullisomy for the distal portion of Xp in a male child with a X/Y translocation. Hum Genet. 1977;39:277–281. doi: 10.1007/BF00295420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mohandas T, Shapiro LJ, Sparkes RS, Sparkes MC. Regional assignment of the steroid sulfatase-X-linked ichthyosis locus: implications for a noninactivated region on the short arm of human X chromosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979;76:5779–5783. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.11.5779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Thauvin-Robinet C, Lambert D, Vaillant G, Caillier P, Donzel A, Cusin V, Huet F, Teyssier JR, Mugneret F, Faivre L. X-linked recessive ichthyosis in a girl: strategy for identifying the causal mechanism. Br J Dermatol. 2005;152:191–193. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06367.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nagtzaam IF, Stegmann AP, Steijlen PM, Herbergs J, Van Lent-Albrechts JA, Van Geel M, Van Steensel MA. Clinically manifest X-linked recessive ichthyosis in a female due to a homozygous interstitial 1.6-Mb deletion of Xp22.31. Br J Dermatol. 2012;166:905–907. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10685.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Oji V, Traupe H. Ichthyoses: differential diagnosis and molecular genetics. Eur J Dermatol. 2006;16:349–359. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Elias PM, Williams ML, Schmuth M, Crumrine D. Inherited clinical disorders of lipid metabolism. In: Elias PM, Williams ML, Schmuth M, Crumrine D, editors. Ichthyoses—clinical, biochemical, pathogenic and diagnostic assessment. Karger; Basel: 2010. pp. 30–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ramesh R, Chen H, Kukula A, Wakeling EL, Rustin MH, McLean WH. Exacerbation of X-linked ichthyosis phenotype in a female by inheritance of filaggrin and steroid sulfatase mutations. J Dermatol Sci. 2011;64:159–162. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2011.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gruber R, Janecke AR, Grabher D, Sandilands A, Fauth C, Schmuth M. Evidence for genetic modifiers other than filaggrin mutations in X-linked ichthyosis. J Dermatol Sci. 2010;58:72–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2010.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liao H, Waters AJ, Goudie DR, Aitken DA, Graham G, Smith FJ, Lewis-Jones S, McLean WH. Filaggrin mutations are genetic modifying factors exacerbating X-linked ichthyosis. J Invest Dermatol. 2007;127:2795–2798. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kubilus J, Tarascio AJ, Baden HP. Steroid-sulfatase deficiency in sex-linked ichthyosis. Am J Hum Genet. 1979;31:50–53. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Elias PM, Williams ML, Maloney ME, Bonifas JA, Brown BE, Grayson S, Epstein EHJ. Stratum corneum lipids in disorders of cornification. Steroid sulfatase and cholesterol sulfate in normal desquamation and the pathogenesis of recessive X-linked ichthyosis. J Clin Invest. 1984;74:1414–1421. doi: 10.1172/JCI111552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Epstein EH, Jr, Krauss RM, Shackleton CH. X-linked ichthyosis: increased blood cholesterol sulfate and electrophoretic mobility of low-density lipoprotein. Science. 1981;214:659–660. doi: 10.1126/science.6945674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bergner EA, Shapiro LJ. Metabolism of 3H-dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate by subjects with steroid sulphatase deficiency. J Inherit Metab Dis. 1988;11:403–415. doi: 10.1007/BF01800429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ibsen HH, Brandrup F, Secher B. Topical cholesterol treatment of recessive X-linked ichthyosis. Lancet. 1984;2:645. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)90642-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li XM, Yen P, Mohandas T, Shapiro LJ. A long range restriction map of the distal human X chromosome short arm around the steroid sulfatase locus. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990;18:2783–2788. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.9.2783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Shapiro LJ. Steroid sulfatase deficiency and the genetics of the short arm of the human X chromosome. Adv Hum Genet. 1985;14:331–381. 388–339. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-9400-0_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ballabio A, Parenti G, Carrozzo R, Sebastio G, Andria G, Buckle V, Fraser N, Craig I, Rocchi M, Romeo G, et al. Isolation and characterization of a steroid sulfatase cDNA clone: genomic deletions in patients with X-chromosome-linked ichthyosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987;84:4519–4523. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.13.4519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bonifas JM, Morley BJ, Oakey RE, Kan YW, Epstein EH., Jr Cloning of a cDNA for steroid sulfatase: frequent occurrence of gene deletions in patients with recessive X chromosome-linked ichthyosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987;84:9248–9251. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.24.9248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Conary JT, Lorkowski G, Schmidt B, Pohlmann R, Nagel G, Meyer HE, Krentler C, Cully J, Hasilik A, von Figura K. Genetic heterogeneity of steroid sulfatase deficiency revealed with cDNA for human steroid sulfatase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1987;144:1010–1017. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(87)80064-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gillard EF, Affara NA, Yates JR, Goudie DR, Lambert J, Aitken DA, Ferguson-Smith MA. Deletion of a DNA sequence in eight of nine families with X-linked ichthyosis (steroid sulphatase deficiency) Nucleic Acids Res. 1987;15:3977–3985. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.10.3977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shapiro LJ, Yen P, Pomerantz D, Martin E, Rolewic L, Mohandas T. Molecular studies of deletions at the human steroid sulfatase locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:8477–8481. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.21.8477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sugawara T, Nomura E, Hoshi N. Both N-terminal and C-terminal regions of steroid sulfatase are important for enzyme activity. J Endocrinol. 2006;188:365–374. doi: 10.1677/joe.1.06417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ghosh D. Mutations in X-linked ichthyosis disrupt the active site structure of estrone/DHEA sulfatase. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1739:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2004.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hosomi N, Fukai K, Tanaka A, Fujita H, Ishii M. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis is useful for the diagnosis of the carrier state of X-linked ichthyosis. Int J Dermatol. 2008;47:529–530. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2008.03406.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Oji V, Tadini G, Akiyama M, Blanchet Bardon C, Bodemer C, Bourrat E, Coudiere P, DiGiovanna JJ, Elias P, Fischer J, Fleckman P, Gina M, Harper J, Hashimoto T, Hausser I, Hennies HC, Hohl D, Hovnanian A, Ishida-Yamamoto A, Jacyk WK, Leachman S, Leigh I, Mazereeuw-Hautier J, Milstone L, Morice-Picard F, Paller AS, Richard G, Schmuth M, Shimizu H, Sprecher E, Van Steensel M, Taieb A, Toro JR, Vabres P, Vahlquist A, Williams M, Traupe H. Revised nomenclature and classification of inherited ichthyoses: results of the First Ichthyosis Consensus Conference in Soreze 2009. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;63:607–641. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bradshaw KD, Carr BR. Placental sulfatase deficiency: maternal and fetal expression of steroid sulfatase deficiency and X-linked ichthyosis. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1986;41:401–413. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lykkesfeldt G, Nielsen MD, Lykkesfeldt AE. Placental steroid sulfatase deficiency: biochemical diagnosis and clinical review. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;64:49–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.David M, Israel N, Merksamer R, Bar-Nizan N, Borochowitz Z, Bar-el H, Yehudai I, Dar H. Very low maternal serum unconjugated estriol and prenatal diagnosis of steroid sulfatase deficiency. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1995;10:76–79. doi: 10.1159/000264207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Schoen E, Norem C, O’Keefe J, Krieger R, Walton D, To TT. Maternal serum unconjugated estriol as a predictor for Smith–Lemli–Opitz syndrome and other fetal conditions. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:167–172. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00370-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Marcos J, Craig WY, Palomaki GE, Kloza EM, Haddow JE, Roberson M, Bradley LA, Shackleton CH. Maternal urine and serum steroid measurements to identify steroid sulfatase deficiency (STSD) in second trimester pregnancies. Prenat Diagn. 2009;29:771–780. doi: 10.1002/pd.2284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Craig WY, Palomaki G, Roberson M, Haddow JE. Further insights into implications of undetectable or very low unconjugated estriol in maternal serum during the second trimester. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31:616–618. doi: 10.1002/pd.2754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hernandez-Martin A, Gonzalez-Sarmiento R, De Unamuno P. X-linked ichthyosis: an update. Br J Dermatol. 1999;141:617–627. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.03098.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fernandes NF, Janniger CK, Schwartz RA. X-linked ichthyosis: an oculocutaneous genodermatosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62:480–485. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.04.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lykkesfeldt G, Hoyer H, Lykkesfeldt AE, Skakkebaek NE. Steroid sulphatase deficiency associated with testis cancer. Lancet. 1983;2:1456. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)90801-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mishra K, Batra VV, Basu S, Rath B, Saxena R. Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome associated with steroid sulfatase deficiency-x-linked recessive ichthyosis: a case report and review of literature. Eur J Pediatr. 2012;171:847–850. doi: 10.1007/s00431-012-1712-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Trent S, Dennehy A, Richardson H, Ojarikre OA, Burgoyne PS, Humby T, Davies W. Steroid sulfatase-deficient mice exhibit endophenotypes relevant to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012;37:221–229. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kent L, Emerton J, Bhadravathi V, Weisblatt E, Pasco G, Willatt LR, McMahon R, Yates JR. X-linked ichthyosis (steroid sulfatase deficiency) is associated with increased risk of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism and social communication deficits. J Med Genet. 2008;45:519–524. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2008.057729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Davies W. Does steroid sulfatase deficiency influence postpartum psychosis risk? Trends Mol Med. 2012;18:256–262. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2012.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bicikova M, Hill M, Ripova D, Mohr P, Hampl R. Determination of steroid metabolome as a possible tool for laboratory diagnosis of schizophrenia. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2013;133:77–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2012.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nicolas LB, Pinoteau W, Papot S, Routier S, Guillaumet G, Mortaud S. Aggressive behavior induced by the steroid sulfatase inhibitor COUMATE and by DHEAS in CBA/H mice. Brain Res. 2001;922:216–222. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(01)03171-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Schmickel RD. Contiguous gene syndromes: a component of recognizable syndromes. J Pediatr. 1986;109:231–241. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(86)80377-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Schnur RE, Trask BJ, van den Engh G, Punnett HH, Kistenmacher M, Tomeo MA, Naids RE, Nussbaum RL. An Xp22 microdeletion associated with ocular albinism and ichthyosis: approximation of breakpoints and estimation of deletion size by using cloned DNA probes and flow cytometry. Am J Hum Genet. 1989;45:706–720. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.de Vries B, Eussen B, van Diggelen O, van Der Heide A, Deelen W, Govaerts L, Lindhout D, Wouters C, Van Hemel J. Submicroscopic Xpter deletion in a boy with growth and mental retardation caused by a familial t(X;14) Am J Med Genet A. 1999;87:189–194. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19991119)87:2<189::aid-ajmg12>3.3.co;2-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Preumont A, Rzem R, Vertommen D, Van Schaftingen E. HDHD1, which is often deleted in X-linked ichthyosis, encodes a pseudouridine-5′-phosphatase. Biochem J. 2010;431:237–244. doi: 10.1042/BJ20100174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Cuevas-Covarrubias SA, Gonzalez-Huerta LM. Analysis of the VCX3A, VCX2 and VCX3B genes shows that VCX3A gene deletion is not sufficient to result in mental retardation in X-linked ichthyosis. Br J Dermatol. 2008;158:483–486. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08373.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hosomi N, Oiso N, Fukai K, Hanada K, Fujita H, Ishii M. Deletion of distal promoter of VCXA in a patient with X-linked ichthyosis associated with borderline mental retardation. J Dermatol Sci. 2007;45:31–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2006.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lesca G, Sinilnikova O, Theuil G, Blanc J, Edery P, Till M. Xp22.3 microdeletion including VCX-A and VCX-B1 genes in an X-linked ichthyosis family: no difference in deletion size for patients with and without mental retardation. Clin Genet. 2005;67:367–368. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2005.00417.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Langlois S, Armstrong L, Gall K, Hulait G, Livingston J, Nelson T, Power P, Pugash D, Siciliano D, Steinraths M, Mattman A. Steroid sulfatase deficiency and contiguous gene deletion syndrome amongst pregnant patients with low serum unconjugated estriols. Prenat Diagn. 2009;29:966–974. doi: 10.1002/pd.2326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Reed MJ, Purohit A, Woo LW, Newman SP, Potter BV. Steroid sulfatase: molecular biology, regulation, and inhibition. Endocr Rev. 2005;26:171–202. doi: 10.1210/er.2004-0003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Li XM, Alperin ES, Salido E, Gong Y, Yen P, Shapiro LJ. Characterization of the promoter region of human steroid sulfatase: a gene which escapes X inactivation. Somat Cell Mol Genet. 1996;22:105–117. doi: 10.1007/BF02369901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Nardi A, Pomari E, Zambon D, Belvedere P, Colombo L, Dalla Valle L. Transcriptional control of human steroid sulfatase. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2009;115:68–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2009.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hattori K, Yamaguchi N, Umezawa K, Tamura H. Interferon gamma induces steroid sulfatase expression in human keratinocytes. Biol Pharm Bull. 2012;35:1588–1593. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b12-00028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hughes PJ, Twist LE, Durham J, Choudhry MA, Drayson M, Chandraratna R, Michell RH, Kirk CJ, Brown G. Up-regulation of steroid sulphatase activity in HL60 promyelocytic cells by retinoids and 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Biochem J. 2001;355:361–371. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3550361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Willemsen R, Kroos M, Hoogeveen AT, van Dongen JM, Parenti G, van der Loos CM, Reuser AJ. Ultrastructural localization of steroid sulphatase in cultured human fibroblasts by immunocytochemistry: a comparative study with lysosomal enzymes and the mannose 6-phosphate receptor. Histochem J. 1988;20:41–51. doi: 10.1007/BF01745968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Dibbelt L, Herzog V, Kuss E. Human placental sterylsulfatase: immunocytochemical and biochemical localization. Biol Chem Hoppe Seyler. 1989;370:1093–1102. doi: 10.1515/bchm3.1989.370.2.1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Barth A, Romer W, Oettel M. Influence of subchronic administration of oestrone-3-O-sulphamate on oestrone sulphatase activity in liver, spleen and white blood cells of ovariectomized rats. Arch Toxicol. 2000;74:366–371. doi: 10.1007/s002040000129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Maloney ME, Williams ML, Epstein EH, Jr, Law MY, Fritsch PO, Elias PM. Lipids in the pathogenesis of ichthyosis: topical cholesterol sulfate-induced scaling in hairless mice. J Invest Dermatol. 1984;83:252–256. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12340321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Beck L, Mahfoudi A, Mularoni A, Nicollier M, Adessi GL. Progesterone stimulates sulfate uptake in subcultured endometrial epithelial cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1992;90:95–102. doi: 10.1016/0303-7207(92)90106-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Elias PM, Crumrine D, Rassner U, Hachem JP, Menon GK, Man W, Choy MH, Leypoldt L, Feingold KR, Williams ML. Basis for abnormal desquamation and permeability barrier dysfunction in RXLI. J Invest Dermatol. 2004;122:314–319. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.22258.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Elias PM, Menon GK. Structural and lipid biochemical correlates of the epidermal permeability barrier. Adv Lipid Res. 1991;24:1–26. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-024924-4.50005-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Ponec M, Williams ML. Cholesterol sulfate uptake and outflux in cultured human keratinocytes. Arch Dermatol Res. 1986;279:32–36. doi: 10.1007/BF00404355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hoffmann R, Rot A, Niiyama S, Billich A. Steroid sulfatase in the human hair follicle concentrates in the dermal papilla. J Invest Dermatol. 2001;117:1342–1348. doi: 10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01547.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hoffmann R. Enzymology of the hair follicle. Eur J Dermatol. 2001;11:296–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Pitts RL. Serum elevation of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate associated with male pattern baldness in young men. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987;16:571–573. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(87)70075-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Strott CA. Sulfonation and molecular action. Endocr Rev. 2002;23:703–732. doi: 10.1210/er.2001-0040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Strott CA, Higashi Y. Cholesterol sulfate in human physiology: what’s it all about? J Lipid Res. 2003;44:1268–1278. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R300005-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Higashi Y, Fuda H, Yanai H, Lee Y, Fukushige T, Kanzaki T, Strott CA. Expression of cholesterol sulfotransferase (SULT2B1b) in human skin and primary cultures of human epidermal keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol. 2004;122:1207–1213. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.22416.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Shimada M, Matsuda T, Sato A, Akase T, Matsubara T, Nagata K, Yamazoe Y. Expression of a skin cholesterol sulfotransferase, St2b2, is a trigger of epidermal cell differentiation. Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems. 2008;38:1487–1499. doi: 10.1080/00498250802488593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Jetten AM, George MA, Pettit GR, Herald CL, Rearick JI. Action of phorbol esters, bryostatins, and retinoic acid on cholesterol sulfate synthesis: relation to the multistep process of differentiation in human epidermal keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol. 1989;93:108–115. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12277374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Jiang YJ, Kim P, Elias PM, Feingold KR. LXR and PPAR activators stimulate cholesterol sulfotransferase type 2 isoform 1b in human keratinocytes. J Lipid Res. 2005;46:2657–2666. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M500235-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Jetten AM, George MA, Nervi C, Boone LR, Rearick JI. Increased cholesterol sulfate and cholesterol sulfotransferase activity in relation to the multi-step process of differentiation in human epidermal keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol. 1989;92:203–209. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12276731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kiguchi K, Kagehara M, Higo R, Iwamori M, DiGiovanni J. Alterations in cholesterol sulfate and its biosynthetic enzyme during multistage carcinogenesis in mouse skin. J Invest Dermatol. 1998;111:973–981. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1998.00404.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Matsuda T, Shimada M, Sato A, Akase T, Yoshinari K, Nagata K, Yamazoe Y. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha-nuclear factor-kappa B-signaling enhances St2b2 expression during 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-induced epidermal hyperplasia. Biol Pharm Bull. 2011;34:183–190. doi: 10.1248/bpb.34.183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Epstein EH, Williams ML, Elias PM. The epidermal cholesterol sulfate cycle. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1984;10:866–868. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(84)80144-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Long SA, Wertz PW, Strauss JS, Downing DT. Human stratum corneum polar lipids and desquamation. Arch Dermatol Res. 1985;277:284–287. doi: 10.1007/BF00509081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Rearick JI, Albro PW, Jetten AM. Increase in cholesterol sulfotransferase activity during in vitro squamous differentiation of rabbit tracheal epithelial cells and its inhibition by retinoic acid. J Biol Chem. 1987;262:13069–13074. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Rearick JI, Hesterberg TW, Jetten AM. Human bronchial epithelial cells synthesize cholesterol sulfate during squamous differentiation in vitro. J Cell Physiol. 1987;133:573–578. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041330320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Rearick JI, Jetten AM. Accumulation of cholesterol 3-sulfate during in vitro squamous differentiation of rabbit tracheal epithelial cells and its regulation by retinoids. J Biol Chem. 1986;261:13898–13904. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Williams ML, Rutherford SL, Ponec M, Hincenbergs M, Placzek DR, Elias PM. Density-dependent variations in the lipid content and metabolism of cultured human keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol. 1988;91:86–91. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12463297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Jetten AM, Brody AR, Deas MA, Hook GE, Rearick JI, Thacher SM. Retinoic acid and substratum regulate the differentiation of rabbit tracheal epithelial cells into squamous and secretory phenotype. Morphological and biochemical characterization. Lab Invest. 1987;56:654–664. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Kagehara M, Tachi M, Harii K, Iwamori M. Programmed expression of cholesterol sulfotransferase and transglutaminase during epidermal differentiation of murine skin development. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994;1215:183–189. doi: 10.1016/0005-2760(94)90109-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Hanley K, Jiang Y, Katagiri C, Feingold KR, Williams ML. Epidermal steroid sulfatase and cholesterol sulfotransferase are regulated during late gestation in the fetal rat. J Invest Dermatol. 1997;108:871–875. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12292586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Komuves LG, Hanley K, Jiang Y, Katagiri C, Elias PM, Williams ML, Feingold KR. Induction of selected lipid metabolic enzymes and differentiation-linked structural proteins by air exposure in fetal rat skin explants. J Invest Dermatol. 1999;112:303–309. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1999.00511.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Shimada M, Matsuda T, Sato A, Akase T, Matsubara T, Nagata K, Yamazoe Y. Expression of a skin cholesterol sulfotransferase, St2b2, is a trigger of epidermal cell differentiation. Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems. 2008;38:1487–1499. doi: 10.1080/00498250802488593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Hanyu O, Nakae H, Miida T, Higashi Y, Fuda H, Endo M, Kohjitani A, Sone H, Strott CA. Cholesterol sulfate induces expression of the skin barrier protein filaggrin in normal human epidermal keratinocytes through induction of RORalpha. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;428:99–104. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kashiwagi M, Ohba M, Chida K, Kuroki T. Protein kinase C eta (PKC eta): its involvement in keratinocyte differentiation. J Biochem (Tokyo) 2002;132:853–857. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a003297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Denning MF, Dlugosz AA, Williams EK, Szallasi Z, Blumberg PM, Yuspa SH. Specific protein kinase C isozymes mediate the induction of keratinocyte differentiation markers by calcium. Cell Growth Differ. 1995;6:149–157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Ikuta T, Chida K, Tajima O, Matsuura Y, Iwamori M, Ueda Y, Mizuno K, Ohno S, Kuroki T. Cholesterol sulfate, a novel activator for the eta isoform of protein kinase C. Cell Growth Differ. 1994;5:943–947. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Kawabe S, Ikuta T, Ohba M, Chida K, Ueda E, Yamanishi K, Kuroki T. Cholesterol sulfate activates transcription of transglutaminase 1 gene in normal human keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol. 1998;111:1098–1102. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1998.00441.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Hanley K, Wood L, Ng DC, He SS, Lau P, Moser A, Elias PM, Bikle DD, Williams ML, Feingold KR. Cholesterol sulfate stimulates involucrin transcription in keratinocytes by increasing Fra-1, Fra-2, and Jun D. J Lipid Res. 2001;42:390–398. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Kuroki T, Ikuta T, Kashiwagi M, Kawabe S, Ohba M, Huh N, Mizuno K, Ohno S, Yamada E, Chida K. Cholesterol sulfate, an activator of protein kinase C mediating squamous cell differentiation: a review. Mutat Res. 2000;462:189–195. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5742(00)00036-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Williams ML, Elias PM. Stratum corneum lipids in disorders of cornification: increased cholesterol sulfate content of stratum corneum in recessive x-linked ichthyosis. J Clin Invest. 1981;68:1404–1410. doi: 10.1172/JCI110391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Ranasinghe AW, Wertz PW, Downing DT, Mackenzie IC. Lipid composition of cohesive and desquamated corneocytes from mouse ear skin. J Invest Dermatol. 1986;86:187–190. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12284246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Grayson S, Johnson-Winegar AG, Wintroub BU, Isseroff RR, Epstein EH, Jr, Elias PM. Lamellar body-enriched fractions from neonatal mice: preparative techniques and partial characterization. J Invest Dermatol. 1985;85:289–294. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12276826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Konig J, Nies AT, Cui Y, Leier I, Keppler D. Conjugate export pumps of the multi-drug resistance protein (MRP) family: localization, substrate specificity, and MRP2-mediated drug resistance. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999;1461:377–394. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2736(99)00169-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Kielar D, Kaminski WE, Liebisch G, Piehler A, Wenzel JJ, Mohle C, Heimerl S, Langmann T, Friedrich SO, Bottcher A, Barlage S, Drobnik W, Schmitz G. Adenosine triphosphate binding cassette (ABC) transporters are expressed and regulated during terminal keratinocyte differentiation: a potential role for ABCA7 in epidermal lipid reorganization. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;121:465–474. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12404.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Zettersten E, Man MQ, Sato J, Denda M, Farrell A, Ghadially R, Williams ML, Feingold KR, Elias PM. Recessive x-linked ichthyosis: role of cholesterol-sulfate accumulation in the barrier abnormality. J Invest Dermatol. 1998;111:784–790. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1998.00386.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Lavrijsen AP, Oestmann E, Hermans J, Boddé HE, Vermeer BJ, Ponec M. Barrier function parameters in various keratinization disorders: transepidermal water loss and vascular response to hexyl nicotinate. Br J Dermatol. 1993;129:547–553. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1993.tb00482.