Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1985 Apr;82(8):2493–2497. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.8.2493

Behavioral method for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis.

B Dworkin, N E Miller, S Dworkin, N Birbaumer, M L Brines, S Jonas, E P Schwentker, J J Graham
PMCID: PMC397585  PMID: 3857596

Abstract

Idiopathic scoliosis was treated by an automated portable posture-training device that incorporated precise behavioral principles and enabled therapeutic training to be given in the patients' normal environment throughout the entire day. Twenty-one patient-years of training were completed with a group of 12 adolescent girls selected as being imminently likely to require a brace because of the way their spinal curves had been progressing. As an alternative to conventional brace therapy, patients found the posture-training device considerably less physically restraining and more cosmetically acceptable. Most patients wore it 23 hr per day for at least 1 year and adapted well to the constant physical and psychological presence of the instrument. For 10 patients, the outcome was entirely successful; they were discharged from this pilot study as satisfactorily corrected. Progression of the scoliotic curve was arrested; in fact, there was an average slight improvement in the Cobb angle (a measure of spinal curvature) as measured by x-ray radiography.

Full text

PDF
2493

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Azrin N., Rubin H., O'brien F., Ayllon T., Roll D. Behavioral engineering: postural control by a portable operant apparatus. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Summer;1(2):99–108. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Edmonsson A. S., Morris J. T. Follow-up study of Milwaukee brace treatment in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977 Jul-Aug;(126):58–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kane W. J. Scoliosis prevalence: a call for a statement of terms. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977 Jul-Aug;(126):43–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Keiser R. P., Shufflebarger H. L. The Milwaukee brace in idiopathic scoliosis: evaluation of 123 completed cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976 Jul-Aug;(118):19–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. PONSETI I. V., FRIEDMAN B. Prognosis in idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1950 Apr;32A(2):381–395. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rogala E. J., Drummond D. S., Gurr J. Scoliosis: incidence and natural history. A prospective epidemiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Mar;60(2):173–176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Salanova C. Les résultats lointains du corset de Milwaukee. Les indications. Acta Orthop Belg. 1977 Sep-Oct;43(5):606–615. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wickers F. C., Bunch W. H., Barnett P. M. Psychological factors in failure to wear the Milwaukee brace for treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977 Jul-Aug;(126):62–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES