Bennett et al. [1] present the phylogenetic distribution of salt-tolerant species on a phylogeny of 2684 grasses in the context of plant breeding for salt-tolerance. Salt-tolerance, they conclude, is an evolutionary labile trait that has evolved a number of times across many lineages; this is at odds with the record of difficulty in breeding salt-tolerant crops.
One potential explanation for this disconnect is the association between soil salinity and alkalinity; many saline soils are also alkaline due to the presence of sodium (Na)-carbonates (see [2] for a review of salt-affected soils). Combined alkaline and salt-stresses are more deleterious to plant growth than salinity alone [3–5]. Thus, the failure of laboratory-bred NaCl-tolerant cultivars to give good yields under field conditions may reflect combined soil sodicity and alkalinity. Indeed, Yang et al. [4] have shown that for even for Chloris virgata, a natural alkali-resistant halophyte, the inhibitory effects of alkali stress (from NaHCO3 and Na2CO3) on relative growth rate and stored energy were significantly larger than those of salt-stress (from NaCl and Na2SO4). Other Chloris species are tolerant of alkaline pH (e.g. Chloris gayana [6] and Chloris barbata [7]), and it would be interesting to see whether there is any evolutionary relationship between alkali- and salt-tolerance in Chloris and more widely in the Chloridoideae. Has there been coevolution of alkali- and salt-tolerance in grasses? If yes, this may provide new avenues for plant breeding for salt-tolerance.
Both alkali- and salt-stress impact photosynthetic productivity and metabolism, but they may involve different physiological and molecular processes ([8–11] and references therein). However, plant breeding efforts continue to focus on NaCl-tolerance [12]. In Australia, where decades of research on plant breeding for salt-tolerance have been invested, 50% of soils are calcareous [13] and therefore contain significant concentrations of carbonate and bicarbonate ions (alkalinity). Sodic soils occupy about 27% of Australia [14], including large tracts of agricultural land; most have calcareous subsoils. This implies that a wider range of salts and their potential interactions need to be considered if we are to successfully breed salt-tolerant crops that are high-yielding under field conditions. It also suggests that new breakthroughs in food security are likely to arise at the intersection of disciplines (plant and soil sciences).
Footnotes
The accompanying reply can be viewed at http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0642.
References
- 1.Bennett TH, Flowers TJ, Bromham L. 2013. Repeated evolution of salt-tolerance in grasses. Biol. Lett. 9, 20130029 (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2013.0029) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rengasamy P. 2010. Soil processes affecting crop production in salt-affected soils. Funct. Plant Biol. 37, 613–620 (doi:10.1071/FP09249) [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shi D, Sheng Y. 2005. Effect of various salt–alkaline mixed stress conditions on sunflower seedlings and analysis of their stress factors. Environ. Exp. Bot. 54, 8–21 (doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.05.003) [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yang CW, Jianaer A, Li CY, Shi DC, Wang DL. 2008. Comparison of the effects of salt-stress and alkali-stress on photosynthesis and energy storage of an alkali-resistant halophyte Chloris virgata. Photosynthetica 46, 273–278 (doi:10.1007/s11099-008-0047-3) [Google Scholar]
- 5.Li R, Shi F, Fukuda K. 2010. Interactive effects of various salt and alkali stresses on growth, organic solutes, and cation accumulation in a halophyte Spartina alterniflora (Poaceae). Environ. Exp. Bot. 68, 66–74 (doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.10.004) [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bogdan AV. 1958. Some edaphic vegetational types at Kiboko, Kenya. J. Ecol. 46, 115–126 (doi:10.2307/2256907) [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rana RS, Parkash V. 1987. Floristic characterisation of alkali soils in northwestern India. Plant Soil 99, 447–451 (doi:10.1007/BF02370890) [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nishiuchi S, Fujihara K, Liu S, Takano T. 2010. Analysis of expressed sequence tags from a NaHCO3-treated alkali-tolerant plant, Chloris virgata. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 48, 247–255 (doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.01.024) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yang C, Guo W, Shi D. 2010. Physiological roles of organic acids in alkali-tolerance of the alkali-tolerant halophyte Chloris virgata. Agron. J. 102, 1081–1089 (doi:10.2134/agronj2009.0471) [Google Scholar]
- 10.Javid M, Nicolas M, Ford R. 2011. Current knowledge in physiological and genetic mechanisms underpinning tolerances to alkaline and saline subsoil constraints of broad acre cropping in dryland regions. In Abiotic stress in plants - mechanisms and adaptations (eds Shanker A, Venkateswarlu B.), pp. 193–214 Rijeka, Croatia: InTech; See http://www.intechopen.com/books/abiotic-stress-in-plants-mechanisms-and-adaptations/current-knowledge-in-physiological-and-genetic-mechanisms-underpinning-tolerances-to-alkaline-and-sa [Google Scholar]
- 11.Luo Q, Takano T, Liu S. 2012. Proteomic analysis of Chloris virgata leaves under carbonate stress. Cell Biol. Biophys. 1, 1–7 See http://bio.sophiapublisher.com/abstract-514-cbb [Google Scholar]
- 12.Munns R, James RA, Läuchli A. 2006. Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals. J. Exp. Bot. 57, 1025–1043 (doi:10.1093/jxb/erj100) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fitzpatrick RW, Merry RH. 2000. Pedogenic carbonate pools and climate change in Australia. In Global climate change and pedogenic carbonates (eds Lal R, Kimble JM, Eswaran H, Stewart BA.), pp. 105–120 Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press [Google Scholar]
- 14.Northcote KH, Skene JKM. 1972. Australian soils with saline and sodic properties. Melbourne, Australia: CSIRO [Google Scholar]
