Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Comparative Cytogenetics logoLink to Comparative Cytogenetics
. 2014 Mar 11;8(1):71–80. doi: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v8i1.6444

Karyomorphometry on three polyploid species of Arum L. (Araceae, Aroideae)

Alessio Turco 1, Pietro Medagli 1, Antonella Albano 1, Saverio D’Emerico 2
PMCID: PMC3978243  PMID: 24744834

Abstract Abstract

In this study three polyploid Arum Linnaeus, 1753 species from Southern Italy were chromosomally investigated. Arum italicum Miller, 1768 was found to have 2n = 84 chromosomes and a karyotype composed of numerous asymmetric chromosomes. Arum maculatum Linnaeus, 1753 and Arum apulum (Carano) P. C. Boyce, 1993 were found to have 2n = 56 chromosomes. In the examined taxa some chromosome pairs were characterized by the presence of weakly coloured Feulgen-stained segments. The karyotype morphology of Arum italicum was found to be similar to that of Arum maculatum, but the more asymmetrical karyotype and numerous weakly coloured Feulgen-stained segments observed in the former suggest the existence of more extensive rearrangements. In contrast, Arum apulum was observed to have a symmetrical karyotype. The A1, A2 and SYi karyotype asymmetry indices are presented. The relationships between these taxa in terms of karyotype morphology and evolution are discussed.

Keywords: Allocyclic segments, karyotype asymmetry, karyotype evolution, Arum apulum, Arum italicum, Arum maculatum

Introduction

The high biodiversity of Araceae Jussieu, 1789, with ca. 109 genera and over 3700 species (Mayo et al. 1997), reflects their ability to occupy a wide range of environments. This family also displays a large variety of life forms, from epiphytic to aquatic, attesting to extensive adaptive radiation during the Cretaceous period (Chase et al. 2006, Anderson and Janssen 2009). Some Araceae genera exhibit heat production (Minorsky 2003). Indeed, Lamark first noticed that the inflorescences of Arum italicum Miller, 1768, produced heat in 1778 (Meeuse 1973). It was subsequently shown that several Araceae taxa can produce heating up to 22°C above the environmental temperature (Meeuse 1959). This is related to the group’s biology, as heat increases the volatilization rate of its odour, facilitating pollination (Dafni 1984). Chromosome counts have been conducted for 862 Araceae taxa, with the number varying from 2n = 10 for Typhonium jinpingense Z. L. Wang, H. Li & F. H. Bian, 2002 to 2n = 168 for Arisaema heterophyllum Blume, 1835 and Typhonium eliosurum (Bentham) O. D. Evans, 1961 (Cusimano et al. 2012 and references therein).

In this study we conducted a karyomorphometric survey of Arum Linnaeus, 1753, a small herbaceous genus containing about 28 species (Lobin et al. 2007), five of which are found among Italian vascular flora (Abbate et al. 2005, Conti et al. 2007). Arum maculatum Linnaeus, 1753 and Arum italicum have rhizomatous tubers while Arum apulum (Carano) P. C. Boyce, 1993 has a discoid tuber (Bedalov and Küpfer 2005). Bedalov and Küpfer (2005) suggested that the discoid tuber shape may represent the ancestral state of Arum with respect to the rhizomatous form, and this was confirmed by molecular studies conducted by Espìndola et al. (2010).

From a karyological point of view, the basic number for the Arum genus is x = 14 (Petersen 1993) with most of the species diploid rather than polyploid (Prime 1980). Arum maculatum and Arum apulum are tetraploid (2n = 56), while Arum italicum is hexaploid (2n = 84) (Marchi 1971, Beuret 1971, Bedalov et al. 2002, Lendel et al. 2006, Bedini et al. 2012). Most of the polyploid Arum taxa have been reported to occupy broader geographic ranges than their diploid counterparts (Bedalov 1981). The distribution of Arum italicum extends from the Caucasus through the Mediterranean region to the Atlantic coast (Bonnier 1931, Meusel et al. 1965, Dihoru 1970, Bedalov 1975). According to Meusel et al. (1965), Terpò (1973) and Bedalov (1981), Arum maculatum is distributed across Central and Western Europe. The broader geographical range of Arum italicum and Arum maculatum with respect to diploids such as Arum pictum Linnaeus filius, 1782 or Arum orientale M. Bieberstein, 1808 (Prime 1980) may be therefore explained by their capacity to colonize new areas. However, the diploid Arum alpinum Schott & Kotschy, 1851 has a very wide distribution (Bedalov and Fischer 1995) and the tetraploid Arum apulum has a very limited distribution, restricted to Southern Italy (Puglia) (Carano 1934, Gori 1958, Bianco et al. 1994).

Cytological investigations of Arum chromosome numbers have sought to clarify its taxonomy (Gori 1958, Marchi et al. 1964, Beuret 1971, 1972, Marchi 1971, Bedalov 1975, 1981). D’Emerico et al. (1993) and Bianco et al. (1994) also described the karyotypes of six species for the genus, and found that the studied taxa all had a “basic karyotype” characterized by the presence of marker-chromosome pairs. Specifically, they noticed that the diploids’ 14th pair is characterized by chromosomes with one satellite on the short arm and another on the long arm; this feature was also shown in pair 27 for Arum maculatum and Arum apulum (Bedalov et al. 1992, D’Emerico et al. 1993).

The purpose of this study is to acquire detailed new information on the karyomorphometry and chromosome structure of Arum italicum, Arum maculatum, and Arum apulum from Southern Italy.

Materials and methods

Samples of Arum italicum were collected from various sites in Puglia and Lucania, while samples of Arum maculatum were collected near Muro Lucano - Potenza (Lucania) and Arum apulum near Quasano, Sammichele, Turi - Bari (Puglia) (Table 1). Only Arum apulum and Arum italicum are cultured in the Museo Orto Botanico di Bari (Bari). The nomenclature used for classification follows Boyce (1989).

Table 1.

Arum taxa investigated and origin of samples.

Taxon Locality Collector
Arum apulum Apulia: Quasano (Bari) Medagli and D’Emerico 13.IV.2010
Apulia: Sammichele (Bari) Medagli and D’Emerico 15.IV.2010
Apulia: Turi (Bari) Medagli and D’Emerico 15.IV.2010
Arum italicum Apulia: Quasano (Bari) Medagli and D’Emerico 13.IV.2010
Apulia: Sammichele (Bari) Medagli and D’Emerico 15.IV.2010
Apulia: Turi (Bari) Medagli and D’Emerico 15.IV.2010
Lucania: Matera Medagli and D’Emerico 22.IV.2010
Lucania: Grottole (Matera) Medagli and D’Emerico 23.IV.2010
Lucania: Pomarico (Matera) Medagli and D’Emerico 23.IV.2010
Arum maculatum Lucania: Muro Lucano (Potenza) Medagli and D’Emerico 27.V.2010
Open in a new tab

Root-tips were pretreated in 0.3% aqueous colchicine at 20°C for two hours, and subsequently fixed for five min in a 5:1:1:1 (volume ratio) mixture of absolute ethanol, chloroform, glacial acetic acid and formalin. Hydrolysis was carried out at 20°C in 5.5 N HCl for 20 min (Battaglia 1957 a, b), then stained with Schiff’s reagent. Root tips were squashed in a drop of 45% acetic acid.

The nomenclature used for describing karyotype composition followed Levan et al. (1964). The karyotype parameters were composed following D’Emerico et al. (1996) and evaluated by calculating haploid complement lengths, the SYi index introduced by Greilhuber and Speta (1976) and the A1 and A2 indices proposed by Romero Zarco (1986). The SYi index describes the average symmetry of the karyotype, A1 is the intrachromosomal asymmetry index (i.e. the average position of the centromere in a karyotype) and A2, is the interchromosomal asymmetry index (i.e. variation in chromosome length). As a standard procedure, chromosome metaphase plates from at least five cells were measured.

For Giemsa C-banding, a modification of Schwarzacher et al. (1980) was used, but unfortunately in these taxa C-Banding staining was unable to differentiate chromosomal or nuclear structures.

Results and discussion

This study provides new cytological information on three polyploid Arum taxa. The present analysis is in agreement with the sectional segregation based on tuber structure in the classification of the Arum genus suggested by Boyce (1989).

In Arum italicum the chromosome number 2n = 84 (Fig. 2a) was observed in all the investigated populations, which is consistent with previous reports (Marchi 1971, Bedalov 1981). However, one individual from the Gargano Peninsula was found to have the chromosome number 2n = 85, as previously reported by Marchi (1971). The detailed karyotype morphology of this species consists of 38m+30sm+14st+2t chromosomes. Pairs 5, 7, 28, 33, 35 and 42 show weakly coloured segments with Feulgen-staining on the long arm, while pairs 9, 11 and 21 show these on the short arm, and pair 15 has a slightly Feulgen-stained segment on both arms. Pair 39 has a microsatellite on the short arm, while pairs 37 and 41 have a microsatellite on the short arm and a secondary constriction on the long arm (Figs 3, 4a).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

Somatic chromosomes of Arum species: a Arum italicum (2n = 84) b Arum maculatum (2n = 56) c Arum apulum (2n = 56). (Arrows show chromosomes with weakly coloured Feulgen-stained segments) Bar = 5µm.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

Karyotype of Arum italicum. Bar = 5µm.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

Haploid idiograms of Arum species: a Arum italicum b Arum maculatum c Arum apulum. (Telomeres shaded in gray show chromosomes with allocyclic segments).

Arum maculatum was found to have 2n = 56 somatic chromosomes (Fig. 2b), confirming earlier counts for this species on samples from the Balkan Peninsula (Bedalov 1981, D’Emerico et al. 1993). Our analyses show that the karyotype is similar to the previous reports and that it is characterized by the presence of 26m+24sm+6st chromosomes. However, individuals from central Puglia showed some differences in terms of the number and position of secondary constrictions. Pairs 1, 6, 19 and 28 have weakly coloured segments with Feulgen-staining on the long arm, while pairs 5, 18, 20 and 24 have these on the short arm and pair 27 has a microsatellite on the short arm and a secondary constriction on the long arm (Fig. 4b).

The samples of Arum apulum from Quasano, Sammichele and Turi (Bari) showed 2n = 56 chromosomes (Fig. 2c), in agreement with previous reports (Bianco et al. 1994). This species is characterized by a rather symmetrical karyotype, comprising mainly metacentric chromosomes. The karyotype morphology consists of 40m+16sm chromosomes. Pairs 1, 6 and 18 have weakly coloured segments with Feulgen-staining on the long arm; pair 16 has these on the short arm and pair 27 has a secondary constriction on the short arm and a microsatellite on the long arm (Fig. 4c).

The karyotype morphology of Arum italicum is similar to that of Arum maculatum. Arum italicum shows a more asymmetrical karyotype, with a higher intrachromosomal asymmetry index (A1 = 0.43) than Arum maculatum (A1 = 0.39). By contrast, Arum apulum possesses the most symmetrical karyotype of the three (A1 = 0.32) (Fig. 1, Table 2), being composed of mainly metacentric chromosomes and having few allocyclic segments. According to Stebbins (1971) the presence of metacentric chromosomes in the karyotype could be considered indicative of early divergence by a species. On the other hand, geographical isolation accompanied by ecological variation seems to support the current karyotype structure of Arum apulum.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Scatter diagram of A1, A2 and SYi values of Arum taxa examined.

Table 2.

Morphometric parameters (mean ± S. E.) of the karyotypes of three Arum taxa studied. Haploid complement length; Chromosome number; A1, A2 (Romero Zarco 1986) and Syi (Greilhuber and Speta 1976).

Taxa Haploid complement (µm) Chromosome number 2n A1 A2 SYi
Arum apulum 90.58 (± 3.12) 56 0.32 (± 0.01) 0.22 (± 0.01) 66.92 (± 1.61)
Arum maculatum 96.63 (± 2.46) 56 0.39 (± 0.01) 0.17 (± 0.01) 59.20 (± 0.27)
Arum italicum 169.22 (± 16.36) 84 0.43 (± 0.02) 0.21 (± 0.02) 55.61 (± 1.90)
Open in a new tab

In all the examined taxa some chromosome pairs are characterized by the presence of weakly stained segments, formerly described as secondary constrictions (D’Emerico et al. 1993). Dyer (1963) and Vosa and Colasante (1995) reported that similar segments have been found in several groups of plants (e.g. Gasteria Duval, 1809, Iris Linnaeus, 1753, Aloe Linnaeus, 1753). Moreover, they suggest that in somatic metaphase some chromosomes can exhibit non-contracted telomeric segments called “allocyclic segments”. Vosa and Bennett (1990) and Bennett and Grimshaw (1991) suggested that the presence of this type of segment could be used to distinguish species with similar karyotypes. In our study, Arum italicum showed numerous chromosomes with these segments, in contrast to Arum maculatum and Arum apulum. Polyploidy associated with structural changes in chromosomes is involved in bringing about further diversifications of karyotype morphology (Stebbins 1971). Therefore, on this basis we suggest Arum italicum is characterised by more rearrangement in its chromosome complement than the other two species.

Citation

Turco A, Medagli P, Albano A, D’Emerico S (2014) Karyomorphometry on three polyploid species of Arum L. (Araceae, Aroideae). Comparative Cytogenetics 8(1): 71–80. doi: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v8i1.6444

References

  1. Abbate G, Alessandrini A, Anzalone B, Bacchetta G, Ballelli S, Banfi E, Barberis C, Bernardo L, Blasi C, Bocchieri E, Bonacquisti S, Bouvet D, Bovio M, Brullo S, Conti F, Foggi B, Galasso G, Gallo L, Garbari F, Giusso del Galdo G, Gottschlich G, Gubellini L, Iberite M, Iiriti G, Lattanzi E, Lucchese F, Marchiori S, Medagli P, Montacchini F, Orsino F, Poldini L, Prosser F, Raffaelli M, Santangelo A, Scassellati E, Scoppola A, Siniscalco C, Soldano A, Spampinato G, Tornadore N, Viciani D. (2005) An annotated checklist of the Italian vascular flora. Palombi Editori, Roma, 420 pp. [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson C, Janssen T. (2009) Monocots. In: Hedges SB, Kumar S. (Eds). The timetree of life.Oxford, Oxford University Press: 203-212
  3. Battaglia E. (1957a) A new “5 minutes-fixation” in chromosome analysis. Caryologia 9: 368-370 doi: 10.1080/00087114.1957.10797602 [Google Scholar]
  4. Battaglia E. (1957b) A simplified Feulgen method using cold hydrolysis. Caryologia 9: 372-373 doi: 10.1080/00087114.1957.10797604 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bedalov M. (1975) Cytotaxonomical and phytogeographical investigation of the species Arum italicum Mill. in Yugoslavia. Acta Botanica Croatica 34: 143-150 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bedalov M. (1981) Cytotaxonomy of the genus Arum (Araceae) in the Balkans and the Aegean area. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 102: 183-200 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bedalov M, D’Emerico S, Bianco P, Medagli P. (1992) Karyological considerations of some diploid species of the genus Arum L. (Araceae). Proceeding of the IV International Aroid Conference. Moscow, August 24–30, 1992. Moscow, 14–15.
  8. Bedalov M, Fischer MA. (1995) Arum alpinum (Araceae) and its distribution in the Eastern Mediterranean. Phyton (Austria) 35 (1): 103-113 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bedalov M, Küpfer P. (2005) Studies on the genus Arum (Araceae). Bulletin de la Société Neuchâteloise des Sciences Naturelles 128: 43-70 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bedalov M, Matter B, Küpfer P. (2002) IOPB chromosome data 18. In: Stace AC (Ed) International Organization of Plant Biosystematists newsletter. Utrecht, Reading, Copenhagen, 20.
  11. Bedini G, Garbari F, Peruzzi L. (2012) Karyological knowledge of the Italian vascular flora as inferred by the analysis of “Chrobase.it”. Plant Biosystems 146 (4): 889-899 doi: 10.1080/11263504.2011.611182 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bennett ST, Grimshaw JM. (1991) Cytological studies in Cyclamen subg. Cyclamen (Primulaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 176: 135-143 doi: 10.1007/BF00937904 [Google Scholar]
  13. Beuret E. (1971) Répartition géographique de quelques Arum des groupes maculatum L. et italicum Mill. Bullettin de la Société Neuchâteloise des Sciences Naturelles 94: 29-36 [Google Scholar]
  14. Beuret E. (1972) Présence d’un Arum diploide en Italie. Bullettin de la Société Neuchâteloise des Sciences Naturelles 95: 35-41 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bianco P, D’Emerico S, Medagli P, Bedalov M. (1994) Indagini sistematiche su Arum apulum (Carano) Bedalov (Araceae), entità endemica delle Murge Pugliesi. Webbia 49 (1): 43-49 doi: 10.1080/00837792.1994.10670569 [Google Scholar]
  16. Bonnier G. (1931) Flore complète illustrée en couleurs de France Suisse et Belgique, 11. Librairie générale de l’enseignement, Paris, 23 pp. [Google Scholar]
  17. Boyce PC. (1989) A new classification of Arum with keys to the infrageneric taxa. Kew Bullettin 44(3): 383–395. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4110359
  18. Carano E. (1934) Un nuovo elemento della Flora meridionale d’Italia. Annali di Botanica 20: 579-585 [Google Scholar]
  19. Chase MW, Fay MF, Devey DS, Maurin O, Rønsted N, Davies TJ, Pillon Y, Petersen G, Seberg O, Tamura MN, Asmussen CB, Hilu K, Borsch T, Davis JI, Stevenson DW, Pires JC, Givnish TJ, Sytsma KJ, Mc Pherson MA, Graham SW, Rai HS. (2006) Multigene analyses of monocot relationships: a summary. Aliso 22: 63-75 [Google Scholar]
  20. Conti F, Alessandrini A, Bacchetta G, Banfi E, Barberis G, Bartolucci F, Bernardo L, Bonacquisti S, Bouvet D, Bovio M, Brusa G, Del Guacchio E, Foggi B, Frattini S, Galasso G, Gallo L, Gangale C, Gottschlich G, Grünanger P, Gubellini L, Iriti G, Lucarini D, Marchetti D, Moraldo B, Peruzzi L, Poldini L, Prosser F, Raffaelli M, Santangelo A, Scassellati E, Scortegagna S, Selvi F, Soldano A, Tinti D, Ubaldi D, Uzunof D, Vidali M. (2007) Integrazioni alla checklist della flora vascolare italiana. Natura Vicentina 10: 5-74 [Google Scholar]
  21. Cusimano N, Sousa A, Renner SS. (2012) Maximum likelihood inference implies a high, not a low, ancestral haploid chromosome number in Araceae, with a critique of the bias introduced by “x”. Annals of Botany 109: 681-692 doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. D’Emerico S, Bianco P, Medagli P. (1993) Chromosome numbers and karyotypes in Arum (Araceae). Caryologia 46: 161-170 doi: 10.1080/00087114.1993.10797257 [Google Scholar]
  23. D’Emerico S, Pignone D, Bianco P. (1996) Karyomorphological analyses and heterochromatin characteristics disclose phyletic relationships among 2n = 32 and 2n = 36 species of Orchis (Orchidaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 200: 111-124 doi: 10.1007/BF00984752 [Google Scholar]
  24. Dafni A. (1984) Mimicry and deception in pollination. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15: 259–278. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2096949 , doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.001355
  25. Dihoru G. (1970) Morpho-taxonomische aspekte einiger Arum-Arten. Revue Roumaine de Biologie, Série de Botanique 15: 71-85 [Google Scholar]
  26. Dyer AF. (1963) Allocyclic segments of chromosomes and structural heterozygosity that they reveal. Chromosoma 13: 545-576 doi: 10.1007/BF00321164 [Google Scholar]
  27. Espìndola A, Buerki S, Bedalov M, Kupfer P, Alvarez N. (2010) New insights into the phylogenetics and biogeography of Arum (Araceae): untravelling its evolutionary history. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 163: 14-32 doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2010.01049.x [Google Scholar]
  28. Gori C. (1958) Il numero dei cromosomi dell’Arum nigrum Schott. var. apulum Carano. Caryologia 10 (3): 454-456 doi: 10.1080/00087114.1958.10797637 [Google Scholar]
  29. Greilhuber J, Speta F. (1976) C-banded karyotypes in Scilla hohenackeri group, S. persica and Puschkinia (Liliaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 126: 149-188 doi: 10.1007/BF00981669 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lendel A, Bedalov M, Sabo M, Bačić T, Kristin L, Marček T. (2006) Comparative chromosome and molecular studies of some species of genus Arum from Eastern Slavonia and Baranya region in Croatia. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 75 (4): 285-292 doi: 10.5586/asbp.2006.034 [Google Scholar]
  31. Levan A, Fredga K, Sandberg AA. (1964) Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas 52: 201-220 doi: 10.1111/j.1601–5223.1964.tb01953.x [Google Scholar]
  32. Lobin W, Neuman M, Bogner J, Boyce PC. (2007) A new Arum species (Areae, Araceae) from NE Turkey and Georgia. Willdenowia 37: 445-449 doi: 10.3372/wi.37.37206 [Google Scholar]
  33. Marchi P. (1971) Numeri cromosomici per la flora italiana: 57–66. Informatore Botanico Italiano 3 (2): 124-138 [Google Scholar]
  34. Marchi P, Capineri R, D’amato G. (1964) Numeri cromosomici per la flora italiana: 182–189. Informatore Botanico Italiano 6 (3): 303-312 [Google Scholar]
  35. Mayo SJ, Bogner J, Boyce PC. (1997) The Genera of Araceae. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, London, 370 pp. [Google Scholar]
  36. Meeuse BJD. (1959) Beetles as pollinators. Biologists 42: 22-32 [Google Scholar]
  37. Meeuse BJD. (1973) Films of liquid cristals as an aid in pollination studies. In: Brantjes NBM, Linkens HF. (Eds). Pollination and dispersal.The Netherlands: Dep. Botany, Univ. Nijmegen: 19-20
  38. Meusel H, Jaeger E, Weinert E. (1965) Vergleichende Chorologie der zentra-europäischen. Flora 1.
  39. Minorsky PV. (2003) The hot and the classic. Plant Physiology 132: 1779-1780 doi: 10.1104/pp.900085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Petersen G. (1993) Chromosome numbers of the genera Araceae. Aroideana 16: 37-46 [Google Scholar]
  41. Prime CT. (1980) Arum L. In: Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA. (Eds). Flora Europaea 5.Cambridge: 269-271
  42. Romero Zarco C. (1986) A new method for estimating karyotype asymmetry. Taxon 35: 526–530. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1221906 , doi: 10.2307/1221906
  43. Schwarzacher T, Ambros P, Schweizer D. (1980) Application of Giemsa banding to orchid karyotype analysis. Plant Systematics and Evolution 134: 293-297 doi: 10.1007/BF00986805 [Google Scholar]
  44. Stebbins GL. (1971) Chromosomal Evolution in Higher Plants. Edward Arnold Ltd, London, 216 pp. [Google Scholar]
  45. Terpó A. (1973) Kritische Revision der Arum-Arten des Karpatenbeckens. Acta Botanica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 18: 216-255 [Google Scholar]
  46. Vosa CG, Bennett ST. (1990) Chromosome studies in the Southern African flora: 58–94. Chromosome evolution in the genus Gasteria Duval. Caryologia 43: 235-247 doi: 10.1080/00087114.1990.10797002 [Google Scholar]
  47. Vosa CG, Colasante M. (1995) I segmenti allociclici nelle Liliiflorae. Informatore Botanico Italiano 27: 307-308 [Google Scholar]

Articles from Comparative Cytogenetics are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES