Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 28.
Published in final edited form as: Medicina (Kaunas). 2012;48(8):404–409.

Does Matrix Metalloproteinase-3 Polymorphism Play a Role in age-Related Macular Degeneration in Patients With Myocardial Infarction?

Rasa Liutkevičienė 1, Diana Žaliaduonytė-Pekšienė 2, Dalia Žaliūnienė 1, Olivija Gustienė 2, Vytautas Jašinskas 1, Vaiva Lesauskaitė 3, Abdonas Tamošiūnas 3, Remigijus Žaliūnas 2
PMCID: PMC3968398  EMSID: EMS57414  PMID: 23128460

Summary

Objective

The aim of our study was to determine if the genotype of the matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) gene might carry the risk of age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) in patients with myocardial infarction.

Material and Methods

A total of 499 patients with an acute myocardial infarction or with a history of myocardial infarction were enrolled into the study. They were subdivided into 2 groups: 273 patients with ARMD and 226 patients without ARMD. The control group comprised 560 persons from a random sample of the Lithuanian population. DNA was analyzed using real-time polymerase chain reaction to genotype polymorphism 5A/6A at a position −1171 of the MMP-3 gene promoter.

Results

Of the 499 patients with myocardial infarction, 47% had early-stage ARMD. The patients with ARMD were older than the patients in the group without ARMD (62.1±10.8 vs. 59.6±11.1, P<0.01). The analysis of MMP-3 gene polymorphism did not reveal any differences in the distribution of 5A/5A, 5A/6A, and 6A/6A genotypes between the ARMD group, non-ARMD group, and the control group (24.2%, 52.5%, and 23.3% in the ARMD group; 28.7%, 51.9%, and 19.4% in non-ARMD group; and 25.7%, 49.3% and 25.0%, in the control group, respectively).

Conclusions

MMP-3 gene polymorphism had no predominant effect on the development of ARMD in patients with myocardial infarction.

Keywords: age-related macular degeneration, myocardial infarction, neovascularization, matrix metalloproteinase-3 gene polymorphism

Introduction

Age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) is a leading cause of irreversible blindness in elderly people. ARMD is the most common cause of visual loss in persons aged more than 60 years in the developed countries (1). Population estimates have placed the prevalence of ARMD approximately at the level of 7% to 10% among adults aged 40-90 years (2, 3). Despite the magnitude of this problem, the etiopathogenesis of ARMD remains poorly understood. ARMD is a disease of multifactorial etiology. Its development is determined by genetic, inherited, and environmental risk factors. Older age, female gender, oxidative stress, long-term exposure to sunlight, low levels of nutritional antioxidants, nutrition habits, and traditional risk factors for ischemic heart disease (IHD) (cigarette smoking, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obesity, hypercholesterolemia, and alcohol abuse) have been implicated as possible etiological factors for the development of ARMD (4-8).

In general, the most important pathogenetic mechanisms causing the development of ARMD are the formation of drusen, local inflammation, and neovascularization (9). Recent studies have demonstrated that angiogenesis is also associated with an important extracellular remodeling involving different proteolytic systems among which matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) play an essential role (10, 11). MMP-3 (also known as stromelysin-1) is a key member of the MMP family that plays a pivotal role in the physiological and pathological events associated with connective tissue metabolism and remodeling (12, 13). Consequently, MMP-3 gene polymorphism could have an influence on retinal vascular remodeling and stiffening and plays a role in the development of ARMD. Literature data concerning the impact of MMP-3 on ARMD are scarce and inconsistent. Some results have suggested a possible MMP-3 effect on ARMD pathogenesis (14) and are in conflict with the data from the other study assuming that MMP-3 expression does not play a role in the development of ARMD (15). To date, there are no studies analyzing the impact of MMP-3 gene polymorphism on ARMD.

Assuming the fact that MMP-3 could have an influence on retinal vascular remodeling, we hypothesized that the MMP-3 gene may carry risk in the development of ARMD. To test our hypothesis, the 5A/6A MMP-3 polymorphism in ARMD and non-ARMD patients with myocardial infarction (MI) and a random sample of the Lithuanian population without evidences of IHD and ARMD was evaluated.

Material and Methods

Study Population

A total of 499 patients with an acute MI or with a documented history of MI admitted to the Clinic of Cardiology, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, were randomly enrolled into the study. All the patients had a diagnosis of an acute MI made on the basis of prolonged chest pain, elevated troponin I serum level, ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities on ECG, and typical wall motion abnormalities on the baseline 2-D echocardiogram or previous MI diagnosed based on clinical data of the patient and official medical records. All the patients underwent routine blood testing. The patients completed a standardized questionnaire on IHD risk factors and underwent an ophthalmological examination. Based on the results of the ophthalmological examination, the patients were subdivided into 2 groups: 273 patients with ARMD and 226 without ARMD.

The control group (n=560) consisted of a random sample of Kaunas population without the symptoms of IHD, stroke, and ARMD, taken from the epidemiological Health, Alcohol, and Psychosocial Factors in Eastern Europe study.

The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee (No. BE-2-14).

Ophthalmological Examination

Visual acuity (VA) was estimated using letter charts and was expressed as decimal notations. All the patients were evaluated by slit lamp biomicroscopy. Biomicroscopy was performed in order to assess the corneal and lenticular transparency.

During each examination, the intraocular pressure was measured. Pupils of the subjects were dilated with 1% tropicamide. After the dilation of the pupils, funduscopy was performed with an ophthalmoscope of the direct monocular type and a slit lamp, using a double aspheric lens of +78 diopters. The results of the examination were recorded on standardized forms, which were developed for this study.

Color fundus photographs were taken with a semiwide angle fundus camera (OPTON SBG, 30 degrees). The photographs were taken focusing to the center of the fovea.

The following exclusion criteria were used: 1) unrelated eye disorders, e.g., high refractive error, cloudy cornea, lens opacity (nuclear, cortical, or posterior subcapsular cataract), keratitis, acute or chronic uveitis, glaucoma, or diseases of the optic nerve; 2) systemic illnesses, e.g., diabetes mellitus, malignant tumors, systemic connective tissue disorders, chronic infectious diseases, or conditions following organ or tissue transplantation; and 3) ungraded color fundus photographs resulting from obscuration of the ocular optic system or because of fundus photograph quality.

The classification of ARMD presented in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study was used (16) according to which early ARMD is defined as a combination of multiple small and few intermediate drusen (63 to 124 μm in diameter) or retinal pigment epithelial abnormalities. Intermediate ARMD is characterized by the presence of extensive intermediate drusen and/or at least one large (giant) druse (≥125 μm in diameter) or geographic atrophy (GA) not involving the center of the fovea, whereas advanced ARMD by GA involving the fovea and/or or any of the features of neovascular ARMD (16). The diagnosis of early ARMD was made if it was confirmed by 2 experienced ophthalmologists and if no other eye disorders were documented during a detailed ophthalmological examination.

DNA Extraction and Genotyping

DNA extraction and analysis of the gene polymorphism of MMPs were carried out at the Laboratory of Molecular Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LUHS). DNA was extracted from 2 mL of peripheral blood (from white blood cells) using a genomic DNA purification kit (AB Ferment) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations or the silica gel column method utilizing a genomic DNA extraction kit (SorpoClean™ Genomic DNA Extraction Module, SORPO Diagnostics) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.

The genotyping of MMP-3 (−1171 5A/6A) was carried out using the real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. The primers and molecular markers for the genotyping of MMP-3 (−1171 5A/6A) (rs3025058) were produced by the German company Metabion according to the primer sequences determined and furnished by the scientists of the Laboratory of Molecular Cardiology at the Institute of Cardiology of LUHS. To ensure internal control, 20 samples were sequenced at the Sequencing Center of the Institute of Biotechnology, and the obtained results confirmed the reiteration and precision of the data. The genotyping was performed using an HT 7900 real-time PCR quantification system (Applied Biosystems, USA). The real-time PCR reagents (2X Maxima™ Probe/ROX qPCR Master mix buffer, fluorescent dye-labeled markers, sterile ddH2O) were taken out from the environment of −20°C and were thawed at room temperature. The thawed reagents were decentrifuged (10 000 rpm) and stored in an ice tub. An appropriate real-time PCR mix ture of MMP-3 (−1171 5A/6A) was prepared for determining a single-nucleotide polymorphism.

A PCR reaction mixture (9 μL) was poured into each well of a 96-well microtiter plate, and then 1 μL of matrix DNA of the samples (~10 ng) and 1 μL of negative control (−K) were added. An optic film was pasted on the 96-well microtiter plate, and it was centrifuged for 15 seconds at 10 000 rpm.

During the genotyping, the following real-time PCR programs were used: Allelic Discrimination and Absolute quantification. Then, the assay was continued following the manual provided by the manufacturer (www.appliedbiosystem.com, Allelic Discrimination Getting Started Guide). After that, the Allelic Discrimination program was completed, and the geno typing results were received. The program determined the individual geno types according to the fluorescence intensity rate of different detectors. A molecular marker labeled with a fluorescent dye, VIC®, or Yakima Yellow® was chosen for the x-axis, and a molecular marker labeled with a fluores cent dye, FAM, was selected for the y-axis.

Statistical Analysis

Continuous data were expressed as means (SD). Categorical data were summarized as frequencies and percentages. The Hardy-Weinberg analysis was performed to compare the observed and expected frequencies of the MMP genotypes using the χ2 test in all groups. The distribution of the MMP single nucleotide polymorphism in the ARMD and control group was compared by using the Fisher exact test. In order to predict the impact of age or recurrent event on ARMD development in an individual patient, logistic regression analysis was performed.

The statistical significance level was set at a P value of <0.05. The data were analyzed using the standard statistical software SPSS/W 13.0 (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences for Windows, Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA).

Results

Of the 499 patients with MI, 273 (47%) had early-stage ARMD. Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of the study population. In general, patients with ARMD were older than non-ARMD patients (P<0.001) and had a recurrent MI or recurrent symptoms of unstable angina more frequently (P<0.05) (Table 1). Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that older age and recurrent cardiac events increased a chance to develop ARMD (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.004–1.038; P=0.013; and OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.043–2.270; P=0.030, respectively), but after the adjustment for age, no additional impact of recurrent cardiac events on ARMD development was documented (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.320–1.401; P=0.67). Age remained the only independent predictor of ARMD development (OR, 1.02; 95% CI 1.006–1.043; P=0.01).

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics of the Study Population

Characteristic ARMD Group
n = 273
Non-ARMD Group
n = 226
Control Group
n = 560
Age, years 62.1 (10.8) 59.6 (11.1)* 61.22 (7.82)

Men, n (%) 207 (75.8) 184 (81.4) 450 (80.4)

Recurrent myocardial infarction or angina, n (%) 97 (36.9) 57 (26.1)*

One-vessel disease 97 (39.1) 101 (47.2)
Two-vessel disease 80 (32.3) 61 (28.5)
Three-vessel disease 71 (28.6) 52 (24.3)

Educational level, n (%)
 Lower than higher 103 (51.5) 105 (63.3)
 Higher 97 (48.5) 78 (46.7)

History of drug treatment, n (%)
 Calcium channel blocker 19 (7.0) 22 (9.7)
 Statin 18 (6.6) 15 (6.6)
 Beta-blocker 66 (24.2) 49 (21.7)
 ACE 66 (24.2) 47 (20.8)
 Diuretic 10 (3.7) 9 (4.0)
 Antiplatelet (aspirin/clopidogrel) 50 (18.3) 42 (18.6)

Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg 144.1 (21.9) 143.5 (21.1)

Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg 86.9 (11.4) 87.8 (12.1)

Body mass index, kg/m2 28.8 (4.8) 28.1 (4.4) 28.41 (4.9)

White blood cell count, ×109/L 9.24 (3.5) 9.5 (3.0)

Neutrophil count, ×109/L 7.1 (2.8) 8.0 (2.6)

Monocyte count, ×109/L 0.7 (0.4) 0.8 (0.8)

Lymphocyte count, ×109/L 1.8 (0.8) 1.9 (0.9)

Platelet count, ×109/L 234.1 (52.2) 261.5 (92.3)

Values are mean (standard deviation) unless otherwise stated. Ellipses indicate no data available.

ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARMD, age-related macular degeneration.

*

P<0.05 between non-ARMD and ARMD groups;

P<0.05 between patients with ARMD or without ARMD taken together and control group.

Gender, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, body mass index, prior use of any cardiovascular medication, severity of IHD, and white blood cell and platelet counts were not associated with the development of ARMD.

Cardiovascular risk factors of the study population are presented in Table 2. There were no significant differences in the frequency of any cardiovascular risk factor comparing patients with and without ARMD. Comparing both patients’ groups with the control group, a significant difference was observed only in the frequency of arterial hypertension, which was more common in the patients with and without ARMD than in the control group (P<0.001). A history of dyslipidemia and a family history of IHD did not show any differences comparing the groups. Cigarette smoking status, obesity, physical activity, and alcohol consumption showed no associations with ARMD.

Table 2.

Cardiovascular Risk Factors in the Study Population With and Without ARMD and the Control Group

Risk Factor ARMD Group
n = 273
Non-ARMD Group
n = 226
Control Group
n = 560
History of arterial hypertension 228 (83.5) 181 (80.1) 379 (67.9)*

Cigarette smoking
 Never 104 (42.8) 80 (39.9) 282 (50.4)
 Current or withdrawn 139 (57.2) 137 (60.1) 278 (49.6)

Body mass index
 Normal, <25 kg/m2 61 (22.3) 56 (24.8) 132 (23.6)
 Overweight, 25–30 kg/m2 114 (41.8) 99 (43.8) 246 (43.9)
 Obesity, ≥30 kg/m2 98 (35.9) 71 (31.4) 182 (32.5)

History of dyslipidemia 213 (79.5) 160 (75.7) 476 (85.0)

Family history of IHD 59 (35.8) 46 (32.9) 230 (41.7)

Physical activity
 None 98 (61.2) 97 (66.4)
 1–2 times a month 14 (8.8) 9 (6.2)
 1–2 times a week 16 (10.0) 18 (12.3)
 More than 3 times a week 32 (20.0) 22 (15.1)

Alcohol consumption
 None 5 (8.3) 5 (6.5)
 Past 7 (11.7) 2 (2.6)
 Less than 1 time a month 35 (58.3) 43 (55.8)
 1–7 times a week 20 (12.0) 26 (33.8)
 More than 7 times a week 1 (1.7) 1 (1.3)

Values are number (percentage). Ellipses indicate no data available.

IHD, ischemic heart disease; ARMD, age-related macular degeneration

*

P<0.05 between patients with ARMD or without ARMD taken together and control group.

Genotype Distribution

The prevalence of MMP-3 5A/6A genotypes was 27.7% (5A/5A), 52.3% (5A/6A), and 20.0% (6A/6A) in both patients’ groups taken together and 25.7% (5A/5A), 49.3% (5A/6A), and 25.0% (6A/6A) in the control group. The genotype distribution was in the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. There were no significant differences in the genotypic distribution of MMP-3 5A/6A polymorphism and allele (5A, 6A) frequencies comparing the patients with and without ARMD and the control group (Table 3).

Table 3.

Genotypic Distribution of MMP-3 Gene Polymorphism and Allele Frequencies in the Study Population With and Without ARMD Versus the Control Group

Genotype ARMD Group Non-ARMD Group Control Group P
5A/5A 54 (24.2) 77 (28.7) 144 (25.7) NS
5A/6A 117 (52.5) 139 (51.9) 276 (49.3) NS
6A/6A 52 (23.3) 52 (19.4) 140 (25.0) NS

Allele frequency
5A 0.50 0.55 0.50 NS
6A 0.50 0.45 0.50 NS

Values are number (percentage)

5A or 6A allele frequency was calculated as follows: (2×percentage of 5A/5A or 6A/6A genotype frequency+1×percentage of 5A/6A genotype frequency)/200.

ARMD, age-related macular degeneration; NS, not significant.

Discussion

Our study aimed at determining if the MMP-3 gene may carry risk in the development of ARMD. Unfortunately, the results showed no differences in the genotypic distribution of MMP-3 polymorphism comparing the patients with and without ARMD, who were admitted with current or previous myocardial infarction, and the control group. Some previous studies have analyzed the relations between ARMD and some genetic factors; however, most studies analyzed other risk factors for ARMD. For a long time, atherosclerosis has been proposed as a key pathogenic factor for ARMD (17-23). Some investigators have suggested that increased arterial blood pressure, hyperlipidemia, family history of IHD, low physical activity, smoking, and overweight by virtue of their effects on the choroidal circulation and lipid deposition in the Bruch’s membrane may be related to the pathogenesis ARMD (3-7, 20, 24) as well as to the development of atherosclerosis and IHD (25-27). ARMD and IHD share the same risk factors, and a few previous studies have reported an association between ARMD and incidence of MI (17, 21, 25). Therefore, we hypothesized that genetic polymorphism of MMP-3 also may influence the development of ARMD as it has been described in some studies as a risk factor in the development of MI and IHD as well as in the pathogenesis of ARMD.

The pathogenesis of ARMD is a complex of processes. Recent studies have demonstrated that hypoxia is not the only factor inducing neoangiogenesis. Angiogenesis is also associated with the imbalance between positive and negative regulatory molecules controlling angiogenesis, vascular endothelial grow factors (VEGF), and pigment epithelium-derived factors playing an important role in the choroidal neovascular membrane formation (28, 29) and important extracellular remodeling involving different proteolytic systems, among which MMPs play an essential role (30, 31). MMPs are involved in the different steps of angiogenesis. They facilitate endothelial cell (EC) migration by releasing them from their basement membranes, degrading perivascular extracellular matrix (ECM), and generating ECM degradation products that are chemotactic for EC. Additionally, MMPs increase the bioavailability of VEGF and other peptide growth factors through the degradation of ECM proteins, which sequester growth factors.

MMP-3 is a key member of the MMPs family and plays a role in the physiological and pathological events associated with connective tissue metabolism and remodeling (32). Current evidence suggests that MMPs play a role in early atherosclerosis, plaque rupture, and MI. Some studies have shown the associations between the low-activity 6A allele and both coronary and carotid atherosclerosis, and increased intima-media thickness (33-35). This suggests that individuals with the 6A/6A genotype, which leads to the lower production of MMP-3, have an altered matrix turnover favoring the deposition of matrix and accelerated atherosclerosis. Contrary, a number of studies have shown an association between the high-activity 5A allele and acute coronary events suggesting a role in plaque rupture due to increased proteolysis (36). Few studies have been conducted to clarify if the MMP-3 gene may have an influence on retinal vascular remodeling and stiffening and play a role in the development of ARMD. A German study showed that MMP-3 expression in the retinal pigment epithelium was inducible by oxidative stress; thus, oxidative stress can be considered as one of the risk factors for the development of ARMD (14). Swedish researchers conducted a study in which surgically removed subfoveal fibrovascular membranes from eyes were analyzed for the expression of several MMPs (including MMP-3). Their results supported a role for MMPs in the development of choroidal neovascularization in ARMD (15).

However, our results did not show any differences in the distribution of genotypes comparing the patients with and without ARMD and the control group. Age was the only risk factor for ARMD in our study. These findings confirm the importance of the aging process in the vessels in the development of ARMD (6, 17, 18).

The main limitation of our study is that there were no patients with ARMD without IHD, who could be enrolled as a control group. The other limitation is that the prevalence of ARMD was not evaluated in a random sample of the population. We believe we will have a chance to investigate the impact of genetic MMP-3 polymorphism on the development of ARMD in patients with ARMD with IHD and without IHD.

Conclusions

In our studied patients’ population with current or previous myocardial infarction, MMP-3 gene polymorphism had no predominant effect on the development of ARMD in patients with myocardial infarction. Larger-scale and repeated studies should be carried out to check this hypothesis.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Research Council of Lithuania (grant No. MIP-10330), the Wellcome Trust (grant No. 064947/Z/01/Z), the National Institute on Aging (grant No. IR0I AG23522-01), and the MacArthur Foundation (Health and Social Upheaval Network).

Footnotes

statement of Conflict of Interest

The authors state no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Klein R, Peto T, Bird A, Vannewkirk MR. The epidemiology of age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:486–95. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2003.11.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Friedman DS, O’Colmain BJ, Muñoz B, Tomany SC, McCarty C, de Jong PT, et al. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:564–72. doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.4.564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cimbalas A, Paunksnis A, Černiauskienė LR, Domarkienė S. Prevalence and risk factors of age-related macular degeneration. Medicina (Kaunas) 2004;39:37–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fraser-Bell S, Wu J, Klein R, Azen SP, Varma R. Smoking, alcohol intake, estrogen use, and age-related macular degeneration in Latinos: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;14:79–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.08.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Seddon JM, George S, Rosner B. Cigarette smoking, fish consumption, omega-3 fatty acid intake, and associations with age-related macular degeneration: the US Twin Study of Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:995–1001. doi: 10.1001/archopht.124.7.995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Liutkevičienė R, Lesauskaitė V, Ašmonienė V, Žaliūnienė D, Jašinskas V. Factors determining age-related macular degeneration: a current view. Medicina (Kaunas) 2010;46:89–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Clemons TE, Milton RC, Klein R, Seddon JM, Ferris FL., 3rd Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group. Risk factors for the incidence of advanced age-related macular degeneration in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) Ophthalmology. 2005;112:533–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.10.047. AREDS report no. 19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zaliuniene D, Jasinskas V, Jurkevicius R, Gustiene O, Zaliunas R. Endothelial function, intima-media thickness, and ankle-brachial index in patients with cataract and age-related macular degeneration. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2008;18:384–91. doi: 10.1177/112067210801800312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zarbin MA. Current concepts in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:598–614. doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.4.598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ye S. Polymorphism in matrix metalloproteinase gene promoters: implication in regulation of gene expression and susceptibility of various diseases. Matrix Biol. 2000;19:623–9. doi: 10.1016/s0945-053x(00)00102-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tatar O, Adam A, Shinoda K, Eckert T, Scharioth GB, Klein M, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases in human choroidal neovascular membranes excised following verteporfin photodynamic therapy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:1183–9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.114769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lesauskaitė V, Šinkūnaitė G, Benetis R, Grabauskas V, Vaškelytė J, Smalinskienė A, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-3 gene polymorphism and dilatative pathology of ascending thoracic aorta. Medicina (Kaunas) 2008;44:386–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Samnegard A, Silveira P, Lundman S, Boquist S, Odeberg J, Hulthe J, et al. Serum matrix metalloproteinase-3 concentration is influenced by MMP-3 1612 5A/6A promoter genotype and associated with myocardial infarction. J Intern Med. 2005;258:411–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2005.01561.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Alge-Priglinger CS, Kreutzer T, Obholzer K, Wolf A, Mempel M, Kernt M, et al. Oxidative stress-mediated induction of MMP-1 and MMP-3 in human RPE cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:5495–503. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-3193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Steen B, Sejersen S, Berglin L, Seregard S, Kvanta A. Matrix metalloproteinases and metalloproteinase inhibitors in choroidal neovascular membranes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:2194–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chylack LT, Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, Leske MC, Bullimore MA, Bailey IL, et al. The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group The Lens Opacities Classification System III. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:831–6. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1993.01090060119035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Duan Y, Mo J, Klein R, Scott IU, Lin HM, Caulfield J, et al. Age-related macular degeneration is associated with incident myocardial infarction among elderly Americans. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:732–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.07.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Friedman E. The role of the atherosclerotic process in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130:658–63. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(00)00643-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sun C, Klein R, Wong TY. Age-related macular degeneration and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1913–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.03.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tan JS, Mitchell P, Smith W, Wang JJ. Cardiovascular risk factors and the long-term incidence of age-related macular degeneration: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1143–50. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.09.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wong TY, Tikellis G, Sun C, Klein R, Couper DJ, Sharrett AR. Age-related macular degeneration and risk of coronary heart disease: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:86–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tan JS, Wang JJ, Liew G, Rochtchina E, Mitchell P. Age-related macular degeneration and mortality from cardiovascular disease or stroke. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:509–12. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.131706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bao-Anh NK, Earl L, Goehring EL, Jr, Werther W, Gower EW, Do DV, et al. Hospitalized cardiovascular diseases in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:1280–6. doi: 10.1001/archopht.126.9.1280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Curcio CA, Millican CL, Bailey T, Kruth HS. Accumulation of cholesterol with age in human Bruch’s membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:265–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wilson PW, D’Agostino RB, Daniel Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation. 1998;97:1837–47. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.97.18.1837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Morrow DA, Bernard JG, Braunwald E. Chronic coronary artery disease. In: Zipes DP, Libby P, Bonow RO, Braunwald E, editors. Braunwald’s heart disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medicine. Elsevier Inc; Philadelphia, PA: 2007. pp. 1281–342. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Redberg RF, Benjamin EJ, Bittner V, Braun LT, Goff DC, Jr, Havas S, et al. AHA/ACCF [corrected] 2009 performance measures for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on performance measures (writing committee to develop performance measures for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease): developed in collaboration with the American Academy of Family Physicians; American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association: endorsed by the American College of Preventive Medicine, American College of Sports Medicine, and Society for Women’s Health Research. Circulation. 2009;120:1296–336. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Spilsbury K, Garrett KL, Shen WY, Constable IJ, Rakoczy PE. Overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the retinal pigment epithelium leads to the development of choroidal neovascularization. Am J Pathol. 2000;157:135–44. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64525-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ogata N, Wada M, Otsuji T, Jo N, Tombran-Tink J, Matsumura M. Expression of pigment epithelium-derived factor in normal adult rat eye and experimental choroidal neovascularization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:1168–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Guo L, Hussain AA, Limb GA, Marshall J. Age-dependent variation in metalloproteinase activity of isolated human Bruch’s membrane and choroid. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:2676–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kohri T, Moriwaki M, Nakajima M, Tabuchi H, Shiraki K. Reduction of experimental laser induced choroidal neovascularization by orally administered BPHA, a selective metalloproteinase inhibitor. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003;241:943–52. doi: 10.1007/s00417-003-0761-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Woessner JF., Jr. Matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in connective tissue remodeling. FASEB J. 1991;5:2145–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Beyzade S, Zhang S, Wong YK, Day IN, Eriksson P, Ye S. Influences of matrix metalloproteinase-3 gene variation on extent of coronary atherosclerosis and risk of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:2130–7. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00482-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Seifi M, Fallah S, Firoozrai M. Influence of genetic polymorphism in matrix metalloproteinase-3 on extent of coronary atherosclerosis and risk of coronary artery stenosis. Arch Med Res. 2009;40:600–4. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2009.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Djurić T, Zivković M, Radak D, Jekić D, Radak S, Stojković L, et al. Association of MMP-3 5A/6A gene polymorphism with susceptibility to carotid atherosclerosis. Clin Biochem. 2008;41:1326–9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2008.08.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Abilleira S, Bevan S, Markus HS. The role of genetic variants of matrix metalloproteinases in coronary and carotid atherosclerosis. J Med Genet. 2006;43:897–901. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2006.040808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES