Abstract
A new macrocycle-based dinuclear nickel chemosensor selectively binds oxalate anions both in solution and the solid state, displaying a remarkable red shift of the fluorescence band with a visible colour change in water at physiological pH in the presence of an external dye.
The selective recognition and sensing of anions is an important research area in supramolecular chemistry because of the fundamental roles played by anions in chemical, biological, medicinal, and environmental applications.1 In particular, the optical sensing via the fluorescence technique is a rapid and cost-effective way to detect an anion at a micromolar level in solution.2 Therefore, a significant effort has been made towards the design of chromogenic and fluorogenic receptors that can selectively recognize anions and act as sensors.3 In this regard, the oxalate anion is of great interest due to its vital roles in chemistry as well as in biochemistry.4 It is naturally present in several foods and serves as a nutrient in the human body; however, an excess consumption of oxalate may result in a number of pathological conditions including renal failure, cardiomyopathy disorder, and the development of kidney stones.5 Oxalate is also produced in the human body as a result of cellular metabolism.5c Since there is no enzyme in the human body to degrade oxalate, it is excreted by the kidney into the urine.5b Therefore, the quantitative information of oxalate is widely used in identifying several diseases including hyperoxaluria, vulvodynia, and kidney stones.6a It is known that the normal level of urinary oxalate excretion is 110 to 460 μmol in 24 hours.6b The oxalate content is clinically determined in urine using several techniques including high performance liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, ion chromatography and enzyme assays which are quite expensive instruments and often require time-consuming sample preparation.7
In recent years, a number of synthetic receptors which are primarily based on H-bond donors, have been developed for the selective binding of anions;8 however, there are only a few known receptors that effectively bind oxalate in aqueous phase.9 Therefore, the chemistry of simple and efficient sensors for the selective sensing of oxalate, particularly at physiological pH in water, remains a major challenge for researchers. On the other hand, dinuclear metallic complexes are generally soluble in water, and are known to bind anions through Lewis-acid–base interactions.10 In particular, macrocycle-based receptors as dinuclear copper,11 cobalt,12 zinc13 and ruthenium9c complexes have been shown to bind various anions, but their applications as dinuclear nickel complexes in anion binding have not been explored yet. Herein, we report a novel macrocycle-based dinuclear nickel complex that selectively binds oxalate anions in a 1 : 2 (host–guest) binding mode both in solution and the solid state, displaying a remarkable red shift of the fluorescence band with a visible colour change in water at physiological pH in the presence of an external dye.
Macrocycle 1 was synthesized according to a procedure reported earlier.11d The nickel complex was prepared from the reaction of 1 with two equivalents of Ni(NO3)2 in a H2O–CH3OH (5 : 1, v/v) mixture (Scheme 1). Green crystals as [Ni2(1)(H2O)6](NO3)4 (L) suitable for X-ray diffraction‡ were grown from the nickel complex dissolved in H2O–CH3OH (5 : 1, v/v) under slow evaporation at room temperature. As shown in Fig. 1A, the macrocycle contains two NiII ions at both N3 terminals in [Ni2(1)(H2O)6]4+, where each NiII is coordinated in an octahedral environment with three nitrogens at one face and three water molecules at the other face of the octahedron (fac conformation), with a Ni···Ni distance of 9.397 Å. The charge (4+) of the complex is balanced by four nitrates located outside the coordination sphere, indicating the poor affinity of NiII centres for nitrates. The cationic unit [Ni2(1)(H2O)6]4+ possesses an inversion center where the aromatic units are parallel to each other, exhibiting π···π interactions (Ar···Ar = 3.403 Å). Notably, three water molecules in each subunit are directed outside the cavity that could possibly be replaced by competitive anions. To test this hypothesis, two equivalents of potassium oxalate were added to the solution of L in H2O–CH3OH (5 : 1, v/v), resulting in the formation of oxalate bound complex [Ni2(1)(H2O)2(ox)2]. The structure of the oxalate complex as shown in Fig. 1B is surprisingly similar to that of L. Two coordinating water molecules at each N3 unit in L are exchanged by one oxalate, demonstrating a clear tendency of [Ni2(1)(H2O)6]4+ to complex oxalate without the compensation of its geometrical transformation. On the basis of a closer look at the two structures, it is likely that the minimum steric strain is required for oxalate to displace the bound water molecules lying at the trans-position of two coordinating secondary amines (N4 and N17) in L.
