Skip to main content
DNA and Cell Biology logoLink to DNA and Cell Biology
. 2014 Apr 1;33(4):251–258. doi: 10.1089/dna.2013.2303

Association of Polymorphisms of the Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products Gene with COPD in the Chinese Population

You Li 1,, Cheng Yang 2,,*, Guoda Ma 1, Xuefeng Gu 1, Min Chen 3, Yanyan Chen 1, Bin Zhao 1, Lili Cui 1,, Keshen Li 1,
PMCID: PMC3967375  PMID: 24520905

Abstract

The receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) is a cell surface molecule of the immunoglobulin superfamily that binds diverse endogenous ligands involved in the development of chronic diseases and inflammatory damage. A growing body of evidence has suggested that RAGE is involved in the development and progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The present study investigated the existence of an association among three polymorphisms (−374T/A, −429T/C, and G82S) of the RAGE gene with the risk of COPD in the Chinese population. The RAGE genotypes were determined by polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism in 216 patients with COPD and 239 age-matched healthy individuals. Our study demonstrated that the frequencies of the GS genotype and the S allele in the G82S mutation were significantly higher in COPD patients than in controls (odds ratios [OR]=1.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15–2.50, p=0.0098 and OR=1.42, 95% CI: 1.06–1.91, p=0.023, respectively). Further stratification analysis by smoking status revealed that the presence of the GS genotype conferred a higher risk of developing COPD in current smokers (p=0.044). In contrast, mutations at −374T/A and −429T/C did not demonstrate any association with COPD, even after taking into account the patients' smoking history. Our study provides preliminary evidence that the G82S polymorphism in the RAGE gene is associated with an increased risk of COPD and that the GS genotype of the G82S variant is a risk factor for COPD in the Chinese population.

Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the fourth leading cause of death worldwide, and estimates by the World Bank/World Health Organization project that the disease burden of COPD will rank fifth worldwide by the year 2020 (Rabe et al., 2007). Thus, a better understanding of the etiology and pathogenesis of COPD is important for reducing the risk of death from the disease and developing new therapeutic approaches. COPD is thought to be a multifactorial disorder in which genetic susceptibility, environmental factors, and tobacco exposure may all be implicated (Decramer et al., 2012). Recent evidence suggests that inflammatory processes, such as an increase in cytokines, chemokines, and acute-phase reactant proteins in response to environmental stimuli, particularly smoking, may play important roles in the development of COPD (Kardos and Keenan, 2006). Therefore, numerous genes involved in inflammatory processes have been considered to be associated with COPD (Provinciali et al., 2011).

Receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE), a member of the immunoglobulin (Ig) superfamily, was demonstrated to be a multiligand receptor for advanced glycation end products (AGEs), S100/calgranulins, and high-mobility group box-1 proteins (HMGB1) (Chavakis et al., 2004). The binding of ligands to RAGE results in the activation of the proinflammatory transcription factor NF-κB (nuclear factor-KappaB) or macrophages and the subsequent expression of proinflammatory cytokines in tissues, suggesting that these interactions influence the course of the inflammatory response (Hofmann et al., 1999; Haslbeck et al., 2004; Muhammad et al., 2008). In addition, whereas the level of expression of RAGE is low in most healthy tissues, it is significantly elevated in type II alveolar epithelial cells, endothelial cells, and alveolar macrophages of diseased lung specimens (Brett et al., 1993; Morbini et al., 2006), which suggests that RAGE is implicated in lung homeostasis. Recent case–control studies showed striking increases of the levels of RAGE and reductions of the levels of sRAGE (a soluble isoform of RAGE that is thought to provide protection against inflammation) in COPD, which further support the potential role of the RAGE pathway in the clinical pathology of COPD (Ferhani et al., 2010; Ohlmeier et al., 2010; Miniati et al., 2011; Wu et al., 2011; Sukkar et al., 2012).

The gene encoding RAGE is located on chromosome 6p21.3 near the HLA locus (Sugaya et al., 1994). To date, a total of 1517 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been identified in the RAGE gene (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP), most of which are nonsense mutations. The three functional polymorphisms most extensively studied include two SNPs in the promoter region (−429T/C and −374T/A) and one SNP in exon 3 (G82S) of the RAGE gene. The −429T/C and −374T/A polymorphisms were shown to have a marked effect on the transcriptional activity (Hudson et al., 2001), and the G82S polymorphism occurring in the AGE-binding domain has been shown to have an enhanced binding and cytokine/MMP generation following ligation by a prototypic S100/calgranulin (Hofmann et al., 2002). The associations identified between RAGE polymorphisms and diseases have primarily focused on inflammatory complications such as Crohn's disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, and cardiovascular diseases (Peng et al., 2009; Dabritz et al., 2011; Lu et al., 2011; Martens et al., 2012). However, whether these polymorphisms are associated with the development of COPD has not been studied. In light of the potential role of RAGE in the pathogenesis of COPD, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the existence of an association of these three polymorphisms (−374T/A, −429T/C, and G82S) with COPD in a case–control study of the Han Chinese population.

Methods

Study population

This case–control study recruited 216 inpatients from the Department of Pulmonology at the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University who were diagnosed with COPD according to the criteria of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) (Rabe et al., 2007): a measurement of FEV1/FVC <70% of the predicted value and/or FEV1 <80% of the predicted value and without an exacerbation of the disease in the 12 weeks before recruitment. A total of 239 healthy individuals without chronic respiratory symptoms and with FEV1/FVC ≥70 and FEV1 ≥80 (% predicted) were recruited as controls from the same geographical area (Central Harbin); these participants were comparable to the patient cohort with regard to age (within 5 years), sex, and race. Individuals with a history of asthma or other airway diseases and systemic disorders, such as cardiovascular diseases, dementia, or cancers, were excluded from the study. Smoking habits were assessed during the examination by an interview. Current smokers were defined as subjects who reported current, regular use of cigarettes. Past smokers were defined as subjects who had quit smoking since at least 1 year. Never smokers were defined as subjects who reported never using cigarettes. After informed consent was obtained from each participant, a 5 mL peripheral blood sample was drawn from each participant for genetic analysis. The RAGE promoter genotype was determined using a PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP)-based method. The ethnic composition of the patients with COPD and control individuals in the present study was 100% Chinese Han. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Harbin Medical University.

Genotyping and sequencing

Genomic DNA was isolated from the patients' white blood cells using the EZ-10 Spin Column Whole Blood Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (Sangon Biotech®, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer's protocols and stored at −20°C.

Genotyping of the RAGE gene for the presence of −374T/A and −429T/C mutations in the promoter region of this gene were performed by PCR-RFLP amplification using the following primers: 5′-GGG GCA GTT CTC TCC TCA-3′ (forward primer) and 5′-TCG TCT TGT CAC AGG GAA-3′ (reverse primer). Enzymatic digestions to identify −429T/C variants were carried out using AluI (Fermentas, Lithuania) at 37°C for 3 h. The products of enzymatic digestion were fragments of 250 bp for the wild-type allele T or 162 and 88 bp for the mutated variant C (Ng et al., 2012). Enzymatic digestions were performed to identify the −374T/A variants using MfeI (Fermentas, Lithuania) at 37°C for 3 h. The products of enzymatic digestion were fragments of 215 and 35 bp for the wild-type allele T and 250 bp for the polymorphic allele A (Ng et al., 2012). Genotyping of the RAGE intron 3 G82S mutation (−69 bp insertion/deletion) was also performed by PCR-RFLP using the following primers: 5′-GTA AGC GGG GCT CCT GTT GCA-3′ (forward primer) and 5′-GGC CAA GGC TGG GGT TGA AGG-3′ (reverse primer). After enzymatic digestion using MfeI (Fermentas, Lithuania), the following fragments were identified: 276 bp for the 82G wild-type alleles and 64 and 212 bp for the minor allele 82S (Li et al., 2010).

The digestion products were all analyzed by electrophoresis on 3% agarose gel. For quality control, we sequenced 5% DNA samples directly for each SNP, and no inconsistencies were detected. The results were read and interpreted in a blinded manner without knowledge of the grouping design.

Statistical analyses

Quantitative data are expressed as mean±SD. The allele-counting method was used to calculate the allele frequencies and genotype distribution of COPD patients and control individuals. The Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was assessed using a χ2 test. Allele and genotype distributions in groups were evaluated using the Fisher's exact test or the chi-square test. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated separately as an index of the association of the studied genotypes with COPD. Stratified analyses were performed separately for smoking and nonsmoking participants. Stata Version 11.0 software (College Station, TX) was used to perform all statistical analyses at a level of statistical significance defined as p<0.05 and to determine statistical power.

Results

The demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1. The mean age of the patients (140 men and 76 women) was 60.9±8.9 years as compared with 62.1±10.1 years for the control group (142 men and 97 women). No significant differences were observed between the COPD and control groups with regard to age (p=0.181), gender (p=0.247), BMI (p=0.382), or years of education (p=0.054).

Table 1.

Baseline Demographic and Clinical Characteristics

Variable COPD patients Healthy controls p-Value
Number of subjects 216 239  
Age, years 60.9±8.9 62.1±10.1 0.181
Gender (male), n (%) 140 (64.8) 142 (59.4) 0.247
Body mass index, kg/m2 24.9±3.6 24.6±3.7 0.382
Education, years 7.0±2.1 7.4±2.3 0.054
Smoking status, [n (%)]
 Current smokers 77 (35.6) 64 (26.8) 0.037a
 Past smokers 40 (18.6) 37 (15.5)  
 Never smokers 99 (45.8) 138 (57.7)  
Lung function
 Respiratory rate, breaths/min 23.5±5.1 16.8±3.8 0.000b
 FVC,% predicted 66.8±10.9 96.8±11.2 0.000b
 FEV1,% predicted 43.2±7.8 98.1±10.6 0.000b
 FEV1/FVC,% 50.1±6.5 80.7±9.8 0.000b

Values are mean (SD), except where indicated. Continuous data are expressed as the mean±SD.

The bold value indicates statistical significance.

a

p<0.05.

b

p<0.01.

COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; FVC, forced vital capacity; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s.

Compared with controls, the COPD group included more current smokers (35.6% vs. 26.8%, p=0.037). For those with an established COPD index, the respiratory rate was higher, but the forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), and FEV1/FVC were significantly lower in the COPD group than in the control group (all p=0.000), indicating poor lung function in patients with COPD. No differences were found in other factors examined between the two study groups.

The genotype and allele frequencies of the RAGE (−374T/A, −429T/C, and G82S) polymorphisms in patients with COPD and control individuals are summarized in Table 2. The genotype distributions of these two polymorphisms among the cases and controls were in agreement with the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, and no deviations were observed (p>0.05). A significant difference was found between COPD patients and control subjects in the distribution of the G82S variation (Table 2). The G versus S allele frequencies of the RAGE G82S polymorphism were 69.7% versus 30.3% among the patient cohort and 76.6% versus 23.4% among the control subjects (p=0.023). The prevalence of the RAGE G82S GS genotype and S allele frequencies was significantly higher in patients than in controls (OR=1.70, 95% CI: 1.15–2.50, p=0.0098 and OR=1.42, 95% CI: 1.06–1.91, p=0.023, respectively). No differences in the −374T/A and −429T/C genotype and allele frequencies were observed between COPD cases and control subjects (Table 2). For the −374T/A polymorphism, the prevalence of T and A allele was 85.2% and 14.8% in COPD patients, and 83.9% and 16.1% in controls (p=0.65), respectively. The RAGE −374T/A AA genotype and A allele frequencies did not show any significant difference between COPD patients and controls (OR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.25–2.07, p=0.73 and OR=0.91, 95% CI: 0.63–1.30, p=0.65, respectively). Similarly, for the RAGE −429T/C polymorphism, the prevalence of the T and C allele was 88.7% and 11.3% in COPD patients and 89.3% and 10.7% in controls (p=0.75), respectively. The RAGE −429T/C CC genotype and C allele frequencies did not show any significant difference between COPD patients and controls (OR=1.68, 95% CI: 0.19–2.26, p=0.57 and OR=1.07, 95% CI: 0.69–1.66, p=0.75, respectively).

Table 2.

Genotype and Allele Frequencies of RAGE Polymorphisms Between COPD Patients and Controls, and Corresponding ORs for COPD

Genotype & allele COPD patients (n=216) Healthy controls (n=239) OR (95% CI) p-Value
−374T/A
 TT 158 (73.1) 171 (71.5) 1.00  
 TA 52 (24.1) 59 (24.7) 0.95 (0.62–1.47) 0.92
 AA 6 (2.8) 9 (3.8) 0.72 (0.25–2.07) 0.73
T allele 368 (85.2) 401 (83.9) 1.00  
A allele 64(14.8) 77 (16.1) 0.91 (0.63–1.30) 0.65
−429T/C
 TT 170 (78.7) 190 (79.5) 1.00  
 TC 43 (19.9) 47 (19.7) 1.02 (0.63–1.67) 0.93
 CC 3 (1.4) 2 (0.8) 1.68 (0.19–2.26) 0.57
T allele 383 (88.7) 427 (89.3) 1.00  
C allele 49 (11.3) 51 (10.7) 1.07 (0.69–1.66) 0.75
G82S
 GG 101 (46.8) 142 (59.4) 1.00  
 GS 99 (45.8) 82 (34.3) 1.70 (1.15–2.50) 0.0099b
 SS 16 (7.4) 15 (6.3) 1.50 (0.71–3.17) 0.38
G allele 301 (69.7) 366 (76.6) 1.00  
S allele 131 (30.3) 112 (23.4) 1.42 (1.06–1.91) 0.023a

Data are presented as number (%).

The bold value indicates statistical significance.

a

p<0.05.

b

p<0.01.

OR, odds ratios.

The allele and genotype distributions were compared in current smokers, past smokers, and never smokers (COPD patients and controls) to determine whether the prevalence of different alleles or genotypes was associated with tobacco exposure. The results are presented in Table 3. In current smokers, the prevalence of the RAGE G82S GS genotype was significantly higher in COPD patients than in controls (OR=0.49, 95% CI: 0.24–0.99, p=0.044). By comparison, in past smokers and never smokers, the prevalence of the RAGE G82S genotype was not statistically significant between the COPD patients and the controls (OR=0.63, 95% CI: 0.25–1.61, p=0.33 and OR=0.66, 95% CI: 0.38–1.13, p=0.13, respectively). There was also no statistically significant difference within the G allele or S allele of the RAGE G82S polymorphism in the COPD group compared with the controls (p>0.05). We did not find any significant association of the −374T/A or −429T/C genotypes and alleles with the risk of developing COPD for either current smokers or past smokers or never smokers.

