Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1971 Apr;47(4):545–550. doi: 10.1104/pp.47.4.545

Response to Selenium by Callus Cultures Derived from Astragalus Species

Nancy K Ziebur 1, A Shrift 1
PMCID: PMC396723  PMID: 16657657

Abstract

Callus cultures were obtained from five selenium accumulator and three nonaccumulator species of Astragalus. Their morphological characteristics and their growth responses to light, sucrose, kinetin, and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid are described. Calluses derived from accumulator species characteristically retained their tolerance to high concentrations of selenate and selenite, whereas calluses derived from nonaccumulator species were markedly inhibited by these two forms of selenium. Competition between sulfate and selenate was demonstrated. The two types of calluses could not be distinguished on the basis of 75Se-labeled selenate or selenite uptake. Neutron activation analysis failed to show differences in selenium content between the two types of calluses grown on media to which no selenium had been added.

Full text

PDF
545

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Broyer T. C., Lee D. C., Asher C. J. Selenium nutrition of green plants. Effect of selenite supply on growth and selenium content of alfalfa and subterranean clover. Plant Physiol. 1966 Nov;41(9):1425–1428. doi: 10.1104/pp.41.9.1425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Trelease S. F. IDENTIFICATION OF SELENIUM INDICATOR SPECIES OF ASTRAGALUS BY GERMINATION TESTS. Science. 1942 Jun 26;95(2478):656–657. doi: 10.1126/science.95.2478.656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ulrich J. M., Shrift A. Selenium absorption by excised Astragalus roots. Plant Physiol. 1968 Jan;43(1):14–20. doi: 10.1104/pp.43.1.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Virupaksha T. K., Shrift A. Biochemical differences between selenium accumulator and non-accumulator Astragalus species. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1965 Aug 24;107(1):69–80. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(65)90389-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES