Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biofabrication. 2013 Dec 17;6(1):015002. doi: 10.1088/1758-5082/6/1/015002

Figure 2.

Figure 2

SEM images (A to D) and fibre diameter distribution histograms (E to H) for the different crosslinked co-axial fibre membranes 2PU10GE (A & E), 4PU10GE (B & F), 6PU10GE (C & G) and 8PU10GE (D & H) respectively. Average fibre diameters for each membrane were significantly different from all other membranes (p<0.05).