Table 3.

Genotype and Allele Frequencies of RAGE Polymorphisms Between COPD Patients and Controls, and Corresponding ORs for COPD by Smoking Status

  Current smokers Past smokers Never smokers
Gene genotype COPD patients Healthy controls OR (95% CI) p-Value COPD patients Healthy controls OR (95% CI) p-Value COPD patients Healthy controls OR (95% CI) p-Value
−374T/A
 TT 54 (70.1) 46 (71.9) 1.00   29 (72.5) 26 (70.3) 1.00   69 (69.7) 98 (71.0) 1.00  
 TA 20 (26.0) 16 (25.0) 0.94 (0.44–2.02) 0.87 10 (25.0) 10 (27.0) 1.12 (0.40–3.11) 0.83 26 (26.3) 35 (25.4) 0.95(0.52–1.72) 0.86
 AA 3 (3.9) 2 (3.1) 0.78 (0.13–4.89) 0.79 1 (2.5) 1 (2.7) 1.12 (0.07–18.75) 0.94 4 (4.0) 5 (3.6) 0.88 (0.23–3.40) 0.85
T allele 128 (83.1) 108 (84.4) 1.00   68 (85.0) 62 (83.8) 1.00   164 (82.8) 231 (83.7) 1.00  
A allele 26 (16.9) 20 (15.6) 0.91 (0.48–1.72) 0.78 12 (15.0) 12 (16.2) 1.09 (0.46–2.62) 0.84 34 (17.2) 45 (16.3) 0.94 (0.58–1.53) 0.80
−429T/C
 TT 62 (80.5) 52 (81.2) 1.00   32 (80.0) 30 (81.1) 1.00   77 (77.8) 109 (79.0) 1.00  
 TC 14 (18.2) 12 (18.8) 1.02 (0.43–2.40) 0.96 8 (20.0) 7 (18.9) 0.93 (0.30–2.89) 0.90 20 (20.2) 26 (18.8) 0.92 (0.48–1.76) 0.80
 CC 1 (1.3) 0 0.36 0 0 2 (2.0) 3 (2.2) 1.06 (0.17–6.49) 0.95
T allele 138 (89.6) 116 (90.6) 1.00   72 (90.0) 67 (90.5) 1.00   174 (87.9) 244 (88.4) 1.00  
C allele 16 (10.4) 12 (9.4) 0.89 (0.41–1.96) 0.78 8 (10.0) 7 (9.5) 0.94 (0.32–2.73) 0.91 24 (12.1) 32 (11.6) 0.95 (0.54–1.67) 0.86
G82S
 GG 33 (42.8) 38 (59.4) 1.00   18 (45.0) 21 (56.7) 1.00   49 (49.5) 81 (58.7) 1.00  
 GS 39 (50.6) 22 (34.4) 0.49 (0.24–0.99) 0.044a 19 (47.5) 14 (37.8) 0.63 (0.25–1.61) 0.33 45 (45.5) 49 (35.5) 0.66 (0.38–1.13) 0.13
 SS 5 (6.5) 4 (6.2) 0.69 (0.17–2.80) 0.61 3 (7.5) 2 (5.4) 0.57 (0.09–3.81) 0.56 5 (5.0) 8 (5.8) 0.97 (0.30–3.13) 0.96
G allele 105 (68.2) 98 (76.6) 1.00   55 (68.8) 56 (75.7) 1.00   143 (72.2) 211 (76.4) 1.00  
S allele 49 (31.8) 30 (23.4) 0.66 (0.39–1.12) 0.12 25 (31.2) 18 (24.3) 0.71 (0.35–1.44) 0.34 55 (27.8) 65 (23.6) 0.80 (0.53–1.22) 0.30

Data are presented as number (%).

The bold value indicates statistical significance.

a

p<0.05.

Discussion

The results of the present study provide evidence that a genetic variant of the RAGE gene (G82S) is associated with the risk of developing COPD, in contrast with the −374T/A and −429T/C polymorphisms. To the best of our knowledge, these results are the first to suggest an association of the G82S polymorphism of the RAGE gene with COPD in a Chinese population. The frequency of individuals with the GS genotype and S allele was significantly higher in patients with COPD than in controls. Additionally, smokers with the G82S polymorphism of RAGE may run a higher risk of acquiring COPD. Our findings suggest that the G82S polymorphism of RAGE may serve as a genetic marker for predicting the occurrence of COPD in high-risk subjects.

RAGE is a multiligand member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of cell surface molecules expressed constitutively in relatively large amounts in the lung (Cheng et al., 2005). RAGE is a primary cell surface receptor for the S100/calgranulin ligand superfamily and EN-RAGE (extracellular newly identified RAGE-binding protein) (Nawroth et al., 1999). Cellular RAGE can bind with EN-RAGE in the endothelium on mononuclear phagocytes or lymphocytes to trigger cellular activation with the generation of key proinflammatory mediators such as TNF-α and CRP (Hofmann et al., 1999). An analysis of RAGE in bronchial biopsies by immunohistology demonstrated its abundance in the bronchial epithelia of patients with COPD. The conditional upregulation of RAGE expression in the bitransgenic adult mouse lung leads to the manifestation of key features of COPD, including pronounced inflammation and loss of parenchymal tissue (Robinson et al., 2012a). RAGE-deficient mice under hyperoxic conditions survived longer than wild-type controls. These mice also exhibited less cellularity of the airways and diminished alveolar damage compared with wild-type controls (Reynolds et al., 2010). Taken together, this evidence indicates that RAGE plays an important role in the pathogenesis of COPD.

The prevailing mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of COPD include chronic inflammation, imbalances involving proteases/antiproteases, oxidative stress, and elevated apoptosis mediated by RAGE (Robinson et al., 2012a). Inflammation is produced predominantly by neutrophil infiltrates, which are found in abundance in the bronchoalveolar lavage and sputum of COPD patients. Chemoattractants recruiting neutrophils and other potent inflammatory mediators are also found at increased levels in COPD, including IL-1β, CXCL1, CXCL5, and TNF-α, among others. (Robinson et al., 2012a). As a well-known factor for airborne pollutant exposure, smoking can trigger inflammation that leads to an impairment of lung function through its influence on TNF-α expression, which suggests that smoking may interact with RAGE to enhance inflammation (Tanni et al., 2010; Diez Pina et al., 2012). Notwithstanding, only one-fourth of cigarette smokers develop clinically detectable airflow limitation and other symptoms of COPD, suggesting an important role for genetic susceptibility (Stockley et al., 2009).

Two previous large genomewide association (GWA) studies identified that RAGE polymorphism was associated with lung function (Hancock et al., 2010; Repapi et al., 2010). Cheng et al. (2013) investigated 21 SNPs in the AGER locus with sRAGE levels and found that the G82S polymorphism of the RAGE gene was associated with circulating levels of sRAGE levels in COPD patients. Young et al. (2011b) found that the minor allele (T allele or CT/TT genotype) of the G82S polymorphism of RAGE was more commonly found in smokers who did not have COPD compared with those with COPD in a Western population. In our case–control study, we found that the G82S polymorphism of RAGE was associated with the risk of developing COPD. Carriers of the GS genotype and S allele of RAGE showed a significantly greater prevalence of COPD than subjects with the GG or SS genotype. This is the first report demonstrating an association of the G82S polymorphism of RAGE with COPD in a Chinese population. Our results indicated that subjects with the minor S allele of G82S polymorphism of RAGE had an increased risk for COPD compared with those bearing the GG genotype, which is in contrast to Young's report (Young et al., 2011b) that found that the minor S allele played a protective role in COPD. Interestingly, the prevalence of G82S polymorphism of RAGE in our study was different from that previously reported in the white population. In our population, the G82S frequency was 59.4% for the GG genotype and 34.3% for the GS genotype, which were significantly different from the G82S frequencies of GG (85%) and GS (14%) in the white population. This difference may result from profound ethnic differences. In addition, differences in the sample size, patient selection criteria, and research strategy for these studies may help explain this difference. The S allele of this SNP results in glycine being changed to serine at position 82 of the third exon encoding the RAGE protein (a nonsynonymous change altering the polarity of the amino acid at this position) and has been shown to be associated with both reduced serum levels of sRAGE and increased sRAGE signaling compared with the more common G allele (Smith et al., 2011). This change in sRAGE signaling affects downstream gene expression through mitogen-activated protein kinases and NF-κB, both of which have been implicated in the inflammatory responses in COPD (Young et al., 2011a).

The pathogenesis of COPD involves the combined effects of factors such as chronic smoke exposure and the presence or absence of protective or susceptive genetic variants. Cigarette smoking is currently the greatest risk factor for the development of COPD. RAGE and two of its ligands (amphoterin and S100A12) were elevated in pulmonary epithelial cells and macrophage (RAW) cells cultured with cigarette smoke extract (CSE) (Reynolds et al., 2008). Moreover, cigarette smoke exposure significantly upregulated the expression of RAGE and its ligand (S100A6) in both the airways and lungs of rats (Zhang et al., 2008, 2009). The siRNA inhibition of RAGE expression decreased CSE-induced NF-kB activation and cytokine secretion (Reynolds et al., 2011). Further evidence indicated that elevated levels of RAGE in alveolar macrophages was accompanied by an increased expression of active Ras and proinflammatory cytokines, which were reduced in RAGE-deficient alveolar macrophages (Robinson et al., 2012b; Chen et al., 2013). Together, these findings suggest that RAGE may mediate the effects of cigarette smoking or CSE on airway and pulmonary inflammation. In our study, we classified the patients with COPD into smoking and nonsmoking groups. We found that the smoking individuals carrying the GS genotype or S allele of RAGE may run a higher risk of COPD compared with those with the GG or SS genotype. Cigarette smoke is an important exogenous source of reactive glycation products capable of promoting the formation of AGEs, which are irreversibly glycated proteins that efficiently bind RAGE (Cerami et al., 1997). Other studies have shown that serum AGEs and apolipoprotein B-linked AGE levels are significantly elevated in cigarette smokers relative to nonsmokers (Nicholl et al., 1998). It is conceivable that smoking may promote the binding of RAGE with its ligands, thereby exacerbating the progression of COPD.

Our pilot study has certain limitations. First, this study was based upon a cross-sectional design; as a result, we cannot rule out the possibility of recall and selection bias. However, the genotype distribution of controls was in agreement with the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium for all three polymorphisms, and the allele frequencies were in the range of those previously reported (Lindholm et al., 2006; Peng et al., 2009; Lu et al., 2011; Kawai et al., 2012; Ng et al., 2012). Second, information about important COPD risk factors, such as smoking, was gathered from a self-reporting questionnaire, which may introduce information bias. However, these factors are major health issues, and participants' awareness of these conditions was assessed in the questionnaire by asking whether their condition had been diagnosed by physicians. Third, this study included only 216 patients with COPD and may not have sufficient statistical power to assess the associations of RAGE polymorphisms with risk of COPD, particularly for grouped analyses, but we did find significant results for G82S polymorphism of RAGE and the risk of COPD. However, our results should be interpreted with caution. A sample size with sufficient statistical power is critical to the success of genetic association studies to detect causal genes of human complex diseases. The sample size for detecting associations between disease and SNP markers is known to be highly affected by disease prevalence, disease allele frequency, linkage disequilibrium, inheritance models (e.g., additive, dominant, and multiplicative models), and effect size of the genetic variants (e.g., OR, relative risk). Particular attention must be paid to sample sizes when more than one variable is studied simultaneously, such as multiple imperfectly correlated traits, intergenic interactions (epistasis), or gene–environment interactions. Cardon and Bell (2001) indicated that sample sizes involving 1000 to 10,000s of individuals might be required to generate robust data. Pooling case–control studies in complex diseases requires very high accuracy; however, genuine differences in allele frequencies between cases and controls might be quite small. Thus, the comparatively small sample size, together with other environmental risks may mask the genuine differences in allele frequencies between cases and controls. Too small a sample size to detect true evidence for an association increases false-negative rates and reduces the reliability of a study. False-negative rates are increased by multiple factors that cause systematic biases and such biases reduce statistical power. Hong and Park (2012) suggested that a lower sample size for testing more common SNPs with stronger effect sizes and increased LD between marker alleles and disease alleles might contribute to achieve adequate statistical power. In addition, neither the levels of RAGE nor those of sRAGE were evaluated. However, the primary purpose of our study was to establish a genetic reference for future studies. Thus, this investigation focused on assessing the association of different gene polymorphisms of RAGE on the risk of developing COPD. Larger patient and control cohorts will be needed to confirm the association of the RAGE gene polymorphism with COPD in other populations.

In conclusion, our study is the first to describe the existence of an association of RAGE gene polymorphism with the risk of developing COPD in a Chinese population. Our findings support the notion that the G82S polymorphism of RAGE contributes to the development of COPD. In particular, smokers carrying the GS genotype of RAGE may have a greater risk of developing COPD. Our study may provide clues for use in the evaluation of individual susceptibility to COPD and to explore effective measures for the control and prevention of COPD.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by funding from the National Nature Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 31171219, 81271213, 81070878, 81271214, 81300929, and 81261120404); the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (No S2012010008222); and the Science and Technology Innovation Fund of Guangdong Medical College (No. STIF 201101).

Disclosure Statement

The authors have no actual or potential conflicts of interest related to this article. Appropriate approval and procedures were used concerning human study subjects.

References

  1. Brett J., Schmidt A.M., Yan S.D., Zou Y.S., Weidman E., Pinsky D., et al. (1993). Survey of the distribution of a newly characterized receptor for advanced glycation end products in tissues. Am J Pathol 143,1699–1712 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cardon L.R., and Bell J.I. (2001). Association study designs for complex diseases. Nat Rev Genet 2,91–99 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cerami C., Founds H., Nicholl I., Mitsuhashi T., Giordano D., Vanpatten S., et al. (1997). Tobacco smoke is a source of toxic reactive glycation products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94,13915–13920 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chavakis T., Bierhaus A., and Nawroth P.P. (2004). RAGE (receptor for advanced glycation end products): a central player in the inflammatory response. Microbes Infect 6,1219–1225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen L., Liu L., Wang T., Shen Y.C., and Wen F.Q. (2013). Receptor for advanced glycation end products: a new theraputic target for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? Arch Med Res 44,75–76 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cheng C., Tsuneyama K., Kominami R., Shinohara H., Sakurai S., Yonekura H., et al. (2005). Expression profiling of endogenous secretory receptor for advanced glycation end products in human organs. Mod Pathol 18,1385–1396 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cheng D.T., Kim D.K., Cockayne D.A., Belousov A., Bitter H., Cho M.H., et al. (2013). Systemic soluble receptor for advanced glycation endproducts is a biomarker of emphysema and associated with AGER genetic variants in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 188,948–957 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dabritz J., Friedrichs F., Weinhage T., Hampe J., Kucharzik T., Lugering A., et al. (2011). The functional −374T/A polymorphism of the receptor for advanced glycation end products may modulate Crohn's disease. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 300,G823–G832 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Decramer M., Janssens W., and Miravitlles M. (2012). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lancet 379,1341–1351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Diez Pina J.M., Fernandez Acenero M.J., Llorente Alonso M.J., Diaz Lobato S., Mayoralas Alises S., Perez Rodriguez E., et al (2012). [Tumor necrosis factor as an early marker of inflammation in healthy smokers]. Med Clin (Barc) 139,47–53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ferhani N., Letuve S., Kozhich A., Thibaudeau O., Grandsaigne M., Maret M., et al. (2010). Expression of high-mobility group box 1 and of receptor for advanced glycation end products in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 181,917–927 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hancock D.B., Eijgelsheim M., Wilk J.B., Gharib S.A., Loehr L.R., Marciante K.D., et al. (2010). Meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies identify multiple loci associated with pulmonary function. Nat Genet 42,45–52 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Haslbeck K.M., Bierhaus A., Erwin S., Kirchner A., Nawroth P., Schlotzer U., et al. (2004). Receptor for advanced glycation endproduct (RAGE)-mediated nuclear factor-kappaB activation in vasculitic neuropathy. Muscle Nerve 29,853–860 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hofmann M.A., Drury S., Fu C., Qu W., Taguchi A., Lu Y., et al. (1999). RAGE mediates a novel proinflammatory axis: a central cell surface receptor for S100/calgranulin polypeptides. Cell 97,889–901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hofmann M.A., Drury S., Hudson B.I., Gleason M.R., Qu W., Lu Y., et al. (2002). RAGE and arthritis: the G82S polymorphism amplifies the inflammatory response. Genes Immun 3,123–135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hong E.P., and Park J.W. (2012). Sample size and statistical power calculation in genetic association studies. Genomics Inform 10,117–122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hudson B.I., Stickland M.H., Futers T.S., and Grant P.J. (2001). Effects of novel polymorphisms in the RAGE gene on transcriptional regulation and their association with diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes 50,1505–1511 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kardos P., and Keenan J. (2006). Tackling COPD: a multicomponent disease driven by inflammation. Med Gen Med 8,54. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kawai T., Kamide K., Ito N., Onishi M., Oguro R., Takeya Y., et al. (2012). −374 T/A Polymorphism in RAGE gene is associated with onset of diabetes mellitus, atherosclerosis, and renal dysfunction in patients with hypertension. Clin Exp Hypertens 35,236–241 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Li K., Dai D., Zhao B., Yao L., Yao S., Wang B., et al. (2010). Association between the RAGE G82S polymorphism and Alzheimer's disease. J Neural Transm 117,97–104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lindholm E., Bakhtadze E., Sjogren M., Cilio C.M., Agardh E., Groop L., et al. (2006). The −374 T/A polymorphism in the gene encoding RAGE is associated with diabetic nephropathy and retinopathy in type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetologia 49,2745–2755 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lu W., Feng B., Xie G., and Liu F. (2011). Association of AGER gene G82S polymorphism with the severity of coronary artery disease in Chinese Han population. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf ) 75,470–474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Martens H.A., Nienhuis H.L., Gross S., van der Steege G., Brouwer E., Berden J.H., et al. (2012). Receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) polymorphisms are associated with systemic lupus erythematosus and disease severity in lupus nephritis. Lupus 21,959–968 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Miniati M., Monti S., Basta G., Cocci F., Fornai E., and Bottai M. (2011). Soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products in COPD: relationship with emphysema and chronic cor pulmonale: a case-control study. Respir Res 12,37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Morbini P., Villa C., Campo I., Zorzetto M., Inghilleri S., and Luisetti M. (2006). The receptor for advanced glycation end products and its ligands: a new inflammatory pathway in lung disease? Mod Pathol 19,1437–1445 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Muhammad S., Barakat W., Stoyanov S., Murikinati S., Yang H., Tracey K.J., et al. (2008). The HMGB1 receptor RAGE mediates ischemic brain damage. J Neurosci 28,12023–12031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nawroth P.P., Bierhaus A., Vogel G.E., Hofmann M.A., Zumbach M., Wahl P., et al. (1999). [Non-enzymatic glycation and oxidative stress in chronic illnesses and diabetes mellitus]. Med Klin (Munich) 94,29–38 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ng Z.X., Kuppusamy U.R., Tajunisah I., Fong K.C., and Chua K.H. (2012). Association analysis of −429T/C and −374T/A polymorphisms of receptor of advanced glycation end products (RAGE) gene in Malaysian with type 2 diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 95,372–377 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nicholl I.D., Stitt A.W., Moore J.E., Ritchie A.J., Archer D.B., and Bucala R. (1998). Increased levels of advanced glycation endproducts in the lenses and blood vessels of cigarette smokers. Mol Med 4,594–601 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ohlmeier S., Mazur W., Salmenkivi K., Myllarniemi M., Bergmann U., and Kinnula V.L. (2010). Proteomic studies on receptor for advanced glycation end product variants in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proteomics Clin Appl 4,97–105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Peng W.H., Lu L., Wang L.J., Yan X.X., Chen Q.J., Zhang Q., et al. (2009). RAGE gene polymorphisms are associated with circulating levels of endogenous secretory RAGE but not with coronary artery disease in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arch Med Res 40,393–398 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Provinciali M., Cardelli M., and Marchegiani F. (2011). Inflammation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and aging. Curr Opin Pulm Med 17Suppl 1,S3–S10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rabe K.F., Hurd S., Anzueto A., Barnes P.J., Buist S.A., Calverley P., et al. (2007). Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 176,532–555 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Repapi E., Sayers I., Wain L.V., Burton P.R., Johnson T., Obeidat M., et al. (2010). Genome-wide association study identifies five loci associated with lung function. Nat Genet 42,36–44 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Reynolds P.R., Kasteler S.D., Cosio M.G., Sturrock A., Huecksteadt T., and Hoidal J.R. (2008). RAGE: developmental expression and positive feedback regulation by Egr-1 during cigarette smoke exposure in pulmonary epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 294,L1094–L1101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Reynolds P.R., Kasteler S.D., Schmitt R.E., and Hoidal J.R. (2011). Receptor for advanced glycation end-products signals through Ras during tobacco smoke-induced pulmonary inflammation. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 45,411–418 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Reynolds P.R., Schmitt R.E., Kasteler S.D., Sturrock A., Sanders K., Bierhaus A., et al. (2010). Receptors for advanced glycation end-products targeting protect against hyperoxia-induced lung injury in mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 42,545–551 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Robinson A.B., Johnson K.D., Bennion B.G., and Reynolds P.R. (2012b). RAGE signaling by alveolar macrophages influences tobacco smoke-induced inflammation. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 302,L1192–L1199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Robinson A.B., Stogsdill J.A., Lewis J.B., Wood T.T., and Reynolds P.R. (2012a). RAGE and tobacco smoke: insights into modeling chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Front Physiol 3,301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Smith D.J., Yerkovich S.T., Towers M.A., Carroll M.L., Thomas R., and Upham J.W. (2011). Reduced soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products in COPD. Eur Respir J 37,516–522 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Stockley R.A., Mannino D., and Barnes P.J. (2009). Burden and pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc 6,524–526 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sugaya K., Fukagawa T., Matsumoto K., Mita K., Takahashi E., Ando A., et al. (1994). Three genes in the human MHC class III region near the junction with the class II: gene for receptor of advanced glycosylation end products, PBX2 homeobox gene and a notch homolog, human counterpart of mouse mammary tumor gene int-3. Genomics 23,408–419 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Sukkar M.B., Wood L.G., Tooze M., Simpson J.L., McDonald V.M., Gibson P.G., et al. (2012). Soluble RAGE is deficient in neutrophilic asthma and COPD. Eur Respir J 39,721–729 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Tanni S.E., Pelegrino N.R., Angeleli A.Y., Correa C., and Godoy I. (2010). Smoking status and tumor necrosis factor-alpha mediated systemic inflammation in COPD patients. J Inflamm (Lond) 7,29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wu L., Ma L., Nicholson L.F., and Black P.N. (2011). Advanced glycation end products and its receptor (RAGE) are increased in patients with COPD. Respir Med 105,329–336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Young R.P., Hay B.A., and Hopkins R.J. (2011a). Does RAGE protect smokers from COPD? Eur Respir J 38,743–744; author reply 4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Young R.P., Hopkins R.J., Whittington C.F., Hay B.A., Epton M.J., and Gamble G.D. (2011b). Individual and cumulative effects of GWAS susceptibility loci in lung cancer: associations after sub-phenotyping for COPD. PLoS One 6,e16476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhang S.P., Wu Y.W., Wu Z.Z., Liu H.Y., Nie J.H., and Tong J. (2009). Up-regulation of RAGE and S100A6 in rats exposed to cigarette smoke. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 28,259–264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhang S., Xu N., Nie J., Dong L., Li J., and Tong J. (2008). Proteomic alteration in lung tissue of rats exposed to cigarette smoke. Toxicol Lett 178,191–196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from DNA and Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

RESOURCES