Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1996 Apr 16;93(8):3675–3678. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.8.3675

The invariant system of coordinates of antibody molecules: prediction of the "standard" C alpha framework of VL and VH domains.

I M Gelfand 1, A E Kister 1, D Leshchiner 1
PMCID: PMC39670  PMID: 8622995

Abstract

A new approach of comparing protein structures that does not involve the procedure of superposition is suggested. An invariant system of coordinates for immunoglobulin molecules that is based on the geometrical symmetry inherent to the variable domain light-chain (VL)-heavy-chain (VH) complex is described. The coordinates of the Calpha atoms in 22 immunoglobulin structures are calculated in the invariant system of coordinates. We found that 76 identical positions in this Calpha framework are symmetrical about the twofold axis. Comparison of the identical positions in these molecules allows us to select 96 positions in the light chains and 87 positions in the heavy chains whose Calpha atom coordinates are approximately the same. To check whether the average coordinates of Calpha atoms in these positions complies with the stereochemical requirements, we calculated Calpha-Calpha distances. Seventy-three positions of the light chains and 72 positions of the heavy chains satisfy the Calpha-Calpha distance criterion. The Calpha atoms in these positions are used for constructing the "standard" Calpha framework of VL and VH complexes. The average coordinates of Calpha atoms are presented.

Full text

PDF
3675

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Diamond R. On the multiple simultaneous superposition of molecular structures by rigid body transformations. Protein Sci. 1992 Oct;1(10):1279–1287. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560011006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gerstein M., Altman R. B. Average core structures and variability measures for protein families: application to the immunoglobulins. J Mol Biol. 1995 Aug 4;251(1):161–175. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Harpaz Y., Chothia C. Many of the immunoglobulin superfamily domains in cell adhesion molecules and surface receptors belong to a new structural set which is close to that containing variable domains. J Mol Biol. 1994 May 13;238(4):528–539. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Holm L., Sander C. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J Mol Biol. 1993 Sep 5;233(1):123–138. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Matthews B. W., Rossmann M. G. Comparison of protein structures. Methods Enzymol. 1985;115:397–420. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(85)15029-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nussinov R., Wolfson H. J. Efficient detection of three-dimensional structural motifs in biological macromolecules by computer vision techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Dec 1;88(23):10495–10499. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.23.10495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Shapiro A., Botha J. D., Pastore A., Lesk A. M. A method for multiple superposition of structures. Acta Crystallogr A. 1992 Jan 1;48(Pt 1):11–14. doi: 10.1107/s010876739100867x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Taylor W. R., Orengo C. A. Protein structure alignment. J Mol Biol. 1989 Jul 5;208(1):1–22. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90084-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES