Abstract
The development of new bifunctional linchpins that permits the union of diverse building blocks is essential for the synthetic utility of Anion Relay Chemistry (ARC). Herein, we report the design, synthesis and validation of three vinylepoxide linchpins for through-bond/through-space ARC. For negative charge migration, this class of bifunctional linchpins employs initial through-bond ARC via an SN2′ reaction, followed by through-space ARC exploiting a 1,4-Brook rearrangement. Trans-Disubstituted vinylepoxide linchpin yields a mixture of E/Z-isomers, while cis-disubstituted and trans-trisubstituted vinylepoxide linchpins proceed to deliver three-component adducts with excellent E-selectivity.
Keywords: through-bond/through-space, anion relay chemistry, vinylepoxides, SN2’ addition, Brook rearrangement
Multi-component Anion Relay Chemistry (ARC) holds great promise for the construction of architecturally complex natural and unnatural products of biological significance.[1] This strategy permits rapid and efficient assembly of molecular complexity in a “single flask” with precise stereocontrol. The ARC tactic can be broadly divided into two classes based on the mode of negative charge migration, that is either “through-bond” or “through-space” (Figure 1).[1b] Through-bond ARC is defined as the transfer of negative charge via the bonding system of a molecule (i.e., conjugate addition reactions), while in through-space ARC, a carrier species is employed to facilitate negative charge migration (i.e., Brook rearrangement). Over the past decade we have reported extensive studies in the area of through-space ARC employing Brook rearrangements leading to the discovery of Type I and Type II ARC.[2] The synthetic utility of both Type I and Type II ARC tactics has been demonstrated in a number of completed or ongoing synthetic ventures, including (+)-spongistatins 1 and 2,[3] (+)-rimocidin,[4] (+)-spirastrellodlide A and B,[5] the indolizidine alkaloids (–)-223AB and (–)-205B,[6] and the Cryptocarya family of polyhydroxylated pyrone natural products.[7] For the future, development of new bifunctional linchpins that permit the union of diverse building blocks is essential for the synthetic utility of the ARC protocol.
Figure 1.
Classification of Anion Relay Chemistry.
With this goal in mind, we now present for the first time the combination of through-bond and through-space ARC with a new class of bifunctional linchpins, namely vinylepoxides 1, for the propagation of negative charge to deliver structural motifs not previously readily accessible (Figure 2). Specifically, addition of an external nucleophile to vinylepoxide linchpin 1 in an SN2′ fashion first generates an alkoxide anion upon negative charge migration through the bonding system (i.e., through-bond). Subsequent 1,4-Brook rearrangement, triggered by the addition of a polar additive (i.e., HMPA), relays the negative charge to a new carbon center (i.e., through-space). Trapping of the resultant dithiane anion with an electrophile would furnish multi-component adduct 4.
Figure 2.
Through-bond/through-space ARC exploiting vinylepoxides as bifunctional linchpins.
Vinylepoxides comprise an interesting class of electrophiles, as they possess more than one nucleofugal site, thus nucleophilic addition can proceed either through the SN2 or SN2′ manifold.[8] In the case at hand, selective SN2′ addition is necessary for the subsequent 1,4-Brook rearrangement. In addition, since a new double bond is generated upon the SN2′ addition, issues concerning E/Z-selectivity must also be addressed and resolved.
To explore the proposed through-bond/through-space ARC, we first constructed trans-disubstituted vinylepoxide 7 (Figure 3) as a bifunctional linchpin. Condensation of acrolein with malonic acid, followed by reduction with LiAlH4, furnished 2,4-pentadiene-1-ol (5).[9] Tungstic acid-catalyzed chemoselective epoxidation of the internal alkene,[10] followed by Appel reaction[11] with CBr4, led to bromovinylepoxide 6,[2b] which upon treatment with lithiated TMS-dithiane, underwent a highly chemoselective substitution reaction to furnish vinylepoxide 7. The structure of 7 was confirmed by X-ray crystallography.
Figure 3.
Synthesis of trans-disubstituted vinylepoxide linchpin 7.
With linchpin 7 in hand, the initial through-bond ARC via SN2′ addition was explored. We previously demonstrated that reaction of vinylepoxides with sterically hindered 2-substituted 1,3-dithiane anions proceeds predominantly in SN2′ fashion.[12] Organocuprates are also known to undergo selective SN2′ addition with vinylepoxides.[13] Therefore, lithiated dithianes and organocuprates were chosen as the initiating nucleophiles (Figure 4A). With lithiated TBS-dithiane, the optimal reaction conditions include Et2O as solvent, ambient reaction temperature, and a two hour reaction time. Premature Brook rearrangement was observed when the reaction was carried out in THF, or for an extended time in Et2O. Performing the reaction at 0 °C led to low conversion. Exploiting the optimal conditions, lithiation of TBS-dithiane (8) with n-BuLi in Et2O followed by addition to 7 furnished exclusively the SN2′ addition product 9 in 80% yield, albeit with modest level of E/Z-selectivity (E/Z = 2.5:1) (Eq. 1). Lithium dibutyl cuprate (10) (generated in situ from n-BuLi and CuI) proved to be a better nucleophile as the SN2′ addition proceeded readily at 0 °C with equally high efficiency and chemoselecitivity to furnish adduct 11 in 93% yield, again as a 2.5:1 mixture of E/Z-isomers (Eq. 2).
Figure 4.
Through-bond/through-space ARC with linchpin 7.
Having achieved a highly selective SN2′ addition to vinyl-epoxide 7, we next examined the combination of through-bond and through-space ARC in a “single flask” (Figure 4B). Upon addition of an external nucleophile to 7 under the aforementioned reaction conditions, HMPA was added to the resulting alkoxide at −40 °C to trigger 1,4-Brook rearrangement to generate a new dithiane anion, which was trapped with allyl bromide. Subsequent removal of the TMS group using 1.0 N HCl furnished the three-component adduct. Both lithiated TBS-dithiane and lithium dibutyl cuprate readily participate in through-bond/through-space ARC to yield three-component adducts 12 and 13, each as a 2.5:1 mixture of E/Z-isomers in 55% and 70% yields, respectively (Eqs. 3 and 4). Of particular note, both E and Z isomers undergo Brook arrangement and subsequent alkylation with equal efficiency.
To define the modest E/Z-selectivity of the SN2′ addition to 7, transition state models are proposed based on the stereoelectronic requirement[8] that necessitates a nearly coplanar arrangement of the alkene and the epoxide to permit effective interaction between the π-orbital and the breaking C–O bond (Figure 5A). Due to the lack of significant steric interactions between the S-trans (14) and S-cis (15) conformers, SN2′ addition results in a mixture of E/Z-isomers. The possibility, however, of greatly improved E/Z-selectivity in the case of cis-disubstituted and trans-trisubstituted vinylepoxides can be seen in Figure 5B and 5C. The presence of destabilizing steric interaction in S-cis conformers (17 and 19) would be expected to strongly disfavor these conformers, thus favoring the formation of E-alkene via SN2′ addition to the S-trans conformers (16 and 18). To explore this scenario, we turned to cis-disubstituted and trans-trisubstituted vinylepoxide linchpins.
Figure 5.
Transition state models to rationalize E/Z-selectivity.
Construction of cis-disubstituted vinylepoxide 22 is depicted in Figure 6. Mono-protection of (Z)-2-butene-1,4-diol with TBSCl, followed by epoxidation with m-CPBA furnished epoxy alcohol 20. Parikh-Doering oxidation[14] of the alcohol, followed by Wittig reaction with Ph3PMeBr[15] and removal of the TBS group, then led to vinylepoxy alcohol 21. Appel halogenation[11] with CBr4 and chemoselective substitution with lithiated TMS-dithiane completed the synthesis of 22, the structure of which was confirmed by X-ray crystallography.
Figure 6.
Synthesis of cis-disubstituted vinylepoxide linchpin 22.
With linchpin 22 in hand, we first explored the through-bond ARC via SN2′ addition (Figure 7). As expected, addition of lithiated TBS-dithiane to 22 at ambient temperature proceeded with excellent chemo- and stereoselectivity to furnish adduct E-9 exclusively in 67% yield (Eq. 1). Likewise, SN2′ addition of Bu2CuLi to 22 afforded adduct E-11 in 90% yield with E:Z ≥ 20:1 (Eq. 2).
Figure 7.
Through-bond ARC via SN2’ addition to linchpin 22.
We next examined the combined through-bond and through-space ARC with linchpin 22. As shown in Table 1, both lithiated TBS-dithiane and Bu2CuLi underwent sequential SN2′ addition to 22, 1,4-Brook rearrangement and alkylation with high efficiency and excellent selectivity (entry 1–3). Lithiated TMS-dithiane, which has previously been shown to undergo exclusive SN2 addition with vinylepoxides in THF/HMPA,[12] reacted with 22 in a strictly SN2′ fashion in Et2O to deliver adducts 24 and 25 in 85% and 56% yields, respectively (entry 4–5), demonstrating that a subtle change in solvent and additive, as illustrated here, can completely reverse the chemoselectivity in the nucleophilic addition to vinylepoxides.
Table 1.
Through-bond/through-space ARC with linchpin 22.a
![]() | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | NuLi | Yield | E:Zb | Products |
| 1) | ![]() |
80% | ≥ 20:1 | ![]() |
| 2) | 67% | ≥ 20:1 | ||
| 3) | Bu2CuLi | 71% | ≥ 20:1 | ![]() |
| 4) | ![]() |
85% | ≥ 20:1 | ![]() |
| 5) | 56% | ≥ 20:1 | ||
| 6) | 57% | ≥ 20:1 | ![]() |
|
| 7) | 47% | ≥ 20:1 | ||
Reaction conditions: i. 22, RLi, Et2O, rt, 2 h, or 22, R2CuLi, 0 °C, 1 h; ii. Electrophile, HMPA, Et2O, –40 °C to rt, 1 h, then, rt, 3 h; iii. 1.0 N HCl (aq).
E/Z ratio was determined by 1H NMR of the crude.
Lithiated alkyl dithianes also proved to be competent nucleophiles (entry 6–7). Both ethyl- and isopropyl-dithianes participated in the through-bond/through-space ARC with 22 to deliver three-component adducts 26 and 27 in 57% and 47% yields, respectively. In all cases, excellent chemoselectivity and E/Z-selectivity was observed (E:Z ≥ 20:1).
We next constructed trans-trisubstituted vinylepoxide 30 for through-bond/through-space ARC (Figure 8). Wittig reaction of (carbethoxyethylidene)triphenylphosphorane with acrolein,[16] followed by reduction with LiAlH4 and chemoselective epoxidation catalyzed by tungstic acid,[10] furnished dienol 28. Appel reaction[11] with CBr4 and chemoselective substitution with lithiated TMS-dithiane, in this case requiring catalytic TBAI due to steric encumbrance, completed the synthesis of vinylepoxide 30, the structure of which was confirmed by X-ray crystallography.
Figure 8.
Synthesis of trans-trisubstituted vinylepoxide linchpin 30.
The results for through-bond/through-space ARC with linchpin 30 are illustrated in Figure 9. As expected, the initial SN2′ addition of lithiated TBS-dithiane to 30 proceeded with excellent E-selectivity. However, due to premature Brook rearrangement, a 1:1 mixture of pre-Brook (31) and post-Brook (32) products was isolated in a combined yield of 83% (Eq. 1). Multiple attempts to minimize the premature Brook rearrangement in this case were unsuccessful. Pleasingly, “single-flask” through-bond/through-space ARC with 30 did proceed to deliver the desired product 33, albeit in only 35% yield (Eq. 2).[17]
Figure 9.
Through-bond/through-space ARC with linchpin 30. Reaction conditions: (a) i. 8, n-BuLi, Et2O, rt, 5 min; ii. 30, Et2O, rt, 2 h; (b) i. 8, n-BuLi, Et2O, rt, 5 min; ii. 30, Et2O, rt, 2 h; iii. Allyl bromide, HMPA, TBAI (2.5 mol%), rt, 5 h; iv. 2.0 N HCl, 36 h.
In summary, we have achieved the design, synthesis and validation of three vinylepoxide linchpins (7, 22 and 30) for through-bond/through-space ARC.[18] These vinylepoxides represent the first examples of a new class of bifunctional linchpins that employ both through-bond and through-space modes of negative charge migration to facilitate three-component union.
Experimental Section
General procedure for the through-bond/through-space ARC reaction and characterization of all new compounds are provided in the Supporting Information.
Supplementary Material
Footnotes
Financial support was provided by the NIH through Grant CA-19033, and GM-87605; XSEDE TG-CHE 120052, and an NCI postdoctoral fellowship (1F32CA171736-01) to M.Z.C. W e also thank Drs. R. Kohli and P. Carroll at the University of Pennsylvania for assistance in obtaining highresolution mass spectra and X-ray crystallography, respectively.
Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW under http://www.angewandte.org or from the author.
References
- 1.a) Smith AB, III, Adams CM. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004;37:365–377. doi: 10.1021/ar030245r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Smith AB, III, Wuest WM. Chem. Commun. 2008:5883–5895. doi: 10.1039/b810394a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.a) Smith AB, III, Boldi AM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997;119:6925–6926. [Google Scholar]; b) Smith AB, III, Pitram SM, Boldi AM, Gaunt MJ, Sfouggatakis C, Moser WH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:14435–14445. doi: 10.1021/ja0376238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Smith AB, Xian M, Kim W-S, Kim D-S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:12368–12369. doi: 10.1021/ja065033e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Smith AB, III, Xian M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:66–67. doi: 10.1021/ja057059w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.a) Smith AB, III, Doughty VA, Lin Q, Zhuang L, McBriar MD, Boldi AM, Moser WH, Murase N, Nakayama K, Sobukawa M. Angew. Chem. 2001;113:197–201. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20010105)40:1<191::AID-ANIE191>3.0.CO;2-C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001;40:191–195. [Google Scholar]; b) Smith AB, Lin Q, Doughty VA, Zhuang L, McBriar MD, Kerns JK, Brook CS, Murase N, Nakayama K. Angew. Chem. 2001;113:202–205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001;40:196–199. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Smith AB, III, Foley MA, Dong S, Orbin A. J. Org. Chem. 2009;74:5987–6001. doi: 10.1021/jo900765p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Smith AB, III, Smits H, Kim D-S. Tetrahedron. 2010;66:6597–6605. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2010.01.082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.a) Smith AB, III, Kim D-S. Org. Lett. 2004;6:1493–1495. doi: 10.1021/ol049601b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Smith AB, III, Kim D-S. Org. Lett. 2005;7:3247–3250. doi: 10.1021/ol0510264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Smith AB, III, Kim D-S. J. Org. Chem. 2006;71:2547–2557. doi: 10.1021/jo052314g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Melillo B, Smith AB., III Org. Lett. 2013;15:2282–2285. doi: 10.1021/ol400857k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Olofsson B, Somfai P. Vinylepoxides in Organic Synthesis. In: Yudin AK, editor. Aziridines and Epoxides in Organic Synthesis. Weinheim: VCH; 2006. pp. 315–343. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jiao X-Z, Xie P, Zu L-S, Liang X-T. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2003;5:165–169. doi: 10.1080/1028602031000066870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Prat D, Lett R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986;27:707–710. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Appel R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1975;14:801–811. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Smith AB, III, Pitram SM, Gaunt MJ, Kozmin SA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:14516–14517. doi: 10.1021/ja0283100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.a) Marshall JA. Chem. Rev. 1989;89:1503–1511. [Google Scholar]; b) Anderson RJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970;92:4978–4979. [Google Scholar]; c) Alexakis A, Cahiez G, Normant JF. Tetrahedron Lett. 1978;23:2027–2030. [Google Scholar]; d) Cahiez C, Alexakis A, Normant JF. Synthesis. 1978:528–530. [Google Scholar]; e) Araki S, Butsugan Y. Chem. Lett. 1980:185–186. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Parikh JR, Doering WvE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967;89:5505–5507. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wittig G, Schöllkopf U. Chem. Ber. 1954;87:1318–1330. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Piers E, Jung GL, Ruediger EH. Can. J. Chem. 1987;65:670–682. [Google Scholar]
- 17.This reaction proceeded to deliver the TMS-protected three-component adduct in ca. 52% yield. However, the desired product was inseparable with the quenched Brook intermediate.
- 18.Transition state energy calculations using B3LYP density functional theory were performed for the three vinylepoxides (7, 22 and 30). See supporting information for full computational details.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
















