Abstract
A therapeutic aptamer-lipid-poly(lactide-co-glycolic acid) hybrid nanoparticle-based drug delivery system was prepared and characterized. The hybrid can co-deliver two different drugs with distinct solubility characteristics and different anticancer mechanisms to target cancer cells with high specificity and efficiency.
Nanobiotechnology, in particular methods based on nanoparticles, has made a significant contribution to the improvement of drug delivery in cancer therapy. Several types of nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems have been developed for this purpose.1–3 Among these, drug delivery systems based on poly(lactide-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles (PLGA NPs) play an important role in cancer therapy. PLGA is a biocompatible and biodegradable polymer, which has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), with an established clinical safety record.4 Based on their hydrophobic nature, PLGA nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems have been mainly used to carry hydrophobic drugs.5–7
A new type delivery system with efficient hydrophobic drug loading capacity combined with good stability was recently introduced with the fabrication of PLGA-lecithin-polyethylene glycol (PEG) core-shell nanoparticles.8–14 PEG-passivated PLGA NPs are especially desirable because their extended systemic circulation time allows preferential accumulation at the tumor site.15–17 Furthermore, the surface of PLGA NPs can be modified with various molecular recognition moieties, including folates, peptides, antibodies and aptamers, for specific targeting to reduce side effects.11, 18–25 Among these ligands, aptamers generated from cell SELEX26 exhibit both high specificity and high binding affinity. Furthermore, aptamers can be easily synthesized and chemically modified for molecular conjugation. This study demonstrates that the aptamer modified PLGA-lecithin-PEG nanoparticles can be prepared via one-step self-assembly and then used for targeted co-delivery of two types of drugs.
Because of their excellent antitumor efficiency against various solid tumors, doxorubicin hydrochloride (DOX) and paclitaxel (PTX) are commonly used as chemotherapeutic drugs.27, 28 Some clinical studies have shown that the incorporation of both DOX and PTX increases antitumor efficiency compared to the individual drugs28, 29 and these two drugs with different release rates still show a synergistic effect.24 However, these drugs have distinct solubility characteristics and different anticancer mechanisms. DOX is a hydrophilic drug which binds to DNA and induces a series of biochemical events leading to apoptosis.30 In contrast, PTX is a highly hydrophobic drug, which inhibits microtubule disassembly and promotes the formation of unusually stable microtubules, thereby causing cell apoptosis.31, 32 Thus, designing a simple co-delivery system is the key point for successful combinational therapy. However, by their differences in solubility, it is not easy to realize targeted co-delivery of DOX and PTX with one carrier. 27
To address these issues, we synthesized aptamer-coated PLGA hybrid nanoparticles with core-shell lipid–polymeric structures via simple nanoprecipitation and self-assembly (Scheme 1). Aptamer sgc8, which can bind human protein tyrosine kinase 7 (PTK7) overexpressed on target CEM (human T-cell acute lymphocytic leukemia) cell membranes, but not nontarget Ramos cells26, 33, was chosen as a model ligand. The sgc8 aptamer was then designed to hybridize with a diacyllipid-modified DNA strand via a tail with repetitive 5′-GCA-3′ sequences, where DOX can be intercalated by preferential interaction with double-stranded GC/CG regions.34, 35 In our previous study, the lipid-modified DNA was used for rapid and simple modification of hydrophobic particles.36 In this new design, after self-assembly, hydrophobic PLGA with encapsulated hydrophobic PTX constitutes the core structure, while lecithin, DSPE-PEG and lipid-PEG-aptamer loading DOX form the hydrophilic shell. The average NP size measured by dynamic light scattering was 117±5 nm. Transmission electron micrograph (TEM) images obtained with 1 mg/mL nanoparticles stained with uranyl acetate solution showed, as expected, spherically shaped nanoparticles with core-shell structures (Fig. S1).
Scheme 1.

Schematic illustration of self-assembled hybrid nanoparticles for targeted co-delivery of two different drugs into cancer cells. The nanoparticles have a core-shell structure: lecithin, DSPE-PEG and lipid-PEG-aptamer loading DOX form the hydrophilic shell; PLGA encapsulating PTX forms the hydrophobic core.
To ensure that DOX was successfully loaded into the shell part of particles and that PTX was successfully encapsulated inside the core, both fluorescence spectroscopy and reversed-phase HPLC were used to characterize the NPs. FAM fluorescence (labeled in the DNA-formed shell part) showed a significant decrease in intensity after DOX drug loading as a consequence of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) from FAM to DOX (Fig. S2), indicating that DOX had been successfully loaded into the particle shells. The HPLC results indicate that NPs dissolved in acetonitrile eluted at the same time as pure PTX dissolved in the same solvent (Fig. S3), indicating that PTX had, indeed, been encapsulated into the NPs. According to the HPLC peak area of pure PTX and the PTX peak area of the NPs, the PTX encapsulation efficiency was calculated to be 35% of the drug input weight, and the weight percentage of paclitaxel in the loaded PLGA was determined to be ~3.5%.
After successfully synthesizing these hybrid particles, we further verified the selective binding of the NPs to target CEM cells through flow cytometric analysis (Fig. 1) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (Fig. 2 a, b). Compared to control Ramos cells, the CEM cells showed a larger fluorescence signal shift and a higher TAMRA fluorescence (Fig. 2 a), indicating that the NPs could selectively interact with target cells. For efficient drug delivery, it is essential that NPs be internalized by diseased cells. Previous work showed that sgc8 is specifically internalized by target CEM cells via endocytosis37 and aptamer modified NPs are internalized into the target cells through ligand-receptor interaction-induced endocytosis.38 Compared with the results for Ramos cells (37 °C; Fig. 2 d), a higher TAMRA fluorescence signal in the CEM cells showed that TAMRA-labeled NPs were selectively internalized into target CEM cells at physiological temperature (37 °C; Fig. 2 c).
Fig. 1.

Flow cytometry analysis of hybrid nanoparticles targeting cells. a) CEM (positive) cells were treated with 10 μg nanoparticles (black line) for 30 min at 4 °C, along with the control unstained cells (red line). b) Ramos (negative) cells were used as a control cell line for target specificity.
Fig 2.

Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of CEM and Ramos cells treated with 10 μg nanoparticles. a, b) Cells treated with NPs for 30 min at 4°C ; c, d) Cells treated with NPs for 2 h at 37°C. The scale bars correspond to 20 μm.
To further visualize cell uptake of the NPs and to see the distribution of both core and shell using fluorescence microscopy, the hydrophobic dye TRITC-DHPE (excitation/emission=555 nm/580 nm) was encapsulated inside the FAM-labeled hybrid NPs. Figure S4 shows that PTK7-targeted TRITC DHPE-encapsulated NPs were selectively taken up by CEM cells, which express the PTK7 protein (Fig. S4 a, c), but not by Ramos cells, which do not express the PTK7 protein (Fig. S4 b, d). As can be seen, the TRITC-DHPE and FAM signals are colocalized, indicating that the NPs were taken up by CEM cells in their entirety. The small TRITC- DHPE and FAM signals from Ramos cells may represent a portion of free TRITC-DHPE and free FAM-labeled lipid-DNA released from the NPs during incubation or, alternatively, may represent nonspecific uptake of particles by the Ramos cells.
Finally, the selective cytotoxicity of anticancer drugs transported by hybrid NPs was tested. The DOX/PTX pair was used to demonstrate the synergistic effect of co-delivery of two chemotherapeutic drugs in the same nanoparticles. Having established that drugs could be selectively transported into target cells by NPs, the resultant cytotoxicity was evaluated by a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (MTS) assay. In this assay, both target CEM cells and nontarget Ramos cells were treated with NPs with different drug loading (Fig. 3). As shown in Figure 3, co-delivery of DOX and PTX significantly reduced the targeted CEM cell viability, but Ramos cells were not affected. This demonstrated the synergistic cytotoxic efficacy of NPs carrying two drugs into target cells. In contrast, the lack of cytotoxicity of NPs without drug loading in either CEM or Ramos cells indicates the biocompatibility of these transporters under our experimental conditions.
Fig 3.
Cytotoxicity assay of CEM and Ramos cells treated with nanoparticles with different drug loading.
In summary, biocompatible NPs with core-shell structures prepared by self-assembly from PLGA and lipid-modified DNA aptamer were employed as carriers for targeted co-delivery of DOX and PTX in antitumor therapy. The hydrophobic drug PTX can be easily encapsulated into the hydrophobic core through hydrophobic interaction, while hydrophilic DOX can be loaded by intercalating into double-stranded DNA on the hydrophilic shell. The cellular uptake results show that the NPs can be selectively taken up by target CEM cancer cells. Using this concept, we have successfully co-delivered these two drugs with distinct solubility to target cancer cells. The cytotoxicity results show that this targeted co-delivery system selectively enhances antitumor efficacy. Other NPs of this type can be used for targeted co-delivery of other hydrophobic drugs and other intercalation drugs.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank the National Institutes of Health (GM079359 and CA133086), the National Key Scientific Program of China (2011CB911000), NSFC (grant 21221003), China National Instrumentation Program 2011YQ03012412, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 20934004 and 91127046) and the National Basic Research Program of China (NBRPC; grants 2012CB821500 and 2010CB934500) for financial support.
Footnotes
Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: Synthetic procedures, experimental details, additional spectroscopic and confocal image data. See DOI: 10.1039/b000000x/
Contributor Information
Haojun Liang, Email: hjliang@ustc.edu.cn.
Weihong Tan, Email: tan@chem.ufl.edu.
References
- 1.Peer D, Karp JM, Hong S, FaroKHzad OC, Margalit R, Langer R. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007;2:751–760. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2007.387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Davis ME, Chen Z, Shin DM. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7:771–782. doi: 10.1038/nrd2614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kamaly N, Xiao ZY, Valencia PM, Radovic-Moreno AF, Farokhzad OC. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41:2971–3010. doi: 10.1039/c2cs15344k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Langer R. Nature. 1998;392:5–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Win KY, Feng SS. Biomaterials. 2005;26:2713–2722. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fonseca C, Simoes S, Gaspar R. J Control Release. 2002;83:273–286. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(02)00212-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cheng FY, Su CH, Wu PC, Yeh CS. Chem Commun. 2010;46:3167–3169. doi: 10.1039/b919172k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chan JM, Zhang LF, Yuet KP, Liao G, Rhee JW, Langer R, Farokhzad OC. Biomaterials. 2009;30:1627–1634. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chan JM, Rhee JW, Drum CL, Bronson RT, Golomb G, Langer R, Farokhzad OC. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:19347–19352. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1115945108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fang RH, Aryal S, Hu CMJ, Zhang LF. Langmuir. 2010;26:16958–16962. doi: 10.1021/la103576a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Xiao ZY, Levy-Nissenbaum E, Alexis F, Luptak A, Teply BA, Chan JM, Shi JJ, Digga E, Cheng J, Langer R, Farokhzad OC. Acs Nano. 2012;6:696–704. doi: 10.1021/nn204165v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tan SW, Li X, Guo YJ, Zhang ZP. Nanoscale. 2013;5:860–872. doi: 10.1039/c2nr32880a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zheng MB, Yue CX, Ma YF, Gong P, Zhao PF, Zheng CF, Sheng ZH, Zhang PF, Wang ZH, Cai LT. Acs Nano. 2013;7:2056–2067. doi: 10.1021/nn400334y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhang LF, Chan JM, Gu FX, Rhee JW, Wang AZ, Radovic-Moreno AF, Alexis F, Langer R, Farokhzad OC. Acs Nano. 2008;2:1696–1702. doi: 10.1021/nn800275r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gref R, Minamitake Y, Peracchia MT, Trubetskoy V, Torchilin V, Langer R. Science. 1994;263:1600–1603. doi: 10.1126/science.8128245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Alexis F, Pridgen E, Molnar LK, Farokhzad OC. Mol Pharm. 2008;5:505–515. doi: 10.1021/mp800051m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Owens DE, Peppas NA. Int J Pharm. 2006;307:93–102. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kim SH, Jeong JH, Chun KW, Park TG. Langmuir. 2005;21:8852–8857. doi: 10.1021/la0502084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Liao ZY, Wang HJ, Wang XD, Zhao PQ, Wang S, Su WY, Chang J. Adv Funct Mater. 2011;21:1179–1186. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Costantino L, Gandolfi F, Tosi G, Rivasi F, Vandelli MA, Forni F. J Control Release. 2005;108:84–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yang J, Lee CH, Park J, Seo S, Lim EK, Song YJ, Suh JS, Yoon HG, Huh YM, Haam S. J Mater Chem. 2007;17:2695–2699. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dhar S, Kolishetti N, Lippard SJ, Farokhzad OC. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:1850–1855. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011379108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Guo JW, Gao XL, Su LN, Xia HM, Gu GZ, Pang ZQ, Jiang XG, Yao L, Chen J, Chen HZ. Biomaterials. 2011;32:8010–8020. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cui YN, Xu QX, Chow PKH, Wang DP, Wang CH. Biomaterials. 2013;34:8511–8520. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Aravind A, Varghese SH, Veeranarayanan S, Mathew A, Nagaoka Y, Iwai S, Fukuda T, Hasumura T, Yoshida Y, Maekawa T, Kumar DS. Cancer Nanotechnol. 2012;3:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s12645-011-0024-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shangguan D, Li Y, Tang ZW, Cao ZHC, Chen HW, Mallikaratchy P, Sefah K, Yang CYJ, Tan WH. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:11838–11843. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602615103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang H, Zhao Y, Wu Y, Hu YL, Nan KH, Nie GJ, Chen H. Biomaterials. 2011;32:8281–8290. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.07.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ahmed F, Pakunlu RI, Brannan A, Bates F, Minko T, Discher DE. J Control Release. 2006;116:150–158. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gustafson DL, Merz AL, Long ME. Cancer Lett. 2005;220:161–169. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2004.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lee S, Baek M, Kim HY, Ha JH, Jeoung DI. Biotechnol Lett. 2002;24:1147–1151. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Huang Y, Johnson KR, Norris JS, Fan WM. Cancer Res. 2000;60:4426–4432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Liu YO, Bhalla K, Hill C, Priest DG. Biochem Pharmacol. 1994;48:1265–1272. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(94)90164-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shangguan D, Cao ZH, Meng L, Mallikaratchy P, Sefah K, Wang H, Li Y, Tan WH. J Proteome Res. 2008;7:2133–2139. doi: 10.1021/pr700894d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bagalkot V, Farokhzad OC, Langer R, Jon S. Angew Chem Int Edit. 2006;45:8149–8152. doi: 10.1002/anie.200602251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhu GZ, Zheng J, Song EQ, Donovan M, Zhang KJ, Liu C, Tan WH. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:7998–8003. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220817110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chen T, Ocsoy I, Yuan Q, Wang RW, You MX, Zhao ZL, Song EQ, Zhang XB, Tan WH. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:13164–13167. doi: 10.1021/ja304115q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Xiao ZY, Shangguan DH, Cao ZH, Fang XH, Tan WH. Chem Eur J. 2008;14:1769–1775. doi: 10.1002/chem.200701330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Xiao OCFZ. Acs nano. 2012;6:3670–3676. doi: 10.1021/nn301869z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

