Skip to main content
PMC home page
International Journal of Oral Science logoLink to International Journal of Oral Science
. 2013 Dec 20;6(1):46–49. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2013.95

Residual activity of cetrimide and chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis-infected root canals

Carmen María Ferrer-Luque 1, María Teresa Arias-Moliz 2, Matilde Ruíz-Linares 1, María Elena Martínez García 1, Pilar Baca 1
PMCID: PMC3967309  PMID: 24357857

Abstract

Effective final irrigation regimen is an important step in order to achieve better disinfection and ensure residual antimicrobial effects after root canal preparation. The aim of this study was to compare the residual antimicrobial activity of 0.2% cetrimide, and 0.2% and 2% chlorhexidine in root canals infected with Enterococcus faecalis. Biofilms of E. faecalis were grown on uniradicular roots for 4 weeks. After root canal preparation, root canals were irrigated with 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) to remove the smear layer. The roots were randomly divided into three experimental groups (n=26) according to the final irrigating solution: Group I, 5 mL 0.2% cetrimide; Group II, 5 mL 0.2% chlorhexidine; and Group III, 5 mL 2% chlorhexidine. Samples were collected for 50 days to denote the presence of bacterial growth. The proportion of ungrown specimens over 50 days was evaluated using the nonparametric Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Differences among groups were tested using the log-rank test and the level of statistical significance was set at P<0.05. The highest survival value was found with 2% chlorhexidine, showing statistically significant differences from the other two groups. At 50 days, E. faecalis growth was detected in 69.23% specimens in Groups I and II, and in 34.61% specimens of Group III. There were no significant differences between 0.2% cetrimide and 0.2% chlorhexidine. Final irrigation with 2% chlorhexidine showed greater residual activity than 0.2% chlorhexidine and 0.2% cetrimide in root canals infected with E. faecalis.

Keywords: antimicrobial effects, biofilms, cetrimide, chlorhexidine, Enterococcus faecalis, final irrigation, residual activity

Introduction

The success of endodontic therapy is directly related with the control of endodontic microbiota during root canal treatment.1 Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) is the main irrigating solution used in root canal preparation to dissolve vital and necrotic tissue and eliminate the bacteria of instrumented root canals,2,3 but it lacks residual antimicrobial activity.4 Chelating agents are used to remove debris and smear layer from instrumented root canals;5,6 their residual activity on root canals infected with Enterococcus faecalis has been demonstrated.7

Chlorhexidine, a potent antiseptic agent, is recommended as a final irrigating solution in view of its antimicrobial action,8 proven substantivity9 and capacity to inhibit the adherence of certain bacteria to dentin.10 Cetrimide is a cationic surfactant with bactericidal activity11 and the capacity to decrease the biofilm's mechanical stability.12 Solutions of 2% chlorhexidine and 0.2% cetrimide, when applied for 1 min alone or in final irrigation protocols, can completely inhibit the 24-h E. faecalis biofilm formation in dentin,13 while the combination of 2% chlorhexidine+0.2% cetrimide after the use of chelating agents14 has been proposed as an effective alternative for final irrigation in root canals because of its antimicrobial action over time.

It was recently shown that 0.2% cetrimide provides longer substantivity than 0.2% chlorhexidine and nearly as long as that of 2% chlorhexidine in a dentin-volumetric model.15 Nonetheless, there are no data about its antimicrobial activity and ability over time to control bacterial regrowth when used alone as the final irrigating solution after root canal preparation. The aim of this study was therefore to compare the residual antimicrobial activity of 0.2% cetrimide with 0.2% and 2% chlorhexidine in root canals infected with E. faecalis.

Materials and methods

Eighty-six anterior human teeth stored in 0.1% thymol solution at 4 °C were decoronated to obtain roots 12 mm in length. This study was conducted using a protocol previously approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Granada. A customized model of each tooth was made.14 Each root and its corresponding model were autoclaved at 121 °C. After sterilization, the specimens were incubated in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (Scharlau Chemie S.A., Barcelona, Spain) for 24 h at 37 °C to ensure no bacterial contamination.

From a subculture of E. faecalis (ATCC 29212), a standard suspension was prepared in BHI to obtain 1×107 colony-forming units (CFU) per mL. Afterwards, 1.2 mL of this suspension and the sterilized tooth were added to an Eppendorf tube and were incubated for 4 weeks under aerobic conditions at 37 °C, with re-inoculation performed every seven days. The cultures were checked for purity by Gram stain and colony morphology, and two samples were processed to confirm the presence of E. faecalis biofilm by scanning electron microscopy.

The working length was established for each tooth by introducing a #10 K-file (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) into the canal until it was observed at the apical foramen, then decreasing the file length by 1 mm. The apexes of the teeth were sealed with cyanoacrylate. Each tooth was then inserted into its customized model and the interface was sealed with cyanoacrylate. The root canals were instrumented using the ProTaper system to working length using a F3 master apical file (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), following the manufacturers' instructions. During preparation, 1 mL of 5.25% NaOCl was applied after each file.

Once instrumented, the roots were irrigated with 5 mL 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution to remove the smear layer. The roots were then randomly divided into three experimental groups (n=26) according to the final irrigating solution: Group I, 5 mL 0.2% cetrimide; Group II, 5 mL 0.2% chlorhexidine; and Group III, 5 mL 2% chlorhexidine. All the irrigating solutions were delivered for one minute through a 3 mL Luer-Loc syringe coupled to an open-end 30-gauge needle tip. In each group, two other specimens (n=6) not contaminated with E. faecalis received the same treatment and served as negative controls.

After preparation, the root canals were dried with sterile paper points (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and filled with BHI broth. A #15 K-file (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) was placed in the canal to working length and the canal was circumferentially filed for 10 s. Three consecutive sterile paper points were introduced into the canal to absorb the BHI broth. The paper points were transferred to an Eppendorf tube containing 5 mL of BHI broth. After collection of the first bacterial sample, the canal was refilled with the same broth and samples were collected daily for 50 days. All collected samples were incubated 24 h at 37 °C. Turbidity was recorded for each specimen as an indicator of bacterial growth. Once turbidity was present, bacteria were identified to ensure that there was no contamination other than E. faecalis.

The proportion of ungrown specimens over 50 days was evaluated using nonparametric Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Differences among groups were tested using the log-rank test and the level of statistical significance was set at P<0.05. All statistical analyses were performed by means of SPSS 17.0 software (SPSS, Chicago IL, USA).

Results

Table 1 shows the number of regrown samples and the median and mean±standard deviation of the day of regrowth. At 50 days, E. faecalis growth was detected in 69.23% specimens in Groups I and II, and in 34.61% specimens in the 2% chlorhexidine group. The results of Kaplan–Meier survival analysis are shown in Figure 1. The highest survival value was with 2% chlorhexidine. Pair comparisons determined by the log-rank test showed statistically significant differences between 2% chlorhexidine and the other groups. There were no significant differences between groups 0.2% cetrimide and 0.2% chlorhexidine.

Table 1. Number and percentage of regrown specimens.

Irrigating solution Number (percentage) of regrown samples Minimum Maximum Median Mean±standard deviation
Group I: 0.2% cetrimidea 18 (69.23%) 4 >50 27 29.92±14.73
Group II: 0.2% chlorhexidinea 18 (69.23%) 4 >50 28 31.80±13.66
Group III: 2% chlorhexidineb 9 (34.61%) 14 >50 >50 40.96±15.31
Open in a new tab

The same superscript letter shows differences that were not statistically significant, determined by the log-rank test (P<0.05).

n=26, per group.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Kaplan–Meier survival probabilities at 50 days (probability of no regrowth) for all groups. Censored represents the proportion of the samples showing no regrowth at the end of the time period. Cum survival is the percentage of samples that did not show E. faecalis regrowth at a given time.

Discussion

Failure of root canal treatment may occur from viable residual bacteria present within the root canal systems.16,17 The high prevalence of E. faecalis in teeth with post-treatment disease is due to its ability to compete with other microorganisms, invade dentinal tubules, resist nutritional deprivation and grow as a biofilm on root canal walls.18

The aim of this study was to compare over time the residual activity of 0.2% cetrimide, 0.2% chlorhexidine and 2% chlorhexidine in root canals infected with E. faecalis. The strain used was E. faecalis ATCC 29212, a strain of reference widely used in antimicrobial susceptibility studies7,11,13,14,15 allowing the comparison of results. The application time was 1 min, as recommended to kill E. faecalis11,19 and achieve residual antibacterial activity with these agents.10 A 17% EDTA solution was used to remove the smear layer, to prevent the formation of a precipitate associated with chlorhexidine and NaOCl interaction20,21 and to promote substantivity over time of chlorhexidine in the presence of collagen.15,22

The antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine depends on the number of molecules available to interact with the dentin.8 Accordingly, a more concentrated chlorhexidine preparation should result in increased resistance to microbial regrowth. Residual effects of 2% chlorhexidine and 0.12% chlorhexidine have been reported in root canal irrigation evaluated ex vivo23 and in vivo24 in short time periods. In the present study, all solutions tested showed residual effects in some specimens for over 50 days when used as final irrigating solutions in infected root canals (Figure 1). As expected, the residual activity was directly related to the concentration of the chlorhexidine solution. The higher concentration tested (2%) showed a greater capacity to inhibit E. faecalis regrowth: at 50 days, only 9/26 specimens showed regrowth. There were significant differences with respect to 0.2% chlorhexidine as well as 0.2% cetrimide (both 18/26) (Table 1). It is noteworthy that regrowth in the 2% chlorhexidine group did not occur in any specimen until day 14—similar to results obtained with a combined solution of 2% chlorhexidine+0.2% cetrimide using the same methodology.14

Nearly identical results were obtained in Groups I and II: in both, the first regrowth occurred on the fourth day and at 50 days, regrowth was seen in 18 samples (Table 1).

Although 0.2% cetrimide showed a high residual activity (median: 27 days), a result closer to the one obtained with 2% chlorhexidine had been anticipated, given its greater ability to kill E. faecalis11 and comparable substantivity determined in a volumetric-dentin unit.15 This type of sample provides for optimal controlled conditions on the entire surface, allowing mechanical trapping of the solution inside the open dentinal tubules and binding to the exposed collagen matrix. The present study involved the use of roots where the low surface tension of cetrimide facilitated its diffusion in the main root canal, but the penetration of the solutions into dentinal tubules may be compromised.25,26 However, it has been shown that the addition of cetrimide in the disinfecting solutions increased their antibacterial effects against E. faecalis in the dentinal tubules.27 In this sense, the results obtained in this study suggest that the antibacterial residual effect of cetrimide would depend on its concentration and the length of its application time,11 or its association with antiseptic agents.14,27,28

Recently, 1% of alexidine, a bisbiguanide disinfectant, has shown similar antibacterial effect to 2% chlorhexidine against E. faecalis in bovine dentin.29 Further studies are needed to determine the best solution and/or combination of solutions, in the irrigation regime or as supplementary approach,29,30 to not only disinfect but also maintain a significant residual antimicrobial activity over time. In conclusion, under the limitations of the present study, final irrigation with 0.2% cetrimide and 0.2% chlorhexidine showed lower residual activity than 2% chlorhexidine in root canals infected with E. faecalis.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Francisca Castillo Pérez for her technical assistance. This study was supported by the Research Group CTS-167 of the Junta de Andalucía, Spain.

References

  1. Siqueira JF, Jr, Lima KC, Magalhães FA, et al. Mechanical reduction of the bacterial population in the root canal by three instrumentation techniques. J Endod. 1999;25 5:332–335. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81166-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bystrom A, Sundqvist G. The antibacterial action of sodium hypochlorite and EDTA in 60 cases of endodontic therapy. Int Endod J. 1985;18 1:35–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1985.tb00416.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN, Santos SR, et al. Efficacy of instrumentation techniques and irrigation regimens in reducing the bacterial population within root canals. J Endod. 2002;28 3:181–184. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200203000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Weber CD, McClanahan SB, Miller GA, et al. The effect of passive ultrasonic activation of 2% chlorhexidine or 5.25% sodium hypochlorite irrigant on residual antimicrobial activity in root canals. J Endod. 2003;29 9:562–564. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200309000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pérez-Heredia M, Ferrer-Luque CM, González-Rodríguez MP. The effectiveness of different acid irrigating solutions in root canal cleaning after hand and rotary instrumentation. J Endod. 2006;32 10:993–997. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ballal NV, Kandian S, Mala K, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod. 2009;35 11:1573–1576. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ferrer-Luque CM, Conde-Ortiz A, Arias-Moliz MT, et al. Residual activity of chelating agents and their combinations with cetrimide on root canals infected with Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod. 2012;38 6:826–828. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mohammadi Z, Abbott PV. The properties and applications of chlorhexidine in endodontics. Int Endod J. 2009;42 4:288–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01540.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mohammadi Z, Abbott PV. Antimicrobial substantivity of root canal irrigants and medicaments: a review. Aust Endod J. 2009;35 3:131–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2009.00164.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kishen A, Sum CP, Mathew S, et al. Influence of irrigation regimens on the adherence of Enterococcus faecalis to root canal dentin. J Endod. 2008;34 7:850–854. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Arias-Moliz MT, Ferrer-Luque CM, González-Rodríguez MP, et al. Eradication of Enterococcus faecalis biofilms by cetrimide and chlorhexidine. J Endod. 2010;36 1:87–90. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Simoes M, Pereira MO, Vieira MJ. Effect of mechanical stress on biofilms challenged by different chemicals. Water Res. 2005;39 20:5142–5152. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Baca P, Junco P, Arias-Moliz MT, et al. Residual and antimicrobial activity of final irrigation protocols on Enterococcus faecalis biofilm in dentin. J Endod. 2011;37 3:363–366. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Baca P, Mendoza-Llamas ML, Arias-Moliz MT, et al. Residual effectiveness of final irrigation regimens on Enteroccus faecalis-infected root canals. J Endod. 2011;37 8:1121–1123. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Baca P, Junco P, Arias-Moliz MT, et al. Antimicrobial substantivity over time of chlorhexidine and cetrimide. J Endod. 2012;38 7:927–930. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Safavi KE, Spangberg LS, Langeland K. Root canal dentinal tubule disinfection. J Endod. 1990;16 5:207–210. doi: 10.1016/s0099-2399(06)81670-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Buck RA, Eleazer PD, Staat RH, et al. Effectiveness of three endodontic irrigants at various tubular depths in human dentin. J Endod. 2001;27 3:206–208. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200103000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Distel JW, Hatton JF, Gillespie MJ. Biofilm formation in medicated root canals. J Endod. 2002;28 10:689–693. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200210000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Ferraz CC, et al. In vitro antimicrobial activity of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis. Int Endod J. 2001;34 6:424–428. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00410.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Marchesan MA, Pasternak Júnior B, Afonso MM, et al. Chemical analysis of the flocculate formed by the association of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103 5:e103–e105. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rossi-Fedele G, Doğramaci EJ, Guastalli AR, et al. Antagonistic interactions between sodium hypochlorite, chlorhexidine, EDTA, and citric acid. J Endod. 2012;38 4:426–431. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim J, Uchiyama T, Carrilho M, et al. Chlorhexidine binding to mineralized versus demineralized dentin powder. Dent Mater. 2010;26 8:771–778. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. White RR, Hays GL, Janer LR. Residual antimicrobial activity after canal irrigation with chlorhexidine. J Endod. 1997;23 4:229–231. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80052-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Leonardo MR, Tanomaru Filho M, Silva LA, et al. In vivo antimicrobial activity of 2% chlorhexidine used as a root canal irrigating solution. J Endod. 1999;25 3:167–171. doi: 10.1016/s0099-2399(99)80135-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Attal JP, Asmussen E, Degrange M. Effects of surface treatment on the free surface energy of dentin. Dent Mater. 1994;10 4:259–264. doi: 10.1016/0109-5641(94)90071-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Portenier I, Haapasalo H, Orstavik D, et al. Inactivation of the antibacterial activity of iodine potassium iodide and chlorhexidine digluconate against Enterococcus faecalis by dentin, dentin matrix, type-I collagen, and heat-killed microbial whole cells. J Endod. 2002;28 9:634–637. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200209000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang Z, Shen Y, Ma J, et al. The effect of detergents on the antibacterial activity of disinfecting solutions in dentin. J Endod. 2012;38 7:948–953. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Portenier I, Waltimo TØ, rstavik D, et al. Killing of Enterococcus faecalis by MTAD and chlorhexidine digluconate with or without cetrimide in the presence or absence of dentine powder or BSA. J Endod. 2006;32 2:138–141. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kim HS, Woo Chang S, Baek SH, et al. Antimicrobial effect of alexidine and chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis infection. Int J Oral Sci. 2013;5 1:26–31. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2013.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Alves FR, Almeida BM, Neves MA, et al. Disinfecting oval-shaped root canals: effectiveness of different supplementary approaches. J Endod. 2011;37 4:496–501. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Oral Science are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES