Abstract
Phyto-endoparasitic nematodes induce specialized feeding cells (NFCs) in their hosts, termed syncytia and giant cells (GCs) for cyst and root-knot nematodes (RKNs), respectively. They differ in their ontogeny and global transcriptional signatures, but both develop cell wall ingrowths (CIs) to facilitate high rates of apoplastic/symplastic solute exchange showing transfer cell (TC) characteristics. Regulatory signals for TC differentiation are not still well-known. The two-component signaling system (2CS) and reactive oxygen species are proposed as inductors of TC identity, while, 2CSs-related genes are not major contributors to differential gene expression in early developing NFCs. Transcriptomic and functional studies have assigned a major role to auxin and ethylene as regulatory signals on early developing TCs. Genes encoding proteins with similar functions expressed in both early developing NFCs and typical TCs are putatively involved in upstream or downstream responses mediated by auxin and ethylene. Yet, no function directly associated to the TCs identity of NFCs, such as the formation of CIs is described for most of them. Thus, we reviewed similarities between transcriptional changes observed during the early stages of NFCs formation and those described during differentiation of TCs to hypothesize about putative signals leading to TC-like differentiation of NFCs with particular emphasis on auxin an ethylene.
Keywords: plant-nematode interaction, giant cells, early transcriptomic signatures, syncytia, auxin, ethylene, transfer cells, cell wall ingrowths
Introduction
Phyto-endoparasitic nematodes interact with their hosts in a subtle manner. They induce cells from the vascular cylinder to differentiate into specialized feeding cells (NFCs), syncytia, and giant cells (GCs), the nourishing cells for cyst and root-knot nematodes (RKNs), respectively (Jones and Goto, 2011; Sobczak and Golinowski, 2011). Although these two cell types clearly differ in their ontogeny, both develop cell wall ingrowths (CIs) believed to facilitate high rates of apoplastic/symplastic solute exchange typical of transfer cells (TCs; Jones and Dropkin, 1976; Siddique et al., 2012). In GCs the amplification of the plasma membrane surface area could be up to 20 fold (reviewed in Jones and Goto, 2011). CIs are less abundant in male-induced syncytia, suggesting a control probably associated with lower nutrient demand as the development of males inside the plant ends at the J3 stage (reviewed in Sobczak and Golinowski, 2009). Young syncytia are symplastically isolated, although this is lost at later stages (10–15 days post-infection, dpi; Hofmann et al., 2007) and symplastic isolation of GCs is under discussion (Hoth et al., 2008; Hofmann et al., 2010). Thus, amplification of plasma membrane area might be crucial for efficient apoplastic exchange at certain NFC developing stages. Polarized deposition of a thickened wall would need cell signals leading to this specialized differentiation. Those putative signals are still uncertain. Yet, some of the genes described to change their expression during TC differentiation participate in downstream cascades for gene expression driven by ethylene and auxin in epidermal cells of Vicia faba (Dibley et al., 2009) or in barley endosperm (Thiel et al., 2008, 2012a). In addition, genes involved in the biosynthesis of hormones such as auxin, ethylene jasmonic acid, brassinosteroids, gibberellins, and abscisic acid in maize basal endosperm (Xiong et al., 2011) are also differentially expressed in TCs.
Global transcriptomic changes of laser micro-dissected GCs at early developing stages (3 dpi; Barcala et al., 2010) and of micro-aspirated young syncytia (5 dpi; Szakasits et al., 2009) in Arabidopsis indicated that only 529 genes out of 1161 in GCs and 7225 in syncytia (representing 45.5 and 7.3% of the differentially expressed genes in each transcriptome, respectively) are shared. This indicates that transcriptomic similarities are not high between both nematode-induced cell types. However, key changes in the expression of genes related to several hormones such as auxin, ethylene, jasmonic acid, or abscisic acid are shared between both NFCs (Cabrera et al., 2013).
Only some data on TC regulatory signals in NFCs have been described, i.e., ZmMRP-1 codes for a primary sensor of the putative signals for TCs and the activity of this TC-specific promoter ZmMRP-1 (Gomez et al., 2002) was monitored in Arabidopsis transgenic plants; GUS activity was detected in the feeding sites induced by Meloidogyne javanica. Those are swollen parts of the roots (galls) where GCs are embedded surrounded by heterogeneous tissues. Although gall microscopy sections were not examined, the confined GUS activity observed suggests that the promoter is probably active in GCs (Barrero et al., 2009). Further research will elucidate whether this TC-specific molecular signature is also present in syncytia formed by cyst nematodes. In order to unveil some clues on putative signals leading to TC-like differentiation of NFCs, we review similarities between transcriptional changes observed during the early stages of NFCs formation and those described during differentiation of TCs. Global gene expression studies comparing syncytia and GCs to TCs signatures could be a starting point to find some answers.
Auxin and ethylene as putative signals initiating TC-like morphology of NFCs
During the last few years, several transcriptomic studies on early developing TCs have assigned a major role to hormone regulation on the processes leading to the differentiation of these cell types. Auxin (Dibley et al., 2009) and ethylene (Thiel et al., 2008, 2012a,b; Dibley et al., 2009; Zhou et al., 2010; Xiong et al., 2011) raised as the two major phytohormones implicated in the differentiation of TCs from different plants and tissues. In adaxial epidermal cells of cultured V. faba cotyledons trans-differentiating to TCs, auxin and ethylene cis-responsive elements were over-represented in the promoters of induced genes. There is a clear functional demonstration that both hormones regulate CI formation in V. faba epidermis, based mainly in pharmacological experiments, indicating their participation in the signaling events leading to TCs differentiation (Dibley et al., 2009; Zhou et al., 2010). Moreover, an increase in auxin and ethylene levels boosts TC formation in tomato roots (Schikora and Schmidt, 2002). Accordingly, a clear over-representation of auxin-regulated genes among the 310 up-regulated genes in Arabidopsis 3 dpi GCs, relative to the total number of hormone responsive genes described in Nemhauser et al. (2006), was observed (Cabrera et al., 2013). Among those upstream genes regulated by auxin are genes in the AUX/IAA group, as IAA8 (Table 1). Genes in this category were also induced in the transcriptome of V. faba developing TCs, such as GH1 (Dibley et al., 2009). The development of Heterodera shachtii, a syncytia-forming nematode, was impaired in the axr2 mutant, that also corresponds to the IAA group member IAA7 (Goverse et al., 2000), and IAA26 is induced in the transcriptome of 5 dpi microaspirated syncytia (Table 1; Szakasits et al., 2009). AUX/IAA proteins function by interacting with auxin responsive factors (ARFs) that were also induced in GCs, like MONOPTEROS (MP; ARF5) or ARF19 (Table 1). In syncytia, ARF4 and ARF6 are up-regulated, but not co-regulated with GCs. ARF4 has been defined to be preferentially expressed in the phloem companion cells of Arabidopsis (Table 1; Brady et al., 2007), the TCs found in loading and unloading areas of vascular tissues. Therefore, ARFs are induced in both NFCs triggered by cyst and RKNs at early infection stages, although different family members are involved in each NFC type. Strikingly, 20% of the genes defined by Brady et al. (2007) as preferentially expressed in the companion cells of Arabidopsis are also up-regulated in syncytia (44 out of 222 genes; Cabrera et al., 2013).
Table 1.
Genes induced in the 3 dpi GCs and 5 dpi syncytia transcriptomes (Szakasits et al., 2009; Barcala et al., 2010), that are also described to be regulated by auxin and/or ethylene in Nemhauser et al. (2006) and in Mapman (Thimm et al., 2004).
Syncytia 5 dpi | |||
---|---|---|---|
CELL | |||
AT1G10740 | IAA | 1.0 | Unknown protein |
AT3G10530 | IAA | 2.3 | Transducin family protein/WD-40 repeat family protein |
CELL WALL | |||
AT1G53840 | IAA | 2.1 | PME1: encodes a pectin methylesterase |
AT2G39700 | IAA | 4.2 | EXPA4: putative expansin. Naming convention from the Expansin Working Group |
AT4G25810 | IAA | 5.1 | XTR6: xyloglucan endotransglycosylase-related protein (XTR6) |
AT5G06860 | IAA | 3.4 | PGIP1: Encodes a polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein involved in defense response |
AT5G57560 | IAA | 4.4 | TCH4: Encodes a cell wall-modifying enzyme |
AT5G66460 | IAA | 3.1 | MAN7: (1-4)-beta-mannan endohydrolase |
DEVELOPMENT | |||
AT5G57390 | ACC | 1.1 | AIL5: Encodes a member of the AP2 family of transcriptional regulators |
AT1G01470 | IAA | 2.0 | LEA14: Encodes late-embryogenesis abundant protein |
HORMONE METABOLISM | |||
AT1G48420 | ACC | 1.4 | D-CDES: Encodes an enzyme that decomposes D-cysteine into pyruvate, H2S, and NH3 |
AT2G42680 | ACC | 1.1 | MBF1A: One of three genes in A. thaliana encoding multiprotein-bridging factor 1 |
AT3G16050 | ACC | 2.0 | PDX1.2: Encodes a protein with pyridoxal phosphate synthase activity |
AT3G58680 | ACC | 1.6 | MBF1B: One of three genes in A. thaliana encoding multiprotein-bridging factor 1 |
AT4G26200 | ACC | 1.2 | ACS7: Member of a family of proteins in Arabidopsis that encode ACC synthase |
AT4G34410 | ACC | 1.5 | RRTF1: encodes a member of the ERF (ethylene response factor) subfamily B-3 |
AT5G20550 | ACC | 1.7 | Oxidoreductase, 2OG-Fe(II) oxygenase family protein |
AT5G43440 | ACC | 1.3 | Encodes a protein whose sequence is similar to ACC oxidase |
AT5G43450 | ACC, IAA | 1.2 | Encodes a protein whose sequence is similar to ACC oxidase |
AT1G17350 | IAA | 3.3 | Auxin-induced-related/indole-3-acetic acid induced-related |
AT1G50580 | IAA | 1.5 | Glycosyltransferase family protein |
AT1G56150 | IAA | 3.1 | Auxin-responsive family protein |
AT1G60690 | IAA | 0.9 | Aldo/keto reductase family protein |
AT2G02560 | IAA | 1.4 | CAND1: Arabidopsis thaliana homolog of human CAND1 |
AT3G25290 | IAA | 1.6 | Auxin-responsive family protein |
AT3G25780 | IAA | 1.2 | AOC3: Encodes allene oxide cyclase |
AT3G30300 | IAA | 1.2 | FUNCTIONS IN: molecular_function unknown; INVOLVED IN: biological_process unknown |
AT3G63440 | IAA | 3.2 | CKX6: encodes a protein whose sequence is similar to cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase |
AT4G12410 | IAA | 2.8 | Auxin-responsive family protein |
AT4G12980 | IAA | 0.7 | Auxin-responsive protein |
AT4G27450 | IAA | 1.1 | Unknown protein |
AT4G34760 | IAA | 1.5 | Auxin-responsive family protein |
AT5G20810 | IAA | 0.4 | Auxin-responsive protein |
AT5G54510 | IAA | 2.7 | DFL1: Encodes an IAA-amido synthase that conjugates Ala, Asp, Phe, and Trp to auxin |
AT5G55540 | IAA | 0.8 | TRN1: Encodes a large plant-specific protein of unknown function |
AT5G64600 | IAA | 2.3 | Unknown protein |
METAL HANDLING | |||
AT2G37330 | IAA | 1.3 | ALS3: Encodes an ABC transporter-like protein |
MISCELLANEA | |||
AT2G29440 | ACC | 1.7 | GSTU6: Encodes glutathione transferase belonging to the tau class of GSTs |
AT3G11210 | ACC, IAA | 1.2 | GDSL-motif lipase/hydrolase family protein |
AT1G30760 | IAA | 6.2 | FAD-binding domain-containing protein |
AT2G30140 | IAA | 2.8 | UGT87A2: UDP-glucoronosyl/UDP-glucosyl transferase family protein |
AT3G11210 | IAA | 1.2 | GDSL-motif lipase/hydrolase family protein |
AT3G62720 | IAA | 1.3 | XT1: Encodes a protein with xylosyltransferase activity |
AT5G19440 | IAA | 2.3 | Similar to Eucalyptus gunnii alcohol dehydrogenase |
N-METABOLISM | |||
AT3G49640 | IAA | 1.5 | FAD binding/catalytic/tRNA dihydrouridine synthase |
NOT ASSIGNED | |||
AT3G02490 | ACC | 1.2 | Pentatricopeptide (PPR) repeat-containing protein |
AT4G33560 | ACC | 3.6 | Unknown protein |
AT5G49410 | ACC | 0.5 | Unknown protein |
AT5G02550 | ACC, IAA | 1.1 | Unknown protein |
AT1G03820 | IAA | 3.0 | Unknown protein |
AT1G08430 | IAA | 4.1 | ALMT1: Encodes a Al-activated malate efflux transporter |
AT1G18850 | IAA | 1.6 | Unknown protein |
AT1G28400 | IAA | 3.0 | Unknown protein |
AT1G32190 | IAA | 0.7 | INVOLVED IN: N-terminal protein myristoylation; LOCATED IN: plasma membrane |
AT1G32920 | IAA | 1.6 | Unknown protein |
AT1G55500 | IAA | 1.1 | ECT4 |
AT2G34260 | IAA | 2.3 | WDR55: transducin family protein/WD-40 repeat family protein |
AT2G39725 | IAA | 2.5 | Complex 1 family protein/LVR family protein |
AT3G16310 | IAA | 2.4 | Mitotic phosphoprotein N' end (MPPN) family protein |
AT4G20170 | IAA | 1.5 | GALS3 |
AT5G52910 | IAA | 0.6 | ATIM: homolog of Drosophila timeless |
AT5G64780 | IAA | 1.1 | FUNCTIONS IN: molecular_function unknown; INVOLVED IN: biological_process unknown |
AT5G66440 | IAA | 1.6 | Unknown protein |
TRANSPORT | |||
AT1G77380 | ACC | 2.7 | AAP3: Amino acid permease which transports basic amino acids |
AT2G39350 | ACC, IAA | 1.9 | ABCG1: ABC transporter family protein |
AT2G23150 | IAA | 3.2 | NRAMP3: Encodes a member of the Nramp2 metal transporter family |
PROTEIN | |||
AT1G26270 | ACC | 2.6 | Phosphatidylinositol 3- and 4-kinase family protein |
AT5G65450 | ACC | 1.1 | UBP17: Encodes a ubiquitin-specific protease |
AT5G63650 | ACC, IAA | 2.0 | SNRK2.5: encodes a member of SNF1-related protein kinases |
AT3G04230 | IAA | 1.8 | 40S ribosomal protein S16 |
AT3G17090 | IAA | 1.1 | Protein phosphatase 2C family protein |
AT3G60640 | IAA | 2.0 | ATG8G: microtubule binding |
AT4G22380 | IAA | 1.7 | Ribosomal protein L7Ae/L30e/S12e/Gadd45 family protein |
REDOX | |||
AT2G16060 | ACC | 1.3 | HB1: Encodes a class 1 non-symbiotic hemoglobin |
AT4G14965 | IAA | 1.0 | MAPR4: heme binding |
RNA | |||
AT1G21910 | ACC | 1.0 | DREB26: member of the DREB subfamily A-5 of ERF/AP2 transcription factor family |
AT1G71450 | ACC | 0.6 | Member of the DREB subfamily A-4 of ERF/AP2 transcription factor family |
AT1G77200 | ACC | 0.7 | Member of the DREB subfamily A-4 of ERF/AP2 transcription factor family |
AT3G16770 | ACC | 1.8 | EBP: member of the ERF subfamily B-2 of the ERF/AP2 transcription factor family |
AT5G43170 | ACC | 0.8 | ZF3: Encodes zinc finger protein |
AT5G67180 | ACC | 0.8 | TOE3:|AP2 domain-containing transcription factor, putative |
AT2G34140 | ACC, IAA | 0.7 | Dof-type zinc finger domain-containing protein |
AT1G16530 | IAA | 1.1 | ASL9: Symbols: LBD3, ASL9 |ASL9 (ASYMMETRIC LEAVES 2 LIKE 9) |
AT1G27730 | IAA | 1.2 | STZ: Related to Cys2/His2-type zinc-finger proteins |
AT1G30330 | IAA | 0.9 | ARF6: Mediates auxin response via expression of auxin-regulated genes |
AT2G33860 | IAA | 1.3 | ARF3 (ETT) encodes a protein with homology to DNA-binding proteins which bind to AuxREs |
AT2G47260 | IAA | 1.9 | WRKY23: Encodes a member of WRKY Transcription Factor |
AT3G11580 | IAA | 1.6 | DNA-binding protein, putative |
AT3G16500 | IAA | 1.8 | IAA26 (PAP1) phytochrome-associated protein 1 |
AT3G23250 | IAA | 1.8 | MYB15: Member of the R2R3 factor gene family |
AT4G02220 | IAA | 1.2 | Programmed cell death 2 C-terminal domain-containing protein |
AT4G21550 | IAA | 1.4 | VAL3: Symbols: VAL3 |VAL3 (VP1/ABI3-LIKE 3); transcription factor |
AT5G60450 | IAA | 0.8 | ARF4: member of the ARF family of transcription factors which mediate auxin responses |
SECONDARY METAB. | |||
AT5G01210 | ACC, IAA | 2.1 | Transferase family protein |
SIGNALING | |||
AT1G35140 | IAA | 2.8 | PHI-1 |
AT1G76650 | IAA | 1.3 | CML38: calcium-binding EF hand family protein |
AT2G25790 | IAA | 1.3 | Leucine-rich repeat transmembrane protein kinase |
AT2G30060 | IAA | 0.9 | Ran-binding protein 1b |
AT4G08950 | IAA | 3.8 | EXO: EXORDIUM |
AT4G28490 | IAA | 1.9 | HAE: member of Receptor kinase-like protein family |
AT5G05160 | IAA | 1.1 | RUL1: leucine-rich repeat transmembrane protein kinase |
AT5G12940 | IAA | 1.1 | Leucine-rich repeat family protein |
AT5G37770 | IAA | 2.0 | TCH2: Encodes a protein with 40% similarity to calmodulin |
STRESS | |||
AT2G42530 | ACC | 1.8 | COR15B: COLD REGULATED 15B |
AT5G64900 | IAA | 1.4 | PROPEP1: Encodes a putative 92-aa protein that is the precursor of AtPep1 |
Giant cells 3 dpi | |||
CELL WALL | |||
AT4G25810 | IAA | 1.1 | XTR6: xyloglucan endotransglycosylase-related protein |
HORMONE METABOLISM | |||
AT3G23150 | ACC | 2.1 | ETR2: Involved in ethylene perception in Arabidopsis |
AT4G20880 | ACC | 2.4 | Ethylene-responsive nuclear protein/ethylene-regulated nuclear protein |
AT2G23170 | IAA | 1.0 | GH3.3: IAA-amido synthase that conjugates Asp and other amino acids to auxin in vitro |
AT3G50660 | IAA | 1.0 | DWF4: hydroxylase whose reaction is a rate-limiting step in brassinosteroid biosynthetic pathway |
AT4G27260 | IAA | 0.8 | WES1: IAA-amido synthase that conjugates Asp and other amino acids to auxin in vitro |
AT4G39400 | IAA | 1.4 | BRI1: plasma membrane localized leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase |
AT5G25190 | IAA, ACC | 3.2 | ESE3: encodes a member of the ERF (ethylene response factor) subfamily B-6 of ERF/AP2 family |
LIPID METABOLISM | |||
AT4G12110 | IAA | 1.9 | SMO1-1: Encodes a member of the SMO1 family of sterol 4alpha-methyl oxidases |
METAL HANDLING | |||
AT3G24450 | IAA | 1.8 | Copper-binding family protein |
NOT ASSIGNED | |||
AT4G33560 | ACC | 2.3 | Unknown protein |
AT2G39370 | IAA | 2.9 | MAKR4: unknown protein |
POLYAMINE METABOLISM | |||
AT5G19530 | IAA | 1.8 | ACL5: Encodes a spermine synthase |
PROTEIN | |||
AT3G61160 | IAA | 1.8 | Shaggy-related protein kinase beta/ASK-beta (ASK2) |
AT3G27580 | IAA, ACC | 2.5 | ATPK7: a member of a subfamily of Ser/Thr PKs |
REDOX | |||
AT2G16060 | ACC | 2.4 | HB1: Encodes a class 1 non-symbiotic hemoglobin |
RNA | |||
AT1G19220 | IAA | 1.6 | ARF19: auxin response factor |
AT1G19850 | IAA | 4.1 | MP: Encodes a transcription factor (IAA24) |
AT2G22670 | IAA | 1.2 | IAA8: IAA8 (IAA8) gene is auxin inducible |
AT3G02550 | IAA | 2.5 | LBD41: LOB DOMAIN-CONTAINING PROTEIN 41 |
AT4G17460 | IAA | 4.3 | HAT1: Encodes homeobox protein HAT1 |
AT4G36540 | IAA | 1.0 | BEE2: BR Enhanced Expression 2 |
AT5G47370 | IAA | 2.7 | HAT2: homeobox-leucine zipper genes induced by auxin |
AT5G65310 | IAA | 1.1 | HB5: class I HDZip (homeodomain-leucine zipper) protein |
SIGNALING | |||
AT1G21980 | IAA | 1.4 | PIP5K1: Type I phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase |
AT1G68400 | IAA | 1.8 | Leucine-rich repeat transmembrane protein kinase |
AT2G25790 | IAA | 1.1 | Leucine-rich repeat transmembrane protein kinase |
Third column shows the Log2 value for each gene in syncytia or GCs.
Other genes in the TCs induced in the epidermis of V. faba include those that could alter auxin transport through PINs relocalization or enhanced biosynthesis, as nitrilases (Dibley et al., 2009), proposed to alter the pattern of auxin redistribution to drive CI formation. Redistribution of PINs and reduction of nematode reproduction in PIN-related mutants such as pin2, pin3, pin4, pin7, and several double mutants, together with pharmacological treatments with inhibitors of auxin transport, demonstrated that cyst nematodes are able to hijack the auxin distribution network (Grunewald et al., 2009). Similarly, the nematode effectors Hg19C07 and Hs19C07 of H. glycines and H. schachtii directly interact with the auxin influx transporter LAX3 and infectivity in aux1/lax3 double mutants was severely affected (Lee et al., 2011). Interpretations pointed as a process to facilitate the infection and establishment of nematodes during early stages of the plant-nematode interaction. However, the ability of CIs formation that lead to the TCs nature of NFCs, have not been ever studied in those mutants. Thus, further research with loss of function mutants will be needed to characterize auxin signaling pathways involved in TC character of syncytia and GCs.
Other downstream auxin responsive genes up-regulated in GCs are WES1 and GH3 (Table 1). In syncytia, there is also the GH3-like, DFL1 that regulates lateral root formation through the auxin signaling pathway (Table 1; Nakazawa et al., 2001). The synthetic promoter DR5, derived from the GH3 promoter, has been extensively used to check early increases in local auxin also in NFCs (Karczmarek et al., 2004). It is interesting to point that DR5::GUS expression is located in the GCs and vascular surrounding tissues (Cabrera et al., unpublished results). This suggests that auxin concentration is very high at early infection stages in GCs as compared to the rest of the gall tissues. There are several hypotheses to explain this local increase in auxin levels, i.e., the presence of auxins in the nematode secretions (De Meutter et al., 2005), or the manipulation of auxin homeostasis through the interaction of nematode effectors as chorismate mutase with the plant biochemical machinery (Jones et al., 2003). Interestingly, local production of isoflavonoids could also result in a local auxin increase as they inhibit polar auxin transport. Promoters of genes encoding chalcone synthases involved in the first step of flavonoid biosynthesis are induced in galls of clover (Grunewald et al., 2009), and genes in the category of flavonoid metabolism were induced in syncytia (Cabrera et al., 2013). However, several Arabidopsis mutants impaired in isoflavonoid biosynthesis were not affected in either syncytia or GCs formation (Jones et al., 2007; Wasson et al., 2009). These studies indicate that it is unlikely that flavonoids mediate changes in auxin transport needed for nematode feeding site organogenesis, although galls of Medicago truncatula flavonoid-deficient roots were shorter (Wasson et al., 2009). These findings suggest that the local flavonoid increase encountered in galls (Hutangura et al., 1999; Wasson et al., 2009) might have an alternative role not directly related to the process of infection and establishment. Perhaps flavonoids are related to CI formation needed for the acquisition of TCs characteristics, as suggested by Dibley et al. (2009) in TCs from epidermal cells of V. faba. This is another open question that deserves further investigation.
During differentiation of TCs in the endosperm of barley (Thiel et al., 2012a) or trans-differentiation of epidermal cells in V. faba (Dibley et al., 2009), ethylene is proposed to participate in a signaling pathway initiating TCs morphology. Similarly to the auxin responsive genes induced in the NFC transcriptomes, some genes involved in ethylene perception, transduction, and responses are also up-regulated in GCs (Table 1; ETR2, ESE3). Ethylene responsive genes were over-represented among the 310 up-regulated genes in GCs, relative to the total number of hormone responsive genes in Nemhauser et al. (2006), Cabrera et al. (2013). ETR2 induction coincides with the presence of other ethylene receptors (as ETR1) in developing TCs from barley and rice endosperm (Thiel et al., 2012b). The ethylene precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) directly enhanced TC formation in root epidermal cells of tomato (Schikora and Schmidt, 2002) and adaxial epidermal cells of V. faba cotyledons (Dibley et al., 2009). Consistently, a pool of genes encoding proteins related with ethylene synthesis like two ACC oxidases (Table 1), are induced in the transcriptome of microaspirated syncytia. Functional analysis of the Arabidopsis ethylene overproducing mutants eto2 and eto3 resulted in hyper-susceptibility to cyst nematodes (Goverse et al., 2000; Wubben et al., 2001). Interestingly, ethylene overproduction in eto2 mutants stimulated the formation of CIs or protuberances in syncytia along the vascular tissue, at late infection stages (Goverse et al., 2000), providing a direct evidence for a putative role of ethylene in the stimulation of syncytia TCs characteristics. Accordingly, functional analysis of Arabidopsis mutants compromised in several steps of the signaling cascade leading to activation of ethylene responsive genes, as those altered in ethylene-insensitive mutants (etr1-1, ein2-1, ein3-1, eir1-1, and axr2), were less susceptible to H. schachtii (Wubben et al., 2001). Hence, several ACC synthase coding genes were induced at early infection stages, increasing and reaching a maximum at 20 dpi in soybean infected with H. glycines (Tucker et al., 2010). Strikingly, ethylene production upon nematode infection has been long known in tomato infected with RKNs (M. Javanica), with a peak at medium infection stages (4–16 dpi; Glazer et al., 1983), similar to several dicotyledonous species (Glazer et al., 1985). However, not much is known on the behavior of ethylene-related mutants infected with RKNs. Experiments on Lotus japonica expressing ETR-1 were not conclusive of its putative role on RKN infection (Lohar and Bird, 2003). Undoubtedly, analysis are still lacking on the morphologic characteristics of developed syncytia in loss of function mutants of genes related to ethylene transduction pathways that could confirm their role on the induction of syncytia TCs characteristics, such us the presence of CI. Regarding RKNs, virtually no data on the TCs features of GCs in ethylene mutants are still available.
Two-component signaling systems and reactive oxygen species as inducers of TC identity in NFCs
Recently, Thiel et al. (2012b) suggested a role for a two-component signaling system (2CS) in cellularization and differentiation of barley endosperm TCs, possibly coupled to hormonal regulation by abscisic acid and ethylene. In plants, 2CSs require a hybrid histidine kinase (HK; located in the plasma membrane) with both histidine kinase and receiver domains, a histidine-containing phosphotransfer protein (HPt), and a response regulator that mediates downstream signaling through phosphorylation. In Arabidopsis, proteins with significant sequence similarities to all elements of the 2CSs have been identified (reviewed in Schaller et al., 2008). We have searched for genes encoding those components in the early GCs and syncytia transcriptomes (Szakasits et al., 2009; Barcala et al., 2010; Table S1). In Arabidopsis, genes encoding 8 HK and 9 HK-like proteins (HKL) have been identified and 2 of them are up-regulated in GCs (ETR2) or syncytia (PDK). However, most HKs and HKLs are down-regulated in NFCs. ETR2, HK2, HK3, ERS1, and PHYA are down-regulated in syncytia and HK1 and CKI1 in GCs (Cabrera et al., 2013; Table S1). Moreover, the two up-regulated genes in NFCs are HKLs that lack residues essential to histidine kinase activity. The Arabidopsis genome encodes five HPt proteins (AHP1-5) that act as signaling intermediates between HKs and response regulators. From them, AHP3 is up-regulated in syncytia while AHP1 is down-regulated, and the rest of the genes are not differentially expressed in the transcriptome of micro-dissected GCs and syncytia (Barcala et al., 2010; Cabrera et al., 2013; Table S1). The last components of the system are the response regulators, with 33 genes identified in the Arabidopsis genome (23 response regulators and 10 pseudo-response regulators; Schaller et al., 2008), most of them down-regulated as well in NFCs (only ARR7 and RR14 are up-regulated in syncytia; Cabrera et al., 2013; Table S1). Thus, the transcriptomic evidence at early differentiation stages of syncytia and GCs suggests that genes involved in 2CSs do not contribute substantially to the differential gene expression observed in NFCs. Thus, 2CSs are not likely participating in the first signaling steps involved in the acquisition of TCs identify in NFCs.
Recently, it has been shown that H2O2 functions downstream of ethylene to activate cell wall biosynthesis and direct polarized deposition of a uniform wall on which CIs formed in TCs of V. faba cotyledons (Andriunas et al., 2012). The presence of a H2O2-generating mechanism dependent upon NADPH oxidase (NOX) activity was suggested (Andriunas et al., 2012). From the 10 RBOH genes encoding the catalytic subunit of NOX in Arabidopsis (reviewed in Sagi and Fluhr, 2006), 7 are down-regulated in syncytia, and none of them are differentially expressed in GCs (Cabrera et al., 2013). Additionally, defense-related genes described as related to TCs development, as in endosperm TCs where the ethylene response is possibly coupled to activated defense mechanisms (Thiel et al., 2008), are not abundant in NFCs. On the contrary, a general repression of plant defenses is obvious from the transcriptomes of early developing syncytia in Arabidopsis, where more than 35 peroxidases were repressed (Szakasits et al., 2009). Similarly, in early developing GCs of Arabidopsis and tomato not only peroxidases, but many genes from the secondary metabolism related to plant defenses were also down-regulated at 3 dpi (Barcala et al., 2010; Portillo et al., 2013). All these data suggest that active oxygen species such as H2O2 very unlikely function as early inducing signals for TCs identity of NFCs coupled to hormone signaling. However, it is important to point that we cannot discard the possibility of the activation of an oxidative burst in medium-late stages of NFCs development that might be participating in this process.
Final remarks
It is interesting to point that many genes induced in early differentiating NFCs correspond to typical categories of downstream regulated genes that might participate in CIs formation, as those involved in vesicle trafficking, cell wall biogenesis, cell shape control and expansion, or nutrient transport, also induced in cells undergoing differentiation into TCs (Thiel et al., 2008, 2012a; Dibley et al., 2009; Xiong et al., 2011). Many other downstream genes are also induced in NFCs contributing to their development or maintenance (reviewed in Kyndt et al., 2013). Genes associated to changes in the cytoskeleton include those encoding tubulins, actins, microtubule-binding proteins, as the IAA-induced ATG8G (Table 1) or AtFH6, a formin encoding gene that regulates polarized growth by controlling the assembly of actin cables in Arabidopsis GCs (Favery et al., 2004). However, no functions directly associated to the TCs characteristics of NFCs have been yet described for those genes in NFCs (Kyndt et al., 2013). Other genes possibly related to active nutrient uptake into syncytia and GCs are also up-regulated by either auxin (NRAMP3), ethylene (AAP3), or both (ABCG1; Table 1). However, functional studies of these genes in NFCs are very scarce (reviewed in Kyndt et al., 2013). In addition, genes encoding cell wall modifying enzymes as pectin methylesterases, expansins, xyloglucan endotransglycosylases (EXP4, XTR6, PME1, XTR6), all induced by auxin, were also induced in NFCs (Table 1). Interestingly, the most clarifying study of a functional implication in TCs characteristic of NFCs, as the CIs formation, comes from the analysis of UDP-glucose dehydrogenase (UGD) coding genes. UGDs act through oxidation of UDP-glucose producing several cell wall polysaccharides. UGD2 and UGD3 are necessary for the production of CIs in syncytia and loss of function in double mutants severely affected nematode development (Siddique et al., 2012).
In conclusion, although genes encoding proteins with similar functions are differentially expressed in differentiating NFCs and typical TCs, a clear knowledge of their implication, either upstream or downstream, in the signaling cascades leading to TCs characteristics of NFCs is still lacking. Further research will probably elucidate the contribution of signals such as hormones to those differentiation events in NFCs.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Spanish Government (AGL2010-17388 to Carolina Escobar, CSD2007-057 to Carmen Fenoll) and the Castilla-La Mancha Government (PCI08-0074-0294 to Carmen Fenoll and Carolina Escobar). Javier Cabrera was supported by a fellowship from the Ministry of Education, Spain.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://www.frontiersin.org/journal/10.3389/fpls.2014.00107/abstract
References
- Andriunas F. A., Zhang H.-M., Xia X., Offler C. E., McCurdy D. W., Patrick J. W. (2012). Reactive oxygen species form part of a regulatory pathway initiating trans-differentiation of epidermal transfer cells in Vicia faba cotyledons. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 3617–3629 10.1093/jxb/ers029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barcala M., Garcia A., Cabrera J., Casson S., Lindsey K., Favery B., et al. (2010). Early transcriptomic events in microdissected Arabidopsis nematode-induced giant cells. Plant J. 61, 698–712 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04098.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barrero C., Royo J., Grijota-Martinez C., Faye C., Paul W., Sanz S., et al. (2009). The promoter of ZmMRP-1, a maize transfer cell-specific transcriptional activator, is induced at solute exchange surfaces and responds to transport demands. Planta 229, 235–247 10.1007/s00425-008-0823-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brady S. M., Orlando D. A., Lee J.-Y., Wang J. Y., Koch J., Dinneny J. R., et al. (2007). A high-resolution root spatiotemporal map reveals dominant expression patterns. Science 318, 801–806 10.1126/science.1146265 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cabrera J., Bustos R., Favery B., Fenoll C., Escobar C. (2013). NEMATIC: a simple and versatile tool for the in silico analysis of plant-nematode interactions. Mol. Plant Pathol. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1111/mpp.12114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Meutter J., Tytgat T., Prinsen E., Gheysen G., Van Onckelen H., Gheysen G. (2005). Production of auxin and related compounds by the plant parasitic nematodes Heterodera schachtii and Meloidogyne incognita. Commun. Agric. Appl. Biol. Sci. 70, 51–60 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dibley S. J., Zhou Y., Andriunas F. A., Talbot M. J., Offler C. E., Patrick J. W., et al. (2009). Early gene expression programs accompanying trans-differentiation of epidermal cells of Vicia faba cotyledons into transfer cells. New Phytol. 182, 863–877 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02822.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Favery B., Chelysheva L. A., Lebris M., Jammes F., Marmagne A., De Almeida-Engler J., et al. (2004). Arabidopsis formin AtFH6 is a plasma membrane–associated protein upregulated in giant cells induced by parasitic nematodes. Plant Cell Online 16, 2529–2540 10.1105/tpc.104.024372 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glazer L., Orion D., Apelbaum S. (1983). Interrelationships between ethylene production, gall formation, and root-knot nematode development in tomato plants infected with Meloidogyne javanica. J. Nematol. 15, 539–544 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glazer L., Orion D., Apelbaum S. (1985). Ethylene production by Meloidogyne spp.-infected plants. J. Nematol. 17, 61–63 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gomez E., Royo J., Guo Y., Thompson R., Hueros G. (2002). Establishment of cereal endosperm expression domains: identification and properties of a maize transfer cell-specific transcription factor, ZmMRP-1. Plant Cell 14, 599–610 10.1105/tpc.010365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goverse A., Overmars H., Engelbertink J., Schots A., Bakker J., Helder J. (2000). Both induction and morphogenesis of cyst nematode feeding cells are mediated by auxin. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 13, 1121–1129 10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.10.1121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grunewald W., Van Noorden G., Van Isterdael G., Beeckman T., Gheysen G., Mathesius U. (2009). Manipulation of auxin transport in plant roots during Rhizobium symbiosis and nematode parasitism. Plant Cell 21, 2553–2562 10.1105/tpc.109.069617 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hofmann J., El Ashry Ael N., Anwar S., Erban A., Kopka J., Grundler F. (2010). Metabolic profiling reveals local and systemic responses of host plants to nematode parasitism. Plant J. 62, 1058–1071 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04217.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hofmann J., Wieczorek K., Blochl A., Grundler F. M. (2007). Sucrose supply to nematode-induced syncytia depends on the apoplastic and symplastic pathways. J. Exp. Bot. 58, 1591–1601 10.1093/jxb/erl285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoth S., Stadler R., Sauer N., Hammes U. Z. (2008). Differential vascularization of nematode-induced feeding sites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 12617–12622 10.1073/pnas.0803835105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hutangura P., Mathesius U., Jones M. G. K., Rolfe B. G. (1999). Auxin induction is a trigger for root gall formation caused by root-knot nematodes in white clover and is associated with the activation of the flavonoid pathway. Funct. Plant Biol. 26, 221–231 10.1071/PP98157 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jones J. T., Furlanetto C., Bakker E., Banks B., Blok V., Chen Q., et al. (2003). Characterization of a chorismate mutase from the potato cyst nematode Globodera pallida. Mol. Plant Pathol. 4, 43–50 10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00140.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones J. T., Furlanetto C., Phillips M. S. (2007). The role of flavonoids produced in response to cyst nematode infection of Arabidopsis thaliana. Nematology 9, 671–677 10.1163/156854107782024875 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jones M. G. K., Dropkin V. H. (1976). Scanning electron microscopy in nematode-induced giant transfer cells. Cytobios 15, 149–161 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones M. G. K., Goto D. B. (2011). Root-knot nematodes and giant cells, in Genomics and Molecular Genetics of Plant–Nematode Interactions, eds Jones J., Gheysen G., Fenoll C. (Dordrecht: Springer; ), 83–102 10.1007/978-94-007-0434-3_5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Karczmarek A., Overmars H., Helder J., Goverse A. (2004). Feeding cell development by cyst and root-knot nematodes involves a similar early, local and transient activation of a specific auxin-inducible promoter element. Mol. Plant Pathol. 5, 343–346 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2004.00230.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kyndt T., Vieira P., Gheysen G., De Almeida-Engler J. (2013). Nematode feeding sites: unique organs in plant roots. Planta 238, 807–818 10.1007/s00425-013-1923-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee C., Chronis D., Kenning C., Peret B., Hewezi T., Davis E. L., et al. (2011). The novel cyst nematode effector protein 19C07 interacts with the Arabidopsis auxin influx transporter LAX3 to control feeding site development. Plant Physiol. 155, 866–880 10.1104/pp.110.167197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lohar D. P., Bird D. M. (2003). Lotus japonicus: a new model to study root-parasitic nematodes. Plant Cell Physiol. 44, 1176–1184 10.1093/pcp/pcg146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakazawa M., Yabe N., Ichikawa T., Yamamoto Y. Y., Yoshizumi T., Hasunuma K., et al. (2001). DFL1, an auxin-responsive GH3 gene homologue, negatively regulates shoot cell elongation and lateral root formation, and positively regulates the light response of hypocotyl length. Plant J. 25, 213–221 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2001.00957.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nemhauser J. L., Hong F., Chory J. (2006). Different plant hormones regulate similar processes through largely nonoverlapping transcriptional responses. Cell 126, 467–475 10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Portillo M., Cabrera J., Lindsey K., Topping J., Andres M. F., Emiliozzi M., et al. (2013). Distinct and conserved transcriptomic changes during nematode-induced giant cell development in tomato compared with Arabidopsis: a functional role for gene repression. New Phytol. 197, 1276–1290 10.1111/nph.12121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sagi M., Fluhr R. (2006). Production of reactive oxygen species by plant NADPH oxidases. Plant Physiol. 141, 336–340 10.1104/pp.106.078089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schaller G. E., Kieber J. J., Shiu S.-H. (2008). Two-component signaling elements and histidyl-aspartyl phosphorelays. Arabidopsis Book 6:e0112 10.1199/tab.0112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schikora A., Schmidt W. (2002). Formation of transfer cells and H(+)-ATPase expression in tomato roots under P and Fe deficiency. Planta 215, 304–311 10.1007/s00425-002-0738-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Siddique S., Sobczak M., Tenhaken R., Grundler F. M. W., Bohlmann H. (2012). Cell wall ingrowths in nematode induced syncytia require UGD2 and UGD3. PLoS ONE 7:e41515 10.1371/journal.pone.0041515 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sobczak M., Golinowski W. (2009). Structure of cyst nematode feeding sites, in Genomics and Molecular Genetics of Plant–Nematode Interactions, eds Jones J., Gheysen G., Fenoll C. (Dordrecht: Springer; ), 153–188 [Google Scholar]
- Sobczak M., Golinowski W. (2011). Cyst nematodes and syncytia, in Genomics and Molecular Genetics of Plant–Nematode Interactions, eds Jones J., Gheysen G., Fenoll C. (Dordrecht: Springer; ), 83–102 [Google Scholar]
- Szakasits D., Heinen P., Wieczorek K., Hofmann J., Wagner F., Kreil D. P., et al. (2009). The transcriptome of syncytia induced by the cyst nematode Heterodera schachtii in Arabidopsis roots. Plant J. 57, 771–784 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03727.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thiel J., Hollmann J., Rutten T., Weber H., Scholz U., Weschke W. (2012b). 454 Transcriptome sequencing suggests a role for two-component signalling in cellularization and differentiation of barley endosperm transfer cells. PLoS ONE 7:e41867 10.1371/journal.pone.0041867 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thiel J., Riewe D., Rutten T., Melzer M., Friedel S., Bollenbeck F., et al. (2012a). Differentiation of endosperm transfer cells of barley: a comprehensive analysis at the micro-scale. Plant J. 71, 639–655 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05018.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thiel J., Weier D., Sreenivasulu N., Strickert M., Weichert N., Melzer M., et al. (2008). Different hormonal regulation of cellular differentiation and function in nucellar projection and endosperm transfer cells: a microdissection-based transcriptome study of young barley grains. Plant Physiol. 148, 1436–1452 10.1104/pp.108.127001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thimm O., Blasing O., Gibon Y., Nagel A., Meyer S., Kruger P., et al. (2004). MAPMAN: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant J. 37, 914–939 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02016.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tucker M. L., Xue P., Yang R. (2010). 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) concentration and ACC synthase expression in soybean roots, root tips, and soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines)-infected roots. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 463–472 10.1093/jxb/erp317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wasson A. P., Ramsay K., Jones M. G., Mathesius U. (2009). Differing requirements for flavonoids during the formation of lateral roots, nodules and root knot nematode galls in Medicago truncatula. New Phytol. 183, 167–179 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02850.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wubben M. J. E., Su H., Rodermel S. R., Baum T. J. (2001). Susceptibility to the sugar beet cyst nematode is modulated by ethylene signal transduction in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 14, 1206–1212 10.1094/MPMI.2001.14.10.1206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xiong Y., Li Q.-B., Kang B.-H., Chourey P. (2011). Discovery of genes expressed in basal endosperm transfer cells in maize using 454 transcriptome sequencing. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 29, 835–847 10.1007/s11105-011-0291-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou Y., Andriunas F., Offler C. E., McCurdy D. W., Patrick J. W. (2010). An epidermal-specific ethylene signal cascade regulates trans-differentiation of transfer cells in Vicia faba cotyledons. New Phytol. 185, 931–943 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03136.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.