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Johansen JD, Ramsing D, Vejlsgaard G, Agner T. Skin barrier properties in patients with recessive X-linked ichthyosis. Acta Derm Venereol. 1995;75:202–204. doi: 10.2340/0001555575198201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Hoppe T, Winge MC, Bradley M, Nordenskjold M, Vahlquist A, Berne B, Torma H. X-linked recessive ichthyosis: an impaired barrier function evokes limited gene responses before and after moisturizing treatments. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167:514–522. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10979.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Groen D, Poole DS, Gooris GS, Bouwstra JA. Investigating the barrier function of skin lipid models with varying compositions. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2011;79:334–342. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2011.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Rehfeld SJ, Plachy WZ, Williams ML, Elias PM. Calorimetric and electron spin resonance examination of lipid phase transitions in human stratum corneum: molecular basis for normal cohesion and abnormal desquamation in recessive X-linked ichthyosis. J Invest Dermatol. 1988;91:499–505. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12476654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Rehfeld SJ, Williams ML, Elias PM. Interactions of cholesterol and cholesterol sulfate with free fatty acids: possible relevance for the pathogenesis of recessive X-linked ichthyosis. Arch Dermatol Res. 1986;278:259–263. doi: 10.1007/BF00407734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Feingold KR, Man MQ, Menon GK, Cho SS, Brown BE, Elias PM. Cholesterol synthesis is required for cutaneous barrier function in mice. J Clin Invest. 1990;86:1738–1745. doi: 10.1172/JCI114899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Williams ML, Rutherford SL, Feingold KR. Effects of cholesterol sulfate on lipid metabolism in cultured human keratinocytes and fibroblasts. J Lipid Res. 1987;28:955–967. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Frost P, Weinstein GD, Van Scott EJ. The ichthyosiform dermatoses. II. Autoradiographic studies of epidermal proliferation. J Invest Dermatol. 1966;47:561–567. doi: 10.1038/jid.1966.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Ekholm IE, Brattsand M, Egelrud T. Stratum corneum tryptic enzyme in normal epidermis: a missing link in the desquamation process? J Invest Dermatol. 2000;114:56–63. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2000.00820.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Sato J, Denda M, Nakanishi J, Nomura J, Koyama J. Cholesterol sulfate inhibits proteases that are involved in desquamation of stratum corneum. J Invest Dermatol. 1998;111:189–193. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1998.00244.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Williams ML. Lipids in normal and pathological desquamation. Adv Lipid Res. 1991;24:211–262. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-024924-4.50012-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Hachem JP, Crumrine D, Fluhr J, Brown BE, Feingold KR, Elias PM. pH directly regulates epidermal permeability barrier homeostasis, and stratum corneum integrity/cohesion. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;121:345–353. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12365.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Hachem JP, Fowler A, Behne M, Fluhr J, Feingold K, Elias P. Increased stratum corneum pH promotes activation and release of primary cytokines from the stratum corneum attributable to activation of serine proteases. J Invest Dermatol. 2002;119:258. [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Hachem JP, Roelandt T, Schurer N, Pu X, Fluhr J, Giddelo C, Man MQ, Crumrine D, Roseeuw D, Feingold KR, Mauro T, Elias PM. Acute acidification of stratum corneum membrane domains using polyhydroxyl acids improves lipid processing and inhibits degradation of corneodesmosomes. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130:500–510. doi: 10.1038/jid.2009.249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Ohman H, Vahlquist A. The pH gradient over the stratum corneum differs in X-linked recessive and autosomal dominant ichthyosis: a clue to the molecular origin of the “acid skin mantle”? J Invest Dermatol. 1998;111:674–677. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1998.00356.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Abraham W, Wertz PW, Landmann L, Downing DT. Stratum corneum lipid liposomes: calcium-induced transformation into lamellar sheets. J Invest Dermatol. 1987;88:212–214. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12525375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Hatfield RM, Fung LW. A new model system for lipid interactions in stratum corneum vesicles: effects of lipid composition, calcium, and pH. Biochemistry. 1999;38:784–791. doi: 10.1021/bi981421k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES