Abstract
Background
The present study analyzed whether or not the in vitro cultivation for long periods of time of pre-isolated Leishmania amazonensis from lesions of chronically infected BALB/c mice was able to interfere in the parasites' infectivity using in vivo and in vitro experiments. In addition, the proteins that presented a significant decrease or increase in their protein expression content were identified applying a proteomic approach.
Methodology/Principal Findings
Parasites were cultured in vitro for 150 days. Aliquots were collected on the day 0 of culture (R0), as well as after ten (R10; 50 days of culture), twenty (R20; 100 days of culture), and thirty (R30; 150 days of culture) passages, and were used to analyze the parasites' in vitro and in vivo infectivity, as well as to perform the proteomic approach. Approximately 837, 967, 935, and 872 spots were found in 2-DE gels prepared from R0, R10, R20, and R30 samples, respectively. A total of 37 spots presented a significant decrease in their intensity of expression, whereas a significant increase in protein content during cultivation could be observed for 19 proteins (both cases >2.0 folds). Some of these identified proteins can be described, such as diagnosis and/or vaccine candidates, while others are involved in the infectivity of Leishmania. It is interesting to note that six proteins, considered hypothetical in Leishmania, showed a significant decrease in their expression and were also identified.
Conclusions/Significance
The present study contributes to the understanding that the cultivation of parasites over long periods of time may well be related to the possible loss of infectivity of L. amazonensis. The identified proteins that presented a significant decrease in their expression during cultivation, including the hypothetical, may also be related to this loss of parasites' infectivity, and applied in future studies, including vaccine candidates and/or immunotherapeutic targets against leishmaniasis.
Author Summary
Leishmania amazonensis can induce a diversity of clinical manifestations in mammal hosts, including tegumentary and visceral leishmaniasis. The present study evaluated the variation of infectivity of L. amazonensis, which was pre-isolated from lesions of chronically infected mice and in vitro cultured for 150 days, in turn connecting these results with the profile of parasite protein expression using a proteomic approach. Parasites were recovered after the first passage, as well as after 50, 100, and 150 days of axenic cultures, and were subsequently evaluated. A total of 37 proteins presented a significant decrease, whereas 19 proteins presented a significant increase in their protein expression content in the assays (both cases >2.0 fold). Some of the identified proteins have been reported in prior literature, including diagnosis and/or vaccine candidates for leishmaniasis, while others proved to be involved in the infectivity of Leishmania. It is interesting to note that proteins related to the parasites' metabolism were also the majority of the proteins identified in the old cultures of L. amazonensis, suggesting a possible relation between the metabolic state of parasites and their possible loss of infectivity. In conclusion, the proteins identified in this study represent a contribution to the discovery of new vaccine candidates and/or immunotherapeutic targets against leishmaniasis.
Introduction
Leishmaniasis consists of a wide range of diseases present in 98 countries worldwide, where approximately 1.6 million cases occur each year, with an estimated 40,000 deaths [1]. Many geographic regions are endemic for multiple Leishmania species, which is the case in Brazil, where the disease is caused by at least six different species of Leishmania. Among them, Leishmania amazonensis presents a particular importance, as it is one of the main species capable of causing human disease with a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations, ranging from cutaneous to visceral leishmaniasis [2], [3]. In one study, it was also observed that BALB/c mice experimentally infected with L. amazonensis developed visceralization of the parasites in different organs, such as the brain, liver, spleen, and bone marrow, characterizing a diagnosis of murine visceral leishmaniasis [4].
It has been postulated that the in vitro maintenance of parasites by cultivation over long periods of time may well diminish their ability to differentiate into amastigote forms [5]. In fact, long-term axenic cultures were one of the first empirical approaches to efficiently identify parasite virulence genes, which later led to the experimental development of attenuated strains [6]. Similarly, the long-term in vitro growth of drug-resistant parasites was suggested to mediate the loss of resistance phenotype [7]. It is well-known that parasites can regulate their gene expression, mainly at the post-transcriptional level; however, little is known about the biological mechanisms and the protein expression involved in this process [8]. In this context, the identification of proteins involved either in the infectivity of parasites in the mammal hosts, or in their maintenance in axenic cultures, should be considered relevant.
The proteomic study applied to evaluate the protein expression patterns in Leishmania offers the possibility of assigning potential functions for proteins, including those previously identified by genomics as hypothetical, which should be evaluated, such as vaccine candidates, diagnostic markers, and/or immunotherapeutic targets. Several studies have been published evaluating the stage-specific expression and differentiation profiles of proteins in different Leishmania species [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. In addition, the discovery of new proteins through proteomics has been recommended as one of the main research priorities for further development and improvement of leishmaniasis vaccines [15].
In this context, the identification of proteins involved in parasites' infectivity should be considered important, given that they could be used in immunological applications to prevent the disease. In the present study, a proteomic approach, based on two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) and mass spectrometry, was carried out to analyze the variation of protein expression profiles in stationary promastigotes of L. amazonensis, which were pre-isolated from lesions of chronically infected BALB/c mice and maintained in axenic cultures over a long period of time. The proteins that presented significant variations in their levels during the in vitro cultivation were identified in an attempt to select new vaccine candidates and/or immunotherapeutic targets against leishmaniasis. The results showed several known, as well as six hypothetical, L. amazonensis proteins, some of which are well-known proteins involved in the infectivity of Leishmania, while others are described through the metabolic functions of the parasites.
Materials and Methods
Ethics statement
Experiments were performed in compliance with the National Guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee for the Ethical Handling of Research Animals (CEUA) from the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) (Law number 11.794, 2008), which approved this study on April 25, 2012, under protocol number 092/2012.
Mice and parasites
Female BALB/c mice (8 weeks of age) were obtained from the breeding facilities of the Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Institute of Biological Sciences, UFMG, and were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions. L. amazonensis (IFLA/BR/1967/PH-8) parasites were grown at 24°C in complete Schneider's medium , supplemented with 20% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 20 mM L-glutamine, 200 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 50 µg/ml gentamicin, at pH 7.4. The amastigote-like cells were obtained as described in [16].
In vivo infection
BALB/c mice (n = 8) were infected subcutaneously in their hind footpad with 1×106 stationary promastigotes of L. amazonensis. The course of the disease was monitored at weekly intervals by measuring footpad thickness with a metric caliper, and expressed as the increase in thickness of the infected footpad compared to the non-infected footpad. At week 8 post-infection, animals were sacrificed and their infected footpads, spleen, and liver were harvested for parasite quantification by a limiting-dilution assay [17]. To evaluate the in vivo infectivity of parasites in the different collected passages, R0 and R30 samples were used to infect BALB/c mice (n = 8, each group). The infection schedule and the parasitological analyses were the same as described above.
Preparation of the parasites for proteomics
Parasites were collected from infected footpads of the animals (8 weeks after infection) and purified to perform the proteomic approach. For this, parasites recovered from lesions were homogenized and immediately washed in Schneider's medium, which was supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin G/streptomycin sulfate solution, and subsequently cultured in complete Schneider's medium. Passages of in vitro cultures were performed every five days, until the thirtieth passage (150 days after). Aliquots were collected on day 0 of culture (R0, first passage), as well as 50 (R10), 100 (R20) and 150 (R30) days after the beginning of the cultures, and quantified for the experiments.
Evaluation of in vitro infectivity
Aliquots containing parasites of R0, R10, R20, and R30 passages were centrifuged for 10 min and 5,000× g, at 4°C. The supernatant was removed, and the pellet containing the parasites was washed 3 times with sterile PBS. Murine macrophages collected from BALB/c mice were plated on round glass coverslips within the wells of a 24-well culture plate, at a concentration of 5×105 cells per coverslip in RPMI 1640 medium, which was supplemented with 20% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 200 U/mL penicillin G, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin sulfate, at pH 7.4. After 2 h of incubation at 37°C in 5% CO2, stationary promastigotes of L. amazonensis were quantified and added to the wells (1×106 and 5×106, for a ratio of 1∶2 or 1∶10 macrophage per parasites, respectively). The cultures were incubated for 24 h at 37°C in 5% CO2. Next, the cells were washed and stained to determine the percentages of infected macrophages and the number of intra-macrophage amastigotes by counting 200 cells in triplicate [18]. An optical microscopy was also used to check the stationary profile of all in vitro cultures, and a prior titration curve was performed to determine the best time of infection for the macrophages (data not shown).