Scheme 1.
Synthetic pathway to L and oxalate complex from 1, and the chemical structure of the indicator (eosin Y) used.
Fig. 1.
ORTEP plots of the chemosensor L, [Ni2(1)(H2O)6]4+ (A) and the oxalate complex, [Ni2(1)(H2O)6(ox)2] (B). External non-bonded nitrates in A and water molecules in B are not shown for clarity.
In order to evaluate the interaction of L for oxalate, an indicator displacement assay (IDA) was performed using an Eosin Y (EY) fluorescent dye. First, we examined the interaction of L with EY in water. As shown in Fig. 2, upon the incremental addition of L to a solution of EY buffered at pH 7.4 (20 mM HEPES), the fluorescence band (λmax) at 613 nm gradually shifted to a lower wavelength (blue shift), resulting in a saturation at 539 nm of the band with about 15 equivalents of L (inset in Fig. 2). It is noteworthy that this tendency of the blue shift of the fluorescence band is in contrast with that observed for related dinuclear CuII complexes by others9a,b,11c and us11e showing the quenching of fluorescence. The change in the λmax against the concentration of L gave the best fit of a 1 : 2 (L–EY) binding model,14 yielding the binding constant, log K = 4.42. Such a shift instead of a quenching of the fluorescence band could be due to the fact that the dye interacts with a NiII ion from outside rather than inside forming a 1 : 2 adduct, as observed in the crystal structure.
Fig. 2.
The change of emission λmax (blue shift) of EY upon the gradual addition of L in water buffered with 20 mM HEPES at pH 7.4. [EY]o = 2 × 10−6 M, [L]o = 2 × 10−4 M. Excitation = 516 nm. The inset shows the plot of λmax against the concentrations of L.
The sensing ability of the receptor–dye complex (L·EY) for oxalate was then investigated by fluorescent titrations using a mixture of the L and EY dye (L–dye = 2 : 1, mol/mol) in water at pH 7.4 (0.02 M HEPES). After the addition of potassium oxalate (2 × 10−4 M, pH 7.4) to L·EY, the fluorescence band shifted to the higher wavelength, indicating the displacement of EY from the receptor–dye pair to the solution (Fig. 3). The addition of about 3 equivalents of the anion provided a full revival of the fluorescence band at λ = 613 nm due to the free EY. Interestingly, the addition of oxalate in the range of 5–50 μM (0 to 0.25–2.50 equiv.) to L·EY gave the characteristic emission wavelength of L·EY, displaying the complementary colour of the solution (Fig. 4). This detection limit is much lower than the normal range of oxalate content (110 to 460 μM) in urine;6b thereby this receptor could be used as a probe for the direct measurement of the oxalate concentration in practical applications. The change of the fluorescence band as a function of the concentration of oxalate gave the best fit of a 1 : 2 binding model,14 which was further confirmed by Job's plot (Fig. S5 in ESI†) and is in agreement with the solid state structure of the oxalate complex. The calculated binding constant for oxalate was 6.68 (in log K) as compared to the reported value for that with a dinuclear copper complex (log K = 5.11).9a In contrast, the addition of other anions including F−, Cl−, Br−, I−, NO3−, ClO4−, SO42− and PO43− to the receptor–dye complex did not result in any significant change of the fluorescence band (Fig. 5), indicating that the interactions of the receptor–dye complex with these anions are not strong enough to displace the dye from the complex.
Fig. 3.
The change of emission λmax (red shift) of [L·EY] (L–EY = 2 : 1) upon the addition of K2C2O4 in water buffered with 20 mM HEPES at pH 7.4. [L]o = 2 × 10−6 M, [K2C2O4]o = 2 × 10−4 M. Excitation = 516 nm. The inset shows the plot of λmax against the concentration of K2C2O4.
Fig. 4.
Progressive colour change with the increasing amount of oxalate (in ppm) and the corresponding λmax of the fluorescence band during the titration of [L·EY] (L–EY = 2 : 1) with K2C2O4 as shown in Fig. 3.
Fig. 5.
Colourimetric detection of oxalate against various anions (F−, Cl−, Br−, I−, NO3−, ClO4−, SO42− and PO43−) with the solution of L·EY ([L]o = 2 × 10−5 M, L–EY = 1 : 2) in water buffered with 20 mM HEPES at pH 7.4. A: visible light; B: UV light at 365 nm; C: UV light at 254 nm. 10 equiv. of the anion were added to each solution.
The new sensor was further studied for the colourimetric detection of the oxalate anion. Fig. 5 shows the results of colourimetric experiments on L·EY (2 × 10−5 M, L–EY = 1 : 2) after the addition of various anions (20 equivalents) in water (20 mM HEPES at pH 7.4) under visible (A), and UV lights at 365 nm (B) and 254 nm (C). Upon the addition of oxalate to the L·EY solution, the deep magenta colour of the L·EY complex turned into pale orange, which is the original colour of EY (Fig. 5A). This observation suggests the decomplexation of the dye, which was further confirmed by UV studies (Fig. S8 and S9 in ESI†). However, other anions did not affect the colour of the L·EY solution. The colour change event for oxalate is also visually detectable (pale purple to green yellow) when viewed at 365 nm (Fig. 5B). Therefore, the sensor is very useful for detecting oxalate simply by a colour change at a very low concentration in water at physiological pH. It is noteworthy that the fluorescence of the complex EY·L (as well as the mixture of EY·L + other anions) was visually detectable when viewed at 254 nm (Fig. 5C), an observation that is consistent with the titration results of EY with L (Fig. 2), showing a blue shift instead of a quenching of the fluorescence band.
Conclusions
In summary, we have presented a new type of macrocycle-based dinuclear nickel complex that selectively binds an oxalate over a wide range of anions in water at physiological pH. An indicator displacement approach has been successfully applied to identify the oxalate anion under very dilute conditions, providing the remarkable red shift of the fluorescence band upon oxalate binding. Further, oxalate can be detected from the sharp colour change under both visible and UV light in water at physiological pH. Structural characterization of both free and oxalate complexes demonstrates that the dinuclear metal complex provides an ideal geometrical environment where no rearrangement of the structure is necessary to bind oxalate. This new approach provides an insight into the design of selective sensors for other anions that are biologically and chemically important.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
The National Science Foundation is acknowledged for a CAREER award (CHE-1056927) to M.A.H. The NMR core facility at Jackson State University was supported by the National Institutes of Health (G12RR013459).
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Synthesis, characterizations, and NMR and UV-Vis binding studies. CCDC 970398–970399. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/c3dt53467g
Crystal data for [Ni2(1)(H2O)6]4+·4NO3−, M = 984.28, monoclinic, a = 9.233(3) Å, b = 16.580(5) Å, c = 14.170(4) Å, β = 91.545(7)°, V = 2168.4(11) Å3, T = 100(2) K, space group P21/n, Z = 2, μ(MoKα) = 0.958 mm−1, Rint = 0.0543, R1 = 0.0413 (I > 2σ(I)). Crystal data for [Ni2(1)(H2O)2(ox)2]·4.85(H2O), M = 891.36, triclinic, a = 8.9574(10) Å, b = 15.128(2) Å, c = 15.402(2) Å, α = 94.199(9)°, β = 103.866(9)°, γ = 106.950(10)°, V = 1915.1(4) Å3, T = 90.0(5) K, space group , Z = 2, μ(CuKα) = 1.923 mm−1, Rint = 0.0699. R1 = 0.0471 (I > 2σ(I)). CCDC 970398–970399.
References
- 1.a Bowman-James K, Bianchi A, García-Espana E. Anion Coordination Chemistry. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2012. [Google Scholar]; b Gale PA. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010;39:3746. doi: 10.1039/c001871f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Basabe-Desmonts L, Reinhoudt DN, Crego-Calama M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007;36:993. doi: 10.1039/b609548h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.a Quang DT, Kim JS. Chem. Rev. 2007;107:3780. doi: 10.1021/cr068046j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Callan JF, Pu L. Chem. Rev. 2004;104:1687. doi: 10.1021/cr030052h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Martínez-Máñez R, Sancenón F. J. Fluoresc. 2005;15:267. doi: 10.1007/s10895-005-2626-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Harrison PTC. J. Fluorine Chem. 2005;126:1448–1456. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sathish S, Narayan G, Rao N, Janardhana C. J. Fluoresc. 2006;17:1. doi: 10.1007/s10895-006-0137-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.a Robertson WG, Hughes H. Scanning Microsc. 1993;7:391. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Costello LC, Franklin RB. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2008;12:17. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2008.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Marengo SR, Romani AMP. Nat. Clin. Pract. Nephrol. 2008;4:368. doi: 10.1038/ncpneph0845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.a Morakot N, Rakrai W, Keawwangchai S, Kaewtong C, Wanno B. J. Mol. Model. 2009;16:129. doi: 10.1007/s00894-009-0526-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Pal R, Parker D, Costello LC. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009;7:1525. doi: 10.1039/b901251f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.a Šljukić B, Baron R, Compton RG. Electroanalysis. 2007;19:918. [Google Scholar]; b Noblitt SD, Schwandnerb FM, Hering SV, Jr., Collett JL, Henrya CS. J. Chromatogr., A. 2009;1216:1503. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.12.084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.a Beer PD. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000;205:131. [Google Scholar]; b Suksai C, Tuntulani T. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2003;32:192. doi: 10.1039/b209598j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Kim SK, Lee DH, Hong J-I, Yoon J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009;42:23. doi: 10.1021/ar800003f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Katayev EA, Ustynyuk YA, Sessler JL. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006;250:3004. [Google Scholar]; e Hossain MA. Curr. Org. Chem. 2008;12:1231. [Google Scholar]; f Bowman-James K. Acc. Chem. Res. 2005;38:671. doi: 10.1021/ar040071t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g u Y. Zho, and Z. Xu, Yoon J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011;40:2222. [Google Scholar]; h Wenzel M, Hiscock JR, Gale PA. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012;41:480. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15257b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.a Tang L-J, Park J, Kim H-J, Kim Y, Kim SJ, Chin J, Kim KM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:12606. doi: 10.1021/ja804753n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Hu M, Feng G. Chem. Commun. 2012;48:6951. doi: 10.1039/c2cc33191h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Mishra A, Vajpayee V, Kim H, Lee MH, Jung H, Stang PJ, Chi K-W. Dalton Trans. 2012;41:1195. doi: 10.1039/c1dt11612f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.a Fabbrizzi L, Poggi A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013;42:1681. doi: 10.1039/c2cs35290g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Mateus P, Lima LMP, Delgado R. Polyhedron. 2013;52:25. [Google Scholar]; c Mercer DJ, Loeb SJ. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010;39:3612. doi: 10.1039/b926226c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d O'Neil EJ, Smith BD. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006;250:3068. [Google Scholar]
- 11.a Harding CJ, Mabbs FE, MacInnes EJL, McKee V, Nelson J. Dalton Trans. 1996:3227. [Google Scholar]; b Carvalho S, Delgado R, Drew MGB, Félix V, Figueira M, Henriques RT. Polyhedron. 2008;27:679. [Google Scholar]; c Amendola V, Bergamaschi G, Buttafava A, Fabbrizzi L, Monzani E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:147. doi: 10.1021/ja9046262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Mendy JS, Saeed MA, Fronczek FR, Powell DR, Hossain MA. Inorg. Chem. 2010;49:7223. doi: 10.1021/ic100686m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Saeed MA, Powell DR, Hossain MA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010;51:4904. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2010.07.078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Boiocchi M, Bonizzoni M, Fabbrizzi L, Piovani G, Taglietti AA. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004;43:3847. doi: 10.1002/anie.200460036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chen JM, Zhuang XM, Yang LZ, Jiang L, Feng XL, Lu TB. Inorg. Chem. 2008;47:3158. doi: 10.1021/ic702143d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.a Jiang H, O'Neil EJ, DiVittorio KM, Smith BD. Org. Lett. 2005;14:3013. doi: 10.1021/ol0510421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Burdette SC, Walkup GK, Spingler B, Tsien RY, Lippard SJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:7831. doi: 10.1021/ja010059l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hynes MJ. Dalton Trans. 1993:311. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.