Abstract
In eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells, F-ATP synthases provide energy through the synthesis of ATP. The chloroplast F-ATP synthase (CF1FO-ATP synthase) of plants is integrated into the thylakoid membrane via its FO-domain subunits a, b, b’ and c. Subunit c with a stoichiometry of 14 and subunit a form the gate for H+-pumping, enabling the coupling of electrochemical energy with ATP synthesis in the F1 sector.
Here we report the crystallization and structure determination of the c14-ring of subunit c of the CF1FO-ATP synthase from spinach chloroplasts. The crystals belonged to space group C2, with unit-cell parameters a=144.420, b=99.295, c=123.51 Å, and β=104.34° and diffracted to 4.5 Å resolution. Each c-ring contains 14 monomers in the asymmetric unit. The length of the c-ring is 60.32 Å, with an outer ring diameter 52.30 Å and an inner ring width of 40 Å.
Keywords: CF1FO-ATP synthase, c-rotor, crystallization, F-ATP synthase, spinach chloroplast
Abbreviations: BN, blue native; CCP4, Collaborative Computational Project No. 4; DCCD, dicyclohexylcarbodiimid; DDM, n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside; PDB, Protein Data Bank; SLS, Swiss Light Source; TM, transmembrane
INTRODUCTION
The F1FO-ATP synthase is a membrane-bound multisubunit complex consisting of two rotary motors in the FO and F1 sectors, respectively. The membrane-bound proton translocating ATP synthase of chloroplasts, CF1FO catalyses ATP synthesis and ATP hydrolysis coupled to proton translocation across the FO sector. The chloroplast F1 domain consists of the subunits α3β3γδε [1] and the membrane-integrated CFO, is made up of the subunits a, b, b’ and c-ring rotor subunits, which are often named subunit IV, I, II and III, respectively [2,3]. The subcomplex α3β3 forms a hexamer with a central cavity that allows for the penetration of the γ rotor shaft [4]. Subunits γ and ε form the soluble part of the rotor shaft, called the central stalk [5]. Rotation of the central stalk subunit γ within the α3β3 cavity causes conformational changes in the three catalytic sites located at the α–β interfaces leading to ATP synthesis [6]. The two parts of ATP synthases are connected by two stalks, i.e. one central rotating shaft formed by the subunits γ and ε and a thin stalk at the periphery, composed of the subunits b, b’ and δ holding together the F1- and FO portions [5].
Subunits a and c are involved in the process of proton-pumping, thereby coupling the events of ATP synthesis and -hydrolysis in the α3β3-hexamer of F1. A total of ten copies of subunit c in yeast F-ATP synthase are found to associate into a ring structure that interacts with the foot of the central stalk subunits in the intact enzyme [7]. The copy number of c subunits in the ring has been experimentally studied in different organisms and is found to vary from 8 to 15 among bacterial, yeast, plant and mammalian ATP synthases [2,7–14].
The number of subunits and therefore the diameter of the proton turbine seem to be species dependent [7,8]. Atomic Force Microscopy studies, done by Seelert et al. [2] showed that the protein turbine in FO of chloroplast ATP synthase has an asymmetric cylindrical structure with 14 symmetrically distributed subunits, which protrude from both membrane surfaces. Here a new protocol has been developed to obtain crystals of the c-ring of the spinach chloroplast F-ATP synthase, starting from the intact and active enzyme, which diffracted X-rays to 4.5 Å resolution. The crystallographic structure shows that each of the fourteen c subunits folds into a hairpin of two TM (transmembrane) helices, connected by a short partially structured loop. The presented c14-ring structure is discussed from the perspective of bioenergetic costs in plants.
EXPERIMENTAL
Isolation of enzymatically active chloroplast F-ATP synthase
Chloroplast ATP synthase was isolated from spinach (Spinacea oleracea L.) following the procedure described by Pick and Racker [15] with slight modifications as described in [16]. Thylakoid membranes were solubilized using the detergents sodium cholate (23 mM) and octyl-β-D-glucopyranoside (40 mM). For removal of contaminating proteins and lipids, the ATP synthase was subjected to fractionated ammonium sulfate precipitation and sucrose density gradient centrifugation (containing 1 mg/ml asolectin and 8 mM DDM (n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside), to stabilize the protein). Thereafter, the enzyme was purified by dye-ligand chromatography with reactive red 120 [16].
Electrophoresis
BN (blue-native)-PAGE was performed using a Hoefer Mighty Small II SE 250 system (small gel: 10 cm×8 cm×0.15 cm) as described [17,18]. The stacking gel had an acrylamide concentration of 3% and the separating gel an acrylamide gradient from 3.5 to 16%. Approximately 30 μg of solubilized purified CF1FO-ATP synthase in DDM was loaded per lane. A high molecular weight native marker (GE Healthcare) served as mass standard.
After electrophoresis the gel was scanned to document the bands stained by BN-PAGE. Subsequently, ATPase activity of the CF1FO-ATP synthase was determined by incubating the gel in buffer A1 containing 35 mM Tris, 270 mM glycine, 14 mM MgSO4, 0.2% (w/v) Pb(NO3)2, 8 mM ATP, pH 7.8 at 37°C for several hours [19,20]. The white lead phosphate precipitate was documented with a CCD-Imaging System (LAS 3000 intelligent dark box, Fujifilm).
SDS–PAGE was performed according to Laemmli [21], with a stacking gel of 3% and separating gel of 14%. In order to maintain integrity of the subunit c oligomer, protein samples were incubated at room temperature (25°C) in SDS loading buffer for 10 min. For visualization of protein bands, the gel was stained with Coomassie R-250.
Measurement of ATP synthesis
To measure the ATP synthesis activity driven by an electrochemical proton gradient, reconstitution of solubilized ATP synthase into liposomes (phosphatidyl choline/phosphatidic acid, 9:1, w/w) was performed as previously described [20]. As a reference, CF1FO-ATP synthase was inhibited by adding DCCD (dicyclohexylcarbodiimid, 50 μM) before reconstitution into liposomes and incubation for 30 min at room temperature [22].
ATP synthesis activity of the CF1FO-ATP synthase was measured according to Fischer et al. [23] and Poetsch et al. [24] with slight modifications. 240 μl buffer L2 (200 mM Tricin, 5 mM sodium dihydrogenphosphate, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 120 mM KCl, 0.2 mM ADP, pH 8.3) was added into a clinicon-cuvette and mixed with 12.5 μl Luciferin–Luciferase-reagent (ATP-Monitoring Kit; Thermo Labsystems). The cuvette was placed into a Luminometer (BioOrbit 1250) and the baseline was recorded.
Approximately 43 μl of proteoliposomes were equilibrated with 217 μl buffer L1 (20 mM sodium succinate, 5 mM sodium dihydrogenphosphate, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.6 mM KCl, 1 μM Valinomycin, pH 4.7). After 100 s, the mixture was injected via a cannula into the cuvette containing L2. ATP synthesis, driven by the established TM electrochemical gradient (ΔpH and ΔK+), was monitored as luminescence applying the Luciferin–Luciferase-Assay. For calibrating the luminescence signal, 20 μl of 10 μM ATP was added.
Crystallization trials of CF1FO-ATP synthase from spinach chloroplast
Initial screens of the entire CF1FO-ATP synthase at a concentration of 18 mg/ml were set up using the Memplus screen from Molecular Dimensions, UK, using the vapour diffusion method. In several drops, phase separation was observed and systematic variations of pH, precipitant and protein concentration were done to promote nucleation. Crystals grew out of the phase and took approximately 2 months to appear under optimized conditions and cryo freezed in 50% (v/v) mineral oil and paratone. Crystals were analysed at the Swiss Light Source and diffracted to 4.5 Å.
Data collection
A single wavelength dataset of the CF1FO crystal was collected at the protein crystallography beamline S06 PX at the SLS (Swiss Light Source) with a PILATUS 6M detector. Data were collected as a series of 0.2° oscillation images with 10 s exposure time and a detector distance of 500 mm. All diffraction data were indexed, integrated using the iMosflm program [25] and reduced with SCALA [26] and CTRUNCATE [27]. The results of data processing and data statistics are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Data collection.
Statistics of crystallographic data collection | |
---|---|
Wavelength (Å) | 1.00 |
Space group | C2 |
Unit cell | a=144.420, b=99.295, c=123.51Å |
β=104.34° | |
Resolution range (Å) | 30–6.0 (6.32-6.0) |
No. of unique reflections | 4238 |
Total no. of reflections | 12041 |
Multiplicity | 2.8 (2.8) |
Completeness (%) | 97.6 (98.37) |
I/sigma | 9.6 (5.3) |
Rmerge* | 0.049 (0.106) |
Mosaicity | 0.82 |
*Rmerge=ΣΣi|Ih–Ihi|/ΣΣi Ih, where Ih is the mean intensity for reflection h.
Structure solution and refinement
The structure of the c-rotor of CF1FO-ATP synthase was determined by molecular replacement using the coordinates of the c-rotor of the proton-translocating chloroplast ATP synthase [12] [PDB (Protein Data Bank) code 2W5J]. Only the main chain atoms of the model were used for structure solution. Molecular replacement was performed using the PHASER program (TFZ=11.7, LLG score=963, [28]). Since anisotropy was observed in the data, they were subjected to ellipsoidal truncation and anisotropic scaling using the program SCALEIT, which is integrated in CCP4 (Collaborative Computational Project No. 4) [29]. Diffraction anisotropy was evidenced as a directional dependence in diffraction quality. The crystal diffracted to 4.5 Å in the horizontal direction and to 6.0 Å in the vertical direction. This kind of anisotropy is attributed to whole-body anisotropic vibration of unit cells, resulting in the crystal packing interactions being more uniform in one direction than in the other. Therefore, the R-factors were stalled at one stage during refinement and hence the data resolution was truncated at 6.0 Å. The model was manually corrected in COOT [30] and refined in REFMAC [31]. Many cycles of model building and restrained refinement with tight geometric restraints were carried using overall temperature factor and NCS (non-crystallographic symmetry) restraints. Density modification was carried out by DM in the CCP4 suite. ProSMART (Procrustes Structural Matching Alignment and Restraint Tool) was used for generation of external restraints for the refinement [32]. The PDB ID 2W5J was used as reference for exercising this restraint. In the final REFMAC cycles, TLS (translation, libration, screw) procedure was applied. The structure was validated using PROCHECK [33]. All the figures were drawn using PYMOL [34]. Structural comparison analysis are carried out using the SUPERPOSE program [35]. The atomic coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the PDB (ID: 4MJN).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Biochemical characterization of the entire CF1FO-ATP synthase
The complete chloroplast F1FO-ATP synthase from spinach, used for crystallization, was characterized by different methods. The enzyme showed high purity as revealed by SDS–PAGE (Figure 1A) and BN-PAGE (1B). In the SDS gel, the bands of all subunits were present and subunit c (III) migrated as an intact oligomer (Figure 1B). Besides purity, the BN gel demonstrated the presence of predominantly intact CF1FO-ATP synthase (mass of>500 kDa in Figure 1B). Only a small proportion of unbound CF1 is present, but no CFO. These indicate that the crystallized c14-cylinder emerged from the intact enzyme. Additionally, the in-gel assay of ATP hydrolysis demonstrates the preservation of the enzymatic activity of the isolated ATP synthase preparation (results not shown). Since ATP hydrolysis in intact chloroplast ATP synthases is strictly regulated by the subunits ε and γ and other effectors [20], this activity assay can only provide a first indication of functional integrity. Therefore ATP synthesis activity of the CF1FO-ATP synthase was examined (Figure 1C). This was achieved by reconstitution of the entire CF1FO-ATP synthase into liposomes and application of an electrochemical proton gradient. With this method, an ATP synthesis activity of 41±4 ATP per enzyme per second was determined.
Crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis
The enzymatically active and entire CF1FO-ATP synthase was used for crystallization and crystals of good diffraction quality appeared from the optimized phase separated drop under conditions of 33% (v/v) PEG 550 MME, 0.05 M sodium acetate pH 4.3 (Figure 1D). The crystals were colourless, in contrast to recently obtained yellow crystals, which were described to contain one chlorophyll and two carotenoids [3]. However, no protein structure from this crystal form has yet been described [3].
The crystals obtained diffracted to 4.5 Å resolution and belonged to C2 space group (β=104.34°), with unit-cell parameters a=144.42, b=99.29, and c=123.51 Å. The phases were obtained using the crystal structure of the c14 rotor ring of the chloroplast F-ATP synthase (PDB ID 2W5J [12]. The solvent content was calculated to be 63.45% and Vm was 3.36 Å3 per Da [36].
Analysis of the data as well as the solution from molecular replacement confirmed that only the c-ring rotor of the chloroplast ATP synthase is present in the crystal structure, whereas all the F1 subunits α, β, γ, δ and ε and subunits a, b and b’ of the membrane-integral FO domain are lost during the crystallization process. The initial electron density map also suggests that most probably only the c-ring is present in the crystal structure.
Overall structure of the c-rotor
The structure of the c-rotor of the spinach chloroplast F-ATP synthase was determined by the molecular replacement method and refined to 6.0 Å. A summary of the refinement statistics is given in Table 2. Analysis of the stereochemical quality of the final model by PROCHECK has identified that 97% of all the residues are within the core regions of the Ramachandran plot, 2.1% are within the allowed regions, and 0.9% are within the generously allowed region. No residues are present in the disallowed region. The last four C-terminal amino acids are not visible in the electron density map. Validation with ERRAT server gave an overall quality factor of 97.03% [37]. The rmsd (root-mean-square distance) between the presented structure and the previously determined c-ring of the chloroplast ATP synthase (2W5J [12]) is 1.509 Å. The overall structure of the spinach chloroplast c-ring is shown in Figures 2(A) and 2(B). Each subunit c folds into a hairpin of two TM helices, connected by a short partially structured loop (Figure 2E). The individual hairpin, composed of an N-terminal TM and a C-terminal TM, produce an inner- and an outer ring. The N-terminal helices face the inner side of the ring, whereas the C-terminal helices face the outside of the loop. This arrangement facilitates interaction of the conserved glutamic acid residues of subunit c (Figure 3) with the conserved Arginine residue from subunit a, providing the structural requirements to form a part of the proton channel in the FO domain. Figures 2(C) and 2(D) display the electrostatic charge surface of this rotary entity. The cytoplasmic and the luminal surfaces of the c ring are very polar in nature as they are in contact with the aqueous phase. The hydrophilic patch at the centre of the membrane region represents the proton-binding site.
Table 2. Refinement statistics.
Refinement statistics | |
---|---|
*R factor(%) | 35.3 |
†R free(%) | 37.8 |
Ramachandran statistics | |
Most favored (%) | 97 |
Additionally allowed (%) | 2.1 |
Generously (%) | 0.9 |
Disallowed (%) | 0.0 |
R.M.S. deviations | |
Bond lengths (Å) | 0.019 |
Bond angles (°) | 2.019 |
Mean atomic B values (Å2) | |
Overall | 39.72 |
*R-factor=Σ∥FO|–|FC∥/Σ|FO|, where FO and FC are measured and calculated structure factors, respectively.
†R-free=Σ∥FO|–|FC∥/Σ|FO|, calculated from 5% of the reflections selected randomly and omitted from the refinement process.
The length of the spinach chloroplast c-ring assembly is 60.32 Å long. The outer ring diameter is 52.3 Å, and the inner ring has a width of 40 Å. The inner space would be wide enough to accommodate detergent molecules. Interestingly, electron density could be observed in the initial maps in this region. However, this cannot be confirmed at this moderate resolution. Previously studies of 2D crystals of the intact CFO or c14a complex by AFM and Cryo-electron microscopy revealed distinct mass/electron density inside and protruding from the c14-cylinder. The isolated c14-cylinder, however, was ‘empty’ [41,42]. The electron density for the hairpin was continuous. Because of the achieved resolution, only the density for the main chains could be identified (Figure 2E).
The crystal lattice reveals one c-ring consisting of 14 monomers (c14 ring) in the asymmetric unit forming crystal contacts with three neighbouring rings. The κ=180° section of the self-rotation function, calculated for the crystal form using MOLREP (Collaborative Computational Project No. 4) with an integration radius of 20.0 Å and data in the resolution range 15–6 Å, showed a string of 14 peaks. The loop region of one ring is in close contact with the loop region of its symmetry mate. The other two points of contact in the crystal lattice involves the monomers in the N-terminal region.
Comparison with c-rotors of other organisms
Crystallographic structures of the c-ring rotors have been reported for F-ATP synthases from Ilyobacter tartaricus [9], Spirulina platensis [13], Pisum sativum [38] and Saccharomyces cerevesiae [7,10]. Among all the c-ring structures, only the spinach and pea chloroplasts are related by tetradecameric symmetry in the asymmetric unit. Despite this similarity, the two display markedly different shapes, with the c-ring of P. sativum taking up a concave barrel shape with a pronounced waist in the middle, whereas that of spinach chloroplast has a much less pronounced concave curvature.
The diameters of these c-ring rotors differ from organism to organism, because of the variation in the number of protomers. The undecameric c-ring of I. tartaricus shows a cylindrical, hourglass shaped protein complex with an outer diameter of ~50 Å and inner diameter of ~17 Å [9]. The pea chloroplast c-ring has an outer ring diameter of 60.5 Å and an inner ring diameter of 35 Å [38]. The c15 ring from S. platensis has an hour glass shaped assembly with an outer diameter of 65 Å and an inner diameter of 54 Å [13]. The yeast c-ring diameter in the F1c10 complex structure is ~55 Å and the inner diameter is ~27 Å and comprises ten protomers [7]. In comparison, the spinach chloroplast c14 ring presented here has an external diameter of 52.30 Å, whereas that of the inner ring is 40 Å. From the perspective of bioenergetic costs 14 protons have to be translocated across the thylakoid membrane per full rotation of the rotary c-ring, whereby each rotation of 360° produces three molecules of ATP in the α3β3-headpiece of F1. Therefore 3.7 protons are needed to synthesize one molecule of ATP in the spinach chloroplast F-ATP synthase. In comparison, 2.7 protons per ATP are required for the bovine mitochondrial F-ATP synthase, whose c-ring consists of eight c subunits [8], reflecting a more efficient enzyme with respect to protons consumed per ATP generated, at least at first glance. However, the two components of the proton-motive force, i.e. the membrane potential and the pH gradient, are kinetically not equivalent and different sizes of the cation-powered rotors may be nature's solution to cope with the challenges of diverse environments [42].
Recently, two more c-ring crystal structures have been solved, one from Fusobacterium nucleatum, which has 11 protomers [39], and the other from Bacillus pseudofirmus OF4, which has 13 protomers [40]. These studies demonstrated that the alanine motif in the c13-ring from B. pseudofirmus OF4 contributes to high complex stability, with A-to-G mutations reducing the c-ring stoichiometry, in this case from c13 to c12, whereas G-to-A mutations increases it. From the sequence alignment in Figure 3, it can be seen that the c11-ring of I. tartaricus consists of 17.8% alanine residues compared with an alanine content of 21.8% in the c14-ring of the spinach chloroplast F-ATP synthase investigated here.
There is urgent need to determine the structure of the intact CFO turbine, in order to elucidate the spatial arrangement of the subunits b and b’, and especially of subunit a in relation to the c14-ring. This would also lead to an answer to the pertinent question of how the c-ring is made proton-tight so as to prevent harmful proton leaks across its central structure, that would otherwise bypass the specific proton pathway between subunit a and the c subunits.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors sincerely thank Dr Kamariah Neelagandan (School of Biological Sciences, NTU) and the staff at the protein crystallography beamline S06 PX at the Swiss Light Source (SLS) for expert help with data collection. We also thank Professor M. Featherstone (SBS, NTU) for reading the manuscript.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION
Asha Manikkoth Balakrishna did the crystallization, data analysis and solved the structure and the refinement. Sven-Hendric Marx purified the protein. Holger Seeler and Norbert A. Dencher contributed to the experimental design of assays and discussions. Gerhard Grüber designed the studies and experiments and supervised the research. All authors participated in writing the paper.
FUNDING
This work was supported by the Ministry of Education (MOE), Singapore [grant number MOE2011-T2-2-156; ARC 18/12; to G.G.].
References
- 1.Boekema E. J., van Heel M., Gräber P. Structure of chloroplast F1 ATPase studied by electron microscopy and image processing. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1998;933:365–371. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(86)90071-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Seelert H., Poetsch A., Dencher N. A, Engel A., Stahlberg H., Müller D. J. Structural biology. Proton-powered turbine of a plant motor. Nature. 2000;405:418–419. doi: 10.1038/35013148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Varco-Merth B., Fromme R., Wang M., Fromme P. Crystallization of the c14-rotor of the chloroplast ATP synthase reveals that it contains pigments. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2008;1777:605–612. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2008.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Abrahams J. P, Leslie A. G. W., Lutter R., Walker J. E. Structure at 2.8-angstom resolution of F1-ATPase from bovine heart-mitochondria. Nature. 1994;370:621–628. doi: 10.1038/370621a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Junge W., Lill H., Engelbrecht S. ATP synthase: an electrochemical transducer with rotatory mechanics. TIBS. 1997;22:420–423. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(97)01129-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gibbons C., Montgomery M. G., Leslie A. G. W., Walker J. E. The structure of the central stalk in bovine F(1)-ATPase at 2.4 A resolution. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2000;7:1055–1061. doi: 10.1038/80981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Stock D., Leslie A. G. W., Walker J. E. Molecular architecture of the rotary motor in ATP synthase. Science. 1999;286:1700–1705. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5445.1700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Watt I. N., Montgomery M. G., Runswick M. J., Leslie A. G. W., Walker J. E. Bioenergetic cost of making an adenosine triphosphate molecule in animal mitochondria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010;107:16823–16827. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011099107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Meier T., Polzer P., Diederichs K., Welte W., Dimroth P. Structure of the rotor ring of F-Type Na+-ATPase from Ilyobacter tartaricus. Science. 2005;308:659–662. doi: 10.1126/science.1111199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Symersky J., Pagadala V., Osowsk D., Krah K., Meier T., Faraldo-Gómez J. D., Mueller D. M. Structure of the c(10) ring of the yeast mitochondrial ATP synthase in the open conformation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2012;19:485–491. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Matthies D., Preiss L., Klyszejko A. L., Müller D. J., Cook G. M., Vonck J., Meier T. The c13 ring from a thermoalkaliphilic ATP synthase reveals an extended diameter due to a special structural region. J. Mol. Biol. 2009;388:611–618. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.03.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vollmar M., Schlieper D., Winn M., Buchner C., Groth G. Structure of the c14 rotor ring of the proton translocating chloroplast ATP synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:18228–18235. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.006916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Murshudov G. N., Vagin A. A., Dodson E. J. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr. D. 1997;53:240–255. doi: 10.1107/S0907444996012255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pogoryelov D., Krah A., Langer J. D., Yildiz O., Faraldo-Gómez J. D., Meier T. Microscopic rotary mechanism of ion translocation in the F(o) complex of ATP synthases. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2010;6:891–899. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pick U., Racker E. Purification and reconstitution of the N,N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide-sensitive ATPase complex from spinach chloroplasts. J. Biol. Chem. 1979;254:2793–2799. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Seelert H., Poetsch A., Rohlfs M., Dencher N. A. Dye-ligand chromatographic purification of intact multisubunit membrane protein complexes: application to the chloroplast H+-FOF1-ATP synthase. Biochem. J. 2000;346:41–44. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Neff D., Dencher N. A. Purification of multisubunit membrane protein complexes: isolation of chloroplast FOF1–ATP synthase, CFO and CF1 by blue native electrophoresis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999;259:569–575. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Krause F., Seelert H. Detection and analysis of protein-protein interactions of organellar and prokaryotic proteomes by blue native and colorless native gel electrophoresis. Curr. Protoc. Protein Sci. 2008;51:14.11.1–14.11.36. doi: 10.1002/0471140864.ps1411s51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zerbetto E., Vergani L., Dabbeni-Sala F. Quantification of muscle mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation enzymes via histochemical staining of blue native polyacrylamide gels. Electrophoresis. 2000;18:2059–2064. doi: 10.1002/elps.1150181131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Suhai T., Heidrich N. G., Dencher N. A., Seelert H. Highly sensitive detection of ATPase activity in native gels. Electrophoresis. 2009;30:3622–3625. doi: 10.1002/elps.200900114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227:680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Suhai T., Dencher N. A., Poetsch A., Seelert H. Remarkable stability of the proton translocating F1FO-ATP synthase from the thermophilic cyanobacterium Thermosynechococcus elongatus BP-1. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2008;1778:1131–1140. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fischer S., Etzold C., Turina P., Deckers-Hebestreit G., Altendorf K., Gräber P. ATP synthesis catalyzed by the ATP synthase of Escherichia coli reconstituted into liposomes. Eur. J. Biochem. 1994;225:167–172. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.00167.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Poetsch A., Rexroth S., Heberle J., Link T., Dencher N. A., Seelert H. Characterisation of subunit III and its oligomer from spinach chloroplast ATP synthase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2003;1618:59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2003.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Battye T. G. G., Kontogiannis L., Johnson O., Powell H. R., Leslie A. G. W. iMOSFLM: a new graphical interface for diffraction-image processing with MOSFLM. Acta Crystallogr. D. 2011;67:271–281. doi: 10.1107/S0907444910048675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Evans P. Scaling and assessment of data quality. Acta Crystallogr. D. 2006;62:72–82. doi: 10.1107/S0907444905036693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.French G., Wilson K. On the treatment of negative intensity observations. Acta Crystallogr. A. 1978;34:517–525. [Google Scholar]
- 28.McCoy A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve R. W., Adams P. D., Winn M. D., Storoni L. C., Read R. J. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2007;40:658–674. doi: 10.1107/S0021889807021206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dyda F. Developments in low-resolution biological X-ray crystallography. Biol. Rep. 2010;2:80–82. doi: 10.3410/B2-80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Emsley P., Cowtan K. COOT: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D. 2004;60:2126–2132. doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Murshudov G. N., Vagin A. A., Dodson E. J. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr. D. 1997;53:240–255. doi: 10.1107/S0907444996012255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Nicholls R. A., Long F., Murshudov G. N. Low-resolution refinement tools in REFMAC5. Acta Crystallogr. D. 2012;68:404–417. doi: 10.1107/S090744491105606X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Laskowski R. A., MacArthur M. W., Moss D. S., Thorton J. M. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1993;26:283–291. [Google Scholar]
- 34.DeLano W. L. The Pymol molecular graphics system. USA: DeLano Scientific; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Krissinel E., Henrick K. Secondary-structure matching (SSM), a new tool for fast protein structure alignment in three dimensions. Acta Crystallogr. D. 2004;60:2256–2268. doi: 10.1107/S0907444904026460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Matthews B. W. Solvent content of protein crystals. J. Mol. Biol. 1968;33:491–497. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(68)90205-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Colovos C., Yeates T. O. Verification of protein structures: patterns of nonbonded atomic interactions. Protein Sci. 1993;2:1511–1519. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560020916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Saroussi S., Schushan M., Ben-Tal N., Junge W., Nelson N. Structure and flexibility of the c-ring in the electromotor of rotary F(0)F(1)-ATPase of pea chloroplasts. PloS ONE. 2012;7:e43045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Schulz S., Iglesias-Cans M., Krah A., Yildiz O., Leone V., Matthies D., Cook G. M., Faraldo-Gómez J. D., Meier T. A new type of Na(+)-driven ATP synthase membrane rotor with a two-carboxylate ion-coupling motif. PLoS Biol. 2013;6:e1001596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Preiss L., Klyszejko A. L., Hicks D. B., Liu J., Fackelmayer O. J., Yildiz Ö., Krulwich T. A., Meier T. The c-ring stoichiometry of ATP synthase is adapted to cell physiological requirements of alkaliphilic Bacillus pseudofirmus OF4. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013;110:7874–7879. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1303333110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Seelert H., Dencher N. A., Müller D. J. Fourteen protomers compose the oligomer III of the proton-rotor of spinach chloroplast ATP-synthase. J. Mol. Biol. 2003;333:337–344. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.08.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Seelert H., Dani D. N., Dante S., Hauβ T., Krause F., Schäfer E., Frenzel M., Poetsch A., Rexroth S., Schwaβmann H. J., et al. From protons to OXPHOS supercomplexes and Alzheimer's disease: structure-dynamics-function relationships of energy-converting membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2009;1787:657–671. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2009.02.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]