Preparation of total extract of Leishmania
The total extraction of proteins of L. amazonensis was performed following a technical protocol [19]. Briefly, 2×108 stationary promastigotes were dissolved in a DeStreak rehydratation solution, containing phosphatases (5 mM NaF, 2 mM Na3VO4, and 50 mM Na β-glycerophosphate) and proteases (Protease Inhibitor Cocktail; plus 1 mM PMSF) inhibitors. After homogenization, samples were disrupted by sonication in an ice bath for 15 min by applying a continuous pulse and centrifuged at 20,000× g for 7 min, at 4°C. The supernatant was collected, and the protein concentration was estimated using the Bradford method [20]. Aliquots were immediately frozen at −80°C, until use. For each passage, cellular material was extracted from the parasites harvested from two different animals, and two independent culture bottles of each animal were grown separately, totaling four individual samples.
Isoelectric focusing
The isoelectric focalization (IEF) was performed using the Ettan IPGphor3 system. For the first-dimension electrophoresis, 650 µg of total extracts were added to a volume of 250 µL with a rehydration solution containing a DeStreak rehydratation solution in 1% immobilized pH gradient buffer (IPG-buffer, pH 4–7). Next, samples were applied to IPG strips (13 cm, pH 4–7; GE Healthcare) for passive rehydration for 18 h at room temperature. After gel rehydration, IEF was performed at 1,000 V for 800 V/h; 8,000 V for 11,500 V/h; holding at 8,000 V for 7,500 V/h.
SDS-PAGE
After IEF, each strip was incubated for 15 min with 1% dithiothreitol (DTT) in the equilibrium buffer [75 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.8; 6 M urea, 39% (v/v) glycerol, and 2% (w/v) SDS], followed by a second incubation step for 15 min in 2.5% iodoacetamide diluted in equilibrium buffer. IPG strips were washed with milli-Q water, transferred to a 12% polyacrilamide, and sealed with an agarose solution (0.5% agarose in running buffer, containing 25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, and 0.1% SDS, pH 8.3). The protein standard was purchased from BioRad (pre-stained SDS-PAGE broad range). Electrophoresis was performed using a SE 600 ruby standard dual cooled vertical unit system connected to a MultiTemp III cooling bath. Proteins were separated at 30 mA/gel.
Protein digestion, peptide extraction, and spot handling
The 2-DE gels were stained with colloidal Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250, following a defined technical procedure [21]. For image analysis, 16 stained gels were scanned using an ImageScanner III. Analyses were carried out using ImageMaster 2D Platinum 7.0 software. This software identifies spots on a gel image (300 dpi) by comparing the number of pixels in the background image to the number of pixels that make up the image of the spot itself. The spots present in the images are differentiated from other gels by determining the spot's position through the manual insertion of image markers. The parameters used for spot detection included: minimal area of 5 pixels, with a smooth factor of 4 and a saliency of 80. The reference gel (higher number of spots) was used to match corresponding protein spots within different gels. The intensity volume of individual spots was normalized by the total intensity volume (value of the intensity volumes obtained from all spots in the same 2-DE gel) so as to remain relatively independent of variations due to protein loading and staining, performed by considering the total volume of all spots in the images. All of the spots selected by software were checked manually. The statistical test of analysis of variance (One-way ANOVA) was performed at a 1% statistical significance level (P<0.01) to determine the mean values of spot intensity for each passage (R0, R10, R20, and R30) in an attempt to determine the significant changes among the passages. Additionally, this study applied a cut-off of at least 2-fold of the core value of intensity of all spots selected by the program, which were the same in each passage. The obtained fold value was the number obtained by the ratio between the higher and lower core values of each spot's passage. Spots that presented significant variations within the passages were manually excised and destained with a solution containing 50% methanol and 2.5% acetic acid. The proteins were reduced in 10 mM DTT and alkylated using 50 mM iodoacetamide. Limited protein enzymatic digestion was performed with 0.4 or 0.8 µg of trypsin for larger spots. Excess protease was removed and replaced by 25 mM ammonium bicarbonate. Digestion was performed at 37°C for 18 h. Peptide extraction was performed twice for 15 min, using 30 µL of a solution containing 50% acetonitrile and 5% formic acid. The digested samples were dried using a speed-vac.
Protein identification and database search
The identification of proteins was performed at the Mass Spectrometry Laboratory of the Brazilian Biosciences National Laboratory (LNBio, CNPEM/ABTLuS, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil). This procedure was conducted using an ESI-Quad-TOF apparatus attached to a UPLC system. The mass spectra were processed by the Protein Lynx V 2.1 program and analyzed by the MASCOT MS/MS Ion Search program (http://www.matrixscience.com). The following parameters were used for this analysis: enzyme, trypsin; allowing of up to 1 missed cleavage; fixed modification, carbamidomethyl (C); variable modification, oxidation (M); peptide tolerance, ±0.1 Da; MS/MS tolerance, ±0.1 Da; and a peptide charge of 1+, 2+, and 3+. The database Leishmania (dated June 2012) was used for protein identification, the records of which can be found in the NCBI concerning Leishmania spp. (49,496 sequences; 30,861,888 residues). All data regarding the proteins evaluated in the present study were harvested from NCBI, UniProt, and Gene Ontology databases.
Immunoblotting 2-DE analysis
To validate the proteins identified in this study, such as the significant decrease or increase in their expression content after cultivation, Western blot experiments and 2-DE gel quantitation were performed. Whole cell extracts of stationary promastigotes and amastigotes-like forms of L. amazonensis were separated electrophoretically from R0 and R30 passages and transferred onto cellulose membranes (Schleicher & Schull, Dassel, Germany) by semi-dry blotting for 2 h at 400 mA. Membranes were blocked in 5% (w/v) low-fat dried milk diluted in TBS plus 0.05% Tween 20 for 16 h at 4°C. Next, the membranes were washed 3 times with a solution containing TBS and 0.05% Tween 20 (TBS-T, 10 min each) and were pre-incubated with anti-α-tubulin (1∶1,000 dilution), anti-HSP83 (1∶1,000 dilution), anti-GRP78 (1∶2,000 dilution), or anti-paraflagellar rod protein 1D (1∶2,000 dilution) antibodies for 2 h at room temperature. After, membranes were washed 6 times with TBS-T (10 min each) and incubated with a peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (1∶40,000 dilution) for 2 h at room temperature. After having been washed 7 times with TBS-T (10 min each), the reaction was processed using ECL™ Western Blotting Detection Reagent and ImageQuant LAS4000 equipment. The Ponceau S staining of each membrane was used as a loading control (data not shown). The band intensity of each protein was quantified by Image J software. The normalized values were obtained in the comparison between R0 and R30 of each parasite stage. The experiments were performed in triplicate, and the Student's t-test (P<0.05) was employed in the statistical analyses.
Statistical analysis
The statistical analysis of the in vitro and in vivo infectivity experiments was performed using the GraphPad Prism software (version 5.0 for Windows). The differences were evaluated by one-way ANOVA analysis, followed by the Bonferroni' test. Differences were considered significant when P<0.05. Statistical analyses evaluating the intensity and variation of the protein expression profile in the 2-DE gels and immunoblotting were also performed, as described above. The data are representative of three independent experiments, performed in triplicate, which presented similar results.
Results
Evaluation of in vivo and in vitro infectivity
BALB/c mice (n = 8) subcutaneously infected with L. amazonensis were monitored for 8 weeks by measuring the footpad thickness, given that the footpad swelling was similar in all evaluated animals (Figure 1A). The number of parasites recovered in the infected footpads, spleen, and liver of the infected animals was evaluated, and the results showed values of 8.6±0.5, 5.9±0.6, and 4.9±0.6 log, respectively (Figure 1B). In this context and due to the high homogeneity of infections in the mice, represented by similar values of footpad swelling and parasite loads, the parasites were recovered from lesions and used in the axenic cultures to perform the proteomic analyses of this study.
To evaluate the variation of the in vivo infectivity between the different passages of L. amazonensis, stationary promastigotes obtained from R0 and R30 samples were used to infect BALB/c mice (n = 8 per group, with 1×106 stationary promastigotes injected in each mouse). Animals infected with R30, as compared to the animals infected with R0, presented a significantly lower edema in the infected footpads at 8 weeks after infection (Figure 1C). The lower lesion size observed in the R30 group, when compared to the values obtained in the R0 group, was related to the lower parasite load observed when evaluating the infected footpads, spleen, and liver of these animals (Figure 1D).
For the evaluation of the in vitro infectivity, stationary promastigotes recovered in all passages (R0, R10, R20, and R30) were quantified and employed in the experiments. It could be observed that by using 2 parasites to infect 1 macrophage, parasites obtained from the R0 passage presented an infection average of 65.1±1.5% and a number of amastigotes per macrophage of 2.2±0.1. By contrast, using the R30 sample, the infection average was 14.9±2.3% and the number of amastigotes per macrophage was 0.5±0.1. When 10 parasites were used to infect 1 macrophage, the infection average of the R0 group was 96.9±2.6% and the number of amastigotes per macrophage was 7.4±0.4. On the other hand, using parasites from the R30 group, the infection average was 59.5±2.2% and the number of amastigotes per macrophage was 3.8±0.4 (Table 1).
Table 1. Evaluation of in vitro infection.
Ratio | Percentage of infected macrophages | |||
R0 | R10 | R20 | R30 | |
1∶2 | 65.1±1.5 | 37.8±3.2 | 19.2±3.6 | 14.9±2.3 |
1∶10 | 96.9±2.6 | 82.8±1.4 | 64.1±2.5 | 59.5±2.2 |
Murine macrophages (5×105 cells) were infected with stationary promastigotes of L. amazonensis (1×106 and 5×106, by a ratio of 1∶2 or 1∶10 macrophage per parasites, respectively) and the cultures were incubated for 24 h at 37°C, 5% CO2. Next, free parasites were removed and the percentage of infected cells and the number of amastigotes per macrophage in each passage (R0, R10, R20, and R30) were analyzed by counting 200 cells in triplicate. Mean ± SD is shown. Data shown are representative of three separate experiments, performed in triplicate, which presented similar results.
Analyses of protein expression in Leishmania amazonensis
Electrofocusing was performed using 13 cm pH 4–7 IPG strips after having investigated the best strip to isolate the total extracts. Strips of 13 cm were chosen because they provide a better range of separation of proteins by their pI without the gels becoming difficult to handling. Two ranges of pH were evaluated: 3–10 and 4–7. This study opted for a narrower pH range, given that most of the identified spots were located in this region. Although some spots located outside the pH 4–7 have been missed, the most spots were obtained within of this range due a better separation. After 2-DE gels had been applied, approximately 837 spots were found in the R0 sample, while 967, 935, and 872 spots were identified in the R10, R20, and R30 samples, respectively. Figure 2 is representative of the gels obtained in each condition. The 2-DE profiles and the number of observed spots in the different passages were reproducible in terms of both the total number of protein spots and their relative positions and intensities in four 2-DE gels performed for each passage (data not shown). After 2-DE analysis, 315 spots, which presented a significant variation in their intensities, were selected for identification by mass spectrometry. From all these spots, 258 were identified as proteins, and 164 unique proteins were identified. Of these, 58 proteins showed that the intensity of their corresponding spots either increased (19 spots) or decreased (37 spots) during the passages from R0 to R30, always maintaining a 2-fold minimal variation. It is also important to report that, upon performing the in vitro infection experiments, a stabilization of the infectivity could be observed between the R20 and R30 samples (Table 1).
Identification of proteins of interest
Among the 37 proteins that presented a significant decrease in their content during the axenic passages, six were hypothetical, while another 31 were known proteins, like described in Table 2 [22]–[52]. Some of these proteins present biological functions described in prior literature, such as tryparedoxin peroxidase [25], metallo-peptidases [29], heat shock protein HSP70 [33], and protein disulfide isomerase [48], all of which are involved with the parasites' infectivity. Possible targets for therapeutic interventions, such as S-adenosylmethionine synthetase [47]; proteins identified as diagnosis candidates, such as acidic ribosomal protein P2; and vaccine candidates, such as the eukaryotic initiation factor 4A [34] and thiol-dependent reductase 1 [52], were also identified. Proteins involved in the flagellum motility in Leishmania, such as a small myristoylated protein [22], and others related to metabolic functions, such as aldehyde dehydrogenase [28], were also identified. Evaluating the proteins that presented a significant increase in their content, including one hypothetical and 18 known proteins, could be identified. Data are showed in Table 3 [53]–[70]. In relation to known proteins, the majority are commonly involved in the parasites' metabolism, such as nucleosome assembly proteins [57], 6-phosphogluconolactonase [62], and rieske iron sulfur proteins [66], while others, such as mannose-1-phosphate guanyltransferase [56] and short chain dehydrogenase [65], have been employed as candidates for immunotherapeutic targets.
Table 2. Identification of proteins that presented a significant decrease in their expression content.
Mascot search results | Normalized valuesh | |||||||||||||
Match IDa | Identificationb | Uniprot IDc | pI (pred/exp)d | Mr (pred/exp)e | No. match peptidef | Coverage (%)g | R0 | R10 | R20 | R30 | Foldi | One-way ANOVA (P value)j | Functionk | Literaturel |
116 | Hypothetical protein | E9AVJ0 | 4.65/5.63 | 12/55 | 4(1) | 1 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.60 | 0.46 | 2.18 | 7,24E-04 | Unknown | Unknown |
141 | Hypothetical protein | E9ANW9 | 4.90/4.84 | 15/18 | 2(2) | 8 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.59 | 0.48 | 2.09 | 6,91E-03 | Unknown | Unknown |
142 | Small myristoylated protein-3 | E9APT0 | 4.51/4.70 | 15/13 | 6(4) | 32 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.48 | 0.46 | 2.18 | 7,97E-07 | Unknown | Infectivity [22] |
169 | Small GTP-binding protein Rab1 | E9AYX8 | 5.36/5.54 | 19/22 | 12(8) | 60 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.50 | 0.32 | 3.13 | 4,95E-03 | Transport | Infectivity [23] |
184 | Peroxidoxin | E9AW04 | 6.27/6.90 | 20/26 | 2(2) | 6 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 2.38 | 3,24E-03 | Metabolism | Vaccine [24] |
185 | Tryparedoxin Peroxidase I | Q4QF76 | 6.19/6.79 | 20/25 | 13(10) | 21 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.56 | 0.48 | 2.09 | 3,08E-03 | Metabolism | Infectivity [25] |
260 | Succinyl-CoA ligase [GDP-forming] beta-chain,putative | E9AT73 | 5.44/6.77 | 28/45 | 6(4) | 12 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.63 | 0.38 | 2.63 | 4,90E-03 | Metabolism | Infectivity [26] |
291 | α-tubulin | E9AP62 | 5.33/5.45 | 31/61 | 24(22) | 31 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.58 | 0.47 | 2.13 | 7,89E-06 | Structural | Infectivity [27] |
312 | Aldehyde dehydrogenase | E9AXJ1 | 6.67/7.52 | 34/55 | 2(1) | 11 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.43 | 0.43 | 2.33 | 2,24E-05 | Metabolism | Metabolism [28] |
336 | Metallo-peptidase, Clan MA(E), Family M32 | E9B493 | 5.26/5.51 | 36/57 | 19(8) | 23 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.59 | 0.44 | 2.27 | 3,67E-06 | Protein synthesis | Infectivity [29] |
388 | Paraflagellar rod protein 1D | E9ALP7 | 5.34/5.36 | 44/69 | 12(7) | 16 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.62 | 0.37 | 2.71 | 1,52E-04 | Structural | Infectivity [30] |
412 | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit 8 | E9AUD5 | 4.05/5.64 | 48/82 | 4(3) | 4 | 1.00 | 0.44 | 0.37 | 0.27 | 3.70 | 4,87E-03 | Protein synthesis | Metabolism [31] |
615 | Hypothetical protein | E9ASM0 | 6.61/7.09 | 27/147 | 1(1) | 0 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.63 | 0.37 | 2.71 | 9,05E-03 | Unknown | Unknown |
640 | Actin | P45520 | 5.85/5.40 | 34/42 | 4(2) | 13 | 1.00 | 0.51 | 0.40 | 0.18 | 5.56 | 6,49E-03 | Structural | Metabolism [32] |
646 | Heat shock 70 kDa protein | Q07437 | 4.88/6.05 | 39/45 | 13(11) | 14 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.40 | 0.37 | 2.71 | 1,56E-03 | Protein folding | Infectivity [33] |
653 | Eukaryotic initiation factor 4A | O62591 | 4.65/5.83 | 42/45 | 8(4) | 13 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.85 | 0.38 | 2.63 | 9,39E-03 | Protein synthesis | Vaccine [34] |
656 | Paraflagellar rod protein 2C | E9AQV6 | 5.18/5.73 | 43/77 | 4(1) | 5 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.37 | 0.43 | 2.71 | 1,57E-04 | Structural | Infectivity [35] |
697 | Hypothetical protein | E9B489 | 5.27/5.36 | 25/36 | 1(1) | 4 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.55 | 0.41 | 2.44 | 1,47E-03 | Unknown | Unknown |
776 | Enolase | E9APW3 | 5.80/5.48 | 30/47 | 4(3) | 13 | 1.00 | 0.58 | 0.45 | 0.36 | 2.78 | 9,87E-04 | Metabolism | Infectivity [36] |
69 | Glutamine synthetase | E9AKR5 | 5.81/5.71 | 38/43 | 4(3) | 12 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.50 | 0.47 | 2.13 | 2,29E-05 | Metabolism | Vaccine [37] |
76 | Malic enzyme | E9AWR7 | 5.01/5.79 | 39/63 | 13(8) | 18 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.32 | 0.27 | 3.70 | 2,85E-04 | Metabolism | Vaccine [38] |
77 | Putative phosphatase 2C | E9B0G2 | 4.96/4.93 | 41/43 | 8(7) | 20 | 1.00 | 0.51 | 0.38 | 0.33 | 3.03 | 1,22E-03 | Cell signaling | Infectivity [39] |
107 | Elongation factor 2 | E9ASD6 | 6.03/5.77 | 12/95 | 1(1) | 1 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.58 | 0.48 | 2.08 | 5,56E-03 | Protein synthesis | Vaccine [40] |
125 | Endoribonuclease L-PSP (pb5) | E9AW21 | 5.86/5.52 | 13/17 | 2(2) | 9 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.45 | 0.40 | 2.50 | 1,98E-03 | DNA binding protein | Therapeutic [41] |
149 | Ribonucleoprotein p18 | E9AQ29 | 5.09/5.55 | 16/22 | 4(0) | 15 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.44 | 0.50 | 2.27 | 2,12E-04 | DNA binding protein | Metabolism [42] |
210 | Hypothetical protein | E9AXT3 | 5.64/5.64 | 23/31 | 13(9) | 29 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.50 | 0.58 | 2.04 | 1,10E-04 | Unknown | Unknown |
211 | Hypothetical protein | E9B549 | 4.37/9.90 | 23/23 | 5(5) | 25 | 1.00 | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.58 | 2.08 | 1,56E-03 | Unknown | Unknown |
235 | Metallo-peptidase, Clan ME, Family M16 | E9B2A8 | 6.64/5.06 | 25/120 | 1(1) | 1 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.47 | 0.55 | 2.22 | 1,43E-04 | Protein synthesis | Infectivity [43] |
239 | β-tubulin | E9AMJ8 | 4.61/5.95 | 25/47 | 20(15) | 32 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.42 | 0.47 | 2.38 | 2,64E-05 | Structural | Infectivity [44] |
262 | Chain A, Open And Closed Structures Of The Udp-Glucose Pyrophosphorylase From Leishmania Major | Q4QDU3 | 4.92/5.84 | 28/56 | 2(1) | 2 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.49 | 0.42 | 2.38 | 8,46E-03 | Metabolism | Metabolism [45] |
296 | Peptidase m20/m25/m40 family-like protein | E9B1Y8 | 5.04/5.10 | 32/38 | 5(5) | 15 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.49 | 0.45 | 2.04 | 5,10E-04 | Protein synthesis | Metabolism [46] |
308 | S-adenosylmethionine synthetase | E9B1C6 | 5.12/5.42 | 34/44 | 9(5) | 16 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.58 | 0.49 | 2.04 | 3,36E-03 | Metabolism | Metabolism [47] |
381 | Protein disulfide isomerase | E9AUD1 | 5.06/5.04 | 42/53 | 12(7) | 22 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.44 | 0.41 | 2.44 | 1,05E-03 | Metabolism | Infectivity [48] |
519 | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit | E9ATH0 | 5.14/5.21 | 35/39 | 7(5) | 14 | 1.00 | 0.42 | 0.32 | 0.22 | 4.55 | 2,13E-10 | Protein synthesis | Metabolism [49] |
584 | Basic transcription factor 3a | E9ATF9 | 4.00/9.44 | 13/12 | 1(1) | 15 | 1.00 | 0.37 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 3.85 | 6,69E-04 | Protein synthesis | Metabolism [50] |
586 | 60S acidic ribosomal protein P2-2 | Q06382 | 4.04/4.23 | 13/11 | 8(8) | 52 | 1.00 | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.26 | 3.85 | 2,51E-03 | Protein synthesis | Infectivity [51] |
606 | Thiol-dependent reductase 1 | E9B3K3 | 6.38/5.65 | 24/46 | 3(2) | 12 | 1.00 | 0.38 | 0.27 | 0.22 | 4.55 | 1,71E-05 | Unknown | Vaccine [52] |
) Spots match ID number obtained from ImageMaster Platinum;
) Name of the identified protein;
) Uniprot identification code;
) Experimentally predicted and expected isoelectric point (pI);
) Experimentally predicted and expected molecular weight (Mr, in kDa);
) Number of identified peptides by MS;
) Percentage of the protein sequence covered by identified peptides;
) Normalized data from R0 represented by mean values of each condition divided by R30 value;
) Fold represents the maximum spot intensity mean value of the conditions divided by the smallest value;
) One-way ANOVA (P<0.01) obtained from spot analysis;
) Biological functions according to NCBI, UniProt, and Gene Ontology databases;
) Biological activity and/or immunological application described in other studies: [22] Tull et al., 2010; [23] Oliveira et al., 2006; [24] Daifalla et al., 2011; [25] Iyer et al., 2008; [26] Hunger-Glaser et al., 1999; [27] Werbovetz et al., 1999; [28] Feng et al., 2011; [29] Niemirowicz et al., 2007; [30] Hunger-Glaser et al., 1997; [31] Alcolea et al., 2009; [32] Bhaskar et al., 2012; [33] Khanra et al., 2012; [34] Berberich et al., 2003; [35] Moore et al., 1996; [36] Swenerton et al., 2011; [37] Hummadi et al., 2006; [38] Martins et al., 2006; [39] Burns et al., 1993; [40] Kushawaha et al., 2011; [41] Misra et al., 2005; [42] Bringaud et al., 1995; [43] Eggleson et al., 1999; [44] Mureev et al., 2007; [45] Steiner et al., 2007; [46] Martínez-Rodríguez et al., 2012; [47] Drummelsmith et al., 2004; [48] Achour et al., 2002; [49] Buda et al., 2013; [50] Alcolea et al., 2011; [51] Martín et al., 2009; [52] Silva et al., 2012. The proteins were identified through the data included in the NCBI database (dated June 2012) for Leishmania spp.
Table 3. Identification of proteins that presented a significant increase in their expression content.
Mascot search results | Normalized valuesh | |||||||||||||
Match IDa | Identificationb | Uniprot IDc | pI (pred/exp)d | Mr (pred/exp)e | No. match peptidef | Coverage (%)g | R0 | R10 | R20 | R30 | Foldi | One-way ANOVA (P value)j | Functionk | Literaturel |
8 | Calreticulin | E9B259 | 4.52/4.51 | 50/45 | 3(3) | 5 | 1.00 | 3.26 | 4.40 | 4.49 | 4.49 | 6.96E-03 | Protein folding | Metabolism [53] |
12 | Isocitrate dehydrogenase | E9B494 | 5.44/5.51 | 40/47 | 16(6) | 28 | 1.00 | 1.71 | 1.76 | 2.51 | 2.51 | 2.41E-03 | Metabolism | Metabolism [54] |
303 | 60S acidic ribosomal subunit protein | E8NHJ8 | 5.07/5.00 | 33/35 | 26(21) | 45 | 1.00 | 3.15 | 4.72 | 4.75 | 4.75 | 9.76E-05 | Protein synthesis | Diagnosis [55] |
326 | Mannose-1-phosphate guanyltransferase | E9AW11 | 5.67/5.29 | 36/42 | 10(7) | 23 | 1.00 | 2.07 | 2.25 | 3.24 | 3.24 | 1.72E-04 | Metabolism | Metabolism [56] |
392 | Nucleosome assembly protein | E9ARZ6 | 4.64/4.64 | 45/40 | 17(9) | 25 | 1.00 | 2.17 | 2.49 | 2.61 | 2.61 | 1.78E-04 | DNA binding protein | Metabolism [57] |
420 | ATPase beta subunit | E9AXJ6 | 5.02/5.14 | 49/56 | 60(51) | 49 | 1.00 | 1.74 | 1.89 | 2.02 | 2.02 | 9.55E-04 | Metabolism | Metabolism [58] |
432 | T-complex protein 1, theta subunit | E9AUC7 | 5.27/5.24 | 54/59 | 27(18) | 49 | 1.00 | 1.54 | 2.05 | 3.35 | 3.35 | 3.65E-04 | Protein folding | Metabolism [59] |
458 | Chain A, Protein Structure Of Usp From L. Major in Apo-Form | D3G6S4 | 5.36/5.34 | 63/69 | 4(4) | 3 | 1.00 | 1.82 | 3.11 | 3.24 | 3.24 | 2.57E-03 | Metabolism | Metabolism [60] |
739 | Hs1vu complex proteolytic subunit-like,hs1vu complex proteolytic subunit-like, threonine peptidase, Clan T(1), family T1B | E9ATI1 | 5.24/6.09 | 22/25 | 4(1) | 9 | 1.00 | 1.65 | 1.87 | 2.05 | 2.05 | 3.70E-04 | Protein synthesis | Metabolism [61] |
767 | 6-phosphogluconolactonase | E9AYQ1 | 5.50/5.22 | 26/29 | 2(2) | 8 | 1.00 | 1.39 | 1.71 | 2.27 | 2.27 | 1.63E-03 | Metabolism | Metabolism [62] |
40 | Heat shock protein 83; HSP 83 | P27741 | 6.27/5.00 | 31/81 | 1(1) | 1 | 1.00 | 1.88 | 2.92 | 2.93 | 2.93 | 3.76E-03 | Protein folding | Diagnosis [63] |
62 | 2-hydroxy-3-oxopropionate reductase | E9B0E2 | 5.77/5.40 | 26/31 | 6(5) | 25 | 1.00 | 2.39 | 3.13 | 3.42 | 3.42 | 6.53E-05 | Metabolism | Metabolism [64] |
230 | Short chain dehydrogenase | E9B602 | 6.57/6.31 | 25/28 | 3(1) | 9 | 1.00 | 2.16 | 2.61 | 2.62 | 2.62 | 8.48E-04 | Metabolism | Therapeutic [65] |
279 | Reiske iron-sulfur protein precursor | E9B632 | 5.57/6.02 | 29/34 | 9(7) | 43 | 1.00 | 1.83 | 2.43 | 2.89 | 2.89 | 6.34E-06 | Metabolism | Metabolism [66] |
327 | Vacuolar ATPase subunit-like protein | E9AKM1 | 4.93/4.85 | 36/42 | 13(5) | 25 | 1.00 | 1.75 | 2.39 | 2.49 | 2.49 | 3.74E-03 | Metabolism | Metabolism [67] |
510 | Cyclin 1 | E9AMR1 | 5.99/5.67 | 31/36 | 3(1) | 13 | 1.00 | 2.26 | 2.28 | 2.78 | 2.78 | 8.78E-03 | Protein synthesis | Metabolism [68] |
529 | Protein transport protein Sec13 | E9B2C5 | 5.69/5.51 | 34/37 | 2(1) | 9 | 1.00 | 2.45 | 2.78 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 2.79E-03 | Unknown | Metabolism [69] |
676 | Hypothetical protein | E9ATK7 | 4.98/4.91 | 98/119 | 33(22) | 27 | 1.00 | 1.75 | 2.75 | 2.80 | 2.80 | 3.84E-03 | Unknown | Unknown |
735 | Glucose-regulated protein 78; GRP78 | E9AZT9 | 5.15/5.18 | 67/72 | 27(22) | 28 | 1.00 | 4.69 | 4.84 | 4.87 | 4.87 | 9.57E-05 | Protein folding | Vaccine [70] |
) Spots match ID number obtained from ImageMaster Platinum;
) Name of the identified protein;
) Uniprot identification code;
) Experimentally predicted and expected isoelectric point (pI);
) Experimentally predicted and expected molecular weight (Mr, in kDa);
) Number of identified peptides by MS;
) Percentage of the protein sequence covered by identified peptides;
) Normalized data from R0 represented by mean values of each condition divided by R30 value;
) Fold represents the maximum spot intensity mean value of the conditions divided by the smallest value;
) One-way ANOVA (P<0.01) obtained from spot analysis;
) Biological functions according to NCBI, UniProt, and Gene Ontology databases;
) Biological activity and/or immunological application described in other studies: [53] Joshi et al., 1996; [54] Tielens et al., 2010; [55] Soto et al., 1996; [56] Lackovic et al., 2010; [57] Scher et al., 2012; [58] Sánchez-Cañete et al., 2009; [59] Peris et al., 1994; [60] Steiner et al., 2007; [61] Jaramillo et al., 2011; [62] Duclert-Savatier et al., 2009; [63] Celeste et al., 2004; [64] Liu et al., 2011; [65] Leblanc et al., 1998; [66] Priest et al., 1996; [67] Bakker-Grunwald, 1992; [68] Banerjee et al., 2006; [69] Casanova et al., 2008; [70] Jensen et al., 2001. The proteins were identified through the data included in the NCBI database (dated June 2012) for Leishmania spp.
Immunoblotting validation
Some of the identified proteins that presented a significant increase or decrease in their contents in the axenic cultures were used to validate the results found in this study. In this context, two of them presenting a significant decrease in their expression content, namely α-tubulin and paraflagellar rod protein 1D, and two of them, which presented an increase in their expression, namely HSP83 and GRP78, were used in the Western blot experiments (Figure 3). When promastigote extracts were employed, the selected proteins showed a variation that runs in line with the results obtained in the 2-DE gels. In addition, the decrease in the level of α-tubulin and paraflagellar rod protein 1D detected in the promastigote forms are also maintained when the R30 forms are axenically derived into the amastigote stage of the parasite.
Discussion
Leishmania amazonensis is a member of the Leishmania mexicana complex, and it is the etiological agent for a broad spectrum of disease in South American countries [5]. The mechanisms of in vivo persistence are of particular interest to this parasite species, given that several lines indicate that L. amazonensis, when compared to other Leishmania species, is particularly adept at surviving attacks from intracellular killing mechanisms [5], [14]. Taking this into account, the present study applied a proteomic approach to analyze the variation of the protein expression profile from L. amazonensis, which was pre-isolated from lesions of chronically infected BALB/c mice and maintained in in vitro cultures over a long period of time. The purpose of this study was to verify whether or not the in vitro cultivation, performed over a 150-day period, could in fact decrease the parasites' infectivity, as well as to identify proteins that could present a relation with a possible loss of infectivity in L. amazonensis.
Studies have shown that the maintenance of Leishmania in axenic cultures over long periods of time constitutes a relevant factor in the reduction of infectivity in L. infantum [71] and L. major [72]. In one study, the loss of infectivity in L. infantum was related to the maintenance of the parasites after 105 days of successive in vitro passages [73]. Proteomic analyses have been employed successfully to identify proteins expressed in both promastigote and amastigote stages of Leishmania spp., as well as to evaluate the stage-specific proteins and protein expression profile in the parasites [8], [11], [74], [75], [76], [77]. In the present study, proteins that presented a significant variation in their content, observed using 2-DE gels and analyzed by bioinformatics programs, were identified in an attempt to select possible targets for future immunological interventions in leishmaniasis. For this, stationary promastigotes were used in the same concentration in all passages so as to perform the experiments properly. In general, an increase of Leishmania promastigote infectivity can also be observed when parasites pass from the logarithmic phase (days 1–3) to the stationary phase (days 4–6) of their growth cycle in in vitro cultures [78], [79], [80], [81]. In the present study, it could be observed that the percentage of the stationary promastigotes found in all cultures was homogeneous, suggesting that the changes found in the protein expression profile and in the infectivity values of the parasites submitted to axenic cultures, could not only be associated with or depend on the reduction in the number of infective promastigotes present in the in vitro cultures.
Another important aspect here was the reduction in the in vitro and in vivo infectivity observed from R0 to R30 samples. In the in vitro experiments performed using murine macrophages, in addition to a significant decrease found in the percentage of infected macrophages, a marked reduction in the number of intracellular amastigotes could be observed. Evaluating in vitro cultures performed up to 300 days after infection (R60), as compared to R30, no significant difference was found in the percentage of infected macrophages, and in the number of intra-macrophage amastigotes (data not shown). In addition, when R0 and R30 cultures were used to infect BALB/c mice, it could be observed that animals infected with R0 developed a more progressive disease than did those infected with the R30 sample, confirming the results obtained from in vitro experiments, though no significant difference could be observed between R20 and R30 in the infectivity experiments. Furthermore, the present study's data are in accordance with Moreira et al. (2012), which showed that L. infantum promastigotes present a significant loss of their infectivity after 100 days of in vitro cultures, suggesting that this condition may well be related to specific modifications in the protein differentiation content of parasites [73].
In relation to the identified proteins that presented a decreased expression from R0 to R30, several had already been described in other published studies, such as proteins involved in the infectivity of Leishmania or in other parasite species. For example, peroxidoxin is a protein expressed in the endoplasmic reticulum of Trypanosomatides and is involved in cellular resistance to reactive oxygen species [82], been also a virulence factor described in Trypanosoma cruzi [83]. The malic enzyme is involved in the virulence of Xanthomonas campestris [84], while aldehyde dehydrogenase acts in the protection of mammal cells against damage evoked by osmotic and saline stress [85]. S-adenosylmethionine synthetase in L. panamensis [86] and L. major [87] is related to drug resistance. Enolase is a membrane protein that plays a role in the infectivity of Leishmania, as it is involved in the interaction between the parasites and host cells [88]. The carboxypeptidase family (M32) has also been identified as a virulence factor in T. cruzi [89] and operates in the catabolism of peptides, favoring the growth and multiplication of parasites [90]. Phosphatase 2C is considered a virulence factor in Toxoplasma gondii [91], while tryparedoxin peroxidase in L. donovani is involved in drug resistance [92].
Evaluating the databases of proteins that presented an increased expression from R0 to R30, most present metabolic functions described in prior literature, such as those related to cellular stress, recovery of improperly folded proteins, and the restoration of core functions. In this context, phosphatase 1 guanyltransferase mannose is involved in oxidative stress in yeast [93], while isocitrate dehydrogenase is involved in cellular stress in Cryptococcus neoformans [94]. The glucose regulated protein 78 kDa is a membrane protein that is up-regulated in conditions of cellular stress and that can lead to cell cycle arrest [95]. The protein complex Hs1VU-like proteolytic subunit is a peptidase that is over-expressed and correlated to the accumulation of improperly folded proteins within the cells [96]. Calreticulin is involved in cellular processes related to protein folding, calcium homeostasis, apoptosis, and cell differentiation [97].
Western blot assays with four identified proteins were performed to validate 2-DE gel quantification results. When promastigote samples were analyzed, a significant correlation could be observed when comparing the two techniques used for proteins with a decreased or increased expression in aged cultures (Figure 3). When axenic amastigote extracts were employed for Western blots, a decrease in the level of α-tubulin and paraflagellar rod protein 1D observed in the 2-DE was also detected. Unfortunately, the lack of signs when antibodies against HSP83 and GRP78 were employed made it impossible to confirm whether or not the increase in protein expression associated with the loss of infectivity is maintained in the amastigote forms.
In conclusion, the data presented in the present study could contribute to a better understanding of the biological processes involved in a possible loss of infectivity of L. amazonensis when submitted to in vitro cultures over a long period of time, as described for other Leishmania species. Furthermore, the identified proteins presenting a significant decrease in their protein content during cultivation, including the hypothetical, should be evaluated in future studies, including vaccine candidates and/or immunotherapeutic targets against leishmaniasis. Additional studies are warranted in an attempt to address the major concern that identified proteins are indeed involved in the possible loss of virulence in the parasites cultured over long periods of time.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank to the Mass Spectrometry Laboratory of the Brazilian Biosciences National Laboratory to the Mass Spectrometry Laboratory (LNBio, CNPEM/ABTLuS, Campinas, Brazil) for its support in the mass spectrometry experiments, as well as to Dra Daniela Castanheira Bartholomeu (Department of Parasitology, UFMG), for providing the antibodies employed in the immunoblotting experiments.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by grants from Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa of UFMG (Edital 03/2013), Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Nano-Biofarmacêutica, FAPEMIG (CBB-APQ-00496-11 and CBB-APQ-00819-12), and CNPq (472090/2011-9 and 482976/2012-8). EAFC is a grant recipient of CNPq. MACF is a grant recipient of PNPD/CAPES. This study was also, in part, supported in Spain by grants from Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación FIS/PI1100095. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.World Health Organization (2010) Control of the Leishmaniasis: report of a meeting of the WHO Expert Committee on the Control of Leishmaniases, Geneva, 22–26 March 2010. Available: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_949_eng.pdf. 2010 Accessed 15 June 2013.
- 2. Garcez LM, Goto H, Ramos PK, Brigido MC, Gomes PAF, et al. (2002) Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis-induced cutaneous leishmaniasis in the primate Cebus apella: a model for vaccine trials. Int J Parasitol 32: 1755–1764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Barral A, Pedral-Sampaio D, Momen H, Mc Mahon-Pratt D, Jesus AR, et al. (1991) Leishmaniasis in Bahia, Brazil: evidence that Leishmania amazonensis produces a wide spectrum of clinical disease. Am J Trop Med Hyg 44: 536–546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Abreu-Silva AL, Calabrese KS, Cupolilo SMN, Cardoso FO, Souza CSF, et al. (2004) Histopathological studies of visceralized Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis in mice experimentally infected. Vet Parasitol 121: 179–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Grimaldi JrG, Tesh RB (1993) Leishmaniasis of the New World: current concepts and implications for future research. Clin Microbiol Rev 6: 230–250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Mitchell GF, Handman E, Spithill TW (1984) Vaccination against cutaneous leishmaniasis in mice using nonpathogenic cloned promastigotes of Leishmania major and importance of route of injection. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci 62: 145–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Hadighi R, Mohebali M, Boucher P, Hajjaran H, Khamesipour A, et al. (2006) Unresponsiveness to Glucantime treatment in Iranian cutaneous leishmaniasis due to drug-resistant Leishmania tropica parasites. PLoS Med 3: e162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Coelho VTS, Oliveira JS, Valadares DG, Duarte MC, Chávez-Fumagalli MA, et al. (2012) Identification of proteins in promastigote and amastigote-like Leishmania using an immunoproteomic approach. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6: e1430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Drummelsmith J, Brochu V, Girard I, Messier N, Ouellette M (2003) Proteome mapping of the protozoan parasite Leishmania and application to the study of drug targets and resistance mechanisms. Mol Cell Proteomics 2: 146–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Chenik M, Lakhal S, Ben Khalef N, Zribi L, Louzir H, et al. (2006) Approaches for the identification of potential excreted/secreted proteins of Leishmania major parasites. Parasitology 132: 493–509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Leifso K, Cohen-Freue G, Dogra N, Murray A, Mc Master WR (2007) Genomic and proteomic expression analysis of Leishmania promastigote and amastigote life stages: the Leishmania genome is constitutively expressed. Mol Biochem Parasitol 152: 35–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Morales MA, Watanabe R, Laurent C, Lenormand P, Rousselle JC, et al. (2008) Phosphoproteomic analysis of Leishmania donovani pro- and amastigote stages. Proteomics 8: 350–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Rosenzweig D, Smith D, Myler PJ, Olafson RW, Zilberstein D (2008) Post-translational modification of cellular proteins during Leishmania donovani differentiation. Proteomics 8: 1843–1850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Paape D, Barrios-Lerena ME, Le Bihan T, Mackay L, Aebischer T (2010) Gel free analysis of the proteome of intracellular Leishmania mexicana . Mol Biochem Parasitol 169: 108–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Costa CHN, Peters NC, Maruyama SR, Brito JrEC, Santos IKFM (2011) Vaccines for the leishmaniases: Proposals for a research agenda. The working group on research priorities for development of leishmaniasis vaccines. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5: e943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Doyle PS, Engel JC, Pimenta PFP, Silva PP, Dwyer DM (1991) Leishmania donovani: long-term culture of axenic amastigotes at 37°C. Exp Parasitol 73: 326–334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Coelho EA, Tavares CA, Carvalho FA, Chaves KF, Teixeira KN, et al. (2003) Immune responses induced by the Leishmania (Leishmania) donovani A2 antigen, but not by the LACK antigen, are protective against experimental Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis infection. Infect Immun 71: 3988–3994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Valadares DG, Duarte MC, Oliveira JS, Martins VT, Costa LE, et al. (2011) Leishmanicidal activity of the Agaricus blazei Murill in different Leishmania species. Parasitol Int 60: 357–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Lewis TS, Hunt JB, Aveline LD, Jonscher KR, Louie DF, et al. (2000) Identification of novel MAP kinase pathway signalling targets by functional proteomics and mass spectrometry. Mol Cell 6: 1343–1354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Neuhoff V, Arold N, Taube D, Ehrhardt W (1988) Improved staining of proteins in polyacrilamide gels including isoeletric focusing gels with clear background at nanogram sensitivity using Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 and R-250. Electrophoresis 9: 255–262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Tull D, Naderer T, Spurck T, Mertens HD, Heng J, et al. (2010) Membrane protein SMP-1 is required for normal flagellum function in Leishmania . J Cell Sci 123: 544–554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Oliveira AH, Ruiz JC, Cruz AK, Greene LJ, Rosa JC, et al. (2006) Subproteomic analysis of soluble proteins of the microsomal fraction from two Leishmania species. Comp Biochem Physiol Part D Genomics Proteomics 1: 300–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Daifalla NS, Bayih AG, Gedamu L (2011) Immunogenicity of Leishmania donovani iron superoxide dismutase B1 and peroxidoxin 4 in BALB/c mice: the contribution of toll-like receptor agonists as adjuvant. Exp Parasitol 129: 292–298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Iyer J P, Kaprakkaden A, Choudhary ML, Shaha C (2008) Crucial role of cytosolic tryparedoxin peroxidase in Leishmania donovani survival, drug response and virulence. Mol Microbiol 68: 372–391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Hunger-Glaser I, Brun R, Linder M Seebeck T (1999) Inhibition of succinyl CoA synthetase histidine-phosphorylation in Trypanosoma brucei by an inhibitor of bacterial two-component systems. Mol Biochem Parasitol 100: 53–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Werbovetz KA, Brendle JJ, Sackett DL (1999) Purification, characterization, and drug susceptibility of tubulin from Leishmania. . Mol Biochem Parasitol 98: 53–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Feng X, Feistel T, Buffalo C, Mc Cormack A, Kruvand E, et al. (2011) Remodeling of protein and mRNA expression in Leishmania mexicana induced by deletion of glucose transporter genes. Mol Biochem Parasitol 175: 39–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Niemirowicz G, Parussini F, Agüero F, Cazzulo JJ (2007) Two metallo carboxypeptidases from the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi belong to the M32 family, found so far only in prokaryotes. Biochem J 401: 399–410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Hunger-Glaser I, Seebeck T (1997) Deletion of the genes for the paraflagellar rod protein PFR-A in Trypanosoma brucei is probably lethal. Mol Biochem Parasitol 90: 347–351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Alcolea PJ, Alonso A, Sánchez-Gorostiaga A, Moreno-Paz M, Gómez MJ, et al. (2009) Genome-wide analysis reveals increased levels of transcripts related with infectivity in peanut lectin non-agglutinated promastigotes of Leishmania infantum . Genomics 93: 551–564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Bhaskar, Kumari N, Goyal N (2012) Cloning, characterization and sub-cellular localization of gamma subunit of T-complex protein-1 (chaperonin) from Leishmania donovani . Biochem Biophys Res Commun 429: 70–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Khanra S, Datta S, Mondal D, Saha P, Bandopadhyay SK, et al. (2012) RFLPs of ITS, ITS1 and hsp70 amplicons and sequencing of ITS1 of recent clinical isolates of Kala-azar from India and Bangladesh confirms the association of Leishmania tropica with the disease. Acta Trop 124: 229–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Berberich C, Ramírez-Pineda JR, Hambrecht C, Alber G, Skeiky YA, et al. (2003) Dendritic cell (DC)-based protection against an intracellular pathogen is dependent upon DC-derived IL-12 and can be induced by molecularly defined antigens. J Immunol 170: 3171–3179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Moore LL, Santrich C, LeBowitz JH (1996) Stage-specific expression of the Leishmania mexicana paraflagellar rod protein PFR-2. Mol Biochem Parasitol 80: 125–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Swenerton RK, Zhang S, Sajid M, Medzihradszky KF, Craik CS, et al. (2011) The oligopeptidase B of Leishmania regulates parasite enolase and immune evasion. J Biol Chem 286: 429–440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Hummadi YM, Al-Bashir NM, Najim RA (2006) Leishmania major and Leishmania tropica: II. Effect of an immunomodulator, S(2) complex on the enzymes of the parasites. Exp Parasitol 112: 85–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Martins DRA, Jeronimo SMB, Donelson JE, Wilson ME (2006) Leishmania chagasi T-cell antigens identified through a double library screen. Infect Immun 74: 6940–6948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Burns JM Jr, Parsons M, Rosman DE, Reed SG (1993) Molecular cloning and characterization of a 42 kDa protein phosphatase of Leishmania chagasi . J Biol Chem 268: 17155–17161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Kushawaha PK, Gupta R, Sundar S, Sahasrabuddhe AA, Dube A (2011) Elongation factor-2, a Th1 stimulatory protein of Leishmania donovani, generates strong IFN-γ and IL-12 response in cured Leishmania-infected patients/hamsters and protects hamsters against Leishmania challenge. J Immunol 187: 6417–6427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Misra S, Bennett J, Friew YN, Abdulghani J, Irvin-Wilson CV, et al. (2005) A type II ribonuclease H from Leishmania mitochondria: an enzyme essential for the growth of the parasite. Mol and Biochem Parasitol 143: 135–145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Bringaud F, Peris M, Zen KH, Simpson L (1995) Characterization of two nuclear-encoded protein components of mitochondrial ribonucleoprotein complexes from Leishmania tarentolae . Mol Biochem Parasitol 71: 65–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Eggleson KK, Duffin KL, Goldberg DE (1999) Identification and characterization of falcilysin, a metallopeptidase involved in hemoglobin catabolism within the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum . J Biol Chem 274: 32411–32417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Mureev S, Kushnir S, Kolesnikov AA, Breitling R, Alexandrov K (2007) Construction and analysis of Leishmania tarentolae transgenic strains free of selection markers. Mol Biochem Parasitol 155: 71–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Steiner T, Lamerz AC, Hess P, Breithaupt C, Krapp S, et al. (2007) Open and closed structures of the UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase from Leishmania major . J Biol Chem 282: 13003–13010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Martínez-Rodríguez S, García-Pino A, Heras-Vázquez FJ, Clemente-Jiménez JM, Rodríguez-Vico F, et al. (2012) Mutational and structural analysis of L-N-carbamoylase reveals new insights into a peptidase M20/M25/M40 family member. J Bacteriol 194: 5759–5768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Drummelsmith J, Girard I, Trudel N, Ouellette M (2004) Differential protein expression analysis of Leishmania major reveals novel roles for methionine adenosyltransferase and S-adenosylmethionine in methotrexate resistance. J Biol Chem 279: 33273–33280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Achour YB, Chenik M, Louzir H, Dellagi K (2002) Identification of a disulfide isomerase protein of Leishmania major as a putative virulence factor. Infect Immun 70: 3576–3585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Buda P, Reinbothe T, Nagaraj V, Mahdi T, Luan C, et al. (2013) Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit e controls intracellular calcium homeostasis by regulation of cav1.2 surface expression. PLoS One 8: e64462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Alcolea PJ, Alonso A, Larraga V (2011) Genome-wide gene expression profile induced by exposure to cadmium acetate in Leishmania infantum promastigotes. Int Microbiol 14: 1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Martín OA, Villegas ME, Aguilar CF (2009) Three-dimensional studies of pathogenic peptides from the c-terminal of Trypanosoma cruzi ribosomal P proteins and their interaction with a monoclonal antibody structural model. PMC Biophys 2: 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Silva AM, Tavares J, Silvestre R, Ouaissi A, Coombs GH, et al. (2012) Characterization of Leishmania infantum thiol-dependent reductase 1 and evaluation of its potential to induce immune protection. Parasite Immunol 34: 345–350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Joshi M, Pogue GP, Duncan RC, Lee NS, Singh NK, et al. (1996) Isolation and characterization of Leishmania donovani calreticulin gene and its conservation of the RNA binding activity. Mol Biochem Parasitol 81: 53–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Tielens AG, Van Grinsven KW, Henze K, Van Hellemond JJ, Martin W (2010) Acetate formation in the energy metabolism of parasitic helminths and protists. Int J Parasitol 40: 387–397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Soto M, Requena JM, Quijada L, Alonso C (1996) Specific serodiagnosis of human leishmaniasis with recombinant Leishmania P2 acidic ribosomal proteins. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 3: 387–391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Lackovic K, Parisot JP, Sleebs N, Baell JB, Debien L, et al. (2010) Inhibitors of Leishmania GDP-mannose pyrophosphorylase identified by high-throughput screening of small-molecule chemical library. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54: 1712–1719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Scher R, Garcia JB, Pascoalino B, Schenkman S, Cruz AK (2012) Characterization of anti-silencing factor 1 in Leishmania major . Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 107: 377–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Sánchez-Cañete MP, Carvalho L, Pérez-Victoria FJ, Gamarro F, Castanys S (2009) Low plasma membrane expression of the miltefosine transport complex renders Leishmania braziliensis refractory to the drug. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53: 1305–1313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Peris M, Frech GC, Simpson AM, Bringaud F, Byrne E, et al. (1994) Characterization of two classes of ribonucleoprotein complexes possibly involved in RNA editing from Leishmania tarentolae mitochondria. EMBO J l 13: 1664–1672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Steiner T, Lamerz AC, Hess P, Breithaupt C, Krapp S, et al. (2007) Open and Closed Structures of the UDP-glucose Pyrophosphorylase from Leishmania major . J Biol Chem 282: 13003–13010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Jaramillo M, Gomez MA, Larsson O, Shio MT, Topisirovic I, et al. (2011) Leishmania repression of host translation through mTOR cleavage is required for parasite survival and infection. Cell Host Microbe 9: 331–341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Duclert-Savatier N, Poggi L, Miclet E, Lopes P, Ouazzani J, et al. (2009) Insights into the enzymatic mechanism of 6-phosphogluconolactonase from Trypanosoma brucei using structural data and molecular dynamics simulation. J Mol Biol 388: 1009–1021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Celeste BJ, Angel SO, Castro LGM, Gidlund M, Goto H (2004) Leishmania infantum heat shock protein 83 for the serodiagnosis of tegumentary leishmaniasis. Braz J Med Biol Res 37: 1591–1593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Liu Y, Koh CMJ, Sun L, Ji L (2011) Tartronate semialdehyde reductase defines a novel rate-limiting step in assimilation and bioconversion of glycerol in Ustilago maydis . PLoS One 6: e16438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Leblanc E, Papadopoulou B, Bernatchez C, Ouellette M (1998) Residues involved in co-factor and substrate binding of the short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase PTR1 producing methotrexate resistance in Leishmania . Eur J Biochem 251: 768–774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Priest JW, Hajduk SL (1996) In vitro import of the rieske iron-sulfur protein by trypanosome mitocondria. J Biol Chem 271: 20060–20069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Bakker-Grunwald T (1992) Ion transport in parasitic protozoa. J Exp Biol 172: 311–322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Banerjee S, Sen A, Das P, Saha P (2006) Leishmania donovani cyclin 1 (LdCyc1) forms a complex with cell cycle kinase subunit CRK3 (LdCRK3) and is possibly involved in S-phase-related activities. FEMS Microbiol Lett 256: 75–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Casanova M, Portalès P, Blaineau C, Crobu L, Bastien P, et al. (2008) Inhibition of active nuclear transport is an intrinsic trigger of programmed cell death in trypanosomatids. Cell Death Differ 15: 1910–1920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Jensen AT, Curtis J, Montgomery J, Handman E, Theander TG (2001) Molecular and immunological characterisation of the glucose regulated protein 78 of Leishmania donovani . Biochim Biophys Acta 1549: 73–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Grimm F, Brun R, Jenni L (1991) Promastigote infectivity in Leishmania infantum. . Parasitol Res 77: 185–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Segovia M, Artero JM, Mellado E, Chance ML (1992) Effects of long-term in vitro cultivation on the virulence of cloned lines of Leishmania major promastigotes. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 86: 347–354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Moreira D, Santarém N, Loureiro I, Tavares J, Silva AM, et al. (2012) Impact of continuous axenic cultivation in Leishmania infantum virulence. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6: e1469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Pawar H, Sahasrabuddhe NA, Renuse S, Keerthikumar S, Sharma J, et al. (2012) A proteogenomic approach to map the proteome of an unsequenced pathogen - Leishmania donovani . Proteomics 12: 832–844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Bente M, Harder S, Wiesgigl M, Heukeshoven J, Gelhaus C, et al. (2003) Developmentally induced changes of the proteome in the protozoan parasite Leishmania donovani . Proteomics 3: 1811–1829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Nugent PG, Karsani SA, Wait R, Tempero J, Smith DF (2004) Proteomic analysis of Leishmania mexicana differentiation. Mol Biochem Parasitol 136: 51–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Mc Nicoll F, Drummelsmith J, Muller M, Madore E, Boilard N, et al. (2006) A combined proteomic and transcriptomic approach to the study of stage differentiation in Leishmania infantum . Proteomics 6: 3567–3581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Walker J, Vasquez JJ, Gomez MA, Drummelsmith J, Burchmore R, et al. (2006) Identification of developmentally-regulated proteins in Leishmania panamensis by proteome profiling of promastigote and axenic amastigotes. Mol Biochem Parasitol 147: 64–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Sacks DL, Perkins PV (1984) Identification of an infective stage of Leishmania promastigotes. Science 223: 1417–1419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Da Silva R, Sacks DL (1987) Metacyclogenesis is a major determinant of Leishmania promastigote virulence and attenuation. Infect Immun 55: 2802–2806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Bates PA (1994) Complete developmental cycle of Leishmania mexicana in axenic culture. Parasitology 8: 1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Demasi APD, Martinez EF, Napimoga MH, Freitas LL, Vassallo J, et al. (2013) Expression of peroxiredoxins I and IV in multiple myeloma: association with immunoglobulin accumulation. Virchows Arch 463: 47–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Piacenza L, Peluffo G, Alvarez MN, Martínez A, Radi R (2012) Trypanosoma cruzi antioxidant enzymes as virulence factors in Chagas' disease. Antioxid Redox Signal 19: 723–734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Tang D-J, He Y-Q, Feng J-X, He B-R, Jiang B-L, et al. (2005) Xanthomonas campestris possesses a single gluconeogenic pathway that is required for virulence. J Bacteriol 187: 6231–6237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Brocker C, Lassen N, Estey T, Pappa A, Cantore M, et al. (2010) Aldehyde dehydrogenase 7A1 (ALDH7A1) is a novel enzyme involved in cellular defense against hyperosmotic stress. J Biol Chem 285: 18452–18463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Walker J, Gongora R, Vasquez J-J, Drummelsmith J, Burchmore R, et al. (2012) Discovery of factors linked to antimony resistance in Leishmania panamensis through differential proteome analysis. Mol Biochem Parasitol 183: 166–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Drummelsmith J, Girard I, Trudel N, Ouellette M (2004) Differential protein expression analysis of Leishmania major reveals novel roles for methionine adenosyltransferase and S-adenosylmethionine in methotrexate resistance. J Biol Chem 279: 33273–33280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Ghosh AK, Jacobs-Lorena M (2011) Surface-expressed enolases of Plasmodium and other pathogens. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 106: 85–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Alvarez VE, Niemirowicz GT, Cazzulo JJ (2012) The peptidases of Trypanosoma cruzi: digestive enzymes, virulence factors, and mediators of autophagy and programmed cell death. Biochim Biophys Acta 1824: 195–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Isaza CE, Zhong X, Rosas LE, White JD, Chen RP-Y, et al. (2008) A proposed role for Leishmania major carboxypeptidase in peptide catabolism. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 373: 25–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Jan G, Delorme V, Saksouk N, Abrivard M, Gonzalez V, et al. (2009) A Toxoplasma type 2C serine-threonine phosphatase is involved in parasite growth in the mammalian host cell. Microbes Infect 11: 935–945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Iyer JP, Kaprakkaden A, Choudhary ML, Shaha C (2008) Crucial role of cytosolic tryparedoxin peroxidase in Leishmania donovani survival, drug response and virulence. Mol Microbiol 68: 372–391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Suslu KG, Palabiyik B, Temizkan G (2011) Genes involved in glucose repression and oxidative stress response in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe . Genet Mol Res 10: 4041–4047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Brown SM, Upadhya R, Shoemaker JD, Lodge JK (2010) Isocitrate dehydrogenase is important for nitrosative stress resistance in Cryptococcus neoformans, but oxidative stress resistance is not dependent on glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. Eukaryot Cell 9: 971–980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Poblete-Castro I, Binger D, Rodrigues A, Becker J, Martins-dos-Santos VAP, et al. (2013) In-silico-driven metabolic engineering of Pseudomonas putida for enhanced production of poly-hydroxyalkanoates. Metab Eng 15: 113–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Yoo SJ, Seol JH, Kang MS, Chung CH (1996) Poly-L-lysine activates both peptide and ATP hydrolysis by the ATP-dependent HslVU protease in Escherichia coli . Biochem Biophys Res Commun 229: 531–535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Ramírez G, Valck C, Aguilar L, Kemmerling U, López-Muñoz R, et al. (2012) Roles of Trypanosoma cruzi calreticulin in parasite-host interactions and in tumor growth. Mol Immunol 52: 133–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]