Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 7.
Published in final edited form as: Future Cardiol. 2012 Jan;8(1):53–69. doi: 10.2217/fca.11.87

The epicardium as a candidate for heart regeneration

Nicola Smart 1, Paul R Riley 1
PMCID: PMC3977139  EMSID: EMS57656  PMID: 22185446

Abstract

The mammalian heart loses its regenerative capacity during early postnatal stages; consequently, individuals surviving myocardial infarction (MI) are at risk of heart failure due to excessive fibrosis and maladaptive remodelling. There is an urgent need, therefore, to develop novel therapies for myocardial and coronary vascular regeneration. The epicardium-derived cells (EPDCs) present a tractable resident progenitor source with the potential to stimulate neovasculogenesis and contribute de novo cardiomyocytes. The ability to revive ordinarily dormant EPDCs lies in the identification of key stimulatory factors, such as Tβ4, and elucidation of the molecular cues used in the embryo to orchestrate cardiovascular development. MI injury signalling reactivates the adult epicardium; understanding the timing and magnitude of these signals will enlighten strategies for myocardial repair.

Keywords: Epicardium, EPDCs, neovascularisation, myocardial regeneration, cardiac development, epicardial signalling, injury signalling, Thymosin β4

Introduction

While cardiovascular diseases (CVD) remain the major worldwide cause of mortality and morbidity, there is an urgent need to tackle the clinical and economic burden of heart failure. In the United Kingdom alone, CVD kills over 191, 000 individuals each year, with coronary heart disease (CHD) causing the majority of deaths; this costs the UK economy over £14 billion per annum (British Heart Foundation website(101)).

Since the mammalian heart is unable to adequately regenerate beyond early postnatal stages(1), individuals surviving acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are at risk of heart failure and dysrhythmia due to the replacement of lost muscle with a non-contractile scar, fibrosis and ensuing maladaptive remodelling. Despite improved management of acute coronary syndromes using drugs such as statins, beta blockers and ACE inhibitors(2), there is currently no treatment to incite cardiac regeneration. Thus, the only possible cure for patients with end-stage heart failure is transplantation, which is fraught with issues around limited donor hearts and host immune rejection. Therefore, as a fundamental mechanistic strategy to treat heart failure, new approaches are sought towards restoring damaged heart muscle tissue, through repair and regeneration.

The prospects for utilising gene therapy towards improving angiogenesis, inhibiting fibrosis, limiting cell death, modulating cardiomyocyte contractility as well as reactivating the cardiac cell cycle are promising and consequently widely pursued, with particular attention towards overcoming issues of viral vector immunogenicity and risk of insertional mutagenesis(3). However, since a typical human infarct results in the loss of approximately one billion cardiomyocytes(4), the seemingly impossible challenge of restoring an equivalent complement has focussed efforts on the identification of new cellular sources for cardiomyocyte replacement (reviewed in(5)).A number of embryonic and adult cell types have been explored in both preclinical and patient trials but, due to modest outcome, impaired graft survival and limited trans-differentiation, attention has turned to the identification of tractable progenitor populations that reside within the adult heart. A contemporary paradigm in regenerative medicine is that tissue repair in the adult is frequently underpinned by a re-activation of the embryonic programme that created the tissue in the first instance. As such there is much to gain from understanding the embryonic mechanisms of vasculogenesis and cardiogenesis. The success of this approach lies in the identification of a tractable progenitor cell population and the development of appropriate strategies for their redeployment in the adult, based on defined embryonic roles. Due to their fundamental role in heart development, the epicardium-derived cells (EPDCs) have emerged as a population that fulfil this remit and have come under intense scrutiny as a new source for myocardial regeneration. A prerequisite for utilising EPDCs in this regard is the identification of factors to reactivate this ordinarily dormant reservoir of cells in order to exploit their restorative power. Reactivation of the adult epicardium was first revealed using the actin-monomer binding protein Thymosin β4 (Tβ4) and subsequently shown by the venom-related protein family member prokineticin-2. However, until large-scale small molecule screens yield further insight, we are limited in our ability to pharmacologically stimulate the adult epicardium. Herein we review the potential of Tβ4-activated EPDCs to contribute towards repair of the adult heart, with regeneration of the coronary vasculature as well as the myocardium. Since myocardial injury is itself sufficient to promote epicardial activation and neovascularisation and Tβ4 appears to act synergistically to enhance the extent of repair(6), we discuss the potential for injury-associated signals to reactivate the epicardium. While the intrinsic injury response is inadequate to fully repair the adult myocardium, an understanding of the signalling pathways that underlie epicardial activation should inform strategies to therapeutically realize a full-scale response, recapitulating development, towards myocardial regeneration via the targeting of adult EPDCs.

The Epicardium in Development and Disease

The developing heart receives cellular contributions from three main sources(7). The cardiogenic mesoderm establishes the primitive heart tube, an avascular structure with myocardial and endocardial layers. As the myocardium increases in size and the heart transitions to a more complex multilayered organ, diffusion becomes unfeasible and the heart requires a dedicated vascular system(8). Following looping of the heart tube, cardiac neural crest cells migrate from the dorsal neural tube to contribute vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) to the great arteries and, at the same time, proepicardial precursors contact the surface, to form the epicardium(9,10)

The epicardium gives rise to EPDCs, multipotent cardiac progenitors that were proposed by Wessels and Perez-Pomares in 2004 to be “true cardiac stem cells”(11), due to their potential to differentiate into endothelial cells (ECs)(12), coronary VSMCs(10), cardiac fibroblasts(13), possibly AV cushion mesenchyme(13,14), (12)and cardiomyocytes(11). In addition to direct contribution of cardiac cells, the epicardium plays a critical role, via paracrine secretion of key signalling factors, in myocardial compaction, Purkinje fibre development and inhibition of endocardial EMT (epithelial-mesenchymal transition; reviewed in (15).

That EPDCs give rise to VSMCs, pericytes and fibroblasts is widely accepted (16), however, contribution to the cardiomyocyte and endothelial lineages is more divisive. While recent studies proposed an epicardial origin for a proportion of cardiomyocytes(17,18), both in development and disease, has been challenged (19) (20). A number of factors have confounded a consensus, including the heterogeneity of the epicardium and the paucity of suitable epicardium-specific markers and EPDC cre-expressing strains for conventional lineage tracing. Generic caveats of cre-based lineage tracing notwithstanding(21,22), those reported for epicardial fate mapping have to date have utilised cre knocked in to either the Tbx18(18) or Wt(17) locus or a Gata5cre transgenic strain(23). The latter strain is potentially compromised for use in lineage tracing due to the possibility of ectopic activation within the myocardium. Of the knock-in epicardial lines, the Tbx18cre is compromised by the fact that Tbx18 is expressed in cardiomyocytes between E10.5 and E16.5(19) (24). In a direct comparison with the Wt1cre, Zeng and colleagues excluded Wt1 expression in cardiomyocytes(24), establishing the basis for its use in a number of studies to date(17,25,26,27,28). The embryonic study utilising this trace demonstrated that Wt1+ progenitors differentiated into fully functional cardiomyocytes that comprised up to 10% of ventricular and 18% of atrial cardiomyocytes in the developing heart (17). Contrary to this, lineage tracing in zebrafish failed to demonstrate a contribution of epicardial (tcf21+) cells to the myocardium of either the embryonic or injured adult heart(29). Whether this disparity reflects species variance including the unique ability of more primitive zebrafish cardiomyocytes to dedifferentiate and proliferate following injury, or the differential contribution of heterogeneous sub-populations of epicardial cells, identified by distinct markers, remains to be resolved.

Additional problems arise when lineage tracing in the adult since expression of most known epicardial genes is restricted to embryonic stages and silenced in the adult. Thymosin β4, combined with myocardial injury, was exploited to enable adult epicardial reactivation, Wt1 re-expression and the use of constitutive (Wt1GFPCre/+ knock-in) and conditional (Wt1CreERT2/+ knock-in) epicardial cell tracking in the adult(28). With this approach, a modest contribution of cardiomyocytes from the adult epicardium was observed(28), as discussed in full below.

Equally unresolved is the origin of the coronary endothelium ; formerly thought to originate from the epicardium(30,12), it is increasingly argued that very few, if any, are (pro-)epicardium-derived ((31,32,33). For a detailed recent discussion, please refer to (22)). At least in mouse, coronary vessels have been shown to arise from angiogenic sprouts of the sinus venosus, with a secondary contribution from the endocardium (32). As they traverse a stereotyped path through the myocardium, sinus venosus cells dedifferentiate with a switch from venous (EphB4+) to arterial (ephrinb2+) fate; vessels that invade the myocardium develop into mature arteries while those that remain superficial re-express venous markers and give rise to veins. Regardless of origin, endothelial precursors within the subepicardial space migrate over the heart in the same direction as epicardial growth (in an anterior and ventral progression). Following migration, endothelial precursors coalesce to form a primitive vascular plexus which undergoes extensive branching to form the mature coronary tree, following connection with the aorta (34). Upon perfusion, capillaries are remodelled into larger vessels via vascular wall matrix enrichment and recruitment of VSMCs and pericytes from the epicardium (arteriogenesis)(34).

Reciprocal paracrine signalling between the myocardium and epicardium is important throughout development(35); epicardial-derived signals direct proliferation of the underlying cardiomyocytes and prepare the epicardium for EMT (e.g. (36))while signals from the myocardium serve to induce epicardial EMT (e.g. (37)), directing the differentiation of the subepicardial mesenchyme into cardiomyocytes and components of the coronary vasculature. The epicardium may continue to nurture the myocardium beyond foetal life with evidence for myocardial homeostasis in the zebrafish(38) and the demonstration that the differentiated phenotype of adult rat ventricular myocytes, including appropriate sarcomeric organisation and contractile function, is preserved upon coculture with epicardial cells; interestingly, this study reveals an epicardial role beyond paracrine stimulation since long term maintenance required direct epicardial-myocardial contact(39).

While epicardial-myocardial signalling has not been extensively studied following myocardial injury, a number of preliminary observations suggest that the epicardium responds by transmitting and receiving signals, extending its embryonic role, and may influence the outcome of MI. Valuable insight into the epicardial response may be derived from studies in zebrafish. Following resection of the adult fish heart, the epicardium exhibits a rapid and robust response to injury, which includes the re-expression of embryonic epicardial markers, Tbx18 and Raldh2 and proliferation of EPDCs within 1-2 days of resection (40). The activated epicardium envelopes the cardiac chambers, including the injured apex, and a subpopulation of cells invades the sub-epicardial space and myocardium to contribute endothelial and VSMCs to form new coronary vessels; this is an exact recapitulation of the processes involving the mammalian epicardium during development of the coronary vasculature. Consistent with this notion, microarray analysis of regenerating fish hearts revealed up-regulation of genes encoding several key secretory factors implicated in coronary development, including vegfc, pdgf-a, pdgf-b and Tβ4 (41), along with the receptor for PDGF-B, Pdgfrβ (42). Inhibition of PDGF signalling in this context impaired epicardial cell and cardiomyocyte proliferation and inhibited EMT and coronary vessel formation(42,41). The epicardium, as well as the endocardium in the regenerating zebrafish, is a dynamic injury-responsive source of potent myocardial mitogens, such as retinoic acid which stimulates myocardial regeneration via the dedifferentiation and proliferation of cardiomyocytes(43,44). While comparatively meagre in their ability to regenerate, recent studies point to a retention of the epicardial activation mechanism, albeit diminished, in mammals(28,26). Epicardial thickening in response to MI has recently been shown to act as a source of trophic paracrine factors which condition the underlying myocardium for repair in an analogous manner to nurturing myocardial growth during development(26). Indeed, it has been speculated that epicardial activation and thickening may underlie the human phenomenon observed in Dressler syndrome, a complication of MI and cardiac surgery, in which inflammation of the epicardium and pericardium occur in response to injury, associated with chest pain and fever(45). Far from simply being an immune-mediated response, it may reflect an evolutionarily-conserved mesothelial activation with the potential to contribute to repair. Although difficult to define the impact of epicardial reactivation on the outcome of MI injury, it may be significant that the subepicardium is the main region of myocardial salvage post- MI and infarct repair initiates earlier than in the mid-myocardium(46). While this may be attributable to its higher residual blood flow, compared with the mid-myocardium and sub-endocardium, it is possible that faster repair and larger myocyte mass may result from the delivery of both pro-survival and trophic paracrine factors to the myocardium as well as the contribution of myocardial and vascular precursors from the epicardium. In support of this, transplantation of human adult EPDCs into the ischaemic mouse myocardium improved cardiac function and attenuated adverse remodelling(47).

Application of Thymosin β4 to Harness the Regenerative Potential of the Epicardium

Lacking the intrinsic regenerative capacity of fish, the mammalian epicardium requires a helping hand to achieve even a modest improvement in myocardial regeneration. The potential for so inducing the adult epicardium was first revealed in rodent cardiac explant studies when Tβ4 was shown to stimulate EPDC migration, restoring the quiescent adult epicardium to its pluripotent embryonic state to enable the derivation of vascular progenitors (48). As well as inducing epicardial markers in the adult, Tβ4 treatment was associated with the induction of FGF17, FGFR-2, FGFR4, VEGF, Flk-1, TGFβ and β-catenin, factors that promote EMT, in the epicardium(49). These studies represent a significant milestone towards translation of the developmental role for Tβ4 to that of myocardial regenerative therapy.

Epicardial Potential for Neovascularisation

To date, attempts to develop therapies to promote neovascularization in the adult heart have met with limited success. The potential of EPDCs for repair was extrapolated to determine the ability of Tβ4 to promote neovascularization in a murine MI model(6). Tβ4-treated, infarcted hearts revealed dramatic EPDC proliferation and large numbers of ECs and VSMCs in the expanded sub-epicardial space which assembled to form a capillary network. Compared with a modest degree of VSMC recruitment in vehicle-treated hearts, extensive VSMC migration and differentiation and a significant increase in the number of perfused, functional VSMC-lined arterioles was observed following Tβ4 treatment. Arteriogenesis may therefore explain the beneficial effects of Tβ4 treatment post-MI, beyond the relatively unstable and grossly inadequate endogenous capillary response.

Tβ4-activated EPDCs as a source of de novo cardiomyocytes

Just as the myocardium and coronary vasculature develop simultaneously in a coordinated manner, it is highly desirable, therapeutically, to reinstate all damaged components concurrently within the diseased adult heart. Indeed, attempts to replenish muscle in an ischaemic environment are futile. The epicardium, by contributing to the myocardium and coronary vasculature in the embryo offers a unique target for co-ordinately stimulating myocardial and coronary vascular repair. From the demonstration of a significant epicardial contribution to the cardiomyocyte lineage came a basis for translating myocardial potential into the adult heart(17). The ability of Tβ4 to reactivate the adult epicardium was exploited in order to “prime” adult Wt1GFPCre/+ and Wt1 CreERT2/+ knock-in mice and reactivate Wt1 expression (a key epicardial marker) to provide both constitutive (GFP+) and pulse- (YFP+) labelling of EPDCs, respectively. Thus, reactivated Wt1-driven reporter expression enabled the tracking of the spatiotemporal distribution of epicardium-derived cardiomyocyte precursors through to mature myocytes(28). This approach revealed YFP+ EPDCs, including cardiac progenitors, migrating from the epicardium (days 2-7) and, by day 14 post-MI, larger YFP+ cells, co-expressing sarcomeric markers and morphologically resembling mature cardiomyocytes, within the myocardium. Importantly, the de novo cardiomyocytes were appropriately integrated with resident myocardium via both adherens’ and gap junctions. Moreover, functional integration of YFP+ cardiomyocytes with existing myocardium was demonstrated upon measuring [Ca2+]i transients with neighbouring YFP-cardiomyocytes. MRI analyses over a 28 day time course after MI revealed Tβ4 treatment resulted in significant improvement in ejection fraction and end diastolic/systolic volumes alongside beneficial changes in infarct/scar volume with increased left ventricular mass over time consistent with replenishment of myocardium. Despite the beneficial outcome, a limitation of this approach is the requirement to pre-treat (“prime”) with Tβ4 prior to injury which, from a translational perspective, would require the identification of patients considered at risk of MI. No cardiomyocyte replenishment from epicardial precursors was achieved without pre-treatment (26,28), or when Tβ4 was administered only after MI(25). Whether epicardial activation prior to injury is required to alter the subsequent fate of epicardial cells or whether it simply enhances the magnitude of response sufficiently, over and above the activation that occurs by injury alone, or in combination with Tβ4 post-treatment, remains to be determined. Critically, however, the demonstration of myocardial regeneration via the epicardium paves the way for the discovery of novel compounds that more efficiently promote regeneration, whether given before or after injury. Replenishment of destroyed myocardium by activated EPDCs is a significant advance towards resident cell-based therapy for acute MI in human patients. Thus, in addition to its pro-survival effects(50), Tβ4 can activate adult epicardium to not only induce neovascularisation(6) but promote myocardial regeneration(28) to restore a functional vasculature, maintain cardiomyocyte survival and replace lost muscle in the injured heart.

Myocardial Injury Signalling: Possible Interaction with the Epicardium

The myocardium responds to stresses by activating a multitude of adaptive mechanisms to limit cellular injury and to regenerate, as much as possible, the damaged tissue; however, the extent to which these processes can be induced intrinsically varies considerably between species. As described above, the zebrafish possesses an unparalleled capacity for regeneration, the like of which is lost in mammals beyond the earliest post-natal stages(51). In ventricular resection models, regeneration of both fish(40) and neonatal murine hearts(51) is underpinned by reactivation of the epicardium. While regeneration in these models can be achieved by a prevailing dedifferentiation and proliferation of existing “primitive” (mononuclear) cardiomyocytes, regeneration of the adult mammalian heart depends upon activating resident precursors and injury alone affords minimal regenerative impetus. However, injury signalling activates the epicardium in the adult mouse, to initiate a neovascular response which correlates with the extent of injury(6). The molecular identity of injury signals and the mechanisms by which they activate the epicardium are currently unknown but a number of candidate pathways have emerged (Figure 1). Understanding the timing and magnitude of myocardial-epicardial signals, based upon defined embryonic roles and recapitulation in the injury setting, will enlighten strategies to direct epicardial EMT and proliferation and to influence EPDC fate. Collectively, enhancing positive signals and inhibiting repressive stimuli to achieve maximal activation alongside balancing differentiation factors to shift EPDC fate from predominantly fibroblast towards an adequate quota of cardiomyocytes and vascular precursors may enable the benefits of epicardium-based therapy to be realised.

Figure 1. Recapitulating Embryonic Signalling in the Ischaemic Heart.

Figure 1

Following myocardial infarction, many of the reciprocal myocardial-epicardial signalling pathways that regulate coronary and myocardial development in the embryo are re-activated. The response to MI also generates distinct changes to components of the extracellular matrix (ECM), to recapitulate its role during development. Additional factors known to act on the embryonic epicardium are secreted from fibroblasts, activated vascular cells, infiltrating inflammatory cells and platelets, mobilised bone marrow-derived cells, including bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs). The factors underlined indicate those in which embryonic expression is faithfully recapitulated (i.e. in the same cell type) following injury. Other listed factors are those which impact on the developing epicardium and are expressed following MI, but a signalling role from that cell type to affect the adult epicardium has not, to-date, been shown. Black arrows indicate signalling between cell types; blue arrows indicates differentiation of EPDCs into derivative smooth muscle cells, fibroblasts, cardiomyocytes and, possibly, endothelial cells.

After onset of MI, the left ventricle undergoes a succession of molecular, cellular, and extracellular changes that culminate in wall thinning, dilation, and fibrosis. Although a degree of fibrotic healing is necessary to prevent cardiac rupture, maladaptive remodelling hinders regeneration, promotes excessive dilation and dysfunction and ultimately leads to heart failure. Broadly speaking, the cardiac healing process consists of four overlapping phases: (1) cardiomyocyte death; (2) infiltration of monocytes and lymphocytes into the necrotic myocardium for the removal of dead cardiomyocytes; (3) formation of granulation tissue, characterized by the presence of fibroblasts, macrophages, myofibroblasts, new blood vessels, and extracellular matrix (ECM) components; and (4) collagen scar formation. Endothelial activation and injury, in response to ischaemia, increase vascular permeability and invasion by inflammatory cells, notably neutrophils, and platelets. Moreover, up-regulation of soluble factors such as SDF-1 stimulates the mobilization of bone marrow progenitor cells and their homing to the myocardium(52). Paracrine trophic factors, secreted from injured and border zone myocardium, as well as the vasculature, the infiltrating cells and transformed ECM components (Table 1) recapitulate much of the developmental myocardial signalling that regulates EPDC EMT, migration and differentiation and likely underlie intrinsic epicardial reactivation that occurs following injury.

Table 1. Epicardial Signalling in Development and Disease.

A summary of the signalling pathway components involved in coronary and myocardial development which may contribute towards reactivation of the adult epicardium following myocardial infarction. BMSC: bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell; CM: cardiomyocyte; EC: endothelial cell; ECM: extracellular matrix; EMT: epithelial-mesenchymal transition; EPC: endothelial progenitor cell; EPDC: epicardium-derived cell; MI: myocardial infarction; PF: pericardial fluid; VSMC: vascular smooth muscle cell.

SIGNALLING FACTOR DEVELOPMENTAL ROLE RESPONSE FOLLOWING INJURY REFERENCES
Fibroblast Growth Factors (FGFs) FGF -1, -2 and -7; FGFRs -1 and -2 expressed in myocardium; FGF -1,-2, -4, -9, -16 and -20 and FGFR1 expressed in epicardium. Roles in EMT and invasion, as well as EC differentiation and myocardial proliferation. FGF-1 ↑ in inflammatory cells and PF; FGF-2 ↑ in myocardium and PF; FGF-17 ↑ in myocardium and epicardium. FGF receptors -1 and -2 ↑ in epicardium. [49]; [54]; [55]; [58]; [88];
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) VEGF-A, -B, and –D in cardiomyocytes, VEGF-C in pericytes; VEGF receptors expressed in epicardium and sub-epicardium. VEGF signaling induces epicardial EMT and EC proliferation, differentiation and angiogenesis. ↑ in myocardium, endocardium, PF, serum, BMSCs, EPCs and epicardium; Flk-1 ↑ in epicardium. [49]; [59]; [62]; [63];
Angiopoietins Myocardial Ang1 and Ang2 signal via epicardial Tie2 for coronary vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. Ang2 ↑ in myocardium and serum; Tie2 ↑ in myocardium. [65]
Transforming Growth Factor β (TGFβ) TGFβ expressed in epicardium and compact myocardium; TGFβ receptors expressed in epicardium and myocardium; regulate EMT, invasion and VSMC differentiation. ↑ in myocardium, epicardium and platelets. [49]; [54]; [83]
Platelet-Derived Growth Factors (PDGFs) Signalling via epicardial PDGF-α and -β receptors regulates EMT and EPDC differentiation. ↑ in platelets, ECs, myofibroblasts, epicardium, mural cells, BMSCs. [78]; [80]; [81]; [82]; [83]
Wnt/ β catenin Pathway Epicardial β-catenin critical for myocardial proliferation. Promotes EPDC differentiation to VSMCs. β-catenin ↓ in myocardium but ↑ in epicardium following Tβ4 treatment. [23]; [49]
Retinoic Acid Synthesis in epicardium by RALDH2 critical for myocardial proliferation and coronary angiogenesis. Represses SM differentiation to allow Ec network branching. ↑ in epicardium; required for CM proliferation and regeneration in zebrafish. [28]; [86]; [88]; [89]
Erythropoietin Signals via epicardial receptor to induce vasculogenesis, angiogenesis and CM proliferation Increases myocardial VEGF and capillary density; effect on epicardium unknown following injury. [92]; [93]
Notch Signalling Expressed in EPDCs to establish arterial versus venous identity. Regulates EPDC-VSMS differentiation ↑ in CMs and in some EPDCs (Notch-activated epicardial-derived progenitor cells). [33]; [98]; [99]
Prokineticin (PK) Myocardial PK2 acts via its epicardial receptor PKR-1 to support coronary vessel development. PK2 and its receptors, PKR-1 and -2, ↑ following MI to induce vasculogenic EPDC differentiation and protect CMs. [101]; [102]
Thymosin β4 Tβ4 myocardial-epicardial signaling critical for EPDC migration. Tβ4 ↑ in CMs, EPDCs, EPCs, BMSCs. Reactivates adult epicardium; stimulates EPDC migration; promotes neovascularization and de novo CM production. [6]; [28]; [48]
ECM Components Interaction with ECM regulates integrin-mediated signaling, critical for EPDC EMT. ↑ collagen and ↑ periostin production by fibroblasts and epicardial cells; fibronectin, vimentin and tenascin C ↑ in epicardium; ↑ tenascin C in myocardium. [18]; [104]; [112]

Fibroblast Growth Factors

Reciprocal FGF signalling between the epicardium and myocardium is critical for coronary vessel and myocardial development. FGF receptor 1 (FGFR1) is expressed in the epicardium and is up-regulated in response to myocardial FGF. FGF-FGFR1 signalling appears sufficient but not necessary to promote epicardial EMT; it is, however, required for EPDC invasion of the myocardium. Moreover, FGF signalling has been shown to influence the differentiation and remodelling of the subepicardial mesenchyme with FGF-2 shown to induce endothelial cells in avian heart(53), and promote angiogenesis. In return, FGFs constitute one of the epicardial signals that induce myocyte proliferation. A number of FGF family members are expressed in the epicardium including FGF-1, -2, -4, -9, -16, and -20 (reviewed in (54)) and expression of FGF receptors (FGFR1 and FGFR2c) renders embryonic cardiomyocytes competent to receive proliferative FGF signals.

Following MI, FGF-1 becomes up-regulated, particularly in inflammatory cells within the border zone of infarcted rat myocardium; elevated protein levels peak at 7 days and subside by 14 days(55); FGF-2 gene expression is significantly elevated for the full 14 days post-MI and is primarily produced by endothelial cells. It is relevant, therefore, that FGF receptor expression increased at day 3 and remained elevated in the infarcted myocardium and overlying epicardium(55). Myocardial FGF17b and epicardial FGFR2 and FGFR4 have been proposed to regulate epicardial EMT during regeneration post ventricular resection in adult zebrafish(40). Although FGF17, the murine homologue, is not expressed during development(56), its expression post-MI in the sub-epicardium is enhanced by Tβ4 treatment(49). Myocardially secreted FGF-1(57) and FGF-2 levels(58) in the pericardial fluid of MI patients were found to correlate with the severity of ischaemia; moreover, the finding of higher FGF-2 in patients with unstable angina than in patients with non-ischaemic heart disease infers an important role in mediating collateral growth in humans. While a role for the epicardium in this process is highly speculative, the changes post-MI are reminiscent of development and would facilitate reactivation.

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors

The VEGF family, comprising five ligands (VEGF-A, -B, -C, -D, and placental growth factor) with multiple splice isoforms and three receptors (VEGFR1/Flt-1, VEGFR2/Flk-1/KDR, and VEFGR3/Flt-4), plays multiple roles in the development of the coronary vasculature(59). VEGF-A, VEGF-B, and VEGF-D are expressed in cardiomyocytes, while VEGF-C is expressed in pericytes(60) and their receptors are expressed in the epicardium and subepicardium. Myocardial to epicardial VEGF signalling appears to induce epicardial EMT and subsequently induces coronary EC proliferation, migration and tube formation in conjunction with FGF-2(53).

Mediated by HIF-1α, myocardial hypoxia leads to the up-regulation of the same cohort of pro-angiogenic growth factors that are implicated in developmental coronary vasculogenesis, including VEGF and its receptors, flk-1 and flt-1 (61). Following permanent LAD ligation in the rat heart, Vegf-a increases in the endocardium and cardiomyocytes of the border zone within 2 hours and remains elevated for two days(62). Moreover, VEGF isoforms are abundantly secreted from EPCs(62) and BMSCs(63). As well as potently inducing coronary angiogenesis by stimulating ECs, VEGF signalling post-MI may contribute epicardium-mediated vasculogenesis to improve myocardial perfusion. The promising preclinical results obtained in animal studies have yet to be translated into man. The largest phase II VEGF trial (VIVA), involving 178 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), recorded no significant effect in the primary end point of treadmill exercise capacity at four months (64). Lack of efficacy in trials of therapeutic angiogenesis may be explained by the lack of concomitant arteriogenesis; capillaries that form by vasculogenesis, without smooth muscle (SM) support are unstable and regress over time.

Angiopoietin Signalling

Angiopoietins represent a family of endothelial growth factors expressed in the myocardium which act on the receptor, Tie-2, to direct coronary vessel development (65). During development, Ang1 is highly expressed in the myocardium and signals to Tie2 in both the epicardium and endocardium. Ang1 levels are critically regulated during development for appropriate coronary vasculogenesis and angiogenesis(65), with an excess or deficiency equally detrimental. The other major ligand for the Tie2 receptor, Ang2, also influences coronary development, with evidence that it behaves as a weak Tie2 agonist acting synergistically with VEGF to increase capillary density(66). Cardiac Ang2 and Tie2 are up-regulated within the first 48 hours of reperfusion following MI in the rat(67) and Ang2 levels were found to be elevated in the serum of AMI patients. Recapitulating vascular development, elevated Ang2 and VEGF may act in synergy via the epicardium and existing coronary vasculature to facilitate revascularisation of the ischaemic myocardium.

Transforming Growth Factor β

TGF signalling inputs at multiple stages in coronary vasculature formation. TGFβ2 is the predominant isoform expressed in the embryo during early epicardial and coronary vascular formation. TGFβ2 transduces its signals by interacting with heteromeric complexes of a type I and a type II TGFβ receptor (TBRI and TBRII, respectively), and occasionally TBRIII. The TGFβ superfamily ubiquitously regulates EMT in multiple tissues. TGFβ induces loss of epithelial cell character in epicardial cells via TBRI, p38 MAP kinase and p160 rho kinase to modulate angiogenesis(68) and promotes VSMC differentiation. Downstream of this pathway, transcription of hyaluronan synthase 2 produces the ECM component hyaluronic acid (HA) in the epicardium to induce EPDC invasion and differentiation,via the hyaluronate receptor (CD44)(69),. TGFβ-mediated regulation of epicardial EMT is additionally imposed via myocardial TGFβ-stimulated phosphorylation of the BMP receptor, ALK2, and smad-mediated transcriptional changes(70). Culturing human adult epicardial cells in the presence of TGFβ induced EMT and SM differentiation via the ALK5 receptor and coincided with down-regulation of WT1, a marker of undifferentiated EPDCs, and vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM-1)(71). VCAM-1 and WT1, therefore, present additional targets for therapeutic induction of epicardial cell-based regeneration. Reverse TGFβ signalling from the epicardium also participates since TGFβ ligands are expressed in the epicardium and the compact myocardium throughout coronary development, as is TBRIII and, while signalling via this receptor may negatively regulate epicardial EMT, it appears to promote invasion into the subepicardial and myocardial compartments(72).

Following MI, TGFβ isoforms are up-regulated and, via their potent effects on the epicardium, are capable of mediating critical roles in cardiac repair. However, TGFβ is additionally pro-fibrotic and pro-inflammatory in this setting(73); TGF-β1 expression post-MI increases fibroblasts and collagen fibrils(74) and elevated TGF-β expression is associated with adverse remodelling during cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. The epicardium, particularly in the ischaemic setting, is a rich source of fibroblasts; understanding the modifiers of TGFβ signalling is therefore critical to therapeutically shift the balance of EPDC contribution towards myocardial and coronary vascular progenitors and away from fibroblasts, which, by and large, appears to be the default fate(26). High molecular weight HA stimulates epicardial cell differentiation in vitro(69). Due primarily to their pro-angiogenic and arteriogenic properties, various HA-based injectable hydrogels have been tested for their ability to regenerate the ischaemic heart(75). Application of HA proximal to the epicardium may engage EPDC activation to contribute towards repair and may present a means of diverting TGFβ-induced EPDC fate away from the pro-fibrotic fibroblast phenotype.

Platelet-Derived Growth Factors

Platelet-derived growth factors (PDGFs) comprise four monomeric peptides, PDGF-A, -B, -C, and -D, that act as dimers in one of five forms: AA, AB, BB, CC, and DD, by binding transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptors. PDGF receptor (PDGFR)α binds all PDGF dimers except PDGF-DD, whereas PDGFRβ binds only -BB and -DD homodimers; both receptors are expressed in the epicardium(76,77). PDGF signalling crucially supports epicardial EMT and possibly myocardial invasion, via PDGFRα-mediated WT1 repression(78), as well as PDGFRβ-mediated Rho kinase and phosphatidyinositol-3 kinase pathway activation(79). PDGF signalling may additionally govern cell fate since activation of PDGFRα has been implicated in myocardial differentiation and fibroblast production whereas PDGF-BB/PDGFRβ potently induces SM fate, in keeping with its requirement for VSMC and pericyte recruitment and differentiation in the coronary vascular bed.

Expression of PDGF-B, PDGFRα and PDGFRβ was induced in reperfused mouse infarcts, with activation of PDGFRβ signalling in perivascular cells within the infarct(80). The importance of this pathway in maturation of infarct vasculature was demonstrated by PDGFRβ blockade, which resulted in enhanced capillary density; however, vessels were dilated, lacked mural cell support and displayed increased permeability to red blood cells and macrophages. Acquisition of a mural coat and maturation of the vasculature promotes resolution of inflammation and stabilization of the scar(80). PDGF-A and –D and PDGF receptors were significantly increased in rat myocardium, primarily in ECs, macrophages and myofibroblasts, to coincide with angiogenic, inflammatory and fibrogenic responses(81). Inhibition of either PDGFRα or PDGFRβ significantly decreased collagen deposition in the infarct(80). Improved myocardial repair may be achieved by therapeutic manipulation of receptor activation, particularly if due consideration is given to the epicardial component of PDGF signalling.

Increased plasma PDGF levels in AMI patients(82) may be contributed by increased activation of platelets or monocytes, two major sources of PDGF. Secretion of such factors has been utilised therapeutically with the development of autologous platelet gel, derived from concentrated platelets activated and induced to secrete stimulatory cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines. Gels provide a temporary and local hyperphysiological concentration of platelet secretory factors that may initiate adaptive myocardial healing(83). Local delivery of a combination of potent epicardial mitogens, by application of platelet gel to areas of cardiac injury may contribute towards the stimulation of myocyte regeneration, angiogenesis, and restoration of ECM composition.

Wnt Signalling

Wnt signalling, particularly via the canonical (β-catenin-stabilizing) pathway, is critical for heart development with expression of β-catenin in the epicardium required for myocardial proliferation(23) and epicardial EMT. Mice with epicardial-deleted β-catenin appropriately form a primitive capillary plexus in the subepicardial space and the coronary venous system remodels appropriately, however, the coronary arteries fail to recruit VSMCs suggesting a primary requirement in SM differentiation of EPDCs. Epicardial Wnt expression appears to be downstream of the RA pathway(23). A model has been proposed in which epicardial RA signalling activates FGF-2 expression, possibly indirectly via the myocardium, to induce epicardial Wnt9b expression and β-catenin activation to promote EPDC differentiation into coronary VSMC lineage for contribution to the coronary arterial tree(54). Disabled-2 (Dab2) is a TGFβ receptor adaptor protein which interacts with two components of the β-catenin destruction complex, Dvl-3 and axin, and stabilizes axin to inhibition Wnt/β-catenin-mediated signalling(84). miR-145 is down-regulated in the myocardium following acute MI and is associated with increased Dab2 expression to down-regulate Wnt/β-catenin signalling in border zone cardiomyocytes(85). It would be informative to determine whether epicardial β-catenin is similarly repressed and whether this can be pharmacologically reversed in order for the epicardium to respond to myocardial FGF-2, as it does during development, to contribute towards arteriogenesis and repair. Indeed, Tβ4 treatment enabled a modest elevation of epicardial β-catenin expression over 24-72 hours post-MI(49), supporting the value of targeting epicardial Wnt signalling to facilitate repair.

Retinoic Acid

Retinoic acid signalling is critical for normal cardiogenesis, requiring tight control over its levels for appropriate embryonic development. RALDH2, the enzyme responsible for RA synthesis and retinoic acid receptors (RXRs and RARs) on the epicardium are required to non-cell autonomously promote cardiomyocyte proliferation and differentiation, ventricular maturation and coronary angiogenesis(86). Appropriate coronary vascular development requires the formation of a complex, hierarchical tree of coronary vessels within a provasculogenic environment before vessel structure is stabilized with recruitment of ECM-producing VSMCs. While elevated VEGF promotes endothelial differentiation and angiogenesis, a physiological delay in VSMC maturation is achieved by high levels of RA to continually repress SM fate, in the face of high myocardial serum response factor, TGFβ and PDGF, strong promoters of VSMC differentiation(87). Following development of an extensive endothelial network, RA and VEGF levels decline, releasing the brake to allow EPDC differentiation into VSMCs. In recapitulating these embryonic mechanisms in the disease setting, it will be essential to reproduce the spatiotemporal and graded release of growth factors, rather than deliver a continuous sustained level of competing factors.

Following MI, RALDH2 is reactivated in mouse epicardium (88,28) and, in fish, its organ-wide re-expression in both the epicardium and endocardium is indispensible for cardiomyocyte proliferation and regeneration(89). The lack of endocardial activation and poor intrinsic epicardial activation may, in part, account for the inadequate regeneration in mammalian hearts. Indeed, attempts to boost epicardial activation, for example using Tβ4, increased Raldh2 levels and facilitated myocardial regeneration(28).

Erythropoietin

The cytokine erythropoietin (Epo) similarly signals via its epicardially expressed receptor (EpoR) in the embryo, to both regulate vasculogenesis and angiogenesis(90) and to induce cardiomyocyte proliferation(91). Here Epo functions cooperatively with RA to activate epicardial IGF2 which, in turn, stimulates compact zone growth(92). Epo was shown to protect the heart after MI by inducing angiogenesis and preventing cardiomyocyte apoptosis through sonic hedgehog signalling(93). In rats with heart failure, EPO increased VEGF expression predominantly in cardiomyocytes to induce a 37% increase in capillary density and improved cardiac performance(94) but it is unknown whether epicardial activation either directly, or via IGF2 or VEGF, mediates these effects.

Notch signalling

Notch signalling is implicated in establishing arterio-venous identity and in regulating endothelial-mural cell interactions(95). Activation of EC Notch induces arterial marker expression (ephrin B2, CD44 and neuropilin 1) and suppresses venous markers (Eph B4). Within the epicardium, Notch pathways regulate key cardiovascular cell fate decisions. Epicardial notch regulates arterial endothelium commitment and vessel wall maturation, being a crucial regulator of EPDC-SM differentiation, as well as myocardial growth(96,33). Notch induces Pdgfrb expression in EPDCs and cooperates with TGFβ signalling to induce SM genes.

The Notch pathway regulates heart regeneration in zebrafish(97) and is implicated, by virtue of its up-regulation, in repair of the mammalian heart(98). Using a powerful tool for identifying “Notch-activated” progenitors (CBF1-RE(x)4-EGFP), Russell and colleagues revealed an abundance of Notch-activated epicardial-derived progenitor cells (NECs) within the epicardium(99), a population which expanded following MI or thoracic aortic banding (a model of pressure overload hypertrophy and heart failure), consistent with reactivation of Notch signalling following MI and the up-regulation of Notch3 and Notch4 signalling in human heart failure(100).NECs were shown to secrete potent mitogenic and cardiotropic growth factors including Tβ4, PDGF-A, TGF-β3 and -2, BMP-1 and -4 and FGF-7, which can further potentiate epicardial activation. They contributed fibroblasts to the remodelling heart but, under appropriate conditions (cardiomyocyte coculture and engraftment into non-ischaemic heart), revealed a modest epicardial-cardiomyocyte differentiation potential(99). Thus, a dynamic Notch injury response activates adult epicardium, producing a multipotent cell population that contributes to repair. Fibrosis appears to be default programme, but the modest cardiomyocyte differentiation potential may be therapeutically exploited and preferentially enhanced over fibroblast differentiation. A current obstacle is the lack of understanding of the heterogeneity of epicardial cells; distinct populations have been identified based upon their activation stimuli e.g. Notch(99), Tβ4(28) or on expression of epicardial and progenitor marker e.g. WT-1 (28) or c-kit(88) but the extent of overlap in marker profile, stimulatory factors and differentiation potential remains to be characterised and should inform efforts towards exploiting their regenerative potential.

Prokineticin

Prokineticins (PKs) are small, secreted peptides that signal through G protein–coupled receptors, Prokineticin receptor (PKR)-1 and -2(101). In the heart, prokineticin-2 acts via PKR-1 to support coronary vessel development and protect cardiomyocytes after ischaemic injury(101). Overexpression of PKR-1 in the mouse heart increases coronary capillary density, apparently increasing epicardial cell proliferation and potentially influencing their differentiation towards a vascular fate. Interestingly, PK2 and its receptors are elevated for 7 days following murine MI(102). PKR1 in mouse heart up-regulates its own ligand, PK2, which acts as a paracrine signal to promote vasculogenic differentiation of EPDCs(101) and thus PK2 has emerged as a potential therapeutic agent in epicardial-based cardiac repair.

Extracellular Matrix Components

The ECM is a diverse and adaptable network of fibrillar and non-fibrillar proteins with critical signalling functions, regulating proliferation, adhesion and migration and provides mechanical support to enable coordinated cardiomyocyte contraction(103) ECM components include the basic structural proteins collagen and elastin, specialized proteins such as fibronectin, proteoglycans and matricellular proteins including osteopontin, thrombospondin-1/2, tenascin and periostin. While these proteins play a critical role during development, they are maintained at low level expression in normal adult tissue, but are markedly up-regulated during wound healing and tissue remodelling, including MI. The ECM impacts significantly on the epicardium, both during development and disease.

The subepicardial space, situated between the epicardium and myocardium, is rich in fibronectin, collagens (I, IV, V, VI) proteoglycans, laminin, vitronectin, fibrullin, elastin, tenascin-X and flectin (104) and their interaction with epicardial cells provide signals that induce EMT (105). α4 integrin represses EMT, invasion and migration, and additionally influences cell fate, being required for VSMC differentiation rather than the ‘default’ interstitial fibroblast phenotype in its absence (105). Similarly, the transmembrane glycoprotein podoplanin is required for coronary vasculogenesis and is proposed to stimulate EMT by negatively regulating E-cadherin. Subepicardial matrix components change as coronary vasculogenesis proceeds revealing its influence on vascular fate(106). The matrix is initially rich in vitronectin, then fibronectin is deposited to facilitate migration of EPDCs and endothelial precursors(107). Laminin deposition follows, which coincides temporally with endothelial tube formation, and subsequently collagens (type IV first, followed by types I and III) are deposited(108). Fibulin is deposited by the epicardium as it migrates over the heart and is produced by ECs of budding coronary arteries(109).

These changes in matrix composition that occur during development are recapitulated in the adult heart in the extracellular matrix around the regions of active coronary collateral remodelling post-MI(110). The response to MI generates distinct regions within the myocardium, with altered cellular environments(111), following deposition of plasma-derived proteins such as fibronectin and collagen in and around the site of infarction. Collagen, produced primarily by fibroblasts and myofibroblasts, is required to preserve ventricular integrity and prevent cardiac rupture. Osteopontin (OPN), thrombospondin-1/2 (TSP-1/2), tenascin-C/X (TNC/TNX) and periostin are among the matricellular proteins up-regulated following MI(112). The deposition of these proteins proximal to the subepicardial space may contribute towards epicardial reactivation post-MI. Some EPDCs, at least those that, during development, contribute to the annulus fibrosus, were highly enriched for mRNAs encoding periostin, procollagen I, fibronectin I, vimentin and tenascin C(27). It remains to be determined whether this is a property shared by all EPDCs or only those that are required to synthesize structural components of the annulus fibrosus. The possibility that these synthetic properties may be (re)acquired would confer upon EPDCs the ability to remodel their immediate environment, to facilitate their inward migration and influence their differentiation.

TNC is normally only expressed in the chordae tendinae of the adult heart but becomes transiently up-regulated in the infarct border region during MI healing(113) where it is suggested to accelerate adverse ventricular remodelling and fibrosis. Periostin, normally restricted to the valves of the heart, is strongly expressed in cardiac fibroblasts after MI. It binds to αvβ3, αvβ5 and α4β6 integrins, and transduces signals to facilitate EMT and migration(114) and is critically required for myofibroblast recruitment and collagen fibre formation. Modulating α4integrin signalling has been shown to alter EPDC migration and cell fate(105). Whereas periostin deficiency leads to increased incidence of cardiac rupture(115), surviving periostin-deficient mice display reduced fibrosis and significantly improved cardiac performance(115). Interaction of the epicardium with key matrix components such as periostin and TNC may, therefore, play a pivotal role in balancing cardiac remodelling with regeneration consequently the ECM may be targeted therapeutically to manipulate EPDC fate to achieve an optimal contribution of myofibroblasts, cardiomyocytes and vascular progenitors.

Pericardial Fluid

Several bioactive molecules released from the pericardium, epicardium and myocardium become concentrated within the pericardial fluid (PF) to affect epicardial cells, both physiologically and pathophysiologically. Many molecules have been identified in the PF of normal and diseased hearts, with their levels correlating with inflammation, collateral growth and cardiac remodelling(116). Administration of PF into the pericardial cavity of non-infarcted mouse was sufficient to induce epicardial proliferation and embryonic gene expression(88). IGF1, HGF and HMGB1 were significantly elevated in PF from MI patients, factors that induce resident cardiac c-kit+ cells including, but not necessarily limited to, those progenitors within the epicardium that express c-kit. Hypoxia enhances pericardial mesothelial VEGF expression which, in addition to a demonstrated autocrine growth-regulatory role in pericardial cells, will likely signal to activate the adjacent epicardium(117). Thus, PF contains trophic factors which might be harnessed to invoke epicardial activation and repair.

Conclusion and Future Perspective

The epicardial–myocardial signalling that directs coronary vasculogenesis and myocardial growth is complex, with multiple signalling pathways underlying each step and several pathways serving multiple roles. Additional complexity derives from the crosstalk, cooperation and feedback regulation implicit in such systems. The first critical step in coronary development involves the establishment of the epicardium and autocrine signalling (Epo and RA) for induction of cardiomyocyte proliferation and epicardial FGF secretion. FGFs not only stimulate cardiomyocyte proliferation but also induce other growth factors that signal back to the epicardium. Myocardial-epicardial signalling then directs epicardial EMT to generate EPDCs fated to become fibroblasts, cardiomyocytes, VSMCs and perhaps endothelial cells. The Shh-VEGF-Ang2 pathway may influence the generation of ECs, whereas PDGF, Wnt/β-catenin, and TGFβ promote differentiation of coronary VSMCs. Since the epicardium is effectively dormant in adulthood, the first critical step for engaging epicardial involvement in regeneration is its reactivation and restoration of pluripotency. To date, this has been achieved with Tβ4, prokineticin and pericardial fluid. While the search is on-going for more potent compounds with which to reactivate adult epicardium, attention should also be focussed on understanding the intrinsic mechanisms that unfold during the injury response. The potential exists to not only exploit and enhance native signalling pathways to a threshold sufficient to induce meaningful repair but to disentangle detrimentally competing pathways. The ability to relieve the inhibition on pro-regenerative signalling may be sufficient to release the heart’s own healing potential, which is clearly retained, to effect self-repair. A number of injury-induced factors promote EPDC EMT; their failure to do so to a sufficient extent may simply reflect the inability to attain the signal threshold for EMT induction or, equally likely, the presence of a competing signal that maintains epithelial state. Moreover, what potential exists within the adult mammalian epicardium requires therapeutic exploitation to derive maximal regenerative benefits. Beyond EMT the apparent heterogeneity of the adult epicardial lineage needs to be considered, which in turn likely affords alternate cardiovascular cell fates on sub-populations once activated. Epicardial activation in response to injury alone produces principally fibroblast derivatives which may contribute towards the prevailing fibrotic remodelling but fail to restore the remaining myocardial components. Tβ4 increases vascular contribution(6) to the ischaemic heart and even upholds the contribution of epicardium-derived cardiomyocytes(28); nevertheless the response is insufficient to realise significant myocardial regeneration. The potential for a localised response of the mammalian epicardium, as opposed to organ-wide (as in zebrafish), is also a key factor in terms of not only determining which progenitor cells become what, but where, and in response to which key signals along the proximal-distal axis relative to the site of injury. Understanding how injury signals or, as yet unidentified, novel compounds, modulate EPDC fate may enable the development of therapies to supplement a substantial proportion of vascular progenitors and cardiomyocytes to orchestrate a more complete myocardial restoration.

Executive Summary.

Clinical Problem

  • Cardiovascular diseases are the major worldwide cause of mortality and morbidity; consequently there is an urgent need to tackle the clinical and economic burden of heart failure.
    • -
      Coronary heart disease, leading to acute myocardial infarction (MI), is the primary cause of death.

The Need for Regenerative Therapies

  • The mammalian heart is unable to adequately regenerate beyond early postnatal stages.
    • -
      Myocardial healing post-MI consists of replacement of lost muscle with a non-contractile scar, fibrosis and (maladaptive) hypertrophic remodelling.
    • -
      Transplantation is the only known cure, confounded by a lack of donor hearts and host immune rejection.
    • -
      A number of embryonic and adult cell types have been explored for replacement of lost cardiomyocytes while angiogenic therapies have attempted to re-vascularise the ischaemic myocardium. Overall, such approaches have delivered meagre benefits.
    • -
      Recent attention has focussed on the identification of a tractable resident progenitor population within the adult heart.
    • -
      Understanding the embryonic mechanisms of vasculogenesis and cardiogenesis, as well as the mechanisms retained for regeneration in species such as the zebrafish, will inform on strategies for human myocardial repair.

The Epicardium as a Candidate for Regeneration

  • Due to their fundamental role in heart development, the epicardium-derived cells (EPDCs) have emerged as a population with the potential to restore myocardium and coronary vasculature.
    • -
      During development, EPDCs give rise to coronary vascular smooth muscle cells, pericytes, fibroblasts, up to 10% of the heart’s cardiomyocytes and, potentially, a proportion of coronary endothelial cells.
    • -
      A prerequisite for utilising EPDCs for regeneration is the identification of factors to reactivate this ordinarily dormant reservoir of progenitors.
    • -
      Reactivation of the adult epicardium was first revealed using Thymosin β4 (Tβ4) and subsequently prokineticin-2; however, until large-scale small molecule screens yield further insight, we are limited in our ability to pharmacologically stimulate the adult epicardium.

Application of Thymosin β4 to Harness the Regenerative Potential of the Epicardium

  • Tβ4 restores the quiescent adult epicardium to its pluripotent embryonic state
    • -
      The ability of Tβ4 to reactivate the adult epicardium was first revealed in cardiac explant cultures; Tβ4 stimulates EPDC migration and subsequent differentiation into vascular and myocardial progenitors.
    • -
      Tβ4-treated, infarcted hearts revealed dramatic EPDC proliferation and a network of perfused, functional VSMC-lined new vessels.
    • -
      The ability of Tβ4 to reactivate the adult epicardium was exploited in order to restore Wt1 expression (a key embryonic epicardial marker) in the adult lineage and demonstrate the contribution of epicardium-derived myocardial precursors and, subsequently, mature cardiomyocytes following MI. Importantly, the de novo cardiomyocytes were structurally and functionally coupled and may contribute towards the functional recovery of Tβ4-treated hearts post-MI.

Myocardial Injury Signalling: Possible Interaction with the Epicardium

  • The mammalian myocardium responds to stresses by activating adaptive mechanisms to limit cellular injury and to regenerate, as much as possible, the damaged tissue.
    • -
      Myocardial injury is itself sufficient to promote epicardial activation and a degree of neovascularisation
    • -
      While the intrinsic injury response is inadequate to fully repair the adult myocardium, understanding the timing and magnitude of myocardial-epicardial signals, based upon defined embryonic roles, will inform strategies to direct epicardial EMT and proliferation and to influence EPDC fate.
    • -
      Enhancing positive signals and inhibiting repressive stimuli may lead to maximal activation alongside a shift in EPDC fate from predominantly fibroblast towards an adequate quota of cardiomyocytes and vascular precursors.
    • -
      A number of candidate signalling pathways have emerged, which include:
      • Fibroblast Growth Factors
      • Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
      • Angiopoietin Signalling
      • The transforming Growth Factor β family
      • Platelet-Derived Growth Factors
      • Canonical Wnt Signalling
      • Retinoic Acid
      • Erythropoietin
      • Notch signalling
      • Prokineticins
      • Extracellular Matrix Components
    • -
      Signalling components of these pathways are up-regulated and secreted from injured myocardium, or the reactivated epicardium. Additional factors that may potentiate activation of the epicardium may be derived from
      • Infiltrating inflammatory cells
      • Platelets
      • Damaged and activated vascular cells
      • Infiltrating fibroblasts
      • Progenitor cells mobilized from the bone marrow
      • Changes to the extracellular matrix

Therapeutic Perspective

  • Being essentially dormant in adult, the first critical step for engaging the regenerative potential of the epicardium is reactivation and restoration of pluripotency.
    • -
      The search is on-going for potent compounds with which to reactivate adult epicardium; starting with candidate signals which function to ensure epicardium development and contribution of cardiovascular cell types in the embryonic heart.
    • -
      Understanding the intrinsic signalling mechanisms that activate the epicardium post-MI will inform the development of novel therapies.

Recognizing how injury signals or, as yet unidentified, novel compounds modulate EPDC fate should enable the therapeutic activation of myocardial regeneration over maladaptive remodelling.

References

  • 1.Porrello ER, Mahmoud AI, Simpson E, et al. Transient regenerative potential of the neonatal mouse heart. Science. 2011;331(6020):1078–1080. doi: 10.1126/science.1200708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jameel MN, Zhang J. Heart failure management: the present and the future. Antioxid.Redox.Signal. 2009;11(8):1989–2010. doi: 10.1089/ars.2009.2488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rapti K, Chaanine AH, Hajjar RJ. Targeted gene therapy for the treatment of heart failure. Can.J.Cardiol. 2011;27(3):265–283. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2011.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Murry CE, Reinecke H, Pabon LM. Regeneration gaps: observations on stem cells and cardiac repair. J Am Coll.Cardiol. 2006;47(9):1777–1785. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Laflamme MA, Murry CE. Heart regeneration. Nature. 2011;473(7347):326–335. doi: 10.1038/nature10147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Smart N, Risebro CA, Clark JE, et al. Thymosin beta4 facilitates epicardial neovascularization of the injured adult heart. Ann.N.Y.Acad.Sci. 2010;1194:97–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05478.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Laugwitz KL, Moretti A, Caron L, Nakano A, Chien KR. Islet1 cardiovascular progenitors: a single source for heart lineages? Development. 2008;135(2):193–205. doi: 10.1242/dev.001883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tomanek RJ. Formation of the coronary vasculature during development. Angiogenesis. 2005;8(3):273–284. doi: 10.1007/s10456-005-9014-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Manner J. Experimental study on the formation of the epicardium in chick embryos. Anat.Embryol.(Berl) 1993;187(3):281–289. doi: 10.1007/BF00195766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mikawa T, Gourdie RG. Pericardial Mesoderm Generates a Population of Coronary Smooth Muscle Cells Migrating into the Heart along with Ingrowth of the Epicardial Organ. Developmental Biology. 1996;174(2):221–232. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1996.0068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wessels A, Perez-Pomares JM. The epicardium and epicardially derived cells (EPDCs) as cardiac stem cells. Anat.Rec.A Discov.Mol.Cell Evol.Biol. 2004;276(1):43–57. doi: 10.1002/ar.a.10129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Perez-Pomares JM, Carmona R, Gonzalez-Iriarte M, Atencia G, Wessels A, Munoz-Chapuli R. Origin of coronary endothelial cells from epicardial mesothelium in avian embryos. Int.J Dev.Biol. 2002;46(8):1005–1013. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gittenberger-de Groot AC, Vrancken Peeters MP, Mentink MMT, Gourdie RG, Poelmann RE. Epicardium-Derived Cells Contribute a Novel Population to the Myocardial Wall and the Atrioventricular Cushions. Circulation Research. 1998;82(10):1043–1052. doi: 10.1161/01.res.82.10.1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Manner J. Does the subepicardial mesenchyme contribute myocardioblasts to the myocardium of the chick embryo heart? A quail-chick chimera study tracing the fate of the epicardial primordium. Anat.Rec. 1999;255(2):212–226. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0185(19990601)255:2<212::aid-ar11>3.3.co;2-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Winter EM, Gittenberger-de Groot AC. Epicardium-derived cells in cardiogenesis and cardiac regeneration. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2007;64(6):692–703. doi: 10.1007/s00018-007-6522-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dettman RW, Denetclaw W, Jr., Ordahl CP, Bristow J. Common epicardial origin of coronary vascular smooth muscle, perivascular fibroblasts, and intermyocardial fibroblasts in the avian heart. Dev.Biol. 1998;193(2):169–181. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1997.8801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhou B, Ma Q, Rajagopal S, et al. Epicardial progenitors contribute to the cardiomyocyte lineage in the developing heart. Nature. 2008;454(7200):109–113. doi: 10.1038/nature07060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cai CL, Martin JC, Sun Y, et al. A myocardial lineage derives from Tbx18 epicardial cells. Nature. 2008;454(7200):104–108. doi: 10.1038/nature06969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Christoffels VM, Grieskamp T, Norden J, Mommersteeg MT, Rudat C, Kispert A. Tbx18 and the fate of epicardial progenitors. Nature. 2009;458(7240):E8–E9. doi: 10.1038/nature07916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kispert A. No muscle for a damaged heart: Thymosin beta 4 treatment after myocardial infarction does not induce myocardial differentiation of epicardial cells. J.Mol.Cell Cardiol. 2011 doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2011.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schmidt-Supprian M, Rajewsky K. Vagaries of conditional gene targeting. Nat.Immunol. 2007;8(7):665–668. doi: 10.1038/ni0707-665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Riley PR, Smart N. Vascularizing the heart. Cardiovasc.Res. 2011;91(2):260–268. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvr035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zamora M, Manner J, Ruiz-Lozano P. Epicardium-derived progenitor cells require beta-catenin for coronary artery formation. Proc.Natl.Acad Sci U.S.A. 2007;104(46):18109–18114. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702415104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zeng B, Ren XF, Cao F, Zhou XY, Zhang J. Developmental patterns and characteristics of epicardial cell markers Tbx18 and Wt1 in murine embryonic heart. J.Biomed.Sci. 2011;18:67. doi: 10.1186/1423-0127-18-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhou B, Honor LB, Ma Q, et al. Thymosin beta 4 treatment after myocardial infarction does not reprogram epicardial cells into cardiomyocytes. J.Mol.Cell Cardiol. 2011 doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2011.08.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhou B, Honor LB, He H, et al. Adult mouse epicardium modulates myocardial injury by secreting paracrine factors. J.Clin.Invest. 2011;121(5):1894–1904. doi: 10.1172/JCI45529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhou B, von GA, Ma Q, Hu YW, Pu WT. Genetic fate mapping demonstrates contribution of epicardium-derived cells to the annulus fibrosis of the mammalian heart. Dev.Biol. 2010;338(2):251–261. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Smart N, Bollini S, Dube KN, et al. De novo cardiomyocytes from within the activated adult heart after injury. Nature. 2011;474:640–644. doi: 10.1038/nature10188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kikuchi K, Gupta V, Wang J, et al. tcf21+ epicardial cells adopt non-myocardial fates during zebrafish heart development and regeneration. Development. 2011;138(14):2895–2902. doi: 10.1242/dev.067041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mikawa T, Fischman DA. Retroviral analysis of cardiac morphogenesis: discontinuous formation of coronary vessels. Proc.Natl.Acad Sci U.S.A. 1992;89(20):9504–9508. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.20.9504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Poelmann RE, Lie-Venema H, Gittenberger-de Groot AC. The role of the epicardium and neural crest as extracardiac contributors to coronary vascular development. Tex.Heart Inst.J. 2002;29(4):255–261. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Red-Horse K, Ueno H, Weissman IL, Krasnow MA. Coronary arteries form by developmental reprogramming of venous cells. Nature. 2010;464(7288):549–553. doi: 10.1038/nature08873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Grieskamp T, Rudat C, Ludtke TH, Norden J, Kispert A. Notch signaling regulates smooth muscle differentiation of epicardium-derived cells. Circ.Res. 2011;108(7):813–823. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.228809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Luttun A, Carmeliet P. De novo vasculogenesis in the heart. Cardiovascular Research. 2003;58(2):378–389. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(03)00258-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kang JO, Sucov HM. Convergent proliferative response and divergent morphogenic pathways induced by epicardial and endocardial signaling in fetal heart development. Mechanisms of Development. 2005;122(1):57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.mod.2004.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lavine KJ, Yu K, White AC, et al. Endocardial and epicardial derived FGF signals regulate myocardial proliferation and differentiation in vivo. Dev.Cell. 2005;8(1):85–95. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Morabito CJ, Dettman RW, Kattan J, Collier JM, Bristow J. Positive and Negative Regulation of Epicardial-Mesenchymal Transformation during Avian Heart Development. Developmental Biology. 2001;234(1):204–215. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2001.0254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wills AA, Holdway JE, Major RJ, Poss KD. Regulated addition of new myocardial and epicardial cells fosters homeostatic cardiac growth and maintenance in adult zebrafish. Development. 2007 doi: 10.1242/dev.010363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Eid H, Larson DM, Springhorn JP, et al. Role of epicardial mesothelial cells in the modification of phenotype and function of adult rat ventricular myocytes in primary coculture. Circ.Res. 1992;71(1):40–50. doi: 10.1161/01.res.71.1.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lepilina A, Coon AN, Kikuchi K, et al. A Dynamic Epicardial Injury Response Supports Progenitor Cell Activity during Zebrafish Heart Regeneration. Cell. 2006;127(3):607–619. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lien CL, Schebesta M, Makino S, Weber GJ, Keating MT. Gene Expression Analysis of Zebrafish Heart Regeneration. PLoS Biol. 2006;4(8) doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kim J, Wu Q, Zhang Y, et al. PDGF signaling is required for epicardial function and blood vessel formation in regenerating zebrafish hearts. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A. 2010;107(40):17206–17210. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0915016107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kikuchi K, Holdway JE, Werdich AA, et al. Primary contribution to zebrafish heart regeneration by gata4(+) cardiomyocytes. Nature. 2010;464(7288):601–605. doi: 10.1038/nature08804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jopling C, Sleep E, Raya M, Marti M, Raya A, Belmonte JC. Zebrafish heart regeneration occurs by cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation and proliferation. Nature. 2010;464(7288):606–609. doi: 10.1038/nature08899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rentschler S, Epstein JA. Kicking the epicardium up a notch. Circ.Res. 2011;108(1):6–8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.237297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Richard V, Murry CE, Reimer KA. Healing of myocardial infarcts in dogs. Effects of late reperfusion. Circulation. 1995;92(7):1891–1901. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.7.1891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Winter EM, Grauss RW, Hogers B, et al. Preservation of left ventricular function and attenuation of remodeling after transplantation of human epicardium-derived cells into the infarcted mouse heart. Circulation. 2007;116(8):917–927. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.668178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Smart N, Risebro CA, Melville AAD, et al. Thymosin β4 induces adult epicardial progenitor mobilization and neovascularization. Nature. 2007;445(7124):177–182. doi: 10.1038/nature05383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bock-Marquette I, Shrivastava S, Pipes GC, et al. Thymosin beta4 mediated PKC activation is essential to initiate the embryonic coronary developmental program and epicardial progenitor cell activation in adult mice in vivo. J.Mol.Cell Cardiol. 2009;46(5):728–738. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.01.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bock-Marquette I, Saxena A, White MD, Dimaio JM, Srivastava D. Thymosin β4 activates integrin-linked kinase and promotes cardiac cell migration, survival and cardiac repair. Nature. 2004;432(7016):466–472. doi: 10.1038/nature03000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Porrello ER, Mahmoud AI, Simpson E, et al. Transient regenerative potential of the neonatal mouse heart. Science. 2011;331(6020):1078–1080. doi: 10.1126/science.1200708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Smart N, Riley PR. The stem cell movement. Circ Res. 2008;102(10):1155–1168. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.175158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tomanek RJ, Zheng W, Peters KG, Lin P, Holifield JS, Suvarna PR. Multiple growth factors regulate coronary embryonic vasculogenesis. Dev.Dyn. 2001;221(3):265–273. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.1137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Olivey HE, Svensson EC. Epicardial-myocardial signaling directing coronary vasculogenesis. Circ.Res. 2010;106(5):818–832. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.209197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zhao T, Zhao W, Chen Y, Ahokas RA, Sun Y. Acidic and basic fibroblast growth factors involved in cardiac angiogenesis following infarction. Int.J.Cardiol. 2010 doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.07.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Xu J, Lawshe A, MacArthur CA, Ornitz DM. Genomic structure, mapping, activity and expression of fibroblast growth factor 17. Mech.Dev. 1999;83(1-2):165–178. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(99)00034-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Iwakura A, Fujita M, Ikemoto M, et al. Myocardial ischemia enhances the expression of acidic fibroblast growth factor in human pericardial fluid. Heart Vessels. 2000;15(3):112–116. doi: 10.1007/pl00007264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Fujita M, Ikemoto M, Kishishita M, et al. Elevated basic fibroblast growth factor in pericardial fluid of patients with unstable angina. Circulation. 1996;94(4):610–613. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.4.610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Tammela T, Enholm B, Alitalo K, Paavonen K. The biology of vascular endothelial growth factors. Cardiovascular Research. 2005;65(3):550–563. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lavine KJ, White AC, Park C, et al. Fibroblast growth factor signals regulate a wave of Hedgehog activation that is essential for coronary vascular development. Genes Dev. 2006;20(12):1651–1666. doi: 10.1101/gad.1411406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Li J, Brown LF, Hibberd MG, Grossman JD, Morgan JP, Simons M. VEGF, flk-1, and flt-1 expression in a rat myocardial infarction model of angiogenesis. Am J Physiol. 1996;270(5 Pt 2):H1803–H1811. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1996.270.5.H1803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Yang Z, von Ballmoos MW, Faessler D, et al. Paracrine factors secreted by endothelial progenitor cells prevent oxidative stress-induced apoptosis of mature endothelial cells. Atherosclerosis. 2010;211(1):103–109. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.02.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Takahashi M, Li TS, Suzuki R, et al. Cytokines produced by bone marrow cells can contribute to functional improvement of the infarcted heart by protecting cardiomyocytes from ischemic injury. Am.J.Physiol Heart Circ.Physiol. 2006;291(2):H886–H893. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00142.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Henry TD, Annex BH, McKendall GR, et al. The VIVA Trial: Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Ischemia for Vascular Angiogenesis. Circulation. 2003;107(10):1359–1365. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000061911.47710.8a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ward NL, Van SP, Sturk C, Cruz M, Dumont DJ. Angiopoietin 1 expression levels in the myocardium direct coronary vessel development. Dev.Dyn. 2004;229(3):500–509. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.10479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Visconti RP, Richardson CD, Sato TN. Orchestration of angiogenesis and arteriovenous contribution by angiopoietins and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A. 2002;99(12):8219–8224. doi: 10.1073/pnas.122109599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Shyu KG, Chang CC, Wang BW, Kuan P, Chang H. Increased expression of angiopoietin-2 and Tie2 receptor in a rat model of myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion. Clin.Sci.(Lond) 2003;105(3):287–294. doi: 10.1042/CS20030025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Goumans MJ, Valdimarsdottir G, Itoh S, Rosendahl A, Sideras P, ten DP. Balancing the activation state of the endothelium via two distinct TGF-beta type I receptors. EMBO J. 2002;21(7):1743–1753. doi: 10.1093/emboj/21.7.1743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Craig EA, Austin AF, Vaillancourt RR, Barnett JV, Camenisch TD. TGFbeta2-mediated production of hyaluronan is important for the induction of epicardial cell differentiation and invasion. Exp.Cell Res. 2010;316(20):3397–3405. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Olivey HE, Mundell NA, Austin AF, Barnett JV. Transforming growth factor-beta stimulates epithelial-mesenchymal transformation in the proepicardium. Dev.Dyn. 2006;235(1):50–59. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.20593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Bax NA, van Oorschot AA, Maas S, et al. In vitro epithelial-to-mesenchymal transformation in human adult epicardial cells is regulated by TGFbeta-signaling and WT1. Basic Res.Cardiol. 2011;106(5):829–847. doi: 10.1007/s00395-011-0181-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Compton LA, Potash DA, Brown CB, Barnett JV. Coronary vessel development is dependent on the type III transforming growth factor beta receptor. Circ Res. 2007;101(8):784–791. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.152082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Bujak M, Frangogiannis NG. The role of TGF-beta signaling in myocardial infarction and cardiac remodeling. Cardiovasc.Res. 2007;74(2):184–195. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Vilahur G, Juan-Babot O, Pena E, Onate B, Casani L, Badimon L. Molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in cardiac remodeling after acute myocardial infarction. J.Mol.Cell Cardiol. 2011;50(3):522–533. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2010.12.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Yoon SJ, Fang YH, Lim CH, et al. Regeneration of ischemic heart using hyaluronic acid-based injectable hydrogel. J.Biomed.Mater.Res.B Appl.Biomater. 2009;91(1):163–171. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Shinbrot E, Peters KG, Williams LT. Expression of the platelet-derived growth factor beta receptor during organogenesis and tissue differentiation in the mouse embryo. Dev.Dyn. 1994;199(3):169–175. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001990302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Takakura N, Yoshida H, Ogura Y, Kataoka H, Nishikawa S, Nishikawa S. PDGFR alpha expression during mouse embryogenesis: immunolocalization analyzed by whole-mount immunohistostaining using the monoclonal anti-mouse PDGFR alpha antibody APA5. J.Histochem.Cytochem. 1997;45(6):883–893. doi: 10.1177/002215549704500613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Bax NA, Bleyl SB, Gallini R, et al. Cardiac malformations in Pdgfralpha mutant embryos are associated with increased expression of WT1 and Nkx2.5 in the second heart field. Dev.Dyn. 2010;239(8):2307–2317. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.22363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Lu J, Landerholm TE, Wei JS, et al. Coronary Smooth Muscle Differentiation from Proepicardial Cells Requires RhoA-Mediated Actin Reorganization and p160 Rho-Kinase Activity. Developmental Biology. 2001;240(2):404–418. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2001.0403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Zymek P, Bujak M, Chatila K, et al. The role of platelet-derived growth factor signaling in healing myocardial infarcts. J.Am.Coll.Cardiol. 2006;48(11):2315–2323. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.07.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Zhao W, Zhao T, Huang V, Chen Y, Ahokas RA, Sun Y. Platelet-derived growth factor involvement in myocardial remodeling following infarction. J.Mol.Cell Cardiol. 2011 doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2011.06.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Tahara A, Yasuda M, Itagane H, et al. Plasma levels of platelet-derived growth factor in normal subjects and patients with ischemic heart disease. Am.Heart J. 1991;122(4 Pt 1):986–992. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(91)90462-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Mogan C, Larson DF. Rationale of platelet gel to augment adaptive remodeling of the injured heart. J.Extra.Corpor.Technol. 2004;36(2):191–196. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Cliffe A, Hamada F, Bienz M. A role of Dishevelled in relocating Axin to the plasma membrane during wingless signaling. Curr.Biol. 2003;13(11):960–966. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00370-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Mayorga ME, Penn MS. miR-145 is differentially regulated by TGFbeta1 and ischemia and targets disabled-2 expression and wnt/beta-catenin activity. J.Cell Mol.Med. 2011 doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01385.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Merki E, Zamora M, Raya A, et al. Epicardial retinoid X receptor α is required for myocardial growth and coronary artery formation. PNAS. 2005;102(51):18455–18460. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504343102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Azambuja AP, Portillo-Sanchez V, Rodrigues MV, et al. Retinoic acid and VEGF delay smooth muscle relative to endothelial differentiation to coordinate inner and outer coronary vessel wall morphogenesis. Circ.Res. 2010;107(2):204–216. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.214650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Limana F, Bertolami C, Mangoni A, et al. Myocardial infarction induces embryonic reprogramming of epicardial c-kit(+) cells: role of the pericardial fluid. J.Mol.Cell Cardiol. 2010;48(4):609–618. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kikuchi K, Holdway JE, Major RJ, et al. Retinoic Acid production by endocardium and epicardium is an injury response essential for zebrafish heart regeneration. Dev.Cell. 2011;20(3):397–404. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.01.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Wu H, Lee SH, Gao J, Liu X, Iruela-Arispe ML. Inactivation of erythropoietin leads to defects in cardiac morphogenesis. Development. 1999;126(16):3597–3605. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.16.3597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Stuckmann I, Evans S, Lassar AB. Erythropoietin and retinoic acid, secreted from the epicardium, are required for cardiac myocyte proliferation. Dev.Biol. 2003;255(2):334–349. doi: 10.1016/s0012-1606(02)00078-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Brade T, Kumar S, Cunningham TJ, et al. Retinoic acid stimulates myocardial expansion by induction of hepatic erythropoietin which activates epicardial Igf2. Development. 2011;138(1):139–148. doi: 10.1242/dev.054239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Ueda K, Takano H, Niitsuma Y, et al. Sonic hedgehog is a critical mediator of erythropoietin-induced cardiac protection in mice. J.Clin.Invest. 2010;120(6):2016–2029. doi: 10.1172/JCI39896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Westenbrink BD, Ruifrok WP, Voors AA, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor is crucial for erythropoietin-induced improvement of cardiac function in heart failure. Cardiovasc.Res. 2010;87(1):30–39. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvq041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Sainson RC, Harris AL. Regulation of angiogenesis by homotypic and heterotypic notch signalling in endothelial cells and pericytes: from basic research to potential therapies. Angiogenesis. 2008;11(1):41–51. doi: 10.1007/s10456-008-9098-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.del MG, Casanova JC, Guadix JA, et al. Differential Notch signaling in the epicardium is required for cardiac inflow development and coronary vessel morphogenesis. Circ.Res. 2011;108(7):824–836. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.229062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Raya A, Koth CM, Buscher D, et al. Activation of Notch signaling pathway precedes heart regeneration in zebrafish. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A. 2003;100(Suppl 1):11889–11895. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1834204100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Croquelois A, Domenighetti AA, Nemir M, et al. Control of the adaptive response of the heart to stress via the Notch1 receptor pathway. J.Exp.Med. 2008;205(13):3173–3185. doi: 10.1084/jem.20081427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Russell JL, Goetsch SC, Gaiano NR, Hill JA, Olson EN, Schneider JW. A dynamic notch injury response activates epicardium and contributes to fibrosis repair. Circ.Res. 2011;108(1):51–59. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.233262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Kratsios P, Catela C, Salimova E, et al. Distinct roles for cell-autonomous Notch signaling in cardiomyocytes of the embryonic and adult heart. Circ.Res. 2010;106(3):559–572. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.203034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Urayama K, Guilini C, Turkeri G, et al. Prokineticin receptor-1 induces neovascularization and epicardial-derived progenitor cell differentiation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008;28(5):841–849. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.162404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Boulberdaa M, Urayama K, Nebigil CG. Prokineticin receptor-1 (PKR1) signaling in cardiovascular and kidney functions. Cardiovasc.Res. 2011 doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvr228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Fomovsky GM, Thomopoulos S, Holmes JW. Contribution of extracellular matrix to the mechanical properties of the heart. J.Mol.Cell Cardiol. 2010;48(3):490–496. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Lie-Venema H, Van Den Akker NM, Bax NA, et al. Origin, fate, and function of epicardium-derived cells (EPDCs) in normal and abnormal cardiac development. ScientificWorldJournal. 2007;7:1777–1798. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2007.294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Dettman RW, Pae S, Morabito C, Bristow J. Inhibition of [alpha]4-integrin stimulates epicardial-mesenchymal transformation and alters migration and cell fate of epicardially derived mesenchyme. Developmental Biology. 2003;257(2):315–328. doi: 10.1016/s0012-1606(03)00064-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Manner J, Perez-Pomares JM, Macias D, Munoz-Chapuli R. The origin, formation and developmental significance of the epicardium: a review. Cells Tissues.Organs. 2001;169(2):89–103. doi: 10.1159/000047867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Adams JC, Watt FM. Regulation of development and differentiation by the extracellular matrix. Development. 1993;117(4):1183–1198. doi: 10.1242/dev.117.4.1183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Rongish BJ, Hinchman G, Doty MK, Baldwin HS, Tomanek RJ. Relationship of the extracellular matrix to coronary neovascularization during development. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1996;28(10):2203–2215. doi: 10.1006/jmcc.1996.0212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Morabito CJ, Kattan J, Bristow J. Mechanisms of embryonic coronary artery development. Curr.Opin.Cardiol. 2002;17(3):235–241. doi: 10.1097/00001573-200205000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Tyagi SC. Vasculogenesis and angiogenesis: extracellular matrix remodeling in coronary collateral arteries and the ischemic heart. J Cell Biochem. 1997;65(3):388–394. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.McCurdy SM, Dai Q, Zhang J, et al. SPARC mediates early extracellular matrix remodeling following myocardial infarction. Am.J.Physiol Heart Circ.Physiol. 2011;301(2):H497–H505. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01070.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Matsui Y, Morimoto J, Uede T. Role of matricellular proteins in cardiac tissue remodeling after myocardial infarction. World J.Biol.Chem. 2010;1(5):69–80. doi: 10.4331/wjbc.v1.i5.69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Willems IE, Arends JW, Daemen MJ. Tenascin and fibronectin expression in healing human myocardial scars. J.Pathol. 1996;179(3):321–325. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199607)179:3<321::AID-PATH555>3.0.CO;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Gillan L, Matei D, Fishman DA, Gerbin CS, Karlan BY, Chang DD. Periostin secreted by epithelial ovarian carcinoma is a ligand for alpha(V)beta(3) and alpha(V)beta(5) integrins and promotes cell motility. Cancer Res. 2002;62(18):5358–5364. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Oka T, Xu J, Kaiser RA, et al. Genetic manipulation of periostin expression reveals a role in cardiac hypertrophy and ventricular remodeling. Circ.Res. 2007;101(3):313–321. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.149047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Limana F, Capogrossi MC, Germani A. The epicardium in cardiac repair: from the stem cell view. Pharmacol.Ther. 2011;129(1):82–96. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2010.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Hatakeyama M, Imaizumi T, Sakaki H, et al. Interleukin-1 induces the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in human pericardial mesothelial cells. Heart Vessels. 2007;22(2):123–127. doi: 10.1007/s00380-006-0942-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES