Abstract
The formation of an unexpected heterocyclic scaffold, a benzoxazole, in a three-component reaction between a ketone, isocyanide, and 2-aminophenol was encountered. This reaction involved a benzo[b][1,4]oxazine intermediate resulting from intramolecular attack of the aminophenol hydroxyl group on the nitrilium ion. Unlike previous literature examples, the trapped nitrilium benzo[b][1,4]oxazine could readily be subjected to ring opening with bis-nucleophiles. The reaction scope includes simple linear as well as complex cyclic ketones and substituted 2-aminophenols. A representative benzoxazole product could be further diversified to yield drug-like compounds.
Multicomponent reactions (MCRs) involve the simultaneous reaction of more than two starting materials to form a single product.1 The extreme variety of products that can be achieved through the reaction of readily available reagents as well as their one-pot nature and high atom efficiency make MCRs suitable for the synthesis of highly diverse drug-like libraries.2 Isocyanide-based reactions form the backbone of today’s MCR armada, among which the most widely applied examples commonly employ amines, aldehydes or ketones, isocyanides, carboxylic acids, and phenols.3
Heterocycles play a critical role in the design and synthesis of bioactive small molecules: the vast majority of marketed drugs contain at least one heterocyclic ring. Numerous nitrogen-containing heterocycles including dihydrothiazoles, benzoxazoles, benzothiazoles, and benzimidazoles possess biological activity.4 The synthesis of heterocycles is traditionally accomplished through multistep routes and/or harsh reaction conditions, particularly of benzoxazoles,5 and while MCR approaches can also be taken,6 there is a need for a more resource-efficient, preferably one-pot method for their synthesis.7 Metal catalyzed insertions of isocyanides leading to heterocycles are known and usually utilize harsh conditions and have somewhat limited scope in terms of diversity.8
Herein we report a novel MCR between a ketone, 2-aminophenol, and isocyanide that leads to the synthesis of benzoxazoles and other heterocycles (Scheme 1). The postulated reaction route proceeds via a benzo[b][1,4]oxazine (benzoxazine intermediate). The formation of benzoxazine occurs by intramolecular trapping of the reactive nitrilium ion by the adjacent phenolic hydroxyl of 2-aminophenol. While trapping of nitrilium species by heteroatoms is a known process,9 the novelty of our approach is the reactive nature of the trapped intermediate. Owing to its reactivity, the oxazine ring of the trapped nitrilium intermediate can be opened up by a second molecule of aminophenol or other bis-nucleophiles leading to the elimination of an isocyanide-derived amine, finally yielding benzoxazoles or other heterocyclic scaffolds. The reaction generates two additional points of diversity that were utilized to synthesize various bis-heterocyclic scaffolds.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Heterocyclic Scaffolds Using Our Three-Component Reaction.
While performing a Ugi four-component reaction in 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol (TFE) with 1 equiv of 2-aminophenol, 1 equiv of N-methyl-4-piperidone, 1 equiv of 4-methoxyphenyl isocyanide, and 1 equiv of acetic acid at 55 °C, an unusual heterocyclic (benzo[d]oxazol-2-yl)-1-methylpiperidine (benzoxazole) product 1 in 50% yield with only trace amounts of the expected Ugi four-component reaction product was observed.
Because the carboxylic acid substrate was not incorporated into the product, the reaction was carried out without the addition of any carboxylic acid. Benzoxazole 1 was obtained again, suggesting that the product formation proceeded via a three-component MCR between 2-aminophenol, isocyanide, and ketone. The formation of benzoxazole 1 was then optimized (Table 1). By using 3 equiv of 2-aminophenol, the yield of the isolated product increased to 84% (entry 2). Performing the reaction at room temperature afforded lower yields (42%). Similarly, heating the mixture to 80 °C gave no improvement in yield. The role of solvent in product formation was investigated next, and to our surprise the reaction failed in all solvents (including methanol, the solvent of choice for traditional MCRs) except TFE, suggesting the slight acidity of the solvent (pKa = 12.37) played a crucial role in the reaction. Because MCRs have been shown to be catalyzed by acids,10 the reaction was investigated using an array of Lewis and Brønsted acids. Transition metal triflates gave no advantage in yields. However, using 0.1 equiv of trifluoromethanesulphonic acid (HOTf) afforded quantitative yields of benzoxazole 1 (entry 5). The HOTf-catalyzed reaction also afforded a high yield (82%) in methanol (entry 6), a solvent in which benzoxazole formation had previously failed. The acid catalyzed reaction in toluene yielded 24% (entry 7) product suggesting that, besides acid catalysis, a polar solvent is preferred for this reaction to proceed to completion.
Table 1. Yield of Benzoxazole 1 under Different Reaction Conditions.
entry | catalyst (equiv) | solvent | yield [%] |
---|---|---|---|
1 | none | MeOH | 0 |
2 | none | TFE | 84 |
3 | Sc(III)OTf (0.1) | TFE | 58 |
4 | Zn(II)OTf (0.1) | TFE | 62 |
5 | HOTf (0.1) | TFE | 100 |
6 | HOTf (0.1) | MeOH | 82 |
7 | HOTf (0.1) | toluene | 24 |
With the optimized conditions in hand the scope of this reaction was investigated by using different ketones and substituted 2-aminophenols (Scheme 2). The desired benzoxazole products (2–8, 9a–d) were obtained in good yields in most cases. The reaction was effective for a variety of ketones including the complex, multifunctional semisynthetic natural product-like naloxone (7), a clinically used opioid antagonist, highlighting the good functional group tolerance of this reaction. The scope of this heterocycle-forming MCR was investigated using various isocyanides (Table 2).
Scheme 2. Scope of Heterocycle-Forming MCR with Various Ketones and Substituted 2-Aminophenols.
Table 2. Yield of Heterocycle-Forming MCR with Different Isocyanides.
entry | R1 | yield [%] |
---|---|---|
1 | cyclohexyl | 70 |
2 | 4-OMe-Ph | 100 |
3 | 4-F-Ph | 28 |
4 | naphth-2-yl | 59 |
5 | tBu | 90 |
6 | 1-adamantyl | 61 |
7 | 2,6-diMe-Ph | 0 |
While 4-methoxyphenyl isocyanide provided the best yield (entry 2), nearly all other isocyanides were also effective in the reaction, except 2,6-dimethylphenyl isocyanide (entry 7). It should be pointed out that the isocyanide contributes only one carbon atom toward benzoxazole 1; therefore the reaction outcome is independent of the nature of isocyanide used. The aryl or alkyl amine moiety acts as the leaving group, leading to an insertion of only the isocyanide carbon into the benzoxazole moiety.
We were surprised to find that 2,6-dimethylphenyl isocyanide, instead of benzoxazole 1, yielded a spiro[benzo[b][1,4]oxazine]imine (benzoxazine) scaffold 10 in good yield (Table 3). The synthesis, isolation, and structure elucidation of this derivative provided us the first clues about the mechanism of this reaction (Figure 1).
Table 3. Isolation of Trapped Nitrilium Intermediates, Benzoxazines 10–13.
Ar | product | yield (%) |
---|---|---|
2,6-diMe-Ph | 10 | 79 |
2-Me-6-Cl-Ph | 11 + 1 | 37 (4)a |
4-OMe-Ph | 12 + 1 | 39 (24)a |
naphth-2-yl | 13 + 1 | 33 (12)a |
Yield of 1.
Figure 1.
Molecular structure of benzoxazine intermediate 10. Another conformer with a slightly different conformation was identified in the crystal structure (shown in the Supporting Information).
When another, albeit sterically somewhat less hindered isocyanide, 2-chloro-6-methyl isocyanide, was used, 11 was isolated, which possessed the same benzoxazine scaffold as 10. The reaction, however, also afforded benzoxazole 1. Furthermore, the yield for 11 was significantly lower than that of 10, highlighting the importance of steric hindrance in stabilizing the benzoxazine structure. Benzoxazines (12 and 13) were isolated even when sterically nonhindered isocyanides were involved, in lower yields. A mixture of benzoxazole 1 and the appropriate benzoxazine was observed in these cases.
We hypothesized that benzoxazine 12 was an intermediate in the reaction route leading to benzoxazole 1. The following reaction mechanism for the formation of benzoxazoles was envisioned (Scheme 3): the ketone first forms a Schiff base (imine, A) with 2-aminophenol, which in turn is activated by the acidity of the system (the acid catalyst HOTf and/or the solvent TFE) thereby facilitating an attack by the isocyanide yielding the highly reactive nitrilium B. The phenolic OH of 2-aminophenol then participates in an intramolecular nucleophilic attack on the reactive nitrilium carbon, thus trapping the nitrilium to give the benzoxazine intermediate C.
Scheme 3. Proposed Mechanism for the Formation of Benzoxazole 1.
While C could be isolated (10–13), we found that it is very susceptible to nucleophilic attack by a second molecule of the bis-nucleophile 2-aminophenol. There is literature precedence for the intramolecular trapping of the nitrilium ion.9 It must be noted that products formed in most cases are stable and easily isolable, while benzoxazines (11–13) in the present case are extremely reactive to nucleophiles. The unique, reactive nature of this intramolecular nitrilium trapping allowed us to utilize benzoxazine intermediates to synthesize substituted benzoxazoles and other heterocyclic systems as shown later.
To test our proposed mechanism that the benzoxazine C is an intermediate in the synthesis of benzoxazoles, intermediate 12 was reacted with 2 equiv of 2-aminophenol in the presence of 0.1 equiv of HOTf in TFE, mimicking our one-pot reaction; benzoxazole 1 could be isolated in good yields (Table 4).
Table 4. Conversion of Benzoxazine Intermediate 12 to Diverse Heterocycles with Bis-Nucleophiles.
bis-nucleophile | product | yield (%) |
---|---|---|
2-aminophenol | 1 | 87 |
2-amino-4-chlorophenol | 14 | 63 |
1,2-diaminobenzene | 15 | 98 |
2-aminothiophenol | 16 | 93 |
cysteamine | 17 | 44 |
4-Chloro-2-aminophenol was also reacted with 12. Thus, a benzoxazole with a chloro substituent (14) was isolated increasing the diversity of this reaction. The scope was further enhanced by reacting the isolated benzoxazine intermediate with a series of bis-nucleophiles including 1,2-diaminobenzene, 2-aminothiophenol, and cysteamine to synthesize benzimidazole, benzothiazole, and dihydrothiazole derivatives (15–17), respectively. Owing to the hindered sterics of the system, benzoxazine 10 derived from sterically hindered 2,6-dimethylphenyl isocyanide was significantly more resistant to nucleophilic attack by bis-nucleophiles. Reactions at 55 °C failed in most cases, and only low conversion to the corresponding heterocycles was seen even at 85 °C.
To enhance the diversity and thus the possible biological relevance of the benzoxazole scaffold we decided to exploit the free phenolic OH and secondary aromatic amine of 1 to make second generation derivatives (Figure 2). The NH and the OH were cyclized using carbonyldiimadazole to make the bis-heterocyclic 18 carrying a benzoxazolone ring.11 The phenolic OH was also alkylated (22), carbamoylated (24), acylated (25), and converted to triflate. The triflate was in turn taken into Suzuki coupling12 with 2-bromophenylboronic acid, followed by Buchwald–Hartwig amination13 to generate a carbazole scaffold 21.14 The versatile leaving group triflate could be converted to a nitrile15 (23) which opens up routes to countless other derivatives well beyond the scope of the present publication (amines, amides, tetrazoles, halogens).
Figure 2.
Diversification of the novel benzoxazole scaffold 1.
In summary, we discovered a convenient, triflic acid catalyzed, isocyanide-based heterocycle-forming three-component reaction between 2-aminophenols, isocyanides, and ketones that leads to benzoxazoles and other heterocycles. The reaction progresses via a benzoxazine intermediate formed by intramolecular nucleophilic trapping of the reactive nitrilium intermediate by an adjacent phenolic group. Previous literature examples of nitrilium trapping yielded stable products, whereas in our case the trapped intermediates could be opened up by bis-nucleophiles. The reactivity of benzoxazine to bis-nucleophiles was leveraged to synthesize an array of heterocyclic scaffolds including benzimidazoles, dihydrothiazoles, and benzothiazoles. The reaction showed good functional group tolerance and is compatible with different ketones and aminophenols, ideal for the generation of molecule libraries under mild reaction conditions. The reactivity of the phenolic hydroxyl and the aromatic secondary amine was further exploited to diversify the scaffolds. Our future studies will focus on investigating and controlling the stereoselectivity of this reaction pathway.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by research grants from the National Institute of Drug Abuse to S.M. (DA034106-01) and G.W.P. (DA06241, DA02165, and DA07242) and a core grant from the National Cancer Institute to MSKCC (CA08748). The authors would like to thank Rashad Karimov at MSKCC, Molecular Pharmacology and Chemistry Program for his suggestions and critically reading this manuscript. The authors wish to thank George Sukenick and Rong Wang of the NMR Analytical Core Facility at MSKCC for their assistance with NMR and MS instruments and experiments. We thank the NYU Molecular Design Institute for the purchase of the Bruker SMART APEXII Diffractometer.
Supporting Information Available
Experimental details and spectroscopic data. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Funding Statement
National Institutes of Health, United States
Supplementary Material
References
- Hulme C.; Gore V. Curr. Med. Chem. 2003, 10, 51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dolle R. E.; Le Bourdonnec B.; Goodman A. J.; Morales G. A.; Thomas C. J.; Zhang W. J. Comb. Chem. 2008, 10, 753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Dömling A.; Wang W.; Wang K. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 3083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Dömling A.; Ugi I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Chandrasekharappa A. P.; Badiger S. E.; Dubey P. K.; Panigrahi S. K.; Manukonda S. R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2013, 23, 2579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Ulhaq S.; Chinje E. C.; Naylor M. A.; Jaffar M.; Stratford I. J.; Threadgill M. D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1999, 7, 1787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Horton D. A.; Bourne G. T.; Smythe M. L. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Hayashi S.; Hirao A.; Imai A.; Nakamura H.; Murata Y.; Ohashi K.; Nakata E. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Siracusa M. A.; Salerno L.; Modica M. N.; Pittalà V.; Romeo G.; Amato M. E.; Nowak M.; Bojarski A. J.; Mereghetti I.; Cagnotto A.; Mennini T. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 4529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar R. V. Asian J. Chem. 2004, 16, 1241. [Google Scholar]
- a Ruijter E.; Scheffelaar R.; Orru R. V. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 6234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Sunderhaus J. D.; Dockendorff C.; Martin S. F. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Tempest P.; Ma V.; Thomas S.; Hua Z.; Kelly M. G.; Hulme C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 4959. [Google Scholar]
- a Boissarie P. J.; Hamilton Z. E.; Lang S.; Murphy J. A.; Suckling C. J. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 6256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Spatz J. H.; Bach T.; Umkehrer M.; Bardin J.; Ross G.; Burdack C.; Kolb J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 9030. [Google Scholar]
- a El Kaim L.; Grimaud L. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 2153. [Google Scholar]; b Vlaar T.; Ruijter E.; Maes B. U. W.; Orru R. V. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 7084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Bienaymé H.; Bouzid K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Bonne D.; Dekhane M.; Zhu J. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 5285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Faggi C.; García-Valverde M. a.; Marcaccini S.; Menchi G. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Franckevičius V.; Longbottom D. A.; Turner R. M.; Ley S. V. Synthesis 2006, 19, 3215. [Google Scholar]; e García-González M. C.; González-Zamora E.; Santillan R.; Domínguez O.; Méndez-Stivalet J. M.; Farfán N. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 5337. [Google Scholar]; f Groebke K.; Weber L.; Mehlin F. Synlett 1998, 6, 661. [Google Scholar]; g Hashimoto T.; Kimura H.; Kawamata Y.; Maruoka K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 7279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h Heravi M.; Baghernejad B.; Oskooie H. Mol. Divers. 2009, 13, 395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i Krasavin M.; Parchinsky V. Synlett 2008, 5, 645. [Google Scholar]; j Kysil V.; Tkachenko S.; Khvat A.; Williams C.; Tsirulnikov S.; Churakova M.; Ivachtchenko A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 6239. [Google Scholar]; k Lei C.-H.; Wang D.-X.; Zhao L.; Zhu J.; Wang M.-X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 4708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; l Shaabani A.; Maleki A.; Mofakham H.; Khavasi H. R. J. Comb. Chem. 2008, 10, 323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; m Shaabani A.; Maleki A.; Moghimi-Rad J. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 6309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; n Soeta T.; Tamura K.; Ukaji Y. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 1226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Dai W.-M.; Li H. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 12866. [Google Scholar]; b Okandeji B. O.; Gordon J. R.; Sello J. K. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 5595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Poupaert J.; Carato P.; Colacino E.; Yous S. Curr. Med. Chem. 2005, 12, 877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miyaura N.; Suzuki A. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2457. [Google Scholar]
- Hartwig J. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Del Poeta M.; Schell W. A.; Dykstra C. C.; Jones S. K.; Tidwell R. R.; Kumar A.; Boykin D. W.; Perfect J. R. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1998, 42, 2503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kubota H.; Rice K. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 2907. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.