Abstract
The inhibition of triosephosphate isomerase (TPI) in glycolysis by the pyruvate kinase (PK) substrate phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) results in a newly discovered feedback loop that counters oxidative stress in cancer and actively respiring cells. The mechanism underlying this inhibition is illuminated by the co-crystal structure of TPI with bound PEP at 1.6 Å resolution, and by mutational studies guided by the crystallographic results. PEP is bound to the catalytic pocket of TPI and occludes substrate, which accounts for the observation that PEP competitively inhibits the interconversion of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate and dihydroxyacetone phosphate. Replacing an isoleucine residue located in the catalytic pocket of TPI with valine or threonine altered binding of substrates and PEP, reducing TPI activity in vitro and in vivo. Confirming a TPI-mediated activation of the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), transgenic yeast cells expressing these TPI mutations accumulate greater levels of PPP intermediates and have altered stress resistance, mimicking the activation of the PK–TPI feedback loop. These results support a model in which glycolytic regulation requires direct catalytic inhibition of TPI by the pyruvate kinase substrate PEP, mediating a protective metabolic self-reconfiguration of central metabolism under conditions of oxidative stress.
Keywords: glycolysis, triosephosphate isomerase, phosphoenolpyruvate, pyruvate kinase, feedback loop
2. Introduction
With the challenge of surviving in a constantly changing environment, cells have evolved mechanisms to flexibly regulate metabolism [1,2]. An important and dynamically regulated metabolic pathway is glycolysis, an ancient chemical route of carbohydrate utilization that produces ATP, NADH and intermediate metabolites for the synthesis of nucleotides, fatty acids and amino acids. Glycolysis is mainly regulated through feedback and feed-forward cycles involving its intermediate metabolites. These cycles sustain intermediates while preventing their accumulation to toxic levels and are responsible for the oscillating behaviour of glycolytic reactions [3–6]. Moreover, this enzymatic regulation is important for maintaining the balance of metabolism during changes in cell growth or environment [1,2]. As an example, the increased need for the redox cofactor NADPH during oxidative stress caused upon hydroperoxide exposure is met by diverting glycolytic flux into the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP). This transition is rapidly inducible by metabolic inhibition of glycolysis, changes in the activity of glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (the first enzyme of the oxidative PPP), followed by transcriptional control during mid- to long-term adaptation to oxidative conditions [7–10].
A similar mechanism acts to prevent an accumulation of oxidizing metabolites in cancer cells or cells that respire at high rates. These frequently possess a higher activity of the PPP to balance the greater demand for NADPH by the anti-oxidant machinery and to compensate for the increased production of reactive oxygen species [11,12]. Current findings have highlighted the importance of the terminal glycolytic enzyme pyruvate kinase (PK) to achieve the regulation of glycolysis and the PPP. Low activity of PK has been found in cancer and rapidly proliferating cells, and in yeast cells with high respiration activity [13,14]. More recently, it has been proposed that cancer cells profit from the loss of the PKM2 gene during tumour formation [15]. Reduced PK activity caused accumulation of its substrate, phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), which correlates with an increased activity of the PPP [14,16], and increased oxidant tolerances of both mammalian and yeast cells [11,14]. It has been observed that PEP is an inhibitor of another metabolic redox regulator, triosephosphate isomerase (TPI or TIM, EC 5.3.1.1) [17,18]. In its glycolytic role, TPI is regarded as a near-perfect catalyst because its catalytic speed in vitro only depends on the rate of diffusion of its substrates [19]. In vivo, TPI interconverts dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate (G3P) to prevent an accumulation of DHAP [19,20]. Reduced activity of TPI in yeast and Caenorhabditis elegans leads to a partial inhibition of glycolysis but is beneficial during oxidative stress, as it increases the concentration of PPP metabolites and stress tolerance in both species [7,21]. We have shown previously that the increased oxidative stress resistance of PK mutants is attributable to TPI as well. In yeast cells expressing mutant TPI with lowered activity, PK failed to increase stress resistance, while a deletion of the first enzyme of the oxidative PPP, glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH, ZWF1), leads to protein and mitochondrial oxidative damage in a PK-dependent manner [14].
To understand how PEP affects TPI activity, we generated a co-crystal structure of the enzyme in complex with PEP at 1.6 Å resolution. We find that PEP directly interacts with TPI by binding into the catalytic pocket of the enzyme and outcompetes the substrates from their binding position. Moreover, the structural data reveal that PEP interacts with the conserved Ile170, a residue which when mutated is associated with TPI deficiency in humans [22], and in yeast affects response to oxidative stress [7,23] and PK function [14]. We use this mutant and others inferred from the crystallographic structure to define the kinetics and stability properties of TPI upon PEP binding. We demonstrate that the in vivo consequence of competitive TPI inhibition is the activation of the PPP and altered stress resistance.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Structure of the triosephosphate isomerase–phosphoenolpyruvate complex
TPI is a ubiquitous enzyme with homologues found throughout all kingdoms of life [20,24] and that in human populations possesses only a minimum of sequence divergence [25]. To study the TPI–PEP interaction, we co-crystallized PEP and rabbit TPI, which differs from human TPI in four non-conserved residues only (electronic supplementary material, figure S1). The structure was solved by molecular replacement and refined at 1.55 Å resolution (table 1). The asymmetric unit contains a homodimer of TPI (figure 1a). Each protomer contains eight α-helices on the outside and eight parallel β-strands on the inside, forming a typical TIM-barrel [26]. Comparison of TPI-PEP with a previously reported structure of rabbit muscle apo TPI [27] shows that the active site loops are in the closed conformation in both subunits. The electron density map gave a clearly defined and unambiguous shape for PEP bound to the active sites of both subunits (figure 1a,c). Active site residues engage PEP and make similar interactions to those observed for the TPI substrate DHAP (figures 1b and 2a,b; a stereoscopic illustration is given in figure 1c) [28]. For substrate conversion, TPI employs a catalytic triad consisting of the residues Lys13, His95 and Glu165 [27], whereas PEP is in contact with the catalytically active residue Lys13 and the active site residues Gly232, Gly233, Gly171, Ser211 and Asn11 (figure 2). The positioning of PEP thus indicates that it binds into the catalytic pocket of TPI and competes with the substrates for binding with catalytic residues (figure 2c).
Table 1.
data collection | |
---|---|
wavelength (Å) | 0.9795 |
resolution (Å) | 43.1–1.55 |
(high-resolution shell) | 1.63–1.55 |
Rmerge | 0.086 (0.314) |
unique reflections | 59 113 |
completeness | 93.4 |
multiplicity | 2.7 |
I/σ(I) | 8.0 |
unit cell (a, b, c (Å); α,β,γ (deg)) |
a = 36.85, b = 72.07, c = 161.20, α = β = γ = 90 |
space group | P212121 |
refinement | |
R (working set) | 0.1665 |
Rfree (test set) | 0.2032 |
RMS deviations | |
bond lengths (Å) | 0.0195 |
bond angles (Å) | 1.9061 |
Ramachandran statistics | |
% of residues in allowed regions |
465 (96.27%) |
% of residues in generously allowed |
14 (2.90%) |
% of residues in not allowed |
4 (0.83%) |
model | |
amino acids TPI | 246 of 250 |
water molecules | 432 |
3.2. Structure–function analysis of the triosephosphate isomerase–phosphoenolpyruvate interaction
We observed that PEP is in direct contact with a conserved isoleucine at position 170. A human TPI allele mutant for this residue (Ile170Val) has been found in a rare variant in the human genetic disorder TPI deficiency. This mutation translates into a mutant TPI with reduced catalytic activity [21,22]. TPI deficiency manifests as recessive autosomal multi-system disorder, which is caused by structural defects in the TPI enzyme [29]. Based on the crystallographic information, we predicted two further residue exchanges to affect PEP binding and generated two constructs encoding for TPILys13Arg as well as TPIIle170Thr. Lys13 is known to be required for the catalytic mechanism [26] and exchanging it to arginine rendered the enzyme not only catalytically inactive but also largely unstable (electronic supplementary material, figure S3; figures 4 and 5). Thus, our analyses shown below focused mostly on the TPIIle170Val and TPIIlel70Thr proteins that retained stability and residual catalytic activity.
3.3. TPIIle170Val and TPIIle170Thr exhibit altered phosphoenolpyruvate and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate binding
We expressed 6x-histidine tagged wild-type human TPI, TPIIle170Val, TPIIle170Thr and TPILys13Arg in Escherichia coli and purified the enzymes using metal affinity chromatography. Far-UV circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy of the purified recombinant enzymes showed a similar composition of secondary structures, indicating that the mutations did not prevent folding (electronic supplementary material, figure S2). To determine the impact of the mutations on the interactions of TPI with PEP and G3P, we conducted thermal melt assays using the fluorescent probe SYPRO Orange [30]. In the presence of incremental PEP concentrations, TPI and its mutants exhibited thermo stabilization, indicating that the proteins bound the metabolite (figure 3a). Interestingly, TPIIle170Val and TPIIle170Thr responded more strongly to the presence of PEP (TPIIle170Val ΔTm = 2.64°C, TPIIle170Thr ΔTm = 2.95°C) in comparison with a ΔTm = 2.57°C for human wild-type TPI, indicating that the mutations increased the binding affinity to PEP (figure 3a).
Next, we assessed structural stability in the presence of the TPI substrate, G3P. This substrate is expected to be constantly metabolized to DHAP (and back) [31,32], and adding up to 3 mM G3P to wild-type TPI caused a slight increase in the enzyme's thermal stability (figure 3b). The effects of G3P addition to TPIIle170Val were comparable with that of the wild-type. A much stronger response was however observed for TPIIle170Thr. This mutant substantially gained stability in the presence of G3P (figure 3b; ΔTm = 6.21°C at 3 mM G3P, wild-type TPI ΔTm = 1.68°C), indicating that the binding affinity to this substrate was increased. We speculate that the increased substrate affinity is facilitated by a hydrogen bond between the substrate and the threonine side chain.
Finally, we tested whether protein stability is affected by PEP in the presence of G3P. In the wild-type form, PEP was competitive with G3P for binding the enzyme, as expressed by an increase in thermal stability even at PEP levels lower than 0.25 mM (figure 3c). Conversely, the increased thermostability mediated by G3P specifically to the TPIIle170Thr enzyme (figure 3b) was partially lost upon adding PEP (figure 3c), confirming competitive binding in this mutant as well. By contrast, TPIIle170Val was resistant to increased PEP levels (figure 3c), indicating that this metabolite was no longer competitive for binding. In summary, thermal shift assays confirmed binding of PEP to TPI. The different behaviour of the TPIIle170Val and TPIIle170Thr mutants in this process supports the crystallographic identification of the binding site to be the catalytic pocket and indicates direct contact of PEP and G3P with this isoleucine residue.
3.4. Inhibitory effects of phosphoenolpyruvate on triosephosphate isomerase catalysis
Next, we performed enzyme-coupled assays to determine changes in the catalytic activity of TPI in the mutants as well as in the presence of PEP. The three mutations affecting residues located in the catalytic pocket, TPIIle170Val, TPIIle170Thr and TPILys13Arg, all reduced the catalytic activity of TPI (figure 4a). The substantial residual activities of 5.9% for TPIIle170Val or 13.1% of TPIIle170Thr indicate that Ile170 is not essential for TPI's catalytic function. By contrast, TPILys13Arg exhibited only catalytic activity around the detection limit of the assay (approx. 0.2% compared with wild-type level), confirming that Lys13 is essential for catalysis, as reported earlier [33].
To quantify enzymatic activity for wild-type TPI, TPIIle170Val and TPIIle170Thr, and to determine the rate of their inhibition by PEP (expressed as Ki, IC50 values), we generated substrate saturation and PEP titration curves for these enzyme species. The mutant enzymes exhibited lower substrate conversion rates and saturated at lower concentrations of G3P (Km for wild-type TPI: 1373 µM, TPIIle170Val: 687 µM and TPIIle170Thr: 303 µM). This indicates that despite its lower activity, the TPIIle170Thr mutant had higher affinity to the TPI substrate (figure 4b, black curves, from left to right). Next, we titrated PEP to the reaction operating at maximal activity. In all cases, a strong and concentration-dependent inhibition of the enzyme activity was observed. In the case of human wild-type TPI, 50% of enzyme activity was lost in the presence of 570 µM PEP (IC50), corresponding to a Ki of 230 µM (figure 4b, blue curves, to be read from right to left). Compared with pharmacological inhibitors, PEP is thus a relatively low-affinity inhibitor for TPI. However, this appears biologically meaningful, as PEP is constantly present at high cellular levels [14]. A high affinity for PEP would thus render TPI constantly inactive.
Finally, we observed that the introduced TPI mutations influenced the PEP sensitivity of TPI. The mutant species exhibited strongly increased IC50 values (TPIIle70Val = 1925 µM, TPIIle170Thr = 1537 µM). This finding supports the crystallographic result that isoleucine 170 interacts with PEP, rendering the mutant enzymes in relative terms more PEP-resistant.
3.5. In vivo complementation of triosephosphate isomerase, TPIIle170Val and TPIIle170Thr
In the next step, we tested whether cells carrying the mutant enzymes were capable of maintaining metabolism. For this, we used a yeast strain (MR100 [21]) chromosomally deleted for yeast TPI1, a direct sequence orthologue of human TPI catalysing the same reaction, and which is kept viable by expressing TPI from a 5'FOA-counterselectable URA3 plasmid. We introduced human TPI, TPIIle170Val, TPIIle170Thr and TPILys13Arg into this strain, then selected on 5'FOA media for cells that had lost the TPI-URA3 plasmid. Yeast strains expressing wild-type TPI, TPIIle170Val and TPIIle170Thr could be cultured in glucose-containing media, indicating that these enzymes compensated for the loss of yeast TPI, demonstrating catalytic activity in vivo. By contrast, yeast cells expressing TPILys13Arg were not viable, confirming that TPILys13Arg was not catalytically functional (figure 5a).
Next, TPI activity was measured in cell extracts of the transgenic strains. As the total TPI substrate conversion per microgram protein in the cell extract corresponded to 1.5% compared to the pure enzyme (15.5 µmol NADH min−1 µg protein−1), we estimate that TPI accounts for approximately 1.5% of total soluble protein, substantiating that TPI is one of the most abundant cytoplasmic proteins [34]. Interestingly, we noted that the total activity of mutant enzymes (TPIIle170Val, TPIIle170Thr) was, relative to wild-type, significantly lower in their purified version compared with what we measured in the cell extracts (figures 4a and 5b). An analysis of TPI expression levels by immunoblotting using a specific TPI antisera [35] however revealed that mutant TPI is much more strongly expressed compared with wild-type TPI (figure 5c). This indicates that cells compensated for a loss of specific TPI activity by the upregulation of the enzyme abundance.
3.6. Low triosephosphate isomerase activity mediates elevation in pentose phosphate pathway metabolite concentrations, oxidant resistance and heat sensitivity
We have shown previously that reduced activity of TPI causes a re-configuration of central metabolism, leading to increased flux of the PPP and increased stress resistance in yeast and C. elegans [7]. The feedback inhibition of TPI by PEP is therefore expected to have similar consequences. In bacteria, yeast and mammalian cells, PEP accumulation is caused by a diminution of PK activity [11,14,16]. Whereas low PK activity in yeast is correlated with high respiration rates and superoxide production [14], in human cells it is associated with rapid cell proliferation and cancer [13,36]. Affected by high ROS production, cancer cells upregulate the allosterically regulated PK isoform PKM2 [37], which is redox-sensitive and the PKM isoform with lower catalytic activity [11,13,36]. Moreover, recent results have demonstrated that cancer cells have higher survival chances when they lose this gene [15]. This situation causes a block of the early steps of glycolysis and increases the PPP activity resulting in augmented oxidant tolerance of both yeast and mammalian cells [11,14], indicating that the PK–TPI feedback loop is important for oxidative stress protection.
As shown above, TPI substrates and PEP bind to the same structural site and have largely the same contact residues. As a consequence, mutations that affect PEP binding also affect the catalytic activity of TPI. This prevents the creation of an ideal in vivo model where TPI feedback inhibition by PEP would be disrupted while TPI catalytic activity is unaffected. However, the mutant proteins provide a means of studying the consequences of specifically lowered TPI activity that mimics the situation of feedback inhibition. We used the yeast strains expressing TPIIle170Val and TPIIle170Thr to determine glycolytic and PPP metabolite concentrations by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), adapting our previous procedures [38,39]. In comparison with the isogenic strain expressing wild-type TPI, yeast cells expressing both the naturally occurring TPIIle170Val allele and the designed TPIIle170Thr protein displayed an increased concentration of PPP intermediates, indicating higher activity of this pathway confirming the previous results (figure 6a; electronic supplementary material, figure S4). Moreover, glycolytic intermediates upstream of TPI were affected, with the strongest measured increase in the concentration of the TPI substrate DHAP (figure 6a), reflecting the partial blockage of glycolysis.
Next, we tested for consequences of expressing the mutant TPI forms in regard to stress resistance. For this, the transgenic strains were rendered prototrophic by transformation with the pHLUM minichromosome [40]. Then, the cells were spotted on media containing the thiol-oxidizing compound diamide, as resistance to this compound has previously been shown to be dependent on PPP activation [7,41], and on media containing hydrogen peroxide, a naturally occurring oxidant. Resistance against both oxidants was increased in cells expressing TPIIle170Val and TPIIle170Thr, with the effects being stronger for diamide (figure 6b). To address whether this phenotype was directly depending on the PPP, a similar set of experiments was then conducted in isogenic strains deleted for the gene encoding glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (ZWF1), the first enzyme of the oxidative PPP that is a direct source of NADPH [42], and SOL3 and SOL4, two paralogous genes which catalyse the next (non-NADP(H)-dependent) step of the pathway [43]. The deletion of ZWF1 (on both oxidants) reduced yeast oxidant tolerances (figure 6b). The deletion of SOL3 and SOL4 caused weaker effects on H2O2 only (figure 6b). In combination with ZWF1, the protective effects of TPIIle170Val and TPIIle170Thr were lost, and this phenotype was affected in combination with SOL3 and SOL4 deletions as well (figure 6b). This indicates that the TPI-mediated oxidant protection is dependent on the oxidative PPP, and mainly on its first NADPH-producing enzyme, the glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase Zwf1p.
Yeast strains with low PK activity are resistant to oxidants [14] but sensitive to heat [44]. Therefore, we tested whether a similar behaviour was observed in the TPI mutant strains. Exponentially growing yeast strains were exposed to 50°C for five minutes or kept at 30°C and used to inoculate a fresh culture. The heat-induced growth delay, calculated using a model free spline fit [45], was used as a measure of yeast heat resistance. Yeast cells expressing human TPI well tolerated the heat treatment; however, yeast harbouring TPIIle170Val and TPIIle170Thr were heat-sensitive, resulting in a strong delay until growth resumed (figure 6c). Thus, low TPI activity, despite protecting against oxidants, causes heat sensitivity. In summary, similar to what has been observed in cells with low PK activity [14,44], expressing TPIIle170Val and TPIIle170Thr increased PPP metabolite concentrations and mediated oxidant resistance and heat sensitivity.
4. Conclusion
The central glycolytic enzyme TPI plays a crucial role in coordinating energy with redox metabolism during stress response and in cancer. Being the target of a feedback loop initiated by the pyruvate kinase substrate PEP, dynamic TPI inhibition distributes metabolites between glycolysis and the PPP [7,14]. Here we present a TPI–PEP co-crystal structure, demonstrating that PEP directly binds into the catalytic pocket of TPI. In structure–function studies involving different TPI point mutations including a rare natural variant (TPIIle170Val [22]), and two mutants designed on the basis of the crystallographic findings (TPILys13Arg and TPIIle170Thr), we have demonstrated that PEP functions as a competitive TPI inhibitor, being able to interfere with the enzymatic TPI function during catalysis. Finally, studies with transgenic yeast cells expressing these human TPI mutants revealed that low TPI activity increases PPP metabolite concentrations, increased oxidant resistance and decreased heat tolerance. Hence, the PYK–TPI feedback loop, leading to the regulation of glycolysis and the PPP to adapt to oxidative stress conditions, is the consequence of active-site competitive TPI inhibition by the PK substrate PEP.
5. Material and methods
Recombinant TPI expression, enzyme purification, Western blotting, yeast cultivation and strain generation were conducted according to standard procedures and are described in the electronic supplementary material. The plasmids generated in this study have been deposited at Addgene (http://www.addgene.org) and are listed in table 2.
Table 2.
plasmid name | encoded protein | application | addgene # |
---|---|---|---|
p413GPD-hTPI | human wild-type TPI1 | expression in S. cerevisiae (HIS3, cen) | 50719 |
p413GPD-hTPI Ile170Val | human TPI1 Ile170Val | expression in S. cerevisiae (HIS3, cen) | 50720 |
p413GPD-hTPI Ile170Thr | human TPI1 Ile170Thr | expression in S. cerevisiae (HIS3, cen) | 50721 |
p413GPD-hTPI Lys13Arg | human TPI1 Lys13Arg | expression in S. cerevisiae (HIS3, cen) | 50722 |
pET20b-hTPI | human wild-type TPI1 | expression and purification in E. coli | 50723 |
pET20b-hTPI Ile170Val | human TPI1 Ile170Val | expression and purification in E. coli | 50724 |
pET20b-hTPI Ile170Thr | human TPI1 Ile170Thr | expression and purification in E. coli | 50725 |
pET20b-hTPI Lys13Arg | human TPI1 Lys13Arg | expression and purification in E. coli | 50726 |
5.1. Crystallization of triosephosphate isomerase–phosphoenolpyruvate complex
Native rabbit muscle TPI (TPI, Sigma) was buffer exchanged into crystallization buffer (20 mM Tris pH: 7.0, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2) with a HiTrap Desalting column and concentrated to 10 mg ml−1 with a VIVA spin 2 ml concentrator (MWCO: 10 kDa). PEP was added to the TPI solution to a final concentration of 5 mM. Crystals were grown at 20°C using the sitting-droplet vapour diffusion method by mixing 200 nl of TPI–PEP complex with 200 nl of reservoir solution (0.1 M MES pH: 6.5, 25% polyethylene glycol (PEG) 8000). Crystals appeared 1 day after setting up the crystallization trial and reached the final size in 1 week. The crystals were transferred briefly into reservoir solution supplemented with 25% v/v PEG 400 as cryoprotectant before flash freezing in liquid nitrogen.
5.2. Data collection, structure determination and refinement
X-ray diffraction data were collected at 100 K from cryoprotected crystals at beamline I24 at the Diamond Light Source. A complete dataset of TPI–PEP crystal was collected to a resolution of 1.55 Å. The data were processed and scaled using iMOSFLM and SCALA [46,47], respectively. Molecular replacement was performed with the CCP4 suite program Phaser [48] using the rabbit muscle apo TPI (PDB ID: 1R2R) [27] as the search model. The map identified PEP in the active site, and the initial model (without ligand) was refined using Refmac5 [49]. One protomer was manually adjusted into the electron density map using Coot and directly placed in the second protomer based on non-crystallographic symmetry. The model was refined again with TLS, NCS (non-crystallographic symmetry) and restrained refinement using Refmac5. PEP was finally built into the electron density map and then refined. A summary of the crystallographic data and refinement are given in table 1. Figures were generated using PYMOL.
5.3. Circular dichroism
Recordings of the far-ultraviolet (UV) CD spectrum were used to verify the native conformation of the purified TPI enzyme species. The TPI proteins were diluted to a final concentration of approximately 3.7 mM in 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5). CD recordings were performed at 25°C on a Jobin Yvon CD6 Dichrograph, as described previously [50]. Three scans were averaged and base line subtracted using the software provided by the Jobin Yvon CD6 Dichrograph manufacturer.
5.4. Enzyme activity assays
TPI activity was determined as described previously [21,51]. In brief, activity of TPI in cell-free protein extracts of transgenic yeast expressing human TPI, or with purified human TPI recombinantely expressed in E. coli, was determined in an enzyme-coupled reaction with glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Optical density measurements at 340 nm were used to detect NADH to NAD+ oxidation upon adding the TPI substrate glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate and recorded in 12 s intervals in a spectrophotometer (Amersham US 2000). Km and Ki values were determined by generating saturation curves with G3P and PEP, respectively.
5.5. Thermal shift assays
The detection of protein thermal unfolding was performed in 96-well plates on an iQ5 real-time PCR cycler (BioRad). The reaction mix of 100 ml 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5) contained approximately 4.5 mM protein, 0.4 ml 500× SYPRO Orange (Sigma Aldrich) and PEP and/or G3P at the indicated concentrations. Thermal unfolding of the proteins was monitored by increasing the temperature from 25 to 95°C in 2°C min–1 steps. Measurements were taken every 0.5°C. The resulting curves were each fitted with a four-parameter log-logistic function and protein melt points (inflection points) were calculated using R v. 2.14.1 and the drc package v. 2.3-0. The protein melt points for each ligand concentration were plotted against the melt temperature and fitted with equation (5.1).
5.1 |
5.6. Oxidant-tolerance tests and growth curves
Oxidant tolerance tests were performed as described earlier [7] and growth was monitored after 2–3 days of incubation at 30°C. For growth curves, overnight cultures of the indicated yeast strains were diluted to an OD600 = 0.2 in SC−His media. Aliquots of the same cultures were incubated for 5 min at the indicated temperatures. Immediately after the heat shock, the cells were transferred to a 96-well plate and growth was monitored in a FLUOstar OPTIMA (BMG Labtech) plate reader for 25 h.
5.7. Sample extraction for metabolomics
Sugar phosphate intermediates were quantified with a procedure adapted from our earlier work [38,52]. Briefly, 7.5 OD units of cell suspension were sampled in log phase at an OD600 1.5 ± 0.05 by rapid cold methanol quenching [53] and then lysed in 200 µl organic extraction buffer (75 : 25 acetonitrile : water, 0.2% formic acid) by three repeated FastPrep-24 (MP Biomedicals) cycles for 20 s at 6.5 m s−1. The second extraction cycle was performed with 200 µl and UPLC-grade water. Supernatants from both extraction steps were combined and the solvent was evaporated in a SpeedVac concentrator. The dry pellets were resuspended in 100 µl 7% acetonitrile, centrifuged and metabolite concentrations were quantified by subsequent LC-MS/MS analysis.
5.8. LC-MS/MS measurements
Samples were subjected to LC separation (Agilent 1290) on a C8 column (Zorbax SB-C8 Rapid Resolution HD, 2.1 × 100 mm, 1.8 µm, Agilent; column temperature: 20°C, injection volume: 1 µl). Separation was achieved by isocratic flow at 12% acetonitrile for 3.5 min followed by a gradient to 38% acetonitrile within 2.5 min. With an additional washing step (42% acetonitrile, 0.5 min) and re-equilibration to starting conditions, this resulted in a total cycle time of 7.5 min. All buffers contained 750 mg l−1 octylammoniumacetate as ion pairing reagent. An online coupled triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Agilent 6460) operating in SRM mode was used for quantification. Individual metabolites were identified by matching retention time and fragmentation pattern with commercially available standards. SRM transitions, ionization and fragmentation energies were optimized for each compound (electronic supplementary material, table S2). Ion source settings are listed in the electronic supplementary material, table S3. Data analysis was done in the Masshunter Workstation software package (Agilent). External calibration curves were measured repeatedly and used to determine absolute concentrations.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank our laboratory members for critically reading and discussing the manuscript and Dr Katherine Stott (University of Cambridge, UK) for technical support. M.R. is a Wellcome Trust Research Career Development and Wellcome-Beit prize fellow.
Data accessibility
The coordinates of the PEP-bound TPI crystallographic structure have been deposited with the PDB with code 4OWG.
Funding statement
We acknowledge funding from the Wellcome Trust (RG 093735/Z/10/Z) and the ERC (Starting grant 260809) to M.R. M.A.K. is supported by an Erwin Schrödinger postdoctoral fellowship (J 3341) from the FWF (Austria). B.F.L. and D.D. are supported by the Wellcome Trust.
References
- 1.Buescher JM, et al. 2012. Global network reorganization during dynamic adaptations of Bacillus subtilis metabolism. Science 335, 1099–1103. (doi:10.1126/science.1206871) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Grüning N-MM, Lehrach H, Ralser M. 2010. Regulatory crosstalk of the metabolic network. Trends Biochem. Sci. 35, 220–227. (doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2009.12.001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cornish-Bowden A, et al. 2013. A model of yeast glycolysis based on a consistent kinetic characterisation of all its enzymes. FEBS Lett. 587, 2832–2841. (doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2013.06.043) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Daran-Lapujade P, et al. 2007. The fluxes through glycolytic enzymes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are predominantly regulated at posttranscriptional levels. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 15 753–15 758. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0707476104) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Teusink B, et al. 2000. Can yeast glycolysis be understood in terms of in vitro kinetics of the constituent enzymes? Testing biochemistry. Eur. J. Biochem. 267, 5313–5329. (doi:10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01527.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Markus M, Kuschmitz D, Hess B. 1985. Properties of strange attractors in yeast glycolysis. Biophys. Chem. 22, 95–105. (doi:10.1016/0301-4622(85)80030-2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ralser M, et al. 2007. Dynamic rerouting of the carbohydrate flux is key to counteracting oxidative stress. J. Biol. 6, 10 (doi:10.1186/jbiol61) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chechik G, Oh E, Rando O, Weissman J, Regev A, Koller D. 2008. Activity motifs reveal principles of timing in transcriptional control of the yeast metabolic network. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1251–1259. (doi:10.1038/nbt.1499) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Godon C, Lagniel G, Lee J, Buhler JM, Kieffer S, Perrot M, Boucherie H, Toledano MB, Labarre J. 1998. The H2O2 stimulon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 22 480–22 489. (doi:10.1074/jbc.273.35.22480) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cosentino C, Grieco D, Costanzo V. 2011. ATM activates the pentose phosphate pathway promoting anti-oxidant defence and DNA repair. Embo J. 30, 546–555. (doi:10.1038/emboj.2010.330) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Anastasiou D, et al. 2011. Inhibition of pyruvate kinase M2 by reactive oxygen species contributes to cellular antioxidant responses. Science 334, 1278–1283. (doi:10.1126/science.1211485) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gottlieb E, Vousden KH. 2010. p53 regulation of metabolic pathways. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2, a001040 (doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a001040) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Christofk HR, Vander Heiden MG, Harris MH, Ramanathan A, Gerszten RE, Wei R, Fleming MD, Schreiber SL, Cantley LC. 2008. The M2 splice isoform of pyruvate kinase is important for cancer metabolism and tumour growth. Nature 452, 230–233. (doi:10.1038/nature06734) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gruning NM, et al. 2011. Pyruvate kinase triggers a metabolic feedback loop that controls redox metabolism in respiring cells. Cell Metab. 14, 415–427. (doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2011.06.017) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Israelsen WJ, et al. 2013. PKM2 isoform-specific deletion reveals a differential requirement for pyruvate kinase in tumor cells. Cell 155, 397–409. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.025) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Emmerling M, Dauner M, Ponti A, Fiaux J, Hochuli M, Szyperski T, Wuthrich K, Bailey JE, Sauer U. 2002. Metabolic flux responses to pyruvate kinase knockout in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 184, 152–164. (doi:10.1128/JB.184.1.152-164.2002) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fenton AW, Reinhart GD. 2009. Disentangling the web of allosteric communication in a homotetramer: heterotropic inhibition in phosphofructokinase from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 48, 12 323–12 328. (doi:10.1021/bi901456p) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lambeir A-M, Opperdoes FR, Wierenga RK. 1987. Kinetic properties of triose-phosphate isomerase from Trypanosoma brucei brucei. A comparison with the rabbit muscle and yeast enzymes. Eur. J. Biochem. 168, 69–74. (doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1987.tb13388.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Blacklow SC, Raines RT, Lim WA, Zamore PD, Knowles JR. 1988. Triosephosphate isomerase catalysis is diffusion controlled. Appendix: analysis of triose phosphate equilibria in aqueous solution by 31P NMR. Biochemistry 27, 1158–1167. (doi:10.1021/bi00404a013) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wierenga RK, Kapetaniou EG, Venkatesan R. 2010. Triosephosphate isomerase: a highly evolved biocatalyst. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 67, 3961–3982. (doi:10.1007/s00018-010-0473-9) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ralser M, Heeren G, Breitenbach M, Lehrach H, Krobitsch S. 2006. Triose phosphate isomerase deficiency is caused by altered dimerization-not catalytic inactivity-of the mutant enzymes. PLoS ONE 1, e30 (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000030) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Arya R, Lalloz MR, Bellingham AJ, Layton DM. 1997. Evidence for founder effect of the Glu104Asp substitution and identification of new mutations in triosephosphate isomerase deficiency. Hum. Mutat. 10, 290–294. (doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(1997)10:4<290::AID-HUMU4>3.0.CO;2-L) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kruger A, et al. 2011. The pentose phosphate pathway is a metabolic redox sensor and regulates transcription during the antioxidant response. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 15, 311–324. (doi:10.1089/ars.2010.3797) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Joseph-McCarthy D, Lolis E, Komives EA, Petsko GA. 1994. Crystal structure of the K12M/G15A triosephosphate isomerase double mutant and electrostatic analysis of the active site. Biochemistry 33, 2815–2823. (doi:10.1021/bi00176a010) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ralser M, Nebel A, Kleindorp R, Krobitsch S, Lehrach H, Schreiber S, Reinhardt R, Timmermann B. 2008. Sequencing and genotypic analysis of the triosephosphate isomerase (TPI1) locus in a large sample of long-lived Germans. BMC Genet. 9, 38 (doi:10.1186/1471-2156-9-38) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Banner DW, et al. 1975. Structure of chicken muscle triose phosphate isomerase determined crystallographically at 2.5 angstrom resolution using amino acid sequence data. Nature 255, 609–614. (doi:10.1038/255609a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Aparicio R, Ferreira ST, Polikarpov I. 2003. Closed conformation of the active site loop of rabbit muscle triosephosphate isomerase in the absence of substrate: evidence of conformational heterogeneity. J. Mol. Biol. 334, 1023–1041. (doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2003.10.022) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jogl G, Rozovsky S, McDermott AE, Tong L. 2003. Optimal alignment for enzymatic proton transfer: structure of the Michaelis complex of triosephosphate isomerase at 1.2-Å resolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 50–55. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0233793100) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Schneider AS. 2000. Triosephosphate isomerase deficiency: historical perspectives and molecular aspects. Baillieres Best Pr. Res. Clin. Haematol. 13, 119–140. (doi:10.1053/beha.2000.0061) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lo M-C, Aulabaugh A, Jin G, Cowling R, Bard J, Malamas M, Ellestad G. 2004. Evaluation of fluorescence-based thermal shift assays for hit identification in drug discovery. Anal. Biochem. 332, 153–159. (doi:10.1016/j.ab.2004.04.031) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Albery WJ, Knowles JR. 1976. Free-energy profile of the reaction catalyzed by triosephosphate isomerase. Biochemistry 15, 5627–5631. (doi:10.1021/bi00670a031) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Reynolds SJ, Yates DW, Pogson CI. 1971. Dihydroxyacetone phosphate: its structure and reactivity with glycerophosphate dehydrogenase, aldolase and triose phosphate isomerase and some possible metabolic implications. Biochem. J. 122, 285–297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lodi PJ, Chang LC, Knowles JR, Komives EA. 1994. Triosephosphate isomerase requires a positively charged active site: the role of lysine-12. Biochemistry 33, 2809–2814. (doi:10.1021/bi00176a009) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Picotti P, Bodenmiller B, Mueller LN, Domon B, Aebersold R. 2009. Full dynamic range proteome analysis of S. cerevisiae by targeted proteomics. Cell 138, 795–806. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.051) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yamaji R, Fujita K, Nakanishi I, Nagao K, Naito M, Tsuruo T, Inui H, Nakano Y. 2004. Hypoxic up-regulation of triosephosphate isomerase expression in mouse brain capillary endothelial cells. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 423, 332–342. (doi:10.1016/j.abb.2004.01.003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Morgan HP, O'Reilly FJ, Wear MA, O'Neill JR, Fothergill-Gilmore LA, Hupp T, Walkinshaw MD. 2013. M2 pyruvate kinase provides a mechanism for nutrient sensing and regulation of cell proliferation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 5881–5886. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1217157110) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bluemlein K, Gruning NM, Feichtinger RG, Lehrach H, Kofler B, Ralser M, Grüning N-M. 2011. No evidence for a shift in pyruvate kinase PKM1 to PKM2 expression during tumorigenesis. Oncotarget 2, 393–400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wamelink M, Jansen E, Struys E, Lehrach H, Jakobs C, Ralser M. 2009. Quantification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae pentose-phosphate pathway intermediates by LC-MS/MS. Nat. Protoc. Netw. See http://www.nature.com/protocolexchange/protocols/560. (doi:10.1038/nprot.2009.140) [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wamelink MM, Smith DE, Jakobs C, Verhoeven NM. 2005. Analysis of polyols in urine by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: a useful tool for recognition of inborn errors affecting polyol metabolism. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 28, 951–963. (doi:10.1007/s10545-005-0233-4) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mulleder M, Capuano F, Pir P, Christen S, Sauer U, Oliver SG, Ralser M. 2012. A prototrophic deletion mutant collection for yeast metabolomics and systems biology. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 1176–1178. (doi:10.1038/nbt.2442) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Shenton D, Grant CM. 2003. Protein S-thiolation targets glycolysis and protein synthesis in response to oxidative stress in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem. J. 374, 513–519. (doi:10.1042/BJ20030414) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nogae I, Johnston M. 1990. Isolation and characterization of the ZWF1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, encoding glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. Gene 96, 161–169. (doi:10.1016/0378-1119(90)90248-P) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Stanford DR, Whitney ML, Hurto RL, Eisaman DM, Shen WC, Hopper AK. 2004. Division of labor among the yeast Sol proteins implicated in tRNA nuclear export and carbohydrate metabolism. Genetics 168, 117–127. (doi:10.1534/genetics.104.030452) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Benjaphokee S, Koedrith P, Auesukaree C, Asvarak T, Sugiyama M, Kaneko Y, Boonchird C, Harashima S. 2012. CDC19 encoding pyruvate kinase is important for high-temperature tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. New Biotechnol. 29, 166–176. (doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2011.03.007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kahm M, Hasenbrink G, Lichtenberg-Fraté H, Ludwig J, Kschischo M. 2010. grofit: fitting biological growth curves with R. J. Stat. Softw.33. See http://www.jstatsoft.org/v33/i07. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Battye TGG, Kontogiannis L, Johnson O, Powell HR, Leslie AGW. 2011. iMOSFLM: a new graphical interface for diffraction-image processing with MOSFLM. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 271–281. (doi:10.1107/S0907444910048675) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Winn MD, et al. 2011. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 235–242. (doi:10.1107/S0907444910045749) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.McCoy AJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Adams PD, Winn MD, Storoni LC, Read RJ. 2007. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674. (doi:10.1107/S0021889807021206) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Murshudov GN, Skubák P, Lebedev AA, Pannu NS, Steiner RA, Nicholls RA, Winn MD, Long F, Vagin AA. 2011. REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 355–367. (doi:10.1107/S0907444911001314) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Assenberg R, Webb M, Connolly E, Stott K, Watson M, Hobbs J, Thomas JO. 2008. A critical role in structure-specific DNA binding for the acetylatable lysine residues in HMGB1. Biochem. J. 411, 553–561. (doi:10.1042/BJ20071613) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Maitra PK, Lobo Z. 1971. A kinetic study of glycolytic enzyme synthesis in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 246, 475–488. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wamelink MMC, Struys EA, Huck JHJ, Roos B, van der Knaap MS, Jakobs C, Verhoeven NM. 2005. Quantification of sugar phosphate intermediates of the pentose phosphate pathway by LC-MS/MS: application to two new inherited defects of metabolism. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 823, 18–25. (doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.01.001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.De Koning W, van Dam K. 1992. A method for the determination of changes of glycolytic metabolites in yeast on a subsecond time scale using extraction at neutral pH. Anal. Biochem. 204, 118–123. (doi:10.1016/0003-2697(92)90149-2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The coordinates of the PEP-bound TPI crystallographic structure have been deposited with the PDB with code 4OWG.