Skip to main content
The Scientific World Journal logoLink to The Scientific World Journal
. 2014 Mar 18;2014:607347. doi: 10.1155/2014/607347

On Hardy-Pachpatte-Copson's Inequalities

Chang-Jian Zhao 1,*, Wing-Sum Cheung 2
PMCID: PMC3977539  PMID: 24778590

Abstract

We establish new inequalities similar to Hardy-Pachpatte-Copson's type inequalities. These results in special cases yield some of the recent results.

1. Introduction

The classical Hardy's integral inequality is as follows.

Theorem A —

If p > 1, f(x) ≥ 0 for 0 < x < , and F(x) = (1/x)∫0 x f(t)dt, then

0F(x)pdx<(pp1)p0f(x)pdx, (1)

unless f ≡ 0. The constant is the best possible.

Theorem A was first proved by Hardy [1], in an attempt to give a simple proof of Hilbert's double series theorem (see [2]). One of the best known and interesting generalization of the inequality (1) given by Hardy [3] himself can be stated as follows.

Theorem B —

If p > 1, m ≠ 1,f(x) ≥ 0 for 0 < x < , and F(x) is defined by

F(x)=0xf(t)dt,m>1;F(x)=xf(t)dt,m<1, (2)

then

0xmF(x)pdx<(p|m1|)p0xpmf(x)pdx, (3)

unless f ≡ 0. The constant is the best possible.

Inequalities (1) and (3) which later went by the name of Hardy's inequalities led to a great many papers dealing with alternative proofs, various generalizations, and numerous variants and applications in analysis (see [415]). In particular, Pachpatte [4] established some generalizations of Hardy inequalities (1) and (3). Very recently, Leng and Feng [16] proved some new Hardy-type integral inequalities. In the present paper we establish new inequalities similar to Hardy's integral inequalities (1) and (3). These results provide some new estimates to these types of inequalities and in special cases yield some of the recent results.

2. Main Results

Our main results are given in the following theorems.

Theorem —

Let a < b < R, c < d < R′, p > 1, q < 1, and α > 0 be constants. Let w(x, y) be positive and locally absolutely continuous in (a, b)×(c, d). Let h(x, y) be a positive continuous function and let H(x, y) = ∫a xc y h(s, t)dsdt, for (x, y)∈(a, b)×(c, d). Let f(x, y) be nonnegative and measurable on (a, b)×(c, d). If

D(x,y)=111qH(x,y)h(x,y)1w(x,y)w(x,y)xlog(H(R,R)H(x,y))+p1qH(x,y)h(x,y)×1r(x,y)r(x,y)xlog(H(R,R)H(x,y))1α, (4)

for almost all (x, y) ∈ (a, b) × (c, d), and if F(x, y) is defined by

F(x,y)=1r(x,y)axcyr(s,t)h(s,t)f(s,t)dsdt (5)

for (x, y)∈(a, b)×(c, d), then

cdabw(x,y)H(x,y)1h¯(x,y)×(log(H(R,R)H(x,y)))qF(x,y)pdxdy[α(p1q)]p×cdab[(log(H(R,R)H(x,y)))pqw(x,y)H(x,y)p1×  h(x,y)1pG(x,y)p]dxdy, (6)

where

h¯(x,y)=cyh(x,t)dt,G(x,y)=1r(x,y)cyr(x,t)h(x,t)f(x,t)dt. (7)

Remark 2 —

Let f(x, y), w(x, y), h(x, y), and r(x, y) reduce to f(x), w(x), h(x), and r(x), respectively, and with suitable modifications in Theorem 1, (6) changes to the following result:

abw(x)H(x)1h(x)(log(H(R)H(x)))qF(x)pdx[α(p1q)]p×ab[(log(H(R)H(x)))pq×w(x)H(x)p1h(x)f(x)p]dx. (8)

This is just a new inequality established by Pachpatte [4].

Moreover, we note that the inequality established in Theorem 1 is the further generalizations of the inequality established by Copson [17].

Taking for w(x) = r(x) = 1,  H(R) = R, and α = 1 in (8), (8) changes to the following result:

abH(x)1h(x)(log(RH(x)))qF(x)pdx(p1q)p×ab[(log(RH(x)))pqH(x)p1h(x)f(x)p]dx. (9)

This is just a new inequality established by Love [7].

Let h(x) = 1, a → 0,  b, and log⁡ (R/(xa)) = 1 in (9); then (9) changes to the following result:

0x1F(x)pdx(p1q)p0xp1f(x)pdx. (10)

This result is obtained in (3) stated in the Introduction.

Theorem 3 —

Let a < b < R, c < d < R′, p > 1, q > 1, and β > 0 be constants. Let w(x, y) be positive and locally absolutely continuous in (a, b)×(c, d). Let h(x, y) be a positive continuous function and let H(x, y) = ∫a xc y h(s, t)dsdt, for (x, y)∈(a, b)×(c, d). Let f(x, y) be nonnegative and measurable on (a, b)×(c, d). Let

E(x,y)=11q1H(x,y)h(x,y)1w(x,y)w(x,y)ylog(H(R,R)H(x,y))+pq1H(x,y)h(x,y)×1r(x,y)r(x,y)ylog(H(R,R)H(x,y))1β, (11)

for almost all (x, y)∈(a, b)×(c, d). If F(x, y) is defined by

F(x,y)=1r(x,y)xbydr(s,t)h(s,t)f(s,t)dsdt (12)

for (x, y)∈(a, b)×(c, d), then

cdabw(x,y)H(x,y)1h~(x,y)×(log(H(R,R)H(x,y)))qF(x,y)pdxdy[β(pq1)]p×cdab[(log(H(R,R)H(x,y)))pqw(x,y)H(x,y)p1×  h(x,y)1pL(x,y)p]dxdy, (13)

where

h~(x,y)=axh(s,y)ds, (14)

Remark 4 —

Let f(x, y), w(x, y), h(x, y), and r(x, y) reduce to f(x), w(x), h(x), and r(x), respectively, and with suitable modifications in Theorem 3, (13) changes to the following result:

abw(x)H(x)1h(x)(log(H(R)H(x)))qF(x)pdx[β(pq1)]pab[(log(H(R)H(x)))pq×w(x)H(x)p1h(x)f(x)p]dx. (15)

This is just a new inequality established by Pachpatte [4].

On the other hand, we note that the inequality established in Theorem 3 is the further generalizations of the inequality established by Copson [17].

Taking for w(x) = r(x) = 1, H(R) = R, and β = 1 in (15), (15) changes to the following result:

abH(x)1h(x)(log(RH(x)))qF(x)pdx(pq1)pab[(log(RH(x)))pq×H(x)p1h(x)f(x)p]dx. (16)

This is just a new inequality established by Love [7].

3. Proof of Theorems

Proof of Theorem 1

If we let u(x, y) = w(x, y)F(x, y)p and in view of

F(x,y)=1r(x,y)axcyr(s,t)h(s,t)f(s,t)dsdt (17)

for (x, y)∈(a, b)×(c, d), then

u(x,y)x=w(x,y)xF(x,y)p+w(x,y)pF(x,y)p1×(1r(x,y)cyr(x,t)h(x,t)f(x,t)dtr(x,y)/xr2(x,y)×axcyr(s,t)h(s,t)f(s,t)dsdt). (18)

Let

v(x,y)x=H(x,y)1h¯(x,y)[log(H(R,R)H(x,y))]q, (19)

where h¯(x,y)=cyh(x,t)dt and in view of H(x, y) = ∫a xc y h(s, t)dsdt, for (x, y)∈(a, b)×(c, d), then

v(x,y)=[log(H(R,R)/H(x,y))]q+1(q+1). (20)

From (18), (20), and integrating by parts for x, we have

cdabw(x,y)H(x,y)1h¯(x,y)×(log(H(R,R)H(x,y)))qF(x,y)pdxdy=cd{w(x,y)F(x,y)p×[log(H(R,R)/H(x,y))]q+1q+1|x=ax=bab[log(H(R,R)/H(x,y))]q+1q+1×[w(x,y)xF(x,y)p+w(x,y)pF(x,y)p1×(G(x,y)r(x,y)/xr2(x,y)×axcyr(s,t)h(s,t)×f(s,t)dsdt)]dx}dy, (21)

where

G(x,y)=1r(x,y)cyr(x,t)h(x,t)f(x,t)dt. (22)

If q < 1, then we observe that

cdabD(x,y)w(x,y)H(x,y)1h¯(x,y)×(log(H(R,R)H(x,y)))qF(x,y)pdxdyp1qcdab[w(x,y)(log(H(R,R)H(x,y)))q+1×G(x,y)F(x,y)p1]dxdy=p1q×cdab[{(log(H(R,R)H(x,y)))q}1/p×log(H(R,R)H(x,y))w(x,y)1/p×H(x,y)(p1)/p×h(x,y)(p1)/pG(x,y)]×[{(log(H(R,R)H(x,y)))q}(p1)/p×w(x,y)(p1)/p×[H(x,y)1×h(x,y)](p1)/p×F(x,y)p1]dxdy. (23)

By applying Hölder's inequality with indices p, p/(p − 1) on the right side of (23), we obtain

cdabw(x,y)H(x,y)1h¯(x,y)×(log(H(R,R)H(x,y)))qF(x,y)pdxdyα(p1q)×{cdab[(log(H(R,R)H(x,y)))q×(log(H(R,R)H(x,y)))p×w(x,y)H(x,y)p1×h(x,y)(p1)G(x,y)p]dxdy}1/p×{cdab[(log(H(R,R)H(x,y)))qw(x,y)H(x,y)1×h(x,y)F(x,y)p]dxdy}(p1)/p. (24)

Dividing both sides of (24) by the second integral factor on the right side of (24) and raising both sides to the pth power, we obtain

cdabw(x,y)H(x,y)1h¯(x,y)×(log(H(R,R)H(x,y)))qF(x,y)pdxdy[α(p1q)]p×cdab[(log(H(R,R)H(x,y)))pq×w(x,y)H(x,y)p1×h(x,y)(p1)G(x,y)p]dxdy. (25)

Proof of Theorem 3

If we let u(x, y) = w(x, y)F(x, y)p and in view of

F(x,y)=1r(x,y)xbydr(s,t)h(s,t)f(s,t)dsdt (26)

for (x, y)∈(a, b)×(c, d), then

u(x,y)y=w(x,y)yF(x,y)p+w(x,y)pF(x,y)p1×(1r(x,y)ydr(x,t)h(x,t)f(x,t)dtr(x,y)/yr2(x,y)xbydr(s,t)h(s,t)f(s,t)dsdt). (27)

Let

v(x,y)y=H(x,y)1h~(x,y)[log(H(R,R)H(x,y))]q, (28)

where h~(x,y)=axh(s,y)ds and in view of H(x, y) = ∫a xc y h(s, t)dsdt, for (x, y)∈(a, b)×(c, d), then

v(x,y)=[log(H(R,R)/H(x,y))]q+1(q+1). (29)

From (27), (29), and integrating by parts for y, we have

cdabw(x,y)H(x,y)1h~(x,y)×(log(H(R,R)H(x,y)))qF(x,y)pdxdy=ab{w(x,y)F(x,y)p×[log(H(R,R)/H(x,y))]q+1q+1|y=cy=dcd[log(H(R,R)/H(x,y))]q+1q+1×[w(x,y)yF(x,y)p+w(x,y)pF(x,y)p1×(L(x,y)r(x,y)yr2(x,y)×xbydr(s,t)h(s,t)×f(s,t)dsdt)]dy}dx, (30)

where

L(x,y)=1r(x,y)xbr(s,y)h(s,y)f(s,y)ds. (31)

If q > 1, then we observe that

cdabE(x,y)w(x,y)H(x,y)1h~(x,y)×(log(H(R,R)H(x,y)))qF(x,y)pdxdypq1cdab[w(x,y)(log(H(R,R)H(x,y)))q+1×L(x,y)F(x,y)p1]dxdy=pq1×cdab[{(log(H(R,R)H(x,y)))q}1/p×log(H(R,R)H(x,y))w(x,y)1/pH(x,y)(p1)/p×  h(x,y)(p1)/pL(x,y)]×[{(log(H(R,R)H(x,y)))q}(p1)/p×w(x,y)(p1)/p×[H(x,y)1×h(x,y)](p1)/p×F(x,y)p1]dxdy. (32)

By applying Hölder's inequality with indices p, p/(p − 1) on the right side of (32), we obtain

cdabw(x,y)H(x,y)1h~(x,y)×(log(H(R,R)H(x,y)))qF(x,y)pdxdyβ(pq1)×{cdab[(log(H(R,R)H(x,y)))q×(log(H(R,R)H(x,y)))pw(x,y)H(x,y)p1×  h(x,y)(p1)L(x,y)p]dxdy}1/p×{cdab[(log(H(R,R)H(x,y)))q×w(x,y)H(x,y)1×h(x,y)F(x,y)p]dxdy}(p1)/p. (33)

Dividing both sides of (33) by the second integral factor on the right side of (33) and raising both sides to the pth power, we obtain

cdabw(x,y)H(x,y)1h~(x,y)×(log(H(R,R)H(x,y)))q×F(x,y)pdxdy[β(pq1)]p×cdab[(log(H(R,R)H(x,y)))pqw(x,y)H(x,y)p1×h(x,y)(p1)L(x,y)p]dxdy. (34)

Acknowledgments

Chang-Jian Zhao's research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (11371334). Wing-Sum Cheung's research is partially supported by a HKU URG grant.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  • 1.Hardy GH. Note on a theorem of Hilbert. Mathematische Zeitschrift. 1920;6(3-4):314–317. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hardy GH, Littlewood JE, Polya G. Inequalities. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1934. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hardy GH. Notes on some points in the integral calculus. Messenger of Mathematics. 1928;57:12–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pachpatte BG. On some generalizations of Hardy’s integral inequality. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. 1999;234(1):15–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pachpatte BG. On Hardy type integral inequalities for functions of two variables. Demonstratio Mathematica. 1995;28(2):239–244. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pecaric JE, Love ER. Still more generalizations of Hardy’s inequality. Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society. 1995;58:1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Love ER. Generalizations of Hardys inequality. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. 1985;100:237–262. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yang BC, Brnetić I, Krnić M, Peĉarić J. Generalization of Hilbert and Hardy-Hilbert integral inequalities. Mathematical Inequalities & Applications. 2005;8:259–272. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yang B, Debnath L. On the extended Hardy-Hilbert’s inequality. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. 2002;272(1):187–199. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jichang K, Debnath L. On new generalizations of Hilbert’s inequality and their applications. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. 2000;245(1):248–265. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sarikaya MZ, Yildirim H. Some Hardy type integral inequalities. Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics. 2006;7(5, article 178) [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhao CJ, Debnath L. Some new inverse type Hilbert integral inequalities. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. 2001;262:411–418. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Miklyukov VM, Vuorinen MK. Hardy’s inequality for w1,p0-functions on riemannian manifolds. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. 1999;127(9):2745–2754. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Opic B, Kufner A. Hardy-Type Inequalities. Essex, UK: Longman; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kufner A, Persson LE. Weighted Inequalities of Hardy Type. World Scientific; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Leng T, Feng Y. On Hardy-type integral inequalities. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics. 2013;34(10):1297–1304. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Copson ET. Some integral inequalities. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. 1976;75:157–164. [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Scientific World Journal are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES