Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 7.
Published in final edited form as: Sci Total Environ. 2011 Nov 26;429:76–91. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.08.051

Arsenic Exposure in Latin America: Biomarkers, Risk Assessments and Related Health Effects

Tyler R McClintock 1, Yu Chen 2, Jochen Bundschuh 3,4, John T Oliver 5, Julio Navoni 6, Valentina Olmos 6, Edda Villaamil Lepori 6, Habibul Ahsan 7,8, Faruque Parvez 9,10
PMCID: PMC3977337  NIHMSID: NIHMS462266  PMID: 22119448

Abstract

In Latin America, several regions have a long history of widespread arsenic (As) contamination from both natural and anthropological sources. Yet, relatively little is known about the extent of As exposure from drinking water and its related health consequences in these countries. It has been estimated that at least 4.5 million people in Latin America are chronically exposed to high levels of As (>50µg/L), some to as high as 2000 µg/L - 200 times higher than the World Health Organization (WHO) provisional standard for drinking water. We conducted a systematic review of 82 peer reviewed papers and reports to fully explore the current understanding of As exposure and its health effects, as well as the influence of genetic factors that modulate those effects in the populations of Latin America. Despite some methodological limitations, these studies suggested important links between high levels of chronic As exposure and elevated risks of numerous adverse health outcomes in Latin America - including internal and external cancers, reproductive outcomes, and childhood cognitive function. Several studies demonstrated genetic polymorphisms that influence susceptibility to these and other disease states through their modulation of As metabolism, with As methyltransferase (AS3MT), glutathione S-transferase (GST), and genes of one-carbon metabolism being specifically implicated. While the full extent and nature of the health burden are yet to be known in Latin America, these studies have significantly enriched knowledge of As toxicity and led to subsequent research. Targeted future studies will not only yield a better understanding of the public health impact of As in Latin America populations, but also allow for effective and timely mitigation efforts.

Keywords: Arsenic, water, Latin America, exposure, health, cancer, bladder, lung

1. Introduction

Arsenic (As) exposure has likely been a longstanding problem in Latin America, with mummified bodies in Chile showing signs of As exposure from as long as 7000 years ago (Arriaza et al., 2010). In many Latin American countries, soil and groundwater are highly enriched with As due to its high density in the region’s abundant volcanic rock and ash. In some countries, mining operations and copper foundries have unearthed As and enhanced its release into groundwater sources for the past few centuries (Ng et al., 2003). Common features of geography and contamination allow Latin America to be classified into three distinct regions: the Chaco-Pampean plain, Andean range, and Central America. While each of these areas has their own defining characteristics, they share the common burden of having been affected by inorganic As transport into drinking water. High concentrations of As have been found in all sources of drinking water in Latin America, including lake, spring, river and ground water (Castro de Esparza, 2009a; Concha et al., 2010). Though this widespread contamination from both natural and anthropological sources has long been a threat to human health in Latin America, relatively little is known about occurrence, distribution, and exposed populations in countries other than Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Mexico. Only recently has data begun to emerge from such Central American countries as Nicaragua and El Salvador (Cuevas and Bundschuh, 2010). Despite this relative lack of detailed exposure data, it is estimated that at least 4.5 million people in Latin America are currently drinking As contaminated water (>50µg/L), with some recorded levels as high as 2000 µg/L - roughly 200 times higher than the current World Health Organization (WHO) standard (10µg/L) for drinking water (Farías et al., 2008; WHO, 2003).

Arsenic in drinking water causes a number of adverse health effects, including skin lesions that often appear relatively soon after exposure (within 5–15 years of exposure). Long term As exposure damages several internal organs and has been linked to bladder, lung, and skin cancers. Though evidence of As-related disease in Latin America was first described in the 1920s (Goyenechea, 1917), more systematically gathered data on adverse health effects did not emerge until the mid 1970s. In the mid 1970s, elevated mortality and incidence of respiratory disease from As exposure were observed in the endemic areas of Chile (Borgoño et al., 1977; Rosenberg, 1974; Zaldivar, 1980; Zaldivar and Ghai, 1980). Since the 1990s, research from Chile, Argentina and Mexico has demonstrated malignant and non-malignant effects of As exposure. Though much of the findings were based on retrospective case-control or ecological studies that lacked individual exposure data, consistent association was found between high As concentration and the risk of lung and bladder cancer (Hopenhayn-Rich et al., 1996a; Smith et al., 2006). Recent epidemiologic investigations have found a long latency period for lung cancer and other As-related chronic diseases, even when exposure was limited to a discrete period either during early childhood or in utero (Smith et al., 2006). Exposure during these times has also been implicated in adverse reproductive outcomes in mothers and impaired cognitive development in children (Hopenhayn-Rich et al., 2000; Hopenhayn et al., 2003a). Recent studies have examined the possible mechanisms of toxicity that bring about these adverse health outcomes, including genotoxicity, oxidative stress, and impaired DNA repair (Dulout et al., 1996; Engstrom et al., 2007; Engstrom et al., 2009; Engstrom et al., 2010).

A number of studies in Latin America have not only helped to establish the link between As exposure and these health outcomes, but also explored the underlying exposure-disease mechanisms and individual susceptibility. Research in Argentina has focused mainly on bladder cancer, describing increased risks and, more recently, exploring how it could be related to susceptibility markers such as Transforming Growth Factor-α (TGF-α) (Valenzuela et al., 2007), polymorphic influences on metabolism (Moore et al., 2004), and exposure-induced chromosomal aberrations (Moore et al., 2002). South American studies related to lung cancer have taken place largely in Chile, reporting an increase in disease risk from discrete childhood exposure (Smith et al., 2006) and exploring the effect of genetic polymorphisms (Steinmaus et al., 2006). Mexico has been a focus for research on As-related skin disease (Valenzuela et al., 2007), including studies on influence of metabolism (Loffredo et al., 2003), DNA damage (Engstrom et al., 2010), and genetic polymorphisms (Sampayo-Reyes et al., 2010).

In addition to drinking water, food is another source of As in Latin American countries. A few studies from As endemic areas in Latin America have indicated that food contributes up to 50% of total As intake (Del Razo et al., 2002; Diaz et al., 2004; Navoni JA et al., 2007; Queirolo et al., 2000). High amount of As has been detected in fish, cow milk, grains and vegetables including potato, onion, beet, pumpkin, radish, cabbage and beans in Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador, El Salvador, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua and Peru. Cow milk from Argentina and Mexico are shown to have As (Sigrist et al., 2010). At lest two studies from Chile and Brazil have found high amount of As in different species of fish that exceeds FAO/WHO recommended value and current guideline set by Brazil (Lavanchy Dougnac, 1999) (Macedo, 2010). Food preparation with As contaminated water has also found to increase As content in cooked food (Ackerman et al., 2005; Munoz et al., 2002; Navoni JA et al., 2007; Vélez et al., 1997). In order to reduce risk of As exposure and accurately assess As exposure, As contamination from food needs to be given more attention. Please see the paper on As contamination from food in Latin American counties in this issue of the journal (Bundschuh et al., 2011, paper 8). This paper will first describe the historical and current occurrence of As exposure throughout Latin America. That will lead to a review of studies on how As is metabolized in the human body and the various biological markers that exist to measure exposure and metabolism. Based on our review of 82 peer reviewed papers and reports, we then describe specific health outcomes in Latin America, noting the work that has been done to establish general causality, as well as efforts that have been made to understand how these specific diseases are induced. There will be a separate description of studies that investigates general biochemical changes in disease induction, including any modifying effects of genetic variations and biomarkers. This paper closes by placing all prior work in perspective and using it as a context for discussing the future direction of As research in Latin America.

2. Methods

We have conducted an extensive electronic database search from Europe and United States for peer reviewed papers published on As and health related topics from Latin American countries. The following electronic databases have been used for the literature review of this paper: PubMed (1949-July 2010), TOXLINE (1965-July 2010), Biological Abstracts (1969 to July 2010), the Cochrane Library (through July 2010), LILACS (through July 2010), SCOPUS (through July 2010), Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (1981-July 2010), Electronic Library Online (SciELO) and Secretary of Environment of Argentina (SADS) databases. Each database was systematically searched using the following terms (matching terms in title or abstract fields, if available, or otherwise in “all fields” or similar): ‘arsenic’ and ‘name of the country’(i.e., Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Paraguay, Peru, Suriname, Uruguay, Venezuela, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua , Panama, Mexico, El Salvador, Costa Rica, French Guiana, Latin America, South America, or Central America). When the results from a particular database included many items unrelated to health effects, additional terms were added (with AND) to narrow search results. These terms were ‘health effect,’ ‘cancer,’ ‘lung disease,’ ‘cardiovascular disease,’ ‘biomarker,’ or ‘metabolites.’ Since the initial search strategy retrieved any item that included the term ‘arsenic,’ these added terms helped improve the proportion of relevant articles in our search result sets.

Where appropriate—i.e., in PubMed and CINAHL—the searches also included controlled vocabulary terms from PubMed’s Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)(i.e., Arsenic Poisoning, South America, Latin America, Central America and CINAHL Headings (Latin America, South America, Central America, or Mexico). We reviewed the titles and abstracts of all identified materials to judge relevance to the topic. For all possibly relevant items, we collected citations and retrieved full text for all the studies where full text was available. Relevance was assessed in terms of whether each study was original research, focused on Latin American human populations, involved with drinking water As exposure, and related to either health outcomes, disease processes, or biomarkers. Of the 1,651 items reviewed (964 unique items), we eventually included 58 reports in this review. An additional 24 reports were added to the review based on authors’ knowledge of relevant materials. A total of 82 peer reviewed and published articles either in meeting proceedings or in the format of published articles (indexed) have been included in this review.

3. History, occurrence, distribution and exposed population to arsenic from drinking water in Latin American countries

An estimated four and a half million people in Latin American countries are chronically exposed to high levels of As in drinking water, based on the 50 µg/L value which is still the regulatory limit in many of the Latin American countries (Castro de Esparza, 2009a). In some parts of Latin America, a vast majority of wells (>80%) exceed the World Health Organization (WHO) recommending safe limit for drinking water As (10 µg/L) (Nicolli et al., 1989). This widespread contamination is due primarily to release of As from volcanic rocks and their sediments into drinking and irrigation water, a process that is expedited by gold and silver mining activities. To a lesser extent, As-based pesticides and wood preservation agents also contribute to Latin America’s water contamination (Bhattacharya et al., 2006; Bundschuh et al., 2004). Anthropogenic sources of As contamination are of concern in certain countries, including that from the mining and electric reefing industries in Brazil and As-containing pesticides in Mexico (Castro de Esparza, 2009a; Matschullat et al., 2007; Matschullat et al., 2000).

Extremely high As levels have been detected in nearly all possible drinking water sources of many Latin American countries (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Peru, and Uruguay), seriously minimizing safe water options while increasing the number of people at risk of As exposure. Though high levels of As in drinking water were detected a few centuries ago, very little information on human exposure is available from the majority of these countries.

Occurrence and distribution of As in Latin America can be clustered according to three geological or geographical regions, as follows (Bundschuh et al., 2010b):

Andes and Chaco-Pampean Plains: Argentina, Chile and Uruguay, Bolivia, Peru, Colombia, and Ecuador

In Argentina, about 4 million people are exposed to high levels of As from drinking water (based on the 10 µg/L limit), the largest known As-exposed population in Latin America. Though due mostly to volcanic ash, As-containing pesticides also contribute to the problem (Castro de Esparza, 2009a). In Argentina, elevated levels of As have been detected in the Chaco-Pampean Plains and Cuyo regions of the Andes, located in the central and northwestern and parts of the country, respectively.

High levels of As in drinking water (>1000 µg/L) have been identified in central Argentina, with a high proportion of contaminated wells. For instance, the Córdoba province in the Chaco-Pampean Plain of central Argentina is one of the largest regions with high As (Perez-Carrera and Fernandez-Cirelli, 2005). In the Tucuman province, departments of Leales and Graneros, As concentration in well waters were found to be between 10 and 968 µg/L (Guber et al., 2009). A report published a few decades ago showed that over 82% of water samples exceeded WHO drinking water standard (l0 µg/L) in the Chaco-Pampean region (Nicolli et al., 1989). Another recent study from the south west part of the Pampean Plain identified more than half of the ground water samples as having As levels higher than 50 µg/L, ranging between 60 and 500 µg/L (Paoloni et al., 2005). In La Pampa province, in the central part of Argentina within the Chaco-Pampean Plain, As levels varied from 4 to 5300 µg/L (Smedley et al., 2002) and a recent study observed a range between 3 and 1326 µg/L (O'Reilly et al., 2010). The survey identified a disproportionately large number of water sources with high level of As in rural areas.

Some reports from the Puna area of the Argentinean Andes bordering Chile demonstrated a prevalence of As exposure in different sources of drinking water, and an increased concentration over time. Water As distribution data from the Puna area reports that 61% of the 46 well water contained As more than l0µg/L with a highest concentration of 2,000 µg/L (Farías et al., 2008). A recent survey in 6 different villages in the Puna region found elevated levels of As in tap water, with a range between 3.5 and 220 µg/L (Concha et al., 2010). The study also found that people were drinking spring water with high levels of As (322 µg/L). The river water in Puna area also contains high levels of As (1,000 µg/L). In addition, extremely high levels of As were detected in the Pompeya Hot Spring (10,000 µg/L) that releases As into the river (Concha et al., 2010). Interestingly, significant fluctuation was observed in As levels (from 140 to 220 µg/L) over a 10-year period in the same source in San Antonio de los Cobres of Puna area (Concha et al., 2006). Recent data in the San Juan province of the Cuyo region showed As concentration ranging between 9 and 357 µg/L (O'Reilly et al., 2010).

In Chile, high levels of As were detected in Region II in the northern part the country. People in Antofagasta in Region II were exposed to high As (90–860 µg/L) in their drinking water between 1955 and 1978, with the peak concentration in 1958 (Ferreccio and Sancha, 2006). However, the exposure gradually decreased from 110 µg/L to 40 µg/L from 1970 to 1979 when the first and the second water purifying pumps were intalled in Antofagasta and Calama respectively. Since 2003, As levels have further dropped to 10 µg/L in northern Chile. People from two other cities of northern Chile, Tocopilla and Calama also consumed high As in their driking water between 1958 and 1970 (250 and 150 µg/L, respectively). It is estimated that 400,000 people were exposed to arsenic from these cities during that time period (Ferreccio and Sancha, 2006), and it is currently estimated that 1.8 millon people live in arsenic endemic areas in Chile (Sancha and O'Ryan, 2008). Though the problem of As exposure has been addressed in Antofagasta, there are still towns, villages, and isolated households suffering from contaminated water supplies, affecting several thousand people in rural areas of northern Chile, who are drinking As-contaminated water or using it for animal husbandry.

Limited information is available on the As contamination from Uruguay, Bolivia and Peru. Because the Chaco-Pampean plain covering large part of Argentina extends into Uruguay in the aquifer sediments of this country also volcanic ash as primary As source is found. One recent survey has detected As in groundwater in the south of San José in Uruguay an average As concentration between 25 and 50 µg/L in 22 ground water samples and some had more than 50 µg/L (Bundschuh et al., 2008).

In Bolivia, both natural and industrial activities have contributed to high As in ground water. The central and southern parts of Bolivia’s Andean highland have high As in water and soil. In Poopó, basin surface water samples from local rivers and from the Poopó lake contained water As ranges between 90 to 140 µg/L, while ground water contained between 10 to 90 µg/L with a seasonal differences in As concentration in the lake water (Bundschuh et al., 2008). A survey from the Rio Pilcomayo region of Bolivia found high levels of As in drinking water (0.2–112 ug/L), irrigation water (0.6–329 ug/L) and very high in river water (0.9–12,805 ug/L), the last range corresponding to sites where mine drainage flows into surface water . Most of the drinking water in the region exceeded the WHO standard for As in drinking water (Archer et al., 2005).

Rocks of the Yucamane volcano area appear to be the main source of As in Peru. The Callazas and the Salado rivers pass though the Yucamane volcano and lift As in river water as high as 640 and 1680 µg/L, respectively (Castro de Esparza, 2009b). Recent studies show the presence of As in groundwater around Puno area and in the departments of Tacna and Moquegua (Castro de Esparza, 2009b).

An estimated 500,000 people in rural Ecuador have been exposed to As from water and food. High levels of As (>10 µg/L) have been been detected in the drinking water of Tumbaco, Guayllabamba, Cumbaya, Yaruqui, El Quinche, Pifo y Puembo, and Pichincha province. Geothermal waters from El Carchi, Imbabura, Pichincha, Cotopaxi, and Tungurahua Provinces show As levels from 113 to 844 µg/L (Bundschuh et al., 2008). El Angel river in the Carchi Province receives thermal waters and shows As in the range of 64 to 113 µg/L (Bundschuh et al., 2008). In the central part of the Andean region, natural As is present in Papallacta Lake. This lagoon is fed by the Tambo river and geothermal residual waters, and shows As concentrations that vary from 104 to 360 µg/L (Bundschuh et al., 2008).

Central America: Nicaragua, El Salvador and Costa Rica

In Nicaragua, high levels of As have been identified in ground water (up to 1320 µg/L) in El Zapote and Llano La Tejera (Bundschuh et al., 2008). Between 2002 and 2005, a number of surveys by UNICEF reported a range of As concentrations, from below detection limit to 1320 µg/L in well water of the Llano La Tejera community (Cuevas and Bundschuh, 2010). A survey in 2005 found 87% of the 54 wells had higher As more than 10 µg/L (Cuevas and Bundschuh, 2010). Another survey detected that 36% of 57 groundwater samples had As concentrations more than 10 µg/L, with a range between 10 and 122 µg/L. In addition to these two communities, As in ground water has been detected in several more areas of western Nicaragua (Bundschuh et al., 2010b).

Very little is known about As exposure in El Salvador and Costa Rica. Lake sediment from As-rich volcanic deposits and water in El Salvador both contain high levels of As. Ilopango, Coatepeque, and Olomega lake waters in El Salvador all have high As. Arsenic concentrations between 150 and 770 µg/L make this water unsuitable for human consumption (Bundschuh et al., 2008). It is estimated that at least 300,000 people in El Salvador mainly from Ilopango area, may be exposed to high As. Varying amounts of As have been detected in spring water of northwestern Costa Rica, that ranging from 5 µg/L to 11,000 µg/L (Bundschuh et al., 2010a) though drinking water resources seem not be affected.

Arsenic exposure in Brazil and Mexico

Gold and copper mining have contributed to high levels of As in Brazil for over hundreds of years (Matschullat et al., 2007; Matschullat et al., 2000). Very high levels of As have been detected in the soil (50–1000 mg/kg) from the Iron Quardrangle area of the southeastern part of Brazil, where gold and other mining activities have been operating over 250 years (Matschullat et al., 2007). Water from the mining districts Nova Lima and Santa Barbara contain As as high as 350 µg/L (Matschullat et al., 2007).

In Mexico, As is present in the Transmexican Volcanic Belt where As-rich soil-contaminated ground water and As-based pesticides are used. High levels of As in drinking water Mexico was first identified in 1958. Since then, >50 µg/L As had been detected in the other areas in Mexico, including Durango, Coahuila, Zacatecas, Morelos, Agues, Calientes, Chihuahua, Puebla, Nuevo Leon, Guanajuato, Jalisco, Oaxaca, and San Luis Potosi (Armienta and Segovia, 2008) representing 13 out of 31 Mexican states (Bundschuh et al. 2011, this issue). A study in the region of Lagunera found 64% of the wells to have As concentrations higher than 50 µg/L, with a range of 8–624 µg/L (Del Razo et al. 1993). Ground water in the Zimapan and Guanajuato areas contained As between 190 and 650 µg/L (average 380 µg/L) and 280 µg/L (Armienta and Segovia, 2008). As concentrations ranging from 15 to 102 µg/L were seen in a 2002–2003 survey in the Los Altos de Jalisco (LAJ) region of west-central Mexico that included 129 public water systems from 17 municipal capitals. The highest As concentration found in well water samples was 263 µg/L, and high levels of As were detected in Teocaltiche (157 µg/L) and San Juan de los Lagos (113 µg/L) cities of Mexico. Moreover, the mean concentrations in all 17 cities were higher than the World Health Organization guideline value of l0 µg/L of As (Hurtado-Jimenez and Gardea-Torresdey, 2006).

4. Biological markers of arsenic exposure, metabolism, toxicity, and susceptibility

4.1. Biomarkers of Arsenic Exposure

Several biomarkers have been used to assess As exposure in Latin America, namely blood, hair, nail, and urinary As levels. Though As from short-term exposure can be cleared from the bloodstream relatively quickly, blood arsenic (AsB) levels have been proposed as a marker of chronic exposure. AsB levels were used in Latin America in a 1995 study that involved 30 native young women exposed to a variable level of exposure (As in drinking water 2.5–200 µg/L) (Vahter et al., 1995). A wide range of AsB was observed (1.0 to 18.3 µg/L), but the only significant increases of this marker were in those samples that came from the region of the highest exposure As in drinking water (>200 µg/L), with a median AsB of 7.6 µg/L. Samples from regions of lower concentration (As in drinking water from 2.5 to 43.4 µg/L) did not show a proportional increase in AsB level (1.5 µg/L), suggesting that at low levels of exposure this indicator may lack enough sensitivity for exposure assessment (Vahter et al., 1995). High levels of As in hair (range 37–2110 µg/kg, mean ranged from 119 to 617 µg/kg) and in urine (range 11–891 µg/L, and mean ranged from 23 to 64 µg/L) were observed among about 33 study participants in two time points from the four different As-exposed to communities. However, the study failed to observe an association between hair and urinary As (Archer et al., 2005).

Because of the sulfhydryl groups in the keratin that comprises hair and nails, As is therefore drawn to these parts of the body more exclusively. As these tissues grow slowly, they can be used as indicators of long-term exposure. In Argentina, hair samples from an area of high As exposure averaged 4.2 µg As/g (range: 0.4 to 20.0 µg/g) compared to the non-exposed population, whose hair As levels ranged from 0.09 to 0.28 µg/g (Astolfi et al., 1982). All the study participants from the exposed area had hair As levels over 1 µg/g (toxicological value considered). Repeating the experiment six years after installation of a treatment plant, the percentage of people with arsenic in hair over 1 µg/g fell to 40% (Borgoño et al., 1977). Such responsiveness to changes in drinking water As suggests that hair could be used as a dependable indicator of exposure.

A pair of studies from Chile illustrated the use of As in fingernails as a marker of exposure (Martinez et al., 2004; Martinez et al., 2005). The population for these studies included 106 individuals from Antofagasta (As in water 3.34 to 1087 µg/L) and 111 from an unexposed area in the southern region (As in water 0.2 µg/L). Though the average level of As in fingernails for the exposed region was proportional to the increase of As in drinking water (2.58 to 18.33 µg/g), those exposed to lower levels of As in drinking water, and the control population, also showed a high level of exposure through this biomarker (3.57µg/g), compared with values from other non endemics arsenicism regions (IPCS, 2001). This was likely due to exposure from other sources of water or contact with As-contaminated soil or dust (Díaz-Barriga et al., 1993).

Urinary As has been used as a maker for As exposure in epidemiological studies throughout Latin America (Astolfi et al., 1982; Biggs et al., 1997; Calderon et al., 2001; Díaz-Barriga et al., 1993; Gonsebatt et al., 1997; Hernández-Zavala et al., 1998; Moore et al., 1997; Navoni et al., 2006; Navoni et al., 2009; Navoni et al., 2010; Pineda-Zavaleta et al., 2004; Yanez et al., 2003). With chronic exposure, urinary As reaches a steady-state level and correlates well with drinking water As concentration. Coupled with the relative ease of non-invasive collection, this makes urinary As a convenient measure of exposure in many settings. The highest urinary As level in Latin America has been recorded in Argentina, at roughly 4000 µg/g creatinine (Navoni et al., 2006). Other reports indicate high urinary As in Chile (2145 µg/L) and Mexico (2058 µg/L) (Biggs et al., 1997; Hernández-Zavala et al., 1998). The degree of exposure is comparable to levels found in other parts of the world (Basu et al., 2005; Samanta et al., 1999) and far exceeds the safe levels (ACGIH, 2009; WHO, 1989). While urinary arsenic does correlate well with the main source of exposure (drinking water), it may be considered as a better metric than water As concentration to assess total exposure in populations where water is not the only path of exposure. This is illustrated by a study of 135 children (aged 3–6 years) from a Mexican mining region, who had also been significantly exposed to As in soil and dust. While urinary As was elevated (69–594 µg/g creatinine), this exposure would have been underestimated if risk had been assessed using the concentration of As in drinking water alone (1.7 to 17.5 µg/L) (Díaz-Barriga et al., 1993).

4.2. Individual Variability in Urinary Arsenic Metabolites Profile

Essential to any discussion of As human toxicity is an understanding of the way in which it is methylated or metabolized, through a series of reduction and oxidative methylation reactions. After entering the bloodstream, inorganic As (InAs) is reduced from arsenate (Asv) to arsenite (AsIII) before being transported to the liver. Once within hepatocytes, arsenite (+III) methyltransferase (AS3MT) facilitates conversion to methylarsonic acid (MMAV). Subsequent reduction produces methylarsonous acid (MMAIII), which undergoes oxidative methylation to form the dimethylarsinic acid (DMAV) that is further reduced to dimethylarsinous acid (DMAIII) (Loffredo et al., 2003). Because methyl groups needed for these reactions are donated by the S-adenosyl methionine (SAM), which is produced via one-carbon metabolism, activity of this key biochemical pathway is inexorably tied to the balance of As metabolites in the body at any given time (Engstrom et al., 2009).

Much of the susceptibility to As-related health effects is determined by the large interindividual variation observed in As methylation (Loffredo et al., 2003). Of the metabolites, trivalent forms (particularly MMAIII) are most associated with adverse health outcomes. With DMA showing the lowest retention and constituting the largest portion of metabolites in urine (60–80%), the excreted proportion of MMA and the ratio of MMA to DMA are likely an accurate reflection of harmful metabolites being retained in body tissue (Del Razo et al., 1997; Vahter et al., 2000). The distributions of urinary As metabolites are determined in large part by genetic variations and is illustrated by the aggregation of methylation patterns within families, as well as the fact that only 30% of metabolic differences (as measured by MMA:DMA) can be explained by factors such as exposure level, smoking status, and gender (Chung et al., 2002; Hopenhayn-Rich et al., 1996b; Hopenhayn-Rich et al., 1996c).

A number of studies from Latin America found that people with skin lesions and high As exposure are likely to have reduced As methylation capacity with high trivalent species MMA in urine (Del Razo et al., 1997; Valenzuela et al., 2005; Valenzuela et al., 2007). Important factors that influence urinary As metabolites include age, smoking, ethnicity, levels of As exposure, and genetic polymorphisms and others (Concha et al., 1998b; Hopenhayn-Rich et al., 1996b; Valenzuela et al., 2007)

4.3. Arsenic-induced genotoxicity, oxidative stress and DNA damage

Arsenic is believed to have a broad array of detrimental effects that contribute to the development of acute and chronic disease states, including genotoxicity, oxidative stress, and altered DNA repair capacity Several studies in Latin America have shown that chromosomal aberrations were more frequent in a Mexican population with high exposure (0.39 mg/L of As in drinking water) compared to those with low exposure (0.019–0.026 mg/L) (Ostrosky-Wegman et al., 1991). Similarly, a significant elevation (P < 0.001) in sister chromatid exchange was found in individuals in Argentina whose drinking water contained 0.13 mg/L of As (Lerda, 1994). Genotoxic effects were also observed through evaluation of micronucleus induction in cases of both environmental and occupational exposure in studies from Chile (Martinez et al., 2004; Paiva et al., 2008). Potentially as a result of As-induced DNA damage, levels of tumor suppressor protein p53 were elevated in high-exposure individuals (Salazar et al., 2004). Enhancing any genotoxicity of As would be the impairment of DNA repair capabilities that was observed by Andrew et al. in Mexico (Andrew et al., 2006).

Indicators of As-related DNA damage have been studied specifically with respect to the bladder, with initial work characterizing micronuclei in exfoliated cells. Created when parts of the nucleus do not properly migrate during telophase, micronuclei can be used as markers of chromosomal damage. In a population of 125 Chilean males exposed to high and low water As (600 and 15 µg/L), a dose-dependent relationship was found between urinary As levels and micronuclei as As levels increased from 4 to 728.9 µg/L (p < 0.001) (Moore et al., 1997). A significant reduction on bladder micronuclei (p < 0.05) was observed after 8 weeks of follow-up in an intervention study among a sub-sample of participants in the high exposed group with provision of a drinking water source of lower As content (from 600 µg/L to 45 µg/L). The most significant decline was observed among individuals with previously had urinary As (<700 µg/L) and smokers (p = 0.002) (Moore et al., 1997). A 2002 study followed these results and described how As exposure affects the genomic stability of bladder tumors, finding a correlation between chromosomal alterations per tumor and As exposure (p<0.05). Exposure was, in particular, associated with deletions in chromosome 17p (Moore et al., 2002). A potential early indicator of these bladder tumors was described in a Mexican study of transforming growth factor alpha (TGF-α) concentration in bladder urothelial cells (BUC). TGF-α is a protein that is upregulated in some cancers; hence, high expression in BUC can be used as a marker for early stages of tumor development. It was shown that those in high-exposure areas (mean = 120 µg As/L) had significantly higher TGF-α when compared to individuals with lower exposure (p<0.05) (Valenzuela et al., 2007), indicating that TGF-α in BUC could be used as an early indicator of susceptibility to bladder cancer in As-exposed populations.

4.4. Genetic susceptibility to arsenic-related adverse health outcomes

Because As-related health effects are greatly influenced by As metabolism, it is useful to identify genetic variations that dictate the efficiency of this process. Individuals in a genetically favorable position that can better methylate As completely are those with a higher excreted DMA/MMA ratio – achieved either through a high %DMA, a low %MMA, or both. To date, variations in the gene for As (+III) methyltransferase (AS3MT) have been shown to be the most influential in the balance of urinary metabolites. Engström et al. (2007) identified three variant alleles (G12390C, C14215T, A359916) associated with a low %MMA and a high %DMA (p < 0.001), leading to a higher ratio for the second methylation step that converts MMA to DMA (Engstrom et al., 2007). Another study also observed that increased DMA/MMA ratio with AS3MT variants was most attributable to low %MMA (Meza et al., 2007). Two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs3740400, rs7085104) were found to be in strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) with the three aforementioned SNPs. They were similarly associated with a SNP (rs743572) located near the gene CYP17A1, 27 kbs upstream of AS3MT (Engstrom et al., 2009). Taken together, these results indicate the presence of a large haplotype block (pairwise LD analysis r2 = 0.82) (at least 63 kbs in size, on chromosome 10) that can have a profound effect on health outcomes by altering the methylation of As (Gomez-Rubio et al., 2010). Sampayo-Reyes et al. emphasized the impact of variations in this block as carriers of the 287Thr allele were observed to have increased genetic damage, presumably as a result of the increase in MMA (Sampayo-Reyes et al., 2010).

In the biotransformation of electrophilic and hydrophilic xenobiotics, glutathione S-transerase (GST) phase II enzymes play a crucial role by catalyzing their conjugation with reduced glutathione (Seidegard and Ekstrom, 1997). In Latin America, four different members of this family have been analyzed for effects of SNPs on As metabolism (GSTM1, GSTO1, GSTP1, GSTT1). Three years after it was shown that SNPs in GSTO1 could account for some of the interindividual metabolic variation (Marnell et al., 2003), the GSTM1 null polymorphism was found to be associated with a high %MMA (P = 0.083) while the GSTP1 val/val polymorphism was related to a low %DMA (P = 0.085) (Marcos et al., 2006). Subsequent studies confirmed these results and additionally noted the effect of GSTT1 polymorphisms on %MMA and %DMA (Engstrom et al., 2007; Steinmaus et al., 2007). Metabolic effects were also observed in certain GSTO1 SNPs (Alal40Asp, Glul55del, Glu208Lys, Ala236Val) (Paiva et al., 2008; Sampayo-Reyes et al., 2010).

Noting the significant interplay between As biotransformation and one-carbon metabolism, SNPs involved in this pathway have recently been explored. This includes those in genes for 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), 5-methyltetrahydrofolate-homocysteine methyltransferase (MTR), choline dehydrogenase (CHDH), and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate-homocysteine methyltransferase reductase (MTRR). Because the MTHFR 222Val allele had previously been associated with lower enzymatic activity and higher plasma homocysteine levels, it was not surprising to find variant MTHFR alleles associated with lower DMA/MMA ratios (Engstrom et al., 2007; Steinmaus et al., 2007). Similar results were observed with respect to MTR and, to a lesser degree, both CHDH and MTRR (Engstrom et al., 2007; Engstrom et al., 2009).

With reductive processes also crucial to As metabolism, the genes for glutaredoxin-1 (GLRX) and peroxiredoxin-2 (PRDX2) were both studied, finding a small impact on metabolite balance (Engstrom et al., 2009). A follow-up study evaluated oxidative DNA damage, as indicated by cellular levels of 8-Oxo-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-oxo-dG). This was shown to correlate positively with %MMA, with an influence seen when measured with respect to variations in APEX nuclease 1 (APEX1, a DNA repair enzyme), DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1 and 3B (DNMT1 and DNMT3B, DNA methyltransferases), Thioredoxin reductase 1 and 2 (TXNRD1 and TXNRD2, thioredoxin reducers) and Glutaredoxin-1 (GLRX, involved in GSH redox reactions) (Engstrom et al., 2010).

The influence of some biomarkers on As metabolism have been shown to specifically affect risk of lung cancer, and could prove valuable in assessing individual or population-specific susceptibility to this disease. Those specifically connected to lung cancer are the null genotype of glutathione S-transferase (GST) and the 2A genotype of the Mspl polymorphism in cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) The combined genotype of 2A and null GSTM1 was related an OR of 2.51 for lung cancer that increases to 2.98 with habitual smoking; in males, the 2A genotype confers an OR of 2.6 (Adonis et al., 2005a; Adonis et al., 2005b). Risks involving GSTM1 polymorphisms lie in its function in As methylation; the null genotype may hinder this process and cause an overall increase in As retention. Such retention is usually in the form of increased %MMA, which was recently linked to higher lung cancer when caused by variant cystathionine (3-synthase alleles (rs234709 and rs4920037) (Steinmaus et al., 2010). Similar future studies would be useful in understanding a gene-environment in relation to As-related health outcomes.

5. Health effects from arsenic exposure in Latin America

Most studies examining the adverse health effects of drinking water As in Latin America were set in Argentina and Chile, with some limited data also coming from Mexico. As early as the 1970s, studies from Chile’s Region II showed As deposits in lung tissue of children with As-induced skin lesions, along with a concurrent increase in the rate of lung disease (Borgoño et al., 1977; Rosenberg, 1974; Zaldivar, 1980; Zaldivar and Ghai, 1980). Since that time, research has continued to describe how As influences the respiratory system, while also beginning to explore its effect on the bladder. Most research on bladder cancer has been conducted in Argentina, while the majority of lung cancer studies have taken place in Chile. Within these mortality studies, consistent association has been observed between As exposure and both lung cancer and bladder cancers - especially among smokers (Hopenhayn-Rich et al., 1996a; Smith et al., 2006). In addition, a few studies have shown disease susceptibility variation due to different levels of As methylation capacity and certain genotype, in particular, higher MMA was associated with an increased risk of bladder and lung cancer (Steinmaus et al., 2006; Steinmaus et al., 2007; Steinmaus et al., 2010). These cancers have shown a long latency period, with clinical presentation coming decades after exposure, even if exposure was limited to early in life (Smith et al., 2006). Recent studies on other non-malignant chronic diseases have been more limited, with inconsistent data having been obtained on such adverse health outcomes as cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, lung disease, and skin lesions (Smith et al., 2006; Yuan et al., 2007).

Arsenic has been shown to adversely impact reproductive and child health, as it has been shown to cross the placenta and cause anemia, low birth weight, and fetal mortality (Hopenhayn-Rich et al., 2000; Hopenhayn et al., 2003b). In utero and early childhood exposure in Mexico has been linked with impaired cognitive development, manifested through lower test scores and slow linguistic abstraction (Calderon et al., 2001; Rocha-Amador et al., 2007). In addition, an ecological study compared liver cancer mortality between 1950 and 2000 in an As endemic area in Chile with an unexposed region. For those exposed as young children, liver cancer mortality between ages 0 and 19 was significantly elevated (RR=10.6; 95% CI: 2.9–39.2) in comparison to those living in the unexposed region (Liaw et al., 2008).

The majority of these studies were based on cross-sectional, case-control, or retrospective designs that relied on past exposure assessment with relatively small sample size and limited data on individual exposure. In many cases, particularly among mortality studies, outcomes were assessed by using death records which may involve misclassification errors. These studies have consistently suggested a link between As exposure and human cancer. Since most of the methodological limitations involve misclassifications of disease or exposure that are non-differential, the true association may be stronger than what has been observed. Though long latency periods of 10 to 35 years have been associated with many As-induced disease states, it is important to note the early life effects in children could include cognitive impairment, low birth weight, and DNA damage. Such effects are indicative of the serious implications of exposure that may manifest in adulthood.

5.1. Bladder cancer

Evidence of bladder cancer mortality from As exposure in Latin American countries mainly comes from a few ecological studies in As endemic areas in Argentina and Chile. An earlier study captured bladder cancer mortality in approximately 2,750,000 inhabitants living in 26 counties of Córdoba province in Argentina between 1986 and 1991. The study found strong association between As exposure and deaths from bladder cancer mortality. Standard mortality ratios (SMRs) were: 0.80 (95% CI: 0.66–0.96), 1.42 (95% CI = 1.14–1.74), and 2.14 (95% CI: 1.78–2.53) for men and 1.21 (95% CI: 0.85–1.64), 1.58 (95% CI :1.01–2.35), and 1.82 (95% CI: 1.19–2.64) for women in relation to low (<=40µg/L), medium (>40–178 µg/L) and high (>178 µg/L) water As (p-for trend, male=0.001 and female=0.04)(Hopenhayn-Rich et al., 1996a). Stronger association was observed in a population of roughly 400,000 living in Chile’s Region II, who had been exposed to drinking water averaging 570 µg As/L for over a decade before a treatment plant was installed in 1971 (men: SMR = 6.0 (95% CI: 4.8–7.4); women: SMR = 8.2 (95% CI: 6.3–10.5)) (Smith et al., 1998). Steinmaus et al. (2006) demonstrated that higher MMA in urine was associated with higher risk for bladder cancer (OR=1.33; 95% CI: 0.74–2.39) in population living in the same area (Steinmaus et al., 2006). Another study estimated the rate ratios (RRs) for women to be more than double (RR=13.8; (95% CI: 7.74–24.5) compared to that of men (RR=6.1; 95% CI: 3.97–9.39) for bladder cancer using death records of over half a million from two regions in Chile between 1958 and 2000 (Marshall et al., 2007). Perhaps more importantly, the finding demonstrated that mortality started to increase after 10 years of high exposure the in Chile’s Region II in 1958 and continue to rise even after 25 years of reducing the exposure to a low level (Marshall et al., 2007). In a case-control study from Cordoba region, Bates et al. (2004), found elevated risk of bladder cancer only among smokers who were exposed to moderately-to-low levels of As for more than 50 years (OR=2.5; 95% CI: 1.1–5.5) (Bates et al., 2004).

5.2. Lung cancer

Research on As-related lung cancer in Latin America has been based largely in the As-endemic Region II of Chile. As the world’s most important region for copper smelting, the populations of northern Chile (Region II) have a long history of As exposure related to mining activities. Exposed to drinking water As levels that reached an average concentration near 600 µg/L from 1958–1971 before decreasing to under 100 µg/L by 1980, residents were shown to have significantly elevated lung cancer mortality in both men (SMR = 3.8; 95% CI: 3.5–4.1) and women (SMR=3.1; 95% CI2.7–3.7) (Smith et al., 1998). In Argentina, Hopenhayn-Rich et al. (1996), reported a dose-response relationship between As exposure and lung cancer: the SMRs (95% CI) for low, medium, and high exposure groups (<=40, 40–178, and >178 µg/L) in men and women, respectively, were 0.92 (0.85–0.98), 1.54 (1.44–1.64), 1.77 (1.63–1.90) and 1.24 (1.06–1.42), 1.34 (1.12–1.58), 2.16 (1.83–2.52) (Hopenhayn-Rich et al., 1996a).

A subsequent case-control study from As endemic area in Chile also found a very strong trend in lung cancer. The OR for lung cancer risk was 1.0, 1.6 (95% CI = 0.5–5.3), 3.9 (95% CI = 1.2–12.3), 5.2 (95% CI: 2.3–11.7), and 8.9 (95% CI = 4.0–19.6), for As concentrations ranging from less than 10 µg/L to a 65-year average concentration of 200–400 µg/L. This association was particularly strong among smokers (OR=32.0; 95% CI: 7.2–198.0) (Ferreccio et al., 2000). Though the large spike in drinking water As concentration occurred in 1958, the overall risk of lung cancer did not peak until the period of 1992–1994 for men (RR=3.61; 95% CI: 3.13–4.16) and in 1989–1991 for women (RR=3.26; 95% CI: 2.50–4.23) suggesting a long latency period for lung cancer over 35 years after the onset of high exposure in Region II (Marshall et al., 2007). Studies from Chile not only showed a long latency period for lung cancer incidence, a recent study also demonstrated that As exposure during a discrete period of exposure in utero or during early childhood may have a profound impact on lung cancer later in life (Smith et al., 2006). In one study, lung cancer mortality rate was more than six-fold higher among those who were born during the high-exposure period (SMR=6.1; 95% CI: 3.5–9.9) and seven-fold among those who were exposed in utero (SMR=7.0; 95% CI: 5.4–8.9) (Smith et al., 2006). Individual risk to these substantial effects may be largely attributable to metabolic variations, as a recent a case-control study from As-exposed areas in Cordoba, Argentina, showed that lung cancer patients (N=120) had significantly high levels of urinary MMA (OR=3.09; 95% CI: 1.08–8.81) (Steinmaus et al., 2010).

5.3. Kidney, liver, and skin cancers

Among Latin American populations, relatively little has been published on other As-related cancers. However, in a report from Cordoba, kidney cancer mortality was found to be elevated in both men and women (SMR=1.57 and 1.81, respectively) who were exposed to high concentrations of water As (>178 µg/L). This study suggested that the risk of kidney cancer peaked roughly 10 in years and remained elevated for at least 25 years following high-level exposure (Hopenhayn-Rich et al., 1998). A more recent study from Chile demonstrated a peak kidney cancer mortality in 10 years with a long latency period. Interestingly, this study did find significant gender differences, as RR reached a maximum for men at 3.4 (95% CI: 2.2–5.1) in the time period of 1981–1985, but peaked in women (4.4; 95% CI: 3.0 – 6.4) during the span of 1991–1995. Early-life exposure resulted in an increased risk (RR=7.1, 95% CI: 3.1–14) for those born just before or during the high exposure period (Yuan et al., 2010). Hopenhayn et al. (1998) observed a slight increase of liver cancer in As exposed (>178 µg/L) population from Cordoba (SMR 1.80 for men, 1.92 for women).

However, risk of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) from As exposure was evaluated in a small (N=90) case-control study in the Region Lagunera, Mexico. The effect was observed only among exposed to As and history human papilloma virus (HPV) infection. The study reported a significant increased risk of NMSC was among those exposed to high As and HPV seropositivite (OR=16.5, p< 0.001) (Rosales-Castillo et al., 2004).

5.4. Other chronic health effects

Only a handful of studies have been published on other chronic non-malignant health effects in Latin America, including skin lesion, cardiovascular disease and respiratory illness (Astolfi et al., 1982; Hopenhayn-Rich et al., 1996; Hopenhayn-Rich et al., 1998). The majority of these studies, however, have a number of limitations including small sample size, selection of controls and a lack of reliable exposure data. This has led to inconsistent findings.

A recent study (N=125) from El Zapote in Nicaraguan, identified significantly high risk of skin lesions (OR=4.66, 96% CI: 1.48–14.69) those exposed to As >250 µg/L (Gómez, 2008).

In a small (N=28) ecological study from an endemic area in Chile, Smith et al., (2006) showed a high mortality and incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and bronchiectasis among adults between 1989 and 2000. Strong associations were observed for chronic bronchitis in those who were exposed in their early childhood (SMR:46.2; 95% CI: 21.1–87.7) and in utero (SMR: 12.4; 95% CI: 3.3.–31.7) (Smith et al., 2006). However, an earlier study by the same group found no elevation in SMR from COPD (SMR = 1.0, 95% CI: 0.8–1.1) (Smith et al., 1998).

High mortality from acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (RR = 3.23; 95% CI = 2.79–3.75; p < 0.001) was observed among young adult men aged 30–49 who were exposed to As in early childhood or in utero during the peak As exposure period in Chile. AMI mortality was found to be the main cause of As-related deaths during and immediately following the high-exposure period (Yuan et al., 2007).

A case-control (N=400) study in Mexico observed effect of As exposure on the type 2 diabetes mellitus in a population exposed to a wide range of As (20 to 400 µg/L). The study observed almost three fold increase in diabetes risk (OR = 2.84; 95% CI = 1.64–4.92) associated with urinary As more than 104 µg/gm creatinine (Coronado-Gonzalez et al., 2007).

5.6. Effects of in utero and early childhood exposure

A few earlier studies from the As endemic area in Chile, showed that high levels of As deposited in the children’s lungs (Rosenberg, 1974), leading to abnormal lung tissues (Zaldivar and Ghai, 1980) and lung disease (Rosenberg, 1974; Zaldivar, 1980). Subsequently, papers showed a reduction of respiratory symptoms followed by introduction of As free water the Antafagasta, Chile. For example, autopsies of the five children with arsenical skin lesions who died between 1968 and 1969 from an As endemic areas in Antofagasta reported high levels of As in their lung tissues (Rosenberg, 1974). Abnormal lung tissues were detected in four of these five children and two had interstitial fibrosis (Zaldivar and Ghai, 1980). Relying on survey data between 1968 and 1972 from Antofagasta, a study found a high prevalence of chronic cough among 398 children who were exposed to As from drinking water. The report, though, demonstrated a decline of chronic cough from 38% to 7% (p <0.001) following installation of Antofagasta As removal plant in the area, reinforcing the effects of As among young children (Borgoño et al., 1977). Another study showed a 23-fold greater prevalence of bronchiectasis among children living in As endemic area of Antofagasta compared to rest of Chile (Rosenberg, 1974). In 1976, a cross-sectional survey among 144 school children with arsenical skin lesions in Antofagasta showed that children with As skin lesions are 2.5 times more likely to have a pulmonary disease than those with normal skin (Zaldivar, 1980).

Several studies focused on the effects of As and its metabolites on reproductive outcomes in Argentina. An important study among Andean pregnant women in northwest Argentina, showed that As easily crosses into placenta which raised concerns of fetal exposure (Concha et al., 1998b). Interestingly, subsequent studies revealed that methylation of As in the mother seems to increase during pregnancy, passing the more easily excretible DMA on to the fetus (Concha et al., 1998a; Hopenhayn et al., 2003b). Additionally, even at high exposure (>200 µg/L), As concentration was found to be low in breast milk (Concha et al., 1998c). These findings suggest that protective measures occur during pregnancy and postpartum may keep the more sensitive fetus or child from being overwhelmed by As toxicity that could lead to adverse health outcomes.

Such natural safeguards, however, were not adequate to eliminate the possibility of As -induced effects on health during pregnancy and childhood. In Antofagasta, Chile, an area with history of high drinking water As concentration (~860 µg/L, between 1958–1970) was found to elevate late fetal mortality (RR = 1.7; 95% CI: 1.5–1.9), neonatal mortality (RR = 1.53; 95% CI: 1.4–1.7), and postneonatal mortality (RR=1.26; 95% CI: 1.2–1.3) (Hopenhayn-Rich et al., 2000). Even at moderate to low As water concentration (<50 µg/L), a reduction of birth weight was observed (−57g; 95% CI = −123 to 9) (Hopenhayn et al., 2003a). While the mechanism of such changes is not fully understood, anemia in the mother has also been identified as a consequence of As exposure could be a likely explanation. Hopenhayn et al. observed that, in the third trimester of pregnancy, there was a significantly high anemia among (49% vs. 17%, p < 0.0001) mothers exposed to As 40 compared to < 1 µg/L (Hopenhayn et al., 2006).

Particularly alarming has been the observations that As exposure impairs cognitive development in school children was shown to be impacted by As exposure. Studies from two cities in Mexico where water As was more than 150 µg/L showed an inverse association between intelligence quotient scores and As exposure (β = −5.72, P = 0.003) (Rocha-Amador et al., 2007). Specific detrimental effects were observed in long-term memory and linguistic abstraction (Calderon et al., 2001). A subsequent evaluation using 11 cognitive tests showed that those with high exposure performed significantly poorer in 7 tests (p < 0.05). Interestingly, performance on memory evaluations was negatively correlation with urinary As only among girls, while tests of several different cognitive functions were effected in boys (i.e., Visual-Spatial Abilities with Figure Design, Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, Visual Search, Letter Sequencing Test) (Rosado et al., 2007).

Recent findings from Chile link in utero and early life As exposure to cardiovascular, respiratory and lung cancer later in adult life, and were discussed previously in this paper (Smith et al., 2006; Yuan et al., 2007). Some research has begun to discern the specific mechanisms of action for As in children, as well as the extent to which any of these genetic effects are reversible. Research in Mexico found that children with high urinary As displayed severe DNA damage, as evaluated by the Comet assay (P < 0.05) (Yanez et al., 2003). Furthermore, a recent study also showed that As exposed children also had an impaired DNA repair response (Mendez-Gomez et al., 2008). A recent study from Mexico indicated an effect of As exposure on immune function among 90 children in relation to urinary As (Vega L et al., 2008). While it is possible that such genetic alterations and immunodeficiency are transient, permanent alterations of this nature could be responsible for adverse health effects later in life.

6. Discussion

A large number of individuals from Latin American countries have been drinking As contaminated water for hundreds of years, yet there is still not comprehensive data on the extent of exposure and its health consequences. Latin America has, though, been the focus of importantstudies that have contributed significantly to current knowledge of As effects on human health - specifically with respect to the development of bladder, lung, and skin cancer. While development of and deaths from cancer may take as long 35 years after exposure, deaths from cardiovascular or respiratory diseases in children seem to occur during or soon after a period of high exposure – making shorter-term consequences of exposure a vital area of research (Rosenberg, 1974; Yuan et al., 2007; Zaldivar, 1980). Limited work has been done in these fields in Latin America, with studies of respiratory, cardiovascular, and neurological diseases yielding inconsistent findings. One exception is in the influence of As on pregnancy and childhood health, where substantial research has been conducted on near-term health outcomes. In children, profound effects have been observed, with long-term memory and linguistic abstraction affected by As (Calderon et al., 2001). In utero and early childhood exposure has also been linked to consequences such as lung cancer, bronchiectasis, liver cancer, and acute myocardial infraction later in life (Liaw et al., 2008; Steinmaus et al., 2006; Yuan et al., 2007). Though there are innate preventive measures to minimize adverse effects in children (the mother increases methylation during pregnancy and excretes relatively small amounts of As in breast milk), they cannot compensate for high levels or a prolonged period of exposure (Concha et al., 1998c; Hopenhayn et al., 2003b). As a result, studies have observed elevated fetal mortality, neonatal mortality, post neonatal mortality, reduced birth weight, and anemia in the mother (Hopenhayn-Rich et al., 2000; Hopenhayn et al., 2006; Hopenhayn et al., 2003a).

Although many of these As-related studies in Latin America were cross-sectional studies, reverse causation is not likely. The ecologic measure of As exposure, although may not accurately reflect exposure level at the individual level, was useful for assessing disease risk in populations that were exposed to high levels of As for the same period of time. Future studies, however, should consider measuring As exposure level at the individual level to better assess health effects at low-to-moderate levels of exposure in populations with varying levels of As exposure. Since retrospective studies do not allow collection of comprehensive data on host factors, susceptibility factors that may modify health effects of arsenic exposure were often not investigated. Cigarette smoking exemplifies the concept of an influential covariate that should be considered in epidemiological studies such as these. In one bladder cancer study, for example, effects of As were apparent only among smokers (Bates et al., 2004). Smoking was also found to influence risk of bladder cancer due to As, with individuals excreting high %MMA shown to have a quadrupled OR if they were also smokers (Steinmaus et al., 2006). With respect to lung cancer, synergistic effects was observed to among smokers exposed to water As more than 200 µg/L compared to nonsmokers exposed to less than 50 µg/L (Ferreccio et al., 2000). In studies that assessed genetic influences on lung cancer risk, it was found that the 2A genotype of the CYP1A1 was associated with an increased risk among habitual male smokers. Some GST biomarkers that have been shown to influence the distribution of As metabolites have also been implicated to play a role in elevated bladder cancer risks in smokers (Moore et al., 2004). Since individuals with diseases may change lifestyles, it is important to confirm the findings in prospective studies that measure smoking status before disease occurrence. Additional research that aims to identify modifiable susceptibility factors is also needed.

It should be noted that the literature reviewed in this paper may not represent the entire body of work regarding the health effects of As exposure in Latin America, as there are likely relevant studies that lie outside the scope of this article. Absent from this review are studies not published in English, those whose text were not available online, and those not indexed in searchable databases of medical literature. With the already high number of sources returned by the database searches (964 unique items), though, it was necessary to restrict the literature review to processes that could be conducted in a systematic manner. Even with the number or articles returned through this process, the authors acknowledge that some measure of quality control (such as correspondence with original study authors) was sacrificed in an effort to conduct the most broad and comprehensive review possible.

Though this review was limited to Latin America, As contamination is most certainly a health issue whose effects are felt far beyond the borders of these countries (Nordstrom, 2002). As even in westernized society there remains debate over acceptable levels of As in drinking water, research in Latin America can address local public health issues while also contributing to the current dialogue attempting to safeguard many populations against adverse health outcomes. Based on the studies included in this review, we would like to put forth several suggestions for future research.

First, with respect to childhood exposure, for example, it would be useful to investigate whether observed cognitive effects are reversible to any degree. The entire field of early childhood exposure should receive increased attention, given that children have been identified as more susceptible to arsenic exposure and that profound short-term and chronic health consequences have been found in those with early exposure. Second, conducting follow-up studies would allow a better understanding of the scope and temporality of disease onset. Third, work in other Latin American countries can be replicated to determine any differences in health outcomes that may be unique to Latin America’s genetic composition, environmental factors, or multiple routes of As exposure. Related to this suggestion is the need to further explore the influence of nutrition and whether it confers any protective advantage to Latin American populations over some exposed populations in Asia that suffer from malnutrition. This topic was explored in a very limited population (11 families), and warrants a study with more statistical power (Smith et al., 2000). Finally, the wealth of retrospective data provides a unique opportunity to investigate the effects of lower level As exposure on many health outcomes. Such information would be extremely valuable in assessing As exposure and consequences not only in Latin America, but also contribute to a global dialogue on determining safe levels of As in drinking water.

In summary, there is little doubt that the studies performed in Latin America have yielded substantial information on effects of As on the risk of bladder cancer, lung cancer, skin lesions, and other chronic diseases. Such short-term effects such as low birth weight and impaired cognitive development have also been observed. As-induced DNA damage in children may explain the underlying mechanisms of cancer risk at later life and future health risk. The full burden of As exposure in Latin America remains to be seen. With studies indicating that As can account for 7 – 20% of all deaths among exposed populations (Argos et al., 2010; Smith et al., 1998), there is a clear need for research and public health interventions in Latin America.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Locations of arsenic contamination from different water sources in Latin American countries

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Estimated population chronically exposed to arsenic (>50 µg/L) from drinking water in Latin American countries

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Study selection process

Table 1.

Studies from Latin America related to Arsenic-induced genotoxicity, oxidative stress and DNA damage

Reference County Design Characteristics of subjects Main Findings
Ostrosky-Wegman, et al. (1991) Mexico Cross-sectional 11 and 13 individuals drinking water with
high and low As (0.39 mg/L and 0.019–
0.026 mg/L)
The percentages of chromosomal aberrations and frequencies
of sister-chromatid exchanges were similar in both
populations, but complex aberrations were more frequent in
the highly As exposed group.
Lerda (1994) Argentina Cross-sectional 282 and 155 individuals drinking water with
high and low As (0.13 mg/L and 0.02 mg/L)
There was a significant elevation in sister-chromatid exchange
in high As exposed individuals.
Martinez et al. (2004) Chile Cross-sectional 106 and 111 individuals drinking water with
and low As (0.750 mg/L and 0.002 mg/L)
In the As exposed group, the overall frequency of binucleated
micronucleated cells is higher than in the reference group.
Paiva et al. (2008) Chile Cross-sectional 105 smelter workers, 52 administrators, and
50 workers from another copper mine with
no significant As exposure
No significant differences in micronuclei frequencies in
lymphocytes were detected between the groups.
Salazar et al. (2004) Mexico Cross-sectional 19 individuals (12 with skin cancer) from
As endemic areas and 44 healthy individuals
from outside
A clear relationship was observed between non-melanoma
skin cancer and p53 expressionin circulating lymphocytes.
Burgess et al. (2007) Mexico Cross-sectional 51 subjects in four communities in Mexico
water As ranges from 4.8 to 33.3 µg As/L
Drinking water with As was not associated with increased
DNA oxidation as measured by urinary 8-OHdG.
Andrew et al. (2006) Mexico Cross-sectional 16 and 37 people with high and low water
As (32µg/L and 0.7µg/L),
As exposure increases DNA damage and decreases repair
capabilities.

Table 2.

Studies describing genetic susceptibility in relation to arsenic-induced adverse health outcomes

Reference County Design Characteristics of subjects Main Findings
Loffredo et al. (2003) Mexico Cross-sectional 180 and 112 individuals exposed to high
and low water As (408 (µg/L and 30 (µg/L)
Gender differences varied by populations. Bimodal
distributions were observed in the ratios of DMA to InAs and
to MMA. The results of studies among the ethnic groups in
this study are consistent with the presence of functional
genetic polymorphisms in As methylation leading to
measurable differences in toxicity.
Del Razo et al. (1997) Mexico Cross-sectional 35 and 34 exposed to high and low water As
(0.408 mg/L and 0.031 mg/L)
Significant increases in the relative proportions of InAs and
MMA, accompanied by decreases of DMA were found in
exposed individuals.
Chung et al. (2002) Chile Cross-sectional 11 families with high drinking water As
(735–762 µg/L)
Methylation patterns aggregate in families and are correlated
in siblings, providing evidence of a genetic basis for the
variation in arsenic methylation.
Hopenhayn-Rich et al. (1996) Chile Cross-sectional 73 individuals drinking water with As 600
µg/L and intervened with low water As (45
µ/L) for two months
Decrease in As exposure associated with a small decrease in
In-As in urine as well as a decrease in the MMA/DMA ratio.
Study observed about 20% of the interindividual variability.
Genetic polymorphisms in As-methylating enzymes/cofactors
likely contribute to a large portion of the remaining
variability.
Hopenhayn-Rich et al. (1996) Chile Cross-sectional 122 high-exposure individuals (drinking
water: 600 µg As/L), 98 low-exposure
individuals (drinking water: 15 µg As/L)
MMA:DMA was 1.5 times greater in exposed group.
Differences in MMA:DMA were partially (30%) explained
through exposure, smoking, and gender.
Engstrom et al. (2007) Argentina Cross-sectional 147 women drinking water As 200 µg/L Polymorphisms in AS3MT - and possibly GSTM1, GSTT1,
MTR and MTHFR - are responsible for a large part of the
interindividual variation in As metabolism and susceptibility.
Meza et al. (2007) Mexico Cross-sectional 135 individuals exposed to water As
between 5.5 µg/L and 43.3 µgL
AS3MT individuals may suffer less risk from As exposure
than non-variant individuals. Regardless of AS3MT variant
status, children tend to have lower %MMA values than adults.
Engstrom et al. (2009) Argentina Cross-sectional
Cross-sectional
104 women drinking water 200 µg/L As Polymorphisms in AS3MT and in genes involved in one-carbon metabolism and reduction reactions affects As
metabolism.
Gomez-Rubio et al. (2010) Mexico Cross-sectional 405 individuals Genetic association analysis with As metabolism confirmed
the previously observed association between AS3MT
variats, including a large cluster of linked polymorphisms,
and As methylation efficiency.
Paiva et al. (2008) Chile Cross-sectional 281 (urinary As: 0–600 mg/L Heterozygotes inheriting the Val236 variant subunit would likely have a partial deficiency of GSTOl-1 (glutathione transferase omega 1) activity. Despite their effects on enzyme function, the known variants of GSTOl-1 do not appear to explain the observed variability in the excretion of inorganic arsenic.
Sampayo-Reyes et al. (2010) Mexico Cross-sectional 124 high-exposure individuals A positive association was found between the level of
exposure and the genetic damage (p < 0.001). AS3MT Met287Thr was found to significantly influence the effect among children carrying the 287Thr variant allele.
Marnell et al. (2003) Mexico Cross-sectional 75 individuals living in cities with varying
As in drinking water: 9, 17, 52, and 100
µg/L
Polymorphisms in the gene for MM A reductase/hGSTOl may be one of the reasons for the large interindividual variability in the response of humans to chronic As exposure.
Marcos et al. (2006) Chile Cross-sectional 105 smelting plant workers, 52 plant administrators, and 50 workers from
another copper mine with no significant exposure
High amounts of inorganic As and MMA were observed in
the most exposed workers compared to the least-exposed workers who excreted high amounts of DMA. A tendency
was observed between GSTM1 null and MMA excretion, as well as between GSTP1 val/val and DMA excretion.
Steinmaus et al. (2007) Argentina Cross-sectional 170 individuals from arsenic-exposed
region
This study provides evidence that MTHFR and GSTM1 are involved in As metabolism in humans, and polymorphisms in the genes that encode these enzymes may play a role in susceptibility to arsenic-induced cancer.
Engstrom et al. (2010) Argentina Cross-sectional 108 women drinking water with 200 µg/L The strongest association was found between %MMA and 8-oxo-G Inconsistencies between As and 8-oxodG stressed population variations in As metabolism.

Table 3.

Studies from Latin American countries showing association between arsenic exposure and bladder cancer mortality and incidence

Reference County Design Characteristics of subjects and exposure Measure Results/Main finding
Hopenhayn-Rich et al. (1996) Argentina Ecological Province of Cordoba (Approximately
2,750,000 inhabitants.
Bladder cancer mortality
SMR (95% CI)
Men: 0.80 (0.66–0.96), 1.42 (1.14–1.74),
2.14 (1.78–2.53) and
Women: 1.21 (0.85–1.64), 1.58 (1.01–
2.35), 1.82 (1.19–2.64) with water As
cone. <40, >40–178, and >178 µg/L.
Moore et al. (1997) Chile Cohort 70 and 55 males with chronic high and low As
exposure (600µg/L and 15µg/L).
Measure of micronuclei
cell in urinary As.
Micronuclei in with increased urinary As
(53.9 to 728.9 µg/L)
p for trend < 0.001
Smith et al. (1998) Chile Ecological Roughly 400,000 residents in Region II (Avg.
water As 570 µg/L) from 1955–1969
Bladder cancer mortality
SMR (95% CI)
Men: 6.0 (4.8–7.4) and
women 8.2(6.3–10.5)
Moore et al. (2002) Argentina Case-case 123 bladder cancer patients, exposed to As in
drinking water.
Mean chromosomal
alterations in tumor with
increasing exposure
Changes in chromosomal alterations:
5.7, 5.6, 7.3, and 9.1 compared to As
cone. <10, 10–99, 100–299, >299 (p for
trend=.02)
Bates et al. (2004) Argentina Case-control 114 case-control pairs Bladder cancer
OR (95% CI)
2.5(1.1–5.5)
Steinmaus et al. (2006) Argentina Case-control 114 cases-control pairs Bladder cancer
OR (95% CI)
High %MMA in
Smokers: 2.17 (1.02–4.63) and Non-smokers: 0.48(0.17–1.33)
Marshall et al. (2007) Chile Ecologic Mortality data on 525,715 from Region II and
Region V between 1950 and 2000
Bladder cancer mortality
RR (95% CI)
Men: 6.10 (3.97–9.39)
Women: 13.8 (7.74–24.5)
Valenzuela et al.(2007) Mexico Cross-
sectional
51 -person high exposure group, 21 -person low
exposure group
TGF-a in exfoliated
bladder urothelial cells (BUC) in people living in high vs. low As exposed
area and with or without skin lesions.
TGF-α concentration:
High vs. low As (128.8 pg/mg vs. 64.4
pg/mg, p<0.05); and
With and without skin lesion
(157.7pg/mg vs. 64.9 pg/mg, p<0.05)

Table 4.

Studies from Latin American countries showing association between arsenic exposure and lung cancer mortality and incidence

Reference County Design Characteristics of subjects Measure Result
Hopenhayn-Rich et al. (1998) Argentina Ecological Population data from Cordoba (~2,750,000) Lung cancer mortality
SMR (95% CI)
Lung cancer:
Men 0.92 (0.85–0.98), 1.54 (1.44–1.64),
1.77(1.63–1.90),
Women: 1.24 (1.06–1.42), 1.34 (1.12–1.58),
2.16 (1.83–2.52) with increasing water As
conc. (<40, 40–178, and >178 ug/L).
Smith et al. (1998) Chile Ecological Roughly 400,000 individuals in Region II
(exposure: 570 µg/L from 1955–1969,
decreased to less than 100 µg/L by 1980)
Lung cancer mortality
SMR (95% CI)
Men: 3.8 (3.5–4.1)
Women: 3.1 (2.7–3.7))
Ferreccio et al. (2000) Chile Case-Control 152 lung cancer cases and 419 controls Lung cancer
OR (95% CI)
1.6 (0.5–5.3), 3.9 (1.2–12.3), 5.2 (2.3–11.7)
and 8.9 (4.0–19.6) with increasing water As
conc. (<10, 10–29, 30–49, 50–199 and 200–
400 ug/L).
Smith et al. (2006) Chile Ecological Region II compared to the remaining regions
of Chile (Region II exposure ~870 µg/L As in
drinking water, 1958–1970)
Lung cancer mortality
SMR (95% CI)
Early life exposure: 7.0 (5.4–8.9), and
In utero exposure: 6.1 (3.5–9.9)
Marshall et al. (2007) Chile Ecologic Mortality data on 525,715 from Region II and
Region V between 1950 and 2000
Lung cancer mortality
RR (95% CI)
Men: 3.61(3.13–4.16)
Women: 3.26 (2.50–4.23)
Steinmaus et al. (2010) Argentina Case-control 45 lung cancer cases and 75 controls Lung cancer
OR (95% CI)
3.09 (1.08–8.81), upper tertile %MMA
compared to the lowest tertile
Effects of arsenic exposure on biomarker and chronic diseases observed in Latin American countries
Reference County Design Characteristics of subjects Measure Result
Garcia-Vargas et al. (1991) Mexico Cohort 21 and 19 individuals exposed to water As
0.390 mg/L and 0.012 mg/L respectively.
Indicators of heme metabolism An inversion of the
coproporphyrin/uroporphyrin (COPRO/ URO) ratio was observed in most exposed
individuals. This was caused by a decrease
in coproporphyrin excretion and an increase
in uroporphyrin excretion.
Garcia-Vargas et al. (1994) Mexico Cohort 36 and 31 individuals exposed to water As:
0.400 mg/L and 0.020 mg/L respectively.
Indicators of heme metabolism Significant reductions in coproporphyrin III excretion resulting in decreases in the COPRO III/COPROI ratio, and an increases in uroporphyrin excretion in As exposed individuals.
Hernandez-Zavala et al. (1999) Mexico Cohort 17 individuals from 3 villages with water As conc: 0.3 mg/L, 0.4 mg/L, 0.014 mg As/L Indicators of heme metabolism Significant increases in porphobilinogen deaminase (PBG-D) and uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase (URO- D) activities in peripheral blood erythrocytes; increases in the urinary excretion of total porphyrins, and increases in the COPRO/URO and COPROIII/COPROI ratios in highly exposed individuals.
Smith et al. (2000) Chile Cross-sectional 44 and 31 participants drinking water As 750–800 µg/L, and 10 µg/L respectively Overall prevalence
with more than 20
years residence
Skin lesion prevalence among exposed: 67% (95% CI = 22–96%)
Rosales-Castillo et al. (2004) Mexico Case-control 42 cases, 48 controls (previous exposure to drinking water As 416 µg/L and 12 µg/L) OR non-melanoma
skin cancer (NMSC)
16.5 (P = 0.001), high arsenic exposure and HPV seropositivity
Smith et al. (2006) Chile Ecological Region II compared to the remaining regions
of Chile (Region II exposure ~870 µg/L As in drinking water, 1958–1970)
Bronchiectasis
mortality
SMR (95% CI)
Born just before the high-exposure period
(1950–1957): 12.4(3.3–31.7).
Born during the high-exposure period: 46.2
(21.1–87.7)
Coronado-Gonzalez et al. (2007) Mexico Case-control 200 diabetics and 200 controls Diabetes prevalence
OR (95% CI)
2.16 (1.23–3.79) and
2.84 (1.64 −4.92) with increasing urinary As
Yuan et al. (2007) Chile Ecological Mortality from 1950 to 2000 in the As-
exposed region II of Chile (population:
477,000 in 2000) in compared to the
unexposed region V.
Mortality from acute
myocardial infarction
(AMI)
RR (95% CI)
1.48 (1.37–1.59), p < 0.001), men;
1.26 (1.14–1.40), p < 0.001), women
Valenzuela et al. (2009) Mexico Case-control 71 cases with skin lesions and 51 controls Risk of skin lesions
OR (95% CI)
Skin lesion risk: 4.28 (1.0–18.5), carriers of C (TC+CC) allele (Thr)
Yuan et al. (2010) Chile Ecological Arsenic endemic region II compared
unexposed region V.
Peak kidney caner
mortality in 1981–
1985
RR (95% CI)
Male: 3.4 (2.2–5.1)
Female: 4.4 (3.0–6.4)
Early-life exposure 7.1 (3.1–14)

Table 5.

Effects on arsenic as a consequence of early life and in utero exposure

Reference County Design Characteristics of subjects Measure Result
Concha et al. (1998) Argentina Cross-sectional 11 women in late gestation (exposed to 200 µg/liter drinking water arsenic) Urinary As metabolite %DMA In newborns and mothers in late gestation 90% urinary As was DMA compared to
70% in nonpregnant women (p < 0.001)
Concha et al. (1998) Argentina Cross-sectional 10 lactating women and two nursing babies (drinking water arsenic ~200 µg/1) Total maternal blood urinary and milk As 10 µg/l, 320 µg/l, 2.3 µg/kg fresh weight
Concha et al. (1998) Argentina Cross-sectional 96 women and children, from two villages of high drinking water arsenic exposure (200
µg/l) and one of low exposure (0.65 µg As/1)
Urinary As
metabolites
Inorganic As in urine: about 50% in
children versus 32% in women. Relative to other studies, there was very little MMA excreted.
Hopenhayn-Rich et al. (2000) Chile Ecological Antofagasta (exposure: ~860 µg/L As in drinking water 1958–1970, abruptly declined
to ~110 µg/L in 1971), Valparaiso (reference)
RR (95% CI) 1.7 (1.5–1.9), late fetal mortality;
1.53 (1.4–1.7), neonatal mortality;
1.26 (1.2–1.3), postneonatal mortality
Calderon et al. (2001) Mexico Cross-sectional 41 children chronically exposed to arsenic and lead (AsU = 62.9+/−0.03 µgAs/g creatinine),
39 children with low exposure (40.2+/−0.03 µgAs/g creatinine), all 6–9 years of age
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Revised Version, for Mexico Higher levels of arsenic were significantly associated with lower performance on
WISC-RM factorsexamining long-term memory and linguistic abstraction.
Hopenhayn et al. (2003) Chile Prospective cohort 424 infants from a high-exposure town (40 µg As/L drinking water) and 420 from a low-exposure town (<1 µg As/L drinking water) Birth weight −57 g; 95% CI = −123 to 9
Hopenhayn et al. (2003) Chile Prospective cohort 26 mothers living in a high-exposure city (40
µg As/L drinking water)
Urinary As Initial mean value of 36.1 to a final value of 54.3 µg/L
Yanez et al. (2003) Mexico Cross-sectional 20 children of age 3–6 years from high-
exposure community (soil: 100 mg/kg of arsenic), 35 children of age 3–6 years from
low-exposure community
Comet assay PO.05
Hopenhayn et al. (2006) Chile Prospective cohort 810 women who gave birth to live singleton infants (drinking water As exposure: 40 µg/L
in exposure town, <1 µg/L for control town)
Adjusted percent As Third trimester: 49.4% vs. 17% (p< 0.0001)
Rocha-Amador et al. (2007) Mexico Cross-sectional 132 children, age 6–10 years (average
exposure in three separate towns: 5.8+/−1.3 µg/L, 169+/−0.9 µg/L, 194+/−1.3 µg/L)
Association between
As in drinking water
and Performance, Verbal, and Full IQ
scores
β= −4.30, −6.40, −6.15
Rosado et al. (2007) Mexico Cross-sectional 557 children, 6–8 years of age living within
3.5 km of a metallurgic smelter complex
Visual-Spatial
Abilities with Figure Design, the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, the WISC-RM Digit Span subscale, Visual Search, and Letter Sequencing Tests
Inverse association between U As and performance scores (p< 0.05)
Liaw et al. (2008) Chile Ecological Regions II and V (exposure region:
(exposure: ~870 µg/L As in drinking water 1958–1970, abruptly declined to ~110 µg/L in 1971)
Childhood liver cancer
mortality
RR (95% CI)
10.6(2.9–39.2)
Mendez-Gomez et al. (2008) Mexico Cross-sectional 65 children exposed simultaneously to arsenic and lead (93% of children had As in urine above 50 µg/L) Association of AsU
and DNA repair ability
β = −34.43, p = 0.019

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the funding support of United States National Institutes of Health (US NIH) Grants P42 ES10349, R01ES017541. We would like to thank Dr. Prosun Bhattacharya for his continued support and encouragement to conduct this research. J.B. thanks the National Science Council of Taiwan for financial support.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest and no competing financial interests.

References

  1. ACGIH. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) Biological exposure index (BEI) TLVs and BEIs. 7th Edition 2009. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ackerman AH, Creed PA, Parks AN, Fricke MW, Schwegel CA, Creed JT, et al. Comparison of a chemical and enzymatic extraction of arsenic from rice and an assessment of the arsenic absorption from contaminated water by cooked rice. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;39:5241–5246. doi: 10.1021/es048150n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adonis M, Martinez V, Marin P, Berrios D, Gil L. Smoking habit and genetic factors associated with lung cancer in a population highly exposed to arsenic. Toxicol Lett. 2005a;159:32–37. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Adonis M, Martinez V, Marin P, Gil L. CYP1 Al and GSTM1 genetic polymorphisms in lung cancer populations exposed to arsenic in drinking water. Xenobiotica. 2005b;35:519–530. doi: 10.1080/00498250500057310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Andrew AS, Burgess JL, Meza MM, Demidenko E, Waugh MG, Hamilton JW, et al. Arsenic exposure is associated with decreased DNA repair in vitro and in individuals exposed to drinking water arsenic. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1193–1198. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Archer J, Hudson-Edwards KA, Preston DA, Howarth RJ, Linge K. Aqueous exposure and uptake of arsenic by riverside communities affected by mining contamination in the Río Pilcomayo basin, Bolivia. Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland. 2005;69(5):719–736. [Google Scholar]
  7. Argos M, Kalra T, Rathouz PJ, Chen Y, Pierce B, Parvez F, et al. Arsenic exposure from drinking water, and all-cause and chronic-disease mortalities in Bangladesh (HEALS): a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2010;376:252–258. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60481-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Armienta MA, Segovia N. Arsenic and fluoride in the groundwater of Mexico. Environ Geochem Health. 2008;30:345–353. doi: 10.1007/s10653-008-9167-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Arriaza B, Amarasiriwardenad D, Cornejob L, Standenc V, Byrned S, Bartkusd L, et al. Exploring chronic arsenic poisoning in pre-Columbian Chilean mummies. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2010;37:1274–1278. [Google Scholar]
  10. Astolfi E, Besuschio SC, Fernandez JC, Guerra C, Maccagno A. Hidroarsenicismo Crónico Regional Endémico. Talleres Graficos de La Cooperativa Gral. Belgrano: Buenos Aires; 1982. [Google Scholar]
  11. Basu A, Som A, Ghoshal S, Mondal L, Chaubey A, Bhilwade H, et al. Assessment of DNA damage in peripheral blood lymphocytes of individuals susceptible to arsenic induced toxicity in best Bengal, India. Toxicology Letters. 2005;159:100–112. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bates MN, Rey OA, Biggs ML, Hopenhayn C, Moore LE, Kalman D, et al. Case-control study of bladder cancer and exposure to arsenic in Argentina. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159:381–389. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bhattacharya P, Classon M, Bundschuh J, Sracek O, Fagerberg J, Jacks G, et al. Distribution and mobility of arsenic in the río Dulce alluvial aquifers in Santiago del Estero Province, Argentina. Sci. Total Environ. 2006;358:97–120. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.04.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Biggs ML, Kalman D, Moore L, Hopenhayn-Rich C, Smith M, Smith A. Relationship of urinary arsenic to intake estimates and a biomarker of effect, bladder cell micronuclei. Mutation Research. 1997;386:185–195. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5742(97)00012-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Borgoño J, Vincent P, Venturino H, Infante A. Arsenic in the drinking water of the city of Antofagasta: Epidemiological and clinical study before and after the installation of a treatment plant. Environmental Health Perspectives. 1977;19:103–105. doi: 10.1289/ehp.19-1637404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bundschuh J, Farías B, Martin R, Storniolo A, Bhattacharya P, Cortes J, et al. Groundwater arsenic in the Chaco-Pampean Plain, Argentina: case study from Robles county, Santiago del Estero Province. Appl. Geochem. 2004;19:231–243. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bundschuh J, Garcia ME, Birkle P, Cumbal LH, Bhattacharya P, Matschullat J. Occurrence, health effects and remediation of arsenic in groundwaters of Latin America. Natural Arsenic in Ground Water. In: Bundschuh J, Bhattacharya P, editors. Arsenic in the environment. 2008. p. 1. (series editors) [Google Scholar]
  18. Bundschuh J, Litter MI, Bhattacharya P. Targeting arsenic-safe aquifers for drinking water supplies. Environ Geochem Health. 2010a doi: 10.1007/s10653-010-9308-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bundschuh J, Litter MI, Nicoli HB, Hoinkis J, Bhattacharya P. Identifying occurrences of groundwater arsenic in Latin America: A continent wide problem and challenge. Arsenic in Geosphere and Human Disease; Page Proceedings of Arsenic in the Environment Conference in Taiwan; London: Tyler and Francis Group; 2010b. pp. 512–516. [Google Scholar]
  20. Calderon J, Navarro ME, Jimenez-Capdeville ME, Santos-Diaz MA, Golden A, Rodriguez-Leyva I, et al. Exposure to arsenic and lead and neuropsychological development in Mexican children. Environ Res. 2001;85:69–76. doi: 10.1006/enrs.2000.4106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Castro de Esparza M. The presence of arsenic in drinking water in Latin America and its effect on public health. In: Bundschuh J, Bhattacharya P, editors. Arsenic in the environment. Vol. 1. 2009. pp. 17–29. Serise. [Google Scholar]
  22. Chung JS, Kalman DA, Moore LE, Kosnett MJ, Arroyo AP, Beeris M, et al. Family correlations of arsenic methylation patterns in children and parents exposed to high concentrations of arsenic in drinking water. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110:729–733. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Concha G, Broberg K, Grander M, Cardozo A, Palm B, Vahter M. High-level exposure to lithium, boron, cesium, and arsenic via drinking water in the Andes of northern Argentina. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44:6875–6880. doi: 10.1021/es1010384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Concha G, Nermell B, Vahter M. Spatial and temporal variations in arsenic exposure via drinking-water in northern Argentina. J Health Popul Nutr. 2006;24:317–326. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Concha G, Nermell B, Vahter MV. Metabolism of inorganic arsenic in children with chronic high arsenic exposure in northern Argentina. Environ Health Perspect. 1998a;106:355–359. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Concha G, Vogler G, Lezcano D, Nermell B, Vahter M. Exposure to inorganic arsenic metabolites during early human development. Toxicol Sci. 1998b;44:185–190. doi: 10.1006/toxs.1998.2486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Concha G, Vogler G, Nermell B, Vahter M. Low-level arsenic excretion in breast milk of native Andean women exposed to high levels of arsenic in the drinking water. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1998c;71:42–46. doi: 10.1007/s004200050248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Coronado-Gonzalez JA, Del Razo LM, Garcia-Vargas G, Sanmiguel-Salazar F, Escobedo-de la Pena J. Inorganic arsenic exposure and type 2 diabetes mellitus in Mexico. Environ Res. 2007;104:383–389. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2007.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Cuevas A, Bundschuh J. Gogenic arsenic in Nicaragua: Occurrence and health effects. 2010 Un publisehd data. [Google Scholar]
  30. Del Razo LM, Aguilar C, Sierra-Santoyo A, Cebrian ME. Interference in the quantitation of methylated arsenic species in human urine. J Anal Toxicol. 1999;23:103–107. doi: 10.1093/jat/23.2.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Del Razo LM, Garcia-Vargas GG, Garcia-Salcedo J, Sanmiguel MF, Rivera M, Hernandez MC, et al. Arsenic levels in cooked food and assessment of adult dietary intake of arsenic in the Region Lagunera, Mexico. Food Chem Toxicol. 2002;40:1423–1431. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(02)00074-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Del Razo LM, Garcia-Vargas GG, Vargas H, Albores A, Gonsebatt ME, Montero R, et al. Altered profile of urinary arsenic metabolites in adults with chronic arsenicism. A pilot study. Arch Toxicol. 1997;71:211–217. doi: 10.1007/s002040050378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Díaz-Barriga F, Santos MA, Mejía JJ, Batres L, Yáñez L, Carrizales L, et al. Arsenic and cadmium exposure in children living near a smelter complex in San Luis Potosí, Mexico. Environ Res. 1993;62(2):242–250. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1993.1109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Diaz OP, Leyton I, Munoz O, Nunez N, Devesa V, Suner MA, et al. Contribution of water, bread, and vegetables (raw and cooked) to dietary intake of inorganic arsenic in a rural village of Northern Chile. J Agric Food Chem. 2004;52:1773–1779. doi: 10.1021/jf035168t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Dulout FN, Grillo CA, Seoane Al, Maderna CR, Nilsson R, Vahter M, et al. Chromosomal aberrations in peripheral blood lymphocytes from native Andean women and children from northwestern Argentina exposed to arsenic in drinking water. Mutat Res. 1996;370:151–158. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1218(96)00060-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Engstrom K, Broberg K, Concha G, Nermell B, Warholm M, Vahter M. Genetic polymorphisms influencing arsenic metabolism: evidence from Argentina. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115:599–605. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Engstrom K, Nermell B, Concha G, Stromberg U, Vahter M, Broberg K. Arsenic metabolism is influenced by polymorphisms in genes involved in one-carbon metabolism and reduction reactions. Mutat Res. 2009;667:4–14. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2008.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Engstrom KS, Vahter M, Lindh C, Teichert F, Singh R, Concha G, et al. Low 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine levels and influence of genetic background in an Andean population exposed to high levels of arsenic. Mutat Res. 2010;683:98–105. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2009.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Farías S, Bianco de Salas G, Servant RE, Mitre BG, Escalante J, Ponce RI, et al. Survey of arsenic in drinking water and assessment of the intake of arsenic from water in Argentinie Pune. Natural Arsenic in Ground Water. In: Bundschuh J, Bhattacharya P, editors. Arsenic in the environment. Volume 1. 2008. Chaper 41. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ferreccio C, Gonzalez C, Milosavjlevic V, Marshall G, Sancha AM, Smith AH. Lung cancer and arsenic concentrations in drinking water in Chile. Epidemiology. 2000;11:673–679. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200011000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ferreccio C, Sancha AM. Arsenic exposure and its impact on health in Chile. J Health Popul Nutr. 2006;24:164–175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Gomez-Rubio P, Meza-Montenegro MM, Cantu-Soto E, Klimecki WT. Genetic association between intronic variants in AS3MT and arsenic methylation efficiency is focused on a large linkage disequilibrium cluster in chromosome 10. J Appl Toxicol. 2010;30:260–270. doi: 10.1002/jat.1492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Gómez A. Chronic arseniasis in El Zapote, Nicaragua. In: Bundschuh J, Armienta MA, Birkle P, Bhattacharya P, Matschullat J, Mukherjee AB, editors. Natural Arsenic in Groundwaters of Latin America. Tyler and Francis Group; 2008. Series Chaper 42. [Google Scholar]
  44. Gonsebatt ME, Vega L, Salazar AM, Montero R, Guzmiin P, Blas J, et al. Cytogenetic effects in human exposure to arsenic. Mutation Research. 1997;386:219–228. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5742(97)00009-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Goyenechea M. Sobre la nueva enfermedad descubierta en Bell-Ville. Rev Med de Rosario. 1917;7:485. [Google Scholar]
  46. Guber RS, Tefaha L, Arias N, Sandoval N, Toledo R, Fernández M, et al. Contenido de arsénico en el agua de consumo en Leales y Graneros (Provincia de Tucumán - Argentina) Acta Bioquím. Clín. Latinoam. 2009;43:201–207. [Google Scholar]
  47. Hernández-Zavala A, Del Razo LM, Aguilar C, García-Vargas GG, Borja VH, Cebrián ME. Alteration in bilirubin excretion in individuals chronically exposed to arsenic in Mexico. Toxicology Letters. 1998;99:79–84. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4274(98)00115-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Hopenhayn-Rich C, Biggs ML, Fuchs A, Bergoglio R, Tello EE, Nicolli H, et al. Bladder cancer mortality associated with arsenic in drinking water in Argentina. Epidemiology. 1996a;7:117–124. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199603000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Hopenhayn-Rich C, Biggs ML, Kalman DA, Moore LE, Smith AH. Arsenic methylation patterns before and after changing from high to lower concentrations of arsenic in drinking water. Environ Health Perspect. 1996b;104:1200–1207. doi: 10.1289/ehp.961041200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Hopenhayn-Rich C, Biggs ML, Smith AH. Lung and kidney cancer mortality associated with arsenic in drinking water in Cordoba, Argentina. Int J Epidemiol. 1998;27:561–569. doi: 10.1093/ije/27.4.561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Hopenhayn-Rich C, Biggs ML, Smith AH, Kalman DA, Moore LE. Methylation study of a population environmentally exposed to arsenic in drinking water. Environ Health Perspect. 1996c;104:620–628. doi: 10.1289/ehp.96104620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Hopenhayn-Rich C, Browning SR, Hertz-Picciotto I, Ferreccio C, Peralta C, Gibb H. Chronic arsenic exposure and risk of infant mortality in two areas of Chile. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108:667–673. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Hopenhayn C, Bush HM, Bingcang A, Hertz-Picciotto I. Association between arsenic exposure from drinking water and anemia during pregnancy. J Occup Environ Med. 2006;48:635–643. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000205457.44750.9f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Hopenhayn C, Ferreccio C, Browning SR, Huang B, Peralta C, Gibb H, et al. Arsenic exposure from drinking water and birth weight. Epidemiology. 2003a;14:593–602. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000072104.65240.69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Hopenhayn C, Huang B, Christian J, Peralta C, Ferreccio C, Atallah R, et al. Profile of urinary arsenic metabolites during pregnancy. Environ Health Perspect. 2003b;111:1888–1891. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Hurtado-Jimenez R, Gardea-Torresdey JL. Arsenic in drinking water in the Los Altos de Jalisco region of Mexico. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2006;20:236–247. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892006000900004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. IPCS. International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) Arsenic and Arsenic Compounds [Internet] Environmental Health Criteria 224, International Programme on Chemical Safety 2001 [cited Jun 2009] 2001 Available from: http//www.int/ipcs/publications/ehc_224/en/
  58. Lavanchy Dougnac M. Proceedings XIII Congreso de Ingeniería Sanitaria y Ambiental AIDIS. Antofagasta, Chile; 1999. Oct, Efectos de la contaminación por arsénico del Río Loa en moluscos del litoral de la primera y segunda regiones. 1999. [Google Scholar]
  59. Lerda D. Sister-chromatid exchange (SCE) among individuals chronically exposed to arsenic in drinking water. Mutat Res. 1994;312:111–120. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(94)90015-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Liaw J, Marshall G, Yuan Y, Ferreccio C, Steinmaus C, Smith AH. Increased childhood liver cancer mortality and arsenic in drinking water in northern Chile. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:1982–1987. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Loffredo CA, Aposhian HV, Cebrian ME, Yamauchi H, Silbergeld EK. Variability in human metabolism of arsenic. Environ Res. 2003;92:85–91. doi: 10.1016/s0013-9351(02)00081-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Macedo LFL. Remoção de mercúrio e arseênio em cação-azul, Prionace glauca. São Paulo, Brazil: MSc Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  63. Marcos R, Martinez V, Hernandez A, Creus A, Sekaran C, Tokunaga H, et al. Metabolic profile in workers occupationally exposed to arsenic: role of GST polymorphisms. J Occup Environ Med. 2006;48:334–341. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000194149.17574.3c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Marnell LL, Garcia-Vargas GG, Chowdhury UK, Zakharyan RA, Walsh B, Avram MD, et al. Polymorphisms in the human monomethylarsonic acid (MMA V) reductase/hGSTOl gene and changes in urinary arsenic profiles. Chem Res Toxicol. 2003;16:1507–1513. doi: 10.1021/tx034149a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Marshall G, Ferreccio C, Yuan Y, Bates MN, Steinmaus C, Selvin S, et al. Fifty-year study of lung and bladder cancer mortality in Chile related to arsenic in drinking water. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:920–928. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Martinez V, Creus A, Venegas W, Arroyo A, Beck JP, Gebel TW, et al. Evaluation of micronucleus induction in a Chilean population environmentally exposed to arsenic. Mutat Res. 2004;564:65–74. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2004.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Martinez V, Creus A, Venegas W, Arroyo A, Beck JP, Gebel TW, et al. Micronuclei assessment in buccal cells of people environmentally exposed to arsenic in northern Chile. Toxicol Lett. 2005;155:319–327. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2004.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Matschullat J, Birmann K, Ricardo P, Borba RP, et al. Long-term environmental impact of Arsenic-dispersion in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Trace Metals and other Contaminants in the Environment. 2007;9:355–372. [Google Scholar]
  69. Matschullat J, Perobelli B, Deschamps E, Ribeiro Figueiredo B, Gabrio T, Schwenk M. Human and environmental contamination in the Iron Quadrangle, Brazil. Appl. Geochem. 2000;15:181–190. [Google Scholar]
  70. Mendez-Gomez J, Garcia-Vargas GG, Lopez-Carrillo L, Calderon-Aranda ES, Gomez A, Vera E, et al. Genotoxic effects of environmental exposure to arsenic and lead on children in region Lagunera, Mexico. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1140:358–367. doi: 10.1196/annals.1454.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Meza M, Gandolfi AJ, Klimecki WT. Developmental and genetic modulation of arsenicbiotransformation: a gene by environment interaction? Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2007;222:381–387. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2006.12.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Moore LE, Smith AH, Eng C, Kalman D, DeVries S, Bhargava V, et al. Arsenic-related chromosomal alterations in bladder cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:1688–1696. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.22.1688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Moore LE, Smith AH, Hopenhayn-Rich C, Biggs ML, Kalman DA, Smith MT. Decrease in bladder cell micronucleus prevalence after intervention to lower the concentration of arsenic in drinking water. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997;6:1051–1056. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Moore LE, Wiencke JK, Bates MN, Zheng S, Rey OA, Smith AH. Investigation of genetic polymorphisms and smoking in a bladder cancer case-control study in Argentina. Cancer Lett. 2004;211:199–207. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2004.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Munoz O, Diaz OP, Leyton I, Nunez N, Devesa V, Suner MA, et al. Vegetables collected in the cultivated Andean area of northern Chile: total and inorganic arsenic contents in raw vegetables. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50:642–647. doi: 10.1021/jf011027k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Navoni J, González Cid M, Olivera M, Tschambler J, Bovi Mitre G, Larripa I, et al. Daño al ADN asociado al contenido de arsénico urinario en una población de jóvenes expuesta al arsénico por el agua de bebida. Acta Toxicológica Argentina. 2006a;14(Sup):48–51. [Google Scholar]
  77. Navoni J, González Cid M, Olivera M, Tschambler J, Bovi Mitre G, Larripa I, et al. Danño al ADN asociado al contenido de arsénico urinario en una población de jóvenes expuesta al arsénico por el agua de bebida. Acta Toxicológica Argentina. 2006b;14(Sup):48–51. [Google Scholar]
  78. Navoni J, Olivera NM, E VL. Validación metodológica de la cuantificación de Arsénico por inyección en flujo-generación de hidruros- espectrometría de absorción atómica previa derivatización con 1-cisteína (IF-GH-EAA) Acta Toxicológica Argentina. 2009;17(2):45–54. [Google Scholar]
  79. Navoni J, Olivera NM, E VL. Cuantificación de arsénico por inyección en flujo-generación de hidruros- espectrometría de absorción atómica (IF-GH-EAA) previa derivatización con L-cisteína. Validatión y comparación intermetodológica utilizando dos técnicas de referenda. Acta Toxicologia Argentina. 2010;18 in press. [Google Scholar]
  80. Navoni JA, Olivera N, Garcia S, E V. Evaluatión de riesgo por ingesta de arsénico inorgánico en poblaciones de zonas endémicas argentinas. La Alimentatión Latinoamericana. 2007;270:66–70. [Google Scholar]
  81. Ng JC, Wang J, Shraim A. A global health problem caused by arsenic from natural sources. Chemosphere. 2003;52:1353–1359. doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00470-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Nicolli HB, Suriano JM, Gómez MA, Ferpozzi LH, Baleani O. Groundwater contamination with arsenic and other trace elements in an area of the Pampa Province of Córdoba, Argentina. Environ. Geol. Water Sci. 1989;14:3–16. [Google Scholar]
  83. Nordstrom DK. Public health. Worldwide occurrences of arsenic in ground water. Science. 2002;296:2143–2145. doi: 10.1126/science.1072375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. O'Reilly J, Watts MJ, Shaw RA, Marcilla AL, Ward NI. Arsenic contamination of natural waters in San Juan and La Pampa, Argentina. Environ Geochem Health. 2010 doi: 10.1007/s10653-010-9317-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Ostrosky-Wegman P, Gonsebatt ME, Montero R, Vega L, Barba H, Espinosa J, et al. Lymphocyte proliferation kinetics and genotoxic findings in a pilot study on individuals chronically exposed to arsenic in Mexico. Mutat Res. 1991;250:477–482. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(91)90204-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Paiva L, Marcos R, Creus A, Coggan M, Oakley AJ, Board PG. Polymorphism of glutathione transferase Omega 1 in a population exposed to a high environmental arsenic burden. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2008;18:1–10. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e3282f29663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Paoloni JD, Sequeira ME, Fiorentino CE. Mapping of arsenic content and distribution in groundwater in the southeast Pampa, Argentina. J Environ Health. 2005;67:50–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Perez-Carrera A, Fernandez-Cirelli A. Arsenic concentration in water and bovine milk in Cordoba, Argentina. Preliminary results. J Dairy Res. 2005;72:122–124. doi: 10.1017/s0022029904000640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Pineda-Zavaleta AP, Gonzalo García-Vargas G, Victor Borja-Aburto H, Acosta-Saavedra LC, Vera Aguilar E, Gómez-Muñoz A, et al. Nitric oxide and superoxide anion production in monocytes from children exposed to arsenic and lead in region Lagunera, Mexico. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 2004;198:283–290. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2003.10.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Queirolo F, Stegen S, Restovic M, Paz M, Ostapczuk P, Schwuger MJ, et al. Total arsenic, lead,and cadmium levels in vegetables cultivated at the Andean villages of northern Chile. Sci Total Environ. 2000;255:75–84. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(00)00450-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Rocha-Amador D, Navarro ME, Carrizales L, Morales R, Calderon J. Decreased intelligence in children and exposure to fluoride and arsenic in drinking water. Cad Saude Publica. 2007;23(Suppl 4):S579–S587. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2007001600018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Rosado JL, Ronquillo D, Kordas K, Rojas O, Alatorre J, Lopez P, et al. Arsenic exposure and cognitive performance in Mexican schoolchildren. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115:1371–1375. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Rosales-Castillo JA, Acosta-Saavedra LC, Torres R, Ochoa-Fierro J, Borja-Aburto VH, Lopez-Carrillo L, et al. Arsenic exposure and human papillomavirus response in non-melanoma skin cancer Mexican patients: a pilot study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2004;77:418–423. doi: 10.1007/s00420-004-0527-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Rosenberg H. Systemic arterial disease and chronic arsenicism in infants. Arch Pathol. 1974:360–365. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Salazar AM, Calderon-Aranda E, Cebrian ME, Sordo M, Bendesky A, Gomez-Munoz A, et al. p53 expression in circulating lymphocytes of non-melanoma skin cancer patients from an arsenic contaminated region in Mexico. A pilot study. Mol Cell Biochem. 2004;255:25–31. doi: 10.1023/b:mcbi.0000007258.33942.f8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Samanta G, Chowdhury T, Mandal B, Biswas B, Chowdhury U, Basu G, et al. Flow injection hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry for determination of arsenic in water and biological samples from arsenic-affected districts of west Bengal, India and Bangladesh. Microchemical Journal. 1999;62:174. [Google Scholar]
  97. Sampayo-Reyes A, Hernandez A, El-Yamani N, Lopez-Campos C, Mayet-Machado E, Rincon-Castaneda CB, et al. Arsenic induces DNA damage in environmentally exposed Mexican children and adults. Influence of GSTOl and AS3MT polymorphisms. Toxicol Sci. 2010 doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfq173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Sancha AM, O'Ryan R. Managing hazardous pollutants in Chile: arsenic. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2008;196:123–146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Seidegard J, Ekstrom G. The role of human glutathione transferases and epoxide hydrolases in the metabolism of xenobiotics. Environ Health Perspect. 1997;105(Suppl 4):791–799. doi: 10.1289/ehp.105-1470052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Sigrist M, Beldoménnco H, MR R. Evaluation of the influence of arsenic levels in cow’s raw milk from Argentinean dairy farms. Food Chem. 2010;121:487–491. [Google Scholar]
  101. Smedley PL, Nicolli HB, Macdonald DMJ, Barros AJ, JO T. Hydrogeochemistry of arsenic and other inorganic constituents in groundwaters from La Pampa. Argentina. Applied Geochemistry. 2002;17:259–284. [Google Scholar]
  102. Smith AH, Arroyo AP, Mazumder DN, Kosnett MJ, Hernandez AL, Beeris M, et al. Arsenic-induced skin lesions among Atacameno people in Northern Chile despite good nutrition and centuries of exposure. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108:617–620. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Smith AH, Goycolea M, Haque R, Biggs ML. Marked increase in bladder and lung cancer mortality in a region of Northern Chile due to arsenic in drinking water. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147:660–669. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Smith AH, Marshall G, Yuan Y, Ferreccio C, Liaw J, von Ehrenstein O, et al. Increased mortality from lung cancer and bronchiectasis in young adults after exposure to arsenic in utero and in early childhood. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1293–1296. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Steinmaus C, Bates MN, Yuan Y, Kalman D, Atallah R, Rey OA, et al. Arsenic methylation and bladder cancer risk in case-control studies in Argentina and the United States. J Occup Environ Med. 2006;48:478–488. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000200982.28276.70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Steinmaus C, Moore LE, Shipp M, Kalman D, Rey OA, Biggs ML, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in MTHFR 677 and 1298, GSTM1 and T1, and metabolism of arsenic. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2007;70:159–170. doi: 10.1080/15287390600755240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Steinmaus C, Yuan Y, Kalman D, Rey OA, Skibola CF, Dauphine D, et al. Individual differences in arsenic metabolism and lung cancer in a case-control study in Cordoba, Argentina. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010;247:138–145. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2010.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Vahter M, Akesson A, Lind B, Bjors U, Schutz A, Berglund M. Longitudinal study of methylmercury and inorganic mercury in blood and urine of pregnant and lactating women, as well as in umbilical cord blood. Environ Res. 2000;84:186–194. doi: 10.1006/enrs.2000.4098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Vahter M, Concha C, Nermell B, Nilsson R, Dulout F, Natarajan AT. A unique metabolism of inorganic arsenic in native Andean women. European Journal of Pharmacology. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology Section. 1995;239:455–462. doi: 10.1016/0926-6917(95)90066-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Valenzuela OL, Borja-Aburto VH, Garcia-Vargas GG, Cruz-Gonzalez MB, Garcia-Montalvo EA, Calderon-Aranda ES, et al. Urinary trivalent methylated arsenic species in a population chronically exposed to inorganic arsenic. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:250–254. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Valenzuela OL, Germolec DR, Borja-Aburto VH, Contreras-Ruiz J, Garcia-Vargas GG, Del Razo LM. Chronic arsenic exposure increases TGFalpha concentration in bladder urothelial cells of Mexican populations environmentally exposed to inorganic arsenic. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2007;222:264–270. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2006.12.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Vega L, Soto G, Luna A, Acosta L, Conde P, Cebrian M, et al. Early sings of immunodepression indcued by arsenic in children. In: Bundschuh J, Bhattacharya P, editors. Arsenic in the environment. Volume 1. 2008. series Chapter 45. [Google Scholar]
  113. Vélez D, Yáñez N, R M. Determination of arsenobetaine in manufactured seafood products by liquid chromatography, microwave-assisted oxidation and hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry. Jr. Anal. Atom. Spectr. 1997;12:91–96. [Google Scholar]
  114. WHO. 33rd report of the Joint FAO/WHO expert Committee on Food Additives. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO); 1989. Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants. Technical Report Series 759. [Google Scholar]
  115. WHO. Background document for preparation of WHO Guidelines for drinking-water quality. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO/SDE/WSH/03.04/75); 2003. Arsenic in drinking-water. [Google Scholar]
  116. Wyatt CJ, Lopez Quiroga V, Olivas Acosta RT, Olivia Mendez R. Excretion of arsenic (As) in urine of children, 7–11 years, exposed to elevated levels of As in the city water supply in Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico. Environmental Research. 1998;78:19–24. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1998.3844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Yanez L, Garcia-Nieto E, Rojas E, Carrizales L, Mejia J, Calderon J, et al. DNA damage in blood cells from children exposed to arsenic and lead in a mining area. Environ Res. 2003;93:231–240. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2003.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Yuan Y, Marshall G, Ferreccio C, Steinmaus C, Liaw J, Bates M, et al. Kidney cancer mortality: fifty-year latency patterns related to arsenic exposure. Epidemiology. 2010;21:103–108. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181c21e46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Yuan Y, Marshall G, Ferreccio C, Steinmaus C, Selvin S, Liaw J, et al. Acute myocardial infarction mortality in comparison with lung and bladder cancer mortality in arsenic-exposed region II of Chile from 1950 to 2000. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166:1381–1391. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Zaldivar R. A morbid condition involving cardio-vascular, broncho-pulmonary, digestive and neural lesions in children and young adults after dietary arsenic exposure. Zentralbl Bakteriol [B] 1980;170(1–2):44–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Zaldivar R, Ghai G. Clinical epidemiological studies on endemic chronic arsenic poisoning in children and adults, including observations on children with high- and low-intake of dietary arsenic. Zentralbl Bakteriol [B] 1980;170(5–6):409–421